Cover of book: Exploring the Uncharted Waters of European Competition Law 4.0
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Exploring the Uncharted Waters of European Competition Law 4.0

An approach to the regulation of abusive data-related behaviors of dominant undertakings in the digital age
Authors:
Publisher:
 2021

Summary

Today, Facebook and co. control more and more aspects of everyday life and the economy. Their data-driven business models pose new challenges, especially for competition law. Against this background, the book examines the interplay of competition and data protection law in a European context and aims to show whether the chronic data protection violations by the big players of the digital economy can also be dealt with under European competition law. The main focus of the work is to examine if and how data protection principles can be taken into account when applying Art. 102 TFEU and what alternative solutions to the competition law regulation of Facebook and co. exist.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2021
Copyright Year
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-7741-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2137-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Europäische Rechtspolitik der Universität Bremen (ZERP)
Volume
81
Language
English
Pages
178
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
    1. I. Background No access
    2. II. Focus of the thesis No access
    3. III. Structure and methodology No access
    1. I. Big data and its importance for the digital economy No access
      1. 1. The term “online platform” No access
      2. 2. Characteristics of the digital platform economy No access
      1. 1. Classification of contract typology No access
      2. 2. Data as subject of performance No access
      3. 3. Interim conclusion No access
      1. 1. The establishment of dominance and the resulting “special responsibility” No access
      2. 2. The abuse of a dominant position No access
      3. 3. The possibility of an objective justification for abusive conduct No access
        1. a) The material scope No access
        2. b) The territorial scope No access
        3. c) The personal scope No access
        1. a) The admissible grounds for processing personal data No access
        2. b) The principles of purpose limitation and data minimization No access
        3. c) The requirement of transparency No access
    1. I. The evolving opinion on the relation between data protection and competition law No access
        1. a) The objectives of European competition law No access
        2. b) The objectives of the GDPR and data protection law in general No access
      2. 2. Other links between data protection and competition law No access
    3. III. Interim conclusion No access
    1. I. The investigation and decision by the German Bundeskartellamt No access
    2. II. The court order of the Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf No access
    3. III. The decision of the German Federal Court of Justice No access
        1. a) The extent of data collection and the level of data protection as a criterion for market power No access
        2. b) Access to (big) data as a barrier to expansion No access
        3. c) Interim conclusion No access
          1. aa) The essential facilities doctrine in a data-related context No access
          2. bb) The General Data Protection Regulation as an indicator for infringements of the undertaking`s “special responsibility” No access
          1. aa) The influence of data protection considerations on the notion of abuse under Art. 102 (1) TFEU No access
          2. bb) Excessive collection of data as a form of excessive pricing No access
          3. cc) Unfair contractual terms and conditions in the light of the General Data Protection Regulation No access
        3. c) Interim conclusion No access
      1. 1. Arguments in favour of the approach No access
      2. 2. Arguments against the approach No access
      3. 3. Interim conclusion No access
    1. I. Formal competence to sanction data-related behaviours via completion law No access
    2. II. Lacking expertise with regard to data protection law No access
    3. III. Interim conclusion No access
    1. I. Background of the idea No access
    2. II. Legal appraisal of the idea No access
      1. 1. The term “natural monopoly” No access
      2. 2. The classification of Facebook as a natural monopoly No access
    2. II. The problems resulting from natural monopolies in the digital (platform) economy No access
      1. 1. Interoperability No access
      2. 2. Merger regulation No access
      3. 3. Transparency No access
      4. 4. Adjustment of the burden of proof No access
    4. IV. Interim conclusion No access
  11. J. Final conclusion and future prospects No access 153 - 158
    1. Table of Cases No access
    2. Other official sources No access

Bibliography (208)

  1. Alpmann, Josef A./Krüger, Rolf/Wüstenbecker, Horst, Alpmann Brockhaus Studienlexikon Recht, 4th edition, Munich 2014. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  2. Andriychuk, Oles, The Normative Foundations of European Competition Law – Assessing the Goals of Antitrust through the Lens of Legal Philosophy, Cheltenham 2017. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  3. Arnull, Anthony/Chalmers, Damian, The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, Oxford 2015 (cited: author, in: Arnull/Chalmers). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  4. Bamberger, Heinz Georg/Roth, Herbert/Hau, Wolfgang/Poseck, Roman, Beck’scher Onlinekommentar BGB, 50th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: BeckOK BGB). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  5. Baumbach, Adolf/Hueck, Alfred, Beck‘sche Kurzkommentare – Gesetz betreffend die Gesellschaften mit beschränkter Haftung, 21st edition, Munich 2017 (cited: author, in: Baumbach/Hueck). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  6. Bechtold, Rainer/Bosch, Wolfgang, Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen Kommentar, 9th edition, Munich 2018, (cited: author, in: Bechtold/Bosch, GWB Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  7. Becker, Carsten, “Bundeskartellamt und Verbraucherschutz“, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht (ZWeR) 2018, 229–245. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  8. Bellamy, Christopher/Child, Graham D., European Union Law of Competition, 7th edition, Oxford 2013. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  9. Berg, Werner/Mäsch, Gerald, Deutsches und Europäisches Kartellrecht Kommentar, 3rd edition, Cologne 2018 (cited: author, in: Berg/Mäsch, KartellR Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  10. Bornkamm, Joachim/Montag, Frank/Säcker, Franz Jürgen, Münchener Kommentar Europäisches und Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht, Volume 1, 2nd edition, Munich 2015 (cited: author, in: MüKoEuWettbR). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  11. Bräutigam, Peter, Das Nutzungsverhältnis bei sozialen Netzwerken. Zivilrechtlicher Austausch von IT-Leistung gegen personenbezogene Daten, Multimedia und Recht (MMR) 2012, 635–641. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  12. Brink, Stefan/Wolff, Heinrich Amadeus, Beck‘scher Onlinekommentar Datenschutzrecht, 28th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: BeckOK DatenschutzR). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  13. Bruc, Édouard, “Data as an essential facility in European law: how to define the “target” market and divert the data pipeline?”, European Competition Journal 2019, 177–224. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  14. Buchner, Benedikt, “Datenschutz und Kartellrecht“, Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis (WRP) 2019, 1243–1248. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  15. Bunte, Hermann-Josef, Kartellrecht Kommentar, Volume 2, Europäisches Kartellrecht, 13th edition, Cologne 2018 (cited: author, in: Langen/Bunte, EU KartellR Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  16. Buttarelli, Giovanni, The EU GDPR as a clarion call for a new global digital gold standard, International Data Privacy Law 2016, 77–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  17. Callies, Christian/Ruffert, Matthias, EUV/AEUV Kommentar – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 5th edition, Munich 2016 (cited: author, in: Callies/Ruffert). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  18. Cornelius, Kai, “Die „datenschutzrechtliche Einheit“ als Grundlage des bußgeldrechtlichen Unternehmensbegriff nach der EU-DSGVO“, Neue Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-, Steuer- und Unternehmensstrafrecht (NZWiST) 2016, 421–426. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  19. Costa-Cabral, Francisco/Lynskey, Orla, “Family Ties: The Intersection Between Data Protection and Competition in EU Law”, Common Market Law Review (CML Rev.) 2017, 11–50. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  20. Cseres, Kati J., “The Controversies of the Consumer Welfare Standard”, Competition Law Review 2007, 121–173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  21. Daskalova, Victoria, “Consumer Welfare in EU Competition Law: What Is It (Not) About?“, Competition Law Review 2017, 133–162. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  22. Dewenter, Ralf/Rösch, Jürgen/Terschüren, Anna, “Abgrenzung zweiseitiger Märkte am Beispiel von Internetsuchmaschinen“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2014, 387–394. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  23. Dowse, Melissa/Dück, Hermann, “Zwangseinwilligung zur Datenverarbeitung – zugleich Anmerkung zum Beschluss des OLG Düsseldorf in Sachen Facebook I“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2020, 80–83. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  24. Dreier, Thomas/Schulze, Gernot, Urheberrechtsgesetz Kommentar, 6th edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: Dreier/Schulze). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  25. Ducci, Francesco, Natural Monopolies in Digital Platform Markets, Cambridge 2020. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  26. Dück, Hermann/Maschemer, Andreas, Zwischen „Rule of reason“ und Immanenztheorie – Zur dogmatischen Einordnung der Markenabgrenzungsvereinbarung, Wettbewerb in Recht und Praxis (WRP) 2013, 167–172. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  27. Eberl, Christina, “Verstaatlichung international verflochtener Unternehmen“, in: Aderhold, Eltje/Lipstein, Kurt/Schücking, Christoph/Stürner, Rolf, Festschrift für Hans Hanisch, Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Munich 1994, pp. 39–57 (cited: Eberl, in: Aderhold et al.) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  28. Ehmann, Eugen/ Selmayr, Martin, Beck‘sche Kurzkommentare Datenschutzgrundverordnung, 2nd edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: Ehmann/Selmayr, DSGVO Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  29. Ellger, Reinhard, “Konditionenmissbrauch nach § 19 GWB durch Datenschutzverstoß – der Facebook-Fall des Bundeskartellamts“, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WUW) 2019, 446–454. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  30. Ellger, Reinhard, “Facebook und das Kartellrecht – ein Drama in drei Akten“, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WUW) 2019, 493–493. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  31. Eßer, Martin/Kramer, Philipp/von Lewinski, Kai, DSGVO BDSG Kommentar, 6th edition, Cologne 2018 (cited: author, in: Eßer/Kramer/von Lewinski, DSGVO/BDSG Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  32. Fleischer, Holger/Goette, Wulf, Münchener Kommentar zum GmbHG, Volume 1, §§ 1–34, 3rd edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: MüKo GmbHG). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  33. Forkel, Hans, “Lizenzen an Persönlichkeitsrechten durch gebundene Rechtsübertragung“, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 1988, 491–501. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  34. Franceschi, Alberto (de), “Digitale Inhalte gegen personenbezogene Daten: Unentgeltlichkeit oder Gegenleistung?“, in: Schmidt-Kessel, Martin/Kramme, Malte, Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Wirtschaft, Jena 2017, pp. 115–138. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  35. Franck, Jens-Uwe, “Eine Frage des Zusammenhangs: Marktbeherrschungsmissbrauch durch rechtswidrige Konditionen – Facebook im Visier des Bundeskartellamts“, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht (ZWeR) 2016, 137–164. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  36. Frenz, Walter, Handbuch Europarecht, Volume 5 – Wirkung und Rechtsschutz, Heidelberg 2010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  37. Gerber, David J., “The European Competition Law Story: Some German Roles”, in: Großfeld, Bernhard/Sack, Rolf/Möllers, Thomas M.J./Drexl, Josef/Heinemann, Andreas, Festschrift für Wolfgang Fikentscher, Tübingen 1998, pp 654–670. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  38. Gersdorf, Hubertus/Paal, Boris P., Beck'scher Onlinekommentar Informations- und Medienrecht, 24th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: BeckOK InfoMedienR). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  39. Gola, Peter, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung Kommentar, 2nd edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: Gola, DSGVO Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  40. Grabitz, Eberhard/Hilf, Meinhard/Nettesheim, Martin, Das Recht der Europäischen Union, Volume II EUV/AEUV, 65th supplement delivery, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: Grabitz/Hilf/Nettesheim). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  41. Grabitz, Eberhard/Hilf, Meinhard/Nettesheim, Martin, Das Recht der Europäischen Union, Volume I, EUV/AEUV, 67th supplementary delivery, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: Grabitz/Hilf/Nettesheim, Das Recht der Europäischen Union). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  42. Grave, Carsten/Nyberg, Jenny, “Die Rolle von Big Data bei der Anwendung des Kartellrechts“, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WuW) 2017, 363–368. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  43. Groeben, von der, Hans/Schwarze, Jürgen/Hatje, Armin, Europäisches Unionsrecht, 7th edition, Baden-Baden 2015 (cited: author, in: von der Groeben/Schwarze/Hatje). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  44. Hacker, Philipp, “Daten als Gegenleistung: Rechtsgeschäfte im Spannungsfeld von DS-GVO und allgemeinem Vertragsrecht“, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Privatrechtswissenschaft (ZfPW) 2019, 148–197. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  45. Henssler, Martin, Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Volume 5/1, Schuldrecht – Besonderer Teil III/1, 7th edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: MüKo BGB V). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  46. Henssler, Martin/Krüger, Wolfgang, Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Volume 4, Schuldrecht – Besonderer Teil II, 7th edition, Munich 2016 (cited: author, in: MüKo BGB IV). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  47. Höppner, Thomas, “Plattform-Regulierung light“, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WUW) 2020, 71–79. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  48. Hoeren, Thomas/Sieber, Ulrich/Holznagel, Bernd, Handbuch Multimedia-Recht, 48th supplemantary edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: Hoeren/Sieber/Holznagel, Handbuch MMR). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  49. Hoffer, Raoul/Lehr, Leo Alexander, “ Onlineplattformen und Big Data auf dem Prüfstand – Gemeinsame Betrachtung der Fälle Amazon, Google und Facebook“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2019, 10–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  50. Hussain, Fatima, Internet of Things: Building Blocks and Business Models, Cham 2017. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  51. Immenga, Ulrich/Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim, Wettbewerbsrecht – Kommentar zum Europäischen Kartellrecht, Volume 1, EU/Part 1, 6th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: Immenga/Mestmäcker, KartellR Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  52. Immenga, Ulrich/Mestmäcker, Ernst-Joachim, Wettbewerbsrecht – Kommentar zum Deutschen Kartellrecht, Volume 2, 5th edition, Munich 2014 (cited: author, in: Immenga/Mestmäcker, WettbewerbsR Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  53. Jandt, Silke/Roßnagel, Alexander, “ Social Networks für Kinder und Jugendliche – Besteht ein ausreichender Datenschutz?“, MultiMedia und Recht (MMR) 2011, 637–642. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  54. Jarass, Hans D., Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union Kommentar, 3rd edition, Munich 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  55. Jones, Alison/Brenda, Sufrin, EU Competition Law – Text, Cases, and Materials, 6th edition, Oxford 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  56. Kadar, Massimiliano, “European Union competition law in the digital era”, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht (ZWeR) 2015, 342–362. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  57. Kamann, Hans-Georg/Miller, Robin Dominik, Kartellrecht und Datenschutzrecht – Verhältnis einer “Hass-Liebe”?, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2016, 405–412. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  58. Kilian, Wolfgang, “Informationelle Selbstbestimmung und Marktprozesse – Zur Notwendigkeit der Modernisierung des Modernisierungsgutachtens zum Datenschutz“, Computer und Recht (CR) 2002, 921–929. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  59. Körber, Torsten, “Analoges Kartellrecht für digitale Märkte?”, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WuW) 2015, 120–133. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  60. Körber, Torsten, “Die Facebook-Entscheidung des Bundeskartellamtes – Machtmissbrauch durch Verletzung des Datenschutzrechts?“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2019, 187–195. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  61. Körber, Torsten, “Ist Wissen Marktmacht?“ Überlegungen zum Verhältnis von Datenschutz, „Datenmacht“ und Kartellrecht – Teil 1“, Neue Zeitschrift Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2016, 303–310. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  62. Körber, Torsten, “Konzeptionelle Erfassung digitaler Plattformen und adäquate Regulierungsstrategien“, Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht (ZUM) 2017, 93–101. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  63. Krämer, Hagen, “Digitalisierung, Monopolbildung und wirtschaftliche Ungleichheit“, Wirtschaftsdienst 2019, 47–52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  64. Kühling, Jürgen/Buchner, Benedikt, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung/BDSG Kommentar, 2nd edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: Kühling/Buchner). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  65. Kupik, Jan/ Mikeš, Stanislav, „Discussion on big data, online advertising and competition policy“, European Competition Law Review (E.C.L.R.) 2018, 393–402. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  66. Kutscher, Antonia, Der digitale Nachlass, Göttingen 2015. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  67. Langhanke, Carmen/Schmidt-Kessel, Martin, “Consumer Data as Consideration“, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law (EuCML) 2015, 218–223. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  68. Loewenheim, Ulrich/Meessen, Karl M./Riesenkampff, Alexander, Kartellrecht, Volume 2 – GWB Kommentar, Munich 2006 (cited: author, in: Loewenheim/Meessen/Riesenkampff). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  69. Loewenheim, Ulrich/Meessen, Karl M./Riesenkampff, Alexander/Kersting, Christian/Meyer-Lindeman, Hans Jürgen, Kartellrecht Kommentar, 3rd edition, Munich 2016 (cited: author, in: Loewenheim et al.). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  70. Mohr, Jochen, “Kartellrechtlicher Konditionenmissbrauch durch datenschutzwidrige Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen“, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 2019, 265–273. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  71. Müller, Christian H./Thiede, Thomas, “Kartellrechtliche Risiken durch Wettbewerbsverbote in Unternehmenskaufverträgen”, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 2017, 246–249. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  72. Mundt, Andreas, “Verbraucherschutz im Bundeskartellamt“, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WUW) 2019, 181–186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  73. Nuys, Marcel, “Big Data“ – “Die Bedeutung von Daten im Kartellrecht“, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb (WuW) 2016, 512–520. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  74. O’Donoghue, Robert/Padilla, Jorge A., The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC, Portland 2006. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  75. Paal, Boris P., “Daten und Kartellrecht“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2018, 157–158. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  76. Paal, Boris P., “Immaterialgüter, Internetmonopole und Kartellrecht“, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 2013, 873–881. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  77. Paal, Boris P./Kumkar, Lea Katharina, “Wettbewerbsschutz in der Digitalwirtschaft – Die wichtigsten Neuerungen der 10. GWB-Novelle im Überblick“, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 2021, 809–815. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  78. Paal, Boris P./Pauly, Daniel A., Beck‘sche Kompaktkommentare – Datenschutz-Grundverordnung Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, 2nd edition, Munich 2018 (cited: author, in: Paal/Pauly, DSGVO/BDSG Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  79. Palandt, Otto, Beck’sche Kurz-Kommentare Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, 78th edition, Munich 2019. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  80. Pechstein, Matthias/Nowak, Carsten/Häde, Ulrich, Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Volume 1 – EUV und GRC, Tübingen 2017 (cited: author, in: Pechstein/Nowak/Häde, Frankfurter Kommentar EUV/GRC/AEUV). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  81. Podszun, Rupprecht/de Toma, Michael, “Die Durchsetzung des Datenschutzes durch Verbraucherrechtm Lauterkeitsrecht und Kartellrecht”, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 2016, 2987–2994. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  82. Polley, Romina/Kaup, Rieke, “Paradigmenwechsel in der deutschen Missbrauchaufsicht – Der Referentenentwurf zur 10. GWB-Novelle“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2020, 113–119. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  83. Posner, Richard A., “Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation“, Stanford Law Review 1969, 548–643. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  84. Prütting, Hanns/Wegen, Gerhard/Weinreich, Gerd, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch Kommentar, 13th edition, Cologne 2018 (cited: author, in: Prütting/Wegen/Weinreich). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  85. Rothmann, Robert/Buchner, Benedikt, “Der typische Facebook-Nutzer zwischen Recht und Realität – Zugleich eine Anmerkung zu LG Berlin v. 16.01.2018“, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit (DuD) 2018, 342–346. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  86. Rücker, Daniel/Kugler, Tobias, New European General Data Protection Regulation – A Practitioner`s Guide, Baden-Baden 2018. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  87. Rudersdorf, Martin, “Wettbewerbsverbote in Gesellschafts- und Unternehmenskaufverträgen“, Rheinische Notar-Zeitschrift (RNotZ) 2011, 509–530. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  88. Säcker, Franz Jürgen/Rixecker, Roland/Oetker, Harmut/Limperg, Bettina, Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Volume 2 – §§ 241–310 BGB, 8th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: MüKo BGB II). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  89. Schmidt-Kessel, Martin/Erler, Katharina/Grimm, Anna/Kramme, Malte, “Die Richtlinienvorschläge der Kommission zu Digitalen Inhalten und Online-Handel – Teil 2”, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union (GPR) 2016, 54–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  90. Schmidt-Kessel, Martin/Grimm, Anna, “Unentgeltlich oder entgeltlich? – Der vertragliche Austausch von digitalen Inhalten gegen personenbezogene Daten“, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Privatrechtswissenschaft (ZfPW) 2017, 84–108. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  91. Schmidt, Ingo/Haucap, Justus, Wettbewerbspolitik und Kartellrecht – Eine interdisziplinäre Einführung, 9th edition, Munich 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  92. Schmoeckel, Mathias/Maetschke, Matthias, Rechtsgeschichte der Wirtschaft, 2nd edition, Tübingen 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  93. Schneider, Giulia, “Testing Art. 102 TFEU in the Digital Marketplace“, Journal of European Competition Law and Practice 2018, 213–225. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  94. Schreiber, Kristina, Facebook kombiniert Nutzerdaten missbräuchlich, da DSGVO-widrig, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Praxis im Immaterialgüter und Wettbewerbsrecht (GRUR-Prax) 2019, 266. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  95. Schulte, Josef L./Just, Christoph, Heymanns Kommentare zum gewerblichen Rechtsschutz, Kartellrecht Kommentar, 2nd edition, Cologne 2016 (cited: author, in: Schulte/Just, KartellR Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  96. Schwartmann, Rolf/Jaspers, Andreas/Thüsing, Gregor/Kugelmann, Dieter, Heidelberger Kommentar DS-GVO/BDSG, Heidelberg 2018 (cited: author, in: Schwartmann/Jaspers/Thüsing/Kugelmann, DSGVO/BDSG Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  97. Seidler, Katharina, Digitaler Nachlass – Das postmortale Schicksal elektronischer Kommunikation, Frankfurt/Main 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  98. Spelthahn, Sabine, Privatisierung natürlicher Monopole – Theorie und internationale Praxis am Beispiel Wasser und Abwasser, Wiesbaden 1994. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  99. Spiecker genannt Döhmann, Indra, “Digitale Mobilität: Plattform Governance – IT-sicherheits- und datenschutzrechtliche Implikationen“, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 2019, 341–352. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  100. Spindler, Gerald/Schuster, Fabian, Recht der elektronischen Medien, 4th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: Spindler/Schuster, Recht der elektronischen Medien). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  101. Steinrötter, Björn, Feuertaufe für die EU-Datenschutz-Grundverordnung – und das Kartellrecht steht Pate, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht (EWS) 2018, 61–71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  102. Stern, Klaus/Sachs, Michael, Europäische Grundrechte-Charta Kommentar, Munich 2016 (cited: author, in: Stern/Sachs, GRCh Kommentar). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  103. Streinz, Rudolf, Europarecht, 10th edition, Heidelberg 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  104. Stucke, Maurice E./Grunes, Allen P., Big Data and Competition Policy, Oxford 2016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  105. Tamke, Maren, “Big Data and Competition Law“, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht (ZWeR) 2017, 358–385. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  106. Unseld, Florian, “Die Übertragbarkeit von Persönlichkeitsrechten“, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 2011, 982–988. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  107. Volmar, Maximilian, “Marktabgrenzung bei mehrseitigen Online-Plattformen“, Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht (ZWeR) 2017, 386–408. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  108. von Danwitz, Thomas, Die Grundrechte auf Achtung der Privatsphäre und auf Schutz personenbezogener Daten, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit (DuD) 2015, 581–585. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  109. Weber, Klaus, Creifelds Rechtswörterbuch, 22nd edition, Munich 2017. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  110. Weichert, Thilo, “Die Ökonomisierung des Rechts auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung“, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 2001, 1463–1469. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  111. Weitbrecht, Andreas, „Kartellrecht – Gestern, heute und morgen“, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht (NZKart) 2020, 45–46. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  112. Wiedemann, Gerhard, Handbuch des Kartellrechts, 3rd edition, Munich 2016 (cited: author, in: Wiedemann, Handbuch des Kartellrechts). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  113. Zech, Herber, ““Industrie 4.0“ – Rechtsrahmen für eine Datenwirtschaft im digitalen Binnenmarkt“, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 2015, 1151–1160. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  114. Ziemons, Hildegard/Jaeger, Carsten, Beck‘scher Online-Kommentar GmbHG, 39th edition, Munich 2019 (cited: author, in: BeckOK GmbHG). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  115. Albers, Michael, “Der „more economic approach“ bei Verdrängungsmissbräuchen: Zum Stand der Überlegungen der Europäischen Kommission“, Lecture on the occasion of the Hamburg Antitrust Law Symposium 2006, available on the internet under http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/art82/albers.pdf (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  116. Almunia, Joaquín, Speech “Competition – what's in it for consumers?“ on the occasion of the European Competition and Consumer Day in Poznan, 24 November 2011, available on the internet under http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-11-803_en.htm (last accessed: 11/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  117. Almunia, Joaquín, Speech “Competition and personal data protection”, speech at the Privacy Platform event: Competition and Privacy in Markets of Data, Brussels 26 November 2012, available under http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-860_en.htm (last accessed: 09/02/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  118. Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, WP 259 – Guidelines on consent under Regulation 2016/679, available on the internet under https://iapp.org/resources/article/wp29-guidelines-on-consent/ (last accessed: 07/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  119. Art. 29 Data Protection Working Party, Working Paper 203, Opinion 03/2013 on purpose limitation, available on the Internet under https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2013/wp203_en.pdf (last accessed: 28/01/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  120. Autorité de la concurrence and the Bundeskartellamt, “Competition Law and Data”, May 10th, 2016, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Berichte/Big%20Data%20Papier.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (last accessed: 26/01/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  121. Budzinski, Oliver, “Diskussionspapier Nr. 103 – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Wettbewerbspolitik durch Marktplätze im Internet“, available on the internet under https://www.tu-ilmenau.de/fileadmin/media/wth/Diskussionspapier_Nr_103.pdf (last accessed: 20/06/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  122. Bundeskartellamt, “Big Data und Wettbewerb”, October 2017, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Schriftenreihe_Digitales/Schriftenreihe_Digitales_1.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3 (last accessed: 23/01/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  123. Bundeskartellamt, ”Background information on the Facebook proceeding“, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/EN/Diskussions_Hintergrundpapiere/2017/Hintergrundpapier_Facebook.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=6 (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  124. Bundeskartellamt, B6–113/15, “Arbeitspapier Marktmacht von Plattformen und Netzwerken“, June 2016, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Berichte/Think-Tank-Bericht.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (last accessed: 23/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  125. Bundeskartellamt, case summary of case no. B6–22/16 – Facebook, published February 15, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22-16.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3 (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  126. Bundeskartellamt, press release “Bundeskartellamt prohibits Facebook from combining user data from different sources”, February 7, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2019/07_02_2019_Facebook.html;jsessionid=832649993354525E65A66B820BEC5711.1_cid378?nn=3591568 (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  127. Bundeskartellamt, press release ”Bundeskartellamt initiates proceeding against Facebook on suspicion of having abused its market power by infringing data protection rules“, March 2, 2016, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2016/02_03_2016_Facebook.html?nn=3591568 (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  128. Bundeskartellamt, Working Paper, “Market Power of Platforms and Networks”, June 2016, available on the internet under https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/EN/Berichte/Think-Tank-Bericht-Langfassung.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (last accessed: 22/06/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  129. Christensen, Clayton M./Raynor, Michael E./McDonald, Rory, “What is Disruptive Innovation”, Harvard Business Review, December 2015, available on the internet under https://hbr.org/2015/12/what-is-disruptive-innovation (last accessed: 15/07/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  130. Cooper, James C., “Privacy and Antitrust: Underpants Gnomes, the First Amendment, and Subjectivity”, George Mason Law Review 2013, 1129–1146, available on the internet under http://www.georgemasonlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Cooper_Website.pdf (last accessed: 24/01/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  131. Crofts, Lewis/McLeod, Robert, MLex Interview: Margrethe Vestager, MLex Special Report, January 2015, pp. 2–8, available on the internet under https://mlexmarketinsight.com/insights-center/reports/interview-with-margrethe-vestager (last accessed: 22/05/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  132. Dietrich, Michael, “Will das Kartellamt zur Superbehörde werden?”, March 11th, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.lto.de/recht/kanzleien-unternehmen/k/facebook-entscheidung-bundeskartellamt-wettbewerbsrecht-datenschutzverstoss-superbehoerde-zustaendigkeit-rechtsbereiche/ (last accessed: 01/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  133. Dworschak, Manfred/Rosenbach, Marcel/Schmundt, Hilmar, “Planet der Freundschaft“, May 7th, 2012, available on the internet under https://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-85586231.html (last accessed: 06/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  134. Engels, Barbara/Grunewald, Mara, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, IW-Kurzbericht Nr. 57: “DAS PRIVACY PARADOX – Digitalisierung versus Privatsphäre“, August 14th, 2017, available on the internet under https://www.iwkoeln.de/studien/iw-kurzberichte/beitrag/barbara-engels-mara-grunewald-das-privacy-paradox-digitalisierung-versus-privatsphaere-356747.html (last accessed: 09/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  135. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe – Analysis and Evidence, SWD(2015) 100 final, available on the internet under https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52015SC0100&from=EN (last accessed: 23/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  136. European Commission, Competition policy for the digital era – A report by Jacques Crémer, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye and Heike Schweitzer, available on the internet under https://ec.europa.eu/competition/publications/reports/kd0419345enn.pdf (last accessed: 01/04/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  137. European Commission, Public Consultation on the regulatory environment for platforms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative economy, September 2015, available on the internet under http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=10932 (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  138. European Commission, press release on the approval of case M.8124 Microsoft/LinkedIn, published 06/12/2016, available on the internet under http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-4284_en.htm (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  139. European Commission, XXIIIrd Report on Competition Policy 1993, available on the internet under https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7db4a243-39f3-4ba4-a5b7-1cb48f8ca6d3 (last accessed: 05/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  140. European Parliament, Challenges for Competition Policy in a Digitalised Economy”, July 2015, available on the internet under http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/542235/IPOL_STU%282015%29542235_EN.pdf (last accessed: 15/07/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  141. Evans, David S, “Multisided Platforms, Dynamic Competition, and the Assessment of Market Power for Internet-Based Firms“, University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 753, available on the internet under https://ssrn.com/abstract=2746095 (last accessed: 03/12/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  142. Facebook Data Policy (Date of Last Revision: April 19, 2018), available on the internet under https://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  143. Facebook, Facebook Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Results, available on the internet under https://s21.q4cdn.com/399680738/files/doc_financials/2018/Q4/Q4-2018-Earnings-Release.pdf (last accessed: 03/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  144. Facebook, Terms of Service, Date of Last Revision: July 31, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.facebook.com/legal/terms/update (last accessed: 22/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  145. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, “Ein neuer Wettbewerbsrahmen für die Digitalwirtschaft – Bericht der Kommission Wettbewerbsrecht 4.0“ (= A New Competition Framework for the Digital Economy – Report by the Commission Competition Law 4.0), available on the internet under https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Wirtschaft/bericht-der-kommission-wettbewerbsrecht-4-0.html (last accessed 01/04/21). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  146. Franke, Sten, “Das neue Social Media Prisma 2017/2018 – Wandel durch Disruptive Innovation“, 16/10/2017, available on the internet under https://ethority.de/2017/10/16/das-neue-social-media-prisma-20172018-wandel-durch-disruptive-innovation/ (last accessed: 15/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  147. Gabriel, Sigmar, “Unsere politischen Konsequenzen aus der Google-Debatte“, May 16th, 2014, available on the internet under https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/die-digital-debatte/sigmar-gabriel-konsequenzen-der-google-debatte-12941865-p5.html (last accessed: 13/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  148. Gersemann, Olaf, “Zerschlagt Facebook nicht!”, April 4th, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.welt.de/print/die_welt/debatte/article175406752/Leitartikel-Zerschlagt-Facebook-nicht.html (last accessed: 13/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  149. Graef, Inge, “Stretching EU Competition Law Tools for Search Engines and Social Networks”, Internet Policy Review 2015, available on the internet under https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2655555 (last accessed: 23/07/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  150. Graw, Ansgar, “Facebook – Ein Monopol, das zerschlagen gehört”, April 4th, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.welt.de/debatte/kommentare/article175369044/Mark-Zuckerbergs-Werk-Facebook-ein-Monopol-das-zerschlagen-gehoert.html (last accessed: 13/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  151. Hanfeld, Michael, “Was erlauben Facebook?”, June 26th 2019, available on the internet under https://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/warum-facebook-wirklich-nach-regulierung-ruft-16253951.html (last accessed: 14/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  152. Hartman, Philipp Max/Zaki, Mohamed/Feldmann, Niels/Neely, “Big Data for Big Business? A Taxonomy of Data-driven Business Models used by Start-up Firms”, March 2014, available on the internet under https://cambridgeservicealliance.eng.cam.ac.uk/resources/Downloads/Monthly%20Papers/2014_March_DataDrivenBusinessModels.pdf (last accessed: 12/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  153. Hasse, Marc, “So entziehen Sie sich Googles Datensammlung“, March 3rd, 2012, available on the internet under https://www.abendblatt.de/ratgeber/wissen/article107752170/So-entziehen-Sie-sich-Googles-Datensammlung.html (last accessed: 06/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  154. Hein, Christoph/Hendricks, Frank, “Data-Driven-Company”, Business Intelligence Magazine, available on the internet under https://www.bi-magazine.net/data-driven-company.html (last accessed: 12/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  155. Herz, Martin/Vedder, Hans H.B., “A Commentary on Article 102 TFEU”, available on the internet under https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2977195 (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  156. Holzki, Larissa/Neuerer, Dietmar, “OLG Düsseldorf kassiert Vorwürfe des Kartellamts gegen Facebook“, August 26th, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.handelsblatt.com/technik/it-internet/datenschutz-olg-duesseldorf-kassiert-vorwuerfe-des-kartellamts-gegen-facebook/24943100.html?ticket=ST-10780336-fQe2mQy0vL0ak5RT1F5e-ap4 (last accessed: 10/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  157. House of Lords – Select Committee on European Union, Online Platforms and the Digital Single Market, HL Paper 129 2015–16, available on the internet under https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201516/ldselect/ldeucom/129/129.pdf (last accessed: 22/06/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  158. Huang, Elaine, “Facebook’s US$1b data centre in Singapore to open in 2022”, October 29th, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.edb.gov.sg/en/news-and-events/insights/innovation/facebook-s-us-1b-data-centre-in-singapore-to-open-in-2022.html (last accessed 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  159. Hülsen, Isabell/Müller, Peter, “Haben sich die deutschen Autokonzerne abgesprochen, um Innovationen zu verhindern? Hier spricht EU-Wettbewerbskommissarin Vestager über ihre Ermittlungen und die Marktmacht von Facebook“, April 12th, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.spiegel.de/plus/margrethe-vestager-daimler-vw-und-bmw-haben-nun-zehn-wochen-zeit-a-00000000-0002-0001-0000-000163403870 (last accessed: 12/11/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  160. Hughes, Chris, “It`s time to break up Facebook“, May 9th, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/opinion/sunday/chris-hughes-facebook-zuckerberg.html (last accessed: 20/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  161. IBM Institute for Business Value, Innovative analytics – How the world’s most successful organizations use analytics to innovate, April 2015, available on the internet under ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/pdf/de/Innovative_analytics_Exec_Report_v42.pdf (last accessed 20/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  162. International Monetary Fund, “Measuring the Digital Economy“, Policy Paper, April 5, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2018/04/03/022818-measuring-the-digital-economy (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  163. Irish Data Protection Commissioner, Facebook Ireland Ltd. Report of Audit, December 21st, 2011, available on the internet under https://www.pdpjournals.com/docs/87980.pdf (last accessed: 06/08/19) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  164. Kimmelman, Gene, “The Right Way to Regulate Digital Platforms“, Harvard Kennedy School – Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, September 18th, 2019, available on the internet under https://shorensteincenter.org/the-right-way-to-regulate-digital-platforms/ (last accessed: 11/11/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  165. Knupfer, Gabriel, “Threema: Meistverkaufte App des Jahres”, December 12, 2014, available on the internet under https://www.handelszeitung.ch/unternehmen/technologie/threema-meistverkaufte-app-des-jahres-709810 (last accessed: 30/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  166. Kroes, Neelie, Speech “European Competition Policy – Delivering Better Markets and Better Choices”, European Consumer and Competition Day, London, 15 September 2005, available on the internet under http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-05-512_en.htm?locale=en (last accessed: 12/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  167. Kühl, Eike, “Zerschlagt, was euch kaputt macht”, May 21st, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2019-05/facebook-zerschlagung-wahlkampf-monopol-soziale-medien-digitalkonzerne/komplettansicht (last accessed: 13/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  168. Kuneva, Meglena, Keynote Speech at the Roundtable on Online Data Collection, Targeting and Profiling, Brussels, 31 March 2009, available on the internet under http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-09-156_en.htm (last accessed: 01/05/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  169. List of acquisitions made by Facebook, available on the internet under https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/facebook/acquisitions/acquisitions_list#section-acquisitions (last accessed: 11/11/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  170. Mansholt, Malte, “Zugriff auf Facebook-Daten: Hier sehen Sie, welche Apps bei Ihnen schnüffeln“, March 21st, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.stern.de/digital/online/zugriff-auf-facebook-daten--hier-sehen-sie--welche-apps-bei-ihnen-schnueffeln-7908578.html (last accessed: 06/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  171. Mielczarek, Detlef Conradi, “Digitale Diskriminierung – Ohne Facebook geht nichts mehr”, November 19th, 2012, available on the internet under https://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2012-11/leserartikel-ohne-facebook (last accessed: 09/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  172. Miller, Rich, “Facebook's $1 Billion Data Center Network”, February 2nd, 2012, available on the internet under https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2012/02/02/facebooks-1-billion-data-center-network (last accessed: 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  173. Monti, Mario, Speech “The Future for Competition Policy in the European Union”, Merchant Taylor`s Hall, London, 9 July 2001, extracts available on the internet under http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-01-340_en.htm?locale=de (last accessed: 12/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  174. Monopolkommission, “Competition Policy: The challenge of digital markets”, Special Report 68, available on the internet under https://www.monopolkommission.de/images/PDF/SG/s68_fulltext_eng.pdf (last accessed: 28/01/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  175. Monopolkommission, Policy Brief, Ausgabe 4 – Januar 2020, available on the internet under https://www.monopolkommission.de/images/Policy_Brief/MK_Policy_Brief_4.pdf (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  176. Monopolkommission, Wettbewerb 2018 – XXII. Hauptgutachten der Monopolkommission gemäß § 44 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GWB, July 3rd, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.monopolkommission.de/images/HG22/HGXXII_Gesamt.pdf (last accessed: 24/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  177. Müller, Claudio, “Der große Google-Test“, July 2nd, 2019, available on the internet under https://www.focus.de/digital/computer/chip-exklusiv/tid-18904/suche-datenschutz-nutzbarkeit-der-grosse-google-test_aid_525753.html (last accessed: 06/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  178. Nocun, Katharina, “Habe meine Daten runtergeladen: Was Facebook alles über mich weiß, hat mich schockiert“, June 26th, 2018, available on the internet under https://www.focus.de/digital/experten/facebook-ich-wusste-dass-facebook-daten-speichert-doch-das-ausmass-hat-mich-erschreckt_id_9145326.html (last accessed: 06/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  179. OECD, “Big Data: Bringing Competition Policy to the Digital Era”, November 29–30, 2016, available on the internet under https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP(2016)14/en/pdf (last accessed: 22/05/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  180. OECD, “Data-driven Innovation for Growth and Well-being – Interim Synthesis Report”, October 2014, available on the internet under https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/data-driven-innovation-interim-synthesis.pdf (last accessed: 22/05/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  181. Paal, Boris P./Hennemann, Moritz, “Big Data as an Asset”, available on the internet under http://www.abida.de/sites/default/files/Gutachten_ABIDA_Big_Data_as_an_Asset.pdf (last accessed: 02/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  182. Pantlin, Nick/Moir, Andrew/Young, Christine/Everett, Miriam/Wiseman, Claire, “Data use: Protecting a critical resource”, available on the internet under https://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/latest-thinking/data-use-protecting-a-critical-resource (last accessed: 22/05/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  183. Peterson, Rachel, “Data centers year in review“, January 1st, 2019, available on the internet under https://engineering.fb.com/data-center-engineering/data-centers-2018/ (last accessed: 16/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  184. Podszun, Rupprecht, D’Kart Antitrust Blog, “Facebook @ BGH”, June 23rd, 2020, available on the internet under https://www.d-kart.de/en/blog/2020/06/23/facebook-bgh/ (last accessed: 24/10/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  185. Podszun, Rupprecht, D’Kart Antitrust Blog, “Facebook: Next Stop Europe”, 25. March 2021, available on the internet under https://www.d-kart.de/en/blog/2021/03/25/facebook-next-stop-europe/ (last accessed: 17/04/21). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  186. Podszun, Rupprecht, D’Kart Antitrust Blog, “Facebook Case: The Reasoning”, August 28th, 2020, available on the internet under https://www.d-kart.de/blog/2020/08/28/facebook-case-the-reasoning/#comments (last accessed: 26/10/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  187. PWC, “Big Data – Bedeutung Nutzen Mehrwert“, available on the internet under https://www.pwc.de/de/prozessoptimierung/assets/pwc-big-data-bedeutung-nutzen-mehrwert.pdf (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  188. Roßnagel, Alexander/Pfitzmann, Andreas/Garstka,Hansjürgen, “Modernisierung des Datenschutzrechts”, report commissioned by the Federal Ministry of the Interior, Berlin 2002, available on the internet under https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fa68/4e56317983fb6c379f29de8f61b4e22d3087.pdf (last accessed: 12/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  189. Sasse, Robert, “A Micro-Economic Perspective on Social Media in Context of the New Economy”, available on the internet under http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.m2economics.20160402.03.html (last accessed: 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  190. Statista, “Anteil der Internetnutzer nach Altersgruppen in der Generation 50plus in Deutschland in ausgewählten Jahren von 2011 bis 2017“, available on the internet under https://statista.extdb.e-fellows.net/statistik/daten/studie/568561/umfrage/anteil-der-internetnutzer-in-deutschland-in-der-generation-50plus/ (last accessed: 09/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  191. Statista, “Bevölkerung – Zahl der Einwohner in Deutschland nach Altersgruppen am 31. Dezember 2017 (in Millionen)“, available on the internet under https://statista.extdb.e-fellows.net/statistik/daten/studie/1365/umfrage/bevoelkerung-deutschlands-nach-altersgruppen/ (last accessed: 09/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  192. Stelzer, Dirk, “Digitale Güter und ihre Bedeutung in der Internet-Ökonomie“, available on the internet under https://www.tu-ilmenau.de/fileadmin/public/iwm/diggut.pdf (last accessed: 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  193. Temple Lang, John/O’Donoghue, Robert, “Defining Legitimate Competition: How to Clarify Pricing Abuses Under Article 82 EC”, Fordham International Law Journal 2002, 83–162, available on the internet under https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1866&context=ilj (last accessed: 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  194. Thierer, Adam, “The Perils of Classifying Social Media Platforms as Public Utilities”, Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy 2013, 249–297, available on the internet under https://scholarship.law.edu/commlaw/vol21/iss2/2/ (last accessed: 13/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  195. Tim Wu, “In the Grip of the Internet Monopolists“, November 13th, 2010, available on the internet under https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704635704575604993311538482 (last accessed 02/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  196. Varian, Hal R., “Economic of Information Technology”, available on the internet under http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/mattioli/mattioli.pdf (last accessed 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  197. Vestager, Margrethe, Speech at the EDPS-BEUC Conference on Big Data, Brussels 29 September 2016, available on the internet under https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20191129222113/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/big-data-and-competition_en (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  198. Vestager, Margrethe, Speech “Building a positive digital world”, Digital Summit, Dortmund (Germany), October 29, 2019, available on the internet under https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20191130020041/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/building-positive-digital-world_en (last accessed: 28/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  199. Vestager, Margrethe, Speech “Competition is a consumer issue“ in front of the BEUC General Assembly, 13 May 2016, available on the internet under https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20191129205633/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/competition-consumer-issue_en (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  200. Vestager, Margrethe, Speech “Competition in changing times“ on the occasion of the FIW Symposium in Innsbruck (Germany), 16 February 2018, available on the internet under https://wayback.archive-it.org/12090/20191129215248/https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/vestager/announcements/competition-changing-times-0_en (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  201. Vestager, Margrethe, Speech “Keeping the EU competitive in a green and gitial world”, College of Europe, Bruges, March 2, 2020, available on the internet under https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/vestager/announcements/keeping-eu-competitive-green-and-digital-world_en (last accessed: 28/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  202. Vestager, Margrethe, Speech “Shaping a digital future for Europe“, Symposium on Digitalisation, The Hague, February 3, 2020, available on the internet under https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/vestager/announcements/shaping-digital-future-europe_en (last accessed: 27/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  203. Waehrer, Keith, “Online services and the analysis of competitive merger effects in privacy protections and other quality dimensions”, July 8, 2016, available on the internet under https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2701927 (last accessed: 20/06/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  204. Ward, Jonathan Stuart/Barker, Adam, “Undefined By Data: A Survey of Big Data Definitions”, September 20, 2013, available on the internet under https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.5821.pdf (last accessed: 22/05/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  205. Wirtschaftswoche, “Welche Menschen die deutsche Internetwirtschaft bewegen“, 07/05/2012, available on the internet under https://www.wiwo.de/technologie/digitale-welt/plaetze-21-bis-100-plaetze-61-bis-100/6598926-2.html (last accessed: 15/08/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  206. Yang, Qing/Ji, Yun, “The Platform Economy and Natural Monopoly: regulating or laissez-faire?”, available on the internet under https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b270/28b47b26656356b08115d52cb981b61e6358.pdf (last accessed: 01/10/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  207. Zanfir-Fortuna, Gabriela/Ianc, Sînziana, “Data Protection and Competition Law: The Dawn of ”Uberprotection”, available on the internet under https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3290824 (last accessed: 16/03/20). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370
  208. Zech, Herbert, “Data as a Tradeable Commodity – Implications for Contract Law”, available on the internet under https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3063153 (last accessed: 24/09/19). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748921370

Similar publications

from the series "Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Europäische Rechtspolitik der Universität Bremen (ZERP)"
Cover of book: Konflikt und Transformation: Essays zur Europäischen Rechtspolitik
Monograph No access
Christian Joerges
Konflikt und Transformation: Essays zur Europäischen Rechtspolitik
Cover of book: Ökologische Aspekte im öffentlich-rechtlichen Beschaffungswesen
Monograph No access
Felix Steengrafe
Ökologische Aspekte im öffentlich-rechtlichen Beschaffungswesen
Cover of book: Substance and Style
Monograph No access
Christiane Gerstetter
Substance and Style
Cover of book: What Place for Fairness in Digital Content Contracts?
Monograph No access
Agustin Reyna
What Place for Fairness in Digital Content Contracts?
Cover of book: The Relationship between Trade-Related Environmental Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the WTO Law
Monograph No access
Lidia Rieder
The Relationship between Trade-Related Environmental Measures in Multilateral Environmental Agreements and the WTO Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex