Cover des Buchs: Moral Normativity in an Interdisciplinary Perspective
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Sammelband Kein Zugriff

Moral Normativity in an Interdisciplinary Perspective

Humans, Animals & Artificial Intelligence
Herausgeber:innen:
Reihe:
Ethics, Law and AI, Band 1
Verlag:
 2023

Zusammenfassung

Heutzutage widmen viele Disziplinen dem normativen Charakter unserer Lebensformen aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven besondere Aufmerksamkeit. Von der Linguistik bis zur Rechtswissenschaft, von der Anthropologie bis zur Philosophie, von der Ökonomie bis zu den Neurowissenschaften bildet das Thema der moralischen Normativität einen gordischen Knoten der Gegenwart, auf den sich die Bemühungen der wissenschaftlichen und philosophischen Verständigung richten.Der folgende Band ist auf ein besseres Verständnis der moralischen Normativität ausgerichtet. Er versammelt Arbeiten von Primatologen, Soziologen und Rechtsphilosophen, Ethikern und Phänomenologen und deren Beiträge zur Lösung der Fragen nach dem normativen Profil ethischer Begriffe, Urteile und Gründe, d.h. nach der Quelle ihrer Bindungskraft, die das Verhalten des menschlichen Akteurs leitet. Mit Beiträgen vonJohn J. Drummond | Federico L.G. Faroldi | Edoardo Fittipaldi | Roberto Redaelli | Alessio Rotundo | Richard Wrangham.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-495-99428-3
ISBN-Online
978-3-495-99429-0
Verlag
Karl Alber, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Ethics, Law and AI
Band
1
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
141
Produkttyp
Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 6
  2. Moral Normativity in Humans, Animals & Artificial Intelligence. An Introduction Kein Zugriff 7 - 10
    Autor:innen:
  3. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Repression of competition: a critical condition for the evolution of cooperation. Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Reduction of competition among males in humans Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Self-domestication: evidence for the execution of alpha males in the Pleistocene. Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Implication of communally approved execution for the evolution of morality. Kein Zugriff
    5. 5. Intergroup competition: the traditional hypothesis Kein Zugriff
    6. 6. Sex differences in the origin and dynamics of the moral system Kein Zugriff
    7. 7. Morality and groupishness Kein Zugriff
    8. 8. Conclusion: the transition from Might to Right and the emergence of Homo duplex Kein Zugriff
  4. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. A conceptualization for »norm« and »normative behavior«, and its theorical premises Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.1.1.1. Anger Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.1.1.2 Indignation Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.1.1.3 Disgust Kein Zugriff
          1. 3.2.1.1 Guilt Kein Zugriff
          2. 3.2.1.2 Shame Kein Zugriff
          3. 3.2.1.3 Pride Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
  5. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. Epistemic norms Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Practical norms Kein Zugriff
  6. Autor:innen:
    1. Part One. Raymond Aron and the Ethnologist’s Judgment Kein Zugriff
    2. Part Two. Merleau-Ponty and Social Anthropology Kein Zugriff
  7. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Normativity: from humans to artificiaI intelligence Kein Zugriff
    2. 2. The normative question: some preliminary remarks Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Digital normativity & artificial intelligence Kein Zugriff
    4. 4. Artificial intelligence from a postphenomenological perspective and the notion of quasi-normativity. Some indications for a solution to the normative question in the field of AI ethics Kein Zugriff
    5. 5. Brief conclusions: the hybrid origin of normativity and AI Kein Zugriff
  8. Autor:innen:
    1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.1 AGI, Alignment, Reinforcement Learning Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.2 The Human Compatible Approach Kein Zugriff
    3. 3. Problems with the human compatible framework. Kein Zugriff
        1. Case 1: Paperclip Scenario Kein Zugriff
        2. Case 2: Self-driving cars and the trolley problem Kein Zugriff
      2. 4.2. Methodological Remarks Kein Zugriff
    5. 5 Conclusion and Further Work Kein Zugriff
  9. Abstracts Kein Zugriff 135 - 138
  10. List of Contributors Kein Zugriff 139 - 141

Literaturverzeichnis (199)

  1. Ågren, J. A., Davies, N. G., & Foster, K. R. (2019). Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation. Nature, Ecology and Evolution, 3(7), 1018–1029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0907-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  2. Alexander, R. D. (1971). The search for an evolutionary philosophy of man. Proc Roy Soc Victoria, 84, 99–120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  3. Alexander, R. D. (1979). Darwinism and Human Affairs. University of Washington Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  4. Alexander, R. D. (1982). Biology and the moral paradoxes. J.Social. Biol. Struct., 5, 389–395. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  5. Alexander, R. D. (1987). The Biology of Moral Systems. Aldine de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  6. Alexander, R. D. (1990). How did humans evolve? Reflections on the uniquely unique species. The University of Michigan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  7. Andirkó, A., Moriano, J., Vitriolo, A., Kuhlwilm, M., Testa, G., & Boeckx, C. (2021). Fine-grained temporal mapping of derived high-frequency variants supports the mosaic nature of the evolution of Homo sapiens. bioRxiv 2021.01.22.427608. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.22.427608 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  8. Bauer, M., Blattman, C., Chytilová, J., Henrich, J., Miguel, E., & Mitts, T. (2016). Can war foster cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30, 249–274. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.249 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  9. Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: the evolution of egalitarian behavior. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  10. Boehm, C. (2008). Purposive social selection and the evolution of human altruism. Cross-Cultural Research, 42(4), 319–352. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  11. Boehm, C. (2012). Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism, and Shame. Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  12. Boehm, C. (2018). Collective intentionality: A basic and early component of moral evolution. Philosophical Psychology, 31(5), 680–702. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2018.1486607 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  13. Brooks, J., Onishi, E., Clark, I. R., Bohn, M., & Yamamoto, S. (2021). Uniting against a common enemy: Perceived outgroup threat elicits ingroup cohesion in chimpanzees. PLoS ONE, 16(e0246869), 1–17. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0246869 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  14. Burkart, J. M., Brügger, R. K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2018). Evolutionary origins of morality: insights from non-human primates. Frontiers in Sociology, 3(17), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2018.00017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  15. Choi, J.-K., & Bowles, S. (2007). The coevolution of parochial altruism and war. Science, 318, 636–640. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  16. Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture–gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15 (5), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  17. Cieri, R. L., Churchill, S. E., Franciscus, R. G., Tan, J., & Hare, B. (2014). Craniofacial feminization, social tolerance, and the origins of behavioral modernity. Current Anthropology, 55, 419–443. https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/677209 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  18. Curry, O. S., Chesters, M. J., & Van Lissa, C. J. (2019b). Mapping morality with a compass: Testing the theory of ›morality-as-cooperation‹ with a new questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 78, 106–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2018.10.008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  19. Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019a). Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-as-Cooperation in 60 Societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  20. de Waal, F. B. M. (2006). Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  21. Durkheim, É. (1973 (1914)). The dualism of human nature and its social conditions. In R. N. Bellah (Ed.), Emile Durkheim on Morality and Society: Selected Writings (pp. 149–163). University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  22. Durkheim, É. (1995 (1912)). The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  23. Dyble, M. (2021). The evolution of altruism through war is highly sensitive to population structure and to civilian and fighter mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(e2011142118), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011142118 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  24. Engelmann, J. M., Clift, J. B., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2017). Social disappointment explains chimpanzees’ behaviour in the inequity aversion task. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 20171502. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1502 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  25. Engelmann, J. M., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2016). The effects of being watched on resource acquisition in chimpanzees and human children. Animal Cognition, 19(1), 147–151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  26. Flinn, M. V., Geary, D. C., & Ward, C. V. (2005). Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 10–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  27. Frank, S. A. (2003). Perspective: repression of competition and the evolution of cooperation. Evolution, 57(4), 693–705. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  28. Frank, S. A. (2013). A new theory of cooperation. In K. Summers & B. Crespi (Eds.), Human Social Evolution. The Foundational Works of Richard D. Alexander (pp. 40–47). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  29. Freud, S. (1989 (1930)). Civilization and Its Discontents (J. Strachey, Ed.). W. W. Norton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  30. Glowacki, L., Wilson, M. L., & Wrangham, R. (2020). The evolutionary anthropology of war. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 178, 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.09.014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  31. Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  32. Greene, J. D., & Young, L. (2020). The cognitive neuroscience of moral judgment and decision-making. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences (Vol. 6). MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  33. Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. Pantheon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  34. Henrich, J., & Muthukrishna, M. (2021). The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 207–240. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  35. Hublin, J.-J., Ben-Ncer, A., Bailey, S. E., Freidline, S. E., Neubauer, S., Skinner, M. M., Bergmann, I., Le Cabec, A., Benazzi, S., Harvati, K., & Gunz, P. (2017). New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens. Nature, 546, 289–292. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  36. Hudson, V. M., Bowen, D. L., & Nielsen, P. L. (2020). The First Political Order: How Sex Shapes Governance and National Security Worldwide. Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  37. Kluver, J., Frazier, R., & Haidt, J. (2014). Behavioral ethics for Homo economicus, Homo heuristicus, and Homo duplex. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123, 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.12.004 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  38. Kundu, P., & Cummins, D. D. (2013). Morality and conformity: The Asch paradigm applied to moral decisions. Social Influence, 8(4), 268–279, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.727767 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  39. Leach, H. (2003). Human domestication reconsidered. Current Anthropology, 44(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/368119 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  40. McAuliffe, K., & Santos, L. R. (2018). Do animals have a sense of fairness? In K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of Moral Psychology (pp. 393–400). Guilford Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  41. Páez, D., Rimé, B., Basabe, N., & Wlodarczyk, A. (2015). Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  42. Paley, C. (2021). Beyond Bad: How Obsolete Morals Are Holding Us Back. Hodder & Stoughton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  43. Palombit, R. A. (2014). Sexual conflict in nonhuman primates. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 46, 191–280. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  44. Radford, A. N., Majolo, B., & Aureli, F. (2016). Within-group behavioural consequences of between-group conflict: a prospective review. Proc R Soc B, 283(20161567),1–10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1567 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  45. Rosaldo, M. Z. (1974). Women, culture and society: a theoretical overview. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, Culture and Society (pp. 17–42). Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  46. Samuni, L., Mielke, A., Preis, A., Crockford, C., & Wittig, R. M. (2020). Intergroup Competition Enhances Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) In-group Cohesion. International Journal of Primatology, 41, 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-019-00112-y Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  47. Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (1998). Durkheim, morality and modernity: collective effervescence, homo duplex and the sources of moral action. British Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/591309 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  48. Smuts, B. B. (1992). Male aggression against women: an evolutionary perspective. Human Nature, 3, 1–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  49. Smuts, B. B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 6, 1–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  50. Spikins, P., French, J. C., John-Wood, S., & Dytham, C. (2021). Theoretical and methodological approaches to ecological changes, social behaviour and human intergroup tolerance 300,000 to 30,000 BP. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 28(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09503-5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  51. Sripada, C. S., & Stich, S. (2006). A framework for the psychology of norms. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), Evolution and Cognition. The Innate Mind, Vol. 2. Culture and Cognition (pp. 280–301). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  52. Summers, K., Crespi, B. J., & Flinn, M. V. (2020). Were Humans Their Own Most Important Selective Pressure for Cooperation and Morality? A Critical Review of Richard Wrangham’s The Goodness Paradox. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000203 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  53. Theofanopoulou, C., Gastaldon, S., O’Rourke, T., Samuels, B. D., Martins, P. T., Delogu, F., Alamri, S., & Boeckx, C. (2017). Self-domestication in Homo sapiens: Insights from comparative genomics. PLoS ONE, 12(10), e0185306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185306 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  54. Tomasello, M. (2016). A Natural History of Human Morality. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  55. Turchin, P., Currie, T. E., Turner, E. A. L., & Gavrilets, S. (2013). War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41), 16384–16389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308825110 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  56. West, S. A., Cooper, G. A., Ghoul, M. B., & Griffin, A. S. (2021). Ten recent insights for our understanding of cooperation. Nature, Ecology and Evolution, 5(4), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01384-x Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  57. Wrangham, R. W. (2018). Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713611115 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  58. Wrangham, R. W. (2019a). The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship Between Virtue and Violence in Human Evolution. Alfred A. Knopf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  59. Wrangham, R. (2019b). Hypotheses for the evolution of reduced reactive aggression in the context of human self-domestication. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1914), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01914 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  60. Wrangham, R. W. (2021). Targeted conspiratorial killing, human self-domestication and the evolution of groupishness. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 3(e26), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2021.20 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  61. Zanella, M., Vitriolo, A., Andirko, A., Martins, P. T., Sturm, S., O’Rourke, T., Laugsch, M., Malerba, N., Skaros, A., Trattaro, S., Germain, P.-L., Mihailovic, M., Merla, G., Rada-Iglesias, A., Boeckx, C., & Testa, G. (2019). Dosage analysis of the 7q11.23 Williams region 1 identifies BAZ1B as a major human gene patterning the modern human face and underlying self-domestication. Science Advances, 5(eaaw7908). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw7908 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-11
  62. Angyal, Andras, 1941. Disgust and related aversions. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36: 393–412. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  63. Bovet, Pierre, 1917. Le respect: essai de psychologie morale. Revue de Théologie et de Philosophie, 5, 2: 204–222. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  64. Bovet, Pierre, 1925/1928. Le sentiment religieux et la psychologie de l’enfant. English translation The Child’s Religion. London & Toronto (ON): Dent & Sons. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  65. De Waal, Frans, 1996. Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge (MA) & London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  66. DSM-5, 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Publishing: Washington (DC) & London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  67. Ferenczi, Sándor 1925. Psychoanalysis of sexual habits. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 6: 372–404. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  68. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2016a. Introduction: Continental Legal Realism. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World. Tome 2: Main Orientations and Topics. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  69. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2016b. Leon Petrażycki’s Theory of Law. In Enrico Pattaro & Corrado Roversi (eds.), Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World, Tome 2: Main Orientations and Topics. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  70. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2021a. Reducing Norms to Superegoic Emotions. Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, 23, 2021, 2: 283–307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  71. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2021b. On Searle’s Derivation and Its Relation to Constitutive Rules: A Social Scientist’s Perspective. In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi, Revisiting Searle on Deriving »Ought« from »Is«. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  72. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2022a. Norma. Una concettualizzazione per la sociologia del diritto e le altre scienze sociali. Milan: LED. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  73. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2022b. From Norms to Normative Behaviors. L’Ircocervo, 21, 2: 233–249. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  74. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2023. Petrażycki’s Puzzle of Jural Emotions: Bridging the Psychological Theory of Law with Modern Social and Psychological Sciences. In Edoardo Fittipaldi & A. Javier Treviño (eds.), Leon Petrażycki: Law, Emotions, Society. Routledge: New York & London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  75. Freud, Sigmund, 1929/1981. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. English translation Civilization and Its Discontents in Sigmund Freud (James Strachey ed.), The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and Its Discontents and Other Works. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psychoanalysis. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  76. Freud, Sigmund, 1932/1981. Neue Folge der Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. English translation New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Amnalysis in Sigmund Freud (James Strachey ed.), New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis and Other Works. London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psychoanalysis. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  77. Gibbs, Jack P. 1968. Norms. II. The Study of Norms. In David L. Sills & Robert K. Merton (eds.), The International Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences, vol. 11, London & New York: The Macmillan Co. & The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  78. Goodall, Jane, 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge (MA) & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  79. Haidt, Jonathan, 2002. The Moral Emotions. In Klaus Scherer, Richard Davidson, & H. Hill Goldsmith, Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  80. Herz, Rachel, 2012/13. That’s Disgusting: Unraveling the Mysteries of Repulsion. New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  81. Kurczewski, Jacek, 1976. Ambiguous Reciprocity. The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 2: 5–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  82. Lewis, Helen B. 1971. Shame and Guilt in Neurosis. New York: International Universities Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  83. Lewis, Michael, 1992. Shame. The Exposed Self. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  84. Müller-Braunschweig, Carl, 1922. Psychoanalytische Gesichtspunkte zur Psychogenese der Moral, insbesondere des moralischen Aktes. Imago, 7: 237–250. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  85. Pattaro, Enrico, 2005. The Law and the Right: A Reappraisal of the Reality that Ought to Be. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  86. Petrażycki, Leon, 1908/1933. Vvedenie v izučenie prava i nravstvennosti. Osnovy èmocional’noj psihologii. Abridged translation of the 3rd ed. Methodologie des Rechts und der Moral. Zugleich eine neue allgemeine logische Lehre von der Bildung der allgemeinen Begriffe und Theorien. Paris: Sirey. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  87. Petrażycki, Leon 1909–1910. Teorija prava i gosudarstva v sviazi s teoriej nravstvennosti. Saint Petersburg: Ekateringofskoe Pečatnoe Delo. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  88. Piaget, Jean, 1932/1948. Le jugement moral chez l’enfant. English translation The Moral Judgement of the Child. Glencoe (IL): The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  89. Pinker, Steven, 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  90. Rozin, Paul, & April E. Fanlon, 1987. A Perspective on Disgust. 94, 1: 23–41. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  91. Rycroft, Charles, 1968/1995. A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. 2nd ed. London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  92. Sandler, Joseph, 1960. On the Concept of SuperEgo. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 15 (3): 128–162. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  93. Sherman, Gary D., Jonathan Haidt, & James A. Coan, n.d. The Psychophysiology of Moral Disgust: Throat Tightness and Heart Rate Deceleration. Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  94. Tangney, June P., & Ronda L. Dearing, 2002. Shame and Guilt. London: The Guildford Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  95. Tomasello, Michael, 2019. Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny. London & Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  96. Widen, Sherri C., & James A. Russell, 2010. The »Disgust Face« Conveys Anger to Children. Emotion, 10(4): 455–466. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  97. Wrangham, Richard, 2017/2018. Two types of aggression in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, available at https://www.pnas.org/content/115/2/245 (accessed May 28th, 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  98. Wrangham, Richard, 2019. The Goodness Paradox: The Strange Relationship between Virtue and Violence. New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-31
  99. Bicchieri, Cristina, Ryan Muldoon, and Alessandro Sontuoso. 2018. Social Norms. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/social-norms/. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  100. Crane, Tim. 2001. Intentional Objects. Ratio 14 (4): 336–49. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  101. Drummond, John J. 1979. On Seeing a Material Thing in Space: The Role of Kinaesthesis in Visual Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (1): 19–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  102. Drummond, John J. 2010. Self-Responsibility and Eudaimonia. In Philosophy Phenomenology Sciences, edited by Carlo Ierna, Hanne Jacobs, and Filip Mattens, 441–60. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  103. Drummond, John J. 2012. Intentionality without Representationalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, edited by Dan Zahavi, 115–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  104. Drummond, John J. 2013. Phenomenology, Eudaimonia, and the Virtues. In Phenomenology and Virtue Ethics, ed by Kevin Hermberg and Paul Gyllenhammer, 97–112. New York: Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  105. Drummond, John J. 2017. Having the Right Attitudes. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 15: 142–63. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  106. Drummond, John J. 2022 Sympathetic Respect, Respectful Sympathy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25 (1): 123–137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  107. Husserl, Edmund. 1969. Formal and Transcendental Logic. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  108. Husserl, Edmund. 1970a. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology. Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  109. Husserl, Edmund. 1970b. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated by David Carr. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  110. Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. Edited by Ludwig Landgrebe. Translated by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  111. Husserl, Edmund. 1989a. Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922–1937). Edited by Thomas Nenon and Hans Rainer Sepp. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  112. Husserl, Edmund. 1989b. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  113. Husserl, Edmund. 1997. Thing and Space: Lectures of 1907. Translated by Richard Rojcewicz. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  114. Husserl, Edmund. 2001a. Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic. Translated by Anthony Steinbock. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  115. Husserl, Edmund. 2001b. Logical Investigations. Edited by Dermot Moran. Translated by J. N. Findlay. Vol. 2. 2 vols. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  116. Husserl, Edmund. 2014. Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  117. Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  118. Stueber, Karsten R. 2005. How to Think about Rules and Rule Following. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3): 307–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  119. Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-67
  120. Aron, Raymond. 1948 [1938]. Introduction à la philosophie de l’histoire. Gallimard, Paris. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  121. Aron, Raymond. 1964. »The Rationality of Modern Society«, in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Vol. XX, N° 1. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  122. Aron, Raymond. 1970. »Le Paradoxe du même et de l’autre«, in Échanges et communications, ed. J. Pouillon and P. Maranda, Studies in Genetal Anthropology, V. Vol. II. The Hague, Mouton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  123. Aron, Raymond. 2011 [1946]. »La Philosophie de l’histoire«, in Dimensions de la conscience historique. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  124. Aron, Raymond. 2011 [1957]. »La notion du sens de l’histoire«, in Dimensions de la conscience historique. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  125. Aron, Raymond. 2011 [1959]. »De l’objet de l’histoire«, in Dimensions de la conscience historique. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  126. Aron, Raymond. 2011 [1960]. »L’aube de l’histoire universelle«, in Dimensions de la conscience historique. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  127. Bimbenet, Etienne. 2004. Nature et Humanité. Merleau-Ponty – le problèbe anthropologique. Paris, Vrin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  128. Broekman, Jan M. 1971, Strukturalismus. Freiburg / München, Verlag Karl Alber. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  129. Bruzina, Ronald. 1981. »Dependence on Language and Autonomy of Reason«, in Man and World, 14. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  130. Bruzina, Ronald. 2001. »Construction in Phenomenology«, in The Reach of Reflection: Issues for Phenomenology’s Second Century. Steven Crowell, Lester Embress, Samuel J. Julian (eds.). Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  131. Goldman, Marcio. 2004. »Lévi-Strauss et les sens de l’histoire«, in Les temps modernes, Vol. 628. Issue 3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  132. Jacquet-Francillon, François. 2017. »Questions à l’anti-humanisme de Claude Lévi-Strauss«, in Le Télémaque, 2, N° 52. Presses universitaires de Caen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  133. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963 [1949]. »History and Anthropology«, in Structural Anthropology. Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  134. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983 [1952]. »Race and History«, in Structural Anthropology. Volume 2. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  135. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983 [1956]. »The Three Humanisms«, Structural Anthropology. Volume 2. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  136. Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 2021 [1962]. Wild Thought. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  137. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964 [1947]. »The Metaphysical in Man«, in Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  138. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964 [1962]. »An Unpublished Text by Maurice Merleau-Ponty: A Prospectus of His Work«, in The Primacy of Perception. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  139. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964 [1959]. »Form Mauss to Claude Lévi-Strauss«, in Signs. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  140. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968 [1964]. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  141. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1970 [1968]. Themes from the Lectures. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  142. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1973 [1955]. The Adventures of Dialectic. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  143. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2010 [2003]. Institution and Passivity: Course Notes from the Collège de France (1954–1955). Evanston, IL, Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  144. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012 [1945]. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, London and New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  145. Terzi, Roberto. 2017. »Institution, événement et histoire chez Merleau-Ponty«, in Bulletin Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  146. d’analyse phénoménologique, XIII, 3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-83
  147. Bagnoli, C. (2017). Constructivism in metaethics. In: Zalta, E. N. (Ed), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 edn). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  148. Brennan, T., Dieterich, W., Ehret, B (2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the COMPAS risk and needs assessment system. Crim Justice Behav 36, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808326545 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  149. Cristianini, N. (2023). The shortcut: why intelligent machines do not think like us. Boca Raton/London/New York: CRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  150. Crowell, S. (2013). Normativity and phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  151. Crowell, S. (2015). Second-person phenomenology. In: Szanto, T., Moran, D. (Eds), Phenomenology of sociality. Discovering the ›we‹, 70–89. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  152. Crowell, S. (2019). Second-person reasons: Darwall, Levinas, and the phenomenology of reason. In: Fagenblat, M., Erdur, M. (Eds.), Levinas and analytic philosophy: second-person normativity and the moral life, 4–28. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  153. Darwall, S. (2006). The second-person standpoint: morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  154. Fittipaldi, E. (2012). Everyday legal ontology. Milano: LED. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  155. Fourneret, E., Yvert, B. (2020). Digital Normativity: a challenge for human subjectivation. Front Artif Intell 3:27. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00027 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  156. Funke, A., Redaelli, R. (2021). Rethinking the sources of normativity in ethics. Ethics & Politics 2: 257–260. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  157. He, F., Wang, Y., Xiu, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, L. (2021). Artificial intelligence in prenatal ultrasound diagnosis. Front Med 8:729978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.729978 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  158. Heinämaa, S., Hartimo, M., Hirvonen, I. (2022). Contemporary phenomenologies of normativity: norms, goals, and values. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  159. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: from garden to earth. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  160. Johnson, D. G. (2006). Computer systems: moral entities but not moral agents. Ethics Inf Technol 8: 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-006-9111-5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  161. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The sources of normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  162. Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-constitution: agency, identity, and integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  163. Krijnen, C. (2019). Concepts of normativity: Kant or Hegel? Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  164. LeBar, M. (2008). Aristotelian constructivism. Soc Philos Policy 25: 182–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052508080072 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  165. Loidolt, S. (2019). Experience and normativity: the phenomenological approach. In: Cimino, A., Leijenhorst, C. (Eds), Phenomenology and experience: new perspectives. Leiden and Boston: Brill. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  166. Margalit, A., Raz, J. (1990). National self-determination. J Philos 87: 439–461. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026968 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  167. Okrent, M. (1999). Heidegger and Korsgaard on human reflection. Philos Top, 27: 47–76. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19992724 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  168. Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian constructivism in moral theory. J Philos, 77: 515–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025790 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  169. Redaelli, R. (2021). A relational account of moral normativity: the Neo-Kantian notion of we-subject. J Transcend Philos 2: 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2021-0014. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  170. Redaelli, R. (2023). From tool to mediator. A postphenomenological approach to artificial intelligence. In: Possati, L. (Ed), Humanizing Artificial Intelligence: Psychoanalysis and the Problem of Control. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  171. Rosenberger, R., Verbeek P.-P. (2015). A Field Guide to Postphenomenology. In: Rosenberger, R., Verbeek, P.-P. (Eds.), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations, 9–41. London: Lexington Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  172. Schloßberger, M. (2019). Phänomenologie der Normativität. Entwurf einer materialen Anthropologie im Anschluss an Max Scheler und Helmuth Plessner. Basel: Schwabe. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  173. Smith, W. H. (2012). The phenomenology of moral normativity. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  174. Staiti, A. (2015). Praktische Identität aus phänomenologischer Sicht: Korsgaard und Husserl. Phänomenol Forsch 1: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.28937/1000107764 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  175. Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  176. Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  177. Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: a theory of ontogeny. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  178. Verbeek, P.-P. (2008a). Cyborg intentionality: rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 7: 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  179. Verbeek, P.-P. (2008b). Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: a postphenomenological analysis. Hum Stud 31: 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9079-0 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  180. Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  181. Wallach, W., Allen, C. (2009). Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  182. Wedgwood, R. (2007). The nature of normativity. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  183. Wrangham, R. (2019). The goodness paradox: the strange relationship between virtue and violence in human evolution. New York: Pantheon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-105
  184. Awad, Edmond, Sohan Dsouza, Azim Shariff, Iyad Rahwan, and Jean-François Bonnefon. 2020. Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 5, pp. 2332–2337. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  185. Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  186. Faroldi, Federico L. G. 2019. Hyperintensionality and Normativity. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  187. Faroldi, Federico L. G. 2021. Towards a Logic of Value and Disagreement via Imprecise Measures. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, 50, 2, pp. 131–149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  188. Faroldi, Federico L. G. Reasons-based AI Ethics, ms., 2023. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  189. Fine, Kit. 2012. Counterfactuals without Possible Worlds. Journal of Philosophy, 109, 3, pp. 221–246. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  190. Fine, Kit. 2017. Truthmaker Semantics. In: A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, ed. by Bob Hale, Crispin Wright, and Alexander Miller, 2nd ed., ms, Blackwell, London, pp. 556–77. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  191. Gabriel, Iason. 2020. Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment. Minds and Machine. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  192. Ng, A. Y. and Stuart Russell. 2000. Algorithms for inverse reinforcement learning. In: Proc. 17th Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML-2000), ed. by P. Langley, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 663–670. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  193. Ngo, Richard. 2020 AI Safety from First Principles, ms. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  194. Pearl, Judea. 2000. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  195. Pettigrew, Richard. 2019. Choosing for Changing Selves. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  196. Russell, Stuart. 2019. Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  197. Talbert, Matthew. 2019. Moral Responsibility. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta, Winter 2019, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  198. MacAskill, William, Krister Bykvist and Toby Ord. 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123
  199. Moral Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783495994290-123

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Ethics, Law and AI"
Cover des Buchs: Grundlegung zu einer synthetischen Ontologie der Maschinen
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Hendrik Poschmann
Grundlegung zu einer synthetischen Ontologie der Maschinen
Cover des Buchs: Unfallalgorithmen
Monographie Vollzugriff
Vanessa Schäffner
Unfallalgorithmen

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex