Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Volume Open Access Full access

Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Authors:
Journal:
ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Publisher:
 2020

Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print
1435-439X
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
German
Product type
Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 225 - 226
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 227 - 238
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 239 - 266
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 267 - 294
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 295 - 326
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 327 - 346
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 23 (2020), Edition 2
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 347 - 370
In January 2020, the US and China finally concluded a bilateral trade agreement amidst an ongoing trade war. From the US side, the US-China ‘phase 1’-deal was hailed as a great achievement. The paper critically examines whether and to what...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)

Bibliography (195)

  1. BALDWIN, RICHARD, The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics and the Future of Work, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  2. BALDWIN, RICHARD, The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multi-lateralism, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2016, Vol. 30, S. 95-116 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  3. BOWN, CHAD; KEYNES, SOUMAYA, Why Trump Shot the Sheriffs: The End of WTO Dispute Settlement 1.0, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Working Paper 20-4, Washington, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  4. DOHSE, DIRK; FELBERMAYR, GABRIEL, Zeit für eine neue Industriepolitik?, Kiel Policy Brief 122, Institut für Weltwirtschaft, Kiel, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  5. ETHIER, WILFRED, Theoretical Problems in Negotiating Trade Liberalization, European Journal of Political Economy, 2001, Vol. 17, S. 209-232 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  6. EVENETT, SIMON; FRITZ, JOHANNES, Going It Alone? Trade Policy After Three Years of Populism, Global Trade Alert Report 25, London, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  7. HASKEL, JONATHAN; WESTLAKE, STIAN, Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  8. VON DER LEYEN, URSULA, Mission Letter to Phil Hogan, Commissioner-Designate for Trade, Europäische Kommission, Brüssel, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  9. ZETTELMAYER, JEROMIN, The Return of Economic Nationalism in Germany, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Policy Brief 19-4, Washington, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-227
  10. ANDERSON, HANNAH; GOLDFIELD, LEON, The Cost of Capital in China’s Changing Markets, J. P. Morgan Asset Management Portfolio Insights, 2018, abrufbar unter: https://am.jpmorgan.com/gi/getdoc/1383498222387 (01.07.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  11. CHRISTIANSEN, ARNDT; KNEBEL, JUTTA, § 36 GWB, in: Montag, Frank; Sä- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  12. cker, Franz Jürgen; Bien, Florian; Meier Beck, Peter (Hrsg.),Münchener Kommentar zum Wettbewerbsrecht, 3. Auflage 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  13. ESPINOZA, JAVIER; FLEMING, SAM, Margrethe Vestager examines curbs on non-EU state-backed companies, Financial Times, 16.12.2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  14. FANG, DONG, EU – Price Comparision Methodologies (DS516): Interpretation of Section 15 of China’s WTO Accession Protocol, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Hahn, Michael; Herrmann, Christoph; Müller-Ibold, Till (Hrsg.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments, 2018, S. 107-124 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  15. FERRI, GIOVANNI; LIU, LI-GANG, Honor Thy Creditors Beforan Thy Shareholders: Are the Profits of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises Real?, Asian Economic Papers, 2010, Vol. 9, No. 3, S. 50-71 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  16. HUOTARI, MIKKO; KRATZ, AGATHA, Beyond investment screening Expanding Europe’s toolbox to address economic risks from Chinese state capitalism, Bertelsmann Stiftung Report, October 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  17. KÖRBER, THORSTEN, FKVO, in: Immenga, Ulrich; Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim (Hrsg.), Fusionskontrolle: Kommentar zum Europäischen und Deutschen Kartellrecht Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  18. LARDY, NICOLAS R., The state strikes back : the end of economic reform in China?, Washington DC, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  19. MAIR, STEFAN; STRACK, FRIEDOLIN; SCHAFF, FERDINAND, Partner und Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  20. systemischer Wettbewerber – Wie gehen wir mit Chinas staatlich gelenkter Volkswirtschaft um?, BDI Grundsatzpapier China, Januar 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  21. MESSERLIN, PATRICK A., Should Antidumping Rules Be Replaced by National or International Competition Rules, World Competition, 1994, Vol. 18, No. 3, S. 37-54 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  22. MOLNAR, MARGIT; LU, JIANGYUAN, State-Owned Firms Behind China´s Corporate Dept, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No. 1536, 2019, abrufbar unter: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentp df/?cote=ECO/WKP(2019)5&docLanguage=En (01.07.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  23. MÜLLER, WOLFGANG, The EU’s new Trade defence laws, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Hahn, Michael; Herrmann, Christoph; Müller-Ibold, Till (Hrsg.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments, 2018, S. 45-62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  24. MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL, Antidumping and Competition Law – Common Origin, a Life of their own and Peaceful Coexistence, in: J. Kokott u.a. (Hrsg.), Europäisches, Deutsches und Internationales Kartellrecht, Festschrift für Dirk Schroeder, Köln 2018, S. 541-575 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  25. MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL; HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Die Entwicklung des eu- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  26. ropäischen Außenwirtschaftsrechts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, Vol. 18, S. 749-756 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  27. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN; SACHER, VINZENZ, The new Antidumping methodology of the European Union: A breach of WTO law?, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Hahn, Michael; Herrmann, Christoph; Müller-Ibold, Till (Hrsg.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments, 2018, S. 89-105 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  28. TREBILCOCK, MICHAEL J.; HOWSE ROBERT; ELIASON, ANTONIA, The Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  29. Regulation of International Trade, London, 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  30. URBŠIENĖ, LAIMUTĖ; NEMUNAITYTĖ, VIKTORIJA; ZATULINAS, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  31. ARTŪRAS, Comparison of Premiums of Chinese and European Companies in Merger and Acquisitions in Europe, Organizations & Markets in Emerging Economies, 2015, Vol. 6, No. 2, S. 67-102 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  32. VERMULST, EDWIN; SUD, JUHI DION, The new rules adopted by the European Union to address “significant distortions” in the anti-dumping context, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Hahn, Michael; Herrmann, Christoph; Müller-Ibold, Till (Hrsg.), The Future of Trade Defence Instruments, 2018, S. 63-87 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  33. VINER, JACOB, Dumping: a problem in international trade, Chicago, 1923 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  34. WOOTON, IAN; ZANARDI, MAURIZIO, Trade and Competition Policy: Anti Dumping versus Anti trust, Glasgow, 2002 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  35. WRIGHT, LOGAN; ROSEN, DANIEL, Credit and Credibility: Risks to China´s Economic Resilience, Washington DC, 2018, abrufbar unter: https://csis-prod.s3.a mazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/181003_CreditandCredibility_final.PDF Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  36. ?_WNS0vtP_qsWMtScnNdT.wxxnyEd1pUf (01.07.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-239
  37. AEGIS EUROPE, A Pragmatic Approach to China MES: Wait for the WTO to Decide. Why “mitigation options” don’t work, the risks of a unilateral interpretation of the Protocol and the key pillars of an effective anti-dumping system, abrufbar unter: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5537b2fbe4b0e49a1e30c01c/t/56950f fca12f44b2eb0fc7b2/1452609533236/A+PRAGMATIC+APPROACH+TO+CH INA+MES.pdf (31.01.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  38. BHALA RAJ; KIM, NATHAN DEUCKJOO DJ, The WTO’s Under-Capacity to Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  39. Deal with Global Over-Capacity, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 2019, Vol. 14(1), S. 1-32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  40. BOWN, CHAD P., Anhörung vor der U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 08.06.2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  41. BOWN, CHAD P.; HILLMAN, JENNIFER A., WTO’ing a Resolution to the China Subsidy Problem, Journal of International Economic Law, 2019, Vol. 22(4), S. 557-578 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  42. BUNDESVERBAND DER DEUTSCHEN INDUSTRIE, Partner and Systemic Competitor – How Do We Deal with China’s State-Controlled Economy?, BDI Policy Papers China, Januar 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  43. CARTLAND, MICHEL; DEPARYE, GÉRARD; WOZNOWSKI, JAN, Is Some- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  44. thing Going Wrong in the WTO Dispute Settlement?, Journal of World Trade, 2012, Vol. 46(5), S. 979-1016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  45. CHIANG, TING-WEI, Chinese State-owned Enterprises and WTO’s Anti-subsidy Regime, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 2017, Vol. 49(2), S. 845-886 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  46. CHU, C.Y. CYRUS; LEE, PO-CHING, Three Changes Not Foreseen by WTO Rules Framers Twenty-Five Years Ago, Journal of World Trade, 2019, Vol. 53(6), S. 895-922 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  47. DING, RU, Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise, Journal of World Trade, 2014, Vol. 48(1), S. 167-190 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  48. HILLMAN, JENNIFER A., Anhörung vor der U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 08.06.2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  49. HU, WEINIAN, China as a WTO developing member, is it a problem?, CEPS Policy Insights No. 2019/16, November 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  50. KAZEKI, JUN, The “Middle Pillar”: Transparency and Surveillance of Subsidies in the SCM Committee – Reflections after the global Economic Crisis, Global Trade and Customs Journal, 2010, Vol. 5(5), S. 191-198 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  51. KELLY, BRIAN D., The Offsetting Duty Norm and the Simultaneous Application of Countervailing and Antidumping Duties, Global Economy Journal, 2011, Vol. 11(2), S. 1-31 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  52. LEE, JAEMIN, Trade Agreements’ New Frontier – Regulation of State-Owned Enterprises and Outstanding Systemic Challenges, Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 2019, Vol. 14(1), S. 33-72 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  53. MATSUSHITA, MITSUO, State-Owned Enterprises in the TPP Agreement, in: Chaisse, Julien et al. (Hrsg.), Paradigm Shift in International Economic Rule-making: TPP as a New Model for Trade Agreements?, Springer, 2017, S. 187-203 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  54. MÜLLER, SOPHIA, The Prospects of EU Trade Defence against Chinese Imports after 2016 – Taming the Dragon through Countervailing Duties?, 2015, abrufbar unter: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2665960 (31.01.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  55. MÜLLER, SOPHIA, The Use of Alternative Benchmarks in Anti-Subsidy Law: A Study on the WTO, the EU and China, Springer, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  56. MÜLLER, SOPHIA, Anti-Subsidy Investigations Against China: The “Great Leap Forward” in Reforming EU Trade Defence?, in: Bungenberg, Marc et al. (Hrsg.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017, Springer, 2018, S. 125-155 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  57. MÜLLER, WOLFGANG, The EU’s Trade Defence Instruments: Recent Judicial and Policy Developments, in: Bungenberg, Marc et al. (Hrsg.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2017, Springer, 2018, S. 205-225 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  58. QIN, JULIA YA, WTO Regulation of Subsidies to State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  59. – A Critical Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol, Journal of International Economic Law, 2004, Vol. 7(4), S. 863-919 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  60. UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE, 2018 Report to Congress On Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  61. China’s WTO Compliance, Februar 2019, abrufbar unter: https://ustr.gov/sites/d efault/files/2018-USTR-Report-to-Congress-on-China%27s-WTO-Compliance. pdf (31.01.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  62. VAN BAEL & BELLIS, EU Anti-Dumping and Other Trade Defence Instruments, Kluwer, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  63. VERMULST, EDWIN; GATTA, BRIAN, Concurrent Trade Defence Investigations in the EU, the EU‘s new anti-subsidy practice against China, and the Future of Both, World Trade Review, 2012, Vol. 11(3), S. 527-553 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  64. WILLEMYNS, INES, Disciplines on State-Owned Enterprises in International Economic Law: Are We Moving in the Right Direction?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19(3), S. 657-680 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  65. WU, MARK, The “China, Inc.” Challenge to Global Trade Governance, Harvard International Law Journal, 2016, Vol. 57(2), S. 261-342 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  66. ZHOU, WEIHUAN/GOA, HENRY; BAI, XUE, Building A Market Economy Through WTO-Inspired Reform of State-Owned Enterprises in China, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2019, Vol. 68(4), S. 977-1022 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-267
  67. BÄR-BOUYSSIÈRE, BERTOLD, Art. 107 AEUV, in: Schwarze/Becker/Hatje/ Schoo (Hrsg.), EU-Kommentar, Baden-Baden, 4. Aufl. 2019, S. 1501-1702 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  68. BENITAH, MARC, The WTO law of subsidies: a comprehensive approach, Niederlande, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  69. BLAUBERGER, MICHAEL, Staatliche Beihilfen in Europa : Die Integration der Beihilfekontrolle in der EU und die Europäisierung der Beihilfepolitik in den neuen Mitgliedstaaten, Wiesbaden, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  70. BLOCKMANS, STEVEN; HU, WEINIAN, Systemic rivalry and balancing interests: Chinese investment meets EU law on the Belt and Road, CEPS Policy Insights, 2019, No. 4 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  71. BRAUNECK, JENS, Marktortprinzip der DSGVO: Weltgeltung für EU-Datenschutz?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, Vol. 30, No. 12, S. 494-501 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  72. BRAUNECK, JENS, Nationale Industriestrategie 2030 – Europäische Champions mit geltendem EU-Recht vereinbar?, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 2019, No. 20, S. 801-810 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  73. BUENDÍA SIERRA, JOSÉ LUIS, A Brave New World in State Aid?, European State Aid Law Quarterly, 2019, Vol. 18, Nr. 4, S. 443-446 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  74. CAPOBIANCO, ANTONIO; CHRISTIANSEN, HANS, Competitive Neutrality and State-Owned Enterprises: Challenges and Policy Options, OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, 2011, No. 1 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  75. CARTLAND, MICHEL; DEPAYRE, GÉRAD; WOZNOWSKI, JAN, Is Some- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  76. thing Going Wrong in the WTO Dispute Settlement?, Journal of World Trade, 2012, Vol. 46, No. 5, S. 979-1015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  77. COPPENS, DOMINIC, WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints, Cambridge, 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  78. CREMER, HANS-JOACHIM, Art. 107, in: Calliess/Ruffert (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV: das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta: Kommentar, München, 5. Aufl. 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  79. DAWAR, KAMALA, The 2016 European Union International Procurement Instrument’s Amendments to the 2012 Buy European Proposal: A Retrospective Assessment of Its Prospects, Journal of World Trade, 2016, Vol. 50, No. 5, S. 845-865 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  80. DING, RU, Public Body’ or Not: Chinese State-Owned Enterprise, Journal of World Trade, 2014, Vol. 48, No. 1, S. 167-189 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  81. DU, MING, When China's National Champions Go Global: Nothing to Fear but Fear Itself?, Journal of World Trade, 2014, Vol. 48, No. 6, S. 1127-1166 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  82. FLEURY, JULIEN SYLVESTRE; MARCOUX, JEAN-MICHEL, The US Shaping Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  83. of State-Owned Enterprise Disciplines in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19, No. 2, S. 445-465 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  84. FRENZ, WALTER, Beihilfenverbot gegen Trump und May!, Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis, 2017, No. 3, Editorial (3) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  85. FRENZ, WALTER, Die Beihilfenkontrolle in der internationalen Wirtschaft, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht, 2017, No. 4, S. 194-198 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  86. HARTGE, CATHLEEN HAMEL, China´s National Security Review: Motivations and the Implications for Investors, Stanford Journal of International Law, 2013, Vol. 49, No. 1, S. 239-273 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  87. HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Europarechtliche Fragen der deutschen Investitionskontrolle, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 2019, Vol. 22, No. 3, S. 429-476 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  88. HOOK, CHRISTOPHER, Was lange währt wird endlich gut? Die neuen Änderungsverordnungen im Bereich der handelspolitischen Schutzinstrumente, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, Vol. 30, No. 5, S. 188-193 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  89. HORLICK, GARY; CLARKE, PEGGY A., Article Navigation, Rethinking Subsidy Disciplines for the Future: Policy Options for Reform, Journal of International Economic Law, 2017, Vol. 20, No. 3, S. 673-703 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  90. KAUFMANN, MARCEL, GWB § 124, in: Pünder/Schellenberg, Vergaberecht: GWB, VgV, VSVgV, SektVO, VOB/A, KonzVgV, UVgO, Haushaltsrecht, Öffentliches Preisrecht: Handkommentar, Baden-Baden, 3. Aufl. 2019, S. 575-622 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  91. KRENZLER, HORST GÜNTER; HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH; NIESTEDT, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  92. MARIAN, EU-Außenwirtschafts- und Zollrecht, München, 15. EL Oktober 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  93. KREUSCHITZ, VIKTOR, Art. 107 AEUV, in: Säcker (Hrsg.), Münchener Kommentar Europäisches und Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 5: Beihilfenrecht: BeihilfenR, München, 2. Aufl. 2018, S. 49-310 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  94. KRUIS, TOBIAS, Vorbemerkungen zu Art. 101 ff. AEUV, in: Streinz (Hrsg.), EUV/ AEUV: Vertrag über die Europäische Union - Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, München, 3. Aufl. 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  95. KÜHNLING, JÜRGEN, Art. 107 AEUV, in: Streinz (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV: Vertrag über die Europäische Union - Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, München, 3. Aufl. 2018, S. 1328-1414 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  96. LURGER, BRIGITTA, Art. 173 AEUV, in: Streinz (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV: Vertrag über die Europäische Union - Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, München, 3. Aufl. 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  97. LYU, SHUPING; BUTS, CAROLINE; JEGERS, MARC, Comparing China’s Fair Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  98. Competition Review System to EU State Aid Control, European State Aid Law Quarterly, 2019, Vol. 18, No. 1, S. 37-60 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  99. MARTENS, MICHAEL, Brücken, Häfen, Gleise – Freiheit?, Chinas Investitionen im Balkan, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 11.04.2019, abrufbar unter: www.faz Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  100. .net/aktuell/politik/ausland/wie-china-seinen-einfluss-im-balkan-ausbaut-161367 84.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_2 (01.03.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  101. MELO ARAUJO, BILLY A., The EU Deep Trade Agenda, Oxford, 3. Aufl. 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  102. NEUMANN, FELIX, Export des europäischen Beihilferechts: eine Analyse der Europäisierung des internationalen Subventionsrechts durch bilaterale Handelsabkommen, Wiesbaden, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  103. NICOLAIDES, PHEDON, An Important (and so far, Unique) Project of Common European Interest, 12.02.2020, abrufbar unter: http://stateaidhub.eu/blogs/stateai duncovered/post/9610 (15.03.2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  104. NÚNEZ-MÜLLER, MARCO, Finanzielle Transfers und Transaktionen, in: Säcker (Hrsg.), Münchener Kommentar Europäisches und Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 5: Beihilfenrecht: BeihilfenR, München, 2. Aufl. 2018, S. 785-898 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  105. SOLTÉSZ, ULRICH, Art. 107 AEUV, Münchener Kommentar Europäisches und Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht, Band 5: Beihilfenrecht: BeihilfenR, München, 2. Aufl. 2018, S. 49-310 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  106. PAUWELYN, JOOST, Treaty interpretation or activism? Comment on the AB report on United States - ADs and CVDs on Certain Products from China, World Trade Review, 2013, Vol. 12, No. 2, S. 235-241 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  107. PECHSTEIN, MATTHIAS; NOWAK, CARSTEN; HÄDE, ULRICH (Hrsg.), Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  108. Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV Teil: Band 3. AEUV: Artikel 101-215, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  109. RÜCHARDT, CORINNE, Art. 107 AEUV, in: Streinz (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV: Ver- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  110. trag über die Europäische Union - Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union - Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, München, 3. Aufl. 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  111. RUFFERT, MATTHIAS, Art. 173, in: Calliess/Ruffert (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV: das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta: Kommentar, München, 5. Aufl. 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  112. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., The European Union’s Foreign Direct Investment Screening Paradox: Tightening Inward Investment Control to Further External Investment Liberalization, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2019, Vol. 46, No. 2, S. 105-128 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  113. SCHUELKEN, TOBIAS, Der Schutz kritischer Infrastrukturen vor ausländischen Direktinvestitionen in der Europäischen Union. Zum Vorschlag der EU-Kommission für eine Verordnung zur Schaffung eines Rahmens für die Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen – KOM(2017) 487 endg., Europarecht, 2018, No. 5, S. 577-592 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  114. SOKOL, D. DANIEL, Competition Policy and Comparative Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, Birmingham Young University Law Review, 2009, Vol. 2009, No. 6, S. 1712-1812 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  115. SOLKA, SVENJA, Die Industriepolitik der Europäischen Union, Analyse ihres Verhältnisses zur europäischen Wettbewerbspolitik anhand der Regelung des Art. 173 Abs. 3 Uabs.2 AEUV, Tübingen, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  116. SOLTÉSZ, ULRICH, Die Entwicklung des europäischen Beihilferechts im Jahr 2013, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2014, Vol. 25, No. 3, S. 89-96 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  117. SOLTÉSZ, ULRICH, Von „guten“ und „schlechten“ Beihilfen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2005, Vol. 16, No. 13, S. 385 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  118. STUMPF, CORDULA, Titel XVII Industrie, in: Schwarze/Becker/Hatje/Schoo (Hrsg.), EU-Kommentar, Baden-Baden, 4. Aufl. 2019, S. 2347-2356 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  119. SYKES, ALAN O., Countervailing Duty Law: An Economic Perspective, Columbia Law Review, 1989, Vol. 89, No. 2, S. 199-263 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  120. TAUSCHINSKY, ELJALILL; WEISS, WOLFGANG, Unionsinteresse und Bürgernähe in der Handelspolitik, Europarecht, 2018, Vol. 53, No. 1, S. 3-32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  121. WALLENBERG, GABRIELA VON; SCHÜTTE, MICHAEL, Titel VII Art. 107 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  122. Beihilfenverbot; Ausnahmen, in: Grabitz/Hilf/Nettesheim (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union: Kommentar, München, 68. EL Oktober 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  123. WENDLAND, BERNHARD VON, New Rules for State Aid for Research, Development and Innovation ‘Not a Revolution but a Silent Reform’, European State Aid Law Quarterly, 2015, Vol. 14, No. 1, S. 25-50 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  124. WILLEMYNS, INES, Disciplines on State-Owned Enterprises in International Economic Law: Are We Moving in the Right Direction?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19, No. 3, S. 657-680 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  125. WU, YINGYING, Reforming WTO Rules on State-Owned Enterprises, Singapore, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-295
  126. ACKERMANN, THOMAS U.A., Think big? Think twice! EU competition law in the face of calls for European champions, Common Market Law Review,Vol. 56, 2019, S. 329-338 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  127. BECHTOLD, RAINER; BOSCH, WOLFGANG; BRINKER, INGO (Hrsg.), EU- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  128. Kartellrecht, 3. Aufl., München, 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  129. BRAUNECK, JENS, Nationale Industriestrategie 2030 – Europäische Champions mit geltendem EU-Recht vereinbar?, Die öffentliche Verwaltung, 2019, S. 801–811 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  130. BRIGUET, JULIEN, The State's Invisible Hand: Chinese SOEs Facing EU Antitrust Law, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 52, 2018, S. 839–858 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  131. DE KOK, JOCHEM, Chinese SOEs under EU Competition Law, World Competition, Vol. 40, 2017, S. 583–612 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  132. EMCH, ADRIAN, EU merger control complications for Chinese SOE transactions Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  133. – Kluwer Competition Law Blog, 27.05.2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  134. HUYUE ZHANG, ANGELA, The Single Entity Theory: An Antitrust Time-Bomb for Chinese State-Owned Enterprises?, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 8, 2012, S. 805–830 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  135. IMMENGA, ULRICH; MESTMÄCKER, ERNST-JOACHIM; KÖRBER, TORS- Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  136. TEN; SCHWEITZER, HEIKE/ZIMMER, DANIEL (Hrsg.), Wettbewerbsrecht, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  137. 6. Aufl., München, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  138. GRABITZ, EBERHARD; HILF; MEINHARD; NETTESHEIM, MARTIN Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  139. (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, 68. EL. - Stand Oktober 2019 München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  140. LALLEMAND-KIRCHE, GENEVIÈVE; TIXIER, CAROLINE; PIFFAUT, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  141. HENRI, The Treatment of State-owned Enterprises in EU Competition Law: New Developments and Future Challenges, Journal of European Competition Law and Practice, Vol. 8, 2017, S. 295-308 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  142. LIN, LI-WEN, A Network Anatomy of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises – EUI Working Paper RSCAS2017/07 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  143. ODUDU, OKEOGHENE; BAILEY, DAVID, The Single Economic Entity Doctrine in EU Competition Law, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 51, 2014, S. 1721– 1758 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  144. SCHRÖTER, HELMUTH; JAKOB, THINAM; MEDERER, WOLFGANG Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  145. (Hrsg.), Europäisches Wettbewerbsrecht, 2. Aufl., Baden-Baden, 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  146. SVETLICINII, ALEXANDR, The Acquisitions of the Chinese State-Owned Enterprises under the EU Merger Control Regime: Time for Reflection?, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence, 2017, S. 30–36 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  147. TING-WAI, CHIANG, Chinese State-Owned Enterprises and the WTO's Anti-Subsidy Regime, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 49,2018, S. 845– 886 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-327
  148. BACCHUS, JAMES; LESTER, SIMON; ZHU, JIAN, Disciplining China´s Trade Practices at the WTO, Cato Institute Policy Analysis, 15/11/2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  149. BASCHUK, BRYCE, U.S. and China Sign Phase One Trade Deal, Bloomberg, 15/01/2020, available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-15/ u-s-china-sign-phase-one-of-trade-deal-trump-calls-remarkable (03/03/2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  150. BOWN, CHAD P., Unappreciated hazards of the US-China phase one deal, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 21/01/2020, available at: https://www.piie. com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/unappreciated-hazards-us-china-phase-one-deal (03/03/2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  151. BRINKLEY, JOHN, Trump Is Close To Shutting Down The WTO´s Appeals Court, Forbes, 27/09/2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  152. CERUTTI, EUGENIO; CHEN, SHAN; DEB, PRAGYAN; GJONBALAJ, ALBE; HANNAN, SWARNALI A.; MOHOMMAD, ADIL, Managed Trade: What Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  153. Could be Possible Spillover Effects of a Potential Trade Agreement Between the U.S. and China?, IMF Working Paper, 15/11/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  154. CHATZKY, ANDREW, China’s Belt and Road Gets a Win in Italy, Council on Foreign Relations, 27/03/2019, available at: https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/chinas-belt-and-road-gets-win-italy (10/03/2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  155. CHI, MANJIAO, Trade-Plus Effects of WTO Dispute Settlement on China: An Ideal or Illusion?, Journal of World Trade, 2013, Vol. 47, pp. 1349-1384 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  156. CHORZEMPA, MARTIN, Did the US-China phase one deal deliver a win for US financial services?, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 27/01/2020, available at: https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/did Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  157. -us-china-phase-one-deal-deliver-win-us-financial (03/03/2020). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  158. FARAH, PAOLO D., Five Years of China´s WTO Membership, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2006, Vol. 33-3, pp. 263-304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  159. FARDELLA, ENRICO; PRODI, GEORGIO, The Belt and Road Initiative Impact on Europe: An Italian Perspective, China & World Economy, 2017, Vol. 25-5, pp. 125-138 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  160. GLÖCKLE, CAROLINE, The national security diplomacy – the US´ sharpest weapon in fighting its trade war, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  161. HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Europarechtliche Fragen der deutschen Investitionskontrolle, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 2019, Vol. 22-3, pp. 429-476 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  162. HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH; WEIß WOLFGANG; OHLER, CHRISTOPH, Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  163. Welthandelsrecht, 2nd edition, Munich, 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  164. HILLMAN, JENNIFER, Testimony of Jennifer Hillman Before the U.S.-China Economic and Review Security Commission, Hearing on U.S. Tools to Address Chinese Market Distortions, 08/06/2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  165. HUANG, CUI; JI, WENHUA, Understanding China´s Recent Active Moves on WTO Litigation: Rising Legalism and/or Reluctant Response?, Journal of World Trade, 2012, Vol. 46-6, pp. 1281-1308 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  166. JOHNSON, KEITH, 5 Takeaways from Trump’s New China Trade Pact, Foreign Policy, 16/01/2020, available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/16/trump-ne w-china-trade-pact-takeaways/ (10/03/2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  167. JOHNSTON, ALASTAIR IAIN, Is China a Status Quo Power?, Intl. Sec., 2003, Vol. 27-3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  168. JONES, KENT, The Decline of Liberal Trade – Can the ‘Dracula Effect Save It?, World Competition, 1992, Vol. 4, pp. 71-87 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  169. KASKA, KADRI; BECKVARD, HENRIK; MINARIK, TOMAS, Huawei, 5G and Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  170. China as a Security Threat, CCDCOE NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, Tallinn, 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  171. KREIER, JESSE, China NME Case Suspended, IELP Blog, available at: https://ielp. worldtradelaw.net/2019/06/china-nme-case-suspended.html (05/05/2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  172. LASKAI, LORAND, Why Does Everyone Hate Made in China 2025?, Council on Foreign Relations Net Politics Blog, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  173. LAWDER, DAVID, Explainer: Key Issues, Implications of U.S.-China Trade Talks, Reuters, 28/01/2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  174. LAWDER, DAVID; SCHROEDER, PETE, Mnuchin Says Hopes U.S.-China Trade Talks Rearing Final Round, Reuters, 13/04/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  175. LESTER, SIMON; MERCURIO, BRYAN; DAVIES, ARWEL, World Trade Law Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  176. – Text, Materials and Commentary, 3rd edition, Oxford, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  177. LI, XIAOJUN, China´s geoeconomic strategy: China as a trading superpower, LSE IDEAS, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  178. MANDELL, LAUREN, Ins and Outs of the US-China Phase-One Trade Deal, Trade Talks, 18/01/2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  179. MAYEDA, ANDREW; MOHSIN, SALEHA, U.S. Rebukes China for Backing Off Market Embrace, Bloomberg, 30/11/2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  180. McBRIDE, JAMES; CHATZKY, ANDREW, Is ‘Made in China 2025’ a Threat to Global Trade?, Council on Foreign Relations, 07/03/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  181. POCKARD, CLACK, New China Tariffs Will Not Resolve the Trade Dispute, Lawfareblog, 06/02/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  182. RAPPEPORT, ALAN, U.S. Says China Is No Longer a Currency Manipulator, The New York Times, 13/01/2020, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/1 3/us/politics/treasury-china-currency-manipulator-trade.html, (03/03/2020) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  183. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., The European Union’s Foreign Direct Investment Screening Paradox: Tightening Inward Investment Control to Further External Investment Liberalization, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2019, Vol. 46-2, pp. 105-128 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  184. SCHOTT, JEFFERY J.; JUNG, EUJIN, In US-China Trade Disputes, the WTO Usually Sides with the United States, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 12/03/2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  185. SCOTT, JAMES; WILKINSON, RORDEN, China Threat? Evidence From the WTO, Journal of World Trade, 2013, Vol. 47-4, pp. 761-782 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  186. SHAFFER, GREGORY; GAO HENRY, A New Chinese Economic Law Order?, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 2019-32, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  187. SOHLBERG, MARCUS; YVON, ADRIANE, China – Domestic Support for Agricultural Producers (China-Agricultural Producers), DS511, World Trade Review 2019, pp. 531-532. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  188. SUTTER, ROBERT, Barack Obama, XI Jinping and Donald Trump – Pragmatism Fails as U.S.-China Difference Rise in Prominence, American Journal of Chinese Studies, 2017, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 69-85 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  189. VAN DEN BOSSCHE, PETER; ZDOUC, WERNER, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 3rd edition, Cambridge, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  190. VETTER, DARCI, Ins and Outs of the US-China Phase-One Trade Deal, Trade Talks, 18/01/2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  191. VIDIGAL, GERALDO, The Return of Voluntary Export Restraints? How WTO Law Regulates (And Doesn’t Regulate) Bilateral Trade-Restrictive Agreements, Journal of World Trade, 2019, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 187-210 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  192. VOLAND, THOMAS; PETITE, MICHEL, Cybersecurity measures and WTO law, EuZW 2020, pp. 218-233. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  193. WEBSTER, TIMOTHY, Paper Compliance: How China Implements WTO Decisions, Michigan Journal of International Law Issue 35-3/2014, pp. 525, 529-30 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  194. WU, MARK, The „China Inc.” Challenge to Global Trade Governance, Harvard International Law Journal, 2016, Vol. 57-2, pp. 261-324 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347
  195. YANG, YONGZHENG, China´s WTO Accession – The Economics and Politics, Journal of World Trade, 2000, Vol. 34-4, pp. 77-94 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-2-347

Latest issues

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
See all issues
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 4
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 4
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 3
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 3
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 2
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 2
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 1
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 1
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 27 (2024), Heft 4
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 27 (2024), Heft 4

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS

Send suggestion