
Monographie Open Access Vollzugriff
Disentangling Justice
Needs, Equality or Merit? On the Situation-Dependency of Distributive Justice- Autor:innen:
- Reihe:
- Gesellschaftsanalyse, Band 2
- Verlag:
- 2022
Zusammenfassung
Was ist gerecht? Die Wahl einer Allokationsnorm, sei es Gleichheit, Bedarf oder Leistung, kann zu Kooperation führen oder Konflikte begünstigen. Da diese Prinzipien generell unvereinbar sind, sind Menschen bei Verteilungsproblemen gezwungen komplexe Abwägungen zu machen. Ihre Entscheidungen sind dabei von individuellen, kontextuellen sowie situationellen Faktoren beeinflusst. Dieses Buch verfolgt einen Mechanismen-basierten Ansatz, der diese drei Ebenen berücksichtigt und dem Umstand Rechnung trägt, dass die Outcomes bei Verteilungsproblemen interdependent sind. Die Resultate sind in Einklang mit einer funktionalistischen Perspektive und verdeutlichen die inhärente Relevanz der Beziehungsstruktur für die Wahl von Gerechtigkeitsprinzipien.
Schlagworte
Publikation durchsuchen
Bibliographische Angaben
- Copyrightjahr
- 2022
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-8487-8305-2
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-7489-2695-5
- Verlag
- Nomos, Baden-Baden
- Reihe
- Gesellschaftsanalyse
- Band
- 2
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Seiten
- 174
- Produkttyp
- Monographie
Inhaltsverzeichnis
KapitelSeiten
- Titelei/InhaltsverzeichnisSeiten 1 - 16 Download Kapitel (PDF)
- Legitimating the Social Order or Striving to Change it
- What is Fair to Whom, When and Why?
- Goal and Organisation of the Book
- A. Principles of Justice
- Equality
- Need
- Self-Interest Motive
- Reciprocity
- Other-Regarding / Altruistic Preferences and Rationality
- Bad Luck versus Lack of Effort
- Self-Serving Bias
- Belief in a Just World and Rationalisation
- Belief in Meritocracy Legitimises Inequalities
- Equal Opportunities
- Class
- Gender
- Justice, Social Relations and Group Functioning
- Economic Orientation
- Solidarity Orientation
- Caring Orientation
- Order and Authority
- A Situational Framework
- How Contexts Shape Individual Outcomes
- Socialisation and Culture
- The American Dream
- General Population Sample in Switzerland
- University of Bern
- Princeton University
- Survey Experiments
- The Distributional Survey Experiment
- The DSE in the Friends Situation
- The DSE in the Work Situation
- The DSE in the Family Situation
- The DSE in the Public Goods Situation: Scholarships
- Treating Outcomes as Independent
- Treating the Outcomes as Ranks
- Treating the Outcomes as Shares
- Considering the Multilevel Structure
- Descriptive Statistics of Respondent Attributes in the General Population Sample
- Friends: Justice in an Equality Matching Setting
- Work: Justice in a Market Pricing Setting
- Family: Justice in a Communal Sharing Setting
- Scholarship: Justice in a Public Goods Setting
- Gender Differences
- Class Differences
- Class and Merit in the Friends Setting
- Class and Merit in the Work Setting
- Class and Merit in the Family Setting
- Class and Merit in the Public Goods Setting
- Descriptive Statistics of Respondent Attributes in the Student Samples
- Students in Bern and Princeton in the Friends Setting
- Students in Bern and Princeton in the Work Setting
- Students in Bern and Princeton in the Family Setting
- Students in Bern and Princeton in the Public Goods Setting
- Egalitarianism among students in Switzerland and the United States
- Short Summary of Results
- Gender and Class Effects
- Situations and Relational Structures – Fair is What Works Best for the Relationship
- Context Shapes our Opinions on What is Fair
- Limitations
- Concluding Thoughts and Implications
- Bibliography Seiten 151 - 174 Download Kapitel (PDF)




