RuZ - Recht und Zugang addresses all legal issues related to accessing digital collections, whether these may be libraries, museums or archives. The topics are almost unlimited and range from copyright to data protection law to labour law. Practical relevance is crucial : What requirements must be met in order to make digital content publicly accessible? What needs to be considered when collections want to digitize their holdings? Who is responsible for ensuring that the legal requirements are met? After all, it's about communication, because the most beautiful and important collections remain useless, if no one looks at them and nobody talks about them. Recht und Zugang not only aspires to look at collections in their entirety - from the municipal art library to the world-famous museum, but also to set the scene in which collections acquire their contents and process them in such a way that they are perceived and used. Recht und Zugang aims at the institutions themselves, ie at museums, archives and libraries, but also informs advisors who support collections in fulfilling their tasks. The journal’s aim is also reflected in the editorial board, which consists of experts who work in and for collections and assist those on a daily basis. Recht und Zugang is currently published with two issues a year and aspires to be as open as possible. The contributions are available in the Nomos eLibrary, published under a CC-BY-SA license.
For large, international publishers, open access has long become a business model. Article Processing Charges (APCs), i.e. fees that authors have to pay in order to be able to publish in a journal, are a way for them to secure their revenue. In...
Scientific research heavily relies on the exchange of ideas, knowledge and information. Thus, access to academic papers and scientific results is crucial for scholars and the broader public. In light of the current academic publishing system, the...
The Online Commentary (Onlinekommentar) dares to be new. It is the first non-profit platform for Open Access commentaries in Switzerland. It meets the highest level of Open Access: Diamond or Platinum Open Access. This means that the Online...
The article presents the initiative for open jurisprudence “OpenRewi”. The original goal of the initiative is to create a supporting infrastructure and platform for legal scholars who want to publish textbooks and other teaching materials, as...
Although the secondary publication right has been enshrined in German and Austrian copyright law, its scope remains limited and open to interpretation. In Switzerland, the secondary publication right was not even included in the last copyright...
Many paragraphs of the Austrian “Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch” (ABGB) have been in force for over 200 years and have remained largely unaltered linguistically. With the “Modernisation of the ABGB” project, Peter Bydlinski and his...
Open Access publishing in law and legal studies remains at a low level despite all efforts through institutional awareness campaigns and university and national funding instruments. Do research funding agencies offer effective and adequate funding...
Is accessing court decisions as easy and straightforward as legal scholars assume? Although court decisions are in the public domain according to Section 5 (1) var. 5 UrhG and a duty to publish court decisions is “tacitly” recognised in case law...
With Section 37a of the Austrian Copyright Law (öUrhG), the Austrian legislator intended to introduce a provision for secondary exploitation that is essentially modeled on Section 38 (4) of the German Copyright Law (dUrhG). In addition to the...