From Awareness to Commitment in Public Health Campaigns
The Awareness Myth- Authors:
- |
- Publisher:
- 2017
Summary
Attempts to raise awareness on a multitude of health issues may actually be counter-productive and even dangerous to solving contemporary health problems. From Awareness to Commitment in Public Health Campaigns: The Awareness Myth discusses several myths of the benefits of raising awareness. Myleea Hill and Marceline Thompson-Hayes argue that using awareness as an end-point in public health campaigns is misguided and does more harm than good. They offer a model of the current awareness culture that simply leads to an ever-increasing cycle of awareness without behavioral change or sustained participation and support for causes. Then, they demonstrates how three factors (recognition involvement, knowledge-seeking and education, and participation) intersect to create commitment to solving and alleviating health problems through various methods of communication (social media, mass communication, and interpersonal communication).
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2017
- ISBN-Print
- 978-1-4985-3329-4
- ISBN-Online
- 978-1-4985-3330-0
- Publisher
- Lexington, Lanham
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 134
- Product type
- Book Titles
Table of contents
- Contents No access
- Foreword No access
- Acknowledgments No access
- 1 Overview and Introduction No access
- 2 The Awareness Culture No access
- 3 Awareness as Events, Observations, and Amusement No access
- 4 The Awareness as Education Myth No access
- 5 The Awareness Is Enough Myth No access
- 6 The Awareness as Acceptance Myth No access
- 7 The Awareness Is Altruistic Myth No access
- 8 The Awareness Equals Health Myth No access
- 9 The Awareness Myth Model No access
- 10 The Development of the Commitment-Communication Model No access
- Bibliography No access Pages 125 - 130
- Index No access Pages 131 - 132
- About the Authors No access Pages 133 - 134





