International Criminal Law before Domestic Courts

Michael Lysander Fremuth; Andreas Sauermoser; Konstantina Stavrou

doi:10.5771/9783214258924

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2024
ISBN-Print: 978-3-214-25613-5
ISBN-Online: 978-3-214-25892-4
Publisher: MANZ, Wien
Series: Menschen.Rechte! – Schriftenreihe des Ludwig Boltzmann Instituts für Grund- und Menschenrechte
Volume: 3
Language: English
Pages: 358
Product type: Edited Book

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages I - X
Introduction No access Pages 1 - 4 Michael Lysander Fremuth, Andreas Sauermoser, Konstantina Stavrou
Michael Lysander Fremuth
1. I. The Joint Path Leading to a Peaceful Revolution of Public International Law No access
2. II. Joint Dimensions of Common Values and Human Dignity at their Core No access
3. III. The Idea of Universality No access
4. 1. A. Human Rights in International Criminal Law Proceedings No access
  2. 1. 1. The Human Rights Dimension of International Core Crimes No access
    2. 2. Human Rights-friendly Interpretation of International Criminal Norms No access
    3. 3. A Human Rights Obligation to Prosecute International Core Crimes? No access
5. V. Forum Shopping between International Human Rights Law and International Criminal Law No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
Kai Ambos
1. I. Preliminary Remarks No access
2. 1. A. Transnationality of Business Activities as Key Feature No access
  2. B. Multinational Enterprise as Something Else? No access
  3. C. A Working Definition and Additional Criteria No access
3. 1. A. General Considerations No access
  2. B. Jurisdiction over (Transnational) Corporations, Especially the Draft Treaty on Business and Human Rights No access
  3. C. Jurisdiction versus Attribution No access
Nicolas Angelet, Anna Facchinetti, Marta Duch Giménez
1. I. Introduction No access
2. 1. A. The Establishment of the Truth No access
  2. B. The Right of Victims to be Heard and Recognised as Victims No access
  3. C. Closure and Memory Building No access
  4. D. Compensation No access
  5. E. Confirmation of the Violated Norm No access
  6. F. Punishment and Deterrence, Naming and Shaming No access
  7. G. Interim Conclusion No access
3. 1. 1. 1. Investigations No access
    2. 2. Pre-trial Measures of Constraint No access
    3. 3. Publicity No access
    4. 4. Prosecution, Finding of Responsibility and Punishment No access
    5. 5. Indirect Finding of Responsibility No access
  2. 1. 1. Non-Judicial Sanctions No access
    2. 2. Compensation by the Forum State No access
4. 1. A. Using the Outcome of Judicial Investigations per se No access
  2. B. Using the Outcome of Judicial Investigations as a Basis for Non-Judicial Measures No access
Leslie Johns, Máximo Langer, Margaret E Peters
1. I. Introduction No access
2. 1. A. International and Domestic Justice No access
  2. B. Migrants and Diasporas No access
  3. C. Universal Jurisdiction as Transnational Justice No access
3. III. Theory: How Migrants Promote Universal Jurisdiction No access
4. 1. 1. 1. Outcome Measure No access
    2. 2. Explanatory Variables No access
  2. B. Estimation No access
5. 1. A. Main Results No access
  2. B. Robustness Checks No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
7. VII. Final Notes No access
Noelle Higgins
1. I. Preface No access
2. II. Introduction No access
3. III. The Meaning of ‘Culture’ and the ‘Cultural Defence’ No access
4. 1. A. The Impact of Culture on a Person - Enculturation No access
  2. B. Individualised Justice No access
  3. 1. 1. The Right To Culture No access
    2. 2. Religion and Culture No access
    3. 3. The Right to a Fair Trial No access
    4. 4. Cultural Relativism No access
    5. 5. Culture, Human Rights and the ICC No access
5. 1. 1. 1. Mental Incapacity, Disease, or Defect No access
    2. 2. Intoxication No access
    3. 3. Self-defence, defence of others and defence of property No access
    4. 4. Duress or Necessity No access
    5. 5. Article 32: Mistake of Fact or Law No access
    6. 6. Superior Orders No access
    7. 7. A Cultural Defence as Another Ground for Excluding Criminal Responsibility No access
6. VI. Summary No access
Stefanie Bock
1. I. Introduction - The Multilevel System of International Criminal Justice No access
2. II. The Koblenz Torture Trial and the Dissemination of Court Interpretation No access
3. III. Roots and Function of the Principle of Open Justice No access
4. IV. Meaning of Public No access
5. 1. A. Distant Justice and Control of the Judiciary No access
  2. B. Transparency and Judicial Accountability in International Settings No access
  3. C. International Transparency and the Goals of International Criminal Justice No access
6. VI. Re-Defining Open Justice in Core Crimes Proceedings No access
Matevž Pezdirc, Chloé Faucourt
1. I. Introduction No access
2. 1. A. The Fight against Impunity is an EU Problem No access
  2. 1. 1. Eurojust, the EU Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation No access
    2. 1. a) Exchange of Information, Expertise and Best Practices No access
      2. b) Facilitation of Contacts with Main Stakeholders No access
      3. c) Outreach and Awareness-raising No access
      4. d) Capacity-building and Training No access
    3. 1. a) Integration of International Obligations into National Law No access
      2. b) Specialisation as a Core Requirement No access
      3. c) Cooperation with National and International Stakeholders No access
      4. d) Engagement with Victims and Witnesses No access
      5. e) Ensuring Political Support and Awareness No access
3. 1. A. Innovations in National Case Law: Recourse to Cumulative Prosecutions and Battlefield Evidence No access
  2. B. Landmark Convictions Obtained in JIT-Supported Investigation No access
  3. C. Interlinkages between Sanctions Violations and Core International Crimes No access
  4. D. Building Stronger Partnerships with Civil Society Organisations No access
4. IV. Conclusion No access
Harmen van der Wilt
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. Criminal Responsibility for Peripheral Contributions to Terrorist Offences No access
3. III. Cumulation of Terrorist Offences and War Crimes No access
4. IV. Dutch Courts’ Grabbling with IHL and ICL Issues No access
5. V. Final Reflections and Conclusion No access
Jasenka Ferizovic
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. Methodology No access
3. III. Prosecution of Atrocity Crimes before the Court of BiH: A General Overview No access
4. IV. Judicial Notice in Atrocity Crimes Cases Prosecuted before the Court of BiH: A General Overview No access
5. 1. 1. 1. Purpose of Judicial Notice No access
    2. 2. Legal and Procedural Effects of Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts No access
    3. 1. a) the fact must be distinct, concrete, and identifiable No access
      2. b) the fact must not be vague or misleading in the context in which it is placed in a party’s motion No access
      3. c) the moving party must identify the fact with sufficient precision No access
      4. d) the wording of the proposed fact must not differ substantially from its formulation in the original judgment No access
      5. e) the fact is limited to factual findings and must not include findings or characterisations that are of an essentially legal nature No access
      6. f) the fact was contested at trial (ie it is not based on the agreement of the parties to the original proceedings) No access
      7. g) the fact was adjudicated by final decision No access
      8. h) the fact does not attest to the criminal responsibility of the defendant No access
      9. i) the fact is not subject to (reasonable) dispute between the parties in the present case No access
      10. j) the fact must be relevant No access
      11. k) the fact does not impact on the defendant’s right to a fair trial No access
    4. 4. Procedure for Taking Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts No access
  2. B. Opposing Party Objections to Motions for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts No access
  3. C. Court’s Rulings on Motions for Judicial Notice of ICTY-adjudicated Facts No access
6. VI. Conclusion No access
Christine Gödl
1. I. Introduction No access
2. 1. A. General Remarks No access
  2. 1. 1. Austrian Jurisdiction for Offences under Division Twenty-five No access
    2. 1. a) Crimes against Humanity No access
      2. b) War Crimes against Persons No access
      3. c) War Crimes against Property or other Rights No access
      4. d) War Crimes against International Missions and Misuse of International Protection Emblems and National Insignia No access
      5. e) War Crime of Using Prohibited Methods or Means of Warfare No access
      6. f) War Crime of Using Prohibited Means of Warfare No access
      7. g) The Crime of Aggression - Article 321k No access
  3. C. Amendments in the Austrian Code of Criminal Procedure No access
3. 1. A. General Remarks No access
  2. B. Jurisprudence under Division 25 of the Austrian Criminal Code No access
  3. 1. 1. General Remarks No access
    2. 2. The History and Origin of the Provisions No access
    3. 3. The Terrorist Association under the Austrian Criminal Code No access
    4. 4. The Membership in the Terrorist Association No access
    5. 1. a) Initiating a Travel to Syria No access
      2. b) Promise to Marry Fighters of the Islamic State No access
      3. c) Support of the Islamic State through Promising to Marry Fighters 12Os45/16h No access
4. VI. Conclusion No access
Federica D’Alessandra, Kirsty Sutherland
1. I. Changing Landscape in International Justice No access
2. 1. A. Ensuring Public Transparency and Accountability No access
  2. B. Challenging False Narratives and Upholding State Responsibility No access
  3. C. Pursuing Individual Responsibility No access
3. 1. A. Collection and Sharing of Evidence No access
  2. 1. 1. General Challenges No access
    2. 2. Criminal Justice Challenges No access
  3. C. Archiving and Storage No access
4. 1. A. Third Party Control of Digital Information and Evidence: The Thorny Question of Social Media Com No access
5. V. Conclusions No access
Dearbhla Minogue, Siobhán Allen, Charlotte Andrews-Briscoe, Yvonne McDermott
1. I. Introduction No access
2. 1. 1. 1. Fictional Underlying Case No access
    2. 2. Evidence No access
    3. 3. Actors No access
  2. 1. 1. Overview No access
    2. 1. a) Prosecution No access
      2. b) Defence No access
    3. 3. Evidence Provided No access
    4. 1. a) Open Source Analysis as Expert Evidence No access
      2. b) Admissibility of the Exhibit CG/2 Video No access
3. 1. A. The Categorisation of OAVC Evidence and the Concept of Authenticity No access
  2. B. The Importance of Tailoring What Claims Are Made About the Video No access
  3. C. Open Source Investigative Analysis as Expert Evidence No access
  4. 1. 1. Bias No access
    2. 2. Chain of Custody No access
    3. 3. Types of Expertise Within No access
    4. 4. Duties on Investigators No access
  5. 1. 1. The Expert’s Online Search No access
    2. 2. The Other Videos No access
4. IV. Conclusion No access
Konstantina Stavrou
1. I. Introduction No access
2. II. Potential Risks Related to the Reliance on User-Generated Content No access
3. III. Risks Related to the Reliance on User-Generated Content as Seen in the Jurisprudence of European Domestic Courts No access
4. IV. Assessment of User-Generated Evidence No access
5. V. Conclusion No access