Cover of book: Co-Offending im Rahmen vorsätzlicher Tötungsdelikte
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Monograph No access

Co-Offending im Rahmen vorsätzlicher Tötungsdelikte

Eine Analyse der Tatplanung, Tatausführung und der Kommunikation im Tatvorfeld bei gemeinschaftlich begangenen Tötungsdelikten
Authors:
Publisher:
 2023

Summary

The phenomenon of co-offending has been well researched since the beginning of the last century at the latest. It is known from existing studies that so-called co-offending occurs especially in the case of property offences and that juvenile offenders make up the largest proportion of offenders that act in concert. Due to these circumstances, research has focused on these main areas for a long time. There are fewer findings on the field of violent crimes, however, especially homicides. In the opinion of various authors, a cross-crime analysis in this respect makes little sense because the differences between the crimes are too great. This study examines the phenomenon of jointly committed intentional homicides (attempted or completed) and differentiates between offences committed by groups and pairs. The offences are considered in their entirety, which means that both the pre-offence phase and the offence and post-offence phases are the subject of the study. In this way, the study aims to contribute to a better understanding of jointly committed homicides.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright Year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0464-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3958-0
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Sicherheit. Polizeiwissenschaft und Sicherheitsforschung im Kontext
Volume
14
Language
German
Pages
248
Product Type
Monograph

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 4
  2. Vorwort No access 5 - 18
  3. Abkürzungsverzeichnis No access 19 - 20
    1. Zusammenfassung No access
    2. Abstract No access
    1. 1.1 Fragestellungen No access
    2. 1.2 Aufbau der Arbeit No access
    3. 1.3 Methodische Herangehensweise No access
    1. 2.1 Klassifizierung von Tötungsdelikten No access
    2. 2.2 Co-offending im deutschen Strafrecht: Täterschaft und Teilnahme No access
    1. 3.1 Deutschland No access
    2. 3.2 International No access
      1. 4.1.1 Alter No access
      2. 4.1.2 Geschlecht No access
        1. 4.2.1.1 (Einbruch-)Diebstahl No access
        2. 4.2.1.2 Raub No access
        3. 4.2.1.3 Brandstiftung No access
        4. 4.2.1.4 Cybercrime No access
        1. 4.2.2.1 Entführungen/Kidnapping No access
        2. 4.2.2.2 Sexuelle Übergriffe/Vergewaltigung No access
      1. 4.3.1 Rational Choice No access
      2. 4.3.2 Der Einfluss von Peers No access
      3. 4.3.3 Social Exchange No access
      4. 4.3.4 Threshold Modelle No access
    4. 4.4 Wahl der Mittäter*innen No access
      1. 4.5.1 Gesellschaftliche Konsequenzen No access
      2. 4.5.2 Konsequenzen für die Geschädigten No access
      1. 5.1.1 Tötungsdelikte in kriminellen Vereinigungen am Beispiel von Gangs No access
      2. 5.1.2 Tötungsdelikte im Rahmen anderer Delikte No access
      3. 5.1.3 Tötungsdelikte, die sich gegen Fremde richten No access
        1. 5.2.1.1 Familizid No access
        2. 5.2.1.2 Siblizid No access
        3. 5.2.1.3 Filizid No access
        4. 5.2.1.4 Parentizid No access
        5. 5.2.1.5 Intimizid No access
    3. 5.3 Zwischenfazit No access
        1. 6.1.1.1 Einschlusskriterien No access
        2. 6.1.1.2 Fallauswahl No access
      2. 6.1.2 Stichprobe No access
      3. 6.1.3 Erhebungsinstrument No access
      4. 6.1.4 Datenanalyse No access
    2. 6.2 Reflexion der Methodik No access
    1. Täter*innen Freund*innen No access
    2. Täter*innen in Liebesbeziehung No access
    3. Gemischte Täter*innen-Täter*innen-Beziehung No access
        1. 7.1.1 Demografie No access
        2. 7.1.2 Vorstrafen No access
        3. 7.1.3 Psychische Auffälligkeiten und Abhängigkeiten No access
        4. 7.1.4 Familiäre Bedingungen No access
        1. 7.2.1 Konstellation, Vorstrafen und Alter der Täter*innen No access
        2. 7.2.2 Täter*innen-Täter*innen-Beziehungen No access
        3. 7.2.3 Tatvorgeschichte und Warnsignale No access
        4. 7.2.4 Täter*innen-Geschädigten-Beziehungen No access
        1. 7.3.1 Motive für die Tat(planung) No access
        2. 7.3.2 Vorteile und Risiken gemeinschaftlicher Tatbegehung No access
        3. 7.3.3 Verlauf der Entscheidungsfindung No access
        1. 7.4.1 Angaben zur initiierenden Person No access
        2. 7.4.2 Alkohol- und Drogenkonsum im Vorfeld No access
        3. 7.4.3 Gründe für die Mittäter*innenselektion No access
        4. 7.4.4 Verlauf der Offenbarung des Tatvorhabens gegenüber den Mittäter*innen No access
        5. 7.4.5 Reaktion der intendierten Mittäter*innen No access
        1. 7.5.1 Ablauf der Treffen zur Tatplanung No access
        2. 7.5.2 Umgang mit Bedenken und Konflikten No access
        3. 7.5.3 Tatvorbereitungshandlungen No access
        4. 7.5.4 Rollenverteilung im Rahmen der Tatplanung No access
    5. Der/Die Initiierende No access
    6. Der/Die Planende No access
    7. Die Fachperson No access
    8. Der/Die Wissende No access
        1. 7.6.1 Tatumstände, Tatzeit, Tatorte, Tatwaffen No access
        2. 7.6.2 Aufgabenverteilung zwischen den Täter*innen No access
        3. 7.6.3 Kommunikation während der Tat No access
        4. 7.6.4 Rollenverteilung im Rahmen der Tatausführung No access
    10. Der/Die Ausführende No access
    11. Der/Die praktisch Unterstützende No access
    12. Der/Die motivational Unterstützende No access
    13. Der/Die Beobachtende No access
        1. 7.7.1 Verhalten im unmittelbaren Nachgang zur Tat No access
        2. 7.7.2 Festnahme No access
        3. 7.7.3 Verhalten nach Verhaftung No access
        1. 7.8.1 Demografische Angaben No access
        2. 7.8.2 Verletzungen No access
      3. 7.9 Verfahren No access
        1. 7.10.1 Zusammenhänge zwischen Täter*innen-Geschädigten-Beziehung und Tatplanung No access
        2. 7.10.2 Zusammenhänge zwischen Täter*innen-Geschädigten-Beziehung und Tatausführung No access
      5. 7.11 Unterschiede zwischen den Taten von Gruppen und Dyaden No access
    15. Täter*innen und Geschädigte No access
    16. Vortatphase No access
    17. Tatphase No access
      1. 7.12 Verlauf gemeinschaftlich begangener Tötungsdelikte No access
    1. 8.1 Heterogenität der Fälle No access
    2. 8.2 Der Schwerpunkt Bandenkriminalität in internationalen Studien zu Co-offending No access
    3. 8.3 Anwendbarkeit der bestehenden Theorien zur Erklärung von Co-offending auf Tötungsdelikte No access
      1. Autorität der initiierenden Person No access
      2. Vertrauen zwischen den Mittäter*innen No access
      3. Alkohol- und Drogenkonsum im Vorfeld No access
      4. „Wir-gegen-Dich/Euch“ No access
      5. Erklärungsansätze No access
    5. 8.5 Limitationen No access
  13. Kapitel 9 Fazit und Ausblick No access 183 - 184
  14. Literaturverzeichnis No access 185 - 202
    1. A.1: Zur Datenerhebung No access
    2. 1.1 Erhebungsinstrument No access
    3. Abschnitt 1: Angaben zu den Täter:innen No access
    4. Abschnitt 2: Entscheidung zur gemeinschaftlichen Tatbegehung No access
    5. Abschnitt 3: Angaben zur Tatplanung No access
    6. Abschnitt 4: Angaben zur Tatausführung No access
    7. Abschnitt 5: Angaben zum Nachtatverhalten No access
    8. Abschnitt 6: Angaben zum Opfer/zu den Opfern No access
    9. Anschnitt 7: Angaben zum Verfahren No access
    10. A.2: Zur Datenauswertung No access
    11. A.2: Zur Datenauswertung No access
    12. 2.1 Kategorisierung der Rollen innerhalb einer Co-offending Gruppierung No access
    13. 2.1.1 Rollenverteilung pro Fall (Zeitpunkt 1: Planungsphase) No access
    14. 2.1.2 Rollenverteilung pro Fall (Zeitpunkt 2: Tatausführung) No access
    15. 2.2 Rollenentwicklung der Täter*innen von Zeitpunkt 1 (Tatplanung) zu Zeitpunkt 2 (Tatausführung) No access

Bibliography (263)

  1. Adler, C. und Polk, K. (2001). Child victims of homicide. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  2. Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01058.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  3. Ajil, A. (2022). Politico-ideological violence: Zooming in on grievances. European Journal of Criminology, 19(2), 304–321. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  4. Akers, R.L., Krohn, M.D. Lanza-Kaduce, L. und Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636–655.https://doi.org/10.2307/2094592 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  5. Akers, R.L. und Sellers, C.S. (2009). Criminological theories: introduction, evaluation, and application. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  6. Alarid, L.F., Burton, V.S. und Hochstetler, A.L. (2008). Group and solo robberies: do accomplices shape criminal form? Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.12.001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  7. Alvarez, A. und Bachman, R. (2003). Murder: American style. Thomson. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  8. Amir, M. (1971). Patterns of forcible rape. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  9. Andresen, M.A. und Felson, M. (2010). The impact of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 66- 81.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp043 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  10. Andresen, M.A. und Felson, M. (2012). An investigation into the fundamental regularities of co-offending for violent and property crime classifications. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 54, 101–115.http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.2010.E.49 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  11. Armour, M.P. (2002). Experiences of convictions of homicide: Implications for research and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 3, 109–124.https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380020032002 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  12. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2004). Sexual assault in Australia: A statistical overview. https://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/subscriber.nsf/0/C41F8B2864D42333CA256F070079CBD4/$File/45230_2004.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  13. Bard, M. (1971). The study and modification on intra-familial violence. In J.I. Singer (Hrsg.), The Control of Aggression and Violence, (S.149 – 163). Academic Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  14. Beasley, J.O., Hayne, A.S., Beyer, K., Cramer, G.L., Berson, Y.M. und Warren, J.I. (2009). Patterns of prior offending by child abductors: A comparison of fatal and non-fatal outcomes. International Journal of Law and Psychology, 32, 273–280.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.06.009 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  15. Becker, I-S., Haffner, H.T. und Mallach, H.J. (1990). Täter-Opfer-Interaktion bei Tötungsdelikten im Rahmen von Partnerschaftskonflikten. In H.J. Kerner und G. Kaiser (Hrsg.), Kriminalität. Persönlichkeit, Lebensgeschichte und Verhalten. Festschrift für Hans Göppinger zum 70. Geburtstag (253–264). Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  16. Bender, L. (1959). Children and adolescents who have killed. American Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 510–513.https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.116.6.510 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  17. Bijlenga, N. und Kleemans, E. R. (2018). Criminals seeking ict-expertise: An exploratory study of Dutch cases. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 24(3), 253–268. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  18. Bijleveld, C.C.J.H. und Hendriks, J. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: differences between group and solo offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 237–245.https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316021000030568 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  19. Block, C.R. (1985). Lethal violence in Chicago over seventeen years. Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  20. Block, C.R. (1986). Homicide in Chicago: Aggregate and time series perspectives on victim, offender and circumstance (1965–1981). Center for Urban Policy, Loyola University of Chicago. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  21. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J. und Hsieh, P. (1982). The duration of adult criminal careers. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  22. Böckler, N., Leuschner, V., Zick, A. und Scheithauer, H. (2018). Same but different? Developmental pathways to demonstrative targeted attacks – qualitative case analyses of adolescent and young adult perpetrators of targeted school attacks and Jihadi terrorist attacks in Germany. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12, 5–24.https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-180255 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  23. Boritch, H. und Hagan, J. (1990). A century of crime in Toronto: gender, class, and patterns of social control, 1859–1955. Criminology, 28, 567–599.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01339.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  24. Bricknell, S. und Bryant, W. (2018). Co-offending among young homicide offenders in Australia. Statistical Bulletin no. 12, Australian Institute of Criminology.https://www.aic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/sb_12_060718.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  25. Bricknell, S. (2019). Homicide in Australia 2015–2016. Statistical Report no. 17. Australian Institute of Criminology.https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/sr/sr17 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  26. Bricknell, S. (2020). Homicide in Australia 2017–2018. Statistical Report no. 23. Australian Institute of Criminology.https://doi.org/10.52922/sr04459 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  27. Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. Free Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  28. Browne, A. und Williams, K. (1993). Gender, intimacy and lethal violence: Trends From 1967 through 1987. Gender and Society, 41, 496–526.https://doi.org/10.1177/089124393007001005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  29. Buhrmester, D. und Furman, W. (1990). Perceptions of sibling relationships during middle childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 1387–1398.https://doi.org/10.2307/1130750 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  30. Bundeskriminalamt (2014). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2013. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2013/Standardtabellen/standardtabellenTatverdaechtige.html;jsessionid=5DBA573BB99607BE7D151131B718D01E.live291?nn=52384 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  31. Bundeskriminalamt (2015). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2014. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2014/Standardtabellen/standardtabellenTatverdaechtige.html;jsessionid=2F518B8C4FEE408A8A9B3D6092FF7D10.live291?nn=28238 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  32. Bundeskriminalamt (2016). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2015. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2015/Standardtabellen/standardtabellenTatverdaechtige.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  33. Bundeskriminalamt (2017). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2016. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2016/Standardtabellen/standardtabellenTatverdaechtige.html;jsessionid=F2BEE269326C235E2734F3993B39A4D4.live291?nn=65720 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  34. Bundeskriminalamt (2018). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2017. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2017/Standardtabellen/standardtabellenTatverdaechtige.html;jsessionid=590F997A1D186CBECCA7E54C1E9B9024.live292?nn=96600 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  35. Bundeskriminalamt (2019). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2018. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2018/Standardtabellen/standardtabellenTatverdaechtige.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  36. Bundeskriminalamt (2020). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2019. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2019/PKSTabellen/BundTV/bundTV.html?nn=131006 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  37. Bundeskriminalamt (2021). Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik 2020. Tatverdächtigentabellen, Tabelle 22. https://www.bka.de/DE/AktuelleInformationen/StatistikenLagebilder/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/PKS2020/PKSTabellen/BundTV/bundTV.html?nn=145506 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  38. Bye, E.K. (2011). Alcohol and Homicide in Europe. In M.C.A. Liem und W.A. Pridemore (Hrsg.), Handbook of European Homicide Research: Patterns, Explanations, and Country Studies (S.231 – 246). Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  39. Carrington, P.J. (2002). Group crime in Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44, 277–315.https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.44.3.277 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  40. Carrington, P.J. (2009). Co-Offending and the development of the delinquent career. Criminology, 47, 1295–1329.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00176.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  41. Carrington, P.J. und van Mastrigt, S.B. (2013). Co-offending in Canada, England and the United States: A cross-national comparison. Global Crime, 14, 123–140.https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2013.787926 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  42. Carrington, P.J. (2015). The structure of age homophily in co-offending groups. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 337–353.https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214553376 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  43. Chan, S. und Bull, R. (2013). The effect of co-offender planning on verbal deception. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21, 457–464.https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.835703 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  44. Cheatwood, D. und Block, K. (1990). Youth and homicide: an investigation of the age factor in criminal homicide. Justice Quarterly, 7, 265–292.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829000090581 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  45. Cheatwood, D. (1996). Interactional patterns in multiple-offender homicides. Justice Quarterly, 13, S. 107–128.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600092841 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  46. Clark, R.D. (1995). Lone versus multiple offending in homicide: differences in situational context. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 451–460.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(95)00034-N Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  47. Clinard, M.B. (1959). Criminological research. In R.K. Merton, L. Broom & L.S. Cottrell (Hrsg.), Sociology Today: Problems and Prospects. Basic Books Inc. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  48. Cohen, M.A., Miller, T.R. und Rossman, S.B. (1994). The costs and consequences of violent behavior in the United States. In A.J. Reiss, Jr. & J.A. Roth (Hrsg.), Understanding and Preventing Violence, Volume 4: Consequences and Control (S. 67–166). National Academy Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  49. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  50. Conway, K.P. und McCord, J. (2002). A longitudinal examination of the relation between co-offending with violent accomplices and violent crime. Aggressive Behavior, 28. 97–108.https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  51. Cook, P.J. (1976). Strategic Choice analysis of robbery. In W. Skogan (Hrsg.), Sample Surveys of the Victims of Crime. Ballinger Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  52. Cornelius, T. (2012). 10 Awful serial killer teams. Verfügbar unter: https://listverse.com/2012/07/08/10-awful-serial-killer-teams/ (zuletzt geprüft am 29.07.2021). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  53. Cullen, D. und Fritzen, K. (2019). A typology of familicidal perpetrators in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26, 970–988.https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2019.1664276 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  54. Cunningham, S.N. und Vandiver, D.M. (2018). Solo and multi-offenders who commit stranger kidnapping: an assessment of factors that correlate with violent events. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33, 3459–3479.https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516635320 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  55. Curran, K. und Millie, A. (2003). Rape and indecent assault: incidence and service provision in Southwark. Safer Southwark Partnership. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  56. Curry, D.G. und Spergel, I.A. (1988). Gang homicide, delinquency, and community. Criminology, 26, 381–405.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1988.tb00847.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  57. Dadds, M.R. und Fraser, J.A. (2006). Fire interest, fire setting and psychopathology in Australian children: A normative study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 581–586.https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01842.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  58. Daly, M., Wilson, M., Salmon, C.A., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. und Hasegawa, T. (2001). Siblicide and seniority. Homicide Studies, 5, 30–45.https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767901005001003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  59. Daly, M. und Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  60. Da Silva, T., Woodhams, J. und Harkins, L. (2014). Heterogeneity within multiple perpetrator rapes: A national comparison of lone, duo and 3+ perpetrator rapes. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 503–522.https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213497805 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  61. Dawson, J.M. und Langan, P.A. (1994). Murder in families. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington DC, US: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=791 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  62. Decker, S.H. (1993). Exploring victim-offender relationships in homicide: the role of individual and event characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 10, 585–612.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829300092031 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  63. Decker, S.H. (1995). Reconstructing homicide events: the role of witnesses in fatal encounters. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 439–450.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(95)00031-K Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  64. Decker, S.H. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243–264.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600092931 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  65. De Haan, W. und Vos, J. (2003). A crying shame: the over-rationalized conception of man in the rational choice perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 7, 29–54.https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480603007001199 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  66. DeLisi, M., Hochstetler, A., Scherer, A.M., Purhmann, A. und Berg, M.T. (2008). The starkweather syndrome: exploring criminal history antecedents of homicidal crimes sprees. Criminal Justice Studies, 221, 37–47. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  67. DeLisi, M., Kosloski, A., Sween, M., Hachmeister, E. Moore, M. und Drury, A. (2010). Murder by numbers: monetary costs imposed by a sample of homicide offenders. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 501–513.https://doi.org/10.1080/14789940903564388 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  68. Densley, J.A. (2012). The organization of London street gangs. Global Crime, 13, 42–64.https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2011.632497 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  69. Densley, J.A. (2013). How gangs work. Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  70. Densley, J.A. (2014). Its gang life, but not as we know it: the evolution of gang business. Crime & Delinquency, 60, 517–546.https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712437912 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  71. Dietz, P.E. (1986). Mass, serial and sensational homicides. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 62(5). 477–491. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  72. Dölling, D. (1984). Probleme der Aktenanalyse in der Kriminologie. In H. Kury (Hrsg.), Methodologische Probleme in der kriminologischen Forschungspraxis (S. 265–286). Heymann. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  73. Doosje, B., Moghaddam, F. M., Kruglanski, A. W., de Wolf, A., Mann, L., und Feddes, A. R. (2016). Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 79–84.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.008 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  74. Duits, N., Alberda, D. L., und Kempes, M. (2022). Psychopathology of young terrorist offenders, and the interaction with ideology and grievances. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.801751 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  75. Eagly, A.H. und Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: a meta-analytic perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167291173011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  76. Einstadter, W.J. (1969). The social organisation of armed robbery. Social Problems, 17, 64–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/799893 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  77. Empey. L.T. (1967). Delinquency theory and recent research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4, 28–42.https://doi.org/10.1177/002242786700400103 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  78. Epps, K. und Hollin, C.R. (2005). Understanding and treating adolescent firesetters. In G. Boswell (Hrsg.), Violent Children and Adolescents: Asking the Question Why? (S. 33–55). Wiley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  79. Erickson, M.L. (1971). The group context of delinquent behavior. Social Problems, 19, 114–129. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  80. Erickson, M.L. und Jensen, G.F. (1977). Delinquency is still group behavior! Towards revitalizing the group premise in the sociology of deviance. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 68, 262–273.https://doi.org/10.2307/1142849 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  81. Ewing, C.P. (1997). Fatal families: the dynamics of intrafamilial homicide. London, UK: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  82. Feeny, F. (1986). Robbers as decision-makers. In D. Cornish und R. Clarke (Hrsg.), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending (S. 53–71). Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  83. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2015). Crime in the United States: Uniform crime reports. Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  84. Federal Bureau of Investigation (2018). Crime in the United States: Uniform crime reports. Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  85. Fegadel, A.R. und Heide, K.M. (2015). Double parricide: an in-depth look at two victim homicides involving parents as victims. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33, 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2189 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  86. Felson, M. (2003). The process of co-offending. In M.J. Smith und D.B. Cornish (Hrsg.), Theory for practice in situational crime prevention (S.149 – 167). Willan Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  87. Fischhoff, B. (2003). Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgement under uncertainty. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12, 304–311.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.4.304 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  88. Fischhoff, B. und Beyth, R. (1975). „I knew it would happen“– remembered probabilities of once future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  89. Foerster, K. (2009). Erweiterter Suizid. Nervenarzt, 80, 1078–1084.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-009-2832-z Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  90. Fox, J.A. und Levin, J. (2011). Extreme killing: understanding serial and mass murder. Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  91. Franklin, K. (2004). Enacting masculinity: antigay violence and group rape as participatory theater. Sexuality Research and Social Policy: Journal of NSRC, 1, 25–40.https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.25 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  92. Frazier, S.H. (1975). Violence and social impact. In J.C.G. Scholar (Hrsg.), Research and the Psychiatric Patient (S. 191–200). Brunner & Mazel. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  93. Frydensberg, C., Ariel, B. und Bland, M. (2019). Targeting the most harmful co-offenders in Denmark: a social network analysis approach. Cambridge Journal of Evidence Based Policing, 3, 21–36.https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-019-00035-x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  94. Gebo, E. (2002). A contextual exploration of siblicide. Violence and Victims, 17, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1891/vivi.17.2.157.33649 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  95. Glaz-Ocik, J. und Hoffmann, J. (2010). Wenn Eltern ihre Kinder töten – Ein Überblick über den gegenwärtigen Kenntnisstand. In R. Steffes-enn und J. Hoffmann (Hrsg.), Schwere Gewalt gegen Kinder. Risikoanalyse & Prävention (S. 45–57). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  96. Glueck, S. und Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  97. Goetting, A. (1987). Homicidal wives. A profile. Journal of Family Issues, 8, 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251387008003006 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  98. Goetting, A. (1988). Patterns of homicide among women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 3–20.https://doi.org/10.1177/088626088003001001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  99. Goldney, R.D. (1977). Family murder followed by suicide. Forensic Science International, 3, 219–228. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  100. Göppinger, H. (1971). Kriminologie. Eine Einführung. Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  101. Gottfredson, M.R. und Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  102. Graham, K., Leonard, K.E., Room, R., Wild, T.C., Pihl, R.O., Bois, C. und Single, E. (1998). Current directions in research on understanding and preventing intoxicated aggression. Addiction, 93, 659–76.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.1998.9356593.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  103. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83F, 1420–1443.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778111 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  104. Groth, A.N. und Birnbaum, H.J. (1979). Men who rape: the psychology of the offender. New York, NY: Plenum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  105. Gurian, E.A. (2017). Offending, adjunction, and outcome patterns of solo male, solo female, and partnered mass murderers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62, 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17716375 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  106. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L.A. und Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 10–16.http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874917801003010010 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  107. Hauffe, S. und Porter, L. (2009). An interpersonal comparison of lone and group rape offences. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 469–491.https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802409339 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  108. Heide, K.M. (1989). Parricide: incidents and issues. The Justice Professional, 4, 19–41. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  109. Heide, K.M. (1992). Why kids kill parents: child abuse and adolescent homicide. Ohio State University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  110. Heide, K.M. (1993a). Juvenile involvement in multiple offender and multiple victim parricides. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 9 (2), 53–64. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  111. Heide, K.M. (1993b). Parents who get killed and the children who kill them. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, S. 531- 544.https://doi.org/10.1177/088626093008004008 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  112. Heide, K.M. (1994). Evidence of child maltreatment among adolescent parricide offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X9403800207 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  113. Heide, K.M. (1995). Dangerously antisocial youths who kill their parents. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10 (4), S. 10–14. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  114. Heide, K.M. (2013). Understanding parricide. When sons and daughters kill parents. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  115. Henderson, M. und Hewstone, M. (1984). Prison inmates` explanations for interpersonal violence: accounts and attributions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 789–794.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.52.5.789 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  116. Hickle, K.E. und Roe-Sepowitz, D.E. (2010). Female juvenile arsonists: an explanatory look at characteristics and solo and group arson offences. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 385–399.https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X473913 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  117. Hindelang, M.J. (1971). The social versus solitary nature of delinquent involvement. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 167–175. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  118. Hindelang, M.J. (1976). With a little help from their friends: group participation in reported delinquent behaviour. British Journal of Criminology, 11, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046710 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  119. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  120. Hochstetler, A. (2001). Opportunities and decisions: interactional dynamics in robbery and burglary groups. Criminology, 39, 737–763.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00939.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  121. Hochstetler, A. (2014). Co-offending and offender decision-making. In G. Bruinsma und D. Weisbrud (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice (S. 570–81). Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  122. Hoffmann, J. und Glaz-Ocik, J. (2010). Familizid – Kinder als weitere Opfer bei Tötungsdelikten durch Intimpartner. In R. Steffes-enn und J. Hoffmann (Hrsg.), Schwere Gewalt gegen Kinder – Risikoanalyse und Prävention (S. 75–91). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  123. Holleran, L.L.B. und Vandiver, D.M. (2016). U.S. homicides: multi-offenders and the presence of female offenders. Violence and Gender, 1, 27–35.https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2015.0043 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  124. Holt, T.J., Freilich, J.D. und Chermak, S.M. (2017). Exploring the subculture of ideologically motivated cyber-attackers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33, 212–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986217699100 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  125. Horvath, M.A.H. und Kelly, L. (2009). Multiple perpetrator rape: naming an offence and initial research findings. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 83–96.https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600802653818 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  126. Howell, J.C., Egley Jr., A., Tita, G.E. und Griffith, E. (2011). US gang problem trends and seriousness, 1996–2009. Bureau of Justice Assistance. US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Verfügbar unter: https://www.nationalgangcenter.gov/Content/Documents/Bulletin-6.PDF Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  127. Howell, J.C. und Griffith, E. (2018). Gangs in America’s communities (3. Auflage). Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  128. Hutchings, A. (2014). Crime from the keyboard: organised cybercrime, co-offending, initiation and knowledge transmission. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(1), 1–20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  129. Jenkins, P. (1990). Sharing murder: understanding group serial homicide. Journal of Crime and Justice, 13, 125–147.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1990.9721417 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  130. Juodis, M., Woodworth, M., Porter, S. und Brinke, L.T. (2009). Partners in crime: A comparison of individual and multi-perpetrator homicides. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 824–839.https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809337822 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  131. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 679–720.https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  132. Kazdin, A.E. und Kolko, D.J. (1986). Parent psychopathology and family functioning among childhood firesetters. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 315–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915449 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  133. Kelly, J., Lovett, J. und Regan, L. (2005). A pap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. Home Office Research Study 293. Verfügbar unter: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20110218135832/rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hors293.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  134. Knight, B.J. und West, D.J. (1975). Temporary and continuing delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 15, 43–50.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23636454 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  135. Knötzl, B., Schacherreiter, J. und Schopper, A. (2017). Der Rückschaufehler bei der richterlichen Urteilsfindung im Schadenersatzprozess. Juristische Blätter, 139, 2–10. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  136. Koenraadt, F. (1996). Parricide: an ultimate offense. Gouda Quint. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  137. Kornhauser, R. (1978). Social sources of delinquency. An appraisal of analytic models. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  138. Krakowski, M. und Czobor, P. (2004). Gender differences in violent behaviors: relationship to clinical symptoms and psychosocial factors. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 459–465.https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.459 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  139. Kunz, J. und Bahr, S.J. (1996). A profile of parental homicide against children. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 347–362.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02333422 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  140. Lantz, B. und Hutchinson, R. (2015). Co-offender ties and the criminal career: the relationship between co-offender group structure and the individual offender. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 658–690.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815576754 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  141. Lantz, B. und Ruback, R.B. (2017). The relationship between co-offending, age, and experience using a sample of adult burglary offenders. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 3, 76–97.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40865-016-0047-0 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  142. Lantz, B. (2018). The consequences of crime in company: co-offending, victim–offender relationship, and quality of violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518786497 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  143. Lantz, B. und Kim, J. (2018). Hate crimes hurt more, but so do co-offenders: separating the influence of co-offending and bias on hate-motivated physical injury. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 437–456.https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818810314 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  144. Lantz, B. (2020). Co-offending group composition and violence: the impact of sex, age, and group size on co-offending violence. Crime & Delinquency, 66, 93–122.https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719834564 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  145. Leaper, C. und Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J.E. Grusec & P.D. Hastings (Hrsg.), Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (S. 561- 587). Guilford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  146. Liem, M., Levin, J., Holland, C. und Fox, J.A. (2013). The nature and prevalence of familicide in the United States, 2000–2009. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 351–358.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9504-2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  147. Liem, M. und Reichelmann, A. (2014). Patterns of multiple family homicide. Homicidal Studies: An Interdisciplinary and International Journal, 18, 44–58.https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767913511460 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  148. Logan, J., Hill, H.A., Black, M.L., Crosby, A.E., Karch, D.L., Barnes, J.D. und Lubell, K.M. (2008). Characteristics of perpetrators in homicide-followed-by-suicide incidents: national violent death reporting system—17 states, 2003–2005. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168, 1056–1064.https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn213 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  149. Loomis, D., Wolf, S.H., Runyan, C.W., Marshall, S.W. und Butts, J.D. (2001). Homicide on the job: workplace and community determinants. American Journal of Epidemiology, 154, 410–417.https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.5.410 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  150. Lopez, V. (2008). Understanding adolescent property crime using a delinquent events perspective. Deviant Behavior, 29, 581–610.https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701839401 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  151. Lusthaus, J. (2018). Industry of anonymity: inside the business of cybercrime. Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  152. Maccoby, E.E. und Jacklin, C.N. (1980). Sex differences in aggression: a rejoinder and reprise. Child Development, 51, 964–980.https://doi.org/10.2307/1129535 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  153. Marneros, A. (2008). Intimizid. Die Tötung des Intimpartners. Ursachen, Tatsituationen und forensische Beurteilung. Schattauer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  154. Marzuk, P.M., Tardiff K. und Hirsch, C.S. (1992). The epidemiology of murder-suicide. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 3179–3183.https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480230071031 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  155. Mawson, A.R. (1987). Transient criminality: a model of stress induced crime. Praeger. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  156. Maxson, C.L., Gordon, M.A. und Klein, M.W. (1985). Differences between gang and nongang homicides. Criminology, 23, 209–222. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00334.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  158. Maxson, C.L. und Klein, M.W. (1990). Street gang violence: twice as great, or half as great? In C.R. Huff (Hrsg.), Gangs in America (S. 71–100). Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  159. Maxson, C.L. (1999). Gang homicide. A review and extension of the literature. In M. Dwayne Smith und M-A- Zahn (Hrsg.), Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research (S. 197–220). Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  160. McCarthy, B., Hagan, J. und Cohen, L.E. (1998). Uncertainty, cooperation, and crime: understanding the decision to co-offend. Social Forces, 77, 155–184.https://doi.org/10.2307/3006013 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  161. McCarthy, B. und Hagan, J. (2001). When crime pays: capital, competence, and criminal success. Social Forces, 79, 1035–1059.https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0027 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  162. McCauley, C., und Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72, 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000062 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  163. McCuish, E.C., Bouchard, M. und Corrado, R.R. (2015). The search for suitable homicide co-offenders among gang members. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 319–336.https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214553375 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  164. McGloin, J.M. und Piquero, A.R. (2009). ‘I wasn't alone’: collective behaviour and violent delinquency. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 336–353.https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.42.3.336 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  165. McGloin, J.M. und Nguyen, H. (2012). It was my idea: considering the instigation of co-offending. Criminology, 50, 463–494.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00266.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  166. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. und Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  167. Mears, D.P. und Field, S.H. (2002). A closer look at the age, peers, and delinquency relationship. Western Criminology Review, 4(1), 20–29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  168. Melde, C. und Rennison, C.M. (2008). The effect of gang perpetrated crime on the likelihood of non-lethal victim injury. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 234–251.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-008-9044-0 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  169. Melde, C. und Esbensen, F.A. (2013). Gangs and violence: disentangling the impact of gang membership on the level and nature of offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(2), 143–166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  170. Mercy, J.A. und Saltzmann, L.E. (1989). Fatal violence among spouses in the United States, 1976–1985. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 595–599.https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.79.5.595 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  171. Messner, S.F. und Golden, R.M. (1992). Racial inequality and racially disaggregated homicide rates: an assessment of alternative theoretical explanations. Criminology, 30, 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01111.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  172. Miller, W.B. (1975). Violence by youth gangs and groups as a crime problem in major American cities. National Institute of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Verfügbar unter: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/137446NCJRS.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  173. Miller, T.R., Fisher, D.A. und Cohen, M.A. (2001). Costs of juvenile violence: policy implications. Pediatrics, 107.https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.1.e3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  174. Moen, M.C. (2017). Characteristics for the identification of children who commit family murder in South Africa. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517717493 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  175. Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent anti-social behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  176. Moreland, R.L. (2010). Are dyads really groups? Small Group Research, 41, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409358618 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  177. Moreland, R.L., Hogg, M.A. und Hains, S.C. (1994). Back to the future: social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527–555.https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1025 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  178. O’Sullivan, C.S. (1991). Acquaintance gang rape on campus. In A. Parrot und L. Bechhofer (Hrsg.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime (S. 140–156). Wiley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  179. Pernanen, K. (1991). Alcohol in human violence. Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  180. Pernanen, K., Cousineau, M.M., Brochu, S. und Sun, F. (2002). Proportions of crimes associated with alcohol and other drugs in Canada. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  181. Perneger, T.V. (1998). What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal, 316, 1236–1238.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  182. Piquero, A.R., Farrington, D.P. und Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  183. Piquero, A.R. (2000). Frequency, specialization, and violence in offending careers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 392–418.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427800037004003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  184. Pollak, S. (1979). Erscheinungsformen des erweiterten Selbstmordes. Forensia, 2, 67–78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  185. Porter, L. und Alison, L.J. (2006). Examining group rape: a descriptive analysis of offender and victim behaviour. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 357–381.https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370806065586 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  186. Rasch, W. (1964). Tötung des Intimpartners. Psychiatrie-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  187. Reiss, A.J. (1980). Understanding changes in crime rates. In S.E. Fienberg und A.J. Reiss (Hrsg.), Indicators of Crime and Criminal Justice: Quantitative Studies. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  188. Reiss, A.J. (1986). Co-offender influences on criminal careers. In A. Blumenstein, J. Cohen, J.A. Rother und C.A. Visher (Hrsg.), Criminal Careers and Career Criminals (S. 121–160). National Academy Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  189. Reiss, A.J. (1988). Co-offending and criminal careers. Crime and Justice, 10, 117–170.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1147404 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  190. Reiss, A.J. und Farrington, D.P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 360–395.https://doi.org/10.2307/1143811 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  191. Rengier, R. (2022). Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil (14. Auflage). München: C.H.Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  192. Riedel, M. und Zahn, M.A. (1985). The nature and patterns of American homicide. U.S. Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  193. Resnick, P.J. (1969). Child murder in parents: a psychiatric review of filicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 325–334.https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.126.3.325 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  194. Robin, G. (1967). Gang member delinquency in Philadelphia. In M.W. Klein (Hrsg.), Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  195. Juvenile Gangs in Context: Theory, Research, and Action. Prentice-Hall. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  196. Rose, H.M. und McClain, P.D. (1990). Race, place, and risk: black homicide in urban America. SUNY Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  197. Rosenfeld, R., Bray, T.M. und Egley, A. (1999). Facilitating violence: a comparison of gang-motivated, gang-affiliated, and nongang youth homicides. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 495–516.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007548309620 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  198. Rowan, Z.R., Kan, E., Frick, P.J. und Cauffman, E. (2021). Not (entirely) guilty: the role of co-offenders in diffusing responsibility for crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1–34.https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278211046256 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  199. Rowley, J.C., Ewing, C.P. und Singer, S.I. (1987). Juvenile homicide: the need for an interdisciplinary approach. Behavioral Science and the Law, 5, 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370050102 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  200. Rozee-Koker, P. und Polk, G.C. (1986). The social psychology of group rape. Sexual Coersion and Assault, 1, 57–65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  201. Salmon, C.A. und Hehman, J.A. (2014). The evolutionary psychology of sibling conflict and siblicide. In T. K. Shackelford und R. D. Hansen (Hrsg.), Evolutionary psychology. The Evolution of Violence (S. 137–157). Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  202. Sarnecki, J. (2001). Delinquent networks: youth co-offending in Stockholm. Cambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489310 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  203. Schlang, C. (2006). Tödlich verlaufende elterliche Gewalt. Psychiatrie-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  204. Schlesinger, L.B. (2000). Familicide, depression and catathymic process. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45, 200–203. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  205. Schwartz, L.L. und Isser, N.K. (2000). Endangered children: neonaticide, infanticide, and filicide. CRC Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  206. Scully, D. und Marolla, J. (1985). Riding the bull at Gilleys: convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. Social Problems, 32, 251–263. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  207. Scully, D. (1990). Understanding sexual violence: a study of convicted rapists. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  208. Shaw, C.R. und McKay, H.D. (1931). Report on the causes of crime (2. Auflage). Government Printing Office. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  209. Shover, N. (1973). The social organisation of burglary. Social Problems, 20, 499–514. https://doi.org/10.2307/799711 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  210. Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Westview. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  211. Smith, P.H., Moracco, K. und Butts, J.D. (1998). Partner homicide in context. A population-based perspective. Homicide Studies, 2, 400–421.https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767998002004004 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  212. Soothill, K., Francis, B. und Liu, J. (2008). Does serious offending lead to homicide? Exploring the interrelationships and sequencing of serious crime. British Journal of Criminology, 48, 522–537.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azn028 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  213. Spergel, I.A. (1984). Violent gangs in Chicago: in search of social policy. Social Policy Review, 58, 199–226.https://www.jstor.org/stable/30012270 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  214. Stanovic, K.E. und West, R.F. (2001). Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  215. Steffensmeier, D. und Allan, E.A. (1996). Gender and crime: toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459–487.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.459 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  216. Steffensmeier, D., Schwartz, J., Zhong, H. und Ackerman, J. (2005). An assessment of recent trends in girls’ violence using diverse longitudinal sources: is the gender gap closing? Criminology, 43, 355–406.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00011.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  217. Stickle, T.R. und Blechman, E.A. (2002). Aggression and fire: antisocial behaviour in firesetting and nonfiresetting juvenile offenders. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioural Assessment, 24, 177–193.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016062701325 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  218. Stöckl, H., Devries, K., Rotstein, A., Abrahams, N., Campbell, J., Watts, C. und Moreno, C.G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review. Lancet, 382, 859–865.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61030-2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  219. Stolzenberg, L. und D’Alessio, S.J. (2008). Co-offending and the age-crime-curve. Journal on Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45, 65–86.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807309441 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  220. Teche, A.M.F. und Gomide, P.I.C. (2018). Abuse suffered by parricides in childhood. Psicologia Argumento, 36, 296–312.https://doi.org/10.7213/psicolargum.36.93.AO02 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  221. Terranova, V. und Vandiver, D.M. (2014). Does gender change things? Analysis of the difference between male and female violent crime for solo and co-offenders.Violence and Gender, 1, 124–130.https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2014.0010 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  222. Thrasher, F.M. (1936). The gang. Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  223. Tieger, T. (1980). On the biological basis of sex differences in aggression. Child Development, 51, 943–963.https://doi.org/10.2307/1129534 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  224. Tillyer, M.S. und Tillyer, R. (2014). Maybe I should do this alone: a comparison of solo and co-offending robbery outcomes. Justice Quarterly, 32, 1064–1088.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2014.883422 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  225. Tracy, P.E. (1988). Subcultural delinquency: a comparison of the incidence of gang and nongang member offences. In M.E. Wolfgang, T.P. Thornberry und R.M. Figlio (Hrsg.), From Boy to Man, From Delinquency to Crime. University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  226. Tremblay, P. (1993). Searching for suitable co-offenders. In R.V. Clarke und M. Felson (Hrsg.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theory (S. 17–36). Transaction Publishers. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  227. Uhnoo, S. (2016). Starting a fire together: the dynamics of co-offending in juvenile arson. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 315–331.https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370815617189 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  228. Ullman, S.E. (2007). Comparing gang and individual rapes in a community sample of urban women. Violence and Victims, 22, 43–51.https://doi.org/10.1891/vv-v22i1a003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  229. Underwood, R.C. und Patch, P.C. (1999). Siblicide. A descriptive analysis of sibling homicide. Homicide Studies, 3, 333–348.https://doi.org/10.1177/1088767999003004005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  230. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2019). Global study on homicide. Understanding homicide: typologies, demographic factors, mechanisms and contributors.https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/gsh/Booklet_3.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  231. Valasik, M. und Reid, S.E. (2020). Distinguishing between aggression in groups and in gangs: are gangs always violent? In C.A. Ireland, M. Lewis, A. Lopez und J.L. Ireland (Hrsg.), The Handbook of Collective Violence: Current Developments and Understandings (S. 273–290). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  232. Vanamo, T., Kauppi, A., Karkola, K. Merikanto, J. und Räsänen, E. (2001). Intra-familial child homicide in Finland 1970–1994: incidence, causes of death and demographic characteristics. Forensic Science International, 117, 199–204.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00408-4 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  233. Van Gelder, J.-L. (2013). Beyond rational choice: the hot/cool perspective of criminal decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 745–763.https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2012.660153 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  234. Van Mastrigt, S.B. und Farrington, D.P. (2009). Co-offending, age, gender and crime type: implications for criminal justice policy. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 552–573.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azp021 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  235. Van Mastrigt, S.B. und Farrington, D.P. (2011). Prevalence and characteristics of co-offending recruiters. Justice Quarterly, 28, 1–35.https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.482535 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  236. Van Mastrigt, S.B. (2017). Co-offending and co-offender selection. In W. Bernasco, J.L. van Gelder und H. Elffers (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Offender Decision Making (S. 338–360). Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  237. Vaughn, M.G., DeLisi, M., Beaver, K.M. und Howard, M.O. (2009). Multiple murder and criminal careers: a latent class analysis of multiple homicide offenders. Forensic Science International, 183, 67–73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.10.014 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  238. Viki, G.T. und Abrams, D. (2013). The social influence of groups on individuals. In J. L. Wood und T. A. Gannon (Hrsg.), Crime and crime reduction: The importance of group processes (S. 3–33). Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  239. Vinas-Racionero, R., Schlesinger, L.B., Scalora, M. und Jarvis, J.P. (2017). Youthful familicidal offenders: targeted victims, planned attacks. Journal of Family Violence, 32, 535–542.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9836-9 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  240. Voss, H.L. (1964). Differential association and reported delinquency behavior: a replication. Social Problems, 12, 78–85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  241. Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S. und Granhag P.A. (2010). Getting into the minds of pairs of liars and truth tellers: an examination of their strategies. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 17–22.https://doi.org/10.2174/18749178010030200017 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  242. Walsh, D. (1986). Heavy business: commercial burglary and robbery. Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  243. Warr, M. und Stafford, M. (1991). The influence of delinquent peers: what they think or what they do? Criminology, 29, 851–865.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01090.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  244. Warr, M. (1993). Parents, peers, and delinquency. Social Forces, 72, 247–264. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580168 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  245. Warr, M. (1996). Organization and instigation of delinquent groups. Criminology, 34, 11–37.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01193.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  246. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: the social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  247. Websdale, N. (2010). Familicidal hearts: the emotional styles of 211 killers. Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  248. Weerman, F. (2003). Co-offending as social exchange: explaining characteristics of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.2.398 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  249. Weerman, F. (2014). Theories of co-offending. In G. Bruinsma und D. Weisburd (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_110 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  250. Weulen Kranenbarg, M. (2022), When do they offend together? Comparing co-offending between different types of cyber-offenses and traditional offenses. Computers in Human Behavior, 130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107186 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  251. Wickramasekera, N., Wright, J., Elsey, H., Murray, J. und Tubeuf, S. (2015): Cost of crime: a systematic review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.04.009 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  252. Wilson, M., Daly, M. und Daniele, A. (1995). Familicide: the killing of spouse and children. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 275–291.https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:4<275::AID-AB2480210404>3.0.CO;2-S Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  253. Wolff, K.H. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. The Free Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  254. Wolfgang, M.E. (1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. University of Philadelphia Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  255. Woodhams, J. (2004). Characteristics of juvenile sex offending against strangers: findings from a non-clinical study. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 243–253.https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20053 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  256. Woodhams, J. (2008). Juvenile sex offending: an investigative perspective. Dissertation. Verfügbar unter: https://leicester.figshare.com/articles/thesis/Juvenile_sex_offending_an_investigative_perspective/10093151 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  257. Worchel, S., Cooper, J., Goethals, G.R. und Olson, J.M. (2000). Group dynamics. In S. Worchel, J. Cooper, G.R. Goethals und J.M.S. Olson (Hrsg.), Social Psychology (S. 411–434). Wadsworth. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  258. Wright, R. und West, D.J. (1981). Rape: a comparison of group and lone assaults. Medicine, Science and the Law, 21, 25–30.https://doi.org/10.1177/002580248102100106 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  259. Wright, R.T. und Decker, (1994). Burglars on the job: streetlife and residential break-ins. Northeastern University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  260. Wright, R., Logie, R. und Decker, S.H. (1995). Criminal expertise and offender decision making: an experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 39–53.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427895032001002 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  261. Wu, J. und Pyrooz, D.C. (2016). Uncovering the pathways between gang membership and violent victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32, 531–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9266-5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  262. Zimring, F.E. (1981). Kids, groups and crime: some implications of a well-known secret. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72, 867–885.https://doi.org/10.2307/1143269 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580
  263. Zimring, F.E. und Laqueur, H. (2014). Kids, groups, and Crime: in defense of conventional wisdom. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427814555770 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783748939580

Similar publications

from the series "Sicherheit. Polizeiwissenschaft und Sicherheitsforschung im Kontext"
Cover of book: Antiziganismus und Polizei Hamburg nach 1945
Monograph No access
Susanne Fischer
Antiziganismus und Polizei Hamburg nach 1945
Cover of book: Smart Security
Monograph No access
Moritz Huber
Smart Security
Cover of book: Migration und Polizei
Edited Book Full access
Antonio Vera, Rafael Behr, Martin Brussig, Anja Weiß
Migration und Polizei
Cover of book: Europol als Akteur in der Sicherheitsarchitektur der EU
Monograph No access
Gorden Schröder
Europol als Akteur in der Sicherheitsarchitektur der EU
Cover of book: Der grundrechtliche Schutz des Kommunikationsraums
Monograph No access
Niels Pieper
Der grundrechtliche Schutz des Kommunikationsraums

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex