Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Volume Open Access Full access

Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Authors:
Journal:
ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Publisher:
 2019

Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print
1435-439X
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
German
Product type
Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 335 - 336
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 337 - 348
The relationship between the rule of law and international investment law is the focus of the ILA Committee on the Rule of Law and International Investment Law. The term rule of law has no clearly defined and universally accepted meaning. While...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 349 - 368
This article highlights the importance of the rule of law for the functioning of the multilateral trading system. It argues that two of its main components are in danger: the recognition by the WTO Member states that they undertake in good faith not...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 369 - 382
The article focuses on “rule of law” notions in human rights law. It analyses the different ways the European Court of Human Rights has made use of the “rule of law” in its case law. This becomes particularly visible in the use of the...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 383 - 406
Rule of law is considered as a constitutional principle of the European Union (EU) which is the basis for both internal and external actions of the Union. The European Commission as the guardian of the treaties has a key role in ensuring adherence...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 407 - 428
Legal analysis of sovereign debt restructuring highlights adherence to the Rule of Law standards by debtor-states, creditors and major international financial organizations. Without prejudice to great value of such works, they offer only a...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 429 - 476
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 22 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Open Access Full access

Page 477 - 502
Criticisms to investment arbitration persist and currently the discussions pertaining possible reforms to Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) are being held on a multilateral level at UNCITRAL. Among the options, a Multilateral Investment Court...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)

Bibliography (300)

  1. ALLAN, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, Oxford, 2001 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  2. ALLOTT, PHILIP, Towards the International Rule of Law: Essays in Integrated Constitutional Theory, London, 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  3. ALVAREZ, JOSÉ E., International Organizations and the Rule of Law, Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper, 2016, vol. 4 (Global Administrative Law Series Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  4. BEAULAC, STÉPHANE, The Rule of Law in International Law Today, in: Palombella, Gianluigi; Walker, Neil (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law, Oxford/Portland, 2009, pp. 197-204 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  5. BERMAN, HAROLD, Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition, Vol. I., Cambridge, MA/London, 1983 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  6. BINGHAM, TOM, The Rule of Law, London, 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  7. BROWNLIE, IAN, The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations, The Hague/London/Boston, 1998 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  8. CAMERON, LINDESY; EVERLY, REBECCA, Conceptualizing the Administration of Territory by International Actors, European Journal of International Law, 2010, vol. 21(1), pp. 221-244 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  9. CHESTERMAN, SIMON, An International Rule of Law, American Journal of Comparative Law, 2008, vol. 56(2), pp. 331-361 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  10. CRAIG, PAUL, Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework, in: Bellamy, Richard (ed.), The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers, Farnham, 2005, pp. 467-487 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  11. DICEY, ALBERT VENN, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Pt II, London, 1885 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  12. DYZENHAUS, DAVID, Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order, Portland, 1999 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  13. ECHANDI, ROBERTO, What Do Developing Countries Expect from the International Investment Regime?, in: Alvarez, José E.; Sauvant, Karl P.; Ahmed, Kamil Gérard; Vizcamno, Gabriela P. (eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options, Oxford, 2011, pp. 3-21 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  14. EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION), Report on the Rule of Law, adopted at its 86th plenary session, Study No. 512 / 2009, CDL-AD(2011)003rev, Strasbourg, 4 April 2011, available at: www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e (30/04/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  15. FARRAL, JEREMY MATAM, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  16. FLORES, IMER B.; HIMMA, KENNETH (eds.), Law, Liberty and the Rule of Law, Dordrecht, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  17. GROTE, RAINER, Rule of Law, Rechtsstaat and “Etat de droit”, in: Starck, Christian (ed.), Constitutionalism, Universalism and Democracy – a comparative analysis, Baden-Baden, 1999, pp. 269–306 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  18. HIGGINS, ROSALYN, The Rule of Law: Some Sceptical Thoughts, in: Higgins, Rosalyn (ed.), Themes and Theories: Selected Essays, Speeches, and Writings in International Law, Vol. 1, Oxford, 2009, pp. 1330 – 1340 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  19. ILA COMMITTEE on ‘Rule of Law and International Investment Law’ mandate in its committee description available at: www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1056 (30/04/2019). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  20. KEITH, KENNETH J., The International Rule of Law, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2015, vol. 28(3), pp. 403-417 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  21. KELSEN, HANS, Pure Theory of Law, Clark, New Jersey, 1970 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  22. KINGSBURY, BENEDICT, International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order, in: Crawford, James; Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 203-227 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  23. KOSKENNIEMI, MARTTI, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960, Cambridge, 2001 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  24. MCCORQUODALE, ROBERT, Defining the International Rule of Law: Defying Gravity?, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2016, vol. 65(2), pp. 277-304 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  25. PALOMBELLA, GIANLUIGI, The Rule of Law and its Core, in: Palombella, Gianluigi; Walker, Neil (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law, Oxford/Portland, 2009, 17-42 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  26. PAULSSON, JAN, Denial of Justice in International Law, Cambridge, 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  27. RAZ, JOSEPH, The Authority of Law, Oxford, 1979 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  28. SATTOROVA, MALVUDA, International Investment Treaties and the Promise of Good Governance: Norm and Institutional Design, Internalisation, and Domestic Rule-Making, in: Reinisch, August; Footer, Mary E.; Binder, Christina (eds.), International Law and… Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Oxford, 2016, pp. 131-148 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  29. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law, Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 2006, vol. 6 (Global Administrative Law Series) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  30. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law, in: Stephan W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public, Oxford, 2010, pp. 151-183 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  31. SCHNEIDERMAN, DAVID, Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise, Cambridge, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  32. TAMANAHA, BRIAN Z., On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge, 2004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  33. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Rule of Law at the National and International Levels, A/RES/67/1, 30 November 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  34. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Declaration on Principles of International Law Friendly Relations and Cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, A/RES/2625(XXV), 24 October 1970 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  35. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Millennium Declaration, A/RES/55/2, 18 September 2000 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  36. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels, A/RES/69/123, 18 December 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  37. UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, A/RES/3/217A, 10 December 1948 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  38. UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, S/2004/616, 23 August 2004. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  39. VAN HARTEN, GUS, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford, 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  40. VAN HARTEN, GUS, Investment Treaty Arbitration, Procedural Fairness, and the Rule of Law, in: Schill, Stephan W. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford, 2010, pp. 627-658 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  41. WAIBEL, MICHAEL; KAUSHAL, ASHA; CHUNG, KYO-HW; BALCHIN, CLAIRE (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  42. WALDRON, JEREMY, The Law, London/New York, 1990 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  43. WATTS, ARTHUR, The International Rule of Law, German Yearbook of International Law 1993, 1994, vol. 36, pp. 15-45 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  44. ZURN, MICHAEL; NOLLKAEMPER, ANDRE; PEERENBOOM, RANDY (eds.), Rule of Law Dynamics in an Era of International and Transnational Governance, Cambridge, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
  45. ANDERSON, SCOTT; FRIEDBACHER, TODD; LAU, CHRISTIAN; LOCKHART, NICOLAS; REMY, JAN YVES; SANDFORD, IAIN, Using Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU to Ensure the Availability of Appeals, CTEI Working Paper CTEI-2017-17, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  46. BHATIA, SINGH, The Problems of Plenty, Challenging Times for the WTO’s Dispute Settlement System, available at: https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/ab_08jun17_e.pdf (14/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  47. BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, LAURENCE, Arbitration at the WTO: A Terra Incognita to be Further Explored, in: Charnovitz, Steve; Steger, Debra P; Van den Bossche, Peter (eds.), Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano, Cambridge, 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  48. DAVEY, WILLIAM, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years, Journal of International Economic Law, 2005, vol. 8, pp. 17-50 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  49. GREENWALD, JOHN, A Comparison of WTO and CIT/CAFC Jurisprudence in Review of U.S. Commerce Department Decisions in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 2013, vol. 21, pp. 261-272 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  50. GREENWALD, JOHN, WTO Dispute Settlement: an Exercise in Trade Law Legislation?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 113-124, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/6.1.113 (14/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  51. HAHN, MICHAEL, For Whom the Bell Tolls: The WTO’s Third Decade, in: Elsig, Manfred; Hahn, Michael; Spilker, Gabriele (eds.), The shifting landscape of global trade governance, Cambridge, pp. 121-154 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  52. HAHN, MICHAEL, We'll Always have Geneva: The Existential Crisis of the US-led Multilateral Trading System and the EU Reactions, in: Govaere, Inge; Garben, Sacha, The Interface between EU and International Law, 2019, pp. 269-292 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  53. HOWSE, ROBERT, The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary, European Journal of International Law, 2016, vol. 27, pp. 9-77 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  54. HOWSE, ROBERT; MAVROIDIS, PETROS C., Europe's Evolving Regulatory Strategy For GMOs – The Issue Of Consistency With WTO Law: Of Kine And Brine, Fordham Int'l L.J. 2000/24(2), pp. 317 – 370 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  55. MATSUSHITA, MITSUO; SCHOENBAUM, THOMAS J.; MAVROIDIS, PETROS C.; HAHN, MICHAEL, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy, 3rd edition, Oxford, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  56. MAVROIDIS, PETROS C., Regulatory Cooperation: Lessons from the WTO and the World Trade Regime, E15 Task Force on Regulatory Systems Coherence – Policy Options Paper. E15Initiative. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  57. PAYOSOVA, TETYANA; HUFBAUER, GARY CLYDE; SCHOTT, JEFFREY J., The Dispute Settlement Crisis in the World Trade Organization: Causes and Cures, PIIE Policy Brief 18-5, March 2018, available at: https://piie.com/system/files/documents/pb18-5.pdf (20/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  58. PRUSA, THOMAS; VERMULST, EDWIN, ‘United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China: Passing the Buck on Pass-Through’, World Trade Review, 2013, vol. 12, pp. 197–234 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  59. VAN DAMME, ISABELLE, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body, Oxford, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  60. VAN DEN BOSCHE, PETER; ZDOUC, WERNER, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization. Text, Cases and Materials, 4th edition, Cambridge, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  61. WILLIAM, DAVEY J., The Limits of Judicial Processes, in: Bethlehem, Daniel; Van Damme, Isabelle; McRae, Donald; Neufeld, Rodney, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, Oxford, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  62. YERXA, RUFUS; WILSON, BRUCE, Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement. The First Ten Years, Oxford, 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
  63. FITSCHEN, THOMAS, Inventing the Rule of Law for the United Nations, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law online, 2008, Vol. 12 (1), pp. 347-380 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-369
  64. LAUTENBACH, GERANNE, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-369
  65. MANUSAMA, KENNETH, The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality, Legal Aspects of International Organization, Vol. 47, Leiden, 2006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-369
  66. AHMETAJ, HYSNI, Legal Certainty and Legitimate Expectation in EU Law, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 2014, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 20-25 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  67. BARD, PETRA; CARRERA, SERGIO; GUILD, ELSPETH; KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, An EU mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, Brussels, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  68. BUNGENBERG, MARC, Vertrauensschutz, in: Heselhaus, F.S.M.; Nowak, Carsten (eds.), Handbuch der Europäischen Grundrechte, München, 2006, pp. 945 – 967 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  69. BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST, From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, Heidelberg, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  70. BUNGENBERG, MARC; TITI, CATHERINE, CETA Opinion – Setting Conditions for the Future of ISDS (05/06/2019), available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/ceta-opinion-setting-conditions-for-the-future-of-isds/ (05/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  71. CRABIT, EMMANUEL; BEL, NICOLLAS, The EU Rule of Law Framework, in: Schroeder, Werner (ed.), Strengthening the Rule of Law in Europe: From a Common Concept to Mechanisms of Implementation, Portland, Oregon, 2016, pp. 197 – 206 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  72. COUNCIL OF EUROPE, European Committee on Legal Co-operation (CDCJ), available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cdcj/activities/judicial-independence-impartiality/conference-sofia2016 (05/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  73. DEPARTMENT OF PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS, United Nations, The United Nations Rule of Law Indicators, Geneva, 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  74. ECHANDI, ROBERTO, ‘What Do Developing Countries Expect from the International Investment Regime?’ in: Alvarez, Jose E.; Sauvant, Karl P. (eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options, New York, 2011, pp. 3 – 21 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  75. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Investment, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/investment/ (09/04/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  76. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Rule of Law Framework, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/effective-justice/rule-law/rule-law-framework_en (04/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  77. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, The EU’s Rule of Law toolbox, Factsheet, April 2019, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rule_of_law_factsheet_1.pdf (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  78. GOLDSTON, VERONIKA SZENTE, Rule of law: EU 'mechanism' needs upgrade, available at: https://euobserver.com/opinion/123526 (04/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  79. GRIEBEL, JORN, Internationales Investitionsrecht, Munich, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  80. HAHN, MICHAEL, Art. 207 TFEU, para. 4 f., in: Callies, Chrisitian; Ruffert, Matthias (eds.), EUV/AEUV – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta. Kommentar 4th edition, Munich, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  81. HILLION, CRISTOPHE, Overseeing the rule of law in the European Union, European Policy Analysis, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 1-16 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  82. HOLTERHUS, TILL PATRICK, The Legal Dimensions of Rule of Law Promotion in EU Foreign Policy- EU Treaty Imperatives and Rule of Law Conditionality in the Foreign Trade and Development Nexus, in: Holterhus, Till Patrick, (ed.), The Law Behind Rule of Law Transfers,1st edition, Baden-Baden, 2019, pp. 73-111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  83. KARAGEORGOU, VASILIKI, Transparency principle as an evolving principle of EU law: Regulative contours and implications, available at: https://www.right2info.org/resources/publications/eu-karageorgou-vasiliki-transparency-principle-as-an-evolving-principle-of-eu-law/view (05/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  84. KAUFMANN-BÜHLER, WERNER, Art. 21 TEU, para. 6, in: Grabitz, Eberhard; Hilf, Meinhard; Nettesheim, Martin (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union: EUV/AEUV, 46th suppl. 2011 (‘Selbstbindung’) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  85. KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, Busting the myths nuclear: A commentary on Article 7 TEU, EUI Working Papers, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 1-13 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  86. KOCHENOV, DIMITRY; PECH, LAURENT, Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality, European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 512 – 540 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  87. KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, The EU Rule of Law: Cutting Paths Through Confusion, Erasmus Law Review, 2009, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 5 – 24 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  88. KRAJEWSKI, MARKUS, The Reform of the Common Commercial Policy, in: Biondi, Andrea; Eeckhout, Piet; Ripley, Stefanie (eds.), EU-Law After Lisbon, New York, 2012, pp. 292 – 311 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  89. LENAERTS, KOEN, The Kadi Saga and the Rule of Law within the EU, SMU Law Review, 2014, vol. 67, pp. 707 – 715 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  90. PECH, LAURENT, Rule of Law as a Guiding Principle of The European Union’s External Action, The Hague, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  91. PECH, LAURENT, The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union, New York, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  92. SATTOROVA, MAVLUDA, International Investment Treaties and the Promise of Good Governance: Norm and Institutional Design, Internalisation, and Domestic Rule-Making, ESIL Conference Paper Series, 2014, vol. 4, no. 11, 10th Anniversary Conference, Vienna, 4-6 September 2014, pp. 1-16 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  93. SAUTER, WOLF, Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act? Tilburg University, TILEC Discussion Paper, DP 2013-003, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  94. STREET, AMY, Judicial Review and the Rule of Law, London, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  95. SCHMIDT-AΒMANN, EBERHARD, Der Rechtstaat, in: Isensee, Josef; Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 541 – 612 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  96. TIMMERMANS, FRANS, Keynote speech at Conference on the Rule of Law, Tilburg University, 31 August 2015, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission /commissioners/2014-2019/timmermans/announcements/european-union-and-rule-law-keynote-speech-conference-rule-law-tilburg-university-31-august-2015_en (03/03/2017) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  97. VON DANWITZ, THOMAS, The Rule of Law in the Recent Jurisprudence of the ECJ, Fordham International Law Journal, 2014, vol. 37, issue 5, pp. 1312 – 1347 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  98. VEDDER, CHRISTOPH, Ziele der Gemeinsamen Handelspolitik und Ziele des auswärtigen Handelns, in: Herrmann, Cristoph/ Krenzler/ Horst G./ Streinz, Rudolf (eds.), Die Außenwirtschaftspolitik der Europäischen Union nach dem Verfassungsvertrag, Baden-Baden, 2006, pp. 43-62 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  99. VEDDER, CHRISTOPH, Linkage of the Common Commercial Policy to the General Objectives for the Union’s External Action, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Herrmann, Christoph (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Special Issue: Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 115-144 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
  100. ASH, ADRIAN, Why Europe IS Really Freaked Out Over A Greek Default, Forbes, 15/07/2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  101. AUGUSTIN, PATRICK, Credit Default Swaps: A Survey, Foundations and Trends in Finance, 2014, vol. 9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  102. BARTHOLOMEW, HELEN; DEVASABI, KRIS, Isda faces member backlash on margin lobbying, 25/05/2018, available at: http://www.risk.net/node/5636116 (22/03/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  103. BELL, RICK, Delaware LLC Privacy: What’s on Public Record?, available at: https://bit.ly/2UPzURI (21/03/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  104. BIGGINS, JOHN; SCOTT, COLIN, Private Governance, Public Implications and the Tightrope of Regulatory Reform: The ISDA Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees, Osgoode CLPE Research Paper, 2013, vol. 57 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  105. DAVIDOFF SOLOMON, STEVEN, A Fight Over Argentina’s Debt Produces No Winners, The New York Times, 21/12/2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  106. DURKEE, MELISSA J, Astroturf Activism, Stanford Law Review, 2017, vol. 69, pp. 201 – 268 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  107. ENGERT, ANDREAS, Private Normsetzungsmacht. Die Standardisierung von Regelungen im Markt als Form einer Fremdbestimmung, Rechtswissenschaft, 2014, vol. 3, pp. 301 – 340 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  108. ESPOSITO, CARLOS; LI, YUEFEN; BOHOSLAVSKY, JUAN PABLO, Sovereign Financing and International Law: The UNCTAD Principles on Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  109. FONTEVECCHIA, AUGUSTINO, Greece’s Inevitable Default Won’t Trigger CDS, So What’s The Point Of Protection?, Forbes, 22/07/2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  110. GELPERN ANNA, A Sensible Step to Mitigate Sovereign Bond Dysfunction, 29/08/2014, available at: https://bit.ly/2WME5ha (19/06/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  111. GELPERN, ANNA; GULATI, MITU, CDS Zombies, European Business Organization Law Review, 2012, vol. 13 pp. 347 – 390 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  112. GELPERN, ANNA; HALLER, BEN; SETSER, BRED, Count the Limbs: Designing Robust Aggregation Clauses in Sovereign Bonds, in: Guzman, Martin/Ocampo, José Antonio/Stiglitz, Joseph E (eds.), Too Little, Too Late: The Quest to Resolve Sovereign Debt Crises, New York Chichester, 2016, pp. 109 – 143 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  113. GOODMAN, LAWRENCE, Perils of Precedent: Threat of the Sovereign Bond Market, Emerging Markets Trade Association, New York, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  114. GRUSZCYŃSKI, LUKASZ; MENKES, MARCIN J, Hybrid Recognition of Monetary and Financial Sovereignty Or is it?, in: Czapliński, Władysław,/Kleczkowska, Agata (eds.), Unrecognized subjects in international law, Warsaw, 2019, pp. 371 – 391 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  115. HALE, THOMAS, When finance becomes a beneficiary of the green agenda, Financial Times, 05/01/2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  116. HAVEL, VACLAV, The Power of Powerless, 1978 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  117. HU, HENRY TC, Misunderstood Derivatives: The Causes of Informational Failure and the Promise of Regulatory Incrementalism, The Yale Law Journal 1993, vol. 102(6), pp. 1457 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  118. HU, HENRY TC, Reform the credit default swap market to rein in abuses, Financial Times, 24/02/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  119. INDAP, SUJEET; SMITH ROBERT, Contentious legal ruling puts Windstream at risk of bankruptcy, Financial Times, 17/02/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  120. JEWETT, MARK; PEIHANI, MAZIAR, How Ontario Could Leave the World in Sovereign Debt Restructuring, Policy Brief 108, Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  121. JUDGE, KATHRYN, Intermediary Influence, The University of Chicago Law Review 2015, vol. 82, pp. 573 – 642 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  122. KIBBE, RICHARD; GRADY, JENNIFER; LEE, RICHARD J, Sovereign CDS: lessons from the Greek debt crisis, Lexology, available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e9c8eae6-b2ad-4fe7-9a9f-9f299cd2607f (10/03/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  123. LESSIG, LAWRENCE, Republic, lost: how money corrupts Congress – and a plan to stop it, New York, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  124. LIENAU, ODETTE, Rethinking Sovereign Debt. Politics, Reputation and Legitimacy in Modern Finance, Cambridge, London, 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  125. MAKOFF, GREGORY; KAHN, ROBERT, Sovereign Bond Contract Reform. Implementing the New ICMA Pari Passu and Collective Action Clauses, CIGI Papers, 2015, vol. 56 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  126. MCCORMICK, LIZ; GREIFELD, KATHERINE, Hidden Bond Market Dangers Expose Traders to $2 Trillion Wipeout, Bloomberg Business Week, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  127. MENKES, MARCIN J, Reforma systemów nadzoru finansowego UE I USA ze szczególnym uwzglednieniem kryzysu z lat 2007-2008, International Journal of Management and Economics, 2013, vol. 37, pp. 130-151 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  128. MENKES, MARCIN J, “Dobrzy, zli i brzydcy”. Prawne kontrowersje wokól restrukturyzacji argentynskich obligacji’, Przeglad Prawa Handlowego, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 31-37 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  129. MENKES, MARCIN J, Rule of Law in International Monetary and Financial Law: New(ish) Solution and Old Mistakes, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  130. NORTH, DOUGLASS C; THOMAS, ROBERT PAUL, The Rise of the Western Wolrd: A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press, 1973 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  131. PARK, STEVENS, Investors as Regulators: Green Bonds and the Governance Challenges of the Sustainable Finance Revolution, Stanford Journal of International Law, 2018, vol. 54, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3142887 (23/03/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  132. PARTNOY FRANK, ISDA, NASD, CFMA and SDNY: The Four Horsemen of Derivatives Regulations?, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, 2002, vol. 39, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=293085 (23/03/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  133. PEACOCK, NICHOLAS, Derivatives Disputes: ISDA revises Arbitration Guide, expanding the model arbitration clauses, 19/12/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2HFAYVc (23/03/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  134. PORZECANSKI, ARTURO C, Buenos Aires to Athens: The Road to Perdition, Washington, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  135. RENNISON, JOE, “Manufactured” credit default calles off after legal challenge, Financial Times, 30/05/2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  136. RENNISON, JOE; INDAP SUJEET, Wall Street tries to clean up $8tn market for credit derivatives, Financial Times, 14/03/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  137. RILES, ANNELISE, The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge and the Legitimacy of the State, The American Journal of Comparative Law 2008, vol. 56(3), pp. 605 – 630 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  138. ROSE, PAUL, Certifying the “Climate” in climate bonds, Capital Market Law Journal, 2019, vol. 14, pp. 59 – 77 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  139. SCHUPPERT, GUNNAR FOLKE, From Plurality of Normative Orders to Plurality of Norm Producers, The World of Rules, 2017, pp. 137 – 194 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  140. SLAUGHTER, ANNE-MARIE, A New World Order, Princeton University Press, 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  141. SMITH, ROBERT, Isda’s whack-a-mole fixes for credit default swaps merit scrutiny, Financial Times, 08/03/2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  142. SNYDER, TIMOTHY, The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America, Vintage Digital, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  143. SOBEL, MARK, Strengthening collective action clauses: catalysing change – the back story, Capital Markets Law Journal, 2016, vol. 11, pp. 3- 11 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  144. STIGLITZ, JOSEPH E; GUZMAN, MARTIN, A Step Forward for Sovereign Debt, 09/11/2015, available at: https://bit.ly/2GYPcOn (30/04/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  145. STIGLITZ, JOSEPH E; GUZMAN, MARTIN, A Rule of Law for Sovereign Debt, Project Syndicate, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  146. STOLPER, ANTONIA E; DOUGHERTY, SEAN, Collective action clauses: how the Argentina litigation changes the sovereign debt markets, Capital Markets Law Journal, 2017, 12, pp. 239 – 252 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  147. SZTOMPKA, PIOTR, Zaufanie. Fundament spo leczenstwa, Znak, 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  148. VERDIER, PIERRE-HUGUES, Credit Derivatives and the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Process, Harvard Law School, 2004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  149. WAIBEL, MICHAEL, Sovereign defaults international courts and tribunals│ Public international law, Cambridge University Press, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  150. WAIBEL, MICHAEL, Steering sovereign debt restructurings through the CDS quicksand, Journal of Banking Regulation, 2014, vol. 15, pp. 14 – 40 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  151. WEIDEMAIER, MARK C; SCOTT, ROBERT E; GULATI, G MITU, Origin Myths, Contracts and the Hunt for Pari Passu, UNC Legal Studies Research Paper 1633439, 2011, available at: https://bit.ly/2IRbxRg (19/03/2019). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  152. WIELSCH, DAN, Global Law’s Toolbox: Private Regulation by Standards, The American Journal of Comparative Law 60, pp. 1075 – 1104 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
  153. ASBRAND, DOMINIK; NEHRING-KÖPPL, JAN, Die Neuregelung der Kontrolle von Unternehmenstransaktionen – Beitrag zur Reform der sektorübergreifenden Investitionskontrolle gem. §§ 55-59 AWV, Zeitschrift für Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht IWRZ, 2018, S. 63 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  154. BAYER, WALTER; OHLER, CHRISTOPH, Staatsfonds ante portas, Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung, 2008, S. 12 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  155. BECKER, FLORIAN; SACHS, BÄRBEL, Die Investitionsprüfung nach Änderung der AWV – offene Fragen aus Perspektive der Transaktionspraxis, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 1336 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  156. BERG, CAI; SIMON, BJÖRN, Auswirkungen der Änderungen des Außenwirtschaftsgesetzes auf die M&A-Vertragspraxis, M&A Review 2009, S. 159 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  157. BICKENBACH, FRANK; LIU, WAN-HSIN, Chinese Direct Investment in Europe – Challenges for EU FDI Policy, CESifo Forum 4/2018, S. 15-22 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  158. BOEWE, MARIUS; JOHNEN, CHRISTIAN, Die Änderung der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung und deren Relevanz für Unternehmenskäufe, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 1095 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  159. BRAUNECK, JENS, Ausländische Direktinvestitionen nur mit Einverständnis der EU-Kommission?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, S. 188 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  160. BUNDESVERBAND DER DEUTSCHEN INDUSTRIE E.V. (BDI) (Hrsg.), Mehr Schutz vor ausländischen Investoren? – Wirtschaftliche und EU-rechtliche Aspekte der geplanten Beschränkung ausländischer Beteiligungen an deutschen Unternehmen, Berlin, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  161. CALLIESS, CHRISTIAN; RUFFERT, MATTHIAS (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  162. CENTRUM FÜR EUROPÄISCHE POLITIK (cep), Proposal COM(2017) 487 of 13 September 2017 for a Regulation establishing a framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union, cepPolicyBrief No. 2017-32 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  163. CLOSTERMEYER, MAXIMILIAN, Staatliche Übernahmeabwehr und die Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit zu Drittstaaten, Baden-Baden, 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  164. DAMMANN DE CHAPTO, JANA K.; BRÜGEMANN, NIKLAS, Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Investitionskontrollrecht – Der „Fall Leifeld“ und die öffentliche Sicherheit, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht, 2018, S. 412 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  165. DE KOK, JOCHEM, Towards a European Framework for Foreign Investment Reviews, European Law Review, 2019, S. 24 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  166. DIRNHAUSEN, FLORIAN; ECKSTEIN, HANS-MARTIN (Hrsg.), Beck’sches Handbuch der AG, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  167. DOLZER, RUDOLF; SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH, Principles of International Investment Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford, 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  168. EDITORIAL COMMENTS, Playing by the rules – Free and fair trade, CMLRev. 2018, Vol. 55, S. 373 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  169. EHLERS, DIRK (Hrsg.), Europäische Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten, 4. Auflage, Berlin u.a., 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  170. GERMELMANN, CLAAS FRIEDRICH, Konkurrenz von Grundfreiheiten und Missbrauch von Gemeinschaftsrecht – Zum Verhältnis von Kapitalverkehrs- und Niederlassungsfreiheit in der neueren Rechtsprechung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2008, S. 596 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  171. GRABITZ, EBERHARD; HILF, MEINHARD; NETTESHEIM, MARTIN (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, 65. EL, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  172. GRIEBEL, JÖRN, Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht, München, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  173. GÜNTHER, VALENTIN, Der Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission für eine Verordnung zur Schaffung eines Rahmens für die Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen in der Europäischen Union – Investitionskontrolle in der Union vor dem Hintergrund kompetenzrechtlicher Fragen, Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, Heft 157 (08-2018), Halle (Saale) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  174. HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Die Zukunft der mitgliedstaatlichen Investitionspolitik nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2010, S. 207 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  175. HINDELANG, STEFFEN; HAGEMEYER, TEOMAN M., Enemy at the Gates? Die aktuellen Änderungen der Investitionsprüfvorschriften in der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung im Lichte des Unionsrechts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 882 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  176. HINDELANG, STEFFEN, Gestufte Freiheitsverbürgung? Art. 63 Abs. 1 AEUV (Ex-Art. 56 Abs. 1 EG) im Drittstaatenkontext, Internationales Steuerrecht, 2010, S. 443 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  177. HINDELANG, STEFFEN, The Free Movement of Capital and Foreign Direct Investment: The Scope of Protection in EU Law, Oxford, 2009 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  178. HOOK, CHRISTOPHER, Was lange währt wird endlich gut? Die neuen Änderungsverordnungen im Bereich der handelspolitischen Schutzinstrumente, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 188 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  179. JOHANNSEN, SVEN LEIF ERIK, Der Investitionsbegriff nach Art. 25 Abs. 1 der ICSID-Konvention, Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, 2009, Heft 87 (04-2009), Halle (Saale) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  180. JOHANNSEN, SVEN LEIF ERIK, Die europarechtliche Bewertung der beabsichtigen erneuten Reform des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur Kontrolle ausländischer Beteiligungen an Betreibern kritischer Infrastrukturen (Teil 1), Infrastrukturrecht, 2018, S. 225 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  181. JOHANNSEN, SVEN LEIF ERIK, Die europarechtliche Bewertung der beabsichtigten erneuten Reform des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur Kontrolle ausländischer Beteiligungen an Betreibern kritischer Infrastrukturen (Teil 2), Infrastrukturrecht, 2018, S. 247 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  182. KAHL, WOLFGANG; SCHWIND, MANUEL, Europäische Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten – Grundbausteine einer Interaktionslehre, EuropaRecht, 2014, S. 170 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  183. KEMMERER, MARTIN, Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit und Drittstaaten, Baden-Baden, 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  184. KIRSCHNER, JULIA, Grundfreiheiten und nationale Gestaltungsspielräume – Eine Analyse der Rechtsprechung des EuGH, München, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  185. KRENZLER, HORST GÜNTHER; HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH; NIESTEDT, MARIAN (Hrsg.), EU-Außenwirtschafts und Zollrecht, 12. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  186. KROLOP, KASPAR, Schutz vor Staatsfonds und anderen ausländischen Kapitalmarktakteuren unter Ausblendung des Kapitalmarktrechts?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 2008, S. 40 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  187. LECHELER, HELMUT; GERMELMANN, CLAAS FRIEDRICH, Zugangsbeschränkungen für Investitionen aus Drittstaaten im deutschen und europäischen Energierecht, Tübingen, 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  188. MARTINI, MARIO, Zu Gast bei Freunden?: Staatsfonds als Herausforderung an das europäische und internationale Recht, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 2008, S. 314 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  189. MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL; HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Die Entwicklung des europäischen Außenwirtschaftsrechts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, S. 749 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  190. MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL, Foreign Investment in Germany: Restrictions Based on Public Security Concerns and Their Compatibility with EU Law, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 2010, S. 103 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  191. NETTESHEIM, MARTIN, Unternehmensübernahmen durch Staatsfonds: Europarechtliche Vorgaben und Schranken, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2008, S. 729 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  192. PANDEY, GIANI; ROVETTA, DAVIDE; SMIATACZ, AGNIESZKA, How Many Barriers Should a Steeple Chase Have? Will the EU’s Proposed Regulation on Screening of Foreign Direct Investments Add yet More Delaying Barriers When Getting a Merger Deal through the Clearance Gate, and Other Considerations, Global Trade and Customs Journal 2019, Vol. 14, S. 56 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  193. PECHSTEIN, MATTHIAS; NOWAK, CARSTEN; HÄDE, ULRICH (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Tübingen, 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  194. ROSENFELDT, HERBERT; WÜRDEMANN, AIKE, Schöpfer des Binnenmarktes im Käfig der Verträge – Die grundfreiheitliche Bindung des EU-Gesetzgebers, EuropaRecht, 2016, S. 453 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  195. ROTH, WULF-HENNING, Investitionsbeschränkungen im deutschen Außenwirtschaftsrecht, Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft, 2009, S. 257 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  196. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., The European Union’s Foreign Direct Investment Screening Paradox: Tightening Inward Investment Control to Further External Investment Liberalization, Legal Issues of Economic Intergration 2019, Vol. 46, S. 105 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  197. SCHLADEBACH, MARCUS; BECKER, FREDERIKE, Die Verschärfung der Investitionskontrolle im deutschen und europäischen Außenwirtschaftsrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 1076 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  198. SCHÖNFELD, JENS, Besteuerung von Dividenden, die von einer in einem Drittstaat ansässigen Gesellschaft gezahlt werden, Internationales Steuerrecht, 2007, S. 441 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  199. SCHROEDER, WERNER (Hrsg.), Europarecht als Mehrebenensystem – Beiträge zum 7. Österreichischen Europarechtstag 2007, Baden-Baden, 2008 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  200. SCHUELKEN, TOBIAS, Der Schutz kritischer Infrastrukturen vor ausländischen Direktinvestitionen in der Europäischen Union. Zum Vorschlag der EU-Kommission für eine Verordnung zur Schaffung eines Rahmens für die Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen – KOM(2017) 487 endg., EuropaRecht, 2018, S. 577 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  201. SLOBODENJUK, DIMITRI, Weitere Verschärfung der Investitionskontrolle in Deutschland – ein praxisrelevanter Überblick, Betriebs-Berater, 2019, S. 202 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  202. STREINZ, RUDOLF (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV – Vertrag über die Europäische Union, Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  203. SUMMERSBERGER, WALTER; MERZ, MATTHIAS; JATZKE, HARALD; ACHATZ, MARKUS (Hrsg.), Außenwirtschaft, Verbrauchersteuern und Zoll im 21. Jahrhundert – Festschrift für Hans-Michael Wolffgang zum 65. Geburtstag, Köln, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  204. THOMAS, STEFAN, Die Relevanzregel in der europäischen Grundfreiheitendogmatik – Zur Frage eines Spürbarkeitserfordernisses bei der Beeinträchtigung von Grundfreiheiten, Neue Verwaltungszeitschrift, 2009, S. 1202 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  205. VOLAND, THOMAS, Freitag, der Dreizehnte – Die Neuregelungen des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur verschärften Kontrolle ausländischer Investitionen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2009, S. 519 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  206. VOLAND, THOMAS, Rechtsschutz gegen Maßnahmen der Investitionskontrolle im Außenwirtschaftsrecht – Fiat iustitia?!, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2010, S. 132 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  207. VON ARNAULD, ANDREAS (Hrsg.), Europäische Außenbeziehungen, in: Hatje, Armin; Müller-Graff, Peter-Christian (Gesamt-Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie Europarecht, 2014, Band 10 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  208. VON DER GROEBEN, HANS; SCHWARZE, JÜRGEN; HATJE, ARMIN (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht – Vertrag über die Europäische Union, Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  209. VRANES, ERICH, State Measures Protecting Against „Undesirable“ Foreign Investment. Issues in EU and International Law, Zeitschrift für Öffetnliches Recht, 2012, S. 639 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  210. WATRIN, CHRISTOPH; EBERHARDT, DAVID, Anwendung der Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit im Bereich der internationalen Dividendenbesteuerung, Betriebs-Berater, 2014, S. 2967 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  211. WATRIN, EBERHARDT, Anwendung der Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit im Bereich der internationalen Dividendenbesteuerung, Betriebs-Berater, 2014, S. 2967 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  212. WEITNAUER, MANUEL, Die AWV-Investitionsprüfung bei M&A-Transaktionen, Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 81 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  213. WELLER, MARC-PHILIPPE, Ausländische Staatsfonds zwischen Fusionskontrolle, Außenwirtschaft und Grundfreiheiten, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht ZIP, 2008, S. 857 ff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  214. WISSENSCHAFTLICHE DIENSTE DES DEUTSCHEN BUNDESTAGES, Schutz vor ausländischen Staatsfonds, WD 7 – 178/07, 2007 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  215. WOLFFGANG, HANS-MICHAEL; SIMONSEN, OLAF; ROGMANN, ACHIM (Hrsg.), AWR-Kommentar – Kommentar für das gesamte Außenwirtschaftsrecht, 59. EL, Köln, 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
  216. ALVAREZ, JOSÉ E., The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment, Hague Academy of International Law 2011 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  217. ALVAREZ-JIMENEZ, ALBERTO, The WTO Appellate Body’s Decision-Making Process: A Perfect Model for International Adjudication?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2009, Vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 289-331 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  218. ALVAREZ ZÁRATE, JOSÉ MANUEL, Legitimacy Concerns of the Proposed Multilateral Investment Court: is Democracy Possible?, Boston College Law Review, 2018, Vol. 59, pp. 2765-2790 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  219. BAETENS, FREYA, The European Union’s Proposed Investment Court System: Addressing Criticisms of Investor-State Arbitration While Raising New Challenges, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2016, Vol. 43, issue 4, pp. 367-384 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  220. BEDOYA, FERNANDO/RAMÍREZ, JOSÉ LUIS, Un Sistema de Corte Permanente Como Alternativa al Arbitraje de Inversiones Ventajas y Desventajas, Revista del Club Español del Arbitraje, 2016, issue 26, pp. 39-56 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  221. BEHN, DANIEL, Legitimacy, Evolution and Growth in Investment Arbitration: Empirically Evaluating the State-of-the-Art, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 2015, Vol. 46, pp. 363-416 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  222. BERNARDINI, PIERO, Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The Need to Balance Both Parties’ Interests, ICSID Review 2017, Vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 38-57 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  223. BOTTINI, GABRIEL, Reform of the Investor-State Arbitration Regime, in: Kalicki, Jean E./Joubin-Bret, Anna (eds.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System, Brill Nijhoff 2015, pp. 455-473 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  224. BROWER, CHARLES N./AHMAD, JAWAD, From the Two-Headed Nightingale to the Fifteen-Headed Hydra: The Many Follies of the Proposed International Investment Court, Fordham International Law Journal, 2018, Vol. 41, issue 4, pp. 791-820 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  225. BUNGENBERG, MARC/REINISCH, AUGUST, From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court: Options Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  226. BUTLER, NICOLETTE/SUBEDI, SURYA, The Future of International Investment Regulation: Towards a World Investment Organisation?, Netherlands International Law Review, 2017, Vol. 64, issue 1, pp. 43-72 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  227. CALAMITA, JANSEN, The (In)Compatibility of Appellate Mechanisms with Existing Instruments of the Investment Treaty Regime, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2017, Vol. 18, pp. 585-627 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  228. CHUNG, OLIVIA, The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and its Effect on the Future of Investor-State Arbitration, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2007, Vol. 47, issue 4, pp. 953-976 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  229. DOLZER, RUDOLF/SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH, Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  230. EHLERMANN, CLAUS-DIETER, Experiences from the WTO Appellate Body, Texas International Law Journal, 2003, Vol. 38, pp. 469-488 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  231. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Concept Paper: Investment in TTIP and beyond—the path for reform (5 May 2015), available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/may/tradoc_153408.PDF (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  232. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Multilateral Reform of Investment Dispute Resolution accompanying the document Recommendation for a Council Decision Authorising the Opening of Negotiations for a Convention Establishing a Multilateral Court for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, (Impact Assessment) SWD (2017) 302 final Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  233. EUROPEAN UNION, Submission of the European Union and its Member States to UNCITRAL Working Group III: Establishing a standing Mechanism for the Settlement of International Investment Disputes, 18 January 2019 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  234. FACH GÓMEZ, KATIA, Unión Europea e Inversiones Internacionales: El futuro de los Mecanismos de Resolución de Controversias Inversor-Estado, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 2017, Vol. 69, issue 1, pp. 295-302 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  235. FITZMAURICE, MALGOSIA, The Practical Working of the Law of Treaties, in: Evans, Malcom D (ed.), International Law, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press 2010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  236. FRANCK, SUSAN D., The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions, Fordham Law Review, 2004, Vol. 73, pp. 1521-1625 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  237. FRANCK, SUSAN D., The Nature and Enforcement of Investor Rights Under Investment Treaties: Do Investment Treaties Have a Bright Future, University of California Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 2005, Vol. 12, pp. 47-99 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  238. FRANCK, SUSAN D./WYLIE, LINDSEY E., Predicting Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Duke Law Journal, 2015, Vol. 65, pp. 459-526 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  239. FRY, JAMES D./REPOUSIS, ODYSSEAS G., Towards a New World for Investor-State Arbitration through Transparency, NYUJ International Law and Politics, 2016, Vol. 48/3, pp. 795-866 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  240. GARCÍA-BOLIVAR, OMAR E., Permanent Investment Tribunals: The Momentum is Building up, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2064 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  241. GOLDHABER, MICHAEL D., Wanted: A World Investment Court, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=197 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  242. GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA, LUIS, Making Impossible Investor-State Reform Possible, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2029 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  243. HAPP, RICHARD/WUSCHKA, SEBASTIAN, From the Jay Treaty Commissions towards a Multilateral Investment Court: Addressing the Enforcement Dilemma, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 2017, Vol. VI/1, pp. 113-132 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  244. HOWARD, DAVID M., Creating Consistency through a World Investment Court, Fordham International Law Journal, 2017, Vol. 41, pp. 1-52 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  245. HOWSE, ROBERT, Designing an International Investment Court: Issues and Options, Yearbook of European Law, 2017, Vol. 36, pp. 209-236 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  246. HSU, LOCKNIE, Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform – Examining the Formative Aspect of Investment Treaty Commitments: Lessons from Commercial Law and Trade Law, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2035 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  247. KARTON, JOSHUA, Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from International Uniform Law, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014/1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2046 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  248. KATZ, REBECCA LEE, Modeling an International Investment Court after the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 2016, Vol. 22, pp. 163-188 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  249. KAUFMANN-KOHLER, GABRIELLE/POTESTA, MICHELE, Can the Mauritius Convention serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism?, 3 June 2016, available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/CIDS_Research_Paper_Mauritius.pdf (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  250. KAUFMANN-KOHLER, GABRIELLE/POTESTÁ, MICHELE, The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards: CIDS Supplement Report, 15 November 2017, available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/workinggroups/wg_3/CIDS_Supplemental_Report.pdf (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  251. KAUSHAL, ASHA, Revisiting History: How the Past matters for the Present Backlash against Foreign Investment Regime, Harvard International Law Journal, 2009, Vol. 50, issue 2, pp. 491-534 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  252. KHO, STEPHEN S./YANOVICH, ALAN/CASEY, BRENDAN R./STRAUSS, JOHANN, The EU TTIP Investment Court Proposal and the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Comparing Apples and Oranges?, ICSID Review, 2017, Vol. 32, issue 2, pp. 326-345 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  253. KOLB, ROBERT, The Law of the Treaties: An Introduction, 2016 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  254. LANGFORD, MALCOM/BEHN, DANIEL/LIE, RUNAR HILLEREN, The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration, Journal of International Economic Law, 2017, Vol. 20, issue 2, pp. 301-331 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  255. LEADER, SHELDON, Human Rights, Risks, and New Strategies for Global Investment, Journal of International Economic Law, 2006, Vol. 9, issue 3, pp. 657-705 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  256. LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 2009, Vol. XXXV/1, pp. 33-136 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  257. LEE, JASMIN, Mending the Wound or Pulling it Apart? New Proposals for International Investment Courts and Fragmentation of International Investment Law, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2018, Vol. 39, issue 1, pp. 1-35 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  258. LOIBL, GERHARD, International Economic Law, in: Evans, Malcom D. (ed.), International Law, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press 2010, pp. 722-751 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  259. LÓPEZ MARTÍN, ANA GEMMA, Aplicación de tratados sucesivos concernientes a la misma materia. Análisis del artículo 30 de la Convención de Viena sobre Derecho de los Tratados, Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, 2017, Vol. 10, pp. 51-84 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  260. MAVRODIS, PETROS C./WU, MARK, The Law of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Documents, Cases & Analysis, 2nd ed. American Casebook Series 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  261. MCRAE, DONALD, The WTO Appellate Body: A Model for an ICSID Appeals Facility?, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2010, Vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 371-387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  262. MERRILLS, J. G., International Dispute Settlement, 4th ed., 2005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  263. MILES, KATE, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital, 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  264. PAUWELYN, JOOST, At the Edge of Chaos? Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed, ICSID Review, 2014, Vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 372-418 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  265. PAUWELYN, JOOST, The Rule of Law without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus, The American Journal of International Law, 2015, Vol. 109, issue 4, pp. 761-805 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  266. PLATT, ROWAN, The Appeal of Appeal Mechanisms in International Arbitration: Fairness over Finality?, Journal of International Arbitration, 2013, Vol. 30, pp. 531-560 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  267. POTESTÀ, MICHELE, Investment Arbitration, Challenges and Prospects for the Establishment of a Multilateral Investment Court: Quo Vadis Enforcement?, in: Klausegger, Christian et. al. (eds.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, pp. 157-178 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  268. PUIG, SERGIO/SHAFFER, GREGORY, Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law, American Journal of International Law, 2018, Vol. 112, issue 3, pp. 361-409 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  269. PUIG, SERGIO/STREZHNEV, ANTON, Affiliation Bias in Arbitration: An Experimental Approach, Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, Vol. 46, pp. 371-398 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  270. RAJPUT, ANIRUDDHA, The Myth of a Multilateral Framework in International Investment Law, Indian Journal of International Law, 2017, Vol. 56, issues 3-4, pp. 427-461 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  271. REINISCH, AUGUST, Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards? – The limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19, issue 4, pp. 761-786 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  272. ROBERTS, ANTHEA, Incremental, Systematic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor-State Arbitration, The American Journal of International Law, 2018, Vol. 112, issue 3, pp. 410-432 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  273. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law: Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds, Trade Law and Development, 2010, Vol. 2/1, pp. 59-86 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  274. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Conceptual Framework and Options for the Way Forward, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, 2015, available at: http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/E15-Investment-Schill-FINAL.pdf (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  275. SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Das TTIP-Gericht: Keimzelle oder Stolperstein für echte Multilateralisierung des internationalen Investitionsrechts?, Verfassungsblog, 25 November 2015, available at: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2676024/168554_495440.pdf (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  276. SCHWIEDER, ROBERT W., TTIP and the Investment Court System: A new (and improved) Paradigm for Investor-State Adjudication, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2016, Vol. 55, pp. 178-227 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  277. SHAW, MALCOM N., International Law, 8th ed. Cambridge University Press 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  278. SHIN, HI-TAEK, Annulment, in: Kinnear, Meg et. al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law – The first 50 Years of ICSID, Kluwer Law International 2016, pp. 699-714 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  279. STEIN, TORSTEN/VON BUTTLAR, CHRISTIAN, Völkerrecht, 13th ed., 2012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  280. TITI, AIKATERINI (CATHARINE), The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law, 2014 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  281. TITI, CATHARINE, The European Union’s Proposal for an International Investment Court: Significance, Innovations and Challenges ahead, Transnational Dispute Management, 2017/1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2427 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  282. TITI, CATHARINE, Procedural Multilateralism and Multilateral Investment Court: Discussion in Light of Increased Institutionalism in Transatlantic Relations, in: Fahey, Elaine (ed.), Institutionalisation Beyond the Nation State – Transatlantic Relations: Data, Privacy and Trade Law, 2018, pp. 149-164 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  283. TITI, CATHERINE, Who’s afraid of Reform? Beware the Risk of Fragmentation, American Journal of International Law Unbound, 2018, Vol. 112, pp. 232-236 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  284. UNCITRAL, Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Settlement Reform) on the Work of its Thirty-Fourth Session (Vienna, 27 November-1 December 2017), A/CN.9/930/Rev.1, 20 April 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  285. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.142, 18 September 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  286. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Submissions from International Intergovernmental Organizations, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.143, 13 October 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  287. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Submission from the European Union, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.145, 12 December 2017 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  288. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Submissions from International Intergovernmental Organizations and additional Information: Appointment of Arbitrators, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.146, 19 February 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  289. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Consistency and Related Matters, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.150, 28 August 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  290. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) – Arbitrators and decision-makers: Appointment mechanisms and related issues, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.152, 30 August 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  291. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Cost and Duration, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.153, 31 August 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  292. UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.149, 5 September 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  293. VAN DEN BOSSCHE, PETER/ZDOUC, WERNER, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 3rd ed., 2013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  294. VAN HARTEN, GUS, Perceived Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Waibel, Michael et. al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2010, pp. 433-453 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  295. VAN HARTEN, GUS, Key flaws in the European Commission’s proposals for foreign investor protection in TTIP, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16, 2016, Vol. 12, issue 4, available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1139&context=olsrps (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  296. VON DER DECKEN, KERSTIN, Art. 39 VCLT, in: Dörr, Oliver/Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, 2018 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  297. VOON, TANIA, Consolidating International Investment Law: The Mega-Regionals as a Pathway Towards Multilateral Rules, World Trade Review, 2017, Vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 33-63 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  298. WAIBEL, MICHAEL et. al., The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, in: Waibel, Michael et. al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2010, pp. xxxvi-li Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  299. WUSCHKA, SEBASTIAN, Ein Investitionsgerichtshof: Der groβe Wurf der EU-Kommission?, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 2016/2, pp. 153-176 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
  300. ZULETA, EDUARDO, The Challenges of Creating a Standing International Investment Court, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014/1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2065 (16/05/2019) Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477

Latest issues

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
See all issues
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 4
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 4
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 3
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 3
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 2
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 2
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 1
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 1
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 27 (2024), Heft 4
Ausgabe Full access
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 27 (2024), Heft 4

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS

Send suggestion