Cover des Buchs: Popular Politics, Participation and the Elite Gaze in South Africa
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

Popular Politics, Participation and the Elite Gaze in South Africa

Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 14.09.2023

Zusammenfassung

Das Buch stellt die gängige Annahme in Frage, dass partizipative Mechanismen die Demokratie in Gesellschaften, die von Ungleichheit geprägt sind, stärken. Diese ignoriert die Art und Weise, in der sozialer und wirtschaftlicher Status die Gesellschaft ausdifferenziert. Das Buch entwickelt eine Gegenerzählung, ausgehend von den Realitäten eines südafrikanischen Townships und den dort vorherrschenden Machtstrukturen. Es beschreibt die vielfältigen Formen in denen sich Menschen politisch beteiligen und zeigt somit, dass politische Teilhabe, wie sie oftmals im globalen Norden imaginiert wird, ein Privileg nicht nur von Individuen, sondern auch von Gesellschaften ist. Ebenso offenbart sich (erneut) eine tiefe epistemologische Kluft zwischen den Annahmen der Eliten und den Perspektiven der „Regierten“.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Erscheinungsdatum
14.09.2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0233-7
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-3756-2
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Entwicklungstheorie und Entwicklungspolitik
Band
26
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
211
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 12
    1. Framing the inquiry Kein Zugriff
    2. Methodology and Reflexivity Kein Zugriff
    3. Chapter outline Kein Zugriff
    1. A brief history of participation in development discourse and policy Kein Zugriff
      1. Can formal participation mechanisms really increase citizen voice? Kein Zugriff
      2. Whose voice is being heard when civil society speaks? Kein Zugriff
      3. On the ability and willingness of citizens to participate Kein Zugriff
      4. The elite lens of donors Kein Zugriff
    3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. Political participation: stretching the concept Kein Zugriff
    3. The politics in the apolitical: official spaces of participation Kein Zugriff
    4. Leandra’s civil society: concurrence of citizenship and ‘client-ship’ Kein Zugriff
    5. Protest: between direct democracy, insurgency and collective clientelism Kein Zugriff
    6. A promise of citizenship as practice: voting patterns in Leandra Kein Zugriff
    7. Party political activity Kein Zugriff
    8. Everyday forms of resistance Kein Zugriff
    9. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      1. Local regimes of accumulation and patron–client relationships Kein Zugriff
      2. Fluid class formation as an inhibitor of collective action Kein Zugriff
      1. Intra-ANC struggles for resources Kein Zugriff
      2. Powerless councillors? Kein Zugriff
      3. Grey zones of power: the story of local taxi wars Kein Zugriff
    4. The Siqalile story: inequalities within civil society Kein Zugriff
    5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
    2. Ideological deception or limited hegemony? Kein Zugriff
      1. ‘They eat our money’: ideological contestations Kein Zugriff
      1. ‘IDPs are a bluff’: Citizen perceptions of official participation spaces Kein Zugriff
      2. ‘It won’t serve any purpose’—views of actors in local civil society Kein Zugriff
      3. Citizens’ views on electoral participation Kein Zugriff
      4. Limited hegemony: the constraint of experience Kein Zugriff
    5. Mind the Gap: the epistemological divide Kein Zugriff
    6. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
    1. The political economy of participation Kein Zugriff
    2. Revisiting the elite gaze Kein Zugriff
    3. Outlook Kein Zugriff
  8. List of References Kein Zugriff 193 - 208
  9. List of Sources Kein Zugriff 209 - 211

Literaturverzeichnis (209)

  1. Ackermann, J. M. (2005). Social accountability in the public sector: A conceptual discussion (Vol. 82, pp. 1–43). Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar öffnen
  2. Adhikary, R. W. (2012). The World Bank's Shift away from Neoliberal Ideology: real or rhetoric?. Policy Futures in Education, 10(2), 191-200. Google Scholar öffnen
  3. Albertyn, C. & Tjønneland, E. N. (2011). Follow the money! Policies and practices in donor support to civil society formations in southern Africa. Johannesburg: Southern Africa Trust; Available at https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/4109-follow-the-money-policies-and-practices-in-donor.pdf, (Accessed: 4 March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  4. Alexander, P. (2010). Rebellion of the poor: South Africa’s service delivery protests – a preliminary analysis. Review of African Political Economy, 37(123), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056241003637870 Google Scholar öffnen
  5. Alexander, P., Ceruti, C., Motseke, K., Phadi, M. & Wale, K. (eds.) (2013). Class in Soweto. Scottsville, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  6. Anciano, F. (2018). Clientelism as civil society? Unpacking the relationship between clientelism and democracy at the local level in South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 53(4), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909617709487 Google Scholar öffnen
  7. Auyero, J. (1999). ‘From the client’s point(s) of view’: How poor people perceive and evaluate political clientelism. Theory and Society, 28(2), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006905214896 Google Scholar öffnen
  8. Auyero, J. (2006). The political makings of the 2001 lootings in Argentina. Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X06000708 Google Scholar öffnen
  9. Auyero, J., & Benzecry, C. (2017). The practical logic of political domination: Conceptualizing the clientelist habitus. Sociological Theory, 35(3), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117725767 Google Scholar öffnen
  10. Avritzer, L. (2009). Democracy and public space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400825011 Google Scholar öffnen
  11. Bähre, E. (2007). Beyond legibility: Violence, conflict and development in a South African Township. African Studies, 66(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020180701275956 Google Scholar öffnen
  12. Ballard, R. (2008). Between the community hall and the city hall: Five research questions on participation. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 66(1), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.0.0004 Google Scholar öffnen
  13. Ballard, R., Habib, A., & Valodia, I. (2006). Voices of protest: Social movements in post-apartheid South Africa. Scottsville: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  14. Bebbington, A. (2004). Theorizing participation and institutional change: ethnography and political economy. In Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 278–283). London: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  15. Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (2008). Introduction: The place of participation in South African local democracy. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 66(1), i–vii. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.0.0001 Google Scholar öffnen
  16. Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (2012). Party politics, civil society and local democracy – Reflections from Johannesburg. Geoforum, 43(2), 178–189. Google Scholar öffnen
  17. Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (ed.). (2015). Popular politics in South African cities: Unpacking community participation. Cape Town: HSRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  18. Bénit-Gbaffou, C., & Katsaura, O. (2014). Community leadership and the construction of political legitimacy: Unpacking Bourdieu’s ‘Political Capital’ in post-Apartheid Johannesburg. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1807–1832. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12166 Google Scholar öffnen
  19. Bénit-Gbaffou, C., & Mkwanazi, E. (2015). Constructing communities in public meetings: local leaders and the management of xenophobic discourses in Yeoville. In Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (ed.) Popular politics in South African cities: Unpacking community participation. Cape Town: HSRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  20. Beresford, A. (2015). Power, patronage, and gatekeeper politics in South Africa. African Affairs, 114(455), 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adu083 Google Scholar öffnen
  21. Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475 Google Scholar öffnen
  22. Bhatnagar, D. et al. (2004) Participatory budgeting in Brazil. [Online] 20. World Bank. Available at: https://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/14657_Partic-Budg-Brazil-web.pdf (Accessed 22 March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  23. Bierschenk, T., Chauveau, J.-P. O. and de Sardan, J.-P. O. (2002). Local development brokers in Africa: The rise of a new social category. Working Paper 13. Mainz: Universität Mainz, Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238525564_Local_Development_Brokers_in_Africa_The_Rise_of_a_New_Social_Category (Accessed 22 March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  24. Bohne, M. (2018). FAQ: Wer sind die ‘Gelbwesten’? tagesschau.de. Available at: https://www.tagesschau.de/ausland/gelbwesten-faq-101.html (Accessed: 13 December 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  25. Booysen, S. (2011). The African National Congress and the regeneration of political power. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  26. Bornman, J. (2016). Taxi boss of eMbalenhle just can’t stop giving to the needy. Sunday Times, 1 March. Available at: http://www.timeslive.co.za/sundaytimes/realheroes/2016/01/03/Taxi-boss-of-eMbalenhle-just-can%E2%80%99t-stop-giving-to-the-needy (Accessed: 26 July 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  27. Braun, M. (2018). Wohnungsnot und steigende Mieten: Häuserkampf in Rom. Available at: https://www.taz.de/!5555939/ (Accessed: 5 April 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  28. Brown, D. (2004). Participation in poverty reduction strategies: Democracy strengthened or democracy undermined? In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London, New York: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  29. Brown, D. J. (2015). South Africa's insurgent citizens: on dissent and the possibility of politics. Bloomsbury Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen
  30. Butler, A. (2015). The politics of numbers: National membership growth and subnational power competition in the African National Congress. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 87(1), pp. 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2015.0008 Google Scholar öffnen
  31. Butler, A., & Southall, R. (2015). Introduction: Understanding the ANC at sub-national level. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 87(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2015.0006 Google Scholar öffnen
  32. Carothers, T. (2008). Democracy assistance: Political vs. developmental? Journal of Democracy, 20(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0047 Google Scholar öffnen
  33. Centre for Policy Studies. (2002). Analytical overview of the political economy of the civil society sector in Southern Africa with regard to the poverty reduction agenda. Johannesburg: Centre for Policy Studies. Google Scholar öffnen
  34. Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 Google Scholar öffnen
  35. Chandhoke, N. (2007). Civil society. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469658 Google Scholar öffnen
  36. Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed – Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  37. Chingwete, A. (2016). In South Africa, citizen’s trust in president, political institutions drops sharply. Afrobarometer Dispatch 90. Afrobarometer & The Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, pp. 1–12. Available at: http://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/publications/Dispatches/ab_r6_dispatchno90_south_africa_trust_in_officials.pdf (Accessed: 28 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  38. Civicus. (2015). State of civil society report 2014. Available at: http://civicus.org/images/SOCS%202014%20Full%20Report.pdf (Accessed: 3 March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  39. Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (eds.) Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 36–55). London: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  40. Cole, T. (2012). The white-savior industrial complex. The Atlantic, 21(March). Google Scholar öffnen
  41. Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (eds.) (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  42. Cornwall, A. (2002). Beneficiary, consumer, citizen: Perspectives on participation for poverty reduction. Gothenburg: SIDA (SIDA studies, 2). Available at: https://www.participatorymethods.org/sites/participatorymethods.org/files/beneficiary%20consumer%20citizens_cornwall.pdf, (Accessed: 21 April 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  43. Cornwall, A. (2006). Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 44(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624460 Google Scholar öffnen
  44. Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). What do buzzwords do for development policy? A critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’. Third World Quarterly, 26(7), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500235603 Google Scholar öffnen
  45. Cornwall, A., & Eade, D. (2010). Deconstructing development discourse: Buzzwords and fuzzwords. Oxfam GB. Google Scholar öffnen
  46. Craig, D., & Porter, D. (1997). Framing participation. Development in Practice, 7(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614529754468 Google Scholar öffnen
  47. Craig, D., & Porter, D. (2003). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A new convergence. World Development, 31(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00147-X Google Scholar öffnen
  48. Dalton, R. J. (2017). The participation gap: Social status and political inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198733607.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen
  49. Dawson, H. J. (2014). Patronage from below: Political unrest in an informal settlement in South Africa. African Affairs, 113(453), 518–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adu056 Google Scholar öffnen
  50. Denhardt, J., Terry, L., Delacruz, E. R., & Andonoska, L. (2009). Barriers to citizen engagement in developing countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(14), 1268–1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690903344726 Google Scholar öffnen
  51. Dietrich, S. (2021). States, markets, and foreign aid. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  52. Dlamini, J. (2011). ‘Voortrekker’, in von Holdt, K. et al. (eds) The smoke that calls: Insurgent citizenship, collective violence and the struggle for a place in the new South Africa. Eight case studies of community protest and xenophobic violence. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation; Society, Work and Development Institute. Available at: https://www.csvr.org.za/docs/thesmokethatcalls.pdf (Accessed: 28 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  53. Dlamini, J., Langa, M. and von Holdt, K. (2011). Kungcatsha, in The smoke that calls: insurgent citizenship, collective violence and the struggle for a place in the new South Africa. Eight case studies of community protest and xenophobic violence. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation; Society, Work and Development Institute. Available at: https://www.csvr.org.za/docs/thesmokethatcalls.pdf (Accessed: 28 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  54. Dlamini, N., Mtshali, S., & Simelane, H. (n.d.). From violent protests to engagement (p. 24). Johannesburg: PlanAct; Available at http://www.planact.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Siqalile-Leandra-Report-From-Violent-Protests-to-Engagements.pdf (Accessed: 28 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  55. Dugard, J. (2001). From low intensity to Mafia war: Taxi violence in South Africa (1987–2000) (Vol. 4). Johannesburg: CSVR; Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238085248_From_Low_Intensity_War_to_Mafia_War_Taxi_violence_in_South_Africa_1987_-_2000 (Accessed: 28 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  56. Duncan, J. (2016). Protest nation: The right to protest in South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  57. Eckert, J. M. (2022). Anthropology and Political Participation, in Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of political participation. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  58. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001 Google Scholar öffnen
  59. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  60. Everatt, D., Marais, H., & Dube, N. (2010). Participation … for what purpose? Analysing the depth and quality of public participation in the Integrated Development Planning process in Gauteng. Politikon, 37(2–3), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2010.522333 Google Scholar öffnen
  61. Fakir, E., & Holland, W. (2011). Changing voting patterns? Electoral Institute of South Africa, EISA, 46(3.1), 1139–1152. Google Scholar öffnen
  62. Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  63. Fiegler, T. and Lutz, R. (2011) Armut und Teilhabe im städtischen Kontext, wegweiser-bürgergesellschaft.de. (Stiftung Mitarbeit). Available at: http://www.buergergesellschaft.de/fileadmin/pdf/gastbeitrag_fiegler_lutz_110218.pdf (Accessed: 28 July 2015). Google Scholar öffnen
  64. Fioramonti, L. (2005). Civil societies and democratization: Assumptions, dilemmas and the South African experience. Theoria, 52(107), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.3167/004058105780956804 Google Scholar öffnen
  65. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. (C. Gordon, ed. C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, transl.) New York: Pantheon Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  66. Foucault, M. (1984). The Foucault Reader: An introduction to Foucault’s thought. (P. Rabinow, ed.). London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  67. Fowler, A. (2014). Civil society and aid in Africa: A case of mistaken identity? In E. Obadare (ed.) The Handbook of Civil Society in Africa (pp. 417–438). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8262-8_23 Google Scholar öffnen
  68. Fraser, A. (2005). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: Now who calls the shots? Review of African Political Economy, 32(104/105), 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056240500329346 Google Scholar öffnen
  69. Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240 Google Scholar öffnen
  70. Frey, K. (2008). Development, good governance, and local democracy, Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), 3(se). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1981-38212008000100007. Google Scholar öffnen
  71. Friedman, S. (2006). Participatory governance and citizen action in post-apartheid South Africa (pp. 1–22). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies; Available at https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_193613.pdf (Accessed: 31 January 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  72. Friedman, S. (2012). Democracy as an open-ended utopia: Reviving a sense of uncoerced political possibility. Theoria, 59(130), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2012.5913001 Google Scholar öffnen
  73. Friedman, S. (2015). Archipelagos of dominance. Party fiefdoms and South African democracy. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 9(3), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-015-0246-9 Google Scholar öffnen
  74. Friedman, S. (2018a). Power in action: democracy, collective action and social justice. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/12018113023 Google Scholar öffnen
  75. Friedman, S. (2018b). Protest action has been a constant for decades. HuffPost South Africa. Available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.co.za/2018/02/19/protest-action-has-been-a-constant-for-decades_a_23365064/ (Accessed: 24 May 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  76. Friedman, S. & McKaiser, E. (2010). Civil society and the post-Polokwane South African state: Assessing civil society’s prospects of improved policy engagement Commissioned by the Heinrich Böll Foundation. Centre for the Study of Democracy, Rhodes University/University of Johannesburg. Available at: https://za.boell.org/sites/default/files/downloads/CSD_Friedman_study_booklet_web.pdf (Accessed: 21 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  77. Friedman, S. & Mottiar, S. (2004). A moral to the tale: The Treatment Action Campaign and the politics of HIV/AIDS. University of Kwa-Zulu Natal. Available at: https://www.escr-net.org/sites/default/files/Friedman_Mottier_-__A_Moral_to_the_Tale.pdf (Accessed: 31 January 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  78. Friedman, S., & Reitzes, M. (1996). Democratisation or bureaucratisation? Civil society, the public sphere and the state in post-apartheid South Africa. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 29, 55–73. Google Scholar öffnen
  79. Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361 Google Scholar öffnen
  80. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London, New York: Verso. Google Scholar öffnen
  81. Gaventa, J. (2004). Towards participatory governance: Assessing the transformative possibilities. In Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (eds.) Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 278–283). London: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  82. Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2010). So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. IDS Working Paper, 2010(347), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x Google Scholar öffnen
  83. Gaventa, J., & Martorano, B. (2016). Inequality, power and participation – revisiting the links. IDS Bulletin, 47(5), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.164 Google Scholar öffnen
  84. Gay, R. (1998). Rethinking clientelism: Demands, discourses and practices in contemporary Brazil. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe, 65: 7–24. Google Scholar öffnen
  85. Geertz, C. (2009). From our archives: Common sense as a cultural system. The Antioch Review, 67(4), 770–790. https://doi.org/10.2307/4637616 Google Scholar öffnen
  86. Gervasoni, C. (2010). A rentier theory of subnational regimes: Fiscal federalism, democracy, and authoritarianism in the Argentine provinces. World Politics, 62(02), 302–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000067 Google Scholar öffnen
  87. Goldfrank, B. (2007). The politics of deepening local democracy: Decentralization, party institutionalization, and participation. Comparative Politics, 39(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/20434031 Google Scholar öffnen
  88. Graham, V., Sadie, Y., & Patel, L. (2016). Social grants, food parcels and voting behaviour: A case study of three South African communities. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 91(1), 106–135. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2016.0020 Google Scholar öffnen
  89. Gramsci, A. (2000). The Gramsci reader: Selected writings, 1916–1935. (D. Forgacs, ed.). New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  90. Greef, K. de (2018). In South Africa’s ‘Mafia-like’ taxi industry – 11 die in latest attack, The New York Times, 22 July. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/22/world/africa/south-africa-taxi-attack.html (Accessed: 15 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  91. Green, P., & Cornell, D. (2005). Rethinking democratic theory: The American case. Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(4), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2005.00291.x Google Scholar öffnen
  92. Grindle, M. (2010). Good governance: The inflation of an idea. RWP10-023. Harvard Kennedy School, Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Available at: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4448993/Grindle_GoodGovernance.pdf?sequence=1&origin=publication_detail (Accessed: 31 January 2009). Google Scholar öffnen
  93. Grootes, S. (2017). ANC leadership race: with Mpumalanga’s massive growth, it’s now David Mabuza, the decider. Be very afraid, Daily Maverick. Available at: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-10-09-anc-leadership-race-with-mpumalangas-massive-growth-its-now-david-mabuza-the-decider-be-very-afraid/ (Accessed: 8 November 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  94. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442 Google Scholar öffnen
  95. Haysom, N. (1986). Mabangalala: The rise of right-wing vigilantes in South Africa. Johannesburg: Centre for Applied Legal Studies, University of Witwatersrand. Google Scholar öffnen
  96. Hayward, C. R. (2000). De-facing power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490255 Google Scholar öffnen
  97. Heller, P. (2009). Democratic deepening in India and South Africa. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 44(1), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909608098679 Google Scholar öffnen
  98. Heller, P. & Ntlokonkulu, L. (2001). A civic movement, or a movement of civics? The South African National Civic Organisation in the post-apartheid period. Centre for Policy Studies (84). Available at: http://ccs.ukzn.ac.za/files/84cover%20(sanco).pdf (Accessed: 21 January 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  99. Heller, P., & Rao, V. (eds.) (2015). Equity and Development Series Deliberation and development: Rethinking the role of voice and collective action in unequal societies. Washington, DC: The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0501-1 Google Scholar öffnen
  100. Helliker, K. (2014). Imagining civil society in Zimbabwe and ‘most of the world’. In E. Obadare (ed.), The Handbook of Civil Society in Africa (pp. 157–173). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8262-8_11 Google Scholar öffnen
  101. Hewitt, V. (2006). A cautionary tale: Colonial and post-colonial conceptions of good government and democratisation in Africa. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 44(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624437 Google Scholar öffnen
  102. Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. London, New York: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  103. von Holdt, K. (2010a). Institutionalisation, strike violence and local moral orders. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 72(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.0.0063 Google Scholar öffnen
  104. von Holdt, K. (2010b). Nationalism, bureaucracy and the developmental state: The South African case. South African Review of Sociology, 41(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528581003676010 Google Scholar öffnen
  105. von Holdt, K. et al. (eds.) (2011). The smoke that calls: Insurgent citizenship, collective violence and the struggle for a place in the new South Africa. Eight case studies of community protest and xenophobic violence. Johannesburg: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation; Society, Work and Development Institute. Available at: https://www.csvr.org.za/docs/thesmokethatcalls.pdf (Accessed: 28 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  106. von Holdt, K. (2014). On violent democracy. The Sociological Review, 62(2 suppl.), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12196. Google Scholar öffnen
  107. Holland, J., Brocklesby, M. A., & Abugre, C. (2004). Beyond the technial fix? participation in donor approaches to rights based development. In Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (eds.), Participation: From tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 252–268). London, New York: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  108. Holloway, J. (2005). Change the world without taking power. London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  109. Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent citizenship in an era of global urban peripheries. City & Society, 21(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2009.01024.x Google Scholar öffnen
  110. Houtzager, P. P., & Gurza Lavalle, A. (2010). Civil Society’s Claims to Political Representation in Brazil. Studies in Comparative International Development, 45(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9059-7 Google Scholar öffnen
  111. Ingold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography! HAU, 4(1), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.021 Google Scholar öffnen
  112. James, D. (2012). Money-go-round: Personal economies of wealth, aspiration and indebtedness. Africa, 82(01), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001972011000714 Google Scholar öffnen
  113. Jaramillo, N. E., & Carreon, M. E. (2014). Pedagogies of resistance and solidarity: towards revolutionary and decolonial praxis. Interface: A Journal for and about Social Movements, 6(1), 392–411. Google Scholar öffnen
  114. Joshi, A., & Houtzager, P. P. (2012). Widgets or watchdogs? Conceptual explorations in social accountability. Public Management Review, 14(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657837 Google Scholar öffnen
  115. Joshi, D., & O'Dell, R. K. (2013). Global governance and development ideology: The United Nations and the World Bank on the left-right spectrum. Global Governance, 19, 249. Google Scholar öffnen
  116. Kapoor, I. (2005). Participatory development, complicity and desire. Third World Quarterly, 26(8), 1203–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500336849 Google Scholar öffnen
  117. Katsaura, R. (2015). Ritualistic spaces? Re-examining invited spaces of participation. In C. Bénit-Gbaffou (ed.), Popular Politics in South African Cities: Unpacking Community Participation. Cape Town: HSRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  118. Kelly, G. (2017). Everything you need to know about social grants. GroundUp News. Available at: https://www.groundup.org.za/article/everything-you-need-know-about-social-grants_820/ (Accessed: 18 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  119. Kerner, I. (2017). Transnational governmentality and civil society, in Ricci, G. R. (ed.) The Persistence of Critical Theory. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers (Culture & Civilization). Google Scholar öffnen
  120. Legassik, M., & Wolpe, H. (1976). The Bantustans and capital accumulation in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 3(7), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056247608703302 Google Scholar öffnen
  121. Lemanski, C. (2017). Unequal citizenship in unequal cities: Participatory urban governance in contemporary South Africa. International Development Planning Review, 39(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2017.2 Google Scholar öffnen
  122. Lodge, T. (1999). Policy processes within the African National Congress and the tripartite alliance. Politikon, 26(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589349908705068 Google Scholar öffnen
  123. Lodge, T. (2014). Neo-patrimonial politics in the ANC. African Affairs, 113(450), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adt069 Google Scholar öffnen
  124. Lukes, S. (2004). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, New York: Macmillan International Higher Education. Google Scholar öffnen
  125. Luruli, S., & Chapisa, F. G. (2012) Leandra Situational Analysis. Johannesburg: PlanAct. (unpublished report). Google Scholar öffnen
  126. Malabela, M. (2015). Members of members: The ANC’s Manzini branch in Mpumalanga. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 87(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2015.0007 Google Scholar öffnen
  127. Malabela, M., & Ally, S. (2011). ‘The people shall speak’? The ward system and constrained participatory democracy: A case study of Chochocho, Mpumalanga. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 76(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2011.0023 Google Scholar öffnen
  128. Malena, C. (2004). Social accountability: An introduction to the concept and emerging practice [Participation and Civic Engagement]. Social Development Papers, 76, 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen
  129. Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Kampala: Fountain Publishers (Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History). Google Scholar öffnen
  130. Mansbridge, J. J. (1980). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  131. Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing development: Does participation work? Washington, DC: World Bank; https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213- Google Scholar öffnen
  132. Marsh, E., & Naidoo, A. (2013). Final evaluation of the expanding & strengthening community based participation in local government. Brussels: TRANSTEC for the European Commission. Google Scholar öffnen
  133. Matlala, B., & Bénit-Gbaffou, C. (2012). Against ourselves – local activists and the management of contradicting political loyalties: The case of Phiri, Johannesburg. Geoforum, 43(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.005 Google Scholar öffnen
  134. Maxwell, S. (2001). WDR 2000: Is there a new poverty agenda? Development Policy Review, 19(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00128 Google Scholar öffnen
  135. McCulloch, N., & Piron, L. H. (2019). Thinking and working politically: learning from practice. Overview to special issue. Development Policy Review, 37, O1-O15. Google Scholar öffnen
  136. McGee, R., & Gaventa, J. (2011). Shifting power? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. IDS Working Paper, 2011(383), 1–39. https://www.ids.ac.uk/publications/shifting-power-assessing-the-impact-of-transparency-and-accountability-initiatives/ (Accessed: 15 July 2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2011.00383_2.x Google Scholar öffnen
  137. McGee, R. & Norton, A. (2000). Participation in poverty reduction strategies: a synthesis of experience with participatory approaches to policy design, implementation and monitoring. IDS Working Paper 109. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies, pp. 1–84. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/3440 (Accessed: 27 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  138. McGregor, L., Frazer, S. M., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2020). Thinking and working politically. RTI Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  139. McKinley, D. (2016). Lessons in community-based resistance? South Africa’s Anti-Privatisation Forum. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 34(2), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2016.1202558 Google Scholar öffnen
  140. McMann, K. M. (2006). Economic autonomy and democracy: Hybrid regimes in Russia and Kyryzstan. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510281 Google Scholar öffnen
  141. Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps027ra Google Scholar öffnen
  142. Miraftab, F. (2006). Feminist praxis, citizenship and informal politics: Reflections on South Africa’s anti-eviction campaign. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740600612830 Google Scholar öffnen
  143. Mohan, G. (2001). Beyond participation: Strategies for deeper empowerment. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 153–167). London: Zed Books; Available at https://scholar.google.de/scholar?hl=de&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=critical+view+empowerment&btnG= Google Scholar öffnen
  144. Mohanty, R., Thompson, L. & Coelho, V. S. (2011). Mobilising the state? Social mobilisation and state interaction in India, Brazil and South Africa. IDS Working Papers, 2011 (359), 01–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2011.00359_2.x Google Scholar öffnen
  145. Morrell, R., Jewkes, R., & Lindegger, G. (2012). Hegemonic masculinity/masculinities in South Africa: Culture, power, and gender politics. Men and Masculinities, 15(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X12438001 Google Scholar öffnen
  146. Mosoetsa, S. (2011). Eating from one pot: The dynamics of survival in poor South African households. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. https://doi.org/10.18772/12011045331 Google Scholar öffnen
  147. Mosse, D. (2001). ‘People’s knowledge’, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 16–35). London, New York: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  148. Mosse, D. (2003). The making and marketing of participatory development. In van Ufford, P. & Giri, A (eds.), A moral critique of development: In search of global responsibilities. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  149. Mosse, D. (2004). Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change, 35(4), 639–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2004.00374.x Google Scholar öffnen
  150. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen
  151. Ndletyana, M. (2015). African National Congress: From an emancipatory to a rent-seeking instrument. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 87(1), pp. 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2015.0003 Google Scholar öffnen
  152. Nicolson, G. (2015). South Africa: where 12 million live in extreme poverty, Daily Maverick. Available at: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2015-02-03-south-africa-where-12-million-live-in-extreme-poverty/ (Accessed: 29 October 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  153. Nkosi, T. (2018). Graphic: how DD did it. Ziwaphi, 1 October. Available at: http://www.ziwaphi.com/2018/10/01/graphic-how-dd-did-it/ (Accessed: 10 January 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  154. Nzimakwe, T. I. (2008). Addressing unemployment and poverty through public works programmes in South Africa. International NGP Journal, 3(12), 207–212. Google Scholar öffnen
  155. Obadare, E. (ed.) (2014). The handbook of civil society in Africa. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8262-8 Google Scholar öffnen
  156. O’Donnell, G. A. (2004). Why the rule of law matters. Journal of Democracy, 15(4), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2004.0076 Google Scholar öffnen
  157. Olver, C. (2018). Patronage and politics in a South African city: A case study of Nelson Mandela Bay. Area Development and Policy, 3(3), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1440971 Google Scholar öffnen
  158. O’Neil, T., Foresti, M., & Hudson, A. (2007). Evaluation of citizens’ voice and accountability: review of the literature and donor approaches report (p. 60). London: DFID; Available at https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/237.pdf, (Accessed: 27 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  159. Onishi, N. & Gebrekidan, S. (2018a), Hit men and power: South Africa’s leaders are killing one another’, The New York Times, 1 November. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/world/africa/south-africa-anc-killings.html (Accessed: 18 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  160. Onishi, N. & Gebrekidan, S. (2018b) South Africa vows to end corruption: Are its new leaders part of the problem? Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/04/world/africa/south-africa-anc-david-mabuza.html (Accessed: 15 August 2018). Google Scholar öffnen
  161. People’s Assembly (2010). Corruption whistle-blowers killed in Mpumalanga. Available at: http://www.pa.org.za/hansard/2010/august/31/proceedings-of-the-national-assembly-tuesday-31--2/corruption-whistle-blowers-killed-in-mpumalanga-me (Accessed: 24 February 2016). Google Scholar öffnen
  162. Pettit, J. et al. (2015). Evaluation of the strategy for support via Swedish civil society organisations 2010-2014. Available at: https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/7130 (Accessed: 29 May 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
  163. Pettit, J. (2016). Why citizens don’t engage – Power, poverty and civic habitus. IDS Bulletin, 47(5), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.169 Google Scholar öffnen
  164. Piper, L. (2015). From party-state to party-society in South Africa: SANCO and the informal politics of community representation in Imizamo Yethu, Cape Town. In C. Bénit-Gbaffou (ed.), Popular Politics in South African Cities: Unpacking Community Participation (pp. 21–41). Cape Town: HSRC Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  165. Piper, L., & Anciano, F. (2015). Party over outsiders, centre over branch: How ANC dominance works at the community level in South Africa. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 87(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.2015.0001 Google Scholar öffnen
  166. Piper, L., & Deacon, R. (2008). Party politics, elite accountability and public participation: Ward committee politics in the Msunduzi Municipality. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa, 66(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/trn.0.0007 Google Scholar öffnen
  167. Piper, L. & von Lieres, B. (eds) (2014). Mediated citizenship: The informal politics of speaking for citizens in the global south. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen
  168. Pithouse, R. (2006). Rethinking public participation from below. Critical Dialogue, 2(2), 24–30. Google Scholar öffnen
  169. Pithouse, R. (2009). Abahlali base Mjondolo and the struggle for the city in Durban, South Africa. Cidades, 6(9), 241–270. Google Scholar öffnen
  170. Posel, D. (2010). Races to consume: Revisiting South Africa’s history of race, consumption and the struggle for freedom. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870903428505 Google Scholar öffnen
  171. Rancière, J. (2006). Democracy, republic, representation. Constellations, 13(3), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2006.00402.x Google Scholar öffnen
  172. Ridge Times (2016). Residents demand municipal manager return to his position. Available at: http://ridgetimes.co.za/60377/residents-demand-municipal-manager-back/ (Accessed: 18 April 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
  173. Ritchie, J. (2003). The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In Ritchie, J. & Lewis J. (eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 24–46). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage; Available at http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.41-1319 Google Scholar öffnen
  174. Robins, S., Cornwall, A., & von Lieres, B. (2008). Rethinking ‘citizenship’ in the postcolony. Third World Quarterly, 29(6), 1069–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590802201048 Google Scholar öffnen
  175. Robinson, M., & Friedman, S. (2007). Civil society, democratization, and foreign aid: Civic engagement and public policy in South Africa and Uganda. Democratization, 14(4), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701398329 Google Scholar öffnen
  176. Robson, T. (2000). The state and community action. London: Pluto Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  177. Rocha Menocal, A. & Sharma, B. (2008). Joint evaluation of citizen’s voice and accountability: Synthesis report. London: DFID. Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/3425.pdf (Accessed: 27 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  178. Sachs, W. (1992). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power. London: Zed Books. Google Scholar öffnen
  179. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge & Kegan. Google Scholar öffnen
  180. Samson, M. (2007). When public works programmes create ‘second economy’ conditions. Africanus, 37(2), 244–256. Google Scholar öffnen
  181. de Sardan, J.-P. O. (1999). A moral economy of corruption in Africa? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 37(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X99002992 Google Scholar öffnen
  182. Schild, V. (2007). Empowering ‘consumer-citizens’ or governing poor female subjects? The institutionalization of ‘self-development’ in the Chilean social policy field. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540507077672 Google Scholar öffnen
  183. Schöneberg, J., & Ziai, A. (Eds.). (2021). Dekolonisierung der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit und Postdevelopment Alternativen: AkteurInnen, Institutionen, Praxis (Vol. 21). Nomos Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen
  184. Schönwälder, G. (1997). New democratic spaces at the grassroots? Popular participation in Latin American local governments. Development and Change, 28(4), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00063 Google Scholar öffnen
  185. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  186. Scott, J. C. (2012). Two cheers for anarchism. Oxford, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400844623 Google Scholar öffnen
  187. Seekings, J. (2000). After apartheid: Civic organizations in the ‘new’ South Africa. In Adler, G. and Steinberg, J (eds.), From comrades to citizens (pp. 205–224). London: Palgrave Macmillan; Available at http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ujlink-ebooks, (Accessed: 3 January 2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596207_8 Google Scholar öffnen
  188. Seekings, J. (2015). Continuity and change in the South African class structure since the end of apartheid (vol. 355, pp. 1–34). Cape Town: University of Cape Town; Available at cssr.uct.ac.za/pub/wp/355/, (Accessed: 3 January 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  189. Seekings, J., & Nattrass, N. (2015). The ‘rebellion of the poor’, social movements and the limits of insurgent citizenship. In Seekings, J. & Nattrass, N. (eds.), Policy, politics and poverty in South Africa (pp. 233–253). London: Palgrave Macmillan; https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137452696_10 Google Scholar öffnen
  190. Sidel, J. T. (2014). Economic foundations of subnational authoritarianism: Insights and evidence from qualitative and quantitative research. Democratization, 21(1), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.725725 Google Scholar öffnen
  191. Sinwell, L. (2011). Rethinking South Africa’s transition: From transformative to mainstream approaches to participatory development. African Studies, 70(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2011.628798 Google Scholar öffnen
  192. Smith, T. (2004). The potential for participatory budgeting in South Africa: A case study of the ‘people’s budget’ in eThekwini Municipality. Grant Report. Durban: Centre for Civil Society/University of KwaZulu Natal, pp. 1–37. Available at: http://ccs.ukzn.ac.za/default.asp?3,28,10,2397 (Accessed: 27 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  193. Snape, D., & Spencer, L. (2003). The foundations of qualitative research. In Ritchie, L., Lewis, J., Nicolls, C., & Ormston. R. (eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 2–23). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications; Available at http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.41-1319 Google Scholar öffnen
  194. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? in Morris, R. C. (ed.), Can the subaltern speak? Reflection on the history of an idea. New York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_20 Google Scholar öffnen
  195. Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. The American Political Science Review, 99(03), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683 Google Scholar öffnen
  196. Tarrow, S. (2012). Contentious politics and social movements (pp. 16–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511973529.003 Google Scholar öffnen
  197. Tembo, F. & Wells, A. (2007). Multi-donor support to civil society and engaging with ‘non-traditional’civil society. A light-touch review of DfID’s portfolio. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan043913.pdf (Accessed: 18 August 2017). Google Scholar öffnen
  198. Tshabalala, E. L., & Lombard, A. (2009). Community participation in the integrated development plan: A case study of the Govan Mbeki Municipality. Journal of Public Administration, 44(2), 396–409. Google Scholar öffnen
  199. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1999). Civic participation and the equality problem. In Skopcol, T. & Fiorina, M. P. (eds.), Civic Engagement in American Democracy. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar öffnen
  200. Wa Azania, M. (2013). Why the poor vote for the ANC and will do so for a long time. Mail & Guardian, 9 September. Available at: https://thoughtleader.co.za/malaikawaazania/2013/09/09/why-the-poor-vote-for-the-anc-and-will-do-so-for-a-long-time/ (Accessed: 15 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  201. Wampler, B., & Touchton, M. (2017). Participatory budgeting: adoption and transformation, 1- 16. Brighton, Sussex: Institute for Development Studies; Available at https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/13366 (Accessed: 27 February 2019). Google Scholar öffnen
  202. Williams, D. (2002). Aid as autobiography. Africa, 72(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.3366/afr.2002.72.1.150 Google Scholar öffnen
  203. Williams, G. (2004). Evaluating participatory development: Tyranny, power and (re)politicization. Third World Quarterly, 25(3), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000191438 Google Scholar öffnen
  204. Wood, K., Maforah, F., & Jewkes, R. (1998). ‘He forced me to love him’: Putting violence on adolescent sexual health agendas. Social Science & Medicine, 47(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00057-4 Google Scholar öffnen
  205. Ziai, A. (2010). Postkoloniale Perspektiven auf „Entwicklung”. Peripherie – Politik, Ökonomie, Kultur, 30(120), 28. Google Scholar öffnen
  206. Ziai, A. (2013). Frohe Weihnachten Afrika! Rassismus in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik, 36, 15–19. Google Scholar öffnen
  207. Ziai, A. (2015). Post-development: Premature burials and haunting ghosts. Development and Change, 46(4), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12177 Google Scholar öffnen
  208. Zuern, E. (2004). Continuity in Contradiction?: The Prospects for a National Civic Movement in a Democratic State: SANCO and the ANC in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Google Scholar öffnen
  209. Zuern, E. (2011). The politics of necessity. Madison, London: The University of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar öffnen

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus dem Schwerpunkt "Kulturgeschichte & Kulturwissenschaft", "Bildung allgemein"
Cover der Ausgabe: Kursbuch Jahrgang 61 (2025), Heft 224
Ausgabe Kein Zugriff
Jahrgang 61 (2025), Heft 224
Kursbuch
Cover des Buchs: Sichtbarkeit von weiblicher wissenschaftlicher Leistung im Fokus
Sammelband Vollzugriff
Ergebnisse aus drei Projekten der BMBF-Förderlinie „Innovative Frauen im Fokus"
Sichtbarkeit von weiblicher wissenschaftlicher Leistung im Fokus
Cover des Buchs: Dramen-Analyse
Lehrbuch Kein Zugriff
Einführung
Dramen-Analyse
Cover des Buchs: Sportmanagement
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Praxishandbuch
Sportmanagement
Cover des Buchs: Nachhaltige Entwicklung und globale Ungleichheit
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Eine wissenspolitologische Studie über die Entwicklungsagenda der Vereinten Nationen
Nachhaltige Entwicklung und globale Ungleichheit

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Willkommen auf Inlibra – Ihrer Plattform für digitale Fachinformationen

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI und über 100 weitere Verlage bündeln hier ihre Inhalte zu einer der größten Plattformen für digitale Fachinformationen.

Effizient recherchieren, langfristig zitieren, verlässlich nutzen – alles vereint an einem Ort.

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login via Open Athens
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex