Protecting Life by Investigating Death

Sam McIntosh

doi:10.5771/9783214251475

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2022
ISBN-Print: 978-3-214-02688-2
ISBN-Online: 978-3-214-25147-5
Publisher: MANZ, Wien
Series: Menschen.Rechte! – Schriftenreihe des Ludwig Boltzmann Instituts für Grund- und Menschenrechte
Volume: 2
Language: English
Pages: 412
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages I - XX
1. The Location of the Analysis within the Literature No access
2. Methodology No access
3. Structure No access
4. The Argument No access
5. A brief introduction to human rights obligations to investigate deaths No access
1. 1. A very brief introduction to the case of McCann v. the United Kingdom No access
  2. 1. The basic content of Article 2 ECHR No access
  3. 2. The prohibition on arbitrarily taking life No access
  4. 1. a) Use-of-force deaths with intervening elements No access
  5. 1. a) The positive obligation and threats from third parties No access
    2. b) Self-inflicted deaths in prisons No access
    3. c) Non-custodial self-inflicted deaths No access
    4. 1. aa) Accidents No access
      2. bb) Industrial accidents (including those exacerbated by natural phenomena) No access
    5. 1. aa) Powell v. the United Kingdom and a limited investigative -obligation in -healthcare-related case No access
      2. bb) The consolidation of Powell No access
      3. cc) Exceptions to the general rule in healthcare-related cases No access
      4. dd) The meaning of ‘insufficient to call a State to account’ No access
      5. ee) An obligation to provide life-saving healthcare No access
      6. ff) Conclusions on healthcare-related cases No access
  6. 5. Conclusion on Article 2 ECHR’s substantive obligations No access
2. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 2. The basic investigative obligation and its purposes No access
  3. 1. a) Kaya v. Turkey No access
    2. b) Ergi v. Turkey-The burden is on the State to initiate an investigation No access
    3. c) Salman v. Turkey-The burden on States to explain deaths in custody No access
    4. 1. The facts of the cases in brief No access
      2. The law No access
      3. Applying the law to the facts of the cases No access
    5. e) Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom-Openness and the public interest in cases No access
    6. f) Ramsahai v. the Netherlands-The free-standing nature of the full investigative obligation No access
    7. g) Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom-Investigations in difficult circumstances No access
    8. h) Conclusions on use-of-force deaths at the hands of the State and the contents of the full investigative obligation No access
  4. 4. Investigations and use-of-force deaths at the hands of non-State actors No access
  5. 5. Investigations into self-inflicted deaths in custody No access
  6. 6. Investigations into non-custodial self-inflicted deaths No access
  7. 7. Conclusions on investigations into violent deaths at the hands of non-State actors and self-inflicted deaths No access
  8. 1. a) Accidents No access
    2. 1. Early healthcare-related admissibility decisions No access
      2. Powell v. the United Kingdom No access
      3. aa) Mammadov v. Azerbaijan and its implications for healthcare-related cases No access
      4. Conclusion to Chapter B No access
      5. Postscript to Chapters A and B-the case of Safi and Others v. Greece (2022) No access
3. 1. 1. Meaning of jurisdiction No access
    2. ARTICLE 1 Obligation to respect Human Rights No access
    3. ARTICLE 56 Territorial application No access
  2. 1. The overlap of Article 2 and Article 3 caselaw No access
  3. 1. a) Drozd and Janousek v. France and Spain, and early cases No access
    2. b) Loizidou v. Turkey and Ramirez Sanchez v. France No access
    3. c) Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and Others No access
    4. d) Rowing back on Bankovic: Issa and Others v. Turkey, Pad and Others v. Turkey, Andreou v. Turkey, and Al-Skeini v. the United Kingdom No access
    5. e) Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy No access
    6. f) Vasiliciuc v. the Republic of Moldova No access
    7. g) Jurisdiction arising out of military occupation or the sponsorship of separatist entities No access
    8. 1. aa) Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia No access
      2. bb) O’Loughlin v. the United Kingdom No access
      3. cc) Güzelyurtlu and Others v. Cyprus and Turkey No access
    9. i) M.N. v. Belgium No access
    10. j) Georgia v. Russia (II)-A Context of Chaos No access
  4. 4. Conclusions No access
  5. 5. Accession of the European Union to the ECHR No access
1. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 1. a) Article 2 CFREU No access
    2. b) Article 4 CFREU No access
  3. 3. The jurisdictional scope of the Charter No access
  4. 4. Conclusions on the CFREU No access
2. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 2. The scope and content of the ICCPR’s relevant substantive rights No access
  3. 1. Article 24 (the right of children to special protection) No access
    2. Reporting obligations No access
  4. 1. A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Italy and A.S., D.I., O.I. and G.D. v. Malta No access
  5. 5. Conclusions on the ICCPR No access
3. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 1. What sort of behaviour might amount to torture under the Convention? No access
    2. What Amounts to Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment? No access
  3. 1. Other investigative requirements under the CAT No access
  4. 1. The jurisdictional implications of Article 3 No access
  5. 5. Conclusions on the Convention Against Torture No access
4. 1. 1. Introduction No access
  2. 2. Relevant substantive provisions No access
  3. 3. Relevant procedural provisions under the CRC No access
  4. 4. Jurisdiction and the CRC No access
  5. 5. Conclusions on the CRC No access
Conclusion No access Pages 381 - 388
Index No access Pages 389 - 412