Cover des Buchs: Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Teilzugriff

Enhanced Relations - Protracted Conflict(s)?

The EU's Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy (NREP) towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2019
Zum Kapiteldownload

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2019
Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8288-4304-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-8288-7236-3
Verlag
Tectum, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Wissenschaftl.Beitr.a.d.Tectum Verlag: Politikwissenschaft
Band
82
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
136
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Teilzugriff 1 - 12
    Download Kapitel (PDF)
  2. Introduction Kein Zugriff 13 - 14
  3. (Non-)Recognition of States in the International System Kein Zugriff 15 - 18
  4. EU Basis for the Recognition of Georgia and the Non-Recognition of the de facto States Kein Zugriff 19 - 21
    1. South Ossetia – Roots of the Conflict Kein Zugriff
    2. Georgian-Ossetian War Kein Zugriff
    3. Abkhazia – Roots of the Conflict Kein Zugriff
    4. From the Georgian-Abkhaz War to the Georgian-Russian War Kein Zugriff
      1. Russia’s Motives Kein Zugriff
      2. The August 2008 War under International Law Kein Zugriff
      3. Human Rights in the de facto States Kein Zugriff
    1. The EU’s Non-Recognition and Engagement Policy Kein Zugriff
    2. Georgia’s Policy towards the “Occupied Territories” Kein Zugriff
    3. United States’ Policy: Non-Recognition of “Occupied Territories” Kein Zugriff
  7. The EU’s External Governance Kein Zugriff 41 - 44
      1. Priorities of the Global Strategy Kein Zugriff
        1. Resilience as Leitmotif Kein Zugriff
        2. Implementing a Comprehensive (Integrated) Approach Kein Zugriff
      1. Establishing Relations with the South Caucasus Kein Zugriff
      2. Georgia as a Model Student Kein Zugriff
      3. The Kremlin’s View on EU Integration of Post-Soviet Countries Kein Zugriff
    3. Excursus: Information and Actions against Disinformation Kein Zugriff
    1. EU-Georgia Association Agreement and DCFTA Kein Zugriff
    2. Visa Liberalisation Kein Zugriff
    1. Emergence of a Strategy – from Soft to Hard Security Measures Kein Zugriff
      1. Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe Kein Zugriff
      2. United Nations Kein Zugriff
      1. Ceasefire Agreement Kein Zugriff
      2. The European Union Monitoring Mission to Georgia Kein Zugriff
      3. The European Union Special Representative for (the South Caucasus and) the Crisis in Georgia Kein Zugriff
      4. Crisis Management Bureaucracy Kein Zugriff
      5. The Geneva International Discussions Kein Zugriff
      6. Excursus: Other Mediation Platforms Kein Zugriff
      7. Obstacles to Conflict Resolution Kein Zugriff
        1. Current EU Programmes in Abkhazia Kein Zugriff
  11. Expert Interviews Kein Zugriff 86 - 86
  12. Conception and Evaluation of the Interviews Kein Zugriff 86 - 86
  13. Paraphrasing Kein Zugriff 87 - 87
    1. Expert A Kein Zugriff
    2. Expert B Kein Zugriff
    3. Expert C Kein Zugriff
    4. Expert D Kein Zugriff
    5. Expert E Kein Zugriff
    1. Main challenges in Abkhazia and South Ossetia Kein Zugriff
    2. NREP and Georgian Policies Kein Zugriff
    3. Enhanced Relations: Visa Liberalisation and DCFTA Kein Zugriff
    4. Russia’s Role and Influence Kein Zugriff
    5. EU Engagement in Abkhazia Kein Zugriff
    6. EU and Conflict Transformation Kein Zugriff
    7. Assessing the NREP and Recommendations Kein Zugriff
  16. Conclusion and Recommendations Kein Zugriff 115 - 121
  17. Literature Kein Zugriff 122 - 136

Literaturverzeichnis (152)

  1. Literature Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  2. Adarov Amat, Havlik Peter (2017), Challenges of DCFTAs: How can Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine succeed? (Cooperation Project Policy Brief). Wien/Gütersloh: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw)/Bertelsmann-Stiftung. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  3. Agenda.ge (21.03.2018), Georgian autopsy underway to reveal reasons behind Tatunashvili’s death. Available at: http://agenda.ge/news/97774/eng [11.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  4. Agenda.ge (15.12.2017), Georgia welcomes reinforced defence cooperation of 25 EU states. Available at: http://agenda.ge/news/92475/eng [11.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  5. Agreement between the European Union and Georgia establishing a framework for the participation of Georgia in European Union crisis management operations (EUR-Lex - 22014A0118(01)). In: Official Journal of the European Union, 18.01.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  6. Allison Roy (2009), The Russian case for military intervention in Georgia: international law, norms and political calculation. In: European Security 18/2, 173-200. London School of Economics: London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  7. Alma-Ata Declaration, 21 December 1991. In: Informatsionny Vestnik “Sodruzhestvo” 1992/1: Council of Heads of State and Council of CIS Heads of State. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  8. Almqvist Jessica (2017), EU and the Recognition of New States. In: Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI), the Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies (University of Leuven) and the Centre on Constitutional Change (CCC, Edinburgh) (Ed.), EU Borders Working Paper 12, September 2017. Available at: http://www.euborders.com/download/WorkingPaper_12_Almqvist.pdf [09.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  9. Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 30.08.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  10. Benková Livia (2018), The Rise of Russian Disinformation in Europe. In: AIES Fokus 3. Available at: https://www.aies.at/download/2018/AIES-Fokus-2018-03.pdf [08.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  11. Bentzen Naja (2017) Disinformation, ‘Fake News’ and the EU’s Response. In: European Parliamentary Research Service Blog. Available at: https://epthinktank.eu/2017/11/20/disinformation-fake-news-and-the-eus-response/ [08.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  12. Börzel Tanja A., Pamuk Yasemin, Stahn Andreas (2008), The European Union and the Promotion of Good Governance in its Near Abroad. One Sise Fits All? In: DFG Research Center (SFB) 700, Governance in areas of limited statehood. Working Paper Series No. 18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  13. Bosse Giselle (2011), The EU in Georgia: towards a coherent crisis management strategy? In: Gross Eva, Juncos Ana E. (Ed.), EU Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management. Roles, institutions and policies. London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  14. Bretherton Charlotte, Vogler John (2006), The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd Edition. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  15. Bullough Oliver (2014), This Tiny Pacific Island Nation Just Gave Russa a Big Bruise. In: The New Republic, 02.04.2014. Available at: https://newrepublic.com/article/117238/tuvalu-bruises-russia-establishing-diplomatic-ties-georgia [09.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  16. Caspersen Nina, Stansfield Gareth, Ed. (2011), Unrecognised States in the International System. Routledge: Oxon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  17. Chkhikvadze Vano (2016), The South Caucasus and the EU – different paths for each country. In: Heinrich Böll Stiftung European Union. Available at: https://eu.boell.org/en/2016/11/18/south-caucasus-and-eu-different-paths-each-country [28.10.2017]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  18. Civil.ge (22.08.2018), Two ECHR Applications Lodged against Russia over Tatunashvili Case. Available at: https://civil.ge/archives/249852 [08.12.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  19. Coman Ramona, Crespy Amandine (2014), A critical assessment of the concept of Europeanization in the light of the state of the Union. In: Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review 14(1), 9-29. Available at: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-445987 [05.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  20. Committee of the Regions(2015), Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels, 18.11.2015. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/neighbourhood/pdf/key-documents/151118_joint-communication_review-of-the-enp_en.pdf [22.01.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  21. Cooley Alexander, Mitchell Lincoln A. (2010) Engagement without Recognition: A New Strategy toward Abkhazia and Eurasia's Unrecognised States. In: The Washington Quarterly 33/4, 59-73. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  22. Coppieters Bruno (2018), Four Positions on the Recognition of States in and after the Soviet Union, with Special Reference to Abkhazia. In: Europe-Asia Studies 70/6, S. 991–1014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  23. Coppieters Bruno (2004), The Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict. In: Coppieters et al. (Ed.), Europeanization and Conflict Resolution. Case Studies from the European Periphery, 191-232. Gent: Academia Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  24. Cornell Svante E. (2002), Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective. In: World Politics 54 (January 2002): 245-276. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  25. Council Decision 2011/518/CFSP of 25 August 2011 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 27.08.2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  26. Council Decision 2001/79/CFSP of 22 January 2001 setting up the Military Committee of the European Union. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 30.01.2001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  27. Council Decision 2000/354/CFSP of 22 May 2000 setting up a Committee for civilian aspects of crisis management. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 27.05.2000. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  28. Council Joint Action 2008/760/CFSP of 25 September 2008 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the crisis in Georgia. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 27.09.2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  29. Council Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP of 15 September 2008 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 17.09.2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  30. Council Joint Action 2003/496/CFSP of 7 July 2003 concerning the appointment of an EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 08.07.2003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  31. Council of the European Union (2017a), Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit. Brussels, 24.11.2017. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/31758/final-statement-st14821en17.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  32. Council of the European Union (2017b), Outcome of the Council Meeting. 3551st Council Meeting. Foreign Affairs, Luxembourg, 19 June 2017. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/22366/st10424en17-vf.pdf [06.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  33. Council of the European Union (2008a), ESDP Newsletter No. 6, July 2008. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  34. Council of the European Union (2008b), Presidency conclusions of the Extraordinary European Council held in Brussels (1 September 2008), Available at: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2012594%202008%20INIT [05.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  35. Council of the European Union (2004), Council Joint Action 2004/523/CFSP of 28 June 2004. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  36. Council of the European Union (2003), European Security Strategy “A secure Europe in a better world”, Brussels, 12 December 2003; Available at: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10881-2003-INIT/en/pdf [28.10.2017]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  37. Council of the European Union (1999), Cologne European Council 3-4 June 1999. Conclusions of the Presidency. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/kol1_en.htm [24.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  38. Crawford James R. (2006), The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  39. Cross Mai’a K. Davis (2010), Cooperation by Committee: The EU Military Committee and the Committee for Civilian Crisis Management. In: European Institute for Security Studies, Occasional Paper 82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  40. Delcour Laure (2013), Meandering Europeanisation. EU policy instruments and policy convergence in Georgia under the Eastern Partnership. In: East European Politics 29/3, 344-357. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  41. Devdariani Jaba (2018), Conflicting Realities in Russia and the EU’s Shared Neighbourhood. In: Carnegie Center Moscow, 15.03.2018. Available at: https://carnegie.ru/commentary/75800 [30.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  42. Devdariani Jaba (2017), Georgia: Coping with success. Available at: https://www.opengovpartnership.org/stories/georgia-coping-success [05.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  43. Devdariani Jaba, Giuashvili Teona (2016), Geneva International Disussions – Negotiating the Possible. In: Brill Nijhoff, Security and Human Rights 27, 381-402. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  44. Devlin Matthew (2010), Seizing the Reform Moment: Rebuilding Georgia’s Police, 2004-2006. In: Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University. Available at: https://successfulsocieties.princeton.edu/sites/successfulsocieties/files/Policy_Note_ID126.pdf [25.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  45. De Waal Thomas (2018), Uncertain Ground. Engaging With Europe’s De Facto States and Breakaway Territories. In: Carnegie Europe, 3 December 2018. Available at: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2018/12/03/uncertain-ground-engaging-with-europe-s-de-facto-states-and-breakaway-territories-pub-77823 [08.12.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  46. De Waal Thomas (2017), Enhancing the EU’s Engagement with Separatist Territories. In: Carnegie Europe, 17 January 2017. Available at: http://carnegieeurope.eu/2017/01/17/enhancing-eu-s-engagement-with-separatist-territories-pub-67694 [13.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  47. Dietz Thomas, Stetter Stephan, Albert Mathias (2006), The European Union and Border Conflicts. The Transformative Power of Integration. In: International Organization 60/3, 563-593. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  48. Duff Andrew (2013), The Case for an Associate Membership of the European Union. Available at: https://www.socialeurope.eu/the-case-for-an-associate-membership-of-the-european-union [16.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  49. EC Guidelines on the recognition of new States in Eastern Europe and in the Soviet Union, 16 December 1991. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  50. EEAS (2018a), Statement by the Spokesperson on the latest developments in South Ossetia, Georgia. Brussels, 25.02.2018. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/40348/statement-spokesperson-latest-developments-south-ossetia-georgia_en [10.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  51. EEAS (2018b), Joint press release following the 4th Association Council meeting between the EU and Georgia. Brussels, 06.02.2018. Available at: http://eueuropaeeas.fpfis.slb.ec.europa.eu:8084/delegations/georgia/39401/joint-press-release-following-4th-association-council-meeting-between-eu-and-georgia_en [12.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  52. EEAS (2018c), Statement by the Spokesperson on the “A Step to a Better Future” Peace Initiative by the Georgian Government, 04.04.2018. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/georgia/42446/statement-spokesperson-step-better-future-peace-initiative-georgian-government_en [16.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  53. EEAS (2018d), EU and UNDP kick off media monitoring of 2018 Presidential Elections in Georgia. Press release by the Delegation of the European Union to Georgia. Tbilisi, 18.06.2018. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/georgia/46716/eu-and-undp-kick-media-monitoring-2018-presidential-elections-georgia_en [22.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  54. EEAS (2017a), EU-Georgia relations, factsheet. Brussels, 10.11.2017. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/23634/EU-Georgia%20relations,%20factsheet [05.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  55. EEAS (2017b), Facts and figures about EU-Georgia relations. #eapsummit. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/31659/eap-summit-factsheet-georgia-eng.pdf [10.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  56. EEAS (2017c), Visa-Free Travel comes into effect for Georgia. News stories, Delegation of the European Union to Georgia. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/georgia_en/23697/Visa%20Free%20Travel%20comes%20into%20effect%20for%20Georgia [12.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  57. EEAS (2016a), EU Special Representatives. 14.06.2016. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/3606/EU%20Special%20Representatives [05.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  58. EEAS (2016b), Military and Civilian Missions and Operations, 03.05.2016. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/430/Military%20and%20civilian%20missions%20and%20operations [20.07.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  59. EEAS (2015), Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit (Riga, 21-22 May 2015). Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/eastern/docs/riga-declaration-220515-final_en.pdf [07.02.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  60. EEAS (2014), Myths about the EU-Georgia Association Agreement (AA) and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). Setting the facts straight. Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/georgia/documents/eap_aa/mythbuster_2_2014_en.pdf [11.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  61. EEAS (2006), EU/Georgia Action Plan. November 2006. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/georgia_enp_ap_final_en.pdf [24.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  62. EEAS/European Commission (2014), Programming of the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) 2014-2020. Single Support Framework for EU support to Georgia (2014-2017). Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/pdf/financing-the-enp/georgia_2014_2017_programming_document_en.pdf [13.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  63. EU HR/VP (2018), Remarks by HR/VP at the press conference following the EU-Georgia Association Council. Brussels, 05.02.2018. UNIQUE ID: 180205_8. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/georgia/39329/remarks-hrvp-press-conference-following-eu-georgia-association-council_en [12.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  64. EU HR/VP (2015), The European Union in a changing global environment. A more connected, contested and complex world. Juni 2015. Available at: https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/sites/globalstrategy/files/eugs_review_web.pdf [07.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  65. EUMM (2018), The EU Monitoring Mission on the release of the body of Mr Archil Tatunashvili. Press release 20.03.2018. Available at: https://www.eumm.eu/en/press_and_public_information/press_releases/6241/?year=2018&month=5&print=yes [10.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  66. European Commission (2018), Tackling online disinformation: Commission proposes an EU-wide Code of Practice. Press release. Brussels, 26 April 2018. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3370_en.htm [08.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  67. European Commission / EU HR/VP (2017a), Joint Report to the European Parliament, the Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Report on the Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy Review. Brussels, 18.05.2017. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017JC0018&from=EN [05.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  68. European Commission /EU HR/VP (2017b) Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council. A Strategic Approach to Resilience in the EU’s external action. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/join_2017_21_f1_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en_v7_p1_916039.pdf [08.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  69. European Commission /EU HR/VP (2015), Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. Brussels, 18.11.2015. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/neighbourhood/pdf/key-documents/151118_joint-communication_review-of-the-enp_en.pdf [22.01.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  70. European Commission (2017), Press Release. EU Official Development Assistance reaches highest level ever. Brussels, 01.04.2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  71. European Commission (2015), Resilience in Practice. Saving lives and improving livelihoods. October 2015. Available at: https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/public-fragility/minisite/support-and-guidance/resilience-practice-2015 [08.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  72. European Commission (2011), A new and ambitious European Neighbourhood Policy. Press release 25.05.2011. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-342_en.htm?locale=en [22.01.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  73. European Commission (2010), Commission Staff Working Paper. Accompanying document to the Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Annual Report on the Humanitarian Aid Policy and its Implementation in 2009. COM(2010)138. Brussels, 09.04.2010. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/echo/files/media/publications/annual_report/annex_2009_en.pdf [26.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  74. European Commission (2007), A Strong European Neighbourhood Policy (COM (2007) 774 final, Dec. 5th, 2007), Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  75. European Commission (2006), On Strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (COM (2006) 762 final, Dec. 4th, 2006), Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  76. European Commission (2004), European Neighbourhood Policy. Strategy Paper (COM (2004) 373 final, May 12th, 2004), Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  77. European Commission (2003), Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament – Wider Europe – Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/pdf/pdf/com03_104_en.pdf [31.10.2017]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  78. European Council (2015), European Council Conclusions 19 and 20 March 2015. Available at: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11-2015-INIT/en/pdf [07.02.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  79. European Council (2001), EU Programme for the Prevention of Violent Conflicts, Gothenburg European Council, 15-16 June. Draft Programme (07.06.2001) available at: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%209537%202001%20REV%201 [05.11.2017]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  80. European Parliament (2016), On the EU in a changing global environment—A more connected, contested and complex world. Motion for a resolution. April 2016. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A8-2016-0069&language=EN [06.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  81. Ferrero-Waldner Benita (2009), In: European Commission, Eastern Partnership summit to strengthen EU links with Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus. IP/09/700. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-09-700_en.htm?locale=en [05.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  82. Fischer Sabine (2010a), The Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict. In: Feichtinger Walter, Felberbauer Ernst M., Jurekovic Predrag (Ed.), Failed Prevention – The Case of Georgia. Vienna: National Defence Academy and Bureau for Security Policy, 37-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  83. Fischer Sabine (2010b), The EU’s non-recognition and engagement policy towards Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In: European Union Institute for Security Studies (ISS), Seminar Reports. Brussels, 01.-02.12.2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  84. Gegeshidze Archil (2006), Conflict in Georgia: Religion and Ethnicity. In: KILPADI Pamela (Ed.), Islam and Tolerance in Wider Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute, 62-69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  85. German Tracey C., Bloch Benjamin (2006), Le conflit en Ossétie-du-Sud: la Géorgie contre la Russie. In: Politique étrangère 2006/1 (Spring Issue), p. 51-64. English version available at: https://www.cairn-int.info/article-E_PE_061_0051--the-south-ossetia-conflict-russia.htm [30.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  86. Government of Georgia (n. d.), Public Service Hall. About us. Available at: http://www.psh.gov.ge/main/page/7/405 [05.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  87. Grant Charles (2005), Can variable geometry save EU enlargement? In: Centre for European Reform, 3. October 2005. Available at: http://www.cer.eu/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2005/can-variable-geometry-save-eu-enlargement [16.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  88. Gross Eva, Juncos Ana (2011), Introduction. In: Idem (Ed.), EU Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management. Roles, institutions and policies, 1-14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  89. Hamilton Daniel, Meister Stefan (2016), East and West in a New Era. In: Idem (Ed.), The Eastern Question. Russia, the West and Europe’s Grey Zone, 3-8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  90. Hamilton Daniel, Meister Stefan, Ed. (2016), Eastern Challenges. In: Idem (Ed.), The Eastern Question. Russia, the West and Europe’s Grey Zone, 9-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  91. Hammarberg Thomas, Grono Magdalena (2017), Human Rights in Abkhazia Today. Report, July 2017. Olof Palme International Center. Available at: https://www.palmecenter.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Human-Rights-in-Abkhazia-Today-report-by-Thomas-Hammarberg-and-Magdalena-Grono.pdf [10.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  92. Harzl Benedikt (2016), Der Georgisch-Abchasische Konflikt. Eine rechtliche und politische Analyse. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  93. Harris David John (2004), Cases and materials on international law. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  94. Hauck Volker, Rocca Camilla (2014), Gaps between Comprehensive Approaches of the EU and EU member states. Scoping Study. The Hague: ECDPM/Knowledge Platform Security & Rule of Law. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  95. Hille Charlotte (2010), The Role of the United Nations in Abkhazia, Opportunities and Missed Opportunities between 1992 and 2009. In: Feichtinger Walter, Felberbauer Ernst M., Jurekovic Predrag (Ed.), Failed Prevention – The Case of Georgia. Vienna: National Defence Academy and Bureau for Security Policy, 152-168. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  96. Hilpold Peter (2017), Self-determination and Autonomy: Between Secession and Internal Self-determination. In: International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 24, 302-445. Available at: http://www.peterhilpold.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/IJGR-2017-vol.24_03_302-Self-determ-Auton1822.pdf [11.07.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  97. Human Rights Watch (2009), Up In Flames: Humanitarian Law Violations and Civilian Victims in the Conflict over South Ossetia. Summary and Recommendations. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/georgia0109_brochure_web.pdf [13.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  98. Hume Tim (2012), Nauru and Abkhazia: one is a destitute microstate marooned in the South Pacific, the other a disputed former Soviet Republic 13,000km away, so why are they so keen to be friends? In: The Independent, 14.02.2012. Available at: [https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/nauru-and-abkhazia-one-is-a-destitute-microstate-marooned-in-the-south-pacific-the-other-is-a-6894772.html]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  99. International Conference of American States (1933), The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  100. International Crisis Group (2018), Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Time to Talk Trade. Europe & Central Asia Report No. 249, 24 May 2018. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/caucasus/georgia/249-abkhazia-and-south-ossetia-time-talk-trade [08.12.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  101. International Crisis Group (2006), Conflict Resolution in the South Caucasus: The EU’s Role. Europe Report No. 173, 20 March. Tbilisi/Brussels. Available at: https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/caucasus/conflict-resolution-south-caucasus-eu-s-role [21.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  102. International Crisis Group (2004), Georgia: Avoiding War in South Ossetia. Europe Report No. 159, 26 November. Tbilisi/Brussels. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNTC/UNPAN019224.pdf [05.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  103. Jones Stephen F. (2014), South Ossetia’s unwanted independence. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/od-russia/stephen-f-jones/south-ossetia%E2%80%99s-unwanted-independence [22.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  104. Kammel Arnold (2016), Die neue Globale Strategie der EU – Ein neuer Referenzrahmen für die EU-Außenbeziehungen. AIES: Wien. Available at: https://www.aies.at/download/2016/AIES-Fokus-2016-06.pdf [08.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  105. Khintba Irakliy (2010), Consequences of the Withdrawal of the UN Mission and Prospects for International Presence in AbkhaziJonea. In: International Alert, International Engagement in the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict Resolution Process. May 2010, p. 27-34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  106. Kropatcheva Elena (2012), Russian foreign policy in the realm of European security through the lens of neoclassical realism. In: Journal of Eurasian Studies, 30-40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  107. Kutelia Batu, Gvineria Shota, Ucko David H. (2017), America’s Vital Interests in Georgia: The Case for Engagement. In: War on the Rocks, 14 November 2017. Available at: https://warontherocks.com/2017/11/americas-vital-interests-georgia/ [30.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  108. Kvarchelia Liana (2013), Conflicts and external relations. Abkhazia’s foreign relations. In: International Alert (Caucasus Dialogues), 09.01.2013. Available at: http://www.international-alert.org/blog/conflicts-and-external-relations-english-1 [09.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  109. Lavenex Sandra (2004) EU External Governance in “Wider Europe”. In: Journal of European Public Policy 11/4: 680-700. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  110. Lehne Stefan (2014), Time to reset the European Neighborhood Policy. Carnegie Europe: Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  111. Lenta.ru (2008), Mirnyj plan plocho pereveli na russkij, 07.09.2008. Available at: https://lenta.ru/news/2008/09/07/translate/ [30.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  112. Lomsadze Giorgi (2018), Syria formally recognizes Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In: eurasianet, 29 May 2018. Available at: https://eurasianet.org/syria-formally-recognizes-abkhazia-and-south-ossetia [23.11.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  113. Lynch Dov (2006), Why Georgia matters. Chaillot Paper No. 86. Paris: Institute for Security Studies. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  114. March James G., Olsen Johan P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics. Free Press: New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  115. Martin Mary, Owen Taylor (2010), The second generation of human security: lessons from the UN and EU experience. In: International Affairs 86: 211-224. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  116. Menabde Giori (2018), Abkhazia and South Ossetia Reject Georgia’s Peace Plan. In: Eurasia Daily Monitor 15/59. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/abkhazia-and-south-ossetia-reject-georgias-peace-plan/ [16.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  117. Meuser Michael, Nagel Ulrike (1991), ExpertInneninterviews – vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. In: Garz Detlef, Kraimer Klaus (Ed.): Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung: Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen. Opladen: Westdt. Verlag, 441-471. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  118. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Abkhazia (2017), The 41st round of the Geneva International Discussions was held on October 10-11, 2017. Available at: http://mfaapsny.org/en/allnews/news/geneva-discussions/kommentariy-mid-abkhazii+675/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  119. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia (2017), Donald Trump has signed into law the Act recognizing the occupation of the territories of Georgia. News, 06.05.2017. Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.ge/News/donald-trampma-kheli-moacera-biujetis-kanons,-rome.aspx?lang=en-US [30.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  120. Morar Filipo (2010), The Myth of “Frozen Conflicts”. Transcending Illusive Dilemmas. In: per Concordiam. Journal of European Security and Defense Issues. Domestic Security 1/2, June 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  121. NATO (2008), Bucharest Summit Declaration. Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008. Press Release (2008) 049. Available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ua/natohq/official_texts_8443.htm [12.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  122. OC Media (2018), Georgia unveils “unprecedented” peace initiative for Abkhazia, South Ossetia. 04.04.2018. Available at: http://oc-media.org/georgia-unveils-unprecedented-peace-initiative-for-abkhazia-south-ossetia/ [16.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  123. Olof Palme International Center (2017), The Olof Palme International Center publishes the first independent report on human rights in Abkhazia. 31 July 2017. Available at: https://www.palmecenter.se/en/article/palmecenter-publishes-first-independent-report-human-rights-abkhazia/ [10.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  124. Oproiu Monica (2015), Crafting a Wider Strategy for Conflict Management in the Neighbourhood? A Comparative Perspective on the European Union’s Civilian Missions in Georgia and Kosovo. In: Romanian Journal of European Affairs Vol. 15/2, 22-41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  125. OSCE (n. d.), OSCE Mission to Georgia (closed). Mandate. Available at: https://www.osce.org/georgia-closed/43386 [11.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  126. OSCE/ODIHR (2004), Georgia. Extraordinary Presidential Election 04 January 2004. OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Report. Available at: https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/georgia/24600?download=true [16.03.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  127. Regulation (EU) No 232/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 establishing a European Neighbourhood Instrument. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 15.03.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  128. Regulation (EU) No 230/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 establishing an instrument contributing to stability and peace. In: Official Journal or the European Union, 15.03.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  129. Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 09.11.2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  130. Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an instrument establishing an Instrument for Stability. In: Official Journal or the European Union, 24.11.2014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  131. Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 - the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC. In: Official Journal of the European Union, 20.12.2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  132. Rukhadze Vasili (2018), Georgia’s Much Celebrated Visa Liberalization With European Union Comes Under Threat. In: Eurasia Daily Monitor 15/36. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/georgias-much-celebrated-visa-liberalization-european-union-comes-threat/ [12.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  133. Sasse Gwendolyn (2008), The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU’s Eastern Neighbours. In: Europe-Asia Studies 60/2: 295-316. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  134. Schimmelfennig Frank (2015), Europeanization beyond Europe. In: Living Reviews in European Governance Vol. 10/1. Available at: http://www.europeangovernance-livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2015-1/download/lreg-2015-1.pdf [20.07.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  135. Schimmelfennig Frank, Lavenex Sandra (2009), EU Rules beyond EU Borders. Theorizing external governance in European Politics. In: Journal of European Public Policy 16/6, 791-812. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  136. Schimmelfennig Frank, Sedelmeier Ulrich (2005), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  137. Schimmelfennig Frank, Sedelmeier Ulrich (2004), Governance by Conditionality. EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. In: Journal of European Public Policy 11/4: 661-679. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  138. Solana Javier (2008), Address by Javier Solana, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, at the European Union Monitoring Mission (EUMM) Headquarters in Georgia. Council of the European Union, Tbilisi, 30 September 2008. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/dv/sede081208solanaspeecheummgeorgia_/SEDE081208SolanaspeechEUMMGeorgia_en.pdf [26.04.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  139. Stewart Emma J. (2011), European Union Conflict prevention and the European security architecture. In: Gross Eva, Juncos Ana, Ed., EU Conflict Prevention and Crisis Management. Roles, institutions and policies, 32-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  140. Stone Jon (2018), Russian disinformation campaign has been ‘extremely successful’ in Europe, warns EU. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/russian-fakenews-disinformation-europe-putin-trump-eu-european-parliament-commission-a8164526.html [08.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  141. Tagliavini Heidi (2009), Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (IIFFMCG). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  142. Techau Jan (2016), The EU’s New Global Strategy: Useful or Pointless? In: Carnegie Europe, 01.06.2016. Available at: http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=63994 [05.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  143. Tocci Natalie (2017), From the European Security Strategy to the EU Global Strategy: explaining the journey. In: International Politics 54/4, 487-502. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  144. United Nations (n. d.) About UN Membership. Available at: http://www.un.org/en/sections/member-states/about-un-membership/index.html [10.05.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  145. U.S. Department of State (2009), United States-Georgia Charter on Strategic Partnership. Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, 09 January 2009. Available at: https://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/or/121029.htm [30.06.2018]. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  146. Van Herpen Marcel H. (2016), Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy. New York/London: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  147. Vidmar Jure (2013), Democratic Statehood in International Law. The Emergence of New States in Post-Cold War Practice. Oxford/Portland: Hart. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  148. Vogl Doris (2010), Missed Windows of Opportunity in the Georgian-South Ossetian Conflict. The Political Agenda of the Post-Revolutionary Saakashvili Government (2004-2006). In: Feichtinger Walter, Felberbauer Ernst M., Jurekovic Predrag (Ed.), Failed Prevention – The Case of Georgia. Vienna: National Defence Academy and Bureau for Security Policy, 59-78. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  149. Wagner Wolfgang, Anholt Roseanne (2016), Resilience as the EU Global Strategy’s new leitmotif: pragmatic, problematic or promising? In: Contemporary Security Policy 37, 414-430. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  150. Werther-Pietsch Ursula et al. (2017), Between Fragility and Resistence. In: Werther-Pietsch Ursula (Ed.), Global Peace and Security. International Crisis and Conflict Management – with 90 key lessons. Studienbuch. Wien: Manz, 37-82. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  151. Wolff Stefan (2011), The limits of international conflict management in the case of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. In: Caspersen Nina, Stansfield Gareth, Ed., Unrecognised States in the International System. Routledge: Oxon, 147-164. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363
  152. Zürcher Christoph (2005), Georgia’s time of troubles, 1989-1993. In: Coppieters Bruno, Legvold Robert (Ed.), Statehood and Security: Georgia After the Rose Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 83-115. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783828872363

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Wissenschaftl.Beitr.a.d.Tectum Verlag: Politikwissenschaft"
Cover des Buchs: Türkiye und Österreich im 21. Jahrhundert
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Mehmet Soytürk
Türkiye und Österreich im 21. Jahrhundert
Cover des Buchs: Stadtentwicklungspolitik in Kleinstädten
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Wolfgang Grubwinkler
Stadtentwicklungspolitik in Kleinstädten
Cover des Buchs: EU’s Digital Diplomacy
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Stefan Nisch
EU’s Digital Diplomacy
Cover des Buchs: Die Kalifats-Utopie des IS und ihre religiöse Rechtfertigung
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Johannes Hummel
Die Kalifats-Utopie des IS und ihre religiöse Rechtfertigung
Cover des Buchs: The European Union as a Normative Power?
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Jana Stehlíková
The European Union as a Normative Power?

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex