Zeitschrift für Flüchtlingsforschung, The German Journal for Refugee Studies (Z’Flucht) is a new peer-reviewed journal which publishes academic works from diverse disciplines on questions related to forced migration and refugee studies. The journal is published twice a year by Nomos publishing house in association with the German Refugee Research Network (Netzwerk Flüchtlingsforschung) and is edited by Marcel Berlinghoff, J. Olaf Kleist, Ulrike Krause and Jochen Oltmer. Z’Flucht provides a forum for exchange in the field of forced migration and refugee studies through empirical studies, theoretical reflections and methodological discussions. By means of international, regional or national studies, scholar may tackle questions related to the conditions, forms and consequences of forced migration and displacement, protection of refugees and efforts towards durable solutions, such as (re)integration or resettlement. Moreover, refugees’ activities and strategies utilized to contend with their experiences may be analysed. The journal includes all categories of people who have been forcibly displaced or who have fled from their homes due to violence and examines related debates, discourses, practices and concepts. As such topics can be explored from diverse perspectives, the journal places special emphasis on interdisciplinary discussions and comprises various disciplines, including law, sociology, history, politics, philosophy, ethnology, psychology, geography and economics, linguistics and literary studies. As displacement and forced migration not only represent a growing field of research but also a broad political and practical area, this journal aims to promote the exchange between academia and practice. Z’Flucht publishes works in three categories: academic articles, forum articles and literature reviews. Academic articles present research findings on specific questions related to forced migration and refugees which are methodically and theoretically reflected, and consider and further the current state of research in this field. These articles undergo a double-blind peer review and are limited to 80,000 characters (including spaces). Forum articles can include shorter (field) research reports, address theoretical, methodological, conceptual and ethical questions of research or relate to current discussions in forced migration and refugee studies. Manuscripts from practitioners are welcome. The editors of the journal review all forum articles, which are limited to 35,000 characters (including spaces). Literature reviews can relate to individual or a number of new publications from the last two years which discuss aspects of forced migration and refugee studies. In view of the journal’s interdisciplinary focus, publications which cover several fields are preferred. Individual reviews are limited to 6,000 characters (including spaces), while multiple books reviews should be no longer than 20,000 characters (including spaces). The journal predominantly publishes works written in German, but studies written in English and French may be considered.
The international order is based on the fundamental belief that nation-states can control access to their territories. Asylum law puts this logic into perspective by guaranteeing fair procedures to those seeking protection and, if accepted, basic...
Through an extensive interpretation of the collective expulsion prohibition, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has for decades compensated for the lack of procedural rights in the European Convention on Human Rights in the expulsion and...
The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) can affect the European Union’s (EU) policymaking processes in the area of asylum policy. At the same time, ECtHR judgements are shaped by contextual factors, which may raise or hamper a...
While socio-legal literature widely discusses the role of emotions in courts, refugee studies have yet to embrace a perspective that goes beyond viewing emotions as dichotomous to reason and objectivity. This paper fills this gap by using a...
The implementation practices of ‹who is a refugee› vary widely in their approaches and outcomes. Scholarship in legal anthropology, sociolegal studies and comparative political science aims to understand and to explain the different (and often...
In the field of refugee law, ‹discretion› reasoning – that is, the assumption that asylum seekers can be returned to their countries of origin on the basis that they can avoid persecution by behaving ‹discreetly› and thus escaping the...
Looking at the special constellation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), this article asks how Glaubhaftigkeit (credibility in relation to an account) and Glaubwürdigkeit (credibility in relation to a person) are established and negotiated in...
This article questions the imagined neutrality of Country of Origin Reports from the perspective of queer forced migration. On the basis of queerfeminist and postcolonial theories, it takes steps towards deconstructing this objectivity. To this end,...
Based on the global (Refugee) Law Clinic movement, this article reflects on the origin, impact, opportunities, and challenges of Clinical Legal Education in migration law in Germany. It examines to what extent Refugee Law Clinics not only strengthen...