ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien

doi:10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3

Über die Zeitschrift

ZEuS verfolgt ein breit angelegtes Konzept: Die Beiträge widmen sich aktuellen und grundsätzlichen Problemen der Europäischen Integration, des Europarechts und des Internationalen Rechts. Mit der Möglichkeit in deutscher, englischer, französischer und spanischer Sprache zu veröffentlichen, bietet ZEuS ein ideales internationales Forum für Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis. ZEuS ist es ein besonderes Anliegen, neben renommierten Wissenschaftlern auch dem wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs ein Forum für Veröffentlichungen zu geben. Daher wird die Einreichung von Beiträgen von Nachwuchswissenschaftlern, aber auch von ausgezeichneten Ergebnissen studentischer Magister- und Seminararbeiten unterstützt. Darüber hinaus werden die am Europa-Institut gehaltenen Vorträge grundsätzlich in ZEuS veröffentlicht. Es werden Beiträge in englischer, französischer und deutscher Sprache publiziert. Homepage: www.zeus.nomos.de

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

ISSN-Print: 1435-439X
ISSN-Online: 2942-3589
Verlag: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache: Deutsch
Produkttyp: Ausgabe

Artikel

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 22 (2019), Heft 3

Artikel

Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 429 - 476

Nicht zuletzt vor dem Hintergrund der chinesischen Industriepolitik nimmt die Sorge vor einem Ausverkauf von Hochtechnologie durch staatlich gelenkte und subventionierte chinesische Investoren in der Europäischen Union allgemein zu. Der deutsche...

Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019

Autor:innen:

Download Artikel (PDF)

Literaturverzeichnis (300 Einträge)

ALLAN, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law, Oxford, 2001 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
ALLOTT, PHILIP, Towards the International Rule of Law: Essays in Integrated Constitutional Theory, London, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
ALVAREZ, JOSÉ E., International Organizations and the Rule of Law, Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper, 2016, vol. 4 (Global Administrative Law Series Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
BEAULAC, STÉPHANE, The Rule of Law in International Law Today, in: Palombella, Gianluigi; Walker, Neil (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law, Oxford/Portland, 2009, pp. 197-204 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
BERMAN, HAROLD, Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition, Vol. I., Cambridge, MA/London, 1983 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
BINGHAM, TOM, The Rule of Law, London, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
BROWNLIE, IAN, The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations, The Hague/London/Boston, 1998 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
CAMERON, LINDESY; EVERLY, REBECCA, Conceptualizing the Administration of Territory by International Actors, European Journal of International Law, 2010, vol. 21(1), pp. 221-244 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
CHESTERMAN, SIMON, An International Rule of Law, American Journal of Comparative Law, 2008, vol. 56(2), pp. 331-361 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
CRAIG, PAUL, Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework, in: Bellamy, Richard (ed.), The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers, Farnham, 2005, pp. 467-487 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
DICEY, ALBERT VENN, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Pt II, London, 1885 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
DYZENHAUS, DAVID, Recrafting the Rule of Law: The Limits of Legal Order, Portland, 1999 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
ECHANDI, ROBERTO, What Do Developing Countries Expect from the International Investment Regime?, in: Alvarez, José E.; Sauvant, Karl P.; Ahmed, Kamil Gérard; Vizcamno, Gabriela P. (eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options, Oxford, 2011, pp. 3-21 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION), Report on the Rule of Law, adopted at its 86th plenary session, Study No. 512 / 2009, CDL-AD(2011)003rev, Strasbourg, 4 April 2011, available at: www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e (30/04/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
FARRAL, JEREMY MATAM, United Nations Sanctions and the Rule of Law, Cambridge, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
FLORES, IMER B.; HIMMA, KENNETH (eds.), Law, Liberty and the Rule of Law, Dordrecht, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
GROTE, RAINER, Rule of Law, Rechtsstaat and “Etat de droit”, in: Starck, Christian (ed.), Constitutionalism, Universalism and Democracy – a comparative analysis, Baden-Baden, 1999, pp. 269–306 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
HIGGINS, ROSALYN, The Rule of Law: Some Sceptical Thoughts, in: Higgins, Rosalyn (ed.), Themes and Theories: Selected Essays, Speeches, and Writings in International Law, Vol. 1, Oxford, 2009, pp. 1330 – 1340 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
ILA COMMITTEE on ‘Rule of Law and International Investment Law’ mandate in its committee description available at: www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/1056 (30/04/2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
KEITH, KENNETH J., The International Rule of Law, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2015, vol. 28(3), pp. 403-417 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
KELSEN, HANS, Pure Theory of Law, Clark, New Jersey, 1970 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
KINGSBURY, BENEDICT, International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order, in: Crawford, James; Koskenniemi, Martti (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 203-227 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
KOSKENNIEMI, MARTTI, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960, Cambridge, 2001 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
MCCORQUODALE, ROBERT, Defining the International Rule of Law: Defying Gravity?, International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2016, vol. 65(2), pp. 277-304 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
PALOMBELLA, GIANLUIGI, The Rule of Law and its Core, in: Palombella, Gianluigi; Walker, Neil (eds.), Relocating the Rule of Law, Oxford/Portland, 2009, 17-42 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
PAULSSON, JAN, Denial of Justice in International Law, Cambridge, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
RAZ, JOSEPH, The Authority of Law, Oxford, 1979 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
SATTOROVA, MALVUDA, International Investment Treaties and the Promise of Good Governance: Norm and Institutional Design, Internalisation, and Domestic Rule-Making, in: Reinisch, August; Footer, Mary E.; Binder, Christina (eds.), International Law and… Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law, Oxford, 2016, pp. 131-148 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law, Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper 2006, vol. 6 (Global Administrative Law Series) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law, in: Stephan W. Schill (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public, Oxford, 2010, pp. 151-183 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
SCHNEIDERMAN, DAVID, Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise, Cambridge, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
TAMANAHA, BRIAN Z., On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge, 2004 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Rule of Law at the National and International Levels, A/RES/67/1, 30 November 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Declaration on Principles of International Law Friendly Relations and Cooperation among states in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, A/RES/2625(XXV), 24 October 1970 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Millennium Declaration, A/RES/55/2, 18 September 2000 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, The Rule of Law at the National and International Levels, A/RES/69/123, 18 December 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, A/RES/3/217A, 10 December 1948 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL, Report of the Secretary-General on the Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, S/2004/616, 23 August 2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
VAN HARTEN, GUS, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford, 2007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
VAN HARTEN, GUS, Investment Treaty Arbitration, Procedural Fairness, and the Rule of Law, in: Schill, Stephan W. (ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law, Oxford, 2010, pp. 627-658 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
WAIBEL, MICHAEL; KAUSHAL, ASHA; CHUNG, KYO-HW; BALCHIN, CLAIRE (eds.), The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
WALDRON, JEREMY, The Law, London/New York, 1990 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
WATTS, ARTHUR, The International Rule of Law, German Yearbook of International Law 1993, 1994, vol. 36, pp. 15-45 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
ZURN, MICHAEL; NOLLKAEMPER, ANDRE; PEERENBOOM, RANDY (eds.), Rule of Law Dynamics in an Era of International and Transnational Governance, Cambridge, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-337
ANDERSON, SCOTT; FRIEDBACHER, TODD; LAU, CHRISTIAN; LOCKHART, NICOLAS; REMY, JAN YVES; SANDFORD, IAIN, Using Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU to Ensure the Availability of Appeals, CTEI Working Paper CTEI-2017-17, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
BHATIA, SINGH, The Problems of Plenty, Challenging Times for the WTO’s Dispute Settlement System, available at: https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/ab_08jun17_e.pdf (14/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, LAURENCE, Arbitration at the WTO: A Terra Incognita to be Further Explored, in: Charnovitz, Steve; Steger, Debra P; Van den Bossche, Peter (eds.), Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in honour of Florentino Feliciano, Cambridge, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
DAVEY, WILLIAM, The WTO Dispute Settlement System: The First Ten Years, Journal of International Economic Law, 2005, vol. 8, pp. 17-50 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
GREENWALD, JOHN, A Comparison of WTO and CIT/CAFC Jurisprudence in Review of U.S. Commerce Department Decisions in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 2013, vol. 21, pp. 261-272 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
GREENWALD, JOHN, WTO Dispute Settlement: an Exercise in Trade Law Legislation?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 113-124, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/6.1.113 (14/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
HAHN, MICHAEL, For Whom the Bell Tolls: The WTO’s Third Decade, in: Elsig, Manfred; Hahn, Michael; Spilker, Gabriele (eds.), The shifting landscape of global trade governance, Cambridge, pp. 121-154 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
HAHN, MICHAEL, We'll Always have Geneva: The Existential Crisis of the US-led Multilateral Trading System and the EU Reactions, in: Govaere, Inge; Garben, Sacha, The Interface between EU and International Law, 2019, pp. 269-292 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
HOWSE, ROBERT, The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary, European Journal of International Law, 2016, vol. 27, pp. 9-77 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
HOWSE, ROBERT; MAVROIDIS, PETROS C., Europe's Evolving Regulatory Strategy For GMOs – The Issue Of Consistency With WTO Law: Of Kine And Brine, Fordham Int'l L.J. 2000/24(2), pp. 317 – 370 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
MATSUSHITA, MITSUO; SCHOENBAUM, THOMAS J.; MAVROIDIS, PETROS C.; HAHN, MICHAEL, The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy, 3rd edition, Oxford, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
MAVROIDIS, PETROS C., Regulatory Cooperation: Lessons from the WTO and the World Trade Regime, E15 Task Force on Regulatory Systems Coherence – Policy Options Paper. E15Initiative. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
PAYOSOVA, TETYANA; HUFBAUER, GARY CLYDE; SCHOTT, JEFFREY J., The Dispute Settlement Crisis in the World Trade Organization: Causes and Cures, PIIE Policy Brief 18-5, March 2018, available at: https://piie.com/system/files/documents/pb18-5.pdf (20/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
PRUSA, THOMAS; VERMULST, EDWIN, ‘United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China: Passing the Buck on Pass-Through’, World Trade Review, 2013, vol. 12, pp. 197–234 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
VAN DAMME, ISABELLE, Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body, Oxford, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
VAN DEN BOSCHE, PETER; ZDOUC, WERNER, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization. Text, Cases and Materials, 4th edition, Cambridge, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
WILLIAM, DAVEY J., The Limits of Judicial Processes, in: Bethlehem, Daniel; Van Damme, Isabelle; McRae, Donald; Neufeld, Rodney, (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, Oxford, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
YERXA, RUFUS; WILSON, BRUCE, Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement. The First Ten Years, Oxford, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-349
FITSCHEN, THOMAS, Inventing the Rule of Law for the United Nations, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law online, 2008, Vol. 12 (1), pp. 347-380 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-369
LAUTENBACH, GERANNE, The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-369
MANUSAMA, KENNETH, The United Nations Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era: Applying the Principle of Legality, Legal Aspects of International Organization, Vol. 47, Leiden, 2006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-369
AHMETAJ, HYSNI, Legal Certainty and Legitimate Expectation in EU Law, Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 2014, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 20-25 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
BARD, PETRA; CARRERA, SERGIO; GUILD, ELSPETH; KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, An EU mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights, Brussels, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
BUNGENBERG, MARC, Vertrauensschutz, in: Heselhaus, F.S.M.; Nowak, Carsten (eds.), Handbuch der Europäischen Grundrechte, München, 2006, pp. 945 – 967 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
BUNGENBERG, MARC; REINISCH, AUGUST, From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, Heidelberg, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
BUNGENBERG, MARC; TITI, CATHERINE, CETA Opinion – Setting Conditions for the Future of ISDS (05/06/2019), available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/ceta-opinion-setting-conditions-for-the-future-of-isds/ (05/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
CRABIT, EMMANUEL; BEL, NICOLLAS, The EU Rule of Law Framework, in: Schroeder, Werner (ed.), Strengthening the Rule of Law in Europe: From a Common Concept to Mechanisms of Implementation, Portland, Oregon, 2016, pp. 197 – 206 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, European Committee on Legal Co-operation (CDCJ), available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cdcj/activities/judicial-independence-impartiality/conference-sofia2016 (05/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
DEPARTMENT OF PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS, United Nations, The United Nations Rule of Law Indicators, Geneva, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
ECHANDI, ROBERTO, ‘What Do Developing Countries Expect from the International Investment Regime?’ in: Alvarez, Jose E.; Sauvant, Karl P. (eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime: Expectations, Realities, Options, New York, 2011, pp. 3 – 21 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Investment, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/accessing-markets/investment/ (09/04/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Rule of Law Framework, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/effective-justice/rule-law/rule-law-framework_en (04/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, The EU’s Rule of Law toolbox, Factsheet, April 2019, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rule_of_law_factsheet_1.pdf (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
GOLDSTON, VERONIKA SZENTE, Rule of law: EU 'mechanism' needs upgrade, available at: https://euobserver.com/opinion/123526 (04/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
GRIEBEL, JORN, Internationales Investitionsrecht, Munich, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
HAHN, MICHAEL, Art. 207 TFEU, para. 4 f., in: Callies, Chrisitian; Ruffert, Matthias (eds.), EUV/AEUV – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta. Kommentar 4th edition, Munich, 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
HILLION, CRISTOPHE, Overseeing the rule of law in the European Union, European Policy Analysis, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 1-16 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
HOLTERHUS, TILL PATRICK, The Legal Dimensions of Rule of Law Promotion in EU Foreign Policy- EU Treaty Imperatives and Rule of Law Conditionality in the Foreign Trade and Development Nexus, in: Holterhus, Till Patrick, (ed.), The Law Behind Rule of Law Transfers,1st edition, Baden-Baden, 2019, pp. 73-111 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
KARAGEORGOU, VASILIKI, Transparency principle as an evolving principle of EU law: Regulative contours and implications, available at: https://www.right2info.org/resources/publications/eu-karageorgou-vasiliki-transparency-principle-as-an-evolving-principle-of-eu-law/view (05/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
KAUFMANN-BÜHLER, WERNER, Art. 21 TEU, para. 6, in: Grabitz, Eberhard; Hilf, Meinhard; Nettesheim, Martin (eds.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union: EUV/AEUV, 46th suppl. 2011 (‘Selbstbindung’) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, Busting the myths nuclear: A commentary on Article 7 TEU, EUI Working Papers, 2017, vol. 10, pp. 1-13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
KOCHENOV, DIMITRY; PECH, LAURENT, Monitoring and Enforcement of the Rule of Law in the EU: Rhetoric and Reality, European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 512 – 540 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
KOCHENOV, DIMITRY, The EU Rule of Law: Cutting Paths Through Confusion, Erasmus Law Review, 2009, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 5 – 24 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
KRAJEWSKI, MARKUS, The Reform of the Common Commercial Policy, in: Biondi, Andrea; Eeckhout, Piet; Ripley, Stefanie (eds.), EU-Law After Lisbon, New York, 2012, pp. 292 – 311 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
LENAERTS, KOEN, The Kadi Saga and the Rule of Law within the EU, SMU Law Review, 2014, vol. 67, pp. 707 – 715 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
PECH, LAURENT, Rule of Law as a Guiding Principle of The European Union’s External Action, The Hague, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
PECH, LAURENT, The Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of the European Union, New York, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
SATTOROVA, MAVLUDA, International Investment Treaties and the Promise of Good Governance: Norm and Institutional Design, Internalisation, and Domestic Rule-Making, ESIL Conference Paper Series, 2014, vol. 4, no. 11, 10th Anniversary Conference, Vienna, 4-6 September 2014, pp. 1-16 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
SAUTER, WOLF, Proportionality in EU Law: A Balancing Act? Tilburg University, TILEC Discussion Paper, DP 2013-003, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
STREET, AMY, Judicial Review and the Rule of Law, London, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
SCHMIDT-AΒMANN, EBERHARD, Der Rechtstaat, in: Isensee, Josef; Kirchhof, Paul (eds.), Handbuch des Staatsrechts, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 541 – 612 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
TIMMERMANS, FRANS, Keynote speech at Conference on the Rule of Law, Tilburg University, 31 August 2015, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission /commissioners/2014-2019/timmermans/announcements/european-union-and-rule-law-keynote-speech-conference-rule-law-tilburg-university-31-august-2015_en (03/03/2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
VON DANWITZ, THOMAS, The Rule of Law in the Recent Jurisprudence of the ECJ, Fordham International Law Journal, 2014, vol. 37, issue 5, pp. 1312 – 1347 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
VEDDER, CHRISTOPH, Ziele der Gemeinsamen Handelspolitik und Ziele des auswärtigen Handelns, in: Herrmann, Cristoph/ Krenzler/ Horst G./ Streinz, Rudolf (eds.), Die Außenwirtschaftspolitik der Europäischen Union nach dem Verfassungsvertrag, Baden-Baden, 2006, pp. 43-62 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
VEDDER, CHRISTOPH, Linkage of the Common Commercial Policy to the General Objectives for the Union’s External Action, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Herrmann, Christoph (eds.), European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Special Issue: Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon, Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 115-144 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-383
ASH, ADRIAN, Why Europe IS Really Freaked Out Over A Greek Default, Forbes, 15/07/2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
AUGUSTIN, PATRICK, Credit Default Swaps: A Survey, Foundations and Trends in Finance, 2014, vol. 9 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
BARTHOLOMEW, HELEN; DEVASABI, KRIS, Isda faces member backlash on margin lobbying, 25/05/2018, available at: http://www.risk.net/node/5636116 (22/03/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
BELL, RICK, Delaware LLC Privacy: What’s on Public Record?, available at: https://bit.ly/2UPzURI (21/03/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
BIGGINS, JOHN; SCOTT, COLIN, Private Governance, Public Implications and the Tightrope of Regulatory Reform: The ISDA Credit Derivatives Determinations Committees, Osgoode CLPE Research Paper, 2013, vol. 57 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
DAVIDOFF SOLOMON, STEVEN, A Fight Over Argentina’s Debt Produces No Winners, The New York Times, 21/12/2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
DURKEE, MELISSA J, Astroturf Activism, Stanford Law Review, 2017, vol. 69, pp. 201 – 268 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
ENGERT, ANDREAS, Private Normsetzungsmacht. Die Standardisierung von Regelungen im Markt als Form einer Fremdbestimmung, Rechtswissenschaft, 2014, vol. 3, pp. 301 – 340 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
ESPOSITO, CARLOS; LI, YUEFEN; BOHOSLAVSKY, JUAN PABLO, Sovereign Financing and International Law: The UNCTAD Principles on Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
FONTEVECCHIA, AUGUSTINO, Greece’s Inevitable Default Won’t Trigger CDS, So What’s The Point Of Protection?, Forbes, 22/07/2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
GELPERN ANNA, A Sensible Step to Mitigate Sovereign Bond Dysfunction, 29/08/2014, available at: https://bit.ly/2WME5ha (19/06/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
GELPERN, ANNA; GULATI, MITU, CDS Zombies, European Business Organization Law Review, 2012, vol. 13 pp. 347 – 390 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
GELPERN, ANNA; HALLER, BEN; SETSER, BRED, Count the Limbs: Designing Robust Aggregation Clauses in Sovereign Bonds, in: Guzman, Martin/Ocampo, José Antonio/Stiglitz, Joseph E (eds.), Too Little, Too Late: The Quest to Resolve Sovereign Debt Crises, New York Chichester, 2016, pp. 109 – 143 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
GOODMAN, LAWRENCE, Perils of Precedent: Threat of the Sovereign Bond Market, Emerging Markets Trade Association, New York, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
GRUSZCYŃSKI, LUKASZ; MENKES, MARCIN J, Hybrid Recognition of Monetary and Financial Sovereignty Or is it?, in: Czapliński, Władysław,/Kleczkowska, Agata (eds.), Unrecognized subjects in international law, Warsaw, 2019, pp. 371 – 391 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
HALE, THOMAS, When finance becomes a beneficiary of the green agenda, Financial Times, 05/01/2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
HAVEL, VACLAV, The Power of Powerless, 1978 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
HU, HENRY TC, Misunderstood Derivatives: The Causes of Informational Failure and the Promise of Regulatory Incrementalism, The Yale Law Journal 1993, vol. 102(6), pp. 1457 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
HU, HENRY TC, Reform the credit default swap market to rein in abuses, Financial Times, 24/02/2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
INDAP, SUJEET; SMITH ROBERT, Contentious legal ruling puts Windstream at risk of bankruptcy, Financial Times, 17/02/2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
JEWETT, MARK; PEIHANI, MAZIAR, How Ontario Could Leave the World in Sovereign Debt Restructuring, Policy Brief 108, Centre for International Governance Innovation, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
JUDGE, KATHRYN, Intermediary Influence, The University of Chicago Law Review 2015, vol. 82, pp. 573 – 642 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
KIBBE, RICHARD; GRADY, JENNIFER; LEE, RICHARD J, Sovereign CDS: lessons from the Greek debt crisis, Lexology, available at: https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e9c8eae6-b2ad-4fe7-9a9f-9f299cd2607f (10/03/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
LESSIG, LAWRENCE, Republic, lost: how money corrupts Congress – and a plan to stop it, New York, 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
LIENAU, ODETTE, Rethinking Sovereign Debt. Politics, Reputation and Legitimacy in Modern Finance, Cambridge, London, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
MAKOFF, GREGORY; KAHN, ROBERT, Sovereign Bond Contract Reform. Implementing the New ICMA Pari Passu and Collective Action Clauses, CIGI Papers, 2015, vol. 56 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
MCCORMICK, LIZ; GREIFELD, KATHERINE, Hidden Bond Market Dangers Expose Traders to $2 Trillion Wipeout, Bloomberg Business Week, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
MENKES, MARCIN J, Reforma systemów nadzoru finansowego UE I USA ze szczególnym uwzglednieniem kryzysu z lat 2007-2008, International Journal of Management and Economics, 2013, vol. 37, pp. 130-151 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
MENKES, MARCIN J, “Dobrzy, zli i brzydcy”. Prawne kontrowersje wokól restrukturyzacji argentynskich obligacji’, Przeglad Prawa Handlowego, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 31-37 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
MENKES, MARCIN J, Rule of Law in International Monetary and Financial Law: New(ish) Solution and Old Mistakes, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
NORTH, DOUGLASS C; THOMAS, ROBERT PAUL, The Rise of the Western Wolrd: A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press, 1973 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
PARK, STEVENS, Investors as Regulators: Green Bonds and the Governance Challenges of the Sustainable Finance Revolution, Stanford Journal of International Law, 2018, vol. 54, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3142887 (23/03/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
PARTNOY FRANK, ISDA, NASD, CFMA and SDNY: The Four Horsemen of Derivatives Regulations?, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper, 2002, vol. 39, available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=293085 (23/03/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
PEACOCK, NICHOLAS, Derivatives Disputes: ISDA revises Arbitration Guide, expanding the model arbitration clauses, 19/12/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2HFAYVc (23/03/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
PORZECANSKI, ARTURO C, Buenos Aires to Athens: The Road to Perdition, Washington, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
RENNISON, JOE, “Manufactured” credit default calles off after legal challenge, Financial Times, 30/05/2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
RENNISON, JOE; INDAP SUJEET, Wall Street tries to clean up $8tn market for credit derivatives, Financial Times, 14/03/2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
RILES, ANNELISE, The Anti-Network: Private Global Governance, Legal Knowledge and the Legitimacy of the State, The American Journal of Comparative Law 2008, vol. 56(3), pp. 605 – 630 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
ROSE, PAUL, Certifying the “Climate” in climate bonds, Capital Market Law Journal, 2019, vol. 14, pp. 59 – 77 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
SCHUPPERT, GUNNAR FOLKE, From Plurality of Normative Orders to Plurality of Norm Producers, The World of Rules, 2017, pp. 137 – 194 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
SLAUGHTER, ANNE-MARIE, A New World Order, Princeton University Press, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
SMITH, ROBERT, Isda’s whack-a-mole fixes for credit default swaps merit scrutiny, Financial Times, 08/03/2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
SNYDER, TIMOTHY, The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America, Vintage Digital, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
SOBEL, MARK, Strengthening collective action clauses: catalysing change – the back story, Capital Markets Law Journal, 2016, vol. 11, pp. 3- 11 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
STIGLITZ, JOSEPH E; GUZMAN, MARTIN, A Step Forward for Sovereign Debt, 09/11/2015, available at: https://bit.ly/2GYPcOn (30/04/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
STIGLITZ, JOSEPH E; GUZMAN, MARTIN, A Rule of Law for Sovereign Debt, Project Syndicate, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
STOLPER, ANTONIA E; DOUGHERTY, SEAN, Collective action clauses: how the Argentina litigation changes the sovereign debt markets, Capital Markets Law Journal, 2017, 12, pp. 239 – 252 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
SZTOMPKA, PIOTR, Zaufanie. Fundament spo leczenstwa, Znak, 2007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
VERDIER, PIERRE-HUGUES, Credit Derivatives and the Sovereign Debt Restructuring Process, Harvard Law School, 2004 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
WAIBEL, MICHAEL, Sovereign defaults international courts and tribunals│ Public international law, Cambridge University Press, 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
WAIBEL, MICHAEL, Steering sovereign debt restructurings through the CDS quicksand, Journal of Banking Regulation, 2014, vol. 15, pp. 14 – 40 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
WEIDEMAIER, MARK C; SCOTT, ROBERT E; GULATI, G MITU, Origin Myths, Contracts and the Hunt for Pari Passu, UNC Legal Studies Research Paper 1633439, 2011, available at: https://bit.ly/2IRbxRg (19/03/2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
WIELSCH, DAN, Global Law’s Toolbox: Private Regulation by Standards, The American Journal of Comparative Law 60, pp. 1075 – 1104 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-407
ASBRAND, DOMINIK; NEHRING-KÖPPL, JAN, Die Neuregelung der Kontrolle von Unternehmenstransaktionen – Beitrag zur Reform der sektorübergreifenden Investitionskontrolle gem. §§ 55-59 AWV, Zeitschrift für Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht IWRZ, 2018, S. 63 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BAYER, WALTER; OHLER, CHRISTOPH, Staatsfonds ante portas, Zeitschrift für Gesetzgebung, 2008, S. 12 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BECKER, FLORIAN; SACHS, BÄRBEL, Die Investitionsprüfung nach Änderung der AWV – offene Fragen aus Perspektive der Transaktionspraxis, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 1336 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BERG, CAI; SIMON, BJÖRN, Auswirkungen der Änderungen des Außenwirtschaftsgesetzes auf die M&A-Vertragspraxis, M&A Review 2009, S. 159 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BICKENBACH, FRANK; LIU, WAN-HSIN, Chinese Direct Investment in Europe – Challenges for EU FDI Policy, CESifo Forum 4/2018, S. 15-22 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BOEWE, MARIUS; JOHNEN, CHRISTIAN, Die Änderung der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung und deren Relevanz für Unternehmenskäufe, Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 1095 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BRAUNECK, JENS, Ausländische Direktinvestitionen nur mit Einverständnis der EU-Kommission?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, S. 188 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
BUNDESVERBAND DER DEUTSCHEN INDUSTRIE E.V. (BDI) (Hrsg.), Mehr Schutz vor ausländischen Investoren? – Wirtschaftliche und EU-rechtliche Aspekte der geplanten Beschränkung ausländischer Beteiligungen an deutschen Unternehmen, Berlin, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
CALLIESS, CHRISTIAN; RUFFERT, MATTHIAS (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV – Das Verfassungsrecht der Europäischen Union mit Europäischer Grundrechtecharta, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
CENTRUM FÜR EUROPÄISCHE POLITIK (cep), Proposal COM(2017) 487 of 13 September 2017 for a Regulation establishing a framework for screening of foreign direct investments into the European Union, cepPolicyBrief No. 2017-32 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
CLOSTERMEYER, MAXIMILIAN, Staatliche Übernahmeabwehr und die Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit zu Drittstaaten, Baden-Baden, 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
DAMMANN DE CHAPTO, JANA K.; BRÜGEMANN, NIKLAS, Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Investitionskontrollrecht – Der „Fall Leifeld“ und die öffentliche Sicherheit, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht, 2018, S. 412 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
DE KOK, JOCHEM, Towards a European Framework for Foreign Investment Reviews, European Law Review, 2019, S. 24 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
DIRNHAUSEN, FLORIAN; ECKSTEIN, HANS-MARTIN (Hrsg.), Beck’sches Handbuch der AG, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
DOLZER, RUDOLF; SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH, Principles of International Investment Law, 2. Auflage, Oxford, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
EDITORIAL COMMENTS, Playing by the rules – Free and fair trade, CMLRev. 2018, Vol. 55, S. 373 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
EHLERS, DIRK (Hrsg.), Europäische Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten, 4. Auflage, Berlin u.a., 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
GERMELMANN, CLAAS FRIEDRICH, Konkurrenz von Grundfreiheiten und Missbrauch von Gemeinschaftsrecht – Zum Verhältnis von Kapitalverkehrs- und Niederlassungsfreiheit in der neueren Rechtsprechung, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2008, S. 596 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
GRABITZ, EBERHARD; HILF, MEINHARD; NETTESHEIM, MARTIN (Hrsg.), Das Recht der Europäischen Union, 65. EL, München, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
GRIEBEL, JÖRN, Internationales Investitionsschutzrecht, München, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
GÜNTHER, VALENTIN, Der Vorschlag der Europäischen Kommission für eine Verordnung zur Schaffung eines Rahmens für die Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen in der Europäischen Union – Investitionskontrolle in der Union vor dem Hintergrund kompetenzrechtlicher Fragen, Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, Heft 157 (08-2018), Halle (Saale) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Die Zukunft der mitgliedstaatlichen Investitionspolitik nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2010, S. 207 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
HINDELANG, STEFFEN; HAGEMEYER, TEOMAN M., Enemy at the Gates? Die aktuellen Änderungen der Investitionsprüfvorschriften in der Außenwirtschaftsverordnung im Lichte des Unionsrechts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2017, S. 882 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
HINDELANG, STEFFEN, Gestufte Freiheitsverbürgung? Art. 63 Abs. 1 AEUV (Ex-Art. 56 Abs. 1 EG) im Drittstaatenkontext, Internationales Steuerrecht, 2010, S. 443 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
HINDELANG, STEFFEN, The Free Movement of Capital and Foreign Direct Investment: The Scope of Protection in EU Law, Oxford, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
HOOK, CHRISTOPHER, Was lange währt wird endlich gut? Die neuen Änderungsverordnungen im Bereich der handelspolitischen Schutzinstrumente, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 188 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
JOHANNSEN, SVEN LEIF ERIK, Der Investitionsbegriff nach Art. 25 Abs. 1 der ICSID-Konvention, Beiträge zum Transnationalen Wirtschaftsrecht, 2009, Heft 87 (04-2009), Halle (Saale) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
JOHANNSEN, SVEN LEIF ERIK, Die europarechtliche Bewertung der beabsichtigen erneuten Reform des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur Kontrolle ausländischer Beteiligungen an Betreibern kritischer Infrastrukturen (Teil 1), Infrastrukturrecht, 2018, S. 225 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
JOHANNSEN, SVEN LEIF ERIK, Die europarechtliche Bewertung der beabsichtigten erneuten Reform des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur Kontrolle ausländischer Beteiligungen an Betreibern kritischer Infrastrukturen (Teil 2), Infrastrukturrecht, 2018, S. 247 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
KAHL, WOLFGANG; SCHWIND, MANUEL, Europäische Grundrechte und Grundfreiheiten – Grundbausteine einer Interaktionslehre, EuropaRecht, 2014, S. 170 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
KEMMERER, MARTIN, Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit und Drittstaaten, Baden-Baden, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
KIRSCHNER, JULIA, Grundfreiheiten und nationale Gestaltungsspielräume – Eine Analyse der Rechtsprechung des EuGH, München, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
KRENZLER, HORST GÜNTHER; HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH; NIESTEDT, MARIAN (Hrsg.), EU-Außenwirtschafts und Zollrecht, 12. Auflage, München, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
KROLOP, KASPAR, Schutz vor Staatsfonds und anderen ausländischen Kapitalmarktakteuren unter Ausblendung des Kapitalmarktrechts?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 2008, S. 40 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
LECHELER, HELMUT; GERMELMANN, CLAAS FRIEDRICH, Zugangsbeschränkungen für Investitionen aus Drittstaaten im deutschen und europäischen Energierecht, Tübingen, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
MARTINI, MARIO, Zu Gast bei Freunden?: Staatsfonds als Herausforderung an das europäische und internationale Recht, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 2008, S. 314 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL; HERRMANN, CHRISTOPH, Die Entwicklung des europäischen Außenwirtschaftsrechts, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2018, S. 749 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
MÜLLER-IBOLD, TILL, Foreign Investment in Germany: Restrictions Based on Public Security Concerns and Their Compatibility with EU Law, European Yearbook of International Economic Law, 2010, S. 103 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
NETTESHEIM, MARTIN, Unternehmensübernahmen durch Staatsfonds: Europarechtliche Vorgaben und Schranken, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handels- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2008, S. 729 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
PANDEY, GIANI; ROVETTA, DAVIDE; SMIATACZ, AGNIESZKA, How Many Barriers Should a Steeple Chase Have? Will the EU’s Proposed Regulation on Screening of Foreign Direct Investments Add yet More Delaying Barriers When Getting a Merger Deal through the Clearance Gate, and Other Considerations, Global Trade and Customs Journal 2019, Vol. 14, S. 56 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
PECHSTEIN, MATTHIAS; NOWAK, CARSTEN; HÄDE, ULRICH (Hrsg.), Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV, Tübingen, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
ROSENFELDT, HERBERT; WÜRDEMANN, AIKE, Schöpfer des Binnenmarktes im Käfig der Verträge – Die grundfreiheitliche Bindung des EU-Gesetzgebers, EuropaRecht, 2016, S. 453 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
ROTH, WULF-HENNING, Investitionsbeschränkungen im deutschen Außenwirtschaftsrecht, Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft, 2009, S. 257 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SCHILL, STEPHAN W., The European Union’s Foreign Direct Investment Screening Paradox: Tightening Inward Investment Control to Further External Investment Liberalization, Legal Issues of Economic Intergration 2019, Vol. 46, S. 105 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SCHLADEBACH, MARCUS; BECKER, FREDERIKE, Die Verschärfung der Investitionskontrolle im deutschen und europäischen Außenwirtschaftsrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 1076 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SCHÖNFELD, JENS, Besteuerung von Dividenden, die von einer in einem Drittstaat ansässigen Gesellschaft gezahlt werden, Internationales Steuerrecht, 2007, S. 441 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SCHROEDER, WERNER (Hrsg.), Europarecht als Mehrebenensystem – Beiträge zum 7. Österreichischen Europarechtstag 2007, Baden-Baden, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SCHUELKEN, TOBIAS, Der Schutz kritischer Infrastrukturen vor ausländischen Direktinvestitionen in der Europäischen Union. Zum Vorschlag der EU-Kommission für eine Verordnung zur Schaffung eines Rahmens für die Überprüfung ausländischer Direktinvestitionen – KOM(2017) 487 endg., EuropaRecht, 2018, S. 577 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SLOBODENJUK, DIMITRI, Weitere Verschärfung der Investitionskontrolle in Deutschland – ein praxisrelevanter Überblick, Betriebs-Berater, 2019, S. 202 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
STREINZ, RUDOLF (Hrsg.), EUV/AEUV – Vertrag über die Europäische Union, Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
SUMMERSBERGER, WALTER; MERZ, MATTHIAS; JATZKE, HARALD; ACHATZ, MARKUS (Hrsg.), Außenwirtschaft, Verbrauchersteuern und Zoll im 21. Jahrhundert – Festschrift für Hans-Michael Wolffgang zum 65. Geburtstag, Köln, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
THOMAS, STEFAN, Die Relevanzregel in der europäischen Grundfreiheitendogmatik – Zur Frage eines Spürbarkeitserfordernisses bei der Beeinträchtigung von Grundfreiheiten, Neue Verwaltungszeitschrift, 2009, S. 1202 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
VOLAND, THOMAS, Freitag, der Dreizehnte – Die Neuregelungen des Außenwirtschaftsrechts zur verschärften Kontrolle ausländischer Investitionen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2009, S. 519 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
VOLAND, THOMAS, Rechtsschutz gegen Maßnahmen der Investitionskontrolle im Außenwirtschaftsrecht – Fiat iustitia?!, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 2010, S. 132 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
VON ARNAULD, ANDREAS (Hrsg.), Europäische Außenbeziehungen, in: Hatje, Armin; Müller-Graff, Peter-Christian (Gesamt-Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie Europarecht, 2014, Band 10 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
VON DER GROEBEN, HANS; SCHWARZE, JÜRGEN; HATJE, ARMIN (Hrsg.), Europäisches Unionsrecht – Vertrag über die Europäische Union, Vertrag über die Arbeitsweise der Europäischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europäischen Union, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
VRANES, ERICH, State Measures Protecting Against „Undesirable“ Foreign Investment. Issues in EU and International Law, Zeitschrift für Öffetnliches Recht, 2012, S. 639 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
WATRIN, CHRISTOPH; EBERHARDT, DAVID, Anwendung der Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit im Bereich der internationalen Dividendenbesteuerung, Betriebs-Berater, 2014, S. 2967 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
WATRIN, EBERHARDT, Anwendung der Kapitalverkehrsfreiheit im Bereich der internationalen Dividendenbesteuerung, Betriebs-Berater, 2014, S. 2967 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
WEITNAUER, MANUEL, Die AWV-Investitionsprüfung bei M&A-Transaktionen, Gesellschafts- und Wirtschaftsrecht, 2019, S. 81 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
WELLER, MARC-PHILIPPE, Ausländische Staatsfonds zwischen Fusionskontrolle, Außenwirtschaft und Grundfreiheiten, Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht ZIP, 2008, S. 857 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
WISSENSCHAFTLICHE DIENSTE DES DEUTSCHEN BUNDESTAGES, Schutz vor ausländischen Staatsfonds, WD 7 – 178/07, 2007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
WOLFFGANG, HANS-MICHAEL; SIMONSEN, OLAF; ROGMANN, ACHIM (Hrsg.), AWR-Kommentar – Kommentar für das gesamte Außenwirtschaftsrecht, 59. EL, Köln, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-429
ALVAREZ, JOSÉ E., The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment, Hague Academy of International Law 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
ALVAREZ-JIMENEZ, ALBERTO, The WTO Appellate Body’s Decision-Making Process: A Perfect Model for International Adjudication?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2009, Vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 289-331 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
ALVAREZ ZÁRATE, JOSÉ MANUEL, Legitimacy Concerns of the Proposed Multilateral Investment Court: is Democracy Possible?, Boston College Law Review, 2018, Vol. 59, pp. 2765-2790 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BAETENS, FREYA, The European Union’s Proposed Investment Court System: Addressing Criticisms of Investor-State Arbitration While Raising New Challenges, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2016, Vol. 43, issue 4, pp. 367-384 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BEDOYA, FERNANDO/RAMÍREZ, JOSÉ LUIS, Un Sistema de Corte Permanente Como Alternativa al Arbitraje de Inversiones Ventajas y Desventajas, Revista del Club Español del Arbitraje, 2016, issue 26, pp. 39-56 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BEHN, DANIEL, Legitimacy, Evolution and Growth in Investment Arbitration: Empirically Evaluating the State-of-the-Art, Georgetown Journal of International Law, 2015, Vol. 46, pp. 363-416 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BERNARDINI, PIERO, Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement: The Need to Balance Both Parties’ Interests, ICSID Review 2017, Vol. 32, issue 1, pp. 38-57 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BOTTINI, GABRIEL, Reform of the Investor-State Arbitration Regime, in: Kalicki, Jean E./Joubin-Bret, Anna (eds.), Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System, Brill Nijhoff 2015, pp. 455-473 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BROWER, CHARLES N./AHMAD, JAWAD, From the Two-Headed Nightingale to the Fifteen-Headed Hydra: The Many Follies of the Proposed International Investment Court, Fordham International Law Journal, 2018, Vol. 41, issue 4, pp. 791-820 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BUNGENBERG, MARC/REINISCH, AUGUST, From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court: Options Regarding the Institutionalization of Investor-State Dispute Settlement, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
BUTLER, NICOLETTE/SUBEDI, SURYA, The Future of International Investment Regulation: Towards a World Investment Organisation?, Netherlands International Law Review, 2017, Vol. 64, issue 1, pp. 43-72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
CALAMITA, JANSEN, The (In)Compatibility of Appellate Mechanisms with Existing Instruments of the Investment Treaty Regime, Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2017, Vol. 18, pp. 585-627 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
CHUNG, OLIVIA, The Lopsided International Investment Law Regime and its Effect on the Future of Investor-State Arbitration, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2007, Vol. 47, issue 4, pp. 953-976 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
DOLZER, RUDOLF/SCHREUER, CHRISTOPH, Principles of International Investment Law, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
EHLERMANN, CLAUS-DIETER, Experiences from the WTO Appellate Body, Texas International Law Journal, 2003, Vol. 38, pp. 469-488 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Concept Paper: Investment in TTIP and beyond—the path for reform (5 May 2015), available at: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/may/tradoc_153408.PDF (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Multilateral Reform of Investment Dispute Resolution accompanying the document Recommendation for a Council Decision Authorising the Opening of Negotiations for a Convention Establishing a Multilateral Court for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, (Impact Assessment) SWD (2017) 302 final Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
EUROPEAN UNION, Submission of the European Union and its Member States to UNCITRAL Working Group III: Establishing a standing Mechanism for the Settlement of International Investment Disputes, 18 January 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
FACH GÓMEZ, KATIA, Unión Europea e Inversiones Internacionales: El futuro de los Mecanismos de Resolución de Controversias Inversor-Estado, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 2017, Vol. 69, issue 1, pp. 295-302 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
FITZMAURICE, MALGOSIA, The Practical Working of the Law of Treaties, in: Evans, Malcom D (ed.), International Law, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
FRANCK, SUSAN D., The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law through Inconsistent Decisions, Fordham Law Review, 2004, Vol. 73, pp. 1521-1625 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
FRANCK, SUSAN D., The Nature and Enforcement of Investor Rights Under Investment Treaties: Do Investment Treaties Have a Bright Future, University of California Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 2005, Vol. 12, pp. 47-99 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
FRANCK, SUSAN D./WYLIE, LINDSEY E., Predicting Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration, Duke Law Journal, 2015, Vol. 65, pp. 459-526 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
FRY, JAMES D./REPOUSIS, ODYSSEAS G., Towards a New World for Investor-State Arbitration through Transparency, NYUJ International Law and Politics, 2016, Vol. 48/3, pp. 795-866 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
GARCÍA-BOLIVAR, OMAR E., Permanent Investment Tribunals: The Momentum is Building up, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2064 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
GOLDHABER, MICHAEL D., Wanted: A World Investment Court, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=197 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
GONZÁLEZ GARCÍA, LUIS, Making Impossible Investor-State Reform Possible, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2029 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
HAPP, RICHARD/WUSCHKA, SEBASTIAN, From the Jay Treaty Commissions towards a Multilateral Investment Court: Addressing the Enforcement Dilemma, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 2017, Vol. VI/1, pp. 113-132 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
HOWARD, DAVID M., Creating Consistency through a World Investment Court, Fordham International Law Journal, 2017, Vol. 41, pp. 1-52 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
HOWSE, ROBERT, Designing an International Investment Court: Issues and Options, Yearbook of European Law, 2017, Vol. 36, pp. 209-236 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
HSU, LOCKNIE, Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform – Examining the Formative Aspect of Investment Treaty Commitments: Lessons from Commercial Law and Trade Law, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014, issue 1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2035 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KARTON, JOSHUA, Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Lessons from International Uniform Law, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014/1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2046 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KATZ, REBECCA LEE, Modeling an International Investment Court after the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body, Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 2016, Vol. 22, pp. 163-188 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KAUFMANN-KOHLER, GABRIELLE/POTESTA, MICHELE, Can the Mauritius Convention serve as a Model for the Reform of Investor-State Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism?, 3 June 2016, available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/CIDS_Research_Paper_Mauritius.pdf (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KAUFMANN-KOHLER, GABRIELLE/POTESTÁ, MICHELE, The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards: CIDS Supplement Report, 15 November 2017, available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/workinggroups/wg_3/CIDS_Supplemental_Report.pdf (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KAUSHAL, ASHA, Revisiting History: How the Past matters for the Present Backlash against Foreign Investment Regime, Harvard International Law Journal, 2009, Vol. 50, issue 2, pp. 491-534 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KHO, STEPHEN S./YANOVICH, ALAN/CASEY, BRENDAN R./STRAUSS, JOHANN, The EU TTIP Investment Court Proposal and the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Comparing Apples and Oranges?, ICSID Review, 2017, Vol. 32, issue 2, pp. 326-345 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
KOLB, ROBERT, The Law of the Treaties: An Introduction, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
LANGFORD, MALCOM/BEHN, DANIEL/LIE, RUNAR HILLEREN, The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration, Journal of International Economic Law, 2017, Vol. 20, issue 2, pp. 301-331 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
LEADER, SHELDON, Human Rights, Risks, and New Strategies for Global Investment, Journal of International Economic Law, 2006, Vol. 9, issue 3, pp. 657-705 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 2009, Vol. XXXV/1, pp. 33-136 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
LEE, JASMIN, Mending the Wound or Pulling it Apart? New Proposals for International Investment Courts and Fragmentation of International Investment Law, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2018, Vol. 39, issue 1, pp. 1-35 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
LOIBL, GERHARD, International Economic Law, in: Evans, Malcom D. (ed.), International Law, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press 2010, pp. 722-751 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
LÓPEZ MARTÍN, ANA GEMMA, Aplicación de tratados sucesivos concernientes a la misma materia. Análisis del artículo 30 de la Convención de Viena sobre Derecho de los Tratados, Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional, 2017, Vol. 10, pp. 51-84 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
MAVRODIS, PETROS C./WU, MARK, The Law of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Documents, Cases & Analysis, 2nd ed. American Casebook Series 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
MCRAE, DONALD, The WTO Appellate Body: A Model for an ICSID Appeals Facility?, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2010, Vol. 1, issue 2, pp. 371-387. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
MERRILLS, J. G., International Dispute Settlement, 4th ed., 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
MILES, KATE, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
PAUWELYN, JOOST, At the Edge of Chaos? Foreign Investment Law as a Complex Adaptive System, How It Emerged and How It Can Be Reformed, ICSID Review, 2014, Vol. 29, issue 2, pp. 372-418 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
PAUWELYN, JOOST, The Rule of Law without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators are from Venus, The American Journal of International Law, 2015, Vol. 109, issue 4, pp. 761-805 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
PLATT, ROWAN, The Appeal of Appeal Mechanisms in International Arbitration: Fairness over Finality?, Journal of International Arbitration, 2013, Vol. 30, pp. 531-560 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
POTESTÀ, MICHELE, Investment Arbitration, Challenges and Prospects for the Establishment of a Multilateral Investment Court: Quo Vadis Enforcement?, in: Klausegger, Christian et. al. (eds.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, pp. 157-178 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
PUIG, SERGIO/SHAFFER, GREGORY, Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law, American Journal of International Law, 2018, Vol. 112, issue 3, pp. 361-409 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
PUIG, SERGIO/STREZHNEV, ANTON, Affiliation Bias in Arbitration: An Experimental Approach, Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, Vol. 46, pp. 371-398 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
RAJPUT, ANIRUDDHA, The Myth of a Multilateral Framework in International Investment Law, Indian Journal of International Law, 2017, Vol. 56, issues 3-4, pp. 427-461 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
REINISCH, AUGUST, Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards? – The limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Vol. 19, issue 4, pp. 761-786 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
ROBERTS, ANTHEA, Incremental, Systematic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor-State Arbitration, The American Journal of International Law, 2018, Vol. 112, issue 3, pp. 410-432 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
SCHILL, STEPHAN W., The Multilateralization of International Investment Law: Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds, Trade Law and Development, 2010, Vol. 2/1, pp. 59-86 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Conceptual Framework and Options for the Way Forward, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum, 2015, available at: http://e15initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/E15-Investment-Schill-FINAL.pdf (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
SCHILL, STEPHAN W., Das TTIP-Gericht: Keimzelle oder Stolperstein für echte Multilateralisierung des internationalen Investitionsrechts?, Verfassungsblog, 25 November 2015, available at: https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2676024/168554_495440.pdf (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
SCHWIEDER, ROBERT W., TTIP and the Investment Court System: A new (and improved) Paradigm for Investor-State Adjudication, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2016, Vol. 55, pp. 178-227 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
SHAW, MALCOM N., International Law, 8th ed. Cambridge University Press 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
SHIN, HI-TAEK, Annulment, in: Kinnear, Meg et. al. (eds.), Building International Investment Law – The first 50 Years of ICSID, Kluwer Law International 2016, pp. 699-714 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
STEIN, TORSTEN/VON BUTTLAR, CHRISTIAN, Völkerrecht, 13th ed., 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
TITI, AIKATERINI (CATHARINE), The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
TITI, CATHARINE, The European Union’s Proposal for an International Investment Court: Significance, Innovations and Challenges ahead, Transnational Dispute Management, 2017/1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2427 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
TITI, CATHARINE, Procedural Multilateralism and Multilateral Investment Court: Discussion in Light of Increased Institutionalism in Transatlantic Relations, in: Fahey, Elaine (ed.), Institutionalisation Beyond the Nation State – Transatlantic Relations: Data, Privacy and Trade Law, 2018, pp. 149-164 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
TITI, CATHERINE, Who’s afraid of Reform? Beware the Risk of Fragmentation, American Journal of International Law Unbound, 2018, Vol. 112, pp. 232-236 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL, Report of Working Group III (Investor-State Settlement Reform) on the Work of its Thirty-Fourth Session (Vienna, 27 November-1 December 2017), A/CN.9/930/Rev.1, 20 April 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.142, 18 September 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Submissions from International Intergovernmental Organizations, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.143, 13 October 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Submission from the European Union, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.145, 12 December 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Submissions from International Intergovernmental Organizations and additional Information: Appointment of Arbitrators, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.146, 19 February 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Consistency and Related Matters, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.150, 28 August 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) – Arbitrators and decision-makers: Appointment mechanisms and related issues, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.152, 30 August 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Cost and Duration, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.153, 31 August 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
UNCITRAL WORKING GROUP III, Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.149, 5 September 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
VAN DEN BOSSCHE, PETER/ZDOUC, WERNER, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 3rd ed., 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
VAN HARTEN, GUS, Perceived Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration, in: Waibel, Michael et. al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2010, pp. 433-453 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
VAN HARTEN, GUS, Key flaws in the European Commission’s proposals for foreign investor protection in TTIP, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16, 2016, Vol. 12, issue 4, available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1139&context=olsrps (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
VON DER DECKEN, KERSTIN, Art. 39 VCLT, in: Dörr, Oliver/Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
VOON, TANIA, Consolidating International Investment Law: The Mega-Regionals as a Pathway Towards Multilateral Rules, World Trade Review, 2017, Vol. 17, issue 1, pp. 33-63 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
WAIBEL, MICHAEL et. al., The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, in: Waibel, Michael et. al. (eds.), The Backlash against Investment Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2010, pp. xxxvi-li Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
WUSCHKA, SEBASTIAN, Ein Investitionsgerichtshof: Der groβe Wurf der EU-Kommission?, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien, 2016/2, pp. 153-176 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477
ZULETA, EDUARDO, The Challenges of Creating a Standing International Investment Court, Transnational Dispute Management, 2014/1, available at: https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2065 (16/05/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2019-3-477