Mapping Environmental Risk and Energy Communication
Ecoculture in Energy Risk- Autor:innen:
- Verlag:
- 2024
Zusammenfassung
As the rise of the Anthropocene has led to serious deliberation about how energy is best produced and distributed in a world pressured by both the depletion of natural resources and global climate change, advances in technology have enabled new systems of extracting energy like High Volume Hydraulic Fracturing (HVHF), commonly known as fracking, that complicate these discussions. In this book, Barbara George explores how citizens impacted by HVHF tell stories about environmental risks, the conflict they experience in attempting to articulate these risks, and the hope for a post-carbon future in which HVHF is banned. Deep ideologies linked to history, coal, and industry permeate areas like the Rust Belt and Appalachia and, George argues, create “frames” that encourage and advocate for HVHF and make it difficult for publics in these locales to find a platform to tell their stories in a meaningful way. This book offers a case study of three communities in the United States – New York, Pennsylvania, and Ohio – and how each community frames HVHF environmental and health risks differently based on their differing sociocultural histories. Scholars of communication, environmental studies, history, and sociology may find this book of particular interest.
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Auflage
- 1/2024
- Copyrightjahr
- 2024
- ISBN-Print
- 978-1-6669-2648-4
- ISBN-Online
- 978-1-6669-2649-1
- Verlag
- Lexington, Lanham
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Seiten
- 160
- Produkttyp
- Monographie
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Contents Kein Zugriff
- Figures Kein Zugriff
- Tables Kein Zugriff
- Energy, Environmental Risk, and Public Participation Kein Zugriff
- Ecolinguistics: Storylines, Frames, and Ideologies: Rhetorical Approaches to Risk (Is/ Ought) Kein Zugriff
- Destructive Discourses Kein Zugriff
- Positive and Beneficial Discourses Kein Zugriff
- Participant Selection Kein Zugriff
- Critical Literacies and Environmental Risk Assessment Kein Zugriff
- Methodology and Methods Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- Historical Concept of “Environmental Identities” in Each State Kein Zugriff
- New York—Environment as Wilderness Kein Zugriff
- Pennsylvania—Environment as Resource and Recreation Kein Zugriff
- Current State Identities—Energy Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- Deliberation: Participatory Risk Mechanisms through Environmental Risk Assessments Kein Zugriff
- Competing Science Claims and HVHF Discourse Kein Zugriff
- Neoliberalism and HVHF discourse Kein Zugriff
- Discourse Legitimation Patterns Kein Zugriff
- Rhetorical Analysis Methods: Is/Ought Constructions and Stasis Kein Zugriff
- Lack of Access to Public Meetings Kein Zugriff
- Lack of Access within Public Meetings Kein Zugriff
- Lack of Access on Institutional Sites Kein Zugriff
- Ohio Kein Zugriff
- Pennsylvania Kein Zugriff
- Ohio Kein Zugriff
- Pennsylvania Kein Zugriff
- Ohio Kein Zugriff
- Pennsylvania Kein Zugriff
- Stasis II: HVHF Drilling Contamination Risks—Water and Soil Kein Zugriff
- Ohio Kein Zugriff
- Ohio Kein Zugriff
- Ohio Kein Zugriff
- Pennsylvania Kein Zugriff
- Significance of Institutional Environmental Authority Based on Stasis Analysis Kein Zugriff
- CDA Coding Kein Zugriff
- Legitimation Kein Zugriff
- Economic Rationalism Discourse Patterns—Metaphors/Erasures Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- Positive and Beneficial Discourses in Ohio and Pennsylvania—Salience and Re-minding Kein Zugriff
- In Response: Activist Technical Networks Kein Zugriff
- Social Media as Technical Networks of Environmental Risk Kein Zugriff
- New York Kein Zugriff
- Pennsylvania Kein Zugriff
- Narrative Representations of Environmental Risk Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- Post-positivist Notions of Science: Justice and Precaution—Considering Public Health Kein Zugriff
- Interventions: Counter-Literacies Leading to a New York Ban on HVHF Kein Zugriff
- Notes Kein Zugriff
- New York Kein Zugriff
- Ohio and Pennsylvania Kein Zugriff
- Limitations and Future Study Possibilities Kein Zugriff
- Interviews and Observations (Three to three and a half hours in one day) Kein Zugriff
- Interview Questions, Set 1: Reporting Risks within Local, State and Federal Risk Reporting Sites (30–45 Minutes) Kein Zugriff
- Tap Kein Zugriff
- Interview Questions, Set 2 (30–45 minutes) Kein Zugriff
- Think-Aloud Protocol 2 (45 min–1 hour) Kein Zugriff
- Local, State, and Federal Risk Reporting Agencies Kein Zugriff
- Note Kein Zugriff
- References Kein Zugriff Seiten 139 - 150
- Index Kein Zugriff Seiten 151 - 158
- About the Author Kein Zugriff Seiten 159 - 160
