, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Europe bottom-up

How Eastern Germans and Poles frame the European Union
Authors:
Publisher:
 2012

Summary

Wie wird die EU von ihren Bürgern beurteilt? Diese Frage wird in den Sozialwissenschaften üblicherweise anhand von Umfragedaten untersucht. Der Band knüpft demgegenüber an qualitative EU-Studien an und analysiert aus konstruktivistischer Perspektive mit dem Framing-Ansatz die Wechselwirkung zwischen nationalen Diskursen und individuellen EU-Wahrnehmungen. Dies geschieht auf Grundlage von halbstandardisierten Interviews mit Gesprächspartnern aus verschiedenen sozioökonomischen Gruppen in Ostdeutschland und Polen.

Methodisch wendet die Studie u.a. die „Qualitative Comparative Analysis“ an und kann so zeigen, dass sich national geprägte Deutungsmuster oder „Frames“ auf individuelle Wahrnehmungen der EU und deren Beurteilung auswirken. Dabei spielen aktuelle Diskussionen und historische Deutungsmuster eine größere Rolle als das vergangene sozialistische Regime und der nachfolgende Transformationsprozess. Gleichzeitig werden diese Frames durch persönliche Fähigkeiten und Erfahrungen gefiltert, so dass die EU-Einstellungen einer Person sowohl vom nationalen Kontext als auch vom sozialen Milieu beeinflusst werden.



Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2012
Copyright Year
2012
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-0012-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-4456-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studien zur Politischen Soziologie. Studies on Political Sociology
Volume
21
Language
English
Pages
326
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 2 - 12
    Authors:
  2. List of Figures No access Pages 13 - 14
    Authors:
  3. List of Tables No access Pages 15 - 16
    Authors:
    1. Research context, research questions, and main findings No access Pages 17 - 22
      Authors:
    2. The relevance of citizens’ EU attitudes No access Pages 22 - 27
      Authors:
    3. Research design and selection of societies No access Pages 27 - 28
      Authors:
    4. Further outline of the study No access Pages 28 - 30
      Authors:
    1. The concept of attitudes: definition, structure, and formation processes No access Pages 31 - 34
      Authors:
    2. Typologies of citizens’ EU attitudes No access Pages 34 - 40
      Authors:
      1. Economic models No access Pages 40 - 42
        Authors:
      2. Collective identities No access Pages 42 - 43
        Authors:
      3. Political cues No access Pages 43 - 45
        Authors:
      4. Citizens’ EU attitudes in post-communist societies No access Pages 45 - 48
        Authors:
      5. Empirical results No access Pages 48 - 51
        Authors:
    3. Discussion: citizens’ EU support, the role of public debates, and “framing” No access Pages 51 - 56
      Authors:
    1. Social constructionism and what people “know” No access Pages 57 - 60
      Authors:
    2. The role of communication and public discourses No access Pages 60 - 65
      Authors:
    3. Frames and framing No access Pages 65 - 72
      Authors:
    4. Consequences and determinants of framing No access Pages 72 - 76
      Authors:
    5. Discussion and heuristic hypotheses No access Pages 76 - 78
      Authors:
    1. “Where is the frame?” Operationalizing interpretative structures No access Pages 79 - 82
      Authors:
    2. Examining public EU frames in (Eastern) Germany and Poland No access Pages 82 - 83
      Authors:
      1. Constructing the interview schedule No access Pages 83 - 87
        Authors:
      2. Sampling No access Pages 87 - 90
        Authors:
      3. Conducting and transcribing the interviews No access Pages 90 - 92
        Authors:
      1. The inductive coding process No access Pages 92 - 94
        Authors:
      2. The deductive coding process: linking public and cognitive frames No access Pages 94 - 96
        Authors:
    3. Secondary analysis of cognitive frames: frequencies, classifications, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) No access Pages 96 - 102
      Authors:
    4. Discussion: the empirical analysis of public and cognitive EU frames No access Pages 102 - 104
      Authors:
    1. Historical roots No access Pages 105 - 111
      Authors:
    2. The GDR and “Europe” No access Pages 111 - 114
      Authors:
    3. The FRG and “Europe” No access Pages 114 - 121
      Authors:
    4. Germany and “Europe” after 1989 No access Pages 121 - 127
      Authors:
    5. Discussion: German public EU frames, their objects and attitudes No access Pages 127 - 132
      Authors:
    1. Historical roots No access Pages 133 - 136
      Authors:
    2. The Polish People’s Republic and “Europe” No access Pages 136 - 140
      Authors:
    3. Poland and “Europe” after 1989 No access Pages 140 - 148
      Authors:
    4. Discussion: Polish public EU frames, their objects and attitudes No access Pages 148 - 152
      Authors:
    5. Public frames in (Eastern) Germany and Poland: a comparison No access Pages 152 - 158
      Authors:
    1. Talking about the EU: some general remarks No access Pages 159 - 161
      Authors:
      1. “A Solidary Community“ No access Pages 161 - 164
        Authors:
      2. “A People’s Europe” No access Pages 164 - 166
        Authors:
      3. “A Beneficial Single Market” No access Pages 166 - 167
        Authors:
      4. “National Discrimination” No access Pages 167 - 170
        Authors:
      1. “A Disastrous Single Market” No access Pages 170 - 172
        Authors:
      2. “A Positive Lifeworld” No access Pages 172 - 173
        Authors:
      3. “A Threat to National Identity and Sovereignty” No access Pages 173 - 174
        Authors:
    2. Cognitive EU frames of minor relevance No access Pages 174 - 176
      Authors:
      1. The linkage between public and cognitive EU frames No access Pages 176 - 180
        Authors:
      2. The linkage to previous research No access Pages 180 - 184
        Authors:
      1. “A Bad Political System” No access Pages 185 - 189
        Authors:
      2. “A Global Player” No access Pages 189 - 191
        Authors:
      3. “Threats of Enlargement” No access Pages 191 - 192
        Authors:
      1. “An Inherent Necessity” No access Pages 192 - 194
        Authors:
      2. “A Legacy of World War II” No access Pages 194 - 195
        Authors:
      3. “Disappointment” No access Pages 195 - 196
        Authors:
    1. Cognitive EU frames, their objects and attitudes in Eastern Germany No access Pages 196 - 204
      Authors:
      1. “Modernization” No access Pages 204 - 207
        Authors:
      2. “Protection and Power” No access Pages 207 - 208
        Authors:
      1. “A European Identity” No access Pages 208 - 209
        Authors:
      2. “A Successful Transformation” No access Pages 209 - 211
        Authors:
    2. Cognitive EU frames, their objects and attitudes in Poland No access Pages 211 - 216
      Authors:
      1. Cognitive frames and their linkage to public frames, EU objects, and EU attitudes No access Pages 216 - 219
        Authors:
      2. The linkage to previous research No access Pages 219 - 222
        Authors:
    1. How Eastern Germans and Poles evaluate the EU No access Pages 223 - 225
      Authors:
      1. The EU framing of “committed supporters” No access Pages 225 - 229
        Authors:
      2. The EU framing of “critics” No access Pages 229 - 231
        Authors:
    2. EU framing and types of EU attitudes across national subgroups No access Pages 231 - 233
      Authors:
    3. The participants’ favored integration models No access Pages 233 - 237
      Authors:
      1. The transfer of legislative power No access Pages 237 - 239
        Authors:
      2. The EU’s social responsibility No access Pages 239 - 240
        Authors:
      3. The EU’s enlargement and Turkey’s accession No access Pages 240 - 244
        Authors:
    4. Discussion: cognitive frames, EU attitudes, and integration models No access Pages 244 - 248
      Authors:
    1. Sociodemographic and regional differences No access Pages 249 - 252
      Authors:
    2. The role of interest, collective identities, and the transformation process No access Pages 252 - 256
      Authors:
      1. Selection of cases and conditions No access Pages 256 - 260
        Authors:
      2. Conducting multi-value QCA No access Pages 260 - 261
        Authors:
      3. Summary of results No access Pages 261 - 272
        Authors:
      1. The relevance of social milieu No access Pages 272 - 276
        Authors:
      2. Cognitive EU frames of different social groups and their EU attitudes No access Pages 276 - 278
        Authors:
      1. Public EU constructions across national contexts No access Pages 279 - 280
        Authors:
      2. How citizens frame the EU: national and social variation No access Pages 280 - 283
        Authors:
    1. The linkage between cognitive EU frames, EU attitudes, and integration models No access Pages 283 - 286
      Authors:
    2. Post-communist features of public and cognitive EU frames No access Pages 286 - 287
      Authors:
      1. Qualitative research No access Pages 287 - 289
        Authors:
      2. Quantitative research No access Pages 289 - 292
        Authors:
      3. Frames and Values No access Pages 292 - 294
        Authors:
  4. Appendix No access Pages 295 - 304
    Authors:
  5. References No access Pages 305 - 326
    Authors:

Similar publications

from the series "Studien zur Politischen Soziologie. Studies on Political Sociology"
Cover of book: Positive Gerechtigkeitspflichten gegenüber Flüchtenden
Monograph Full access
Franziska Paulmann
Positive Gerechtigkeitspflichten gegenüber Flüchtenden
Cover of book: Migration - Adoleszenz - Identität
Monograph No access
Maja Vataman
Migration - Adoleszenz - Identität
Cover of book: EU und ASEAN
Monograph No access
Ines Vitic
EU und ASEAN
Cover of book: Ambivalence of Culture in Ghana's Alleged Witches' Camps
Monograph No access
Baba Iddrisu Musah
Ambivalence of Culture in Ghana's Alleged Witches' Camps
Cover of book: Diskurstheorie der Demokratie und Religion
Monograph No access
Tim Reiß
Diskurstheorie der Demokratie und Religion