, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access
US Congress’ Powers under Debate
Separation of Powers and Parliamentary Politics in Times of War and Crisis- Authors:
- Series:
- Politics-Debates-Concepts. Politik-Debatten-Begriffe, Volume 9
- Publisher:
- 2022
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2022
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-8859-0
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-3425-7
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Politics-Debates-Concepts. Politik-Debatten-Begriffe
- Volume
- 9
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 317
- Product type
- Book Titles
Table of contents
ChapterPages
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 18
- 1. EMERGENCY POWERS PROBLEMATIC AND PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT No access Pages 19 - 29
- 2. PARLIAMENTARY POLITICS IN THE SEPARATION OF POWERS SYSTEM No access Pages 30 - 43
- 3.1 The Political Context of Article 48 No access
- 3.2 Article 48 in the Weimar Republic’s 1919 Constitution No access
- 3.3 How to Differentiate the Norm From the Exception No access
- 4.1 War Powers Resolution as an Example of Right Timing in Politics No access
- 4.2 Presidentialists, Congressionalists, and the Constitutional Interpretation of War Powers No access
- The Historic Opportunity for the Congress to Restore Its Powers No access
- Constitutional Questions and the Separation of Powers in the Debates No access
- Statutory Law or Constitutional Amendment? No access
- The Constitutionality of Concurrent Resolutions to Avoid Presidential Veto No access
- Congressional Decision-Making Through Inaction No access
- Partisanship, President Nixon, and the Legitimacy of the War Powers Resolution No access
- 4.4 Settling the Differences Between the House and Senate No access
- 4.5 A Rare Opportunity for Congress to Override a President’s Veto No access
- 4.6 Separation of War Powers Following the War Powers Resolution No access
- 4.7 ‘There is Only Room for One Commander in Chief, Not 535’ No access
- 5.1 Forty-years of Emergency Government in the United States No access
- 5.2 The Legislative History of the National Emergencies Act of 1976 No access
- 5.3 The Experience of the Weimar Republic as a Historical Reference No access
- 5.4 Recognising the Need to Have an Emergency Power Legislation No access
- 5.5 Defining the Scope of National Emergencies Through the Statutory Framework No access
- 5.6 Emergency Powers Problematic: Authority vs. Accountability No access
- 5.7 ‘Absence From Dependence on Arbitrary Power’ No access
- 6.1 From United Government to Divided Government No access
- 6.2 War and Emergency Powers Legislation in the Post-9/11 Context No access
- 6.3 Terrorist Attacks as a Limit for the Rhetoric No access
- 6.4 Between Norm and Exception No access
- 7. PRESIDENT OBAMA’S CALL ON CONGRESS No access Pages 260 - 266
- 8. ‘CONSTITUTIONAL CANNIBALISM’, SEPARATION OF POWERS, AND THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION No access Pages 267 - 279
- 9. CONCLUSIONS No access Pages 280 - 290
- Representatives and Senators No access
- Weimar: No access
- Weimarer Nationalversammlung No access
- Congressional Record: No access
- Individual remarks: No access
- Committee reports and hearings: No access
- Online databases and resources: No access
- Literature No access
Bibliography (170 entries)
No match found. Try another term.
- Ackerman, Bruce. 2000. ‘The New Separation of Powers’. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 113, No. 3, 642–729. Open Google Scholar
- Ackerman, Bruce. 2009. ‘Why We Need a Commission on Presidential Power’. The American Prospect. 25 March 2009. https://prospect.org/article/need-commission-presidential-power/. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Translated Kevin Atte. Chicago: Chicago UP. Open Google Scholar
- Amar, Akhil R. 2005. America’s Constitution. A Biography. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar
- Anderson, Scott R. and Benjamin Wittes. 2020. ‘We Filed Suit Over Trump’s Missing War Powers Report’. Lawfare. 9 June 2020. https://www.lawfareblog.com/we-filed-suit-over-trumps-missing-war-powers-report. Accessed 3 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Anschütz, Gerhard, Karl Bilfinger, Carl Schmitt and Erwin Jacobi. 1924. Der Deutsche Föderalismus. Die Diktatur des Reichspräsidenten. Berlin & Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
- Atanassow, Ewa and Ira Katznelson. 2020. ‘Negotiating the Rule of Law: Dilemmas of Security and Liberty Revisited’. In Gary Gerstle and Joel Isaac (eds.), States of Exception in American History. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 39–67. Open Google Scholar
- Auerswald, David. P. and Peter F. Cowhey. 1997. ‘Ballotbox Diplomacy: The War Powers Resolution and the Use of Force’. International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 41, No. 3, 505–528. Open Google Scholar
- Auerswald, David P. 2017. ‘Legislatures and civil-military relations in the United States and the United Kingdom’. West European Politics. Vol. 40, Issue 1, 42–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1240404. Open Google Scholar
- Bagehot, Walter. 2000 (1872). The English Constitution. Second edition. Ontario: Batoche Books. Open Google Scholar
- Bagehot, Walter. 2001 (1867). The English Constitution. Edited by Miles Taylor. Oxford: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- Balakrishnan, Gopal. 2002. The enemy: an intellectual portrait of Carl Schmitt. New York: Verso. Open Google Scholar
- Balkin, Jack M. and Sanford Levinson. 2010. ‘Constitutional Dictatorship: Its Dangers and Its Design’. Minnesota Law Review. Vol. 94, No. 6, 1790–1865. Open Google Scholar
- Barret, John Q. 2007. ‘The Nuremberg roles of Justice Robert H. Jackson’. Washington University Global Studies Law Review. Vol. 6, Issue 3, 511–525. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol6/iss3/5/. Accessed 3 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Barron, David J. and Martin S. Lederman. 2008a. ‘The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb – Framing the Problem, Doctrine, and Original Understanding’. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 121, No. 3, 689–804. Open Google Scholar
- Barron, David J. and Martin S. Lederman. 2008b. ‘The Commander in Chief at the Lowest Ebb – A Constitutional History’. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 121, No. 4, 941–1112. Open Google Scholar
- Binder, Sarah A. 2010. ‘Testimony. The History of Filibuster’. Brookings. 22 April 2010. https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/the-history-of-the-filibuster/. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Björk, Anna. 2011. The politics of citizenship tests: time, integration and the contingent polity. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, 431. Open Google Scholar
- Blumenauer, Earl. 2019. ‘Press release: Blumenauer, Ocasio-Cortez, and Sanders Introduce Resolution to Declare the Climate Crisis as National Emergency’. 9 July 2019. https://blumenauer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/blumenauer-ocasio-cortez-and-sanders-introduce-resolution-declare. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Bolton, Alexander. 2020. ‘Democrats conflicted over how to limit Trump’s war powers’. The Hill. 11 January 2020. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/477763-democrats-conflicted-over-how-to-limit-trumps-war-powers. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Bradley, Curtis A. and Jack L. Goldsmith. 2005. ‘Congressional Authorization and the War on Terrorism’. Harvard Law Review. Vol. 118, No. 7, 2048–2133. Open Google Scholar
- Brandeis, Louis. 1926. ‘Dissenting opinion, Myers v. United States, 272 US 52 (1926)’. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0272_0052_ZD1.html. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Brecht, Arnold. 1944. Prelude to Silence. The end of the German Republic. New York: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- Brockmeier Sarah, Oliver Stuenkel, Marcos Tourinho. 2015. ‘The Impact of the Libya Intervention. Debates on Norms of Protection’. Global Society. Vol. 30, Issue 1, 113–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1094029. Open Google Scholar
- Brose, Ekkehard. 2013. ‘When Germany Sends Troop Abroad. The case for a limited reform of the Parliamentary Participation Act’. SWP Research Paper. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/research_papers/2013_RP09_bre.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Burns, Sarah. 2019. The Politics of War Powers. The Theory and History of Presidential Unilateralism. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. Open Google Scholar
- Burns, Sarah. 2021. ‘Legalizing a Political Fight: Congressional Abdication of War Powers in the Bush and Obama Administrations’. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 51, No. 3, 462–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12729. Open Google Scholar
- Böller, Florian. 2017. ‘Debating War and Peace: US Congress and the Domestic Legitimatization of Military Interventions’. Democracy and Security. Vol. 13, Issue 3, 196–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2017.1326309. Open Google Scholar
- Böller, Florian. 2021. ‘Vandenberg Vanished: US Congress and the Politicization of Military Interventions’. Parliamentary Affairs. Published 29 March 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsab023. Open Google Scholar
- Caldwell, Peter C. 1997. Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law. The theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism. Durham & London: Duke UP. Open Google Scholar
- Campion, Gilbert. 1958 (1929). An Introduction to the Procedure of the House of House of Commons. London: McMillan & CO Ltd. Open Google Scholar
- Carcia, Michael John. 2012. ‘War Powers Ligitation Initiated by Members of Congress Since the Enactment of the War Powers Resolution’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code RL30352, 17 February 17 2012. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/RL30352.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Carney, Jordain. 2016. ‘McConnell fast-tracks Graham’s ISIS war bill’. The Hill. 21 January 2016. https://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/266583-mcconnell-fast-tracks-isis-war-bill/. Accessed 12 August 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Carney, Jordain. 2019. ‘Paul blocks vote on House-passed Syria resolution for second time’. The Hill. 22 October 2019. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/467012-paul-blocks-vote-on-house-passed-syria-resolution-for-second-time. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Carter, Stephen L. 1984. ‘The Constitutionality of the War Powers Resolution’. Virginia Law Review. Vol. 70, No. 1, 101–134. Open Google Scholar
- Casey, Christopher A., Ian F. Ferguson, Dianne E. Rennack, Jennifer K. Elsea. 2020. ‘The International Economic Powers Act: Origins, Evolution, and Use’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code R45618, 14 July 2020. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R45618.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Chafetz, Josh. 2017. Congress’s Constitution. Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Collier, Ellen C. and Richard F. Grimmet. 2019. ‘The War Powers Resolution: Concepts and Practice’. CRS report for Congress. Order code R42699, updated 8 March 2019. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R42699.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Dean, John. 2002. ‘FindLaw Forum: President needs congressional approval to declare war on Iraq’. https://edition.cnn.com/2002/LAW/08/columns/fl.dean.warpowers/index.html. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Desiderio, Andrew. 2021a. ‘Unlikely Senate alliance aims to claw back Congress’ foreign policy powers “before it’s too late”’. Politico. 20 July 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/20/bipartisan-senators-congress-war-powers-500214. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Desiderio, Andrew. 2021b. ‘Iraq War authorization repeal clears key Senate hurdle’. Politico. 4 August 2021. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/04/iraq-war-authorization-repeal-502382. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Dyzenhaus, David. 1997a. Legality and Legitimacy. Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Herman Heller in Weimar. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
- Dyzenhaus, David. 1997b. ‘Legal Theory in the Collapse of Weimar’. The American Political Science Review. Vol. 91, No. 1, 121–134. Open Google Scholar
- Dyzenhaus, David. 2020. ‘Beyond the Exception’. In Gary Gerstle and Joel Isaac (eds.), States of Exception in American History. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 68–91. Open Google Scholar
- Ely, John H. 1988. ‘Suppose Congress Wanted a War Powers Act that Worked’. Columbia Law Review. Vol. 88, No. 7, 1379–1431. Open Google Scholar
- Emerson, Terry. 1971. ‘War Powers Legislation’. West Virginia Law Review. Vol. 74, Issue 1, 53–119. Open Google Scholar
- Farr, James. 1989. ‘Understanding conceptual change politically’. In Terrence Ball, James Farr, Russell L. Hanson (eds.), Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 24–49. Open Google Scholar
- Ferejohn, John and Pasquale Pasquino. 2004. ‘The law of the exception: A typology of emergency powers’. International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 2, No. 2, 210–239. Open Google Scholar
- Finlayson, Alan. 2017. ‘What is the Point of Parliamentary Debate? Deliberation, Oratory, Opposition and Spectacle in the British House of Commons’. Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. Vol. 20, No. 1, 11–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/R.20.1.2. Open Google Scholar
- Fisher, Louis. 1995. ‘The Korean War: On What Legal Basis Did Truman Act?’ The American Journal of International Law. Vol. 89, No. 1, 21–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2203888. Open Google Scholar
- Fisher, Louis. 1997. ‘Sidestepping Congress: Presidents Acting under the UN and NATO’. Case Western Law Review. Vol. 47, Issue 4, 1237–1279. Open Google Scholar
- Fisher, Louis and David Gray Adler. 1998. ‘The War Powers Resolution: Time to Say Goodbye’. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 113, No. 1, 1–20. Open Google Scholar
- Fisher, Louis. 2005. ‘Judicial Review of the War Power’. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35, Issue 3, 466–495. Open Google Scholar
- Fisher, Louis. 2007. Constitutional Conflicts between Congress and the President. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Open Google Scholar
- Fisher, Louis. 2011. Defending Congress and the Constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Open Google Scholar
- Fonck, Daan and Yf Reykers. 2018. ‘Parliamentarisation as a Two-Way Process: Explaining Prior Parliamentary Consultation for Military Interventions’. Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 71, Issue 3, 674–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx081. Open Google Scholar
- Ford, Gerald. 1976. ‘Statement on Signing the National Emergencies Act’. September 14, 1976. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=6334#axzz1tWR223gE. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Fraenkel, Ernst. 1960. Das amerikanische Regierungssystem. Eine politische Analyse. Köln und Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Friedrich, Carl J. 1928. ‘The Issue of Judicial Review in Germany’. Political Science Quarterly. Vol. 43, No. 2, 188–200. Open Google Scholar
- Frykholm, Lars. 1942. Studier över artikel 48 i Weimar-författningen. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells Boktryckeri A.B. Open Google Scholar
- Fuller, Glenn E. 1979. ‘The National Emergency Dilemma: Balancing the Executive’s Crisis Powers with the Need for Accountability’. Southern California Law Review. Vol. 52, 1453–1511. Open Google Scholar
- Garvey, Todd. 2012. ‘Presidential Signing Statements: Constitutional and Institutional Implications’. CRS Report for Congress. Order Code RL33667, 4 January 2012. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33667.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Genovese, Michael A. and David Gray Adler. 2017. The War Powers in the Age of Terrorism. Debating Presidential Powers. New York: Palgrave and Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
- Gerstle, Gary and Joel Isaac. 2020. ‘Introduction’. In Gary Gerstle and Joel Isaac (eds.), States of Exception in American History. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 1–13. Open Google Scholar
- Glennon, Michael J. 1984a. ‘The War Powers Resolution Ten Years Later: More Politics than Law’. The American Journal of International Law. Vol. 78, No. 3, 571–581. Open Google Scholar
- Glennon, Michael J. 1984b. ‘The War Powers Resolution: Sad Record, Dismal Promise’. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. Vol. 17, No. 3, 657–670. Open Google Scholar
- Goitein, Elizabeth. 2019. ‘The Alarming Scope of the President’s Emergency Powers’. Atlantic, January/February 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/01/presidential-emergency-powers/576418/. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Goldberg, Jeffrey. 2016. ‘The Obama Doctrine’. The Atlantic. April 2016 issue. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, Jack and Samuel Moyn. 2021. ‘Does Biden Really Want to End the Forever Wars?’ The New York Times. Opinion. 22 March 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/22/opinion/biden-forever-wars.html. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Grimmet, Richard F. 2010. ‘The War Powers Resolution: After Thirty-Six Years’. CRS Report for Congress. Order Code R41199, 22 April 2010. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41199.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Gross, Oren and Fionnuala Ní Aoláin. 2006. Law in Times of Crisis. Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge UP. Open Google Scholar
- Haapala, Taru. 2016. Political Rhetoric in the Oxford and Cambridge Unions, 1830–1870. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
- Hamilton, Alexander. 1788. ‘The Real Character of the Executive’. The Federalist Papers. No. 69. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Hamilton, Alexander. 1788. ‘New York Ratifying Convention. First Speech of June 25 (Francis Childs’s Version), [25 June 1788]’. Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-05v02-0012-0027. [Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol. 5, June 1788 – November 1789, ed. Harold C. Syrett. New York: Columbia University Press, 1962, 80–86.] Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Holborn, Hajo. 1975. A History of Modern Germany 1840–1945. New York: Alfred A Knopf. Open Google Scholar
- Honig, Bonnie. 2011. Paradox, Law, Democracy. Emergency Politics. New Jersey: Princeton UP. Open Google Scholar
- Howell, Beryl A. 2004. ‘Seven Weeks: The Making of the USA PATRIOT Act’. George Washington Law Review. Vol. 72, Issue 6, 1145–1207. Open Google Scholar
- Howell, William G. and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2005. ‘Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force’. International Organization. Vol. 59, Issue 1, 209–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050034. Open Google Scholar
- Häkkinen, Teemu. 2014. ‘The concept of the Royal Prerogative in parliamentary debates on the deployment of military in the British House of Commons, 1982–2003’. Redescriptions. Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. Vol. 17, No. 2, 160–179. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.17.2.4. Open Google Scholar
- Ihalainen, Pasi and Kari Palonen. 2009. ‘Parliamentary sources in the comparative study of conceptual history: methodological aspects and illustrations of a research proposal’. Parliaments, Estates & Representation. Vol. 29, Issue 1, 17–34. Open Google Scholar
- Ihalainen, Pasi and Satu Matikainen. 2016. ‘The British Parliament and Foreign Policy in the 20th Century: Towards Increasing Parliamentarisation?’ Parliamentary History. Vol. 35 No. 1, 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1750–0206.12180. Open Google Scholar
- Ihalainen, Pasi and Aleksi Sahala. 2020. ‘Evolving Conceptualisations of Internationalism in the UK Parliament. Collocation Analyses from the League to Brexit’. In Mats Fridlund, Mila Oiva, and Petri Paju (eds.), Digital Histories: Emergent Approaches within the New Digital History. Helsinki University Press, 199–219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-5-12. Open Google Scholar
- Jackson, Robert H. 1952. ‘Concurring opinion, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952)’. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0343_0579_ZC2.html. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Javits, Jacob K. 1985. ‘War Powers Reconsidered’. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 64, No.1, 130–140. Open Google Scholar
- Jefferson, Thomas. 1801. ‘Jefferson’s Manual of parliamentary practice’. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/content-detail.html. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Johnson, Richard. 2021. ‘The 1982 Voting Rights Act Extension as a “Critical Juncture:” Ronald Reagan, Bob Dole, and Republican Party-Building’. Studies in American Political Development. Vol. 35, Issue 2, 223–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X21000079. Open Google Scholar
- Kelsen, Hans. 1930–1931. ‘Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein?’ Die Justiz. Vol. 6, 576–628. Open Google Scholar
- Kelsen, Hans. 1942. ‘Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution’. The Journal of Politics. Vol. 4, No. 2, 183–200. Open Google Scholar
- Klieman, Aaron S. 1979a. ‘Preparing for the Hour of Need: The National Emergencies Act’. Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 9, No. 1, 47–65. Open Google Scholar
- Klieman, Aaron S. 1979b. ‘Preparing for the Hour of Need: Emergency Powers in the United States’. The Review of Politics. Vol. 41, No. 2, 235–255. Open Google Scholar
- Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. Chicago: Chicago UP. Open Google Scholar
- Koh, Harold H. 1988. ‘Why the President (Almost) Always Wins in Foreign Affairs: Lessons of the Iran-Contra Affairs’. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 97, No. 7, 1255–1342. Open Google Scholar
- Kolb, Eberhard. 1984. Die Weimarer Republik. München: Oldenbourg Verlagen. Open Google Scholar
- Kriner, Douglas L. 2018. ‘Congress, public opinion, and an informal constraint on the commander-in-chief’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 20, No. 1, 52–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117745860. Open Google Scholar
- Kronlund, Anna. 2013. Parliamentary Oversight of the Exceptional Situations in a Presidential System. Debating the Reassertion of the Constitutional Powers of the US Congress. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research, 468. Open Google Scholar
- Kronlund, Anna. 2015. ‘The US Congress and decision-making on war: Debates on war powers in the separation of powers system’. FIIA Working Paper no. 83. https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/the-us-congress-and-decision-making-on-war. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Kronlund, Anna. 2019. ‘”The Iraq War Momentum” in the Struggle on the Powers of the US Congress’. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory. Vol. 22, No. 1, 51–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33134/rds.311. Open Google Scholar
- Kurz, Achim. 1992. Demokratische Diktatur? Auslegung und Handhabung des Artikels 48 der Weimarer Verfassung 1919–1925. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
- Lasswell, Harold. 1958 (1936). Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Meridian Books Open Google Scholar
- Lazar, Nomi Claire. 2009. States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies. New York: Cambridge UP. Open Google Scholar
- Lazar, Nomi Claire. 2020. ‘What is the State of Exception?’ In Gary Gerstle and Joel Isaac (eds.), States of Exception in American History. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 17–38. Open Google Scholar
- Lehnert, Detlef. 1999. Die Weimarer Republik. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun. Open Google Scholar
- Lindseth, Peter L. 2004. ‘The Paradox of Parliamentary Supremacy: Delegation, Democracy, and Dictatorship in Germany and France, 1920s-1950s’. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 113, No. 7, 1341–1415. Open Google Scholar
- Lobel, Jules. 1989. ‘Emergency Power and the Decline of Liberalism’. The Yale Law Journal. Vol. 98, No. 7, 1385–1433. Open Google Scholar
- Madison, James. 1788. ‘The Particular Structure of the New Government and the Distribution of Power Among its Different Parts’. The Federalist Papers. No. 47. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Madison, James or Hamilton, Alexander. 1788. ‘The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments’. The Federalist Papers. No. 51. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Madison, James or Hamilton, Alexander. 1788. ‘The Total Number of the House of Representatives’. The Federalist Papers. No. 55. https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/full-text. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Mann, Thomas E. and Norman J. Ornstein. 2008. The Broken Branch. How Congress is Failing America and How to Get it Back on Track. New York: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- McKay, William and Charles W. Johnson. 2010. Parliament and Congress. Representation and Scrutiny in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- Mello, Patrick. A., Dirk Peters. 2018. ‘Parliaments in Security Policy: Involvement, Politicisation, and Influence’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 20, Issue 1, 3–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117745684. Open Google Scholar
- Mergel, Thomas. 2002. Parlamentarische Kultur in der Weimarer Republik. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Mommsen, Hans. 1996. The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy. Translated by Elborg Forster and Larry Eugene Jones. Chapel Hill & London: The University of North Carolina Press. Open Google Scholar
- Newton, Michael. A. 2012. ‘Inadvertent Implications of the War Powers Resolution’. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. Vol. 45, Issue 1/2, 173–195. Accessed via Proquest. Open Google Scholar
- Palonen, Kari. 2006. The Struggle With Time. A Conceptual History of ‘Politics’ as an Activity. Hamburg, London: LIT Verlag Münster. Open Google Scholar
- Palonen, Kari. 2007. Rethinking Politics. Essays from a quarter-century. Ed. by Kia Lindroos. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association. Open Google Scholar
- Palonen, Kari. 2008. The Politics of Limited Times. The Rhetoric of Temporal Judgment in Parliamentary Democracies. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Palonen, Kari. 2010. ‘Book Review, A Lost Momentum of Parliamentary Democracy?’ Redescriptions. Vol. 14, Issue 1, 203–208. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.14.1.13. Open Google Scholar
- Palonen, Kari. 2013. ‘Parliamentarism as a European type of polity – Constructing the presidentialism vs. parliamentarism divide in Walter Bagehot’s English Constitution’. In Meike Schmidt-Gleim and Claudia Wiesner (eds.), Meanings of Europe. London: Routledge, 74–87. Open Google Scholar
- Paris, Francesca. 2019. ‘16 States Sue Over Trump’s National Emergency Declaration’. NPR. 18 February 2019. https://www.npr.org/2019/02/18/695821740/16-states-sue-over-trumps-national-emergency-declaration. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Patch, William L. Jr. 1998. Heinrich Brüning and the Dissolution of the Weimar Republic. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge UP. Open Google Scholar
- Pettit, Philip. 2002. Republicanism. A Theory of Freedom and Government. New York: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- Phelps, Glenn A. and Timothy S. Boylan. 2002. ‘Discourses of War: The Landscape of Congressional Rhetoric’. Armed Forces & Society. Vol. 28, No. 4, 641–667. Open Google Scholar
- Pocock, J.G.A. 1981. ‘The Machiavellian Moment Revisited: A Study in History and Ideology’. The Journal of Modern History. Vol. 53, No. 1, 49–72. Open Google Scholar
- Pocock, J.G.A. 2003 (1975). The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. New Jersey: Princeton UP. Open Google Scholar
- Pradshaw, Kenneth and David Pring. 1972. Congress and the Parliament. London: Quartet Books. Open Google Scholar
- Preuss, Hugo. 1923. ‘Reichsverfassungsmässige Diktatur’. Zeitschrift für Politik. Dreizehnter Band 1923/1924, 97–113. Open Google Scholar
- Pyle, Christopher H. and Richard M. Pious. 1984. The President, Congress and the Constitution. Power and Legitimacy in American Politics. New York: The Free Press. Open Google Scholar
- Ramsey, Michael D. 2012. ‘Textualism and War Powers’. The University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 69, No. 4, 1543–1638. DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.jyu.fi/10.2307/1600614. Open Google Scholar
- Raunio, Tapani and Wolfgang Wagner. 2017. ‘Towards parliamentarisation of foreign and security politics?’ West European Politics. Vol. 40, Issue 1, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1240411. Open Google Scholar
- Relyea, Harold C. 2005. ‘Continuity of Government: Current Federal Arrangements and the Future’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code RS21089, 5 August 2005. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/RS21089.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Relyea, Harold C. 2007. ‘National Emergency Powers’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code 98–505 GOV, 30 August 2007. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/98-505.pdf (updated in 2021.) Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Remini, Robert. 2006. The History of the House of Representatives. New York: Smithsonian Books in association with HarperCollins Publishers. Open Google Scholar
- Rhodes, Ben. 2018. ‘Inside the White House During the Syrian ‘Red Line’ Crisis’. The Atlantic. 3 June 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/inside-the-white-house-during-the-syrian-red-line-crisis/561887/. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Richter, Melvin and Michaela W. Richter. 2006. ‘Introduction: Translation of Reinhart Koselleck’s “Krise” in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe’. Journal of the History of Ideas. Vol. 67, No. 2, 343–356. Open Google Scholar
- Rogers, William P. 1971. ‘Congress, the President, and the War Powers’. California Law Review. Vol. 59, No. 5, 1194–1214. Open Google Scholar
- Rostow, Eugene V. 1986. ‘”Once More Unto the Breach:” The War Powers Resolution Revisited’. Valparaiso University Law Review. Vol. 21, No. 1, 1–52. Open Google Scholar
- Saunders, Elizabeth. 2014. Leaders at War: How Presidents Shape Military Interventions. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Savage, Charlie and Mark Landler. 2011. ‘White House Defends Continuing US Role in Libya Operation’. The New York Times. 15 June 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/16/us/politics/16powers.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2004. ‘Law in a time of emergency: States of exception and the temptations of 9/11’. Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 6, No. 5, 1001–1083. Open Google Scholar
- Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2006. ‘Small emergencies’. Georgia Law Review. Vol. 40, Issue 3, 835–862. Open Google Scholar
- Schlesinger, Arthur Jr. 2004. The Imperial Presidency. Boston, New York: A Mariner Book Houghton Mifflin Company. Open Google Scholar
- Schmitt, Carl. 1985 (1922). Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
- Schmitt, Carl. 1994 (1921). Die Diktatur. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar
- Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Open Google Scholar
- Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Open Google Scholar
- Soininen, Suvi and Tapani Turkka. 2008. The Parliamentary Style of Politics. Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association. Open Google Scholar
- Spong, William B. Jr. 1971. ‘Can Balance Be Restored in the Constitutional War Powers of the President and Congress?’ University of Richmond Law Review. Vol. 6, No. 1, 1–47. Open Google Scholar
- Spong, William B. Jr. 1975. ‘The War Powers Resolution Revisited: Historic Accomplishment or Surrender?’ William and Mary Law Review. Vol. 16, Issue 4, 823–882. Open Google Scholar
- Steiner, Jürg, André Bächtiger, Markus Spörndli and Marco R. Steenbergen. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action. Analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Open Google Scholar
- Stirk, Peter. 2005. ‘Hugo Preuss, German Political Thought and the Weimar Constitution’. History of Political Thought. Vol. 23, No. 3, 497–516. Open Google Scholar
- Stolleis, Michael. 2003. ‘Judicial Review, Administrative Review, and Constitutional Review in the Weimar Republic’. Ratio Juris. Vol. 16, Issue 2, 266–280. Open Google Scholar
- Stolleis, Michael. 2004. A History of Public Law in Germany 1914–1945. Translated by Thomas Dunlap. New York: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- Stone, George R. 2005. Perilous Times. Free Speech in Wartime. From the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
- Stone, George R. 2007. War and Liberty. An American Dilemma: 1790 to Present. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
- Torreon Salazar, Barbara and Sofia Plagakis. 2020. ‘Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code R42739, Updated 20 July 2020. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R42738. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Truman, Harry S. 1950. ‘Proclamation 2914 – Proclaiming the Existence of a National Emergency’. The American Presidency Project. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-2914-proclaiming-the-existence-national-emergency. Accessed 8 August 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Wagner, Wolfgang. 2020. The Democratic Politics of Military Interventions. Political Parties, Contestation, and Decisions to use Force Abroad. Oxford: Oxford UP. Open Google Scholar
- Walt, Stephen M. 2019. ‘America’s Polarization is a Foreign Policy Problem, Too’. Foreign Policy. 11 March 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/03/11/americas-polarization-is-a-foreign-policy-problem-too/. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Ward, Alex. 2021. ‘White House signals support for replacing decades-long authorizations for military force’. Vox. 5 March 2021. https://www.vox.com/2021/3/5/22315258/white-house-biden-authorization-military-force-forever-wars. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Weed, Matthew C. 2017. ‘A New Authorization for Use of Military Force Against the Islamic State: Issues and Current Proposals’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code R43760, 21 February 2017. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R43760.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Wiesner, Claudia, Taru Haapala, Kari Palonen. 2017. Debates, rhetoric and political action: practices of textual interpretation and analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
- Wiley, James. 2016. Politics and the Concept of the Political. The Political Imagination. New York and London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Wilson, Graham K. 2009. ‘Congress in Comparative Perspective’. Boston Law Review. Vol. 89, No. 2, 827–845. Open Google Scholar
- Wilson, Woodrow. 1900 (1884). Congressional Government: A study in American Politics. Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. Open Google Scholar
- Wilson, Woodrow. 1961 (1908). Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia UP. Open Google Scholar
- Wolfe, Alan. 2009. The Future of Liberalism. New York: Vintage Book. Open Google Scholar
- Yeh, Brian T. and Charles Doyle. 2006. ‘USA Patriot Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005: A Legal Analysis’. CRS report for Congress. Order Code RL33332, 21 December 2006. http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/intel/RL33332.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2022. Open Google Scholar
- Zablocki, Clement J. 1984. ‘War Powers Resolution: Its Past Record and Future Promise’. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. Vol. 17, No. 3, 579–598. Open Google Scholar
- Zeisberg, Mariah. 2013. War Powers. The Politics of Constitutional Authority. Princeton: Princeton UP. Open Google Scholar
- Zurcher, Arnold J. 1950. ‘The Presidency, Congress and Separation of Powers: A Reappraisal’. The Western Political Quarterly. Vol. 3, No. 1, 75–97. Open Google Scholar





