The ‘freedom of art’ is frequently praised by German politicians and creative artists as a great good. The fact that the Grundgesetz of the Federal Republic of Germany grants art a higher degree of freedom than expressions of mere opinion is unique in the world: Everywhere else, art is subsumed under general freedom of expression and does not enjoy preferential treatment. This book begins at the starting point of Germany's special path in terms of artistic freedom in the 19th century, when art was declared ‘free’ but was in reality strictly limited: Due to the aesthetic idealism prevalent at the time, it had to be autonomous and ‘uninterested’, i.e. neither ‘lewd’ nor political. With the increasing politicisation and eroticisation of the arts in the 20th century, however, the original premises of ‘artistic freedom’ have eventually become outdated. In some respects, this is irrelevant: Freedom of expression has now been streched to such an extent that it is rarely necessary to invoke an additional measure of artistic freedom. However, state subsidisation of art can lead to the financing of works that convey messages that run counter to general social values. The resulting problem is explained in the last part of the volume in relation to anti-Semitism in the cultural sector.
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
Copyright year
2025
Publication date
22.05.2025
ISBN-Print
978-3-465-04673-8
ISBN-Online
978-3-465-14673-5
Publisher
Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main
Series
Klostermann / Nexus
Volume
111
Language
German
Pages
184
Product type
Book Titles
Table of contents
ChapterPages
Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 9
Einleitung: Kunstfreiheit als deutsche Ideologie No access Pages 10 - 17
Der Leipziger Realistenprozess: Naturalismus ist keine Kunst No access
Gerhart Hauptmanns Die Weber: Nur für brave Bürger No access
Die Lex Heinze: Sittlichkeit und Jugendschutz versus Kunstfreiheit No access
Das Lichtspielgesetz: Schwulen- und Judenfeindlichkeit als Beweggründe der Zensur No access
Der »Normalmensch« entscheidet, was unzüchtig ist: Godal, Kobbe und Dix vor Gericht No access
Der »einfache Mensch« entscheidet, was blasphemisch ist: Grosz vor Gericht No access
Kommunistische Tendenzkunst ist keine Kunst No access
Alfred Döblin: »Kunst ist nicht frei, sondern wirksam« No access
Das Schmutz- und Schundgesetz No access
»Kunstfreiheit« im »Dritten Reich« No access Pages 86 - 184
Similar publications
from the topics "Cultural History & Cultural Studies", "History General"
