Cover of book: Der Bürger*innenrat im System globaler Klimapolitik
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Der Bürger*innenrat im System globaler Klimapolitik

Eine Untersuchung des demokratisierenden Potenzials
Authors:
Series:
Politik begreifen, Volume 27
Publisher:
 04.05.2021

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2021
Publication date
04.05.2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4642-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7716-0
Publisher
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Series
Politik begreifen
Volume
27
Language
German
Pages
172
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access I - VIII
  2. 1 Einleitung No access 1 - 6
    1. 2.1 Von der Entdeckung des Problems zum Scheitern von Kopenhagen No access
    2. 2.2 Der Durchbruch von Paris: Hoffnung unter Vorbehalt No access
    3. 2.3 Problemdimensionen des Klimawandels No access
    4. 2.4 Die praktische Relevanz von Reformen der globalen Klimapolitik No access
    1. 3.1 Ein kritischer Ansatz deliberativer Demokratie No access
    2. 3.2 Deliberative Mini-Publics, der Bürger*innenrat und erste transnationale Projekte No access
      1. 4.1.1 Weshalb die Diagnose des Demokratieversagens verfehlt ist: die empirische Argumentation No access
      2. 4.1.2 Weshalb die Annahme der höheren Effektivität von Technokratie verfehlt ist: die theoretische Argumentation No access
      1. 4.2.1 Demokratie jenseits des Nationalstaats No access
      2. 4.2.2 Deliberative Demokratie und die Problemdimensionen des Klimawandels No access
    3. 4.3 Weshalb ein Bürger*innenrat? Moralische, epistemische und pragmatische Argumente No access
      1. 5.1.1 Umfassend-deskriptive Repräsentation: der demokratische Spiegel und sein Bruch No access
      2. 5.1.2 Unvollständig-deskriptive Repräsentation: der gekrümmte Spiegel No access
      3. 5.1.3 Unvollständig-deskriptive Repräsentation und externe Inklusion im Kontext eines globalen Bürger*innenrats No access
      4. 5.1.4 Praktische Implikationen und Herausforderungen externer Inklusion No access
      1. 5.2.1 Die isolierte Perspektive: Deliberation und interne Inklusion in einem globalen Bürger*innenrat No access
      2. 5.2.2 Die systemische Perspektive: ein globaler Bürger*innenrat als Ort der Reflexion No access
      1. 5.3.1 Ein globaler Bürger*innenrat als Adressat von Rechenschaftspflicht No access
      2. 5.3.2 Zur (Un-)Abhängigkeit eines globalen Bürger*innenrats No access
    4. 5.4 Drei Orte der Anbindung: administrative, hybride und öffentliche Sphäre No access
  7. 6 Fazit No access 145 - 150
  8. Literaturverzeichnis No access 151 - 172

Bibliography (233)

  1. Literaturverzeichnis Open Google Scholar
  2. Ambrose, Jillian (2020): Coronavirus poses threat to climate action, says watchdog, in: The Guardian Online, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/mar/12/coronovirus-poses-threat-to-climate-action-says-watchdog (15.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  3. Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija/Grönlund, Kimmo (2014): Towards a New Era of Deliberative Mini-Publics, in: Grönlund, Kimmo/Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija (Hrsg.): Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press, 225–246. Open Google Scholar
  4. Bächtiger, André/Niemeyer, Simon/Neblo, Michael/Steenbergen, Marco R.//Steiner, Jürg (2010): Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities, Symposium: Toward More Realistic Models of Deliberative Democracy, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), 32–63. Open Google Scholar
  5. Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (2018): Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31. Open Google Scholar
  6. Bäckstrand, Karin/Kuyper, Jonathan W./Linnér, Björn-Ola/Lävbrand, Eva (2017): Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond, in: Environmental Politics, 26 (4), 561–579. Open Google Scholar
  7. Bättig, Michèle B./Bernauer, Thomas (2009): National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy?, in: International Organization, 63, 281–308. Open Google Scholar
  8. Barber, Walter F./Bartlett, Robert V. (2018): Deliberative Democracy and the Environment, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 755–767. Open Google Scholar
  9. Beck, Silke (2011): Zwischen Entpolitisierung von Politik und Politisierung von Wissenschaft: Die wissenschaftliche Stellvertreterdebatte um Klimapolitik, in: Schüttemeyer, Suzanne S. (Hrsg.): Politik im Klimawandel. Keine Macht für gerechte Lösungen?, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 239–257. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bedall, Philip (2011): NGOs, soziale Bewegungen und Auseinandersetzungen um Hegemonie: Eine gesellschaftstheoretische Verortung in der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie, in: Brunnengräber, Achim (Hrsg.): Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes: NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 59–84. Open Google Scholar
  11. Beisheim, Marianne (2001): Demokratisierung einer klimapolitischen Global Governance durch NGOs? Chancen und Probleme des Legitimationspotentials von NGOs, in: Brunnengräber, Achim/Klein, Ansgar/Walk, Heike (Hrsg.): NGOs als Legitimationsressource: Zivilgesellschaftliche Partizipationsformen im Globalisierungsprozess, Opladen: Leske und Budrich, 115–136. Open Google Scholar
  12. Beisheim, Marianne (2004): Fit für Global Governance? Transnationale Interessengruppenaktivitäten als Demokratisierungspotential – am Beispiel Klimapolitik, Opladen: Leske und Budrich. Open Google Scholar
  13. Benz, Arthur (2004): Governance – Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept?, in: Benz, Arthur (Hrsg.): Governance – Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 11–28. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bernauer, Thomas/Gampfer, Robert (2015): How robust is public support for unilateral climate policy?, in: Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 316–330. Open Google Scholar
  15. Betsill, Michele M. (2011): International Climate Change Policy: Towards the Multilevel Governance of Global Warming, in: Axelrod, Regina S./Downie, David Leonard/VanDeveer, Stacy D. (Hrsg.): The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy, 3. Aufl., Washington DC: CQ Press, 111–131. Open Google Scholar
  16. Blais, André/Carty, R. Kenneth/Fournier, Patrick (2008): Do citizens’ assemblies make reasoned choices?, in: Warren, Mark E./Pearse, Hilary (Hrsg.): Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–144. Open Google Scholar
  17. Blue, Gwendolyn (2015): Public Deliberation with Climate Change: Opening Up or Closing down Policy Options?, in: RECIEL: Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 24 (2), 152–159. Open Google Scholar
  18. BMU (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit) (2017): Kyoto Mechanismen, https://www.bmu.de/themen/klima-energie/klimaschutz/internationale-klimapolitik/kyoto-protokoll/kyoto-mechanismen/ (28.01.2020). Open Google Scholar
  19. Böker, Marit (2017): Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics, in: Contemporary Political Theory, 16, 19–40. Open Google Scholar
  20. Bohman, James (2010): Democratising the global order: from communicative freedom to communicative power, in: Review of International Studies, 36, 431–447. Open Google Scholar
  21. Bohman, James (2012): Representation in the deliberative system, in: Parkinson, John/Mansbridge, Jane (Hrsg.): Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–94. Open Google Scholar
  22. Bray, Daniel/Slaughter, Steven (2015): Global Democratic Theory: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  23. Brown, Mark B. (2006): Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (2), 203–225. Open Google Scholar
  24. Brunnengräber, Achim (2011): Das Klimaregime: Globales Dorf oder sozial umkämpftes, transnationales Terrain?, in: Brunnengräber, Achim (Hrsg.): Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes: NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 17–44. Open Google Scholar
  25. Brunnengräber, Achim (2013): Zwischen Pragmatismus und Radikalisierung: NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der internationalen Klimapolitik, in: Dietz, Matthias/Garrelts, Heiko (Hrsg.): Die internationale Klimabewegung: Ein Handbuch, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 357–372. Open Google Scholar
  26. Bürgerrat Deutschlands Rolle (o.J.): Fünf-Minuten-Info, in: Bürgerrat Deutschlands Rolle Website, https://deutschlands-rolle.buergerrat.de/buergerrat/fuenf-minuten-info/ (04.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  27. Bürgler, Beatrice (2009): Demokratische Legitimität in der internationalen Umweltpolitik, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  28. Bulkeley, Harriet/Newell, Peter (2015): Governing Climate Change, 2. Aufl., London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  29. Carrington, Damian (2019): Why the Guardian is changing the language it uses about the environment: From now, house style guide recommends terms such as ‘climate crisis’ and ‘global heating’, in: The Guardian Online, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/may/17/why-the-guardian-is-changing-the-language-it-uses-about-the-environment (19.03.2020). Open Google Scholar
  30. CAT (Climate Action Tracker) (2020a): Paris Agreement turning Point, December 2020, https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/829/CAT_2020-12-01_ _Briefing_GlobalUpdate_Paris5Years_Dec2020.pdf (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  31. CAT (Climate Action Tracker) (2020b): A government roadmap for addressing the climate and post COVID-19 economic crises, Update April 2020, https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/706/CAT_2020-04-27_Briefing_COVID19_Apr2020.pdf (30.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  32. Chambers, Simone (2003): Deliberative Democratic Theory, in: Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326. Open Google Scholar
  33. Chambers, Simone (2004): Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 12 (4), 389–410. Open Google Scholar
  34. Christiano, Thomas (2015): Disagreement and the justification of democracy, in: Wall, Steven (Hrsg.): The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–260. Open Google Scholar
  35. Climate Assembly UK (2020): News: UK path to net zero must be underpinned by education, choice, fairness and political consensus, urges Climate Assembly, 10 Sep 2020, https://www.climateassembly.uk/news/uk-path-net-zero-must-be-underpinned-education-choice-fairness-and-political-consensus-urges-climate-assembly/index.html (03.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  36. Climate Emergency Declaration (2021): Climate emergency declarations in 1,868 jurisdictions and local governments cover 820 million citizens, https://climateemergencydeclaration.org/climate-emergency-declarations-cover-15-million-citizens/ (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  37. Crutzen, Paul J./Stroemer, Eugene F. (2000): The Anthropocene, in: International Geosphere-Biosphere Programm Newsletter, 41, 17–18. Open Google Scholar
  38. CSPO (Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes at Arizona State University) (2020): Global Citizens’ Assembly on Genome Editing, in: CSPO Website, https://cspo.org/research/gene-editing/genome-citizens-assembly/ (24.06.2020). Open Google Scholar
  39. Curato, Nicole/Böker, Marit (2016): Linking mini-publics to the deliberative system: a research agenda, in: Policy Sciences, 49, 173–190. Open Google Scholar
  40. Curato, Nicole/Hammond, Marit/Min, John B. (2019): Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums, Systems, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  41. Curato, Nicole/Dryzek, John S./Ercan, Selen A./Hendriks, Carolyn M./Niemeyer, Simon (2017): Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research, in: Deadalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, 146 (3), 28–38. Open Google Scholar
  42. Dahl, Robert A. (1989): Democracy and its Critics, New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  43. Dahl, Robert A. (1999): Can International Organizations Be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View, in: Shapiro, Ian/Hacker-Cord, Casiano (Hrsg.): Democracy’s Edges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19–36. Open Google Scholar
  44. Davies, Celia/Wetherell, Margaret/Barnett, Elizabeth (2006): Citizens at the Centre: Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions, Bristol: Policy Press. Open Google Scholar
  45. Deutscher Bundestag (2019): Alters- und Sozialstruktur (Datenhandbuch), in: Deutscher Bundestag Website, https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/parlamentsarchiv/datenhandbuch/03/kapitel-03-475934 (22.06.2020). Open Google Scholar
  46. Devaney, Laura/Torney, Diarmuid/Brereton, Pat/Coleman, Martha (2020): Ireland’s Citizens’ Assembly on Climate Change: Lessons for Deliberative Public Engagement and Communication, in: Environmental Communication, 14 (2), 141–146. Open Google Scholar
  47. Deveaux, Monique (2018): Deliberative Democracy and Multiculturalism, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156–170. Open Google Scholar
  48. Dryzek, John S. (2000): Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  49. Dryzek, John S. (2009): The Australian Citizens’ Parliament: A World First, in: Papers on Parliament No. 51, June 2009, https://www.aph.gov.au/~/~/link.aspx?_id=E03B9D7AA31049C2AD126EBD7AC3247E&_z=z (15.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  50. Dryzek, John S. (2010): Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  51. Dryzek, John S. (2011): Global Democratization: Soup, Society, or System?, in: Ethics & International Affairs, 25 (2), 211–234. Open Google Scholar
  52. Dryzek, John S./Niemeyer, Simon (2008): Discursive Representation, in: American Political Science Review, 102 (4), 481–493. Open Google Scholar
  53. Dryzek, John S./Pickering, Jonathan (2019): The Politics of the Anthropocene, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  54. Dryzek, John S./Pickering, Jonathan (2020): Democratic Theory Must Escape the Holocene – Democracy in the Anthropocene: Critical Exchange with Marit Hammond, in: Contemporary Political Theory, 19 (1). 127–141. Open Google Scholar
  55. Dryzek, John S./Stevenson, Hayley (2011): Global democracy and earth system governance, in: Ecological Economics, 70 (11), 1865–1874. Open Google Scholar
  56. Dryzek, John S./Bächtiger, André/Milewicz, Karolina (2011): Toward a Deliberative Global Citizens’ Assembly, in: Global Policy, 2 (1), 33–42. Open Google Scholar
  57. Dryzek, John S./Bowman, Quinlan/Kuyper, Jonathan/Pickering, Jonathan/Sass, Jensen/Stevenson, Hayley (2019): Deliberative Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  58. EC (European Commission) (2020): Shaping the Conference on the Future of Europe: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Brussels 22.1.2020, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/communication-conference-future-of-europe-january-2020_en.pdf (13.04.2020). Open Google Scholar
  59. Eckersley, Robyn (1999): The Discourse Ethic and the Problem of Representing Nature, in: Environmental Politics, 8 (2), 24–49. Open Google Scholar
  60. Elsässer, Lea/Schäfer, Armin (2016): Group Representation for the Working Class? Opinion Differences among Occupational Groups in Germany, in: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung: MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/3, https://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp16-3.pdf (12.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  61. Extinction Rebellion Deutschland (o.J.): Unsere Forderungen, https://extinctionrebellion.de/wer-wir-sind/unsere-forderungen/ (07.04.2020). Open Google Scholar
  62. Falkner, Robert (2016): The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics, in: International Affairs, 92 (5), 1107–1125. Open Google Scholar
  63. Farrell, David M./Suiter, Jane/Harris, Clodagh (2019): ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: the 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland, in: Irish Political Studies, 34 (1), 113–123. Open Google Scholar
  64. Farrell, David M./Curato, Nicole/Dryzek, John S./Geißel, Brigitte/Grönlund, Kimmo/Marien, Sofie/Niemeyer, Simon/Pilet, Jean-Benoit/Renwick, Alan/Rose, Jonathan/Setälä, Maija/Suiter, Jane (2019): Deliberative Mini-Publics: Core Design Features, in: Centre for Deliberative Democracy & Global Governance, Working Paper Series No. 2019/5, https://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/magma/media/upload/ckeditor/files/Deliberative%20Mini-Publics%20Core%20Design%20Features.pdf (15.05.2020). Open Google Scholar
  65. Farrell, David M./Suiter, Jane/Harris, Clodagh/Cunningham, Kevin (2020): The Effects of Mixed Membership in a Deliberative Forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014, in: Political Studies, 68 (1), 54–73. Open Google Scholar
  66. Fischer, Frank (1990): Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise, Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
  67. Fischer, Frank (2017): Climate Crisis and the Democratic Prospect: Participatory Governance in Sustainable Communities, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  68. Fishkin, James S. (2009): When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy & Public Consultation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  69. Fishkin, James S. (2018): Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  70. Fishkin, James S./He, Baogang/Luskin, Robert C/Siu, Alice (2010): Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China, in: British Journal of Political Science, 40, 435–448. Open Google Scholar
  71. Fraser, Nancy (2007): Die Transnationalisierung der Öffentlichkeit: Legitimität und Effektivität der öffentlichen Meinung in einer postwestfälischen Welt, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 224–253. Open Google Scholar
  72. Freedom House (2019): Democracy in Retreat: Freedom in the World 2019, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Feb2019_FH_FITW_2019_Report_ForWeb-compressed.pdf (28.03.2020). Open Google Scholar
  73. Frey, Bruno S./Stutzer, Alois (2006): Strengthening the citizens’ role in international organizations, in: The Review of International Organizations, 1, 27–43. Open Google Scholar
  74. Fung, Archon (2003): Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11 (3), 338–367. Open Google Scholar
  75. Future Earth/Earth League (2019): Climate Insights, in: United in Science: High-level synthesis report of latest climate science information convened by the Science Advisory Group of the UN Climate Action Summit 2019, https://ane4bf-datap1.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wmocms/s3fs-public/ckeditor/files/United_in_Science_ReportFINAL_0.pdf?XqiG0yszsU_sx2vOehOWpCOkm9RdC_gN (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  76. G100 (o.J.): Plattform für demokratische Innovation, in: G100 Website, www.g1000.org/de/ (01.08.2020). Open Google Scholar
  77. Garton Ash, Timothy/Zimmermann, Antonia (2020): In Crisis, Europeans Support Radical Positions: Climate Change and Social Welfare issues most salient, in: Opinions, Moods and Preferences of European Citizens (Beta), Bertelsmann Stiftung, https://eupinions.eu/de/text/in-crisis-europeans-support-radical-positions (29.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  78. Gastil, John/Wright, Erik Olin (2019): Legislature by Lot: Envisioning Sortition Within a Bicameral System, in: Gastil, John/Wright, Erik Olin (Hrsg.): Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance, London & New York: Verso, 3–38. Open Google Scholar
  79. Geißel, Brigitte/Freise, Matthias (2016): Zivilgesellschaft und soziale Bewegungen in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft, in: Lauth, Hans-Joachim/Kneuser, Marianne/Pickel, Gert (Hrsg.): Handbuch Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
  80. Global Assembly (2020): About, in: Global Assembly Website, https://globalassembly.org/about (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  81. Goodin, Robert E. (1992): Green Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  82. Goodin, Robert E. (2010): Global democracy: in the beginning, in: International Theory, 2 (2), 175–209. Open Google Scholar
  83. Goodin, Robert E./Dryzek, John S. (2006): Deliberative Impacts: The Macro-Political Uptake of Mini-Publics, Politics & Society, 34 (2), 219–244. Open Google Scholar
  84. Grande, Edgar (1996): Demokratische Legitimation und europäische Integration, in: Leviathan, 24 (3), 339–360. Open Google Scholar
  85. Grönlund, Kimmo/Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija (2014): Introduction, in: Grönlund, Kimmo/Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija (Hrsg.): Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press, 1–8. Open Google Scholar
  86. Grönlund, Kimmo/Strandberg, Kim/Himmelroos, Staffan (2009): The challenge of deliberative democracy online – A comparison of face-to-face and virtual experiments in citizen deliberation, in: Information Polity, 14, 187–201. Open Google Scholar
  87. Guillot, Louise (2020): Macron announces referendum to add environmental protection to the constitution, December 14, 2020, in: Politico Online, https://www.politico.eu/article/macron-agrees-to-add-environmental-protection-as-a-constitutional-duty/ (04.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  88. Gupta, Joyeeta (2014): The History of Global Climate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  89. Guterres, António (2019): UN Secretary-General's remarks at pre-COP25 press conference [as delivered], 01 December 2019, in United Nations Secretary-General Online, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/press-encounter/2019-12-01/un-secretary-generals-remarks-pre-cop25-press-conference-delivered (24.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  90. Gutmann, Amy/Thompson, Dennis (2004): Why Deliberative Democracy?, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  91. Haas, Peter M. (1992): Banning chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone, in: International Organization, 46 (1), 187–224. Open Google Scholar
  92. Habermas, Jürgen (1982): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, 2. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  93. Habermas, Jürgen (1995): Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  94. Habermas, Jürgen (1996): Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie, in: Habermas, Jürgen (Hrsg.): Die Einbeziehung des Anderen: Studien zur politischen Theorie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  95. Habermas, Jürgen (1998): Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  96. HAC (High Ambition Coalition) (2018): Statement on Stepping up Climate Ambition, Press Statement, 12 December 2018, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/news/20181211_statement_en.pdf (10.04.2020). Open Google Scholar
  97. Hacke, Christian (2011): Macht, in: Woyke, Wichard (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch Internationale Politik, 12. überarbeitete und aktualisierte Aufl., Opladen & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich, 324–338. Open Google Scholar
  98. Hajer, Maarten/Versteeg, Wytske (2005): A Decade of Discourse Analysis of Environmental Politics: Achievements, Challenges, Perspectives, in: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7 (3), 175–184. Open Google Scholar
  99. Hammond, Marit (2020): What is the Value of Deliberative Democracy in the Anthropocene?, Hammond, Marit/Dryzek, John/Pickering, Jonathan: Democracy in the Anthropocene: Critical Exchange, in: Contemporary Political Theory, 19 (1). 127–141. Open Google Scholar
  100. Hanusch, Frederic (2018): Democracy and Climate Change, London & New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  101. Harris, Clodagh (2019): Mini-publics: design choices and legitimacy, in: Elstub, Stephen/Escobar, Oliver (Hrsg.): Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 45–59. Open Google Scholar
  102. Heilbroner, Robert L. (1974): An Inquiry Into the Human Prospect, New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Open Google Scholar
  103. Held, David (1995): Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  104. Hertsgaard, Mark (2019): 'We're losing the race': UN secretary general calls climate change an 'emergency', in: The Guardian Online, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/18/un-secretary-general-climate-crisis-trump (24.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  105. Hickman, Leo (2010): James Lovelock on the value of sceptics and why Copenhagen was doomed, in: The Guardian Online, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/mar/29/james-lovelock (23.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  106. Holdo, Markus (2020): Meta-deliberation: everyday acts of critical reflection in deliberative systems, in: Politics, 40 (1), 106–119. Open Google Scholar
  107. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2018): Summary for Policymakers, in: Masson-Delmotte, Valérie/Zhai, Panmao/Pörtner, Hans-Otto/Roberts, Debra C./Skea, James/Shukla, Priyadarshi R./Pirani, Anna/Moufouma-Okia, Wilfran/Péan, C./Pidcock, Roz/Connors, Sarah/Matthews, J.B. Robin/Chen, Yang/Zhou, X./Gomis, M.I./Lonnoy, E./Maycock, T./Tignor, M./Waterfield, T. (Hrsg.): Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdf (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  108. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2019a): Summary for Policymakers, in: Shukla, Priyadarshi R./Skea, James/Calvo Buendia, E./Masson-Delmotte, Valérie/Pörtner, Hans-Otto/Roberts, Debra C./Zhai, Panmao/Slade, R./Connors, Sarah/van Diemen, Renée/Ferrat, Marion/Haughey, Eamon/Luz, S./Neogi, Suvadip/Pathak, Minal/Petzold, Jan/Portugal Pereira, Joana/Vyas, P./Huntley, E./Kissick, K./Belkacemi, M./Malley, J. (Hrsg.): Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/11/02_Summary-for-Policymakers_SPM.pdf (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  109. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2019b): Summary for Policymakers, in: Pörtner, Hans-Otto/Roberts, Debra C./Masson-Delmotte, Valérie/Zhai, Panmao/Tignor, M./Poloczanska, Elvira/Mintenbeck, Katja/Alegría, Andrés/Nicolai, Maike/Okem, Andrew/Petzold, Jan/Rama, B./Weyer, Nora M. (Hrsg.): IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/03_SROCC_SPM_FINAL.pdf (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  110. Jamieson, Dale (2017): Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed and What it Means for Our Future, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  111. Jörke, Dirk (2019): Die Größe der Demokratie: Über die räumliche Dimension von Herrschaft und Partizipation, Berlin: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  112. Kachi, Aya/Bernauer, Thomas/Gampfer, Robert (2015): Climate policy in hard times: Are the pessimists right?, in: Ecological Economics, 114, 227–241. Open Google Scholar
  113. Keohane, Robert O. (2006): Accountability in World Politics, in: Scandinavian Political Studies, 29 (2), 75–87. Open Google Scholar
  114. Keohane, Robert O./Macedo, Stephen/Moravcsik, Andrew (2009): Democracy-Enhancing Multilateralism, in: International Organization, 63, 1–33. Open Google Scholar
  115. Kuyper, Jonathan/Schroeder, Heike/Linnér, Björn-Ola (2018): The Evolution of the UNFCCC, in: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 43, 343–368. Open Google Scholar
  116. Lafont, Cristina (2020): Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  117. Lafont, Cristina (2021): Deliberative Minipublics and the Populist Conception of Representation as Embodiment, unveröffentlichtes Manuskript. Open Google Scholar
  118. Landwehr, Claudia (2010): Discourse and Coordination: Modes of Interaction and their Roles in Political Decision-Making, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), 101–122. Open Google Scholar
  119. Landwehr, Claudia (2012): Demokratische Legitimation durch rationale Kommunikation: Theorien deliberativer Demokratie, in: Lembcke, Oliver W./Ritzi, Claudia/Schaal Gary S. (Hrsg.): Zeitgenössische Demokratietheorie Band 1: Normative Demokratietheorie, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 355–386. Open Google Scholar
  120. Landwehr, Claudia (2014): Facilitating Deliberation: The Role of Impartial Intermediaries in Deliberative Mini-Publics, in: Grönlund, Kimmo/Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija (Hrsg.): Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press, 77–92. Open Google Scholar
  121. Landwehr, Claudia (2015): Democratic Meta-Deliberation: Towards Reflective Institutional Design, in: Political Studies, 63 (1), 38–54. Open Google Scholar
  122. Landwehr, Claudia (2017): Disturbances Take Precedence: Why We Need to Regain the Procedural Consensus, in: Items Democracy Papers Series, https://items.ssrc.org/democracy-papers/disturbances-take-precedence-why-we-need-to-regain-the-procedural-consensus/ (01.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  123. Landwehr, Claudia (2020): Deliberative Beteiligungsformen, in: Faas, Thorsten/Gabriel, Oscar W./Maier, Jürgen (Hrsg.): Politikwissenschaftliche Einstellungs- und Verhaltensforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 413–436. Open Google Scholar
  124. Landwehr, Claudia (2021): Deliberative Theory, in: Riddervold, Marianne/Trondal, Jarle/Newsome, Akasemi (Hrsg.): The Palgrave Handbook of EU Crises, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 213–228. Open Google Scholar
  125. Landwehr, Claudia/Schäfer, Armin (2020): Populist, Technocratic, and Authoritarian Responses to Covid-19, in: Items Paper Series: Covid-19 and the Social Sciences, https://items.ssrc.org/covid-19-and-the-social-sciences/democracy-and-pandemics/populist-technocratic-and-authoritarian-responses-to-covid-19/ (01.08.2020). Open Google Scholar
  126. Lane, Melissa (2016): Political Theory on Climate Change, in: Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 107–123. Open Google Scholar
  127. Lange, Andreas/Löschel, Andreas/Vogt, Carsten/Ziegler, Andreas (2010): On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations, in: European Economic Review, 54, 359–375. Open Google Scholar
  128. Latour, Bruno (2010): Das Parlament der Dinge: Für eine politische Ökologie, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  129. Leggewie, Claus (2011): 2050: Die demokratische Frage heute, in: Schüttemeyer, Suzanne S. (Hrsg.): Politik im Klimawandel: Keine Macht für gerechte Lösungen?, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 25–39. Open Google Scholar
  130. Lenton, Timothy, M./Rockström, Johan/Gaffney, Owen/Rahmstorf, Stefan/Richardson, Katherine/Steffen, Will/Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim (2019): Climate tipping points – too risky to bet against (Comment), in: Nature, 575, 592–595. Open Google Scholar
  131. Levin, Kelly/Cashore, Benjamin/Bernstein, Steven/Auld, Graeme (2012): Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change, in: Policy Sciences, 45, 123–152. Open Google Scholar
  132. Lindell, Marina/Bächtiger, André/Grönlund, Kimmo/Herne, Kaisa/Setälä, Maija/Wyss, Dominik (2017): What drives the polarisation and moderation of opinions? Evidence from a Finnish citizen deliberation experiment on immigration, in: European Journal of Political Research, 56, 23–45. Open Google Scholar
  133. List, Christian/Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias (2010): Can There Be a Global Demos? An Agency-Based Approach, in: Philosophy & Public Affairs, 38 (1), 76–110. Open Google Scholar
  134. MacKenzie, Michael K. (2018): Deliberation and Long-Term Decisions: Representing Future Generations, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251–270. Open Google Scholar
  135. Manin, Bernard (1997): The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  136. Mansbridge, Jane (2009): A “Selection Model” of Political Representation, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 17 (4), 369–398. Open Google Scholar
  137. Mansbridge, Jane (2010): Deliberative Polling as the Gold Standard, in: The Good Society, 19 (1), 55–62. Open Google Scholar
  138. Mansbridge, Jane/Bohman, James/Chambers, Simone/Christiano, Thomas/Fung, Archon/Parkinson, John/Thompson, Dennis F./Warren, Mark E. (2012): A systemic approach to deliberative democracy, in: Parkinson, John/Mansbridge, Jane (Hrsg.): Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–26. Open Google Scholar
  139. Maus, Ingeborg (2007): Verfassung oder Vertrag: Zur Verrechtlichung globaler Politik, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 350–382. Open Google Scholar
  140. Mayntz, Renate (2008): Von der Steuerungstheorie zu Global Governance, in: Schuppert, Gunnar Folke/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt: PVS Sonderheft 41, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 43–60. Open Google Scholar
  141. McGrew, Anthony (2002): Transnational Democracy, in: Carter, April/Stokes, Geoffrey (Hrsg.): Democratic Theory Today: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge: Polity Press, 269–294. Open Google Scholar
  142. McNeill, J.R./Engelke, Peter (2014): The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945, Cambridge & London: The Belknap Press of Havard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  143. Mellier-Wilson, Claire (2020): Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: What can we learn from the French Citizens’ Assembly on climate change?, in: involve Website, https://www.involve.org.uk/resources/blog/opinion/convention-citoyenne-pour-le-climat-what-can-we-learn-french-citizens (13.04.2020). Open Google Scholar
  144. Miller, David (1997): On Nationality, Oxford: Claredon Press. Open Google Scholar
  145. Miller, David (2010): Against Global Democracy, in: Breen, Keith/O’Neill, Shane (Hrsg.): After the Nation? Critical Reflections on Nationalism and Postnationalism, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 141–160. Open Google Scholar
  146. Nasiritousi, Naghmeh/Bäckstrand, Karin (2019): International Climate Politics in the Post-Paris Era, in: Nordic Economic Policy Review 2019: Climate Policies in the Nordics, 12, 21–62. Open Google Scholar
  147. Neblo, Michael A. (2007): Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring Deliberation, in: Swiss Political Science Review, 13 (4), 527–557. Open Google Scholar
  148. Newell, Peter/Taylor, Olivia (2020): Fiddling while the planet burns? COP25 in perspective, in: Globalizations, 1–13, doi: 10.1080/14747731.2020.1726127. Open Google Scholar
  149. Niemeyer, Simon (2013): Democracy and Climate Change: What Can Deliberative Democracy Contribute?, in: Australian Journal of Politics and History, 59 (3), 429–448. Open Google Scholar
  150. Niessen, Christoph/Reuchamps, Min (2019): Designing a Permanent Deliberative Citizens’ Assembly: The Ostbelgien Modell in Belgium, in: Centre for Deliberative Democracy & Global Governance, Working Paper Series No. 2019/6, http://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/magma/media/upload/ckeditor/files/Designing%20a%20permanent%20deliberative%20citizens%20assembly.pdf (27.05.2020). Open Google Scholar
  151. Offe, Claus (2008): Governance – „Empty signifier“ oder sozialwissenschaftliches Forschungsprogramm?, in: Schuppert, Gunnar Folke/Zürn, Michael (Hrsg.): Governance in einer sich wandelnden Welt, PVS Sonderheft 41, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 61–76. Open Google Scholar
  152. Omelicheva, Mariya Y. (2009): Global Civil Society and Democratization of World Politics: A Bona Fide Relationship or Illusory Liaison?, in: International Studies Review, 11, 109–132. Open Google Scholar
  153. Ophuls, William (1977): Ecology and the Politics of Scarcity, San Francisco: Freeman. Open Google Scholar
  154. Oreskes, Naomi/Conway, Erik M. (2010): Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, New York: Bloomsbury Press. Open Google Scholar
  155. Ostrom, Elinor (2014): A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change, in: Annals of Economics and Finance, 15 (1), 97–134. Open Google Scholar
  156. Parkinson, John (2006): Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  157. Pickering, Jonathan/Barry, Christian (2012): On the concept of climate debt: its moral and political value, in: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15 (5), 667–685. Open Google Scholar
  158. Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel (1967): The Concept of Representation, Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
  159. Popovich, Nadja/Albeck-Ripka, Livia/Pierre-Louis, Kendra (2019): 95 Environmental Rules Being Rolled Back Under Trump, in: New York Times Online, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/climate/trump-environment-rollbacks.html (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  160. Rask, Mikko/Worthington, Richard (2012): Towards a New Concept of Global Governance, in: Rask, Mikko/Worthington, Richard/Lammi, Minna (Hrsg.): Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, Abingdon: Earthscan by Routledge, 3–29. Open Google Scholar
  161. Rask, Mikko/Worthington, Richard/Lammi, Minna (2012): Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, Abingdon: Earthscan by Routledge Open Google Scholar
  162. Rask, Mikko/Bedsted, Bjørn/Andersson, Edward/Kallio, Liisa (2019): Democratic innovation in transnational and global governance, in: Elstub, Stephen/Escobar, Oliver (Hrsg.): Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 354–369. Open Google Scholar
  163. Rawls, John (1996): Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  164. Rawls, John (2014): Gerechtigkeit als Fairneß: Ein Neuentwurf, 4. Aufl., Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar
  165. Riedy, Chris,/Herriman, Jade (2011): Deliberative Mini-publics and the Global Deliberative System: Insights from an Evaluation of World Wide Views on Global Warming in Australia, in: PORTAL: Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies, 8 (3), 1–29. Open Google Scholar
  166. Ripple, William J./Wolf, Christopher/Newsome, Thomas M./Barnard, Phoebe/Moomaw, William R. (2020): World Scientists’ Warning of a Climate Emergency, in: BioScience, 70 (1), 8–12. Open Google Scholar
  167. Risse, Thomas (2000): „Let’s Argue!“: Communicative Action in Wold Politics, in: International Organization, 54 (1), 1–39. Open Google Scholar
  168. Risse, Thomas (2007): Global Governance und kommunikatives Handeln, in: Niesen, Peter/Herborth, Benjamin (Hrsg.): Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jürgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 57–87. Open Google Scholar
  169. Rittel, Horst W. J./Webber, Melvin M. (1973): Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, in: Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Open Google Scholar
  170. Robiou du Pont, Yann/Meinshausen, Malte (2018): Warming assessment of the bottom-up Paris Agreement emissions pledges, in: Nature Communications, 9, 1–10. Open Google Scholar
  171. Roseneck, Michael (2018): Nation, Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit: Grenzen der Demokratisierung durch Nationalisierung, in: Masala, Carlo (Hrsg.): Zur Lage der Nation: Konzeptionelle Debatten, gesellschaftliche Realitäten, internationale Perspektiven, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 109–130. Open Google Scholar
  172. Ryan, Matthew/Smith, Graham (2014): Defining Mini-Publics, in: Grönlund, Kimmo/Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija (Hrsg.): Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press, 9–26. Open Google Scholar
  173. Samaniego, Luis/Thober, Stefan/Kumar, Rohini/Wanders, Niko/Rakovec, Oldrich/Pan, Ming/Sheffield, Justin/Wood, Eric F./Marx, Andreas (2018): Anthropogenic warming exacerbates European soil moisture droughts, in: Nature Climate Change, 8 (5), 421–426. Open Google Scholar
  174. Saretzki, Thomas (1994): Technokratie, Technokratiekritik und das Verschwinden der Gesellschaft. Zur Diskussion um das andere politische Projekt der Moderne, in: Greven, Michael Th./Kühler, Peter/Schmitz, Manfred (Hrsg.): Politikwissenschaft als Kritische Theorie. Festschrift für Kurt Lenk, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 353–386. Open Google Scholar
  175. Saretzki, Thomas (2011): Der Klimawandel und die Problemlösungsfähigkeit der Demokratie, in: Schüttemeyer, Suzanne S. (Hrsg.): Politik im Klimawandel: Keine Macht für gerechte Lösungen?, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 41–63. Open Google Scholar
  176. Sass, Jensen (2018): Deliberative Ideals Across Diverse Cultures, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 86–99. Open Google Scholar
  177. Sass, Jensen/Dryzek, John S. (2014): Deliberative Cultures, in: Political Theory, 42 (1), 3–25. Open Google Scholar
  178. Scharpf, Fritz W. (1999): Regieren in Europa: Effektiv und demokratisch?, Frankfurt am Main & New York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  179. Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer (1999): Deliberativer Supranationalismus: Demokratisches Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats, in: Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 6 (2),185–244. Open Google Scholar
  180. Schmalz-Bruns, Rainer (2018): Legitimitätsbedingungen demokratischer Innovationen, in: Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, 31 (1–2), 82–93. Open Google Scholar
  181. Schmidt, Vivian A. (2013): Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisted: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’, in: Political Studies, 61 (1), 2–22. Open Google Scholar
  182. Schneider, Jen/Delborne, Jason (2012): Seeking the Spotlight: WWViews and the US Media Context, in: Rask, Mikko/Worthington, Richard/Lammi, Minna (Hrsg.): Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, Abingdon: Earthscan by Routledge, 241–260. Open Google Scholar
  183. Sen, Amartya (2003): Democracy and Its Global Roots: Why democratization is not the same as westernization, in: The New Republic, 229 (14), 28–35. Open Google Scholar
  184. Setälä, Maija (2017): Connecting deliberative mini-publics to representative decision making, in: European Journal of Political Research, 56, 846–863. Open Google Scholar
  185. Setälä, Maija/Smith, Graham (2018): Mini-Publics and Deliberative Democracy, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 300–314. Open Google Scholar
  186. Seto, Karen C./Davis, Steven J./Mitchell, Ronald B./Stokes, Eleanor C./Unruh, Gregory/Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana (2016): Carbon Lock-In: Types Causes and Policy Implications, in: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 425–452. Open Google Scholar
  187. Shearman, David/Smith, Joseph Wayne (2007): The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy, Westport, Connecticut & London: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
  188. Shine, John (2020): Statement regarding Australian bushfires, in: Australian Academy of Science Online, https://www.science.org.au/news-and-events/news-and-media-releases/statement-regarding-australian-bushfires (19.03.2020). Open Google Scholar
  189. Simonis, Georg (2017): Das Transformationsproblem, in: Simonis, Georg (Hrsg.): Handbuch Globale Klimapolitik, Leiden et al.: Ferndinand Schöningh, 91–136. Open Google Scholar
  190. Smith, Graham (2003): Deliberative Democracy and the Environment, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  191. Smith, Graham (2009): Democratic Innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  192. Smith, William (2013): Anticipating Transnational Publics: On the Use of Mini-Publics in Transnational Governance, in: Politics & Society, 41 (3), 461–484. Open Google Scholar
  193. Smith, William (2018): Transnational and Global Deliberation, in: Bächtiger, André/Dryzek, John S./Mansbridge, Jane/Warren, Mark E. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 856–868. Open Google Scholar
  194. Sortition Foundation (o.J.): Why Citizens’ Assemblies? What are Citizens’ Assemblies and how do they work?, in: Sortition Foundation Website, https://www.sortitionfoundation.org/learn#why (01.08.2020). Open Google Scholar
  195. Stein, Tine (2014): Der Klimawandel als Probe auf die Zukunftsfähigkeit der Demokratie, in: Gesang, Bernward (Hrsg.): Kann Demokratie Nachhaltigkeit?, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 47–63. Open Google Scholar
  196. Stevenson, Hayley/Dryzek, John S. (2012a): The legitimacy of multilateral climate governance: a deliberative democratic approach, in: Critical Policy Studies, 6 (1), 1–18. Open Google Scholar
  197. Stevenson, Hayley/Dryzek, John S. (2012b): The discursive democratisation of global climate governance, in: Environmental Politics, 21 (2), 189–210. Open Google Scholar
  198. Stevenson, Hayley/Dryzek, John S. (2014): Democratizing Global Climate Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  199. Stokes, Geoffrey (2006): Critical Theories of Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Citizenship, in: Leib, Ethan J./He, Baogang (Hrsg.): The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China, New York & Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan, 53–73. Open Google Scholar
  200. Strandberg, Kim/Grönlund, Kimmo (2014): Online Deliberation: Theory and Practice in Virtual Mini-Publics, in: Grönlund, Kimmo/Bächtiger, André/Setälä, Maija (Hrsg.): Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, Colchester: ECPR Press, 93–114. Open Google Scholar
  201. Streck, Charlotte (2020): The mirage of Madrid: elusive ambition on the horizon, in: Climate Policy, 20 (2), 143–148. Open Google Scholar
  202. Sturm, Bodo/Vogt, Carla (2018): Umweltökonomik: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, 2. Aufl., Berlin: Springer Gabler. Open Google Scholar
  203. Taylor, Matthew/Watts, Jonathan/Bartlett, John (2019): Climate crisis: 6 million people join latest wave of global protests, in: The Guardian Online, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/27/climate-crisis-6-million-people-join-latest-wave-of-worldwide-protests (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  204. Thompson, Dennis F. (2008a): Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science, in: Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520. Open Google Scholar
  205. Thompson, Dennis F. (2008b): Who should govern who governs? The role of citizens in reforming the electoral system, in: Warren, Mark E./Pearse, Hilary (Hrsg.): Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 20–49. Open Google Scholar
  206. Timperley, Jocelyn (2019): Cop25: What was achieved and where to next?, in: Climate Home News Website, https://www.climatechangenews.com/2019/12/16/cop25-achieved-next/ (17.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  207. Toreti, Andrea/Belward, Alan/Perez-Dominguez, Ignacio/Naumann, Gustavo/Luterbacher, Jürg/Cronie, Ottmar/Seguini, Lorenzo/Manfron, Giacinto/Lopez-Lozano, Raul/Baruth, Bettina/van den Berg, Maurits/Dentener, Frank/Ceglar, Andrej/Chatzopoulos, Thomas/Zampieri, Matteo (2019): The Exceptional 2018 EuropeanWater Seesaw Calls for Action on Adaptation, in: Earth’s Future, 7 (6), 652–663. Open Google Scholar
  208. Tørstad, Vegard/Sælen, Håkon (2018): Fairness in the climate negotiations: what explains variation in parties’ expressed conceptions?, in: Climate Policy, 18 (5), 642–654. Open Google Scholar
  209. UN (United Nations) (2015): Paris Agreement, http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf (29.01.2020). Open Google Scholar
  210. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2019): Emissions Gap Report 2019, Nairobi: UNEP. Open Google Scholar
  211. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (1992): United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  212. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (1998): Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf (20.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  213. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2010): Report of the Conference of the Parties on its fifteenth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 19 December 2009 – Part Two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its fifteenth session: Decisions adopted by the conference of the Parties, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf (03.03.2020). Open Google Scholar
  214. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2015): Adoption of the Paris Agreement: Proposal by the President, https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (02.02.2020). Open Google Scholar
  215. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2020a): Climate Ambition Summit Builds Momentum for COP26, External Press Release/12 Dec, 2020, https://unfccc.int/news/climate-ambition-summit-builds-momentum-for-cop26 (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  216. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2020b): COP Bureau Reschedules UNFCCC Subsidiary Body Meetings to 2021, UN Climate Press Release/23 Jun, 2020, https://unfccc.int/news/cop-bureau-reschedules-unfccc-subsidiary-body-meetings-to-2021 (01.07.2020). Open Google Scholar
  217. UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2021): Status of Ratification of the Convention, https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-convention/status-of-ratification/status-of-ratification-of-the-convention (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  218. Unmüßig, Barbara (2011): NGOs in der Klimakrise: Fragmentierungsprozesse, Konfliktlinien und strategische Ansätze, in: Brunnengräber, Achim (Hrsg.): Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes: NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, 45–58. Open Google Scholar
  219. Valentini, Laura (2014): No Global Demos, No Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique, in: Perspectives on Politics, 12 (4), 789–807. Open Google Scholar
  220. van der Sluijs, Jereon P./van Est, Rinie/Riphagen, Monique (2010): Beyond consensus: reflections from a democratic perspective on the interaction between climate politics and science, in: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 409–415. Open Google Scholar
  221. van Reybrouck, David (2017): Gegen Wahlen: Warum Abstimmen nicht demokratisch ist, 4. Aufl., Göttingen: Wallstein. Open Google Scholar
  222. Victor, David G. (2011): Global Warming Gridlock: Creating More Effective Strategies for Protecting the Planet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  223. Wallace, Gregory/Holmes, Kristen (2021): Biden puts Trump’s climate and environmental rollbacks in his crosshairs, in: CNN Online, https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/20/politics/climate-environment-biden-trump-regulations/index.html (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  224. Warren, Mark E. (2008): Citizen representatives, in: Warren, Mark E./Pearse, Hilary (Hrsg.): Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 50–69. Open Google Scholar
  225. Warren, Mark E./Pearse, Hilary (2008): Introduction: democratic renewal and deliberative democracy, in: Warren, Mark E./Pearse, Hilary (Hrsg.): Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–19. Open Google Scholar
  226. WCC (World Climate Conference) (1979): Proceedings of the World Climate Conference: A Conference of Experts on Climate and Mankind, Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. Open Google Scholar
  227. World Bank (2020): Data: Population, total, in: World Bank Website, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL (24.06.2020). Open Google Scholar
  228. Wright, Jasmine/Duster, Chandelis (2021): John Kerry says current goals under Paris climate agreement 'inadequate' to reduce Earth's temperature, in: CNN Online, https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/31/politics/john-kerry-paris-climate-accord-cnntv/index.html (03.02.2021). Open Google Scholar
  229. WWViews (World Wide Views on Climate and Energy) (2015a): World Wide Views: 10 000 citizens, 97 debates in 76 countries (Report), http://climateandenergy.wwviews.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/07/Synthesis-WWV-EN-web.pdf (16.05.2020). Open Google Scholar
  230. WWViews (World Wide Views on Climate and Energy) (2015b): World Wide Views on Climate and Energy Website, http://climateandenergy.wwviews.org/ (16.05.2020). Open Google Scholar
  231. Young, Iris Marion (1996): Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy, in: Benhabib, Seyla (Hrsg.): Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Politcal, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  232. Young, Iris Marion (2000): Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  233. Zaman, Sharaban Tahura (2018): The ‘bottom-up pledge and review’ approach of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) in the Paris Agreement: A Historical Breakthrough or a setback in new climate governance?, in: IALS Student Law Review, 5 (2), 3–20. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Government & Governance & Administration", "Interest Groups & Lobbying", "Party Research & Electoral Research"
Cover of book: Geschichte des Parlamentarismus
Book Titles No access
Band 3: Vom Thing zur Ständeversammlung
Geschichte des Parlamentarismus
Cover of book: Neureligiöse Bewegungen und das Judentum
Book Titles No access
Antisemitismus, Philosemitismus und Selbstvergewisserung
Neureligiöse Bewegungen und das Judentum
Cover of book: Haltung zeigen – Demokratie stärken
Edited Book Full access
Wirtschafts- und unternehmensethische Perspektiven
Haltung zeigen – Demokratie stärken
Cover of book: Meinungsdynamik und -manipulation durch Social Bots
Book Titles No access
Eine Untersuchung sozialer Online-Netzwerke auf Basis eines agentenbasierten Modells
Meinungsdynamik und -manipulation durch Social Bots

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex