ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien

doi:10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2

Search publication

Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print: 1435-439X
ISSN-Online: 2942-3589
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language: German
Product type: Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 24 (2021), Edition 2

Article

Open Access Full access

Page 305 - 340

The EU Takeover Directive from 2004 has attempted to harmonise Takeover Law within the European Union. The UK’s legal framework governing takeovers served as somewhat of a role model for it. Therefore, Brexit gives rise to the question as to...

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2021

Authors:

Download Article (PDF)

Article

Open Access Full access

Page 341 - 366

New developments in genome editing techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9, have raised significant questions before humankind. The promise of CRISPR /Cas9 lies in the ability to make precise edits in the human genome which may help prevent progeny from...

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2021

Authors:

Download Article (PDF)

Bibliography (194 entries)

AXER, PETER, § 3 Sozialrechtsspezifische Grundrechte, in: Schlachter, Mo-nika; Heinig, Hans Michael (Hrsg.), Europäisches Arbeits- und Sozialrecht, Enzyklopädie Europarecht, Band 7, Baden-Baden, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
BRECHMANN, WINFRIED, Art. 45 AEUV, in: Calliess, Christian; Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
EHLERS, DIRK, § 7 Allgemeine Lehren der Grundfreiheiten, in: ders. (Hrsg.), Europäische Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten, 4. Auflage, Berlin, 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
EHLERS, DIRK, § 11 Verhältnis des Unionsrechts zu dem Recht der Mitglied-staaten, in: Schulze, Reiner; Janssen, André; Kadelbach, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
FRANZIUS, CLAUDIO, Art. 4 EUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias; Nowak, Carsten; Häde, Ulrich (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band I, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
FUCHS, MAXIMILIAN, Art. 3 VO (EG) Nr. 883/2004, in: Fuchs, Maximilian (Hrsg.), Europäisches Sozialrecht, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
FUCHS, MAXIMILIAN; KAHIL-WOLFF, BETTINA, Art. 4 VO (EG) Nr. 883/2004, in: Fuchs, Maximilian (Hrsg.), Europäisches Sozialrecht, 7. Aufla-ge, Baden-Baden, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
FUHLROTT, MICHAEL; FISCHER, KATHARINA, Corona: Virale Anpassungen des Arbeitsrechts, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (NZA), Jahrgang 37, 2020, Heft 6, S. 345–349 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
GEULEN, FELIX; SOTHMANN, JANNIS, Entschädigungen nach dem Infekti-onsschutzgesetz – Quarantäne, Kita- und Schulschließung in der Corona-Krise, Arbeitsrecht (ArbR) Aktuell, Jahrgang 12, 2020, Heft 9, S. 217–219 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
GRAMLICH, LUDWIG, Art. 65 AEUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias; Nowak, Cars-ten; Häde, Ulrich (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band II, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
HAAG, MARCEL, Art. 9 EUV, in: von der Groeben, Hans; Schwarze, Jürgen; Hatje, Armin (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht, Band 1, 7. Auflage, Ba-den-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
HÄDE, ULRICH, Art. 2 AEUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias; Nowak, Carsten; Häde, Ulrich (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band II, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
HENSSLER, MARTIN, § 616 BGB, in: Münchener Kommentar zum BGB, Band 5/1, 8. Auflage, München, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
HOHENSTATT, KLAUS-STEFAN; KROIS, CHRISTOPHER, Lohnrisiko und Ent-geltfortzahlung während der Corona-Pandemie, Neue Zeitschrift für Ar-beitsrecht (NZA), Jahrgang 37, 2020, Heft 7, S. 413–418 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KIEßLING, ANDREA, § 2 IfSG, in: Kießling, Andrea (Hrsg.), Infektions-schutzgesetz: IfSG, München, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KINGREEN, THORSTEN, Art. 34 GRCh, in: Calliess, Christian; Ruffert, Mat-thias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KOCHER, EVA, Art. 45 AEUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias; Nowak, Carsten; Häde, Ulrich (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band II, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KOCHER, EVA, Art. 156 AEUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias u.a. (Hrsg.), Frank-furter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band III, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KREBBER, SEBASTIAN, § 2 Das Binnenmarktrecht der Arbeitnehmerfreizü-gigkeit, in: Müller-Graff, Peter-Christian (Hrsg.), Europäisches Wirt-schaftsordnungsrecht, Enzyklopädie Europarecht, Band 4, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KREBBER, SEBASTIAN, § 2 Arbeitsrechtsspezifische Grundrechte, in: Schlachter, Monika; Heinig, Hans Michael (Hrsg.), Europäisches Arbeits- und Sozialrecht, Enzyklopädie Europarecht, Band 7, Baden-Baden, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
KÜMPER, BOAS, § 56 IfSG, in: Kießling, Andrea (Hrsg.), Infektionsschutz-gesetz: IfSG, München, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
LÜBBIG, THOMAS, Art. 168 AEUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias; Nowak, Cars-ten; Häde, Ulrich (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band III, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
MAGIERA, SIEGFRIED, Art. 9 EUV, in: Streinz, Rudolf (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
MÜLLER, STEFAN; BECKER, MARC, Pandemiebedingte Leistungshindernis-se in der Arbeitsrechtspraxis, COVID-19 und Recht (COVuR), 1. Jahrgang, 2020, Heft 3, S. 126–129 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
PACHE, ECKHARD, § 10 Grundfreiheiten, in: Schulze, Reiner; Janssen, André; Kadelbach, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
PREIS, ULRICH; MAZUREK, DANIEL; SCHMID, MATTHIAS, Rechtsfragen der Entgeltfortzahlung in der Pandemie, Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht (NZA), Jahrgang 37, 2020, Heft 17, S. 1137–1143 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
RINZE, JENS; SCHWAB, ROUVEN, Dulde und liquidiere – Staatshaftungs-ansprüche in Coronazeiten, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW), 73. Jahrgang, 2020, Heft 27, S. 1905–1910 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
RIXEN, STEPHAN, § 34 Gleichbehandlung nach Art. 7 Abs. 2 VO (EU) Nr. 492/2011, in: Schlachter, Monika; Heinig, Hans Michael (Hrsg.), Europäi-sches Arbeits- und Sozialrecht, Enzyklopädie Europarecht, Band 7, Baden-Baden, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
SEIFERT, ACHIM, § 40 Arbeitsrecht, in: Schulze, Reiner; Janssen, André; Kadelbach, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
SPIEGEL, BERNARD, Art. 2 VO (EG) Nr. 883/2004, in: Fuchs, Maximilian (Hrsg.), Europäisches Sozialrecht, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
STEINMEYER, HEINZ-DIETRICH, § 41 Sozialrecht, in: Schulze, Reiner; Jans-sen, André; Kadelbach, Stefan (Hrsg.), Europarecht, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
STÖß, JAN; PUTZER, MAX, Entschädigung von Verdienstausfall während der Corona-Pandemie, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW), 73. Jahr-gang, 2020, Heft 21, S. 1465–1470 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
STREINZ, RUDOLF; MICHL, WALTHER, Art. 51 GRCh, in: Streinz, Rudolf (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
TERHECHTE, JÖRG PHILIPP, Art. 114 AEUV, in: Pechstein, Matthias; No-wak, Carsten; Häde, Ulrich (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Band III, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-237
BECKER, ULRICH, Art. 50 EUV, in: Schwarze, Jürgen; Becker, Ulrich; Hatje, Armin; Schoo, Jürgen (Hrsg.), EU-Kommentar, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
BORRIES, REIMER VON, Überlegungen zur Effektivität des Vertragsverletzungsverfahrens, in: Ipsen, Jörn; Stüer, Bernhard (Hrsg.), Festschrift für Hans-Werner Rengeling zum 70. Geburtstag, Köln-München, 2008, S. 485–510 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
BRAUNECK, JENS, EU-Recht, EU-Gerichts- und Verwaltungsverfahren nach dem Brexit?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 967–974 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
BRAUNECK, JENS, Brexit-Urteil des EuGH: Einseitige und missbräuchliche Widerruflichkeit eines EU-Austritts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, 30. Jahrgang, Heft 4, S. 20–26 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
BUCKLER, JULIUS, § 6: Die Regeln zu den Committees, in: Kramme, Malte; Baldus, Christian; Schmidt-Kessel, Martin (Hrsg.), Brexit: Privat- und wirtschaftsrechtliche Folgen, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020, S. 147–163 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
CALLIESS, CHRISTIAN, Art. 13 EUV; Art. 19 EUV; Art. 50 EUV, in: Calliess, Christian; Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
CHALMERS, DAMIAN; DAVIES, GARETH; GIORGIO, MONTI, European Union Law: Text and Materials, 4. Auflage, Cambridge, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
CREMER, HANS-JOACHIM, Art. 258 AEUV, in: Calliess, Christian; Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
DANWITZ, THOMAS VON, § 13: Rechtsschutz der Europäischen Union, in: Hatje, Armin; Müller-Graff, Peter-Christian (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie Europarecht, Band 1, Baden-Baden, 2014, S. 747–793 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
DITTERT, DANIEL, Art. 344 AEUV, in: Groeben, Hans von der; Schwarze, Jürgen; Hatje, Armin (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht, Band 4, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
DÖRR, OLIVER, Art. 50 EUV, Grabitz, Eberhard; Hilf, Meinhard; Nettesheim, Martin (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union: Band I, EUV/AEUV, Losebl. (Stand Dezember 2020), München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
DOUGAN, MICHAEL, An airbag for crashtest-dummies? EU-UK negotiations for a post-withdrawal ‚status quo‘ transitional regime under Article 50 TEU, Common Market Law Review, 2018, Vol. 55, S. 57–100 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
DÖVELING, JOHANNES, § 4: Die Übergangsphase des Brexits, in: Kramme, Malte; Baldus, Christian; Schmidt-Kessel, Martin (Hrsg.), Brexit: Privat- und wirtschaftsrechtliche Folgen, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2020, S. 115–129 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
EHRICKE, ULRICH, Art. 259 AEUV, in: Streinz, Rudolf (Hrsg.), Becksche Kurzkommentare, Band 57, EUV/AEUV, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
FRAU, ROBERT, Ist das Brexit-Abkommen zu Recht gescheitert?, Europarecht, 2019, S. 502–521 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
GERMELMANN, CLAAS FRIEDRICH, § 5: Stellung und Übergangskompetenzen des EuGH im Austrittsabkommen, in: Kramme, Malte; Baldus, Christian; Schmidt-Kessel, Martin (Hrsg.), Brexit: Privat- und wirtschaftsrechtliche Folgen, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden 2020, S. 130–146 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
FÖRSTER, STINE VON, Art. 216 AEUV, in: Groeben, Hans von der; Schwarze, Jürgen; Hatje, Armin (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht, Band 4, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
GUNDEL, JÖRG, § 7: Die Regelungen zur Streitbeilegung, in: Kramme, Malte; Baldus, Christian; Schmidt-Kessel, Martin (Hrsg.), Brexit: Privat- und wirtschaftsrechtliche Folgen, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020, S. 164–178 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
GUNDEL, JÖRG, Die Öffnung des Vorabentscheidungsverfahrens zum EUGH für nicht-mitgliedstaatliche Gerichte, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, 30. Jahrgang, Heft 22, S. 934–938 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
HALTERN, ULRICH, Europarecht – Dogmatik im Kontext, Band II: Rule of Law, Verbunddogmatik, Grundrechte, 3. Auflage, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
HARATSCH, ANDREAS; KOENIG, CHRISTIAN; PECHSTEIN, MATTHIAS, Europarecht, 12. Auflage, Tübingen, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
HATJE, JÜRGEN, Art. 13 EUV, in: Schwarze, Jürgen; Becker, Ulrich; Hatje, Armin; Schoo, Jürgen (Hrsg.), EU-Kommentar, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
HERCHENRÖDER, JAN-HENDRIK, § 2: Auch zwei Jahre nach dem Referendum: Rechtliche Unwägbarkeiten des Brexit zwischen Völker- und Europarecht, in: Kramme, Malte; Baldus, Christian; Schmidt-Kessel, Martin (Hrsg.), Brexit: Privat- und wirtschaftsrechtliche Folgen, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020, S. 56–78 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
JAEGER, THOMAS, Gerichtsorganisation und EU-Recht, Europarecht, 2018, S. 611-652 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
KNAIER, RALF; SCHOLZ, MALTE, Rechtsschutz in Großbritannien und in der EU nach dem „Brexit“, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht, 2018, S. 10–17 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
KOTZUR, MARKUS, § 5: Die Europäische Gerichtsbarkeit, in: Leible, Stefan; Terhechte, Jörg Philipp (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie Europarecht, Band 3, Baden-Baden, 2014, S. 133–152 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
KUMIN, ANDREAS, Vertragsänderungsverfahren und Austrittsklausel, in: Hummer, Waldemar; Obwexer, Walter (Hrsg.), Der Vertrag von Lissabon, Baden-Baden, 2009, S. 302–323 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
MICHL, WALTER, Die formellen Voraussetzungen für den Austritt des Vereinigten Königreichs aus der Europäischen Union, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, 2016, S. 1365–1369 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
MÖGELE, RUDOLF, Art. 216 AEUV, in: Streinz, Rudolf (Hrsg.), Becksche Kurzkommentare, Band 57, EUV/AEUV, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
PRIEBE, REINHARD, Brexit: Noch keine ausreichenden Fortschritte bei den Verhandlungen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2017, 28. Jahrgang, Heft 22, S. 875–876 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
PRIEBE, REINHARD, Brexit: Übergang in die zweite Verhandlungsphase beschlossen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, 29. Jahrgang, Heft 1, S. 3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
PRIEBE, REINHARD, Brexit: Halbzeit, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, S. 347–348 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
PRIEBE, REINHARD, Brexit: Einigung in Brüssel – Drama in London, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 3 f. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
RUFFERT, MATTHIAS, Brexit – oder die Kunst harmonischer Desintegration, Juristenzeitung, 2018, S. 1005–1013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
SCHMIDT-KESSEL, MARTIN, § 3: Grundfragen des Brexit-Austrittsabkommens, in: Kramme, Malte; Baldus, Christian; Schmidt-Kessel, Martin, Brexit (Hrsg.): Privat- und wirtschaftsrechtliche Folgen, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2020, S. 79–114 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
SCHMIDT-KESSEL, MARTIN, Grundfragen des Brexit-Austrittabkommens, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht), 2018, S. 119–130 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
SCHWARZE, JÜRGEN, Die Wahrung des Rechts der Europäischen Union, Deutsche Verwaltungsblätter, 2014, S. 537–543 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
STREINZ, RUDOLF, Art. 13 EUV; Art. 50 EUV in: Streinz, Rudolf (Hrsg.), Becksche Kurzkommentare, Band 57, EUV/AEUV, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
TERHECHTE, JÖRG PHILIPP, Strukturen und Probleme des Brexit-Abkommens, Neue Juristische Wochenschau, 2020, S. 425–430 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
THIELE, ALEXANDER, Der Austritt aus der EU – Hintergründe und rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen eines Brexit, Europarecht, 2016, S. 281–303 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
WEGENER, BERNHARD W, Art. 19 EUV, in: Calliess, Christian; Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
WEGENER, BERNHARD W; KINGREEN, THORSTEN, Art. 344 AEUV, in: Calliess, Christian; Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
WIEDUWILT, SIMON, Article 50 TEU – The Legal Framework of a Withdrawal from the European Union, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 2015, 18. Jahrgang, S. 169–205 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-277
BAUMS, THEODOR, Takeovers versus Institutions in Corporate Governance in Germany, in: Prentice, DD; Holland, PRJ (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Corporate Governance, Oxford, 1996 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
BEBCHUK, LUCIAN, The myth that insulating boards serves longterm value, Columbia Law Review, 2013, Vol. 113, pp. 1637–1694 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
BEKIER, MATHIAS; BOGARDUS, ANNA; OLDHAM TIM, Mastering Revenue Growth in M&A, McKinsey on Finance, 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 1–5 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
BHOJRAJ, SANJEEV; SENGUPTA, PARTHA; ZHANG, SUNING, Takeover Defenses: Entrenchment and Efficiency, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2017, Vol. 63, pp. 142–160 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
BRAUNÖHLER, KONRAD, Hostile Takeovers, European Business Law Review (EBLR), 2001, Vol. 12, pp. 308–316 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
BROUGHMAN, BRIAN; FRIED, JESSE; IBRAHIM, DARIAN, Delaware Law as Lingua Franca: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Law & Economics, 2014, Vol. 57, pp. 865–896 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
CARNEY, WILLIAM; SHEPHERD, GEORGE; SHEPERD BAILEY, JOANNA, Lawyers, Ignorance, and the Dominance of Delaware Corporate Law, Harvard Business Law Review, 2012, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 123–152 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
CARPENTER, WILLIAM, Medication in Moderation: A Case for Adopting Canada’s Limitations on Poison Pills in the U.S. and U.K., Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2016, Vol. 36, pp. 547–586 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
CHARNY, DAVID, Competition Among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules: An American Perspective on the ‘Race to the Bottom’ in the European Communities, Harvard International Law Journal, 1991, Vol. 32, pp. 423–456 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
CHEN, LI-JUIAN, The Defensive Measures in Case of Takeover under German Takeover Act and Delaware Corporate Law, National Taiwan University Law Review, 2007, Vol. 2, pp. 93–114 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
CIOFFI, JOHN, Restructuring ‘Germany Inc.’: The Politics of Company and Takeover IV Law Reform in Germany and the European Union, LAW & POLICY, 2002, Vol. 24, pp. 355–374 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
CLARKE, BLANAID, Articles 9 and 11 of the Takeover Directive (2004/25) and the Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Business Law (JBL), 2006, pp. 355–374 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
COLE, MATTHEW, Behavioural Economics and the Non-Frustration Rule: Accounting for Bias (2019) 12 Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and the Law pp. 35–62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
DAVIES, PAUL; WORTHINGTON, SARAH, Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law, 10th ed., London, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
DE LUCA, NICOLA, Primary Establishment in ECJ Case Law, European Company Law – Text, Cases and Materials, 1st ed., New York, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
EDWARDS, VANESSA, The Directive on Takeover Bids – Not Worth the Paper It’s Written On?, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR), Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 416–439 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
ENRIQUES, LUCA, EC Company Law and the Fears of a European Delaware, European Business Law Review (EBLR), 2004, Vol. 15, pp. 1259 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
ENRIQUES, LUCA, European Takeover Law: The Case for a Neutral Approach, European Business Law Review (EBLR), 2011, Vol. 22, pp. 623–639 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
ENRIQUES, LUCA, A Harmonized European Company Law: Are We There Already?, International & Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ), 2017, Vol. 66, pp. 763–777 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
FERRARINI, GUIDO; MILLER, GEOFFREY, A Simple Theory of Takeover Regulation in the United States and Europe, Cornell International Law Journal, 2009, Vol. 42, pp. 301–334 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
FERRUZZI, LORENZO, Defence Strategies against Hostile Takeover: Legitimacy of the Pre-Bid and Post-Bid Defences, International Company and Commercial Law Review (ICCLR), 2019, Vol. 30, Issue 5, pp. 272–294 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
FORNASARI, FEDERICO, Rule 2.6(d) of the UK Takeover Code: Enhancing Auctions First – an Underlying Theme of the UK Takeover Code?, The Company Lawyer, 2017, Vol. 38, Issue 3, pp. 84–89 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
GELTER, MARTIN, EU Company Law Harmonization between Convergence and Varieties of Capitalism, ECGI Law Working Paper, 2017, Vol. 355, pp. 1–33 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
HABERSACK, MATHIAS, Non-Frustration Rule and Mandatory Bid Rule – Cornerstones of European Takeover Law?, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR), 2018, Issue 1, pp. 1–40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
HAMERMESH, LAWRENCE, The Policy Foundations of Delaware Corporate Law, Columbia Law Review, 2006, Vol. 106, pp. 1749–1792 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
HERTIG, GERARD; MCCAHERY JOSEPH, Optional Rather than Mandatory EU Company Law: Framework and Specific Proposals, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR), 2006, Issue 4, pp. 341–362 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
HOPT, KLAUS, European Takeover Reform of 2012/2013 – Time to Re- Examine the Mandatory Bid, European Business Organization Law Review, 2014, Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 143–190 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
JOHNSTON, ANDREW, Takeover Regulation: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives on the City Code, The Cambridge Law Journal, 2007, Vol. 66, Issue 2, pp. 422–460 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
KERSHAW, DAVID, The Illusion of Importance: Reconsidering the UK’s Takeover Defence Prohibition, International & Comparative Law Quarterly (ICLQ), 2007, Vol. 56, Issue 2, pp. 267–307 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
KERSHAW, DAVID, Principles of Takeover Regulation, Oxford, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
KIRCHNER, CHRISTIAN; PAINTER RICHARD, Takeover Defenses under Delaware Law, the Proposed Thirteenth EU Directive and the New German Takeover Law, American Journal of Comparative Law, 2002, Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 451–476 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
KNUDSEN, JETTE STEEN, Is the Single European Market an Illusion? Obstacles to Reform of EU Takeover Regulation, European Law Journal, 2005, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 507–524 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
LAZONICK, WILLIAM; O’SULLIVAN, MARY, Maximizing Shareholder Value: A New Ideology for Corporate Governance, Economy and Society, 2000, Vol. 29, pp. 13 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
LEE, JOSEPH, Striking a Fair Balance in UK Takeover Law: Market Interests, Power of Regulation, and Enforcement’, European Business Law Review (EBLR), 2017, Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 829–846 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
MUCCIARELLI, FEDERICO, White Knights and Black Knights – Does the Search for Competitive Bids Always Benefit the Shareholders of “Target” Companies?, European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR), 2006, Issue 4, pp. 408–425 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
MUKWIRI, JONATHAN, Free Movement of Capital and Takeovers: A Case-Study of the Tension between Primary and Secondary EU Legislation, European Law Review, 2013, Vol. 38, Issue 6, pp. 829–847 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
MUKWIRI, JONATHAN, Reforming EU Takeover Law Remains on Hold, European Company Law, 2015, Vol. 12, Issue 4, pp. 186–187 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
MUKWIRI, JONATHAN, Directors’ Duties in Takeover Bids and English Company Law, International Company and Commercial Law Review (ICCLR), 2018, Vol. 19, Issue 9, pp. 281–289 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
MUKWIRI, JONATHAN, The End of History for the Board Neutrality Rule in the EU, European Business Organization Law Review, 2020, Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 253–277 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
NYOMBI, CHRISPAS, The USA as a Good Comparator for UK in Corporate Governance, International Journal of Law and Management, 2018, Vol. 60, Issue 1, pp. 135–149 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
NYOMBI, CHRISPAS; MORTIMER, TOM; RHIDIAN, LEWIS; ZOURIDAKIS, GEORGIOS, Shareholder Primacy and Stakeholders’ Interests in the Aftermath of a Takeover: A Review of Empirical Evidence, International Business Law Journal (IBLJ), 2015, Issue 2, pp. 161–186 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
OESTERLE, DALE ARTHUR, Delaware’s Takeover Statute: Of Chills, Pills, Standstills, and Who Gets Iced, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 1988, Vol. 13, pp. 879–952 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
OGOWEWO, TUNDE, Tactical Litigation in Takeover Contests, Journal of Business Law, 2007, pp. 589–619 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
OKOTUME, JENNIFER, The Growing Need to Reform the Board Neutrality Rule under UK Takeover Law, International Company and Commercial Law Review (ICCLR), 2018, Vol. 29, Issue 4, pp. 301–315 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
PAPADOPOULOS, THOMAS, The European Union Directive on Takeover Bids: Directive VII 2004/25/EC, International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal, 2008, Vol. 6, pp. 13–103 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
PAYNE, JENNIFER, Minority Shareholder Protection in Takeovers: A UK Perspective, European Company and Financial Law Review, 2011, Vol. 2, pp. 145–173 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
ROBINSON, W STEWART, A Change in the Legal Wind – How a New Direction for Corporate Governance Could Affect Takeover Regulation, International Company and Commercial Law Review, 2012, Vol. 23, pp. 292–307. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
ROMANO, ROBERTA, The State Competition Debate in Corporate Law, Cardozo Law Review, 1987, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 709–758 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
SCHUSTER, EDMUND-PHILIPP, The Mandatory Bid Rule: Efficient, After All?, The Modern Law Review (MLR), 2013, Vol. 76, pp. 529–563 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
SHAPIRO, STEPHEN; SHAPIRO DOROTHY, Time to Amend the Delaware Takeover Law, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 2014, Vol. 39, pp. 77–84 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
SKOG, ROLF, The Takeover Directive – an Endless Saga?, European Business Law Review (EBLR), 2002, Vol. 13, Issue 4, pp. 301–312 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
TSAGAS, GEORGINA, The Revision of the EU Takeover Directive in Light of the 2011 UK Takeover Law Reform: Regulation and Supervision of Takeovers in an EU in Crisis, University of Oslo Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2012, Vol. 21, pp. 21–49 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
WESSELS, WOLFGANG, Rationalizing Maastricht: The Search for an Optimal Strategy of the New Europe, International Affairs, 1994, Vol. 70, Issue 3 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
ZWECKER, ANDREW, The EU Takeover Directive: Eight Years Later, Implementation But Still No Harmonization Among Member States on Acceptable Takeover Defenses, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law, 2012, Vol. 21, pp. 233–259 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-305
AERTS, ROB J., The European Commission’s notice on directive 98/44 and the European Patent Organization’s response: the unpredictable interaction of EU and EPC law, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2018, Vol. 13(10), pp. 800–805 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
ARAKI, MOTOKO, ISHII, TETSUYA, International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization, Reproductive biology and endocrinology, 2014, Vol. 12(1), pp. 108–120 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
BAYLIS, FRANÇOISE, Altered inheritance: CRISPR and the ethics of human genome editing, Cambridge, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
BAYLIS, FRANÇOISE, Human genome editing: Our future belongs to all of Us, Issues in Science and Technology, 2019, Vol. 35(3), pp. 42–44 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
BAYLIS, FRANÇOISE; IKEMOTO, LISA, The Council of Europe and the prohibition on human germline genome editing, EMBO Reports, 2017, Vol. 18(12), pp. 2084 f. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
BELOVA, GABRIELA, Some Remarks on the Legal Status of Human Embryo, Kutafin University Law Review, 2019, Vol. 6(1), pp. 2–12 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
BONAWITZ, NICHOLAS D, et al., Zinc finger nuclease-mediated targeting of multiple transgenes to an endogenous soybean genomic locus via non-homologous end joining, Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Vol. 17(4), pp. 750–761 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
CHNEIWEISS, HIRSCH, et al, Fostering responsible research with genome editing technologies: a European perspective, Transgenic Research, 2017, Vol. 26(5), pp. 709–713 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
CHOI, PETER S; MEYERSON, MATTHEW, Targeted genomic rearrangements using CRISPR/Cas technology, Nature Communications, 2014, Vol. 5(1), pp. 1–6 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DE LECUONA, ITZIAR, et al., Focus: genome editing: gene editing in humans: towards a global and inclusive debate for responsible research, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 2017, Vol. 90(4), pp. 673–681 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DE MIGUEL BERIAIN, IÑIGO, Legal issues regarding gene editing at the beginning of life: an EU perspective, Regenerative Medicine, 2017, Vol. 12(6), pp. 669–679. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DE MIGUEL BERIAIN, IÑIGO, Should human germ line editing be allowed? Some suggestions on the basis of the existing regulatory framework, Bioethics, 2019, Vol. 33(1), pp. 105–111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DI STASI, ANGELA, Human Dignity as a Normative Concept. “Dialogue” Between European Courts (ECtHR and CJEU)?, in: Pinto de Albuquerque, Paulo; Wojtyczek, Krzysztof (eds.) Judicial Power in a Globalized World Liber Amicorum Vincent De Gaetano, Switzerland, 2019, pp. 115–130 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DICKENSON, DONNA; DARNOVSKY, MARCY, Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the ‘CRISPR babies’ experiment, Nature Biotechnology, 2019, Vol. 37(4), pp. 355–357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DOUDNA, JENNIFER A; CHARPENTIER, EMMANUELLE, The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9, Science, 2014, Vol. 346, No. 6213, pp. 1077–1086 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
DUCKWORTH, DONNA H; GULIG, PAUL A, Bacteriophages, BioDrugs, 2002, Vol. 16(1), pp. 57–62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
FOGLEMAN, SARAH, et al, CRISPR/Cas9 and mitochondrial gene replacement therapy: promising techniques and ethical considerations, American Journal of Stem Cells, 2016, Vol. 5(2), pp. 39–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
FOSTER, CHARLES, Human dignity in bioethics and law, Bloomsbury, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
FRISCHHUT, MARKUS; WERNER-FELMAYER, GABRIELE, A European perspective on medical ethics, Medicine, 2020, Vol. 48(10), pp. 634–636 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
FUKUYAMA, FRANCIS, Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution, New York, 2003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
GUNNING, JENNIFER, Article 18 of the European Biomedicine Convention: What Impact on Assisted Reproduction, European Journal of Health Law, 1999, 6, pp. 165–171 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, The future of human nature, Cambridge, 2003 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
HARRISON, PATRICK T; HART, STEPHEN, A beginner's guide to gene editing, Experimental Physiology, 2018, Vol. 103(4), pp. 439–448 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
HESELHAUS, SEBASTIAN, Human Dignity in the EU, in: Becchi, Paolo; Mathis, Klaus (eds.), Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe, New York, 2019, pp. 943–967 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
HYUN, INSOO, et al., Toward guidelines for research on human embryo models formed from stem cells, Stem Cell Reports, 2020, Vol. 14(2), pp. 169–174 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
KIM, YANG-GYUN, et al, Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996, Vol. 93(3), pp. 1156–1160 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
KOMAROVA, TETYANA V, The Patentability of Biotechnological Inventions in the Eu: an Impact on Therapeutic Practice, Wiadomosci Lekarskie, 2020, Vol. 73(8), pp. 1747–1751 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
LANDER, ERIC, et al., Adopt a moratorium on heritable genome editing, Nature, 2019, Vol. 567, pp. 165–168 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
LE RHUN, ANAÏS, et al., CRISPR-Cas in Streptococcus pyogenes, RNA Biology, 2019, Vol. 16(4), pp. 380–389. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
LEDFORD, HEIDI, CRISPR gene editing in human embryos wreaks chromosomal mayhem, Nature, 2020, Vol. 583, No. 7814, pp. 17 f. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
LI, JINHUAN, et al, Efficient inversions and duplications of mammalian regulatory DNA elements and gene clusters by CRISPR/Cas9, Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, 2015, Vol. 7(4), pp. 284–298. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
LWOFF, LAURENCE, Council of Europe adopts protocol on genetic testing for health purposes, European Journal of Human Genetics, 2009, Vol. 17(11), pp. 1374–1377 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
LWOFF, LAURENCE, New Technologies, New Challenges for Human Rights? The Work of the Council of Europe, European Journal of Health Law, 2020, Vol. 27(3), pp. 335–344 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
MARAZUELA, RAFAEL; GARRIDO, GREGORIO; MATESANZ, ROSARIO, European union and Spanish regulations on quality and safety of tissues and cells: Overview and biovigilance, Transplantation Proceedings, 2009, Vol. 41(6), pp. 2044–2026 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
MILLER, JEFFREY C, et al., A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing, Nature Biotechnology, 2011, Vol. 29(2), pp. 143–148 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE, Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance, Washington, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
NOVAK, STEPHEN, Plant Biotechnology Applications of Zinc Finger Technology, in: Kumar, Sandeep; Barone, Pierluigi; Smith, Michelle (eds.) Transgenic Plants. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1864, New York, 2019, pp. 295–310 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
PENNISI, ELIZABETH, The CRISPR craze, Science, 2013, Vol. 341, pp. 833–836 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
POLI, LUDOVICA, Regulation of Human Germline Genome Modification in Italy, in: Boggio, Andrea; Romano, Cesare; Almqvist, Jessica (eds.), Human Germline Genome Modification and the Right to Science: A Comparative Study of National Laws and Policies, Cambridge, 2020, pp. 335–357 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
RAPOSO, VERA LUCIA, The First Chinese Edited Babies: A Leap of Faith in Science, JBRA Assisted Reproduction, 2019, Vol. 23(3), pp. 197–199 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
RATH, JOHANNES, Safety and security risks of CRISPR/Cas9, in: Schroeder, Doris, et al (eds.), Ethics Dumping, New York, 2018, pp. 107–113 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
REIS, ELIZABETH, Did Bioethics Matter? A History of Autonomy, Consent, and Intersex Genital Surgery, Medical Law Review, 2019, Vol. 27(4), pp. 658–674 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
SANDOR, JUDIT, Editing human reproduction? Legal and ethical aspects, in Sills, Scott; Palermo, Gianpiero (eds.), Human Embryos and Preimplantation Genetic Technologies, Ethical, Social, and Public Policy Aspects, Cambridge, 2019, pp. 185–197 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
SEGERS; SEPPE; MERTES, HEIDI, Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity?, Bioethics, 2020, Vol. 34(1), pp. 33–40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
SMOLENSKI, JOANNA, CRISPR/Cas9 and germline modification: New difficulties in obtaining informed consent, The American Journal of Bioethics, 2015, Vol. 15(12), pp. 35–37 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
STARCK, CHRISTIAN, Freedom of Scientific Research and Its Restrictions in German Constitutional Law, Israel Law Review, 2006, Vol. 39, pp. 110–126 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
STURGES, MELISSA L, Who Should Hold Property Rights to the Human Rights Genome – An Application of the Common Heritage of Humankind, American University International Law Review, 1997, Vol. 13, pp. 219–261 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
SYKORA, PETER; CAPLAN, ARTHUR, Germline gene therapy is compatible with human dignity, EMBO Reports, 2017, Vol. 18(12), p. 2086 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
SYKORA, PETER; CAPLAN, ARTHUR, The Council of Europe should not reaffirm the ban on germline genome editing in humans, EMBO Reports, 2017, Vol. 18(11), pp. 1871 f. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
TORRES, RAUL, et al, Engineering human tumour-associated chromosomal translocations with the RNA-guided CRISPR–Cas9 system, Nature Communication, 2014, Vol. 5(1), pp. 1–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
VIVILLE, STEPHANE; NISAND, ISRAËL, Legal aspects of human embryo research and preimplantation genetic diagnosis in France, Human Reproduction, 1997, Vol. 12(11), pp. 2341–2342 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
VOGEL, GRETCHEN, Embryo engineering alarm, Bioethics, 2015, Vol. 347, No. 6228, p. 1301 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
WALIN, LAURA, Ambiguity of the embryo protection in the human rights and biomedicine convention: Experiences from the Nordic countries, European Journal of Health Law, 2007, Vol. 14(2), pp. 131–148 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
WANG, YAO, et al., Specificity profiling of CRISPR system reveals greatly enhanced off-target gene editing, Scientific Reports, 2020, Vol. 10(1), pp. 1–8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-341
BERCUSSON, BRIAN, European Labour Law, 2. Auflage, Cambridge, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
EICHENHOFER, EBERHARD, Beamtenversorgung und Arbeitnehmer-freizügigkeit, ZBR, 2019, S. 237–243 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
FRANZEN, MARTIN; GALLNER, INKEN; OETKER, HARTMUT, Kommentar zum europäischen Arbeitsrecht, 3. Auflage, München, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
HANTEL, PETER, Die Bereichsausnahme nach Art. 45 Abs. 4 AEUV in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2018, S. 61–67 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
MÜLLER-GLÖGE, RUDI; PREIS, ULRICH; SCHMIDT, INGRID, Er-furter Kommentar zum Arbeitsrecht, 20. Auflage, 2020, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
REINECKE, GERHARD, Mitnahme von Versorgungsansprüchen nach vorzeitigem Ausscheiden aus dem Beamtenverhältnis, Arbeit und Recht, 2016, Jahrgang 64, Nr. 10, S. 396–398 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
RULAND, FRANZ, Das Ende der herkömmlichen Nachversicherung von Beamten – Die Folgen der Entscheidung des EuGH vom 13.7.2016, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, 2017, 36. Jahrgang, Heft 7, S. 422–427 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
STREINZ, RUDOLF, Europarecht, 11. Auflage, 2019, München Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367
THOMASBERGER, MARTINA, Der Überweisungsbetrag als Freizügigkeitshin-dernis, DRdA 2017, Heft 370, S. 196 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-2-367