The Stage as Palimpsest: Conceptions of Time and Temporality in Shakespeare&#039;s &quot;Troilus and Cressida&quot; and &quot;The Two Noble Kinsmen&quot;

Dr. Karoline Johanna Baumann

doi:10.5771/9783956504662

Summary

Die Studie untersucht frühneuzeitliche Epochenkonzepte mit dem Ziel einer kritischen Hinterfragung des Selbstverständnisses der Neuzeit und der damit verbundenen, das Mittelalter marginalisierenden Periodisierungskonzepte. Sie zeigt, wie auf der frühneuzeitlichen Bühne Begriffe von Zeit und Zeitlichkeit durchgespielt werden, für die die Vorstellung von Linearität und Fortschrittsgeschichtsschreibung, die unseren Epochenbegriffen zugrunde liegt, zu kurz greift. Vielmehr legen beide Stücke, auf antiken Quellen basierend, aber sowohl im Mittelalter als auch in der Neuzeit vielfach umgeschrieben und neu interpretiert, einen palimpsestartigen Zeitbegriff nahe. Ein Palimpsest enthält verschiedene Zeitstufen nicht in sukzessiver oder chronologischer Anordnung, sondern unhierarchisch neben- und übereinandergelagert. So wird die Frage nach der Epochenkonstruktion bei Shakespeare performativ gestellt, mit besonderem Fokus auf der Erfindung des Mittelalters.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2018
Copyright Year: 2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-95650-465-5
ISBN-Online: 978-3-95650-466-2
Publisher: Ergon, Baden-Baden
Series: Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Literaturwissenschaft
Volume: 6
Language: English
Pages: 160
Product Type: Monograph

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 6
Introduction No access Pages 7 - 18
1. I.1. Troilus and Cressida as a medieval in(ter)vention No access
2. I.2. Polychronic text – the palimpsest No access
3. I.3. The medieval/early modern dichotomy No access
4. I.4. Troilus true and Cressida false? The performative power of discourse No access
1. II.1. The Prologue: “Constant to eternity” No access
2. II.2. “I carry winged time”: The Gower figure in Pericles No access
3. II.3. The funeral-marriage No access
4. II.4. “I am your heir and you are mine”: Figurations of Palamon and Arcite No access
5. II.5. ‘Thebanness’ and ‘Athenness’ No access
6. II.6. Polychronicity and Multitemporality No access
7. II.7. Theseus, Creon and the gods No access
8. II. 8. “Nat fully quyke, ne fully dede they were” No access
9. II.9. Compulsory heterosexual marriage and linear time No access
10. II.10. Pericles: Authorship, patriarchy, the “dynastic agenda” and linear time No access
11. II.11. The Great Mover’s Speech – Palamon and Arcite’s function for Theseus No access
12. II.12. Structural repetition No access
Conclusion No access Pages 147 - 150
Bibliography No access Pages 151 - 160

Bibliography (157 entries)

PRIMARY SOURCES Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Beaumont, Francis and John Fletcher, The Maid’s Tragedy, in English Renaissance Drama: A Norton Anthology, ed. by David Bevington and others (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2002), pp.1147-1214. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Caxton, William, The Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye, ed. by H. Oskar Sommer (New York: AMS Press, 1973). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Chapman’s Homer: The Iliad, ed. by Allardyce Nicoll (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Fletcher, John and William Shakespeare, The Two Noble Kinsmen, ed. by Lois Potter, Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Thomson Learning, 1997). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Fletcher, John and William Shakespeare, The Two Noble Kinsmen, ed. by Eugene M. Waith, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Geoffrey Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde with facing-page Il Filostrato, ed. by Stephen A. Barney (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Gower, John, Confessio Amantis, ed. by Russell A. Peck (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
John Donne: Complete Poetry and Selected Prose, ed. by John Hayward (New York: Random House Inc., 1949). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version: Containing the Old and New Testaments Translated from the Original Tongues, being the Version set forth A.D. 1611, revised A.D. 1881-1885 and A.D. 1901, Compared with the most Ancient Authorities and Revised A.D. 1946-1952 (New York: Meridian, 1974). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Homer, The Iliad, trans. and with an introduction by Richmond Lattimore (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Homer, The Iliad, The Odyssey, trans. and with an introduction by Richmond Lattimore (New York: Harper, 1965, 2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Horace, Ars Poetica, ed. with notes by Augustus S. Wilkins (London: Macmillan, 1939). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Lydgate, John, Troy Book, ed. by Henry Bergen (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1906-1935). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ovid, Metamorphoses, ed. and trans. by Charles Martin (New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ovidius Naso, Publius, Metamorphoseon libri quindecim. Lateinisch/ Deutsch, ed. and trans. by Michael von Albrecht (Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 1994, 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ovid’s Metamorphoses: The Arthur Golding Translation 1567, ed. by John Frederick Nims (New York: Macmillan, 1965). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
The Riverside Chaucer, ed. by Larry D. Benson, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shakespeare, William, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, ed. by Peter Holland, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shakespeare, William, Julius Caesar, ed. by David Daniell, The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Methuen, 1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shakespeare, William, Pericles, ed. by Suzanne Gossett, The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Thomson Learning, 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shakespeare, William, Romeo and Juliet, ed. by Jill L. Levenson, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shakespeare, William, Troilus and Cressida, ed. by David Bevington, The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Thomson Learning, 1998, 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Sophocles, Antigone, in Sophocles I: Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone, ed. by David Grene and Richmond Lattimore (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp.159-212. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Statius, Publius Papinius, The Thebaid: Seven Against Thebes, trans. and with an introduction by Charles Stanley Ross (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Virgil, The Aeneid, trans. by C. Day Lewis, with an introduction and notes by Jasper Griffin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Webster, John, The Duchess of Malfi, in English Renaissance Drama: A Norton Anthology, ed. by David Bevington and others (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2002), pp. 1749-1832. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
William Shakespeare: Complete Works, ed. by Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen, The RSC Shakespeare (London: Macmillan, 2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
William Shakespeare: The Complete Works, ed. by Stanley Wells and others, The Oxford Shakespeare, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
SECONDARY SOURCES Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Abrams, Richard, “Gender Confusion and Sexual Politics in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Drama, Sex and Politics, Themes in Drama 7, ed. by James Redmond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp.69-76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Aers, David, “A Whisper in the Ear of Early Modernists; or, Reflections on Literary Critics Writing the ‘History of the Subject’”, in Culture and History 1350-1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities and Writing, ed. by David Aers (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992), pp.177-202. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin, Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies (New York, London: Routledge, 1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Barr, Helen, “‘Wrinkled deep in time’: Emily and Arcite in A Midsummer Night’s Dream”, in Transporting Chaucer (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014), 140-165. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Baudelaire, Charles, Artificial Paradises, trans. by Stacy Diamond (New York: Citadel Press, 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations, trans. by Harry Zohn, ed. and with an introduction by Hannah Arendt (New York: Schocken Books, 2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Benjamin, Walter, Über den Begriff der Geschichte, ed. by Gérard Raulet (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Berns, Ute, “Interioritätskonstruktionen und Freundschaftsdiskurs bei Shakespeare”, Shakespeare Jahrbuch 144 (2008), pp. 148-167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Bethke, Kathrin, “Nothings monstered”: Economies of Pride in ‘Coriolanus’ and ‘Troilus and Cressida’, unpublished paper held at the Shakespeare Association of America’s 40th Annual Convention, Boston, 6 April 2012. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Bhabha, Homi K., “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation”, in Bhabha, The Location of Culture (New York, London: Routledge, 1994), pp.199-244. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Biddick, Kathleen, The Typological Imaginary: History, Technology, Circumcision (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Bradbrook, M.C., “What Shakespeare Did to Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde”, Shakespeare Quarterly, 9:3 (1958), pp.311-319. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Braden, Gordon, “Shakespeare’s Roman Tragedies”, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies, ed. by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 2006), pp.199-218. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Briggs, Julia Ruth, “‘Chaucer … the Story Gives:’ Troilus and Cressida and The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in: Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Settings, ed. by Martha W. Driver and Sid Ray (Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company, 2009), pp.161-177. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Burckhardt, Jacob, The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. by S.G.C. Middlemore, Introduction by Benjamin Nelson and Charles Trinkaus (New York: Harper, 1958). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Butler, Judith, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” (New York, London: Routledge, 1993). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Butler, Judith, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (New York, London: Routledge, 1997). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cantor, Norman F., The Last Knight: The Twilight of the Middle Ages and the Birth of the Modern Era (New York: Free Press, 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Carney, Jo Eldridge, “The Ambiguities of Love and War in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Sexuality and Politics in Renaissance Drama. Studies in Renaissance Literature Vol. 10, ed. by Carole Levin and Karen Robertson (Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press, 1991), pp.95-111. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Caxton’s Trace: Studies in the History of English Printing, ed. by William Kuskin (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Certeau, Michel de, Heterologies: Discourse on the Other, trans. by Brian Massumi, foreword by Wlad Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, 1995). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Certeau, Michel de, The Writing of History, trans. by Tom Conley (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
The Challenge of Periodization: Old Paradigms and New Perspectives, ed. by Lawrence Besserman (New York: Garland, 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cheney, Patrick, Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, “Introduction: Midcolonial”, in The Postcolonial Middle Ages, ed. by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen (London: Macmillan Press, 2000), pp.1-17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, Medieval Identity Machines. Medieval Cultures 35 (Minneapolis/ London: University of Minnesota Press, 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cook, Carol, “Unbodied Figures of Desire”, Theatre Journal 38:1: Dramatic Narration, Theatrical Disruption (1986), 34-52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cooper, Helen, The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Crocker, Holly, “‘As False as Cressid’: Virtue Trouble from Chaucer to Shakespeare”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 43:2 (2013), 303-334. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History, ed. by James Simpson and Brian Cummings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Dagenais, John and Margaret R. Greer, “Decolonizing the Middle Ages: Introduction”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 30:3 (2000), 431-448. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Davis, Alex, “Living in the Past: Thebes, Periodization, and The Two Noble Kinsmen”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 40:1 (2010), 173-195. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Davis, Kathleen, “National Writing in the Ninth Century: A Reminder for Postcolonial Thinking about the Nation”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 28:3 (1998), 611-637. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Davis, Kathleen, Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Dinshaw, Carolyn, Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Donaldson, Ethelbert Talbot, The Swan at the Well: Shakespeare Reading Chaucer (New Haven, Ct.: Yale University Press, 1985). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Driver, Martha W. and Sid Ray, Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Settings (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Elton, William R., Shakespeare’s ‘Troilus and Cressida’ and the Inns of Court Revels (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ferguson, Margaret W., “Feathers and Flies: Aphra Behn and the Seventeenth-Century Trade in Exotica”, in Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, ed. by Margreta de Grazia, Maureen Quilligan and Peter Stallybrass (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.235-259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ferguson, Wallace K., The Renaissance in Historical Thought. Five Centuries of Interpretation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1948). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Foucault, Michel, The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Vintage Books, 1972, 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction (New York: Vintage Books, 1978, 1990). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Fumerton, Patricia, “Introduction: A New New Historicism”, in Renaissance Culture and the Everyday, ed. by Patricia Fumerton and Simon Hunt (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), pp.1-17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
The Future of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Problems, Trends, and Opportunities for Research, ed. by Roger Dahood (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ganim, John M., Medievalism and Orientalism: Three Essays on Literature, Architecture and Cultural Identity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Genette, Gérard, Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press, 1997). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
de Grazia, Margreta, “The Modern Divide: From Either Side”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 453-467. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Greene, Jody, “The Two Noble Kinsmen: Philadelphia, or, War”, in Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare, ed. by Madhavi Menon (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011), pp.404-413. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Hadorn, Peter T., “The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Problem of Chivalry”, Studies in Medievalism, 4 (1992), 45-57. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Harris, Jonathan Gil, “The Smell of Macbeth”, Shakespeare Quarterly, 58:4 (2007), 465-486. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Harris, Jonathan Gil, Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Harris, Jonathan Gil, Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Heng, Geraldine, Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Howard, Jean Elizabeth, “The New Historicism in Renaissance Studies”, English Literary Renaissance, 16:1 (1986), 13-43. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Howard, Jean Elizabethand Paul Strohm, “The Imaginary ‘Commons’”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 550-577. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Ingham, Patricia Clare, “Homosociality and Creative Masculinity in the Knight’s Tale”, in Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to Maleness in the ‘Canterbury Tales’ and ‘Troilus and Criseyde’, ed. by Peter G. Beidler (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1998), pp.23-55. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
James, Heather, Shakespeare’s Troy: Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (New York: Methuen, 1981). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Jameson, Fredric, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1991). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Jameson, Fredric, A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present (London, New York: Verso, 2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
John Lydgate: Poetry, Culture, and Lancastrian England, ed. by Larry Scanlon and James Simpson (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Johnston, Andrew James, “Wrestling with Ganymede: Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale and the Homoerotics of Epic History”, Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 50 (2000), 21-43. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Johnston, Andrew James, Performing the Middle Ages from ‘Beowulf’ to ‘Othello’ (Turnhout: Brepols, 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Johnston, Andrew James, “Sailing the Seas of Literary History: Gower, Chaucer, and the Problem of Incest in Shakespeare’s Pericles”, Poetica 41:3/4 (2009), 381-407. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Johnston, Andrew James, “Geschlechter-Lektüren: Emotion und Intimität in Chaucers Troilus and Criseyde”, in Machtvolle Gefühle, ed. by Ingrid Kasten (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010), pp.246-259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Johnston, Andrew James, “Subjectivity and the Ekphrastic Prerogative: Emilia’s Soliloquy in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Solo Performances: Staging the Early Modern Self in England, ed. by Ute Berns (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010), pp.49-65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Jones, Ann Rosalind and Peter Stallybrass, Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Keller, Wolfram, “Passionate Authorial Performances: From Chaucer’s Criseyde to Shakespeare’s Cressida”, unpublished paper presented at the conference Performing the Poetics of Passion: Chaucer’s ‘Troilus and Criseyde’ and Shakespeare’s ‘Troilus and Cressida’, Free University of Berlin, 13-15 May 2010. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Kindlers Neues Literaturlexikon, ed. by Jens Walter and others, 22 vols (Munich: Kindler, 1988-1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Kopytoff, Igor, “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process”, in The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, ed. by Arjun Appadurai (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp.64-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Kuskin, William, “Recursive Origins: Print History and Shakespeare’s 2 Henry VI” in Shakespeare and the Middle Ages, ed. by Curtis Perry and John Watkins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp.126-150. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Lacan, Jacques, “Some Reflections on the Ego”, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34:1 (1953), 11-17. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Lerer, Seth, Chaucer and His Readers: Imagining the Author in Late-Medieval England (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Lewis, Sarah, “Shakespeare, Time, Theory”, Literature Compass, 11:4 (2014), 246-257. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Loomba, Ania, “Periodization, Race, and Global Contact”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 595-620. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Lynch, Kathryn L., “The Three Noble Kinsmen: Chaucer, Shakespeare, Fletcher”, in Images of Matter: Essays on British Literature of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Proceedings of the Eighth Citadel Conference on Literature, Charleston, South Carolina, 2002, ed. by Yvonne Bruce (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005), pp.72-91. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Mallette, Richard, “Same-Sex Erotic Friendship in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Explorations in Renaissance Drama, ed. by Mary Beth Rose (Evanston: Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library Center for Renaissance Studies, 1997), p.29-52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Mallin, Eric Scott, “Emulous Factions and the Collapse of Chivalry: Troilus and Cressida”, in Inscribing the Time: Shakespeare and the End of Elizabethan England, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp.25-61. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Margherita, Gayle, “Historicity, Femininity, and Chaucer’s Troilus”, Exemplaria 6 (1995), pp.243-269. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Masten, Jeffrey, Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
McDonald, Russ, The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare: An Introduction with Documents (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Medievalism in the Modern World: Essays in Honour of Leslie Workman, ed. by Richard Utz and Tom Shippey (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Montrose, Louis Adrian, The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Muscatine, Charles, Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Orgel, Stephen, The Illusion of Power: Political Theater in the English Renaissance (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975, 1991). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Parker, Patricia, Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Partridge, Eric, Shakespeare’s Bawdy (New York, London: Routledge, 1947, 1968). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
The Past and Future of Medieval Studies, ed. by John Van Engen (Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press, 1994). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Patterson, Lee, Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Patterson, Lee, “On the Margin: Postmodernism, Ironic History, and Medieval Studies”, Speculum, 65 (1990), 87-108. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Patterson, Lee, Chaucer and the Subject of History (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Patterson, Lee, “The Return to Philology”, in The Past and Future of Medieval Studies, ed. by John Van Engen (Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), pp.231-244. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Paulys Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft: Neue Bearbeitung begonnen von Georg Wissowa, fortgeführt von Wilhelm Kroll und Karl Mittelhaus. Dreiundvierzigster Halbband, Pontarches bis Praefectianus, ed. by Konrat Ziegler (Stuttgart: Alfred Druckenmüller Verlag, 1953, 1970). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Pearsall, Derek, The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Pearson, D’Orsay W., “‘Unkinde’ Theseus: A Study in Renaissance Mythography”, English Literary Renaissance, 4:2 (1974), 276-298. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Potter, A. M., “‘Troilus and Cressida’: Deconstructing the Middle Ages?” Theoria, 72 (1988), 23-35. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Reading the Medieval in Early Modern England, ed. by Gordon McMullan and David Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Renaissance Medievalisms, ed. by Konrad Eisenbichler (Toronto: CRRS Publications, 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Rich, Adrienne, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence”, in Blood, Bread, and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979-1985 (London: Virago Press, 1980, 1986), pp. 23-75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Rogers, Jami, “Cressida in Twenty-First Century Performance”, Shakespeare, 10:1 (2014), 56-71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Rose, Mary Beth, The Expense of Spirit: Love and Sexuality in English Renaissance Drama (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Rubinstein, Frankie, A Dictionary of Shakespeare’s Sexual Puns and their Significance (London: Macmillan, 1984, 1989). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Rust, Martha Dana, “‘Le Vostre C’: Letters and Love in Bodleian Library MS Arch. Selden. B. 24”, in New Perspectives on Criseyde, ed. by Cindy L. Vitto and Marcia Smith Marzec (Asheville: Pegasus, 2004), pp.111-138. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Sanders, Julie, “Mixed Messages: The Aesthetics of The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume IV: The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays, ed. by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), pp.445-461. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Sanok, Catherine, “Criseyde, Cassandre, and the Thebaid: Women and the Theban Subtext of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 20 (1998), pp. 41-71. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Sexuality and Politics in Renaissance Drama, ed. by Carol Levin and Karen Robertson (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1991). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shakespeare and the Middle Ages, ed. by Curtis Perry and John Watkins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Shannon, Laurie, “Professing Friendship: Erotic Prerogatives and ‘Human Title’ in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Sovereign Amity: Figures of Friendship in Shakespearean Contexts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), pp.90-122. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Simpson, James, Reform and Cultural Revolution: The Oxford English Literary History, Volume 2. 1350-1547 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Sinfield, Alan, “Cultural Materialism and Intertextuality: The Limits of Queer Reading in A Midsummer Night’s Dream and The Two Noble Kinsmen”, Shakespeare Survey, 56 (2003), 67-78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Sinfield, Alan, “The Leather Men and the Lovely Boy: Reading Positions in Troilus and Cressida”, in Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare, ed. by Madhavi Menon (Durham, N.C. and London: Duke University Press, 2011), pp.376-384. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, “The Rani of Sirmur”, in Europe and its Others, Vol. 1: Proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature, July 1984, ed. by Francis Barker and others (Colchester: University of Essex, 1985), pp.128-151. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Stallybrass, Peter, “Worn Worlds: Clothes and Identity on the Renaissance Stage”, in Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, ed. by Margreta de Grazia, Maureen Quilligan and Peter Stallybrass (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.289-320. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Stock, Brian, “The Middle Ages as Subject and Object: Romantic Attitudes and Academic Medievalism”, New Literary History, 5 (1974), 527-547. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Stretter, Robert, “Flowers of Friendship: Amity and Tragic Desire in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, English Literary Renaissance, 47:2, (2017), 270-300. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Strohm, Paul, “Storie, Spelle, Geste, Romaunce, Tragedie: Generic Distinctions in the Middle English Troy Narratives”, in Speculum, 46 (1971), 348-359. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Strohm, Paul, Theory and the Premodern Text (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Strong, Roy, The Cult of Elizabeth: Elizabethan Portraiture and Pageantry (London: Thames and Hudson, 1987). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Summit, Jennifer and David Wallace, “Rethinking Periodization”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 447-451. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Summit, Jennifer, Memory’s Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Theatre and Religion: Lancastrian Shakespeare, ed. by Richard Dutton (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Thompson, Anne, Shakespeare’s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1978). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Traub, Valerie, The Renaissance of Lesbianism in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Wagoner, Michael M., “The Dramaturgical Space of Solo Scenes in Fletcher and Shakespeare, or a Study of the Jailer’s Daughter”, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35:1 (2017), 97-118. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
White, Hayden V., Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662
Yachnin, Paul, “Shakespeare’s Problem Plays and the Drama of His Time: Troilus and Cressida, All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure”, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume IV: The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays, ed. by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 2006), pp.46-68. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783956504662