The Stage as Palimpsest

Dr. Karoline Johanna Baumann

doi:10.5771/9783956504662

Zusammenfassung

Die Studie untersucht frühneuzeitliche Epochenkonzepte mit dem Ziel einer kritischen Hinterfragung des Selbstverständnisses der Neuzeit und der damit verbundenen, das Mittelalter marginalisierenden Periodisierungskonzepte. Sie zeigt, wie auf der frühneuzeitlichen Bühne Begriffe von Zeit und Zeitlichkeit durchgespielt werden, für die die Vorstellung von Linearität und Fortschrittsgeschichtsschreibung, die unseren Epochenbegriffen zugrunde liegt, zu kurz greift. Vielmehr legen beide Stücke, auf antiken Quellen basierend, aber sowohl im Mittelalter als auch in der Neuzeit vielfach umgeschrieben und neu interpretiert, einen palimpsestartigen Zeitbegriff nahe. Ein Palimpsest enthält verschiedene Zeitstufen nicht in sukzessiver oder chronologischer Anordnung, sondern unhierarchisch neben- und übereinandergelagert. So wird die Frage nach der Epochenkonstruktion bei Shakespeare performativ gestellt, mit besonderem Fokus auf der Erfindung des Mittelalters.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr: 2018
Erscheinungsdatum: 17.09.2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-95650-465-5
ISBN-Online: 978-3-95650-466-2
Verlag: Ergon, Baden-Baden
Reihe: Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Literaturwissenschaft
Band: 6
Sprache: Englisch
Seiten: 160
Produkttyp: Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff Seiten 1 - 6
Introduction Kein Zugriff Seiten 7 - 18
1. I.1. Troilus and Cressida as a medieval in(ter)vention Kein Zugriff
2. I.2. Polychronic text – the palimpsest Kein Zugriff
3. I.3. The medieval/early modern dichotomy Kein Zugriff
4. I.4. Troilus true and Cressida false? The performative power of discourse Kein Zugriff
1. II.1. The Prologue: “Constant to eternity” Kein Zugriff
2. II.2. “I carry winged time”: The Gower figure in Pericles Kein Zugriff
3. II.3. The funeral-marriage Kein Zugriff
4. II.4. “I am your heir and you are mine”: Figurations of Palamon and Arcite Kein Zugriff
5. II.5. ‘Thebanness’ and ‘Athenness’ Kein Zugriff
6. II.6. Polychronicity and Multitemporality Kein Zugriff
7. II.7. Theseus, Creon and the gods Kein Zugriff
8. II. 8. “Nat fully quyke, ne fully dede they were” Kein Zugriff
9. II.9. Compulsory heterosexual marriage and linear time Kein Zugriff
10. II.10. Pericles: Authorship, patriarchy, the “dynastic agenda” and linear time Kein Zugriff
11. II.11. The Great Mover’s Speech – Palamon and Arcite’s function for Theseus Kein Zugriff
12. II.12. Structural repetition Kein Zugriff
Conclusion Kein Zugriff Seiten 147 - 150
Bibliography Kein Zugriff Seiten 151 - 160

Literaturverzeichnis (157 Einträge)

PRIMARY SOURCES Google Scholar öffnen
Beaumont, Francis and John Fletcher, The Maid’s Tragedy, in English Renaissance Drama: A Norton Anthology, ed. by David Bevington and others (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2002), pp.1147-1214. Google Scholar öffnen
Caxton, William, The Recuyell of the Historyes of Troye, ed. by H. Oskar Sommer (New York: AMS Press, 1973). Google Scholar öffnen
Chapman’s Homer: The Iliad, ed. by Allardyce Nicoll (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
Fletcher, John and William Shakespeare, The Two Noble Kinsmen, ed. by Lois Potter, Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Thomson Learning, 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
Fletcher, John and William Shakespeare, The Two Noble Kinsmen, ed. by Eugene M. Waith, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Geoffrey Chaucer: Troilus and Criseyde with facing-page Il Filostrato, ed. by Stephen A. Barney (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
Gower, John, Confessio Amantis, ed. by Russell A. Peck (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968). Google Scholar öffnen
John Donne: Complete Poetry and Selected Prose, ed. by John Hayward (New York: Random House Inc., 1949). Google Scholar öffnen
The Holy Bible, Revised Standard Version: Containing the Old and New Testaments Translated from the Original Tongues, being the Version set forth A.D. 1611, revised A.D. 1881-1885 and A.D. 1901, Compared with the most Ancient Authorities and Revised A.D. 1946-1952 (New York: Meridian, 1974). Google Scholar öffnen
Homer, The Iliad, trans. and with an introduction by Richmond Lattimore (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951). Google Scholar öffnen
Homer, The Iliad, The Odyssey, trans. and with an introduction by Richmond Lattimore (New York: Harper, 1965, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
Horace, Ars Poetica, ed. with notes by Augustus S. Wilkins (London: Macmillan, 1939). Google Scholar öffnen
Lydgate, John, Troy Book, ed. by Henry Bergen (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1906-1935). Google Scholar öffnen
Ovid, Metamorphoses, ed. and trans. by Charles Martin (New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
Ovidius Naso, Publius, Metamorphoseon libri quindecim. Lateinisch/ Deutsch, ed. and trans. by Michael von Albrecht (Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam, 1994, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
Ovid’s Metamorphoses: The Arthur Golding Translation 1567, ed. by John Frederick Nims (New York: Macmillan, 1965). Google Scholar öffnen
The Riverside Chaucer, ed. by Larry D. Benson, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987). Google Scholar öffnen
Shakespeare, William, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, ed. by Peter Holland, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Shakespeare, William, Julius Caesar, ed. by David Daniell, The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Methuen, 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
Shakespeare, William, Pericles, ed. by Suzanne Gossett, The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Thomson Learning, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
Shakespeare, William, Romeo and Juliet, ed. by Jill L. Levenson, The Oxford Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
Shakespeare, William, Troilus and Cressida, ed. by David Bevington, The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series (London: Thomson Learning, 1998, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
Sophocles, Antigone, in Sophocles I: Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone, ed. by David Grene and Richmond Lattimore (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991), pp.159-212. Google Scholar öffnen
Statius, Publius Papinius, The Thebaid: Seven Against Thebes, trans. and with an introduction by Charles Stanley Ross (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
Virgil, The Aeneid, trans. by C. Day Lewis, with an introduction and notes by Jasper Griffin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Webster, John, The Duchess of Malfi, in English Renaissance Drama: A Norton Anthology, ed. by David Bevington and others (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2002), pp. 1749-1832. Google Scholar öffnen
William Shakespeare: Complete Works, ed. by Jonathan Bate and Eric Rasmussen, The RSC Shakespeare (London: Macmillan, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
William Shakespeare: The Complete Works, ed. by Stanley Wells and others, The Oxford Shakespeare, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
SECONDARY SOURCES Google Scholar öffnen
Abrams, Richard, “Gender Confusion and Sexual Politics in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Drama, Sex and Politics, Themes in Drama 7, ed. by James Redmond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp.69-76. Google Scholar öffnen
Aers, David, “A Whisper in the Ear of Early Modernists; or, Reflections on Literary Critics Writing the ‘History of the Subject’”, in Culture and History 1350-1600: Essays on English Communities, Identities and Writing, ed. by David Aers (New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992), pp.177-202. Google Scholar öffnen
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths and Helen Tiffin, Key Concepts in Post-Colonial Studies (New York, London: Routledge, 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
Barr, Helen, “‘Wrinkled deep in time’: Emily and Arcite in A Midsummer Night’s Dream”, in Transporting Chaucer (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2014), 140-165. Google Scholar öffnen
Baudelaire, Charles, Artificial Paradises, trans. by Stacy Diamond (New York: Citadel Press, 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
Benjamin, Walter, Illuminations, trans. by Harry Zohn, ed. and with an introduction by Hannah Arendt (New York: Schocken Books, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
Benjamin, Walter, Über den Begriff der Geschichte, ed. by Gérard Raulet (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
Berns, Ute, “Interioritätskonstruktionen und Freundschaftsdiskurs bei Shakespeare”, Shakespeare Jahrbuch 144 (2008), pp. 148-167. Google Scholar öffnen
Bethke, Kathrin, “Nothings monstered”: Economies of Pride in ‘Coriolanus’ and ‘Troilus and Cressida’, unpublished paper held at the Shakespeare Association of America’s 40th Annual Convention, Boston, 6 April 2012. Google Scholar öffnen
Bhabha, Homi K., “DissemiNation: Time, Narrative, and the Margins of the Modern Nation”, in Bhabha, The Location of Culture (New York, London: Routledge, 1994), pp.199-244. Google Scholar öffnen
Biddick, Kathleen, The Typological Imaginary: History, Technology, Circumcision (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
Bradbrook, M.C., “What Shakespeare Did to Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde”, Shakespeare Quarterly, 9:3 (1958), pp.311-319. Google Scholar öffnen
Braden, Gordon, “Shakespeare’s Roman Tragedies”, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume I: The Tragedies, ed. by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 2006), pp.199-218. Google Scholar öffnen
Briggs, Julia Ruth, “‘Chaucer … the Story Gives:’ Troilus and Cressida and The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in: Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Settings, ed. by Martha W. Driver and Sid Ray (Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland & Company, 2009), pp.161-177. Google Scholar öffnen
Burckhardt, Jacob, The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy, trans. by S.G.C. Middlemore, Introduction by Benjamin Nelson and Charles Trinkaus (New York: Harper, 1958). Google Scholar öffnen
Butler, Judith, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” (New York, London: Routledge, 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
Butler, Judith, Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative (New York, London: Routledge, 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
Cantor, Norman F., The Last Knight: The Twilight of the Middle Ages and the Birth of the Modern Era (New York: Free Press, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
Carney, Jo Eldridge, “The Ambiguities of Love and War in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Sexuality and Politics in Renaissance Drama. Studies in Renaissance Literature Vol. 10, ed. by Carole Levin and Karen Robertson (Lewiston, N.Y.: Edwin Mellen Press, 1991), pp.95-111. Google Scholar öffnen
Caxton’s Trace: Studies in the History of English Printing, ed. by William Kuskin (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
Certeau, Michel de, Heterologies: Discourse on the Other, trans. by Brian Massumi, foreword by Wlad Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986, 1995). Google Scholar öffnen
Certeau, Michel de, The Writing of History, trans. by Tom Conley (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
The Challenge of Periodization: Old Paradigms and New Perspectives, ed. by Lawrence Besserman (New York: Garland, 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
Cheney, Patrick, Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, “Introduction: Midcolonial”, in The Postcolonial Middle Ages, ed. by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen (London: Macmillan Press, 2000), pp.1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome, Medieval Identity Machines. Medieval Cultures 35 (Minneapolis/ London: University of Minnesota Press, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
Cook, Carol, “Unbodied Figures of Desire”, Theatre Journal 38:1: Dramatic Narration, Theatrical Disruption (1986), 34-52. Google Scholar öffnen
Cooper, Helen, The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). Google Scholar öffnen
Crocker, Holly, “‘As False as Cressid’: Virtue Trouble from Chaucer to Shakespeare”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 43:2 (2013), 303-334. Google Scholar öffnen
Cultural Reformations: Medieval and Renaissance in Literary History, ed. by James Simpson and Brian Cummings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
Dagenais, John and Margaret R. Greer, “Decolonizing the Middle Ages: Introduction”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 30:3 (2000), 431-448. Google Scholar öffnen
Davis, Alex, “Living in the Past: Thebes, Periodization, and The Two Noble Kinsmen”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 40:1 (2010), 173-195. Google Scholar öffnen
Davis, Kathleen, “National Writing in the Ninth Century: A Reminder for Postcolonial Thinking about the Nation”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 28:3 (1998), 611-637. Google Scholar öffnen
Davis, Kathleen, Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Dinshaw, Carolyn, Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989). Google Scholar öffnen
Donaldson, Ethelbert Talbot, The Swan at the Well: Shakespeare Reading Chaucer (New Haven, Ct.: Yale University Press, 1985). Google Scholar öffnen
Driver, Martha W. and Sid Ray, Shakespeare and the Middle Ages: Essays on the Performance and Adaptation of the Plays with Medieval Sources or Settings (Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
Elton, William R., Shakespeare’s ‘Troilus and Cressida’ and the Inns of Court Revels (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
Ferguson, Margaret W., “Feathers and Flies: Aphra Behn and the Seventeenth-Century Trade in Exotica”, in Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, ed. by Margreta de Grazia, Maureen Quilligan and Peter Stallybrass (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.235-259. Google Scholar öffnen
Ferguson, Wallace K., The Renaissance in Historical Thought. Five Centuries of Interpretation (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1948). Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, Michel, The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Vintage Books, 1972, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
Foucault, Michel, The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction (New York: Vintage Books, 1978, 1990). Google Scholar öffnen
Fumerton, Patricia, “Introduction: A New New Historicism”, in Renaissance Culture and the Everyday, ed. by Patricia Fumerton and Simon Hunt (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), pp.1-17. Google Scholar öffnen
The Future of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Problems, Trends, and Opportunities for Research, ed. by Roger Dahood (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
Ganim, John M., Medievalism and Orientalism: Three Essays on Literature, Architecture and Cultural Identity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). Google Scholar öffnen
Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973). Google Scholar öffnen
Genette, Gérard, Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Press, 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
de Grazia, Margreta, “The Modern Divide: From Either Side”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 453-467. Google Scholar öffnen
Greene, Jody, “The Two Noble Kinsmen: Philadelphia, or, War”, in Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare, ed. by Madhavi Menon (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011), pp.404-413. Google Scholar öffnen
Hadorn, Peter T., “The Two Noble Kinsmen and the Problem of Chivalry”, Studies in Medievalism, 4 (1992), 45-57. Google Scholar öffnen
Harris, Jonathan Gil, “The Smell of Macbeth”, Shakespeare Quarterly, 58:4 (2007), 465-486. Google Scholar öffnen
Harris, Jonathan Gil, Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
Harris, Jonathan Gil, Shakespeare and Literary Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). Google Scholar öffnen
Heng, Geraldine, Empire of Magic: Medieval Romance and the Politics of Cultural Fantasy (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
Howard, Jean Elizabeth, “The New Historicism in Renaissance Studies”, English Literary Renaissance, 16:1 (1986), 13-43. Google Scholar öffnen
Howard, Jean Elizabethand Paul Strohm, “The Imaginary ‘Commons’”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 550-577. Google Scholar öffnen
Ingham, Patricia Clare, “Homosociality and Creative Masculinity in the Knight’s Tale”, in Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to Maleness in the ‘Canterbury Tales’ and ‘Troilus and Criseyde’, ed. by Peter G. Beidler (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1998), pp.23-55. Google Scholar öffnen
James, Heather, Shakespeare’s Troy: Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (New York: Methuen, 1981). Google Scholar öffnen
Jameson, Fredric, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
Jameson, Fredric, A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present (London, New York: Verso, 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
John Lydgate: Poetry, Culture, and Lancastrian England, ed. by Larry Scanlon and James Simpson (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2006). Google Scholar öffnen
Johnston, Andrew James, “Wrestling with Ganymede: Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale and the Homoerotics of Epic History”, Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift, 50 (2000), 21-43. Google Scholar öffnen
Johnston, Andrew James, Performing the Middle Ages from ‘Beowulf’ to ‘Othello’ (Turnhout: Brepols, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
Johnston, Andrew James, “Sailing the Seas of Literary History: Gower, Chaucer, and the Problem of Incest in Shakespeare’s Pericles”, Poetica 41:3/4 (2009), 381-407. Google Scholar öffnen
Johnston, Andrew James, “Geschlechter-Lektüren: Emotion und Intimität in Chaucers Troilus and Criseyde”, in Machtvolle Gefühle, ed. by Ingrid Kasten (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2010), pp.246-259. Google Scholar öffnen
Johnston, Andrew James, “Subjectivity and the Ekphrastic Prerogative: Emilia’s Soliloquy in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Solo Performances: Staging the Early Modern Self in England, ed. by Ute Berns (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010), pp.49-65. Google Scholar öffnen
Jones, Ann Rosalind and Peter Stallybrass, Renaissance Clothing and the Materials of Memory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
Keller, Wolfram, “Passionate Authorial Performances: From Chaucer’s Criseyde to Shakespeare’s Cressida”, unpublished paper presented at the conference Performing the Poetics of Passion: Chaucer’s ‘Troilus and Criseyde’ and Shakespeare’s ‘Troilus and Cressida’, Free University of Berlin, 13-15 May 2010. Google Scholar öffnen
Kindlers Neues Literaturlexikon, ed. by Jens Walter and others, 22 vols (Munich: Kindler, 1988-1998). Google Scholar öffnen
Kopytoff, Igor, “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process”, in The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, ed. by Arjun Appadurai (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), pp.64-91. Google Scholar öffnen
Kuskin, William, “Recursive Origins: Print History and Shakespeare’s 2 Henry VI” in Shakespeare and the Middle Ages, ed. by Curtis Perry and John Watkins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp.126-150. Google Scholar öffnen
Lacan, Jacques, “Some Reflections on the Ego”, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34:1 (1953), 11-17. Google Scholar öffnen
Lerer, Seth, Chaucer and His Readers: Imagining the Author in Late-Medieval England (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993). Google Scholar öffnen
Lewis, Sarah, “Shakespeare, Time, Theory”, Literature Compass, 11:4 (2014), 246-257. Google Scholar öffnen
Loomba, Ania, “Periodization, Race, and Global Contact”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 595-620. Google Scholar öffnen
Lynch, Kathryn L., “The Three Noble Kinsmen: Chaucer, Shakespeare, Fletcher”, in Images of Matter: Essays on British Literature of the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Proceedings of the Eighth Citadel Conference on Literature, Charleston, South Carolina, 2002, ed. by Yvonne Bruce (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005), pp.72-91. Google Scholar öffnen
Mallette, Richard, “Same-Sex Erotic Friendship in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Explorations in Renaissance Drama, ed. by Mary Beth Rose (Evanston: Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library Center for Renaissance Studies, 1997), p.29-52. Google Scholar öffnen
Mallin, Eric Scott, “Emulous Factions and the Collapse of Chivalry: Troilus and Cressida”, in Inscribing the Time: Shakespeare and the End of Elizabethan England, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995), pp.25-61. Google Scholar öffnen
Margherita, Gayle, “Historicity, Femininity, and Chaucer’s Troilus”, Exemplaria 6 (1995), pp.243-269. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1179/exm.1994.6.2.243
Masten, Jeffrey, Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexualities in Renaissance Drama (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997). Google Scholar öffnen
McDonald, Russ, The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare: An Introduction with Documents (Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2001). Google Scholar öffnen
Medievalism in the Modern World: Essays in Honour of Leslie Workman, ed. by Richard Utz and Tom Shippey (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998). Google Scholar öffnen
Montrose, Louis Adrian, The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
Muscatine, Charles, Chaucer and the French Tradition: A Study in Style and Meaning (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957). Google Scholar öffnen
Orgel, Stephen, The Illusion of Power: Political Theater in the English Renaissance (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
Parker, Patricia, Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996). Google Scholar öffnen
Partridge, Eric, Shakespeare’s Bawdy (New York, London: Routledge, 1947, 1968). Google Scholar öffnen
The Past and Future of Medieval Studies, ed. by John Van Engen (Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press, 1994). Google Scholar öffnen
Patterson, Lee, Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1987). Google Scholar öffnen
Patterson, Lee, “On the Margin: Postmodernism, Ironic History, and Medieval Studies”, Speculum, 65 (1990), 87-108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2864473
Patterson, Lee, Chaucer and the Subject of History (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
Patterson, Lee, “The Return to Philology”, in The Past and Future of Medieval Studies, ed. by John Van Engen (Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press, 1994), pp.231-244. Google Scholar öffnen
Paulys Realencyclopädie der Classischen Altertumswissenschaft: Neue Bearbeitung begonnen von Georg Wissowa, fortgeführt von Wilhelm Kroll und Karl Mittelhaus. Dreiundvierzigster Halbband, Pontarches bis Praefectianus, ed. by Konrat Ziegler (Stuttgart: Alfred Druckenmüller Verlag, 1953, 1970). Google Scholar öffnen
Pearsall, Derek, The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992). Google Scholar öffnen
Pearson, D’Orsay W., “‘Unkinde’ Theseus: A Study in Renaissance Mythography”, English Literary Renaissance, 4:2 (1974), 276-298. Google Scholar öffnen
Potter, A. M., “‘Troilus and Cressida’: Deconstructing the Middle Ages?” Theoria, 72 (1988), 23-35. Google Scholar öffnen
Reading the Medieval in Early Modern England, ed. by Gordon McMullan and David Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). Google Scholar öffnen
Renaissance Medievalisms, ed. by Konrad Eisenbichler (Toronto: CRRS Publications, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
Rich, Adrienne, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence”, in Blood, Bread, and Poetry: Selected Prose 1979-1985 (London: Virago Press, 1980, 1986), pp. 23-75. Google Scholar öffnen
Rogers, Jami, “Cressida in Twenty-First Century Performance”, Shakespeare, 10:1 (2014), 56-71. Google Scholar öffnen
Rose, Mary Beth, The Expense of Spirit: Love and Sexuality in English Renaissance Drama (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988). Google Scholar öffnen
Rubinstein, Frankie, A Dictionary of Shakespeare’s Sexual Puns and their Significance (London: Macmillan, 1984, 1989). Google Scholar öffnen
Rust, Martha Dana, “‘Le Vostre C’: Letters and Love in Bodleian Library MS Arch. Selden. B. 24”, in New Perspectives on Criseyde, ed. by Cindy L. Vitto and Marcia Smith Marzec (Asheville: Pegasus, 2004), pp.111-138. Google Scholar öffnen
Sanders, Julie, “Mixed Messages: The Aesthetics of The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume IV: The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays, ed. by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), pp.445-461. Google Scholar öffnen
Sanok, Catherine, “Criseyde, Cassandre, and the Thebaid: Women and the Theban Subtext of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, Studies in the Age of Chaucer, 20 (1998), pp. 41-71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.1353/sac.1998.0001
Sexuality and Politics in Renaissance Drama, ed. by Carol Levin and Karen Robertson (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1991). Google Scholar öffnen
Shakespeare and the Middle Ages, ed. by Curtis Perry and John Watkins (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
Shannon, Laurie, “Professing Friendship: Erotic Prerogatives and ‘Human Title’ in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, in Sovereign Amity: Figures of Friendship in Shakespearean Contexts (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), pp.90-122. Google Scholar öffnen
Simpson, James, Reform and Cultural Revolution: The Oxford English Literary History, Volume 2. 1350-1547 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
Sinfield, Alan, “Cultural Materialism and Intertextuality: The Limits of Queer Reading in A Midsummer Night’s Dream and The Two Noble Kinsmen”, Shakespeare Survey, 56 (2003), 67-78. Google Scholar öffnen
Sinfield, Alan, “The Leather Men and the Lovely Boy: Reading Positions in Troilus and Cressida”, in Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare, ed. by Madhavi Menon (Durham, N.C. and London: Duke University Press, 2011), pp.376-384. Google Scholar öffnen
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, “The Rani of Sirmur”, in Europe and its Others, Vol. 1: Proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature, July 1984, ed. by Francis Barker and others (Colchester: University of Essex, 1985), pp.128-151. Google Scholar öffnen
Stallybrass, Peter, “Worn Worlds: Clothes and Identity on the Renaissance Stage”, in Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture, ed. by Margreta de Grazia, Maureen Quilligan and Peter Stallybrass (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp.289-320. Google Scholar öffnen
Stock, Brian, “The Middle Ages as Subject and Object: Romantic Attitudes and Academic Medievalism”, New Literary History, 5 (1974), 527-547. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/468359
Stretter, Robert, “Flowers of Friendship: Amity and Tragic Desire in The Two Noble Kinsmen”, English Literary Renaissance, 47:2, (2017), 270-300. Google Scholar öffnen
Strohm, Paul, “Storie, Spelle, Geste, Romaunce, Tragedie: Generic Distinctions in the Middle English Troy Narratives”, in Speculum, 46 (1971), 348-359. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.2307/2854860
Strohm, Paul, Theory and the Premodern Text (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000). Google Scholar öffnen
Strong, Roy, The Cult of Elizabeth: Elizabethan Portraiture and Pageantry (London: Thames and Hudson, 1987). Google Scholar öffnen
Summit, Jennifer and David Wallace, “Rethinking Periodization”, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 37:3 (2007), 447-451. Google Scholar öffnen
Summit, Jennifer, Memory’s Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008). Google Scholar öffnen
Theatre and Religion: Lancastrian Shakespeare, ed. by Richard Dutton (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003). Google Scholar öffnen
Thompson, Anne, Shakespeare’s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1978). Google Scholar öffnen
Traub, Valerie, The Renaissance of Lesbianism in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002). Google Scholar öffnen
Wagoner, Michael M., “The Dramaturgical Space of Solo Scenes in Fletcher and Shakespeare, or a Study of the Jailer’s Daughter”, Shakespeare Bulletin, 35:1 (2017), 97-118. Google Scholar öffnen
White, Hayden V., Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978). Google Scholar öffnen
Yachnin, Paul, “Shakespeare’s Problem Plays and the Drama of His Time: Troilus and Cressida, All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure”, in A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Volume IV: The Poems, Problem Comedies, Late Plays, ed. by Richard Dutton and Jean E. Howard (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, 2006), pp.46-68. Google Scholar öffnen