Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 24 (2021), Edition 3
Volume Open Access Full access

Volume 24 (2021), Edition 3

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Authors:
Journal:
ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Publisher:
 2021

Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print
1435-439X
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
German
Product type
Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 24 (2021), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 387 - 388
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2021
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 24 (2021), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 389 - 436
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2021
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 24 (2021), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 437 - 484
The Investment Chapter of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) can be seen as an unofficial blueprint of future EU Investment Agreements and Chapters. It was developed under immense public pressure and had to fulfil multiple...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2021
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 24 (2021), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 485 - 511
Before the Covid-19 pandemic hit, the scheduled passenger air transport sector was already subject to several horizontal concentrations. The mix of free competition and strict regularization in the air transport sector in the EU raises the question...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2021
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)

Bibliography (88)

  1. REINISCH, AUGUST, The EU on the Investment Path – Quo Vadis Europe? The Future of EU BITs and other Investment Agreements, Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 2013, Vol. 12, pp. 111–157 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  2. SHIHATA, IBRAHIM, Towards a Greater Depoliticization of Investment Disputes: The Roles of ICSID and MIGA, ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 1986, Vol. 1(1), pp. 2–35 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  3. SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2005, Vol. 6(3), pp. 357–386 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  4. SCHILL, STEPHAN, Do Investment Treaties Chill Unilateral State Regulation to Mitigate Climate Change?, Journal of International Arbitration, 2007, Vol. 24(5), pp. 469–477 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  5. SCHÄFER, JAN, Investitionsschutzklausel in Freihandelsabkommen zwischen USA und EU?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 2014, Vol. 47(5), p. 154 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  6. SCHACHERER, STEFANIE, TPP, CETA and TTIP Between Innovation and Consolidation—Resolving Investor–State Disputes under Mega-regionals, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2016, Vol. 7(3), pp. 628–653 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  7. SAUVANT, KARL; CHISWICK-PATTERSON, MICHAEL (eds.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes, Oxford, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  8. RITTBERGER, BERTHOLD, Building Europe’s Parliament, Oxford, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  9. RIFFEL, CHRISTIAN, The CETA Opinion of the European Court of Justice and its Implications – Not that Selfish After All, Journal of International Economic Law, 2019, Vol. 22(3), pp. 503–521 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  10. REINISCH, AUGUST (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  11. REINISCH, AUGUST, The Division of Powers between the EU and its Member States ‘after Lisbon’, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Griebel, Jörn; Hindelang, Steffen (eds.), Internationaler Investitionsschutz und Europarecht, Baden-Baden, 2010, pp. 99–111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  12. TIENHAARA, KYLA, Regulatory chill and the threat of arbitration: A view from political science, in: Brown, Chester; Miles, Kate (eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge, 2011, pp. 606–628 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  13. REINISCH, AUGUST, Putting the Pieces Together … an EU Model BIT?, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2014, Vol. 15(3–4), pp. 679–704 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  14. REINISCH, AUGUST, From a “Salini-light” Test and New Disagreement on Waiting Periods to Clarifications on Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment – ICSID Arbitration in 2013, in: Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana (ed.), The Global Community. Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2014: Volume II, Oxford Scholarship Online, 2015, pp. 837 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  15. REINISCH, AUGUST, Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards? — The Limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19(4), pp. 761–786 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  16. PERNICE, INGOLF, Politisierung der EU nach der Europawahl – Politik zwischen TTIP und TTU, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2014, Vol. 25(14), pp. 521–522 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  17. PAHIS, STRATOS, Corruption in Our Courts: What It Looks Like and Where It Is Hidden, Yale Law Journal, 2009, Vol. 118(8), pp. 1900–1943 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  18. NEUMAYER, ERIC, Do Countries Fail to Raise Environmental Standards? An Evaluation of Policy Options Addressing ‘Regulatory Chill’, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2001, Vol. 4(3), pp. 231–244 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  19. MUCHLINSKI, PETER; ORTINO, FEDERICO; SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law, Oxford, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  20. MASING, JOHANNES, Die Mobilisierung des Bürgers für die Durchsetzung des Rechts Berlin, 1997 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  21. LIU, CHEOL; MIKESELL, JOHN, The Impact of Public Officials’ Corruption on the Size and Allocation of US State Spending, Public Administration Review, 2014, Vol. 74(3), pp. 346–359 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  22. LÉVESQUE, CÉLINE; NEWCOMBE, ANDREW, Canada, in: Brown, Chester (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties, Oxford, 2013, pp. 53–130 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  23. GILO, DAVID; SIMONELLI, FELICE, The Price-Increasing Effects of Domestic Code-Sharing Agreements for Non-Stop Airline Routes, J.C.L. & E., 2014, Vol. 11(1), pp. 69 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  24. VARSAMOS, STAMATIS, Single till V. Dual till and the Paradox of Airport Competition, Air & Space L., 2019, Vol. 44(4/5), pp. 40 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  25. VAN HOUTTE, BEN, Relevant Markets in Air Transport, C.M.L.R., 1990, Vol. 27, pp. 521 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  26. STROM, MARTIN, European Union Competition Law Developments in the Aviation Sector: July to December 2019, Air & Space L., 2020, Vol. 45(2), pp. 103 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  27. SHARMA, SIDHANT, To What Extent Has the Self-Assessment Principle, Introduced in Regulation 1/2003, Affected, Whether Positively or Nega-tively, the Undertakings in Air Transport Sector in the European Union?, Air & Space L., 2016, Vol. 41(4/5), pp. 345 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  28. RABINOVICI, ITAI, The Application of EU Competition Rules in the Transport Sector, J.E.C.L. & Pract., 2018, Vol. 9(4), pp. 282 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  29. MOHAN, MANU, Ray of Hope of Airline Alliances: Consideration of Out of Market Efficiencies by the European Commission, Air & Space L., 2014, Vol. 39(2), pp. 155 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  30. LYKOTRAFITI, ANTIGONI, A Comprehensive Study of Air Transport Liberali-zation Through the Lens of Strategic Airline Alliance, Air & Space L., 2019, Vol. 44(4/5), pp. 347 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  31. LEANDRO, SOLANGE, The Tale of the Airfreight Cartel Case, Air & Space L., 2020, Vol. 45(2), pp. 201 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  32. IVÁN, LÁSZLÓ ARNOLD, European Air Traffic Management from a New Perspective: Competition Concerns in the Single European Sky, Air & Space L., 2018, Vol. 43(3), pp. 319 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  33. HARRIS, HH. STEPHEN JR.; KRIBAN, ELISE, Antitrust Implications of Inter-national Code-sharing Alliances, Air & Space L., 1998, Vol. 23(4/5), pp. 166 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  34. LENAERTS, KOEN, The autonomy of European Law, I Post di Aisdue, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  35. CALZARETTA, ROBERT J.; EILAT, YAIR; ISRAEL, MARK A., Competitive Ef-fects of International Airline Cooperation, J.C.L. & E., 2017, Vol. 13(3), pp. 501 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  36. BRUECKNER, JAN K.; LEE, DARIN N.; SINGER, ETHAN S., Alliances, Codesharing, Antitrust Immunity, and International Airfares: Do Previous Patterns Persist?, J.C.L. & E., 2011, Vol. 7(3), pp. 573 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  37. BILOTKACH, VOLODYMYR; HÜSCHELRATH, KAI, Antitrust Immunity for Airline Alliances, J.C.L. & E., 2011, Vol. 7(2), pp. 335 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-485
  38. WILSKE, STEPHAN; RAWAL, RAEESA; SHARMA, GEETANJALI, The Emperor’s New Clothes: Should India Marvel at the EU’s New Proposed Investment Court System?, Indian Journal of Arbitration, 2018, Vol. 6(2), pp. 79–97 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  39. VAN DUZER, ANTHONY, Investor-State Dispute Settlement in CETA: Is It the Gold Standard?, Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2016-44, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  40. VANDEVELDE, KENNETH, Bilateral Investment Treaties, Oxford, 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  41. USYNIN, MAXIM; SZILÁRD, GÁSPÁR-SZILÁGYI, The Growing Tendency of Including Investment Chapters in PTAs, in: Amtenbrink, Fabian; Denise, Prévost; Wessel, Ramses (eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2017, The Hague, pp. 267–304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  42. TRAKMAN, LEON; RANIERI, NICOLA, Regionalism in International Investment Law, Oxford, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  43. TITI, CATHARINE, International investment law and the European Union: Towards a New Generation of International Investment Agreements, European Journal of International Law, 2015, Vol. 26(3), pp. 639–661 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  44. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN, Die Außenwirtschaftsverfassung der EU nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon, Beiträge zum transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, 2009, Issue 83 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  45. WEISS, WOLFGANG, Die Integrationsverantwortung der Verfassungsor-gane, Juristische Schulung, 2018, Jahrgang 58, S. 1046–1050 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  46. BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST, Von bilateralen Schieds- und Investitionsgerichten zum multilateralen Investitionsgerichtshof, Baden-Baden, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  47. BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST, From Arbitral Tribunals to a Multilateral Investment Court : The European Union Approach, in: Chaisse, Julien; Choukroune, Laila; Jusoh, Sufian (eds.), Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy, Singapore, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  48. BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST, From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, 2nd ed., Berlin, 2020 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  49. BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST, Draft Statute of the Multilateral Investment Court, Baden-Baden, 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  50. BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST (eds.), CETA Investment Law. Article-by-Article Commentary, Baden-Baden/Oxford, 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  51. BJORKLUND, ANDREA, National Treatment, in Reinisch, August (ed.), Standards of Investment Protection, Oxford, 2009, pp. 29–58 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  52. BERNASCONI-OSTERWALDER, NATHALIE; MANN, HOWARD, CETA and Investment: What Is It About and What Lies Beyond?, in: Mbengue, Makane Moïse; Schacherer, Stefanie (eds.), Foreign Investment Under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), Cham, 2019, pp. 339–361 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  53. BAETENS, FREYA, Discrimination on the Basis of Nationality: Determining Likeness in Human Rights and Investment Law, in: Schill, Stephan (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford, 2010, pp. 279–316 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  54. ANTONIETTI, AURÉLIA, The 2006 Amendments to the ICSID Rules and Regulations and the Additional Facility Rules, 21 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 2016, Vol. 21(2), pp. 427–448 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  55. WOUTERS, JAN/HOFFMEISTER, FRANK, u.a., The Law of EU External Rela-tions – Cases, Materials and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor, 3. Aufl., Oxford, 2021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  56. BUNGENBERG, MARC, The Common Commercial Policy, Parliamentary Participation and the Singapore Opinion of the CJEU, ZEuS, 2017, Vol. 20(4), pp. 383–396 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  57. WALDHOFF, CHRISTIAN, Art. 110 AEUV; 325 AEUV, in: Calliess, Christi-an/Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV Verfassungsrecht der Europäi-schen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechte Charta, 5. Aufl., München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  58. RUFFERT, MATTHIAS, Art. 329 AEUV, in: Calliess, Christian/Ruffert, Matthias, (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechte Charta, 5. Aufl., München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  59. RUFFERT, MATTHIAS, An den Grenzen des Integrationsverfassungsrechts: Das Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zum Vertrag von Lissabon, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt, 2009, S. 1197–1207 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  60. OHLER, CHRISTOPH, Artikel 48, in: Grabitz, Eberhard/Hilf, Meinhard (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, EL 62, München, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  61. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK, The European Union as an International Trade Negotiator, in: Koops, Joachim/Macaj, Gjovalin (Hrsg.), The European Union as a Diplomatic Actor, London, 2015, S. 138–154 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  62. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK, Die Außenvertretung der Europäischen Union im Lichte von acht Jahren Erfahrung mit dem Lissabon-Vertrag: wer ist heut-zutage der europäische Außenminister?, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 2017, Jahrgang 20, S. 451–492 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  63. ENGELS, ANDREAS, Die Integrationsverantwortung des Bundestags, Juris-tische Schulung, 2012, Jahrgang 52, S. 210–214 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  64. CREMER, HANS-JOACHIM, Art. 31 EUV, in: Calliess, Christian/Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechte Charta, 5. Aufl., München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  65. CALLIESS, CHRISTIAN, 70 Jahre Grundgesetz und europäische Integration: „Take back control“ oder „Mehr Demokratie wagen?“, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, 2019, Jahrgang 38, S. 684–692 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  66. CALLIESS, CHRISTIAN, Art. 192 AEUV; Art. 194 AEUV, in: Calliess, Christi-an/Ruffert, Matthias (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV Verfassungsrecht der Europäi-schen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechte Charta, 5. Aufl., München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  67. GAFFNEY, JOHN; AKÇAY, ZEYNEP, European Bilateral Approaches, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Griebel, Jörn; Hobe, Stephan; Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  68. KLÄGER, ROLAND, Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law, Cambridge, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  69. KELLOGG, PAUL, NAFTA unplugged?: Canada’s three economies and free trade with the EU, in: Hübner, Kurt (ed.), Europe, Canada and the Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement, Abingdon, 2011, pp. 107 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  70. JUDGE, DAVID; EARNSHAW, DAVID, The European Parliament, 2nd ed., London, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  71. HOWSE, ROB, Designing a Multilateral Investment Court: Issues and Options, Yearbook of European Law, 2017, Vol. 36, pp. 209–236 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  72. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK; ÜNÜVAR, GÜNES, From BITS and Pieces towards European Investment Agreements, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Reinisch, August; Tietje, Christian (eds.), EU and Investment Agreements, Baden-Baden, 2013, pp. 57–86 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  73. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK; ALEXANDRU, GABRIELA, A First Glimpse of Light on the Emerging Invisible EU Model BIT, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2014, Vol. 15(3–4), pp. 379–401 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  74. HOFFMEISTER, FRANK, Aktuelle Rechtsfragen in der Praxis der europäischen Außenhandelspolitik, ZEuS, 2013, Vol. 16(4), pp. 385–402 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  75. HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH; MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL Die Entwicklung des europäischen Außenwirtschaftsrechts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2016, Vol. 27(17), pp. 646–680 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  76. HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Die Zukunft der mitgliedstaatlichen Investitionspolitik nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2010, Vol. 21(6), pp. 201–240 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  77. HAPP, RICHARD; WUSCHKA, SEBASTIAN, From the Jay Treaty Commissions Towards a Multilateral Investment Court: Addressing the Enforcement Dilemma, Indian Journal of Arbitration, 2017, Vol. 6(1), pp. 113–132 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  78. BÖTTNER, ROBERT, Brückenklauseln im Europäischen Verfassungsrecht, Europarecht, 2017, Jahrgang 52, S. 381–400 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-389
  79. DOLZER, RUDOLF; SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH, Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd ed., Oxford, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  80. DIMOPOULOS, ANGELOS, EU Foreign Investment Law, Oxford, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  81. CRAIG, PAUL; DE BÚRCA, GRÁINNE, EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  82. CORBETT, RICHARD; JACOBS, FRANCIS; SHACKLETON, MICHAEL, The European Parliament, 8th ed., New York, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  83. CALAMITA, JANSEN, The (In)Compatibility of Appellate Mechanisms with Existing Instruments of the Investment Treaty Regime, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2017, Vol. 18(4), pp. 585–627 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  84. BUNGENBERG, MARC, Internationaler Investitionsschutz im Wettbewerb der Systeme, KSzW, 2011, pp. 116–120 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  85. BUNGENBERG, MARC, Going Global? The EU Common Commercial Policy After Lisbon, in: Herrmann, Christoph; Terhechte, Jörg Phillip (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2010, Cham, 2010, pp. 123–152 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  86. BUNGENBERG, MARC, Europäischer Internationaler Investitionsschutz, in: von Arnauld, Andreas (ed.), Europäische Außenbeziehungen, EnzEuR Vol. 10, Baden-Baden, 2014, pp. 743–768 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  87. BUNGENBERG, MARC, The Scope of Application of EU (Model) Investment Agreements, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 2014, Vol. 15(3–4), pp. 402–421 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437
  88. BUNGENBERG, MARC; GRIEBEL, JÖRN; HOBE, STEPHAN; REINISCH, AUGUST (eds.), International Investment Law – A Handbook, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2021-3-437

Latest issues

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
See all issues
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 28 (2025), Edition 4
Volume Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Volume 28 (2025), Edition 4
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 28 (2025), Edition 3
Volume Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Volume 28 (2025), Edition 3
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 28 (2025), Edition 2
Volume Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Volume 28 (2025), Edition 2
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 28 (2025), Edition 1
Volume Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Volume 28 (2025), Edition 1
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 27 (2024), Edition 4
Volume Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Volume 27 (2024), Edition 4

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS

Send suggestion