, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access
Political Leaders, the Display of Emotions, and the Public
An Empirical Study on the Coverage and Effects of Emotions in German Politics- Authors:
- | | |
- Series:
- Emotionen in Politik und Gesellschaft, Volume 2
- Publisher:
- 2023
Summary
Emotions have always been considered an important element of political communication. Recent research has demonstrated the significance of emotions in individual information-processing and political judgements. Used strategically, emotions thus become an instrument for influencing people. Based on content analyses of TV news and political talk shows in Germany, this book analyses with which emotions television portrays politicians and which techniques are used to trigger emotions in viewers. Using experiments, it investigates how portraying emotional politicians can affect political attitudes against the background of the theory of emotional contagion.
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2023
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-7560-1187-2
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-1782-3
- Publisher
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Series
- Emotionen in Politik und Gesellschaft
- Volume
- 2
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 294
- Product type
- Book Titles
Table of contents
ChapterPages
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 16
- 1.1. Emotions–A Core Element of Political Life No access
- 1.2. The Emergence of Research on Emotions in Politics–a Brief Overview No access
- 1.3. The Assumption of the Important (and Further Increasing) Role of Emotions in Politics No access
- 1.4. Are Emotions Really That Relevant? Some Arguments Why the Role of Emotions in Politics Might be Overrated No access
- 1.5. The Plan of the Book No access
- 2.1. Untangling the Core Concepts: Attitudes, Emotions, Mood No access
- 2.2.1. Valence Models and Valence-Arousal Models No access
- 2.2.2. Discrete and Basic Emotions No access
- 2.2.3. Dimensional Approaches No access
- 2.3.1. Primacy of Affect and Motivated Political Reasoning No access
- 2.3.2. Affective Intelligence No access
- 2.3.3. Emotional Contagion No access
- Choosing formats and channels No access
- Sampling No access
- Units of analysis No access
- Observations No access
- Dependent variables No access
- Independent variables No access
- 3.2.1. Design No access
- 3.2.2. Stimulus No access
- 3.2.3. Participants No access
- 3.2.4. Measurements No access
- 4.1.1. Previous Research No access
- Candidate characteristics No access
- Personal Characteristics No access
- Professional Characteristics No access
- Characteristics of the Context No access
- 4.1.3. Results No access
- 4.2.1. Potential Effects of Persuasive Camera Shots No access
- 4.2.2. Evidence on the Use of Persuasive Camera Shots in Televised Political Coverage No access
- 4.2.3. Results No access
- 4.3. Summary and Conclusion No access
- 5.1. State of the Art No access
- 5.2. Expectations No access
- 5.3. Operationalization and Data Preparation No access
- 5.4.1. Are Recipients Able to Perceive Emotions Displayed by Politicians on TV? No access
- 5.4.2. How Accurate is the Perception of Emotions? No access
- 5.4.3. How Strong are the Perceived Emotions? No access
- 5.4.4. Through Which Channels are Emotions Perceived? No access
- 5.5. Summary and Conclusion No access
- 6.1. The Role of the Experiment in Our Study Design No access
- 6.2. The Impact of Emotional Messages on the Image of German Political Leaders: Theoretical Perspectives and Hypotheses No access
- 6.3.1. Conceptualizations No access
- 6.3.2. Empirical Findings No access
- 6.4.1. How Emotional Displays Shape the General Assessment of the Political Leaders No access
- 6.4.2. The Impact of Emotional Appeals on Political Leaders’ Likeability No access
- 6.4.3. The Impact of Emotional Appeals on Political Leaders’ Trustworthiness No access
- 6.4.4. Emotional Appeals and the Attribution of Leadership Quality to Politicians No access
- 6.4.5. The Impact of Emotional Appeals on the Attribution of Competence to Political Leaders No access
- 6.4.5. The Impact of Emotional Appeals on the Attribution of Leadership Characteristics in a Competitive Setting No access
- 6.5. Summary and Conclusion No access
- 7.1.1. Hypotheses No access
- 7.1.2. Operationalization and Analysis Strategy No access
- 7.1.3. Results No access
- 7.1.4. Summary No access
- 7.2.1. Expectations No access
- 7.2.2. Operationalization No access
- 7.2.3. Results No access
- 7.2.4. Summary No access
- 7.3.1. Concept and Hypotheses No access
- 7.3.2. Operationalization No access
- 7.3.3. Results No access
- 7.3.4. Summary No access
- 7.4.1. Do Female Politicians Suffer from an Emotional Double Bind? No access
- Effects of German female politicians’ emotions No access
- Effects of German male politicians’ emotions No access
- 7.4.3. Methods No access
- 7.4.4. Results No access
- 7.4.5. Summary No access
- 7.5.1. Concept and Hypotheses No access
- 7.5.2. Operationalization No access
- 7.5.3. Results No access
- 7.5.4. Summary No access
- 7.6. Summary and Conclusion No access
- 8.1. Key Findings No access
- 8.2. Practical Implications for Politicians, Voters, and the Media No access
- 8.3. Open Questions and Suggestions for Further Research No access
- References No access Pages 261 - 294
Bibliography (564 entries)
No match found. Try another term.
- References Open Google Scholar
- Abelson, R. (1963). Computer simulation of “hot” cognition. In S. Tomkins & D. Messick (eds.), Computer simulation of personality (pp. 277–98). New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
- Abramson, P. M. (1983). Political attitudes in America. Formation and change. San Francisco, CA: Freeman Press. Open Google Scholar
- Adam, S. & Maier, M. (2010). Personalization of politics: A critical review and agenda for research. Communication Yearbook, 34, 213–57. Open Google Scholar
- Adolphs, R. (2006). Perception and emotion: How we recognize facial expressions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 222–6. Open Google Scholar
- Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press. Open Google Scholar
- Albæk, E., Van Dalen, A., Jebril, N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2014). Political journalism in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Alexander, F. (1959). Emotional factors in voting behavior. In E. Burdick & A. J. Brodbeck (eds.), American voting behavior (pp. 300–7). Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Open Google Scholar
- Alexander, M. G., & Wood, W. (2000). Women, men and positive emotions: A social role interpretation. In A. H. Fischer (ed.), Gender and emotion. Social psychological perspectives (pp. 89–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Almond. G. A. & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The civic culture revisited. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Archer, D., Iritani, B., Kimes, D. D., & Barrios, M. (1983). Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 725–35. Open Google Scholar
- Arendt, F. (2012). A newspapers effect on the strength of automatic associations in memory. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(1), 1–8. Open Google Scholar
- Aristotle (2018). Rhetoric. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. Open Google Scholar
- Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 41(3), 258–90. Open Google Scholar
- Atkinson, A. P., Dittrich, W. H., Gemmell, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2004). Emotion perception from dynamic and static body expressions in point-light and full-light displays. Perception, 33(6), 717–46. Open Google Scholar
- Bäck, H., & Debus, M. (2016). Political parties, parliament, and legislative speechmaking. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
- Baggaley, J., Ferguson, M., & Brooks, P. (1980). Psychology of the TV image. New York, NY: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
- Bakker, I., van der Voordt, T., Vink, P., & de Boon, J. (2014). Pleasure, arousal, dominance: Mehrabian and Russel revisited. Current Psychology, 33(3), 405–21. Open Google Scholar
- Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. Wyer (ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Barrett, F. L., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10–4. Open Google Scholar
- Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and is influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–75. Open Google Scholar
- Bauer, N. M. (2014). Emotional, sensitive, and unfit for office? Gender stereotype activation and support for female candidates. Political Psychology, 36(6), 691–708. Open Google Scholar
- Bauer, N. M. (2016). The effects of counterstereotypic gender strategies in candidate evaluations. Political Psychology, 38(2), 279–95. Open Google Scholar
- Beichelt, T. (2021). Homo Emotionalis. Zur Systematisierung von Gefühlen in der Politik. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar
- Bennett, E. M., & Goodwin, H. M. (1958). Emotional aspects of political behavior: The woman voter. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 48(1), 3–53. Open Google Scholar
- Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York, NY: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar
- Benoit, W. L. (2017). Meta-analysis of research on the functional theory of political campaign discourse. Speaker and Gavel, 54(1), 7–50. Open Google Scholar
- Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting. A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Bericat, E. (2016). The sociology of emotions: Four decades of progress. Current Sociology, 64(3), 491–513. Open Google Scholar
- Bittner, A. (2011). Platform or personality: The role of party leaders in elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Bono, J. E., & Illies, R. (2006). Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion. Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 317–34. Open Google Scholar
- Boone, R. T., & Buck, R. (2003). Emotional expressivity and trustworthiness: The role of nonverbal behavior in the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 163–82. Open Google Scholar
- Borod, J. C., Pick, L. H., Hall, S., Sliwinski, M., Madigan, N., Obler, L. K., Welkowitz, J., Canino, E., Erhan, H. M., Goral, M., Morrison, C., & Tabert, M. (2000). Relationships among facial, prosodic, and lexical channels of emotional perceptual processing. Cognition and Emotion, 14(2), 193–211. Open Google Scholar
- Bos, L., van der Brug, W. &, de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Media coverage of right-wing populist leaders. Communications, 35(2), 141–63. Open Google Scholar
- Bouhuys, A. L., Bloem, G. M., & Groothuis, T. G. G. (1995). Induction of depressed and elated mood by music influences the perception of facial emotional expressions in healthy subjects. Journal of Affective Disorders, 33(4), 215–26. Open Google Scholar
- Bower, G. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgments. In J. P. Forgas (ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 31–53). Oxford: Pergamon Press. Open Google Scholar
- Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405. Open Google Scholar
- Brader, T. (2006). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago, IL/London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Brader, T., & Marcus, G. E. (2013). Emotions and political psychology. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd edition, pp. 165–204). Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Braithwaite, V. (1998). Communal and exchange trust norms: Their value base and relevance for institutional trust. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (eds.). Trust & governance (Vol.1, pp. 46–74). New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundations. Open Google Scholar
- Brants, K., & van Praag, P. (2006). Signs of media logic: Half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost, 13(1), 25–40. Open Google Scholar
- Brescoll, V. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 415–28. Open Google Scholar
- Brescoll, V., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19(3), 268–75. Open Google Scholar
- Breunig, C., & Engel, B. (2015). Massenkommunikation 2015: Funktionen und Images der Medien im Vergleich. Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Landzeitstudie. Media Perspektiven 7–8/2015, 323–41. Open Google Scholar
- Breunig, C., Handel, M., & Kessler, B. (2020). Massenkommunikation 1964-2020: Mediennutzung im Langzeitvergleich – Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Langzeitstudie. Media Perspektiven, 7–8/2015, 410–32. Open Google Scholar
- Brody, L. R. (2000). The socialization of gender differences in emotional expressions: Display rules, infant temperament, and differentiation. In A. H. Fischer (ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 24–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 338–49). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Brody, L. R., Hall, J. A., & Stokes, L. R. (2016). Gender and emotion: Theory, findings, and context. In L. F. Barrett, M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (eds.), Handbook of emotion (4th edition, pp. 369–92). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Brooks, D. J. (2011). Testing the double standard for candidate emotionality: Voter reactions to tears and anger of male and female politicians. Journal of Politics, 73(2), 597–615. Open Google Scholar
- Brooks, D. J. (2013). He runs, she runs: Why gender stereotypes do not harm women candidates. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Buck, R. 1984. The communication of emotions. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P. (1998). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Viewer assessments of televised presidential reactions to compelling news events. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. (unpublished doctoral thesis) Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P. (2000). Emotional and evaluative consequences of inappropriate leader displays. Communication Research, 27(2), 194–226. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P. (2016). The look of losing, then and now: Nixon, Obama, and nonverbal indicators of opportunity lost. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1772–98. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P., & Bradley, S. D. (2004). Presidential expressions and viewer emotion: Counterempathic responses to televised leader displays. Social Science Information, 43(1), 59–94. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P., & Grabe, M. E. (2007). Taking television seriously: A sound and image bite analysis of presidential campaign coverage, 1992–2004. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 652–75. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P., & Grabe, M. E. (2008). “Happy warriors” revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news. Politics and Life Science, 27(1), 78–98. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (1999a). The emotional appropriateness heuristic: Processing televised presidential reactions to the news. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 59–79. Open Google Scholar
- Bucy, E. P., & Newhagen, J. E. (1999b). The micro‐and macrodrama of politics on television: Effects of media format on candidate evaluations. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43(2), 193–210. Open Google Scholar
- Bundesregierung (2018). Das Bundeskabinett. Retrieved from https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/_Anlagen/Bundeskabinett_PDF.pdf;jsessionid=F12BD4B78FB98281DE545C7E963C4483.s4t2?__blob=publicationFileandv=38 Open Google Scholar
- Burgess, D. G., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665–92. Open Google Scholar
- Burgoon, J. K. (1980). Nonverbal communication research in the 1970s: An overview. Communication Yearbook, 4, 179–97. Open Google Scholar
- Bystrom, D. G., & Kaid, L. L. (2002). Are women candidates transforming campaign communication? A comparison of advertising videostyles in the 1990s. In C. S. Rosenthal (eds.), Women transforming Congress (pp. 146–69). Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Open Google Scholar
- Bystrom, D. G., & Miller, J. L. (1999). Gendered communication styles and strategies in campaign 1996: The videostyles of women and men candidates. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 293–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Bystrom, D. G., Banwart, M. C., Kaid, L. L., & Robertson, T. A. (2004). Gender and candidate communication. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191–214. Open Google Scholar
- Calder, A. J., Keane, J., Manly, T., Sprengelmeyer, R., Scott, S., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Young, A. W. (2003). Facial expression recognition across the adult life span. Neuropsychologia, 41(2), 195–202. Open Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson. Open Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
- Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1997). Politicians uniquely simple personalities. Nature, 385, 493. Open Google Scholar
- Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). When parsimony subdues distinctiveness: Simplified public perceptions of politicians’ personality. Political Psychology, 23(1), 77–95. Open Google Scholar
- Carlson, T. (2001). Gender and political advertising across cultures: A comparison of male and female political advertising in Finland and the US. European Journal of Communication, 16(2), 131–54. Open Google Scholar
- Carmines, E. G., & Stimson, J. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91. Open Google Scholar
- Carstensen, L. L., Gottman. J. M., & Levenson. R. W. (1995). Emotional behavior in long-term marriage. Psychology and Aging, 10(1), 140–9. Open Google Scholar
- Cassino, D., & Lodge, M. (2007). The primacy of affect in political evaluations. In R. W. Neuman, G. Marcus, A. Cigler, & M. MacKuen (eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 124–51). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Chanley, V.A. (2002). Trust in government in the aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and consequences. Political Psychology, 23(3), 469–83. Open Google Scholar
- Cho, J., Boyle, M. P., Keum, H., Shevy, M. D., McLeod, D. M., Shah, D. V., & Pan, Z. (2003). Media, terrorism, and emotionality: Emotional differences in media content and public reactions to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47(3), 309–27. Open Google Scholar
- Christ, W. G., Thorson, E., & Caywood, C. (1994). Do attitudes toward political advertising affect information processing of televised political commercials? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(3), 251–70. Open Google Scholar
- Ciabattari, T. (2001). Changes in men’s conversative gender ideologies: Cohort and period influences. Gender and Society, 15(4), 574–91. Open Google Scholar
- Cicero (2001). On the ideal orator. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Clevenger, T., & Knepprath, E. (1966). A quantitative analysis of logical and emotional content in selected campaign addresses of Eisenhower and Stevenson. Western Speech 30(3), 144–50. Open Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., & Gasper, K. (2000). Feeling is believing: Some affective influences on beliefs. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead & S. Bem (eds.), Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts (pp. 10–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., & Isbell, L. M. (2001). Emotion as virtue and vice. In J. H. Kuklinski (ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 103–23). Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (ed.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes (Vol. 1, pp. 323–417). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y, & Sheafer, T. (2008). The influence of presumed media influence in politics: Do politicians’ perceptions of media power matter? Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 331–44. Open Google Scholar
- Costa Lobo, M., & Curtice, J. (2015). Personality politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Crigler, A., Just, M., & Belt, T. (2006). The three faces of negative campaigning: The democratic implications of attack ads, cynical news, and fear arousing messages. In D. P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling politics: Emotions in political information processing (pp. 135–63). New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
- Crivelli, C., & Fridlund, A. J. (2018). Facial displays are tools for social influence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(5), 388–99. Open Google Scholar
- Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. Open Google Scholar
- Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York, NY: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
- Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced western democracies (5th edition). Washington, DC: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2013). The apartisan American: Dealignment and changing electoral politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press. Open Google Scholar
- Dalton, R. J. (2017). Political trust in North America. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 375–94). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
- Damen, F., van Knippenberg, B., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Leader affective displays and attribution of charisma: The role of arousal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2594–614. Open Google Scholar
- Davies, M. M., Berry, C., & Clifford, B. (1985). Unkindest cuts? Some effects of picture editing on recall of television news information. Journal of Educational Television, 11(2), 85–98. Open Google Scholar
- de Vreese, C. H., Reinemann, C., Esser, F., Hopmann, D. N., Aalberg, T., Van Aelst, P., Berganza, R., Hubé, N., Legnante, G., Matthes, J., Papathanassopoulos, S., Salgado, S., Sheafer, T., Stanyer, J., & Strömbäck, J. (2017). Conclusion: Assessing news performance. In C. H. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (eds.), Comparing political journalism (pp. 168–83). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Deak, A. (2011). Brain and emotion: Cognitive neuroscience of emotions. Review of Psychology, 18(2), 71–80. Open Google Scholar
- DeFleur, M. L. (1970). Theories of mass communication (2nd edition). New York, NY: David McKay. Open Google Scholar
- Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Deutscher Bundestag (2017a). Alters- und Sozialstruktur: weibliche Abgeordnete. Retrieved from https://www.bundestag.de/blob/272482/07548b0b36d708c3a751a85711cdccbb/kapitel_03_06_weibliche_abgeordnete-pdf-data.pdf Open Google Scholar
- Deutscher Bundestag (2017b). Frauen und Männer. Retrieved from https://www.bundestag.de/abgeordnete/biografien/mdb_zahlen_19/frauen_maenner/529508 Open Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1985). Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology, 21(3), 542–46. Open Google Scholar
- Dimberg, U., & Lundquist, L. O. (1990). Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 30(2), 151–59. Open Google Scholar
- Doherty, R. W. (1998). Emotional contagion and social judgment. Motivation and Emotion, 22(3), 187–209. Open Google Scholar
- Donsbach, W. (1991). Exposure to political content in newspapers: The impact of cognitive dissonance on readers selectivity. European Journal of Communication, 6(2), 155–86. Open Google Scholar
- Donsbach, W., & Büttner, K. (2005). Boulevardisierungstrend in deutschen Fernsehnachrichten: Darstellungsmerkmale der Politikberichterstattung vor den Bundestagswahlen 1983, 1990 und 1998. Publizistik, 50(1), 21–38. Open Google Scholar
- Dowd, M. (2008). Can Hillary cry her way back to the White House? Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/09/opinion/08dowd.html Open Google Scholar
- Drew, D. G., & Cadwell, R. (1985). Some effects of video editing on perceptions of television news. Journalism Quarterly, 62(4), 828–49. Open Google Scholar
- Drinkmann, N., & Caballero, C. (2007). Eine Frau ist eine Frau ist eine Frau? Die Berichterstattung über die Kandidaten der Bundestagswahl 2004. In C. Holtz-Bacha & N. König-Reiling (eds.), Warum nicht gleich? Wie die Medien mit Frauen in der Politik umgehen (pp. 167–203). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Duhaney, A., & McKelvie, S. J. (1993). Gender differences in accuracy of identification and rated intensity of facial expressions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76(3), 716–18. Open Google Scholar
- Dumitrescu, D. (2016). Nonverbal communication in politics: A review of research developments, 2005-2015. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(14), 1656–75. Open Google Scholar
- Dumitrescu, D., Gidengil, E., & Stolle, D. (2015). Candidate confidence and electoral appeal: An experimental study of the effect of nonverbal confidence on voter evaluations. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 43–52. Open Google Scholar
- Durand, K., Gallay, M., Seigneuric, A., Robichon, F., & Baudouin, J. Y. (2007). The development of facial emotion recognition: The role of configural information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97(1), 14–27. Open Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Open Google Scholar
- Eagly. A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15(4), 543–58. Open Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership style of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–97. Open Google Scholar
- Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47(3/4), 99–114. Open Google Scholar
- Edgar, C., McRorie, M., & Sneddon, I. (2012). Emotional intelligence, personality and the decoding of non-verbal expressions of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 295–300. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319–44). New York, NY: Psychological Press. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1992a). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–3. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1992b). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3/4), 169–200. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 268–87. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Cordaro, D. (2011). What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emotion Review, 3(4), 364–70. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17(2), 124–29. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewoods Cliff: Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Ellsworth, P. (1982). What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior? In P. Ekman (ed.), Emotion in the human face (pp. 39-55). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Elfenbein, H. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326–62. Open Google Scholar
- Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203–35. Open Google Scholar
- Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2010). Beyond American negativity: Toward a general understanding on the determinants of negative campaigning. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 137–56. Open Google Scholar
- Engel, B., & Breunig, C. (2015). Massenkommunikation 2015: Mediennutzung im Intermediavergleich. Media Perspektiven, 7–8/2015, 310–22. Open Google Scholar
- Erisen, C. (2009). Affective contagion: The impact of subtle affective cues in political thinking. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University. (unpublished doctoral thesis) Open Google Scholar
- Erisen, C., Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2014). Affective contagion in effortful political thinking. Political Psychology, 35(2), 187–206. Open Google Scholar
- Erwin, R. J., Gur, R. C., Skolnick, B., Mawhinney-Hee, M., & Smailis, J. (1992). Facial emotion discrimination: I. Task construction and behavioral findings in normal subjects. Psychiatry Research, 42(3), 231–40. Open Google Scholar
- Esser, F. (1999). “Tabloidization” of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324. Open Google Scholar
- Esser, F., de Vreese, C. H., Hopmann, D. N., Aalberg, T., Van Aelst, P., Berganza, R., Hubé, N., Legnante, G., Matthes, J., Papathanassopoulos, S., Reinemann, C., Salgado, S., Sheafer, T., Stanyer, J., & Strömbäck, J. (2017). The explanatory logic: Factors that shape political news. In C. H. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (eds.), Comparing political journalism (pp. 22–32). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- European Commission (2018). Standard Eurobarometer 88, Autumn 2017: Media use in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission. Open Google Scholar
- European Parliamentary Research Service (2019). Women in politics: A global perspective. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/635543/EPRS_BRI(2019)635543_EN.pdf Open Google Scholar
- Falter, J. W. (1972). Ein Modell zur Analyse individuellen politischen Verhaltens. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 13(4), 547–66. Open Google Scholar
- Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204–43). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Fazio, R. H., Kardes, F. R., & Powell, M. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229–38. Open Google Scholar
- Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 304–41. Open Google Scholar
- Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). The relation between gender and emotion in different cultures. In A. H. Fischer (ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 71–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Fischer, A. H., Mosquera, P. M., Vianen, A. E. M., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004). Gender and culture differences in emotion. Emotion, 4(1), 87–94. Open Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, J. C., & Glick, P. (2006). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. Open Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2017). Social cognition: From brain to culture (3rd edition). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Forgas, J. P. (1994). The role of emotion in social judgments: An introductory review and an Affect Infusion Model (AIM). European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 1–24. Open Google Scholar
- Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 39–66. Open Google Scholar
- Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2012). The impact of negative campaigning on citizens’ actions and attitudes. In H. A. Semetko & M. Scammell (eds.), The SAGE handbook of political communication (pp. 173–85). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Fulcher, M., Sutfin, E., & Patterson, C. J. (2008). Individual differences in gender development: Associations with parental sexual orientation, attitudes, and division of labor. Sex Roles, 58(5–6), 330–41. Open Google Scholar
- Fuller, J. (2010). What is happening to news: The information explosion and the crisis in journalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Gabriel, O. W. (2019). Der Einfluss emotionaler Botschaften auf die Einstellungen zum politischen Führungspersonal. Ergebnisse einer experimentellen Studie. In J. Mayerl, T. Krause, A. Wahl & M. Wuketich (eds.), Einstellungen und Verhalten in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Analytische Konzepte, Anwendungen und Analyseverfahren (pp. 273–99). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Gabriel, O. W., & Kornelius, B. (2011). Die baden-württembergische Landtagswahl vom 27. März 2011: Zäsur oder Zeitenwende? Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 42(4), 748–68. Open Google Scholar
- Gabriel, O. W. & Maier, J. (2022). Regieren und Emotionen. In K.-R. Korte & M. Florack (eds.), Handbuch Regierungsforschung. (pp. 723–34). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Gabriel, O. W. & Masch, L. (2017). Displays of emotion and citizen support for Merkel und Gysi. How emotional contagion affects evaluation of leadership. Politics and Life Sciences, 36(1), 80–103. Open Google Scholar
- Gabriel, O. W., & Neller, K. (2005). Kandidatenorientierungen und Wahlverhalten bei den Bundestagswahlen 1994–2002. In J. W. Falter, O. W. Gabriel & B. Weßels (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2002 (pp. 213–43). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Gallup (2017). Media use and evaluations. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/1663/media-use-evaluation.aspx Open Google Scholar
- Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crisis in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–91. Open Google Scholar
- Garzia, D. (2017). Voter evaluation of candidates and party leaders. In K. Arzheimer, J. Evans & M. S. Lewis-Beck (eds.), The Sage handbook of electoral behaviour (pp. 633–53). Los Angeles: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Geise, S., & Rössler, P. (2012). Visuelle Inhaltsanalyse: Ein Vorschlag zur theoretischen Dimensionierung der Erfassung von Bildinhalten. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 60(3), 341–61. Open Google Scholar
- Gerstlé, J., & Nai, A. (2019). Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success. European Journal of Communication, 34(4), 410–44. Open Google Scholar
- Giltrow, D. (1977). More than meets the eye: Discrepancies in cognitive and affective adult student responses to live television production styles. In T. Bates & J. Robinson (eds.), Evaluating educational television and radio. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Glaab, M., & Weigl, M. (2013). Politik und Regieren in Bayern: Rahmenbedingungen, Strukturmerkmale, Entwicklungen. In M. Glaab & M. Weigl (eds.), Politik und Regieren in Bayern (pp. 19–96). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Glaser, J., & Salovey, P. (1998). Affect in electoral politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 156–72. Open Google Scholar
- Glinitzer, K., & Jungmann, N. (2019). Spitzenkandidaten. In S. Roßteutscher, R. Schmitt-Beck, H. Schoen, B. Weßels, C. Wolf, B. Barkela, I. Bauer, I. Bieber, K. Blinzler, M. Blumenberg, J. E. Blumenstiel, H. Bucher, M. Dietz, T. Faas, L. Gärtner, H. Giebler, K. Glinitzer, T. Gummer, L. Heiber, S. Huber, N. Jungmann, A. Kratz, J. Lichteblau, M. Maier, J. Maier, R. Melcher, M. Reißinger, S. Richter, J. Roßmann, L. Schackmann, A. Schäfer, P. Scherer, A. Staudt, L.-C. Stövsand, A.-K. Stroppe, A. Wagner, & A. Wuttke, Zwischen Polarisierung und Beharrung: Die Bundestagswahl 2017 (pp. 247–61). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Gooty, J., Connelly, S., Griffith, J., & Gupta, A. (2010). Leadership, affect and emotions: A state of the science review. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 979–1004. Open Google Scholar
- Grabe, M. E., & Bucy. E. P. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40(3), 134–55. Open Google Scholar
- Graber, D. A. (1996). Say it with pictures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546(1), 85–96. Open Google Scholar
- Graber, D. A. (2004). Mediated politics and citizenship in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 545–71. Open Google Scholar
- Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsychology of anxiety. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1995). Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(4), 555–68. Open Google Scholar
- Gross, J. J., Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Tsai, J., Hsu, A. Y. C., & Skorpen, C. G. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 590–99. Open Google Scholar
- Groves, R. M., Presser, S., & Dipko, S. (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 2–31. Open Google Scholar
- Gscheidle, C., & Geese, S. (2017). Die Informationsqualität der Fernsehnachrichten aus Zuschauersicht. Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativbefragung zur Bewertung der Fernsehnachrichten 2016. Media Perspektiven, 6/2017, 310–24. Open Google Scholar
- Gunsch, M. A., Brownlow, S., Haynes, S. E., & Mabe, Z. (2000). Differential forms linguistic content of various of political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 27–42. Open Google Scholar
- Haddock, G., Maio, G. R., Arnold, K. & Huskinson, T. (2008). Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(6), 769–78. Open Google Scholar
- Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Hall, J. A., & Matsumoto, D. (2004). Gender differences in judgments of multiple emotions from facial expressions. Emotion, 4(2), 201–6. Open Google Scholar
- Hallin, D. C. (1992). Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968–88. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 5–24. Open Google Scholar
- Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (1985). Speaking of the president: Political structure and representation form in U.S. and Italian television. Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 5, 205–26. Open Google Scholar
- Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(6), 401–16. Open Google Scholar
- Hareli, S., Shomrat, N., & Hess, U. (2009). Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion, 9(3), 378–84. Open Google Scholar
- Hareli, S., Berkovitch, N., Livnat, L., & David, S. (2013). Anger and shame as determinants of perceived competence. International Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 1080–9. Open Google Scholar
- Harrison, D. W., Gorelczenko, P. M., & Cook, J. (1990). Sex differences in the functional asymmetry for facial affect perception. International Journal of Neuroscience, 52(1–2), 11–6. Open Google Scholar
- Hartmann, G. W. (1936). A field experiment on the comparative effectiveness of “emotional” and “rational” political leaflets in determining election results. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31(1), 99–114. Open Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. In M. S. Clark (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion and social behavior (pp. 151–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1993). Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 2(3), 96–9. Open Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Haumer, F., & Donsbach, W. (2009). The rivalry of nonverbal cues on the perception of politicians by television viewers. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 53(2), 262–79. Open Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7(11), 1097–1108. Open Google Scholar
- Heidenreich, F. (2014). Gefühle ins Recht setzen: Wann sind politische Emotionen (noch) demokratisch? Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 23(4), 575-583. Open Google Scholar
- Heidenreich, F. & Schaal, G. S. (2012). Versuch eines Überblicks: Politische Theorie und Emotionen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Herman, C. P. (1990). Pessimistic rumination and electoral defeat: A shorter but wider view. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 64–5. Open Google Scholar
- Hess, U., & Kirouac, G. (2000). Emotion expression in groups. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones & L. F. Barrett (eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edition, pp. 504–21). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Hester, J. B., & Dougall, E. (2007). The efficiency of constructed week sampling for content analysis of online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(4), 811–24. Open Google Scholar
- Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won’t work. Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Hitchon, J. C., Chang, C., & Harris, R. (1997). Should women emote? Perceptual bias and opinion change in response to political ads for candidates of different genders. Political Communication, 14(1), 49–69. Open Google Scholar
- Hockin, T. A. (1971). The roles of the loyal opposition in Britain’s House of Commons: Three historical paradigms. Parliamentary Affairs, 25(1), 50–68. Open Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, H., Kessler, H., Eppel, T., Rukavina, S., & Traue, H. C. (2010). Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: Women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 278–83. Open Google Scholar
- Hoheisel, B., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2005). Emotionserkennung in Gesichtern und emotionales Gesichtergedächtnis. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 16(2), 77–87. Open Google Scholar
- Höijer, B. (2010). Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 717–31. Open Google Scholar
- Hojo, H. (1987). Psychophysical scaling of smiling faces. Japanese Psychological Research, 29(1), 37–41. Open Google Scholar
- Hojo, H. (1988). Analysis of saliency of facial features through psychophysical scaling. Japanese Psychological Research, 30(1), 42–6. Open Google Scholar
- Holtz-Bacha, C. (1991). From public monopoly to a dual broadcasting system in Germany. European Journal of Communication, 6(2), 223–33. Open Google Scholar
- Holtz‐Bacha, C., Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (1994). Political television advertising in western democracies: A comparison of campaign broadcasts in the United States, Germany, and France. Political Communication, 11(1), 67–80. Open Google Scholar
- Holtz-Bacha, C., & Lesser, E.-M. (2016). Die Königin, der Rausschmeißer und die gemeine Filzlaus: Die Wahlwerbespots der Parteien im Bundestagswahlkampf 2013. In C. Holtz-Bacha (ed.), Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf: Die Bundestagswahl 2013 (pp. 71–90). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Houghton, D. H. (2009). Political psychology: Situations, individuals, and cases. New York, NY/London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Hovland, C. I. & Janis, I. L. (1970). An overview of persuability research. In K. K. Sereno & C. D. Mortensen (eds.), Foundations of communication theory (pp. 222–33). New York, NY: Harper and Row. Open Google Scholar
- Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–50. Open Google Scholar
- Huber, S. (2015). What comes first, character traits or political assessments? An experimental study. In M. Costa Lobo & J. Curtice (eds.), Personality politics? The role of leader evaluations in democratic elections (pp. 38–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Huddy, L. (1994). The political significance of voters’ gender stereotypes. In M. X. Delli Carpini, L. Huddy & R. Y. Shapiro (eds.), Research in micropolitics: New directions in political psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 169–93). Greenwich, CT: JAI. Open Google Scholar
- Humphrey, R. & Pollack, J. (2008). Leading with emotional labor. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(2), 151–68. Open Google Scholar
- Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1099–1120. Open Google Scholar
- Inter-Parliamentary Union (2018). Women in national parliament. Retrieved from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm Open Google Scholar
- Isaacowitz, D. M., Löckenhoff, C. E., Lane, R. D., Wright, R., Sechrest, L., Riedel, R., & Costa, P. T. (2007). Age differences in recognition of emotion in lexical stimuli and facial expressions Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 147–59. Open Google Scholar
- Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Open Google Scholar
- Izard, C. E. (1994). Die Emotionen des Menschen: Eine Einführung in die Grundlagen der Emotionspsychologie (3rd edition). Weinheim: Beltz. Open Google Scholar
- Jackman, S., & Sniderman, P. S. (2002). Institutional organization of choice spaces: A political conception of political psychology. In K. R. Monroe (ed.), Political psychology (pp. 209–24). Mahwah, NJ/London: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Jacobs, L. R., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2000). Politicians don’t pander: Political manipulation and the loss of democratic responsiveness. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205. Open Google Scholar
- Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Jansen, A., Bente, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2010). Wahlkampf 2005: Eine inhaltsanalytische Untersuchung der Inszenierung von Angela Merkel und Gerhard Schröder in den Fernsehnachrichten unter Berücksichtigung des Geschlechterstereotyps. In T. Faas, K. Arzheimer & S. Roßteutscher (eds.), Information – Wahrnehmung – Emotion: Politische Psychologie in der Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung (pp. 33–50). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Jerit, J. (2004). Survival of the fittest: Rhetoric during a course of an election campaign. Political Psychology, 25(4), 563–75. Open Google Scholar
- Johnston, A. (1999). Political advertising during the 1996 North Carolina Senate race: The Helms and Gantt rematch. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 303–15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Johnston, A., & Kaid, L. L. (2002). Image ads and issue ads in U.S. presidential advertising: Using videostyle to explore stylistic differences in televised political ads from 1952 to 2000. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 281–300. Open Google Scholar
- Jones, P. E., Hoffmann, L. H, & Young, D. G. (2012). Online emotional appeals and political participation: The effect of candidate affect on mass behavior. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1132–50. Open Google Scholar
- Joyce, M. (2012). The Soviet montage cinema of the 1920s. In J. Nelmes (ed.), Introduction to film studies (5th edition, pp. 445–79). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Juen, F., Huber, E. B., & Peham, D. (2012). Geschlechts-und Altersunterschiede in der Emotionserkennung von Kindern und Jugendlichen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44(4), 178–91. Open Google Scholar
- Juslin, P. N., & Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: Different channels, same code? Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 770–814. Open Google Scholar
- Kaase, M., & Newton, K. (1995). Beliefs in government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 17–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Kaid, L. L. (1999). Comparing and contrasting the styles and effects of political advertising in European democracies. In L. L. Kaid (ed.), Television and politics in evolving European democracies (pp. 219–36). New York, NY: Nova Science. Open Google Scholar
- Kaid, L. L., & A. Johnston (2001). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport, CT: Greenwood. Open Google Scholar
- Kaid, L. L., Leland, C., & Whitney, S. (1992). The impact of televised political ads: Evoking viewer responses in the 1988 presidential campaign. Southern Communication Journal, 57(4), 285–95. Open Google Scholar
- Kaid, L. L., & Tedesco, J.C. (1999). Presidential candidate presentation: Videostyle in the 1996 presidential spots. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 209–21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Kamps, K. (1998). „Zur Politik nach Bonn...“ In K. Kamps & M. Meckel (eds.), Fernsehnachrichten. Prozesse, Strukturen, Funktionen (pp. 39–48). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Kämpfer, S., & Mutz, M. (2014). Der Einfluss positiver und negativer Stimmungen von Befragten auf ihr Antwortverhalten in politischen Meinungsumfragen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 55(2), 268–94. Open Google Scholar
- Kappas, A. (2009). Ausdruck: Kommunikations- und Regulationsmedium. In G. Stemmler (ed.), Psychologie der Emotion (pp. 387–443). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Open Google Scholar
- Kappas, A., Hess, U., Barr, C. L., & Kleck, R. E. (1994). Angle of regard: The effect of vertical viewing angle on the perception of facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(4), 263–80. Open Google Scholar
- Kelly, J. R., & Hutson-Comeaux, S. L. (1999). Gender-emotion stereotypes are context specific. Sex Roles, 40(1–2), 107–20. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M. (1982). Visual biases in television campaign coverage. Communication Research, 9(3), 432–46. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M. (1987). Darstellungseffekte. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Pressefotos und Fernsehfilmen. Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M. (1998). Die Demontage der Politik in der Informationsgesellschaft. Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M. (2010). Nonverbale Medienkommunikation: Der Einfluss von Gestik, Mimik und Sprechweise auf den Betrachter. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M., Brosius, H. B., & Staab, J. F. (1991). Opinion formation in mediated conflicts and crisis: A theory of cognitive-affective media effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3(2), 132–56. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M., & Donsbach, W. (1986). The influences of changes in camera perspective on the perception of a speaker. Communication, 12(2), 38–43. Open Google Scholar
- Kepplinger, H. M., & Donsbach, W. (1990). The impact of camera perspectives on the perception of a speaker. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 16(1), 133–56. Open Google Scholar
- Kern, M. (1989). 30-second politics: Political advertising in the eighties. New York, NY: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
- Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (eds.), Political cognition (pp. 233–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., Abelson, R. P., & Fiske, S. T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior, 2(4), 315–37. Open Google Scholar
- Kipper, P. (1986). Television camera movement as a source of perceptual information. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30(3), 295–307. Open Google Scholar
- Kirchgässner, G., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1993). Low-cost decisions as a challenge to public choice. Public Choice, 77(1), 107–15. Open Google Scholar
- Kirouac, G., & Doré, F. Y. (1983). Accuracy and latency of judgment fo facial expressions of emotion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57(3), 683–6. Open Google Scholar
- Klein, M., & Ohr, D. (2001). Die Wahrnehmung der politischen und persönlichen Eigenschaften von Helmut Kohl und Gerhard Schröder und ihr Einfluss auf die Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 1998. In H.-D. Klingemann & M. Kaase (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 1998 (pp. 91–132). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Kliemt, H. (1986). The veil of insignificance. European Journal of Political Economy, 2(3), 333–44. Open Google Scholar
- Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich (2021). 23. Jahresbericht 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2023 from https://www.kek-online.de/fileadmin/user_upload/KEK/Publikationen/Jahresberichte/23._Jahresbericht.pdf Open Google Scholar
- König, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–42. Open Google Scholar
- Korte, K. R. (ed.) (2015). Emotionen und Politik. Begründungen, Konzeptionen und Praxisfelder einer politikwissenschaftlichen Emotionsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Kraft, R. N. (1986). The role of cutting in the evaluation and retention of a film. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(1), 155–63. Open Google Scholar
- Krendl, A., & Ambady, N. (2010). Older adults decoding of emotions: Role of dynamic versus static cues and age-related cognitive decline. Psychology and Aging, 25(4), 788–93. Open Google Scholar
- Krupnikov, Y., & Bauer, N. (2014). The relationship between campaign negativity, gender and campaign context. Political Behavior, 36(1), 167–88. Open Google Scholar
- Kühne, R., Schemer, C., Matthes, J., & Wirth, W. (2011). Affective priming in political campaigns: How campaign-induced emotions prime political opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(4), 485–507. Open Google Scholar
- Lamplmayr, E., & Kryspin-Exner, I. (2011). Gender-Aspekte in der Neuropsychologie: Neuronale, kognitive und emotionale Geschlechterunterschiede. In J. Lehrner, G. Pusswald, E. Fertl, W. Strubreither, W., & I. Krypsin-Exner (eds.), Klinische Neuropsychologie: Grundlagen – Diagnostik – Rehabilitation (pp. 739–49). Wien: Springer. Open Google Scholar
- Lang, A. (1991). Emotion, formal features, and memory of televised political advertisements. In F. Biocca (ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 221¬43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Lang, A., Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J. (1993). The effects of related and unrelated cuts on television viewers attention, processing capacity, and memory. Communication Research, 20(1), 4–29. Open Google Scholar
- Lang, A., Zhou, S., Schwartz, N., Bolls, P. D., & Potter, R. F. (2000). The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(1), 94–109. Open Google Scholar
- Lanzetta, J. T., Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., & McHugo, G. J. (1985). Emotional and cognitive responses to televised images of political leaders. In S. Kraus & R. M. Perloff (eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 85–116). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotion (Vol. 13, pp. 25–59). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Lau, R. R. (1986). Political schemata, candidate evaluations and voting behavior. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (eds.), Political cognition (pp. 95–126). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37(9), 1019–24. Open Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124–9. Open Google Scholar
- Lazarus, R. S. (1999). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (eds.), Handbook of cognitions and emotions (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
- Lee, R. S. (1978). Credibility of newspaper and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 55(2), 282–7. Open Google Scholar
- Levenson, R. W. (1996). Biological substrates of empathy and facial modulation of emotion: Two facets of the scientific legacy of John Lanzetta. Motivation and Emotion, 20(3), 185–204. Open Google Scholar
- Levenson, R. W. (1999). The intrapersonal functions of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 481–504. Open Google Scholar
- Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., Friesen, W. V., & Ekman, P. (1991). Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. Psychology and Aging, 6(1), 28–35. Open Google Scholar
- Lewis, K. M. (2000). When leaders display emotions: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 221–34. Open Google Scholar
- Lewis-Beck, M., Jacobi, W. G., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008). The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
- Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2nd edition). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York, NY: MacMillan. Open Google Scholar
- Listhaug, O. (1995). The dynamics of trust in politicians. In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs (eds.), Citizen and the state (p. 261–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83(2), 399–419. Open Google Scholar
- Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins & S. L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 183–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455–82. Open Google Scholar
- Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2013). The rationalizing voter. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Lodge, M., Taber, C. S., & Weber, C. (2006). First steps toward a dual-process accessibility model of political beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. In D. P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
- Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2). doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x Open Google Scholar
- Lombard, M., Reich, R. D., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C. C., & Ditton, T. B. (2000). Presence and television. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75–98. Open Google Scholar
- Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces–KDEF. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet, Psychology section. Open Google Scholar
- Lupia, A. & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Machiavelli, N. (2018). The prince. Mountain View, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Open Google Scholar
- MacKuen, M., Marcus, G. E., Neuman, R. L., & Keele, S. (2007). The third way: The theory of affective intelligence and American democracy. In G. E. Marcus, R. W. Neuman & M. MacKuen (eds.), Affective intelligence and political judgment (pp. 124–51). Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Madera, J. M., & Smith, D. B. (2009). The effects of leader negative emotions on evaluations of leadership in a crisis situation: The role of anger and sadness. Leadership Quarterly, 20(2), 103–14. Open Google Scholar
- Maier, J. (2021). Will fouls in politics be punished? An experiment on the effect of incivility on the support for the sender and for the political system. In A. S. Walter (ed.), Political incivility in the parliamentary, electoral and media arena: Crossing boundaries. London: Routledge, 200–18. Open Google Scholar
- Maier, J., Glantz, A., & Bathelt, S. (2009). Was wissen die Bürger über Politik? Zur Erforschung der politischen Kenntnisse in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949 bis 2008. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 40(3), 561–78. Open Google Scholar
- Maier, J., Glogger, I., Otto, L. P., & Bast, J. (2023). Is there a visual bias in televised debates? Evidence from Germany, 2002–17. Visual Communication, 22(2), 221–42. Open Google Scholar
- Maier, J., & Jansen, C. (2017). When do candidates attack in election campaigns? Exploring the determinants of negative candidate messages in German televised debates. Party Politics, 23(5), 549–59. Open Google Scholar
- Maier, J. & Nai, A. (2020). Roaring candidates in the spotlight. Campaign negativity, emotions, and media coverage in 107 national elections. International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(4), 576–606. Open Google Scholar
- Maier, M. (2002). Zur Konvergenz des Fernsehens in Deutschland. Ergebnisse qualitativer und repräsentativer Zuschauerbefragungen. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
- Maio, G. R., & Esses, V. M. (2001). The need for affect: Individual differences in the motivation to approach and avoid emotions. Journal of Personality, 69(4), 583–615. Open Google Scholar
- Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. (2009). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Malatesta, C. Z., Izard, C. E., Culver, C., & Nicolich, M. (1987). Emotion communication skills in young, middle-aged, and older women. Psychology and Aging, 2(2), 193–203. Open Google Scholar
- Mandell, L., & Shaw, D. L. (1973). Judging people in the news–unconsciously: Effect of camera angle and bodily activity. Journal of Broadcasting, 17(3), 353–62. Open Google Scholar
- Marcinkowski, F., & Nieland, J. (2002). Medialisierung im politischen Mehrebenensystem: Eine Spurensuche im nordrhein-westfälischen Landtagswahlkampf. In U. Alemann & S. Marschall (eds.), Parteien in der Mediendemokratie (pp. 81–115). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E. (1988). The structure of emotional response: 1984 presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 737–61. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E. (2002). The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E. (2003). The psychology of emotions and politics. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy & R. Jervis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 182–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm, and the vote: The emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 672–85. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E., & MacKuen, M. B. (2001). Emotions and politics: The dynamic of emotionality. In J. H. Kuklinski (ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology (pp. 41–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, R. W. (2011). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. Political Psychology, 32(2), 323–36. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E., Neuman, R. W., & MacKuen, M. (eds.) (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Theiss-Morse, E., & Stevens, D. (2005). The emotional foundation of political cognition: The impact of extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26(6), 949–63. Open Google Scholar
- Markowitz-Elfassi, D., & Tsfati, Y. (2019). How does beauty shape political television news? The effect of Israeli politicians’ facial attractiveness on the tone of their news coverage. Journalism, 20(1), 1397–1414. Open Google Scholar
- Masch, L. (2020). Politicians’ expressions of anger and leadership evaluations: Empirical evidence from Germany. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Masch, L. & Gabriel, O.W. (2020). How emotional displays of political leaders shape citizens attitudes: The case of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. German Politics, 29(2), 158–79. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D. (1989). Nature of politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D. (1990). Candidate rhetoric, political leadership, and electoral success: The broader context of ‘pessimistic rumination’. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 65–8. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D. (1994). Differences in responses of black and whites to American leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences, 13(2), 183–94. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Gender and political cognition: Integrating evolutionary biology and political science. Politics and Life Sciences, 8(1), 3–39. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D., & Sullivan, D. G. (1989a). Nonverbal displays and political leadership in France and the United States. Political Behavior, 11(2), 123–56. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D., & Sullivan, D. G. (1989b). Facial displays and political leadership in France. Behavioural Processes, 19(1–3), 1–30. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D., & Sullivan, D. G. (1993). Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political information processing. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 150–82). Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Lanzetta, J. T., McHugo, G. J., & Englis, B. G. (1986). The facial displays of leaders: Toward and ethnology of human politics. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 9(4), 319–43. Open Google Scholar
- Masters, R. D., Sullivan, D. G., Feola, A., & McHugo, G. J. (1987). Television coverage of candidates’ display behavior during the 1984 Democratic primaries in the United States. International Political Science Review, 8(2), 121–30. Open Google Scholar
- Matthes, J. & Marquart, F. (2013). Werbung auf niedrigem Niveau? Publizistik, 58(3), 247–66. Open Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, D. (1992). American-Japanese cultural differences in the recognition of universal facial expressions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(1), 72–84. Open Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1989). American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 13(2), 143–57. Open Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, D., LeRoux, J., Wilson-Cohn, C., Raroque, J., Kooken, K., Ekman, P., Yrizarry, N., Loewinger, S., Uchida, H, Yee, A., Amo, L., & Goh, A. (2000). A new test to measure emotion recognition ability: Matsumoto and Ekman’s Japanese and Caucasian brief affect recognition Test (JACBART). Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24(3), 179–209. Open Google Scholar
- Maurer, M. (2007). Themen, Argumente, rhetorische Strategien: Die Inhalte des TV-Duells. In M. Maurer, C. Reinemann, J. Maier & M. Maier, Schröder gegen Merkel: Wahrnehmung und Wirkung des TV-Duells 2005 im Ost-West-Vergleich (pp. 33–52). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Maurer, M. (2016). Nonverbale politische Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Maurer, M., Reinemann, C., Maier, J. & Maier, M. (2007). Schröder gegen Merkel. Wahrnehmung und Wirkung des TV-Duells 2005 im Ost-West-Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Maurer, T. (2009). Fernsehen – als Quelle politischer Information überschätzt? Eine Bestandsaufnahme des Angebotes und der Nutzung des „politischen Leitmediums“. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (eds.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie (pp. 129–50). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Mayer, J. D., DiPaolo, M., & Salovey, P. (1990). Perceiving affective content in ambiguous visual stimuli: A component of emotional intelligence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 54(3–4), 772–81. Open Google Scholar
- Mayer, J. D., Gaschke, Y. N., Braverman, D. L., & Evans, T. W. (1992). Mood-congruent judgment is a general effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 119–32. Open Google Scholar
- Mayer, J. D., & Geher, G. (1996). Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion. Intelligence, 22(2), 89–113. Open Google Scholar
- Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability or eclectic traits? American Psychologist, 63(6), 503–17. Open Google Scholar
- Mayer, W. G. (1993). Poll trends: Trends in media usage. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57(4), 593–611. Open Google Scholar
- Mazzoleni, G. (1987). Media logic and party logic in campaign coverage: The Italian general election of 1983. European Journal of Communication, 2(1), 81–103. Open Google Scholar
- McCain, T. A., Chilberg, J., & Wakshlag, J. (1977). The effect of camera angle on source credibility and attraction. Journal of Broadcasting, 21(1), 35–46. Open Google Scholar
- McDermott, M. L. (1998). Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(4), 895–918. Open Google Scholar
- McDougall, W. (1926). An introduction to social psychology. Boston, MA: Luce. Open Google Scholar
- McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., & Bush, L. K. (1991). The effect of attitudes on emotional reactions to expressive display of political leaders. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15(1), 19–41. Open Google Scholar
- McHugo, G. J., Lanzetta, J. T., Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., & Englis, B. G. (1985). Emotional reactions to a political leader’s expressive displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1513–29. Open Google Scholar
- Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago, IL: Aldine-Atherton. Open Google Scholar
- Mehu, M., Grammer, K., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Smiles when sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 415–22. Open Google Scholar
- Mendolia, M., & Kleck, R. E. (1991). Watching people talk about their emotions: Inferences in response to full-face vs. profile expressions. Motivation and Emotion, 15(4), 229–42. Open Google Scholar
- Messaris, P., Eckman, B., & Gumpert, G. (1979). Editing structure in the televised versions of the 1976 presidential debates. Journal of Broadcasting, 23(3), 359–69. Open Google Scholar
- Mill, A., Allik, J., Realo, A., & Valk, R. (2009). Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: A cross-sectional study. Emotion, 9(5), 619–30. Open Google Scholar
- Miller, A. H., Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80(2), 521–40. Open Google Scholar
- Millerson, G. (1994). Video camera techniques (2nd edition). Oxford: Focal Press Open Google Scholar
- Millerson, G. (2001). Video production handbook (3rd edition). New York, NY: Focal Press. Open Google Scholar
- Millerson, G., & Owens, J. (2008). Video production handbook (4th edition). Burlington, VT: Focal Press. Open Google Scholar
- Moeller, S. D. (1999). Compassion fatigue: How the media sell disease, famine, war and death. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Montagne, B., Kessels, R. P., Frigerio, E., de Haan, E. H., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Sex differences in the perception of affective facial expressions: Do men really lack emotional sensitivity? Cognitive Processing, 6(2), 136–41. Open Google Scholar
- Moreno, C., Borod, J. C., Welkowitz, J., & Alpert, M. (1993). The perception of facial emotion across the adult life span. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9(3–4), 305–14. Open Google Scholar
- Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. NewYork, NY: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
- Mutz, D. C. (2007). Effects of “in-your-face” television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 621–35. Open Google Scholar
- Mutz, D. C. (2015). In-your-face-politics: The consequences of uncivil media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. Open Google Scholar
- Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–47. Open Google Scholar
- Nagel, F. (2012). Die Wirkung verbaler und nonverbaler Kommunikation in TV-Duellen: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Gerhard Schröder und Angela Merkel. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Nagel, F., Maurer, M., & Reinemann, C. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 833–50. Open Google Scholar
- Nai, A. (2021). Fear and loathing in populist campaigns? Comparing the communication style of populists and non-populists in elections worldwide. Journal of Political Marketing, 20(2), 219–50. Open Google Scholar
- Nai, A., & Maier, J. (2021). The wrath of candidates: Drivers of fear and enthusiasm appeals in election campaigns across the globe. Journal of Political Marketing. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2021.1930327 Open Google Scholar
- Neblo, M. A. (2007). Philosophical psychology with political interest. In R. W. Neuman, G. Marcus, A. Cigler & M. MacKuen (eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 25–47). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Neuman, R. W., Marcus, G., Cigler, A., & MacKuen, M. (2007a). Theorizing affects effect. In R. W. Neuman, G. Marcus, A. Cigler & M. MacKuen (eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 1–20). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Neuman, R. W., Marcus, G., Cigler, A., & MacKuen, M. (eds.). (2007b). The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Newhagen, J. E., & Reeves, B. (1991). Emotion and memory responses for negative political advertising: A study of television commercials used in the 1988 presidential election. In F. Biocca (ed.), Television and political advertising (pp. 197–220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Newton, J. S., Masters, R. D., McHugo, G. J., & Sullivan, D. G. (1987). Making up our minds: Effects of network coverage on viewer impression of leaders. Polity, 20(2), 226–46. Open Google Scholar
- Nielsen (2018). Time flies: U.S. adults now spend nearly half a day interacting with media. Retrieved from https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/time-flies-us-adults-now-spend-nearly-half-a-day-interacting-with-media.html Open Google Scholar
- Oatley, K., & Jenkins, J. M. (1996). Understanding emotions. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
- Oatley, K. (2009). Creative expression and communication of emotions in the visual and narrative arts. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith(eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 481–502). Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1987). Towards a cognitive theory of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 1, 29-50. Open Google Scholar
- Ohr, D. (2020). Kandidatenorientierungen und Wahlentscheidung. In T. Faas, O. W. Gabriel & J. Maier (eds.), Politikwissenschaftliche Einstellungs- und Verhaltensforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium (pp. 480–501). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Ohr, D., Klein, M., & Rosar, U. (2013). Bewertung der Kanzlerkandidaten und Wahlentscheidung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In B. Weßels, H. Schoen & O. W. Gabriel (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2009 (pp. 206–30). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Ohr, D., & Oscarsson, H. (2011). Leader traits, leader image and vote choice. In K. Aarts, A. Blais & H. Schmitt (eds), Political leaders and democratic elections (pp. 187–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97(3), 315–31. Open Google Scholar
- Ottati, V. C., Terkildsen, N., & Hubbard, C. (1997). Happy faces elicit heuristic processing in a televised impression formation task: A cognitive tuning approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(11), 1144–56. Open Google Scholar
- Owens, J., & Millerson, G. (2012). Television production (15th edition). New York, NY: Focal Press. Open Google Scholar
- Panksepp, J. (1982). Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 407–67. Open Google Scholar
- Pantti, M. (2010). The value of emotion: An examination of television journalists’ notions on emotionality. European Journal of Communication, 25(2), 168–81. Open Google Scholar
- Parry, G. (1976). Trust, distrust, and consensus. British Journal of Political Science, 6(1), 129–42. Open Google Scholar
- Patterson, T. E., & McClure, R. (1976). The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics. New York, NY: Putnam. Open Google Scholar
- Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York, NY: Vintage. Open Google Scholar
- Patzer, G. L. (1985). The physical attractiveness phenomena. New York, NY: Plenum. Open Google Scholar
- Peffley, M. A., & Hurwitz, J. (1985). A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 871–90. Open Google Scholar
- Perloff, R. M. (1998). Political communication: Politics, press, and public in America. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait emotional intelligence: Behavioural validation in two studies of emotion recognition and reactivity to mood induction. European Journal of Personality, 17(1), 39–57. Open Google Scholar
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In R. E. Petty & J. T. Cacioppo (eds.), Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center (2013). 12 trends shaping digital news. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/10/16/12-trends-shaping-digital-news/ Open Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center (2018). Party identification trend, 1992-2017. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2018/03/20/party-identification-trends-1992-2017/. Open Google Scholar
- Pfetsch, B. (1996). Convergence through privatization? Changing media environments and televised politics in Germany. European Journal of Communication, 11(4), 427–51. Open Google Scholar
- Pfetsch, B. (1998). Regierungen unter den Bedingungen medialer Allgegenwart. In U. Sarcinelli (ed.), Politikvermittlung und Demokratie in der Mediengesellschaft (pp. 233–52). Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Plasser, F. (2005). From hard to soft news standards? How political journalists in different media systems evaluate the shifting quality of news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(2), 47–68. Open Google Scholar
- Plasser, F., & Plasser, G. (2002). Global political campaigning: A worldwide analysis of campaign professionals and their practices. Westport, CT: Praeger. Open Google Scholar
- Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (eds.), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience (Vol. 1, pp. 3-31). New York, NY: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar
- Plutchik, R. E., & Conte, H. R. (1997). Circumplex models of personality and emotions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Open Google Scholar
- Pontzen, D. (2006). Nur Bild, BamS und Glotze? Medialisierung der Politik aus Sicht der Akteure. Hamburg: LIT. Open Google Scholar
- Pontzen, D. (2013). Politiker in der Medialisierungspirale? Eine Abgeordnetenbefragung auf Landes-, Bundes- und EU-Ebene. Marburg: Tectum Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential elections. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Power, M., & Dalgleish, T. (2008). Cognition and emotion: From order to disorder (2nd edition). Hove/New York, NY: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar
- Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Provine, R. R. (1992). Contagious laughter: Laughter is a sufficient stimulus for laughs and smiles. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30(1), 1–4. Open Google Scholar
- Quintilian (2015). Institutes of oratory, or, education of an orator. Mountain View, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Open Google Scholar
- Rahn, W. M. (2000). Affect as information: The role of public mood in political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins & S. L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 130–50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Rahn, W. M., Aldrich, J. H., Borgida, E. & Sullivan, J. L. (1990). A social-cognitive model of candidate appraisal. In J. A. Ferejohn & J. H. Kuklinski (eds.), Information and democratic processes (pp. 136–59). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Open Google Scholar
- Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). Feeling politics: New research into emotion and politics. In D. P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
- Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J. W., & Lau, R. R. (2007). Affective intelligence and voting: Information processing and learning in a campaign. In G. E. Marcus, R. W. Neuman & M. MacKuen (eds.), Affective intelligence and political judgment (pp. 152–79). Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Redlawsk, D. P., & Lau, R. R. (2013). Behavioral decision-making. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears & J. S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd edition, pp. 130–64). Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Open Google Scholar
- Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., & Scherr, S. (2017). Hard and soft news. In C. H. de Vreese, F. Esser & D. N. Hopmann (eds.), Comparing political journalism (pp. 131–49). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Remington, N. E., Fabrigar, L. R., & P. S. Visser (2000). Reexamining the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 286–300. Open Google Scholar
- Rennels, J. L., & Kayl, A. J. (2015). Differences in expressivity based on attractiveness: Target or perceiver effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 163–72. Open Google Scholar
- Renner, A. M. (2019). Should female politicians avoid appearing emotions? Gender-specific effects of Politicians’ emotions on the attribution of competence and warmth. Politische Psychologie, 7(1), 112–32. Open Google Scholar
- Ridout, T. N., & Searles, K. (2011). It’s my campaign I’ll cry if I want to: How and when campaigns use emotional appeals. Political Psychology, 32(3), 439–58. Open Google Scholar
- Riediger, M., Voelkle, M. C., Ebner, N. C., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Beyond “happy, angry, or sad?” Age-of-poser and age-of-rater effects on multi-dimensional emotion perception. Cognition and Emotion, 25(6), 968–82. Open Google Scholar
- Riffe, D., Aust, C. F., & Lacy, S. R. (1993). The effectiveness of random, consecutive day and constructed week sampling in newspaper content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 70(1), 133–9. Open Google Scholar
- Riggio, H. R., & Riggio, R. E. (2010). Appearance-based trait inferences and voting: Evolutionary roots and implications for leadership. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 119–25. Open Google Scholar
- Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Rogin, M. (1969). Politics, emotions, and the Wallace vote. British Journal of Sociology, 20(1), 27-49. Open Google Scholar
- Romano, S. T., & Bordieri, J. E. (1989). Physical attractiveness stereotypes and students’ perceptions of college professors. Psychological Reports, 64(3), 1099–1102. Open Google Scholar
- Rosar, U., Klein, M., & Beckers, T. (2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 64–79. Open Google Scholar
- Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 11–36. Open Google Scholar
- Roseman, I. J, Abelson, R. & Ewing, M. F. (1986). Emotion and political cognition: Emotional appeals in political communication. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (eds.), Political Cognition (pp. 279–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Roseman, I. J., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 899–915. Open Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. J. (1960). A structural theory of attitude dynamics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 319–40. Open Google Scholar
- Rössler, P., Marquart, F., Kerstin, J., & Bomhoff, J. (2009). Die Erhebung von Fotonachrichtenfaktoren im journalistischen Alltag: Wie selektieren Bildredakteure Pressefotos? Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the German Communication Association (DGPuK). Berlin. Open Google Scholar
- Roßteutscher, S., & Scherer, P. (2014). Ideologie. In R. Schmitt-Beck, H. Rattinger, S. Roßteutscher, B. Weßels, C. Wolf, I. Bieber, M. S. Blumenberg, J. E. Blumenstiel, T. Faas, A. Förster, H. Giebler, I. Glogger, T. Gummer, S. Huber, M. Krewel, P. Lamers, J. Maier, J. Partheymüller, T. Plischke, J. Roßmann, A. Schäfer, P. Scherer, M. Steinbrecher, A. Wagner, & E. Wiegand, Zwischen Fragmentierung und Konzentration: Die Bundestagswahl 2013. (pp. 213–23). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Rotter, N. G., & Rotter, G. S. (1988). Sex differences in the encoding and decoding of negative facial emotions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(2), 139–48. Open Google Scholar
- Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743–62. Open Google Scholar
- Ruffman, T., Henry, J. D., Livingstone, V., & Phillips, L. H. (2008). A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32(4), 863–81. Open Google Scholar
- Ruhrmann, G., & Göbbel, R. (2007). Veränderung der Nachrichtenfaktoren und Auswirkungen auf die journalistische Praxis in Deutschland: Abschlussbericht für Netzwerk Recherche e.V. Retrieved from https://netzwerkrecherche.org/files/nr-studie-nachrichtenfaktoren.pdf Open Google Scholar
- Ruhrmann, G., Woelke, J., Maier, M., & Diehlmann, N. (2003). Der Wert von Nachrichten im deutschen Fernsehen: Ein Modell zur Validierung von Nachrichtenfaktoren (pp. 99–144). Opladen: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Runge, T. E., Frey, D., Gollwitzer, P. M., Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 12(2), 142–62. Open Google Scholar
- Russel, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–78. Open Google Scholar
- Russell, J. A., & Barrett, F. L. (1999). Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: Dissecting the elephant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 805–19. Open Google Scholar
- Russell, J. A., & Bullock, M. (1987). Fuzzy concepts and the perception of emotion in facial expressions. Social Cognition, 4(3), 309–41. Open Google Scholar
- Rychlowska, M., Manstead, A. S. R., & van der Schalk, J. (2019). The many faces of smiles. In U. Hess & S. Hareli (eds.), The social nature of emotion expression: What emotions can tell us about world (pp. 227–45). Cham: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar
- Sande, Ø. (1971). The perception of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 8(3–4), 221–37. Open Google Scholar
- Sasson, N. J., Pinkham, A. E., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2010). Controlling for response biases clarifies sex and age differences in facial affect recognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(4), 207–21. Open Google Scholar
- Scacco, J. M., & Coe, K. (2017). Acting “presidential”: The modern campaign meets the ubiquitous presidency. In R. E. Denton (ed.), Political campaign communication: Theory, method and practice (pp. 303–26). New York, NY: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
- Scammell, M., & Langer, A. I. (2006). Political advertising: Why is it so boring? Media, Culture & Society, 28(5), 763–84. Open Google Scholar
- Schaal, G. S. (2010). Der emotive turn in der Politikwissenschaft. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 39(2), 139–40. Open Google Scholar
- Schaefer, R. J. (1997). Edition strategies in television news documentaries. Journal of Communication, 47(4), 69–88. Open Google Scholar
- Schatz, H., Immer, N., & Marcinkowski, F. (1989). Der Vielfalt eine Chance? Empirische Befunde zu einem zentralen Argument für die Dualisierung des Rundfunks in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 37(1), 6–24. Open Google Scholar
- Scheff, T. (2015). Toward defining basic emotions. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(2), 111–21. Open Google Scholar
- Schemer, C. (2009). Politische Kampagnen für Herz und Verstand. Affektive und kognitive Einflüsse der Massenmedien auf politische Einstellungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Schemer, C. (2010). Der affektive Einfluss von politischer Werbung in Kampagnen auf Einstellungen. Medien and Kommunikationswissenschaft, 58(2), 227–46. Open Google Scholar
- Schemer, C., & Schäfer, A. (2020). Psychophysiologische Messungen. In T. Faas, O. W. Gabriel & J. Maier (eds.), Politikwissenschaftliche Einstellungs- und Verhaltensforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium (pp. 681–98). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
- Scherer, K. R. (2001). Emotion. In M. Hewstone, & W. Stroebe (eds.), Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective (pp. 151–95). Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
- Scherer, K. R., (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695–729. Open Google Scholar
- Scheufele, B., & Gasteiger, C. (2007). Berichterstattung, Emotionen und politische Legitimierung: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zum Einfluss der Politikberichterstattung auf die Legitimierung politischer Entscheidungen am Beispiel von Bundeswehreinsätzen. Medien & Kommunikation, 55(4), 534–54. Open Google Scholar
- Schlater, R. (1970). Effect of speed of presentation on recall of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting, 14(2), 207–14. Open Google Scholar
- Schoen, H. (2004). Kandidatenorientierungen im Wahlkampf: Eine Analyse zu den Bundestagswahlkämpfen 1980–1998. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 45(3), 321–45. Open Google Scholar
- Schoen, H. (2006). Beeinflusst Angst politische Einstellungen? Eine Analyse der öffentlichen Meinung während des Golfkriegs 1991. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 47(3), 441–64. Open Google Scholar
- Schoenewolf, G. (1990). Emotional contagion: Behavioral induction in individuals and groups. Modern Psychoanalysis, 15(1), 49–61. Open Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. (1990). Feeling as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective States. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527–61). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In J. Forgas (ed.), Emotions and social judgment (pp. 55–71). Oxford: Pergamon Press. Open Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In K. Fiedler & J. Forgas (eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Toronto: Hogrefe. Open Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. & Kurz, E. (1989). What’s in a picture? The impact of face-ism on trait attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19(4), 311–16. Open Google Scholar
- Seiter, J. S., Weger, H., Kinzer, H. J. & Jensen Sandry, A. (2009). Impression management in televised debates: The effect of background nonverbal behavior on audience perceptions of debaters’ likeability. Communication Research Reports, 26(1), 1–11. Open Google Scholar
- Shields, S. A. (2005). The politics of emotion in everyday life: “Appropriate” emotion and claims on identity. Review of General Psychology, 9(1), 3–15. Open Google Scholar
- Shields, S. A., & MacDowell, K. A. (1987). “Appropriate” emotion in politics: Judgments of a televised debate. Journal of Communication, 37(2), 78–89. Open Google Scholar
- Shimanoff, S. B. (1985). Expressing emotions in words: Verbal patterns of interaction. Journal of Communication, 35(3), 16–31. Open Google Scholar
- Sides, J., Shaw, D., Grossmann, M., & Lipsitz, K. (2015). Campaigns and elections (2nd edition). New York, NY: W. W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
- Singer, J. A., & Salovey, P. (1988). Mood and memory: Evaluating the network theory of affect. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(2), 211–51. Open Google Scholar
- Sniderman, P. M. (2002). Taking sides. A fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins & S. L. Popkin (eds.), Elements of reason. Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 67–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Spezio, M. L., & Adolphs, R. (2007). Emotional processing and political judgement: Towards integrating political psychology and decision neuroscience. In R. W. Neuman, G. Marcus, A. Crigler & M. MacKuen (eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 71–95). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Spier, T. (2011). Welche politischen Einstellungen haben die Mitglieder der Parteien? In T. Spier, M. Klein, U. von Alemann, H. Hoffmann, A. Laux, A. Nonnenmacher & K. Rohrbach (eds.), Parteimitglieder in Deutschland. (pp. 121–37). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Sporer, S. L. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 36–97. Open Google Scholar
- Staab, J. F. (1998). Faktoren aktueller Berichterstattung: Die Nachrichtenwert-Theorie und ihre Anwendung auf das Fernsehen. In K. Kamps & M. Meckel (eds.), Fernsehnachrichten: Prozesse, Strukturen, Funktionen (pp. 49–64), Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Stapelton, C. & Dawkins, E. R. (2022). Catching my anger: How political elites create angrier citizens. Political Research Quarterly, 75(3), 754-765. Open Google Scholar
- statista (2018). Average daily TV viewing time per person in selected countries worldwide in 2016 (in minutes). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/276748/average-daily-tv-viewing-time-per-person-in-selected-countries/ Open Google Scholar
- Steenbergen, M. R., & C. Ellis (2006). Fear and loathing in American election: Context, traits, and negative candidate effect. In D. P. Redlawsk (ed.), Feeling politics: Emotions in political information processing (pp. 109–33). New York, NY: Palgrave. Open Google Scholar
- Stewart, P. A., Bucy, E. P., & Mehu, M. (2015). Strengthening bonds and connecting with followers: A biobehavioral inventory of political smiles. Politics and the Life Sciences, 34(1), 73–92. Open Google Scholar
- Stewart, P. A., & Dowe, P. K. F. (2013). Interpreting president Barack Obama’s facial displays of emotions: Revisiting the Dartmouth Group. Political Psychology, 34(3), 369–85. Open Google Scholar
- Stewart, P. A., Waller, B. M., & Schubert, J. N. (2009). Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion, 33(2), 125–35. Open Google Scholar
- Strongman, K. T. (2003). The psychology of emotions: From everyday life to theory (5th edition). Chichester: Wiley. Open Google Scholar
- Stroud, L. R., Glaser, J., & Salovey, P. (2005). The effects of partisanship and candidate emotionality on voter preference. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(1), 25–44. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, D. G. (1996). Emotional response to the nonverbal behaviour of French and American political leaders. Political Behavior, 18(3), 311–25. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1987). “Gut reactions” and the political effects of the media. PS: Political Science & Politics, 20(4), 880–9. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, D. G., & Masters, R. D. (1988). Happy warriors: Leaders’ facial display, viewers’ emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 345–68. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, D. G. & Masters, R. D. (1993). Nonverbal behavior and leadership: Emotion and cognition in political information processing. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 150–82). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, D. G., Masters, R. D., Lanzetta, J. T., McHugo, G. J., Englis, B. G., & Plate, E. F. (1991). Facial displays and political leadership: Some experimental findings. In G. Schubert & R. D. Masters (eds.), Primate politics (pp. 188–206). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, S., & Ruffman, T. (2004a). Emotion recognition deficits in the elderly. International Journal of Neuroscience, 114(3), 403–32. Open Google Scholar
- Sullivan, S., & Ruffman, T. (2004b). Social understanding: How does it fare with advancing years? British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 1–18. Open Google Scholar
- Suzuki, A., Hoshino, T., Shigemasu, K., & Kawamura, M. (2007). Decline or improvement? Age-related differences in facial expression recognition. Biological psychology, 74(1), 75–84. Open Google Scholar
- Sye, T., Coté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leaders’ mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295–305. Open Google Scholar
- Tedesco, J. C. (2002). Televised political advertising effects. Evaluating responses during the 2000 Robb-Allen Senatorial election. Journal of Advertising, 31(1), 37–48. Open Google Scholar
- Tedesco, J. C., & Kaid, L. L. (2003). Style and effects of the Bush and Gore spots. In L. L. Kaid, J. C. Tedesco, D. G. Bystrom, M. S. McKinney (eds.), The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign (pp. 5–16). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
- Tenscher, J. (2010). Salto mediale? Medialisierung aus der Perspektive deutscher Landtagsabgeordneter. In M. Edinger & W. J. Patzelt (eds.), Politik als Beruf (pp. 375–95). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Terhorst, S. (2012). Sprachstrategien und Rollen politischer Akteure in der parlamentarischen Arena: Eine Inhaltsanalyse am Beispiel der Haushaltsdebatten in Nordrhein-Westfalen zwischen 2000 und 2001 (doctoral thesis). Retrieved from https://duepublico.uni-duisburg-essen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-31258/Terhorst_Diss.pdf Open Google Scholar
- Terracciano, A., Merritt, M., Zonderman, A. B., & Evans, M. K. (2003). Personality traits and sex differences in emotion recognition among African Americans and Caucasians. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1000, 309–12. Open Google Scholar
- Thayer, J., & Johnsen, B. H. (2000). Sex differences in judgement of facial affect: A multivariate analysis of recognition errors. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 243–6. Open Google Scholar
- The Media Insight Project (2014). The personal news cycle. Retrieved from http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/The_Media_Insight_Project_The_Personal_News_Cycle_Final.pdf Open Google Scholar
- Theiss-Morse, E., & Barton, D. G. (2017). Emotion, cognition, and political trust. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 160–75). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
- Thibault, P., Bourgeois, P., & Hess, U. (2006). The effect of group-identification on emotion recognition: The case of cats and basketball players. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 676–83. Open Google Scholar
- Thomassen, J. J. (ed.) (2014). Elections and democracy: Representation and accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Thompson, R. & Bowen, C. J. (2009). Grammar of the shot (2nd edition). Oxford: Elsevier. Open Google Scholar
- Thompson, A. E., & Voyer, D. (2014). Sex differences in the ability to recognise non-verbal displays of emotion: A meta-analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 28(7), 1164–95. Open Google Scholar
- Thorsen, E., Christ, W. G., & Caywood, C. (1991). Effects of issue-image strategies, attack and support appeals, music, and visual content in political commercials. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35(4), 465–86. Open Google Scholar
- Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 86–94. Open Google Scholar
- Tiemens, R. K. (1970). Some relationship of camera angle to communicator credibility. Journal of Broadcasting 14(4), 483–90. Open Google Scholar
- Tiemens, R. K. (2005). A content analysis of political speeches on TV. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis & K. Kenney (eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 385–404). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
- Tiemens, R. K., Sillars, M. O., Alexander, D. C., & Werling, D. (1988). Television coverage of Jesse Jacksons speech to the 1984 Democratic National Convention. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 32(1), 1–22. Open Google Scholar
- Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 208–24. Open Google Scholar
- Todorov, A., Baron, S. G., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Evaluating face trustworthiness: A model based approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(2), 119–27. Open Google Scholar
- Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813–33. Open Google Scholar
- Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, and consciousness: The positive affects (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Springer. Open Google Scholar
- Tomkins, S. S. (1984). Affect theory. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 163-195). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Open Google Scholar
- Torcal, M. (2017). Political trust in Western and Southern Europe. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 418–39). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
- Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2008). The automaticity of emotion recognition. Emotion, 8(1), 81–95. Open Google Scholar
- Tyler, T. R. (2001). The psychology of dissatisfaction with government. In J. R. Hibbing & E. Theiss-Morse (eds.), What is it about government that Americans dislike? (pp. 227–42). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Umbricht, A., & Esser, F. (2017). The push to popularize politics: Understanding the audience-friendly packaging of political news in six media systems since the 1960s. Journalism Studies, 17(1), 100–21. Open Google Scholar
- Uslaner, E. M. (ed.) (2018). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- van Deth, J. W. (2000). Das Leben, nicht die Politik ist wichtig. In O. Niedermayer & B. Westle (eds.), Demokratie und Partizipation (pp. 115–35). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar
- van Ham, C., Thomassen. J., Aarts, K. & Andweg, R. (eds.) (2017). Myth and reality of the legitimacy crisis. Explaining trends and cross-national differences in established democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–8. Open Google Scholar
- van Kleef, G. A. (2016). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion: Towards an integrative theory of emotions as social information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Van Remoortere, A., Walgrave, S., & Vliegenthart, R. (2023). Mass media occurrence as a political career maker. International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 201–18. Open Google Scholar
- Vetter, A., & Brettschneider, F. (1998). Idealmaße für Kanzlerkandidaten. ZUMA-Nachrichten, 43, 90–115. Open Google Scholar
- Völkl, K. (2009). Der Einfluss der Bundespolitik auf die Stimmabgabe der Bürger bei Landtagswahlen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stärke der Parteibindung. In O. W. Gabriel, B. Weßels & J. W. Falter (eds.), Wahlen und Wähler. Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2005 (pp. 480–96). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar
- Vos, D. (2013). The vertical glass ceiling: Explaining female politicians’ underrepresentation in television news. Communications, 38(4), 389–410. Open Google Scholar
- Vuoskoski, J. K., & Eerola, T. (2011). The role of mood and personality in the perception of emotions represented by music. Cortex, 47(9), 1099–1106. Open Google Scholar
- Wagner, H. L., MacDonald, C. J., & Manstead, A. S. (1986). Communication of individual emotions by spontaneous facial expressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 737–43. Open Google Scholar
- Waismel-Manor, I., & Tsfati, Y. (2011). Why do better-looking members of Congress receive more television coverage? Political Communication, 28(4), 440–63. Open Google Scholar
- Wang, L., Restubog, S., Shao, B., Vinh, L., & van Kleef, G. (2018). Does anger expression help or harm leader effectiveness? The role of competence-based versus integrity-based violations and abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1050–72. Open Google Scholar
- Warren, M. (2017). What kinds of trust does a democracy need. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G.van der Meer (eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 33–52). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
- Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
- Watzlawick, P., Beavin Bavelas, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. Open Google Scholar
- Way, B. M., & Masters, R. D. (1996). Political attitudes: Interactions of cognition and affect. Motivation and Cognition, 20(3), 205–36. Open Google Scholar
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar
- Weber, C. (2013). Emotions, campaigns, and political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 414–28. Open Google Scholar
- Weiner, B., & Graham, S. (1984). An attributional approach to emotional development. In C. E. Izard, J. Kagan & R. B. Zajonc (eds.), Emotions, cognitions, and behavior (pp. 167–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Weischenberg, S., Malik, M., & Scholl, A. (2006). Die Souffleure der Mediengesellschaft: Report über die Journalisten in Deutschland. Konstanz: UVK. Open Google Scholar
- Williams, L. M., Mathersul, D., Palmer, D. M., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., & Gordon, E. (2009). Explicit identification and implicit recognition of facial emotions: I. Age effects in males and females across 10 decades. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(3), 257–77. Open Google Scholar
- Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First Impressions: “Making up Your Mind after a 100-ms Exposure to a Face Source”. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–8. Open Google Scholar
- Wundt, W. (1907). Grundzüge der Psychologie. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann. Open Google Scholar
- Yarwood, M. (2022). Psychology of human emotion. An open access textbook. State College, PA: Pensylvania State University. Retrieved from https://psu.pb.unizin.org/psych425/ Open Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1–27. Open Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151–75. Open Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39(2), 117–23. Open Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, S., & L. Gardner (eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 591–632). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 31–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Zajonc, R. B. (2008). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. In R. H. Fazio & R. E. Petty (eds.), Attitudes: Their structure, function, and consequences (pp. 151–75). New York, NY/Hove: Psychology Press. Open Google Scholar
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
- Zettl, H. (2011). Television production handbook (11th edition). Boston, MA: Wadsworth. Open Google Scholar
- Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2017). Objects of political and social trust: Scales and hierarchies. In S. Zmerli & T. W. G. van der Meer (eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 104–24). Cheltenham/Northhampton: Elgar. Open Google Scholar
- Zmerli, S. & van der Meer, T. W. G. (eds.) (2017). Handbook on political trust. Cheltenham/Northampton: Elgar. Open Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, M., Lipets, M. S., Koivumaki, J. H., & Rosenthal, R. (1975). Encoding and decoding nonverbal cues of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1068–76. Open Google Scholar
- Zullow, H. M., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1990). Pessimistic rumination predicts defeat of presidential candidates, 1900 to 1984. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 52–61. Open Google Scholar





