Cover of book: Kontextualismus
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Kontextualismus

Grundlagen und Anwendungsfelder in Politik und Recht
Authors:
Publisher:
 2019

Bibliographic data

Edition
1/2019
Copyright year
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5815-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9932-7
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Politik und Recht
Language
German
Pages
314
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 20
  2. Teil I Kontext, Rationalität und die Idee der Sozialwissenschaften No access 21 - 22
    1. Kontext, Kontextualismus und Anti-Essentialismus No access
    2. Zwei Grundannahmen des Kontextualismus No access
    3. Der Kontext der Rationalität … No access
    4. … und die Rolle der Sozialwissenschaften No access
    5. Funktionale Differenzierung: Politik und Recht in der Europäischen Union No access
    6. Die Krise der Europäischen Union und das Interessenparadigma der Integration No access
    7. Die Trennung rechtlicher und politisch-demokratischer Rationalisierung No access
    8. Die praktische Dimension europäischer Werte No access
    9. Krisen als Motor der Integration? No access
    10. Europäische Integration durch Recht No access
    11. Die Kontextrationalität des Rechts No access
    12. „Politics in Robes“: Der Aktivismus des Europäischen Gerichtshofs? No access
    13. Die Transklusion des Rechts als Motor der europäischen Integration No access
    14. Kontextualismus und Weltgesellschaft No access
    15. Wozu braucht die Weltgesellschaft noch Staaten? No access
    16. Kontextuelle „Anverwandlungen“ No access
    17. Integration kontextueller Differenz oder kontextuelle Differenz der Integration? No access
    1. 2.1 The Concept of Rationality and Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Language No access
    2. 2.2 Rational Choice and “Trivial Rationality” No access
      1. Facts of Nature, Form of Life, and Language No access
      2. Language-Games and Rules No access
    4. 2.4 The Context of Rationality No access
    5. 2.5 A Practical-Linguistic Concept of Rationality No access
    1. 3.1 “Explaining” vs. “Understanding”? No access
      1. a. Subject Matter: Two Autonomous Social Practices No access
      2. b. Method: The Dilemma of Accessing “Conceptual Worlds” No access
      3. c. Theory: The Perils of “Craving for Generality” No access
      1. a. Language and the Primacy of Practice: Social Action as Coping No access
      2. b. Pragmatist Methods: Taking the Internal Perspective of Practitioners No access
    4. 3.4 Towards a Synthesis: Theory Must not Go on Holiday No access
  6. Teil II Die Politik der europäischen Krise No access 79 - 80
    1. 4.1 The Functional Dimension of the EU’s Crises No access
    2. 4.2 Whatever Happens, Happens in Multiplicity No access
    3. 4.3 Differentiating Functional Differentiation No access
    4. 4.4 The Interest Paradigm as a Regulative Principle of Integration No access
    5. 4.5 When There Are No Winners, Only Losers: Interest-driven Integration in Times of Crisis No access
    6. 4.6 Conclusion: Rethinking the ‘Motor of Integration’ No access
    1. 5.1 Demokratisierung und Parlamentarisierung in der Geschichte der europäischen Integration No access
    2. 5.2 Vier zentrale Entwicklungen und Konfliktlinien No access
    3. 5.3 Parlamentarisierung als Schlüssel für die Demokratisierung der EU? No access
    1. 6.1 Solidarity: Still a Fundamental Value in the EU? No access
      1. The Case of the Eurozone Crisis No access
      2. The Case of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis No access
      3. Solidarity Lost? No access
      1. Meaning In Use No access
      2. Rule-Following No access
      3. Private Language No access
      1. Towards a Shared Meaning of Solidarity No access
      2. How to Fill the Concept of Solidarity with Life No access
    5. 6.5 Crisis as a Chance to Arrive at a Meaningful Concept of Solidarity No access
    1. 7.1 The Uniting of Europe as a History of Crisis No access
    2. 7.2 The Chance to Understand What Goes Wrong No access
    3. 7.3 The Chance to Identify Underlying Problems No access
    4. 7.4 The Chance to Reflect Upon What Can Be Done No access
    5. 7.5 “There’s Life in the Old Dog Yet!” No access
  11. Teil III Das Recht der europäischen Integration No access 133 - 134
    1. 8.1 Die Politikwissenschaft und die „Integration durch Recht“ No access
    2. 8.2 Frühe Ideen der europäischen Einigung No access
    3. 8.3 Föderalismus und Funktionalismus No access
    4. 8.4 Neofunktionalismus und Intergouvernementalismus No access
    5. 8.5 Mehrebenenansätze und Governance No access
    6. 8.6 Die Annäherung von Rechts- und Politikwissenschaft No access
    1. 9.1 Considering Law in EU Integration No access
    2. 9.2 The “Rational Politics” of Legal Integration No access
    3. 9.3 The Legacy of “Trivial Rationalism” No access
    4. 9.4 The Context of Rationality No access
    5. 9.5 The Context Rationality of European Law No access
    6. 9.6 Interest Is What Contexts Make of It No access
    1. 10.1 European Law: Just Another Political Arena? No access
      1. Functional No access
      2. Local No access
      3. Temporal No access
      1. The Historical Context – the Need for Coherent Adjudication Over Time No access
      2. The Functional Context – Crossing the Dividing-Line Between Law and Politics? No access
      3. The Local Context – Marking Off a Distinct European Legal Order No access
    4. 10.4 “Politics in Robes”? No access
    1. 11.1 Der EuGH: „Politisches Gericht“ oder „Prügelknabe“? No access
    2. 11.2 Als der Gerichtshof zu einem Akteur der Politik erklärt wurde No access
      1. a) Die kontextuelle Bestimmtheit der Rationalität des Rechts No access
      2. b) Auslöser, Konstanz und Kohärenz der Rechtsprechung: Die temporale Dimension No access
      3. c) Die Regeln des Rechts als Grenze zur Politik: Die funktionale Dimension No access
      4. d) Die Konstitution der Rechtsgemeinschaft: Die lokale Dimension No access
    4. 11.4 Warum es eine Kehrtwende in der Integrationsforschung braucht No access
    1. 12.1 Methodischer Kontextualismus und Rechtsintegration No access
      1. Die Akteure des Rechts No access
      2. Rationales Handeln im Recht No access
      3. Der EuGH als Motor der Integration durch Recht? No access
    3. 12.3 Die Integration durch Recht verstehen, heißt den Kontext des europäischen Rechts zu verstehen No access
      1. Lokale Transklusion No access
      2. Funktionale Transklusion No access
      3. Temporale Transklusion No access
      1. Die Vervollständigungstendenz des europäischen Rechts durch lokale Transklusion No access
      2. Die Verlagerung von politischen Fragen auf das Recht durch funktionale Transklusion No access
      3. Die Pfadabhängigkeit der Rechtsprechung durch temporale Transklusion No access
    6. 12.6 Rechtsintegration in einem Multi-Kontext System No access
  17. Teil IV Kontextualismus und Weltgesellschaft No access 243 - 244
    1. 13.1 Weltstaat und Weltgesellschaft No access
    2. 13.2 Staatlichkeit als Zentrum internationaler Verfasstheit? No access
    3. 13.3 Den Fallstricken des methodologischen Nationalismus entgehen No access
    4. 13.4 Demokratische Legitimation und fragmentierte Konstitutionalisierung No access
    5. 13.5 Die Weltgesellschaft als vor-moderne Gesellschaft? No access
    1. 14.1 International Courts as Like-Units? No access
      1. A Global Society of Courts No access
      2. The Exclusive Model: The Rationality of the Legal System No access
      3. The Inclusive Model: The Rationality of Actors in Law No access
      1. Towards a Synthesis: Rationality Under Conditions of Polycontexturality No access
      2. Transclusive and Substitutive Entanglements of Judicial Institutions No access
      1. Let’s ask what constitutes and regulates the judicial process! No access
      2. Constitutive Criteria of Adjudication No access
      3. Regulative Criteria of Adjudication No access
    5. 14.4 The Dividing Line Between Transclusive and Substitutive Entanglements No access
    1. Die kontextuelle Differenz der Integration No access
    2. Differenzierung und Fragmentierung im Recht der Weltgesellschaft No access
    3. Warum sich in der EU das Problem der Fragmentierung nicht stellt No access
    4. Die Integration kontextueller Differenz No access
  21. Literaturverzeichnis No access 289 - 314

Bibliography (518)

  1. Acharya, A. (2016). Regionalism Beyond EU-Centrism. In: T.A. Börzel and T. Risse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 109–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  2. Ackerman, B.A. (1983). Reconstructing American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  3. Ackerman, B.A. (1991). We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  4. Ackerman, B.A. (1998). We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  5. Albert, M. and Mahlert, B. (2017). Weltgesellschaft und Kommunikation: zur Systemtheorie internationaler Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 24(1), 10–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  6. Albert, M. and Schmalz-Bruns, R. (2009). Antinomien der Global Governance: Mehr Weltstaatlichkeit, weniger Demokratie? In: H. Brunkhorst (ed.). Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft, Soziale Welt (pp. 57–74). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  7. Alexy, R. (1983). Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  8. Alexy, R. (1989). A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  9. Alexy, R. (1992). Begriff und Geltung des Rechts. Freiburg: Alber Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  10. Alexy, R. (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  11. Alighieri, D. (1872 [~1316]). Über die Monarchie. Berlin: Heimann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  12. Alter, K.J. (1996). The European Court’s Political Power. West European Politics, 19(3), 458–487. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  13. Alter, K.J. (1998). Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”? European Governments and the Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), 121–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  14. Alter, K.J. (2000). The European Legal System and Domestic Policy: Spillover or Backlash? International Organization, 54(3), 489–518. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  15. Alter, K.J. (2001). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  16. Alter, K.J. (2008). Agents or Trustees? International Courts in their Political Context. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 33–63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  17. Alter, K.J. (2009a). The European Court‘s Political Power Across Time and Space. In: K.J. Alter (ed.), The European Court’s Political Power (pp. 3–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  18. Alter, K.J. (2009b). The European Court and Legal Integration: An Exceptional Story or Harbinger of the Future? In: K.J. Alter (ed.), The European Court’s Political Power (pp. 32–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  19. Alter, K.J. (2009c). Law and Politics in Europe and Beyond. In: K.J. Alter. (ed.), The European Court’s Political Power (pp. 287–303). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  20. Alter, K.J. (2011). The Evolving International Judiciary. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 387–415. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  21. Alter, K.J. (2013). The Multiple Roles of International Courts and Tribunals: Enforcement, Dispute Settlement, Constitutional and Administrative Review. In: J.K. Dunhoff and M.A. Pollack (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (pp. 345–370). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  22. Alter, K.J. (2014). The Multiplication of International Courts. In: C.P.R. Romano, K.J. Alter and Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 63–89). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  23. Alter, K.J. (ed.) (2009). The European Court’s Political Power: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  24. Alter, K.J. and Helfer, L. (2010). Nature or Nuture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice. International O⁠r⁠g⁠a⁠n⁠i⁠z⁠a⁠t⁠i⁠o⁠n⁠, 64(4), 563–592. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  25. Alter, K.J., Helfer, L.R., Madsen, M.R. (2016). How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts. Law and Contemporary Problems, 79(1), 1–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  26. Alvarez, J.E. (2014). What are International Judges for? The Main Functions of International Adjudication. In: C.P.R. Romano, K.J. Alter and Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 158–178). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  27. Amstutz, M. (2013). Métissage: On the Form of Law in World Society. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, 112(2), 336–360. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  28. Amstutz, M. and Karavas, V. (2009). Weltrecht. Ein Derridasches Monster. In: G.-P. Calliess, A. Fischer-Lescano, D. Wielsch and P. Zumbansen (eds.), Festschrift für Gunther Teubner zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 645–672). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  29. Apel, K.-O. (1973). Transformation der Philosophie: Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft, Vol. 2. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  30. Apel, K.-O. (1992). Diskursethik vor der Problematik von Recht und Politik. Können die Rationalitätsdifferenzen zwischen Moralität, Recht und Politik selbst noch durch die Diskursethik normativ-rational gerechtfertigt werden? In: K.-O. Apel and M. Kettner (eds.), Zur Anwendung der Diskursethik in Politik, Recht und Wissenschaft (pp. 29-61). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  31. Armstrong, K.A. (1998). Legal Integration: Theorizing the Legal Dimension of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(2), 155–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  32. Arndt, H.-W. (2004). Europarecht. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  33. Arnull, A. (2006). The European Union and its Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  34. Arnull, A. (2012). Judicial Activism and the Court of Justice: How Should Academics Respond? Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Papers, 2012 (3). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  35. Aust, A. (2009). Kadi – Ignoring International Legal Obligations. International Organizations Law Review, 6(1), 293–298. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  36. Axford, B. and Huggins, R. (2000). Towards a Post-National Polity: The Emergence of the Network Society in Europe. The Sociological Review, 48(S1), 173–206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  37. Azoulai, L. (2008). The Court of Justice and the Social Market Economy: The Emergence of an Ideal and the Conditions for its Realization. Common Market Law Review, 45(5), 1335–1356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  38. Barnard, C. (2008). Viking and Laval – An Introduction. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10, 463–492. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  39. Barnard, C. (2010). Solidarity and the Commission’s “Renewed Social Agenda”. In: M. Ross and Y. Borgmann-Prebil (eds.), Promoting Solidarity in the European Union (pp. 73–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  40. Bauer, M. and Becker, S. (2014). The Unexpected Winner of the Crisis: The European Commission’s Strengthened Role in Economic Governance. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 213–229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  41. Bellers, J. (1710). Some Reasons for an European State. London: [s.n.]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  42. Bengoetxea, J. (1993). The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  43. Bengoetxea, J., MacCormick, N. and Moral Soriano, L. (2001). Integration and Integrity in the Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice. In: G. de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler (eds.), The European Court of Justice (pp. 43–85), Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  44. Berger, M. (2011). Interview (conducted by A. Grimmel), Europäischer Gerichtshof (E⁠u⁠G⁠H), Luxemburg, 05 April 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  45. Bernhard, W.T. and Leblang, D. (2016). Sovereign Debt, Migration Pressure, and Government Survival. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 907–938. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  46. Bernstein, R.J. (2006). The Pragmatic Century. In: S.G. Davaney and W.G. Frisina (eds.), The Pragmatic Century. Conversations with Richard J. Bernstein (pp. 1-14). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  47. Béthune, M. de, Duc de Sully. (1783). Denkwürdigkeiten Maximilian von Bethüne Herzogs von Sülly. Zürich: Orell, Geßner, Füßli. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  48. Beutler, B. (2008). Vom Beruf Europas zur Verfassunggebung. In: R. Wahl (ed.), Verfassungsänderung, Verfassungswandel, Verfassungsinterpretation (pp. 91–103). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  49. Beutler, B. (2011). Die Werte der Europäischen Union und ihr Wert. In: I. Appel, G. Hermes and C. Schönberger (eds.), Öffentliches Recht im offenen Staat (pp. 635–650). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  50. Beutler, B., Bieber, R., Pipkorn, J. and Streil, J. (1987). Die Europäische Gemeinschaft. Rechtsordnung und Politik. 3. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  51. Beutler, B., Bieber, R., Pipkorn, J. and Streil, J. (2001). Die Europäische Union. Rechtsordnung und Politik. 5. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  52. Bix, B. (1992). The Application (and Mis-Application) of Wittgenstein’s Rule-Following Considerations to Legal Theory. In: D. Patterson (ed.), Wittgenstein and Legal Theory (pp. 209–223). Boulder: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  53. Blackburn, S. (2008). Rationality. In: The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online: http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100405395 [accessed March 2017]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  54. Bloor, D. (1983). Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  55. Bloor, D. (1997). Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  56. Bogdandy, A. von and Venzke, I. (2012). In Whose Name? An Investigation of International Courts’ Public Authority and Its Democratic Justification. European Journal of International Law, 23(1), 7–41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  57. Bogdandy, A. von and Venzke, I. (2014). In wessen Namen? Internationale Gerichte in Zeiten globalen Regierens. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  58. Bogdandy, A. von, Kottmann, M., Antpöhler, C., Dickschen, J., Hentrei, S. and Smrkolj, M. (2012). Reverse Solange: Protecting the Essence of Fundamental Rights against EU Member States. Common Market Law Review, 49(2), 489–519. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  59. Bonaparte, N. (1948). In: O. Aubry (ed.). Napoleon als Schriftsteller, Auserwählte Briefe im französischen Originaltext mit einer Einführung in deutscher Sprache. Freudenstadt: Schwarzwald Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  60. Borchardt, K.-D. (1995). Richterrecht durch den Gerichtshof der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. In: A. Randelzhofer, R. Scholz and D. Wilke (eds.), Gedächtnisschrift für Eberhard Grabitz (pp. 29–43). München: C.H. Beck Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  61. Borchardt, K.-D. (2002). Die rechtlichen Grundlagen der Europäischen Union (2. Aufl.). Heidelberg: C.F. Müller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  62. Bracker, S. (2000). Kohärenz und juristische Interpretation. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  63. Brandom, R. (2000). Vocabularies of Pragmatism: Synthesizing Naturalism and Historicism. In: R. Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics (pp. 156-183). Malden, Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  64. Brandom, R. (2008). Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  65. Braun, D. and Tausendpfund, M. (2014). The Impact of the Euro Crisis on Citizens’ Support for the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 231–245. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  66. Bridges, J. (2010). Wittgenstein vs Contextualism. In: A. Ahmed (ed.), Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide (pp. 109–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  67. Brodocz, A. (2006). Die Macht der Judikative. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  68. Brogaard, B. (2008). Moral Contextualism and Moral Relativism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 58(232), 385–409. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  69. Brown, G.S. (1972). Laws of Form. New York: Julian Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  70. Bücker, A. (2008). Die Rosella‐Entscheidung des E⁠u⁠G⁠H zu gewerkschaftlichen Maßnahmen gegen Standortverlagerungen – Der Vorhang zu und viele Fragen offen. Neue Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht, 55, 212–215. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  71. Bull, H. (1977 [2012]). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  72. Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W. (1993). Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration. International Organization, 47(1), 41–76. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  73. Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W. (1998). Revisiting the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), 177–209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  74. Burton, J. W. (1972). World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  75. Cannizzaro, E. (2010). Security Council Resolutions and EC Fundamental Rights. Some Remarks on the ECJ Decision in the Kadi Case. Yearbook of European Law 2009, 28(1), 593–600. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  76. Caporaso, J.A. and Tarrow, S. (2009). Polanyi in Brussels: Supranational Institutions and the Transnational Embedding of Markets. International Organization, 63(4), 593–620. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  77. Cappelletti, M., Seccombe, M. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.) (1985). Integration Through Law. Europe and the American Federal Experience. Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  78. Carrubba, C.J. and Gabel, M. (2015). International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements: A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  79. Carrubba, C.J., Gabel and M., Hankla, C. (2008). Judicial Behavior under Political Constraint. Evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 435–452. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  80. Cichowski, R.A. (2007). The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  81. Cohen, A. (2007). Constitutionalism without Constitution: Transnational Elites between Political Mobilization and Legal Expertise in the Making of a Constitution for Europe (1940s-1960s). Law & Social Inquiry, 31(1), 109–135. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  82. Cohen, A. and Vauchez, A. (2007). Introduction: Law, Lawyers, and Transnational Politics in the Production of Europe. Law & Social Inquiry, 32(1), 75–82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  83. Cohen, A. and Vauchez, A. (2008). Back to the „Future of Europe“: A Political Sociology of EU Constitutional Saga. EUI Working Papers, 33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  84. Cohen, A. and Vauchez, A. (2011). The Social Construction of Law: The European Court of Justice and its Legal Revolution Revisited. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 7, 417–431. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  85. Cohen, S. (1987). Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards. Synthese, 73(1), 3–26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  86. Cohn-Bendit, D. and Verhofstadt, G. (2012). For Europe – Manifesto for a Postnational Revolution in Europe. München: Hanser. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  87. Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  88. Conant, L. (2002). Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  89. Conant, L. (2007). Review Article: The Politics of Legal Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1), 45–66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  90. Coomann, H. (1983). Die Kohärenztheorie der Wahrheit. Eine kritische Darstellung der Theorie Reschers vor ihrem historischen Hintergrund. Frankfurt a.M.: Verlag Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  91. Corbey, D. (1995). Dialectical Functionalism. Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration. International Organization, 49(2), 253–284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  92. Craig, P. (2015). The Financial Crisis, the European Union Institutional Order, and Constitutional Responsibility. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 22(2), 243–267. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  93. Curtin, D. and Eckes, C. (2008). The Kadi Case: Mapping the Boundaries between the Executive and the Judiciary in Europe. International Organizations Law Review, 5(2), 365–369. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  94. d’Aspremont, J. and Dopagne, F. (2008). Kadi: The ECJ’s Reminder of the Elementary Divide between Legal Orders. International Organizations Law Review, 5(2), 371–379. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  95. Däubler, W. (2008). Gestaltungsspielräume aus deutscher Sicht. Die Auswirkungen der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs auf das Arbeitsrecht der Mitgliedstaaten. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, BMAS-Symposium (26 June 2008). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  96. Davidson, D. (2004). Problems of Rationality: Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  97. Davies, B. and Rasmussen, M. (2012). Towards a New History of European Law. Contemporary European History, 21(3), 305–318. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  98. de Búrca, G. (2005). Rethinking Law in Neofunctionalist Theory. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 310–326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  99. de Búrca, G. and Weiler, J.H.H. (eds.) (2012). The Worlds of European Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  100. de Witte, B., Muir, E. and Dawson, M. (eds.) (2013). Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice: Causes, Responses and Solutions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  101. Dehousse, R. (2000). L’Europe par le Droit. Plaidoyer pour une Approche Contextuelle. Politique européenne, 1(1), 63–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  102. Dehousse, R. (2002). Law, Political Science and EU Legal Studies. An Interdisciplinary Project? Law as Politics. European Union Politics, 3(1), 113–136. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  103. DeRose, K. (2009). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context. Oxford: Calendron Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  104. Dewey, J. (1980). Democracy and Education. (John Dewey. The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Vol. 9), ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  105. Dewey, J. (1981 [1925]). Experience and Nature. In: J.A. Boydston (ed.), John Dewey, The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 1. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  106. Dewey, J. (1991 [1938]). Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. In: J.A. Boydston (ed.), John Dewey, The Later Works, 1925–1953, Vol. 12. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  107. Diamond, C. (1991). The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  108. Diez, T. (1996). Postmoderne und europäische Integration. Die Dominanz des Staatsmodells, die Verantwortung gegenüber dem Anderen und die Konstruktion eines alternativen Horizonts. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 3(2), 255–281. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  109. Dobler, P. (2008). Legitimation und Grenzen der Rechtsfortbildung durch den E⁠u⁠G⁠H. In: G. H. Roth and P. Hilpold (eds.), Der E⁠u⁠G⁠H und die Souveränität der Mitgliedstaaten: Eine kritische Analyse richterlicher Rechtsschöpfung auf ausgewählten Rechtsgebieten (pp. 509–560). Wien: Linde. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  110. Draper, P. (2012). Breaking Free from Europe: Why Africa Needs Another Model of Regional Integration. The International Spectator, 47(1), 67–82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  111. Dubois, P. (1891 [1306]). De recuperatione Terrae Sanctae. Paris: A. Picard. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  112. Duchêne, F. (1994). Jean Monnet: The First Statesman of Interdependence. New York: Norton. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  113. Dupuy, P.-M. and Viñuales, J.E. (2014). The Challenge of ‘Proliferation’: An Anatomy of the Debate. In: C.P.R. Romano, K.J. Alter and Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 135-157). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  114. Durkheim, E. (1895). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Alcan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  115. Ehrenzeller, B, Gomez, P., Grewe, C., Häberle, P., Kley, A., Kotzur, M., Odendahl, K., Schindler, B. and Thürer, D. (eds.) (2017). Staatsverständnisse – ein interdisziplinärer Gedankenaustausch. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  116. Elsig, M. and Pollack, M.A. (2014). Agents, Trustees, and International Courts: The Politics of Judicial Appointment at the World Trade Organization. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 391–415. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  117. Elster, J. (2009). Interpretation and Rational Choice. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 5–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  118. Eriksen, E.O. and Fossum, J.E. (2012). Representation through Deliberation: The European Case. Constellations, 19(2), 325–339. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  119. Eriksen, E.O. (2009). The Unfinished Democratization of Europe. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  120. Eriksen, E.O. (2014). The Normativity of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  121. Ernst, G. (2005). Radikaler Kontextualismus. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 59(2), 159–178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  122. Ernst, W. (2007). Gelehrtes Recht: Die Jurisprudenz aus der Sicht des Zivilrechtslehrers. In: C. Engel and W. Schön (eds.), Das Proprium der Rechtswissenschaft (pp. 3–49). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  123. Esmark, A. (2011). Systems Theory. In: M. Bevir (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Governance (pp. 91–106). London: Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  124. European Commission (2014). Why Did the Crisis Spread? Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/explained/the_financial_and_economic_crisis/why_did_the_crisis_spread/index_en.htm [accessed August 2016]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  125. Everson, M. (2010). Is the European Court of Justice a legal or political institution now? Increasingly controversial rulings threaten to further erode the credibility of an institution founded on noble principles. guardian.co.uk, 10.8.2010. Available online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2010/aug/10/european-court-justice-legal-political [accessed April 2017]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  126. Fabbrini, S. (2013). Intergovernmentalism and Its Limits. Assessing the European Union’s Answer to the Euro Crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1003–1029. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  127. Fastenrath, U. (2009). Prügelknabe E⁠u⁠G⁠H. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 4.6.2009, p. 8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  128. Fioramonti, L. (2012). Conclusion – Building Regions from Below: Has the Time Come for Regionalism 2.0? The International Spectator, 47(1), 151–160. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  129. Fischer, J. (2000). Vom Staatenverbund zur Föderation – Gedanken über die Finalität der europäischen Integration. Berlin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  130. Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. (2004). Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 999–1046. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  131. Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. (2006). Regime-¬Kollisionen: Zur Fragmentierung des globalen Rechts. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  132. Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. (2007). Fragmentierung des Weltrechts: Vernetzung globaler Regimes statt etatistischer Rechtseinheit. In: M. Albert and R. Stichweh (eds.), Weltstaat – Weltstaatlichkeit: Politische Strukturbildung nach der Globalisierung (pp. 37–61). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  133. Fischer-Lescano, A. and Viellechner, L. (2010). Globaler Rechtspluralismus. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 34–35/2010, 20–26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  134. Fligstein, N. and Stone Sweet, A. (2002). Constructing Polities and Markets, An Institutionalist Account of European Integration. American Journal of Sociology, 107(5), 1206–1043. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  135. Foerster, H. von (1984). Disorder/Order: Discovery or Invention. In: P. Livingston (ed.), Disorder and Order: Proceedings of the Stanford International Symposium (Sept. 14-16, 1981) (pp. 177-189). Saratoga: Anma Libri. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  136. Foerster, H. von (1991). Through the Eyes of the Other. In: F. Steyer (ed.), Research and Reflexivity (pp. 21–28). London: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  137. Foerster, H. von (2003). Perception of the Future and the Future of Perception. In: H. von Foerster (ed.), Understanding Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and C⁠o⁠g⁠n⁠i-t⁠i⁠o⁠n (pp. 199–210). New York: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  138. Foerster, R.H. (1967). Europa: Geschichte einer politischen Idee. München: Nymphenburger Verlags-Handlung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  139. Foerster, R.H. (ed.) (1963). Die Idee Europa 1300–1946, Quellen zur Geschichte der politischen Einigung. München: Dt. Taschenbuch-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  140. Follesdal, A. and Hix, S. (2006). Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  141. Forst, R. and Günther, K. (eds.) (2011). Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  142. Fossum, J.E. (2005). Contemporary European Constitution-¬Making. Constrained or Reflexive? In: E.O. Eriksen (ed.), Making the European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the EU. Routledge Studies on Democratising Europe (pp. 143–166). New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  143. Franck, S.D. (2009). Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration. Harvard International Law Journal, 50(2), 435–489. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  144. Friedrich, C.J. (1964). Nationaler und internationaler Föderalismus in Theorie und Praxis. Politische Vierteljahresschrift (PVS), 5(2), 154–187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  145. Friedrich, C.J. (1968). Trends in Federalism in Theory and Practice. New York: Praeger. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  146. Friedrich, C.J. (1972). Europa: Nation im Werden? Bonn: Europa Union Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  147. Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and Method. New York: Crossroad. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  148. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method. 2., rev. ed. London: Continuum. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  149. Garrett, G. (1992). International Cooperation and Institutional Choice: the European Community’s Internal Market. International Organization, 46(2), 533–560. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  150. Garrett, G. (1995). The Politics of Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization, 49(1), 171–181. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  151. Garrett, G., Kelemen, D.R. and Schulz, H. (1998). The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union. International Organization, 52(1), 149–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  152. Genova, J. (1995). Wittgenstein: A Way of Seeing. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  153. Ginsburg, T. (2014). Political Constraints on International Courts. In: C.P.R. Romano, K.J. Alter and Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 483–502). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  154. Glock, H.-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  155. Glock, H.-J. (2000). Wittgenstein Lexikon. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  156. Goodman, R.B. (2002). Wittgenstein and William James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  157. Granger, M.-P. (2006). States as Successful Litigants before the European Court of Justice. Lessons from the ‘Repeat Players’ of European Litigation. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2, 27–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  158. Grayling, A.C. (2004). Wittgenstein. Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  159. Grimmel, A. (2010a). Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism? The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice. Center for European Studies Working Paper Series, 176, Harvard University. Available online: https://ces.fas.harvard.edu/uploads/files/Working-Papers-Archives/CES_176.pdf [accessed Mai 2017] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  160. Grimmel, A. (2010b). Where the River Meets the Sea. Wittgenstein and the Context of Rationality. SSRN Working Paper. https://www.ssrn.com (not available online anymore). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  161. Grimmel, A. (2011a). Integration and the Context of Law. Why the European Court of Justice is not a Political Actor. Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po, 2011(3), Sciences Po, Paris. Available online: https://www.sciencespo.fr/centre-etudes-europeennes/sites/sciencespo.fr.centre-etudes-europeennes/files/03_2011%20integration-and-the-context-of-law-why-the-european-court-o.pdf [accessed July 2017] Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  162. Grimmel, A. (2011b). Die Transformation des Rationalitätsbegriffs in Wittgensteins Philosophie der Sprache. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 65(3), 301–322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  163. Grimmel, A. (2012a). Judicial Interpretation or Judicial Activism? The Legacy of Rationalism in the Studies of the European Court of Justice. European Law Journal, 18(4), 518–535. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  164. Grimmel, A. (2012b). Der Kontext als Schlüssel für ein angemessenes Verständnis der Integration durch Recht in Europa – am Beispiel der aktuellen Grundrechtsrechtsprechung des E⁠u⁠G⁠H. Europarecht, 48(2), 146–169. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  165. Grimmel, A. (2013a). Europäische Integration im Kontext des Rechts. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  166. Grimmel, A. (2013b). Der Kontext des europäischen Rechts als Schlüssel für ein interdisziplinäres Verständnis der „Integration durch Recht“ im Rahmen einer integrierten Europawissenschaft am Beispiel der aktuellen Grundrechtsrechtsprechung des E⁠u⁠G⁠H. Europarecht, 2/2013, 146–169. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  167. Grimmel, A. (2014a). The Uniting of Europe by Transclusion: Understanding the Contextual Conditions of Integration Through Law. Journal of European Integration, 36(6), 549–566. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  168. Grimmel, A. (2014b). Das „funktionale Demokratiedefizit“ der EU als Defizit politischer Gestaltung. Wirtschaftsdienst, 94(4), 239–257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  169. Grimmel, A. (2014c). This is not Life as it is Lived Here: The European Court of Justice and the Myth of Judicial Activism. European Journal of Legal Studies, 7(2), 61–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  170. Grimmel, A. (2015). Wittgenstein and the Context of Rationality: Towards a Language Practical Notion of Rational Reason and Action. Journal of Language and Politics (JLP), 14(5), 712–728. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  171. Grimmel, A. (ed.) (2018). The Crisis of the European Union – Challenges, Analyses, Solutions. Abingdon, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  172. Grimmel, A. and Giang, S.M. (eds.) (2017). Solidarity in the European Union: A Fundamental Value in Crisis. Heidelberg: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  173. Grimmel, A. and Jakobeit, C. (2014). Die integrationstheoretischen Grundlagen des Europarechts. In: A. Hatje and P.-C. Müller-Graff (eds.), Europäisches Organisations- und Verfassungsrecht: Enzyklopädie Europarecht (pp. 89–111). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  174. Grimmel, A. and Jakobeit, C. (eds.) (2009). Politische Theorien der europäischen Integration. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  175. Grimmel, A. and Rüland, J. (2015). Regionale Integration als Gegenstand politikwissenschaftlicher Theorien und Erklärungsansätze. In: A. Grimmel and C. Jakobeit (eds.), Regionale Integration – Erklärungsansätze und Analysen zu den wichtigsten Integrationszusammenschlüssen in der Welt (pp. 19–53). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  176. Gunnell, J.G. (2011). Political Theory and Social Science: Cutting Against the Grain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  177. Gunnell, J.G. (2012). Leaving Everything as It Is: Political Inquiry After Wittgenstein. Contemporary Political Theory, 12(2), 80–101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  178. Gunnell, J.G. (2014). Social Inquiry After Wittgenstein and Kuhn: Leaving Everything as It Is. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  179. Gunnell, J.G. (2016). Social Inquiry and the Pursuit of Reality: Cora Diamond and the Problem of Criticizing from “Outside”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(6), 584–603. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  180. Günther, G. (1979). Life as Poly-Contexturality. In: G. Günther (ed.), Beiträge zur Grundlegung einer operationsfähigen Dialektik, Vol. 2 (pp. 283–306). Hamburg: Meiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  181. Guzman, A.T. (2008). How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  182. Haas, E.B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  183. Haas, E.B. (1961). International Integration: the European and the Universal Process. International Organization, 15(3), 366–392. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  184. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. (Vol. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung, Vol. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  185. Habermas, J. (1984). Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  186. Habermas, J. (1997). Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  187. Habermas, J. (2007). Kommunikative Rationalität und grenzüberschreitende Politik: eine Replik. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth (eds.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit (pp. 406–459). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  188. Habermas, J. (2011). Zur Verfassung Europas. Ein Essay. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  189. Habermas, J. (2012). The Crisis of the European Union in Light of a Constitutionalization of International Law: An Essay on the Constitution for Europe. In: J. Habermas (ed.), The Crisis of the European Union: A Response (pp. 1–70). Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  190. Häberle, P. and Kotzur, M. (2016). Europäische Verfassungslehre. Nomos: Baden-Baden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  191. Hallstein, W. (1973). Die Europäische Gemeinschaft. Düsseldorf: Econ. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  192. Hallstein, W. (1979a). Die EWG als Schritt zur Europäischen Einheit, Rede, gehalten auf dem Kongress Europäischer Föderalisten, Wiesbaden (9. Januar 1959). In: T. Oppermann (ed.), Walter Hallstein – Europäische Reden (pp. 103–122). Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  193. Hallstein, W. (1979b). Die EWG – Eine Rechtsgemeinschaft, Rede anlässlich der Ehrenpromotion an der Universität Padua (12. März 1962). In: T. Oppermann (ed.), Walter Hallstein – Europäische Reden (pp. 341–348). Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  194. Hallstein, W. (1979c). Die echten Probleme der europäischen Integration, Rede, gehalten am Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel (19. Februar 1965). In: T. Oppermann (ed.), Walter Hallstein – Europäische Reden (pp. 523–524). Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  195. Hammerstein, N. (ed.) (1995). Staatslehre der frühen Neuzeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Dt. Klassiker-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  196. Harpaz, G. (2009). Judicial Review by the European Court of Justice of UN ‘Smart Sanctions’ Against Terror in the Kadi Dispute. European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(1), 65–88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  197. Hart, H.L.A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  198. Haughton, T. (2016). Is Crisis the New Normal? The European Union in 2015. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(S1), 5–7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  199. Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Calendron Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  200. Heisenberg, D. and Richmond, A. (2002). Supranational Institution-Building in the European Union: a Comparison of the European Court of Justice and the European Central Bank. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 201–218. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  201. Helfer, L.R. (2006). Why States Create International Tribunals: A Theory of Constrained Independence. Conferences on New Political Economy, 23(1), 253–276. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  202. Helfer, L.R. and Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo. California Law Review, 93(1), 899–956. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  203. Helfer, L.R. and Voeten, E. (2014). International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe. International Organization, 68(1), 77–110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  204. Hellmann, G. (2016). Foreign Policy: Concept, Vocabulary and Practice. In: G. Hellmann, A. Fahrmeir and M. Vec (eds.), The Transformation of Foreign Policy: Drawing and Managing Boundaries from Antiquity to the Present (pp. 30-50). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  205. Herzog, R. and Gerken, L. (2007). Europa entmachtet uns und unsere Vertreter. Welt am Sonntag, 14.2.2007, p. 8–9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  206. Herzog, R. and Gerken, L. (2008). Stoppt den Europäischen Gerichtshof. Die Kompetenzen der Mitgliedstaaten werden ausgehöhlt. Die immer fragwürdigeren Urteile aus Luxemburg verlangen nach einer gerichtlichen Kontrollinstanz. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 8.9.2008, p. 8. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  207. Hettne, B. and Ponjaert, F. (2014). Interregionalism and World Order: The Diverging EU and US Models. In: M. Telò (ed.), European Union and New Regionalism (pp. 115–138). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  208. Heyes, C.J. (ed.) (2003). The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  209. Hinojosa Martínez, L. M. (2008). Bad Law for Good Reasons. The Contradictions of the Kadi Judgment. International Organizations Law Review, 5(2), 339–357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  210. Hobbes, T. (1742). Elementa philosophica de cive. Amsterdam: Boom. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  211. Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  212. Hoffmann, S. (1995). The European Sisyphus – Essays on Europe 1964–1994. Boulder: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  213. Hollis, M. (1977). Models of Man: Philosophical Thoughts on Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  214. Hollis, M. (1991). Rationalität und soziales Verstehen: Wittgenstein-Vorlesungen der Universität Bayreuth. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  215. Hollis, M. (1996). Reason in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  216. Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  217. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  218. Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1), 171–200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  219. Hopf, T. (2010). The Logic of Habit in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 16(4), 539–561. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  220. Höpner, M. (2008a). Usurpation statt Delegation: Wie der E⁠u⁠G⁠H die Binnenmarktintegration radikalisiert und warum er politischer Kontrolle bedarf. MPIfG Discussion Paper, 2008(12). Köln: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  221. Höpner, M. (2008b). Das soziale Europa findet nicht statt. Mitbestimmung, 2008(5), 46–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  222. Höpner, M. (2009). Kein soziales Defizit. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (ed.), Der E⁠u⁠G⁠H und das soziale Europa. Für eine Aufwertung sozialer Grundrechte im EU-Rechtssystem, Internationale Politikanalyse. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  223. Höpner, M. (2010). Warum betreibt der Europäische Gerichtshof Rechtsfortbildung? Die Politisierungshypothese. MPIfG Working Paper, 2010(2). Köln: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  224. Höreth, M. (2008). Die Selbstautorisierung des Agenten. Der Europäische Gerichtshof im Vergleich zum U.S. Supreme Court. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  225. Hugo, V. (1867). Paris. Introduction au livre „Paris-guide“. Paris: Librairie international. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  226. Hunt, J. (2007). The End of Judicial Constitutionalization. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 3, 135-155. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  227. Hutchinson, P., Read, R. and Sharrock, W. (2008). There is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. Aldershot: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  228. Inotai, E., Segeš Frelak, J. and Schmidt, H.J. (2015). Die Visegrád-Staaten und die europäische Flüchtlingspolitik. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 47–48/2015, 38–46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  229. Ioannou, D., Leblond, P. and Niemann, A. (2015). European Integration and the Crisis. Practice and Theory. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 155–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  230. Isiksel, N.T. (2010). Fundamental Rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat. European Law Journal, 16(5), 551–577. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  231. Jahn, J. (2008). Europarichter überziehen ihre Kompetenzen. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 25, 1788–1789. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  232. Jakobeit, C. (2015). Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with Sub-Saharan Africa. In: M. Telo, L. Fawcett, and F. Ponjaert (eds.). Interregionalism and the European Union: A Post-Revisionist Approach to Europe’s Place in a Changing World (pp. 127–139). Farnham: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  233. Jakobeit, C. and Yenal, A. (1993). Gesamteuropa. Analysen, Probleme und Entwicklungsperspektiven. Opladen: Leske + Budrich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  234. Jakobeit, C., Kappel, R. and Mückenberger, U. (2010). Zivilisierung der Weltordnung: Normbildung durch transnationale Netzwerke. Leviathan, 38(3), 411–427. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  235. Jakobeit, C., Müller, F., Sondermann, E., Nehr, I. and Ziai, A. (2014). Einleitung: Entwicklungstheorien – weltgesellschaftliche Transformationen, entwicklungspolitische Herausforderungen, theoretische Innovationen. In: idem (eds.), Entwicklungstheorien: Weltgesellschaftliche Transformationen, entwicklungspolitische Herausforderungen, theoretische Innovationen (pp. 5–40), PVS Sonderheft 48, Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  236. James, W. (1948 [1896]). The Will to Believe. In: Essay in Pragmatism, ed. with an Introduction by Alburey Castell (pp. 88-109). New York: Haffner Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  237. James, W. (1995 [1907]). Pragmatism. New York: Dover Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  238. Joas, H. 1992a. Pragmatismus und Gesellschaftstheorie. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  239. Joas, H. 1992b. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  240. Joerges, C. (2006). “Deliberative Political Processes” Revisited: What Have We Learnt about the Legitimacy of Supranational Decision-Making. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 779–802. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  241. Joerges, C. (2009). Bemerkungen zu dem Gutachten von Franz C. Mayer. In: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (ed.), Der E⁠u⁠G⁠H und das soziale Europa. Für eine Aufwertung sozialer Grundrechte im EU-Rechtssystem, Internationale Politikanalyse, 35–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  242. Joerges, C. (2011). A New Type of Conflicts Law as the Legal Paradigm of the Postnational Constellation. In: C. Joerges and J. Falke (eds.), Karl Polanyi, Globalisation and the Potential of Law in Transnational Markets (pp. 465–501). Oxford: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  243. Joerges, C. and Rödl, F. (2009). Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the ‘Social Deficit’ of European Integration. Reflections after the Judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval. European Law Journal, 15(1), 1–19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  244. Johnston, A.I. (2005). Conclusions and Extensions. Toward Mid-Range Theorizing and Beyond Europe. International Organization, 59(4), 1013–1044. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  245. Jones, E., Kelemen, D. and Meunier, S. (2016). Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010–1034. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  246. Josselin, J.-M. and Marciano, A. (2007). How the Court Made a Federation of the EU. The Review of International Organizations, 2(1), 59–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  247. Juncker, J.C. (2015). State of the Union 2015: Time for Honesty, Unity and Solidarity. Strasbourg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  248. Juncker, J.C. (2016). State of the Union 2016: Extracts from the Opening Statements. Strasbourg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  249. Kaelble, H. (2013). Spirale nach unten oder produktive Krisen? Zur Geschichte politischer Entscheidungskrisen der europäischen Integration. Integration, 36(3), 169–182. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  250. Kamkhaji, J.C. and Radaelli, C.M. (2017). Crisis, Learning and Policy Change in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 714-734. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  251. Kant, I. (1968 [1784]). Kants Werke, Abhandlungen nach 1781, Akademie Textausgabe, Band 8. Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  252. Kant, I. (1968 [1795]). Zum ewigen Frieden. Ein philosophischer Entwurf. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  253. Kelemen, R.D. (2001). The Limits of Judicial Power: Trade-Environment Disputes in the GATT/WTO and the EU. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 622–650. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  254. Kelemen, R.D. (2011). The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in the European Union. Paper prepared for presentation at the European Union Studies Association Biennial Convention. Boston, MA. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  255. Kelemen, R.D. (2012). The Political Foundations of Judicial Independence in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 43-58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  256. Kelemen, R.D. and Schmidt, S.K. (2012). Introduction – The European Court of Justice and Legal Integration: Perpetual Momentum? Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 1–7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  257. Kenney, S.J. (2000). Beyond Principles and Agents. Seeing Courts as Organizations by Comparing Référendaires at the European Court and Law Clerks at the U.S. Supreme Court. Comparative Political Studies, 33(5), 593–625. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  258. Keohane, R.O., Moravcsik, A. and Slaughter, A.-M. (2000). Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational. International Organization, 54(3), 457–488. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  259. Kilroy, B.A. (1999). Integration through the Law. Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  260. Kincaid, H. (2004). Contextualism, Explanation and the Social Sciences. Philosophical Explorations, 7(3), 201–218. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  261. Kingsbury, B. (2012). International Courts: Uneven Judicialization in Global Order. In: J. Crawford and M. Koskenniemi (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to International Law (pp. 203–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  262. Kjaer, P.F. (2018). The EU’s Model of Regional Integration in a Functionally Differentiated World Society. In: A. Grimmel (ed.), The Crisis of the European Union: Challenges, Analyses, Solutions (pp. 215–225). Abingdon, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  263. Kocher, E. (2009). Das „Soziale“ in der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs. In: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (ed.), Der E⁠u⁠G⁠H und das soziale Europa. Für eine Aufwertung sozialer Grundrechte im EU-Rechtssystem, Internationale Politikanalyse (pp. 38–41). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  264. Kokott, J. (2011). Interview (conducted by A. Grimmel), Europäischer Gerichtshof (E⁠u⁠G⁠H), Luxemburg, 12 April 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  265. Komarek, J. (2009). Precedent and Judicial Lawmaking in Supreme Courts. The Court of Justice Compared to the US Supreme Court and the French Cour de Cassation. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 11, 399–433. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  266. Koskenniemi, M. and Leino, P. (2002). Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law, 15(3), 553–579. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  267. Koskenniemi, M. (2011). The Politics of International Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  268. Kotzur, M. (2008). Soziales Völkerrecht für eine solidarische Völkergemeinschaft? Juristenzeitung, 6/2008, 265–272. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  269. Kotzur, M. (2015). „Verstehen durch Hinzudenken“ und/oder „Ausweitung der Kampfzone“. In: S. Baer, O. Lepsius, C. Schönberger, C. Waldhoff and C. Walter (eds.), Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart (pp. 355–365). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  270. Kotzur, M. (2016). Die Internationalisierung des europäischen Verwaltungsrechts durch die Unionsgerichtsbarkeit. Europarecht, Beiheft 1 (2016), 105–118. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  271. Kratochwil, F.V. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. The Cambridge Law Journal, 48(3), 527–529. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  272. Krause, D. (2005). Luhmann-Lexikon, 4. Aufl. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius (UTB). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  273. Krause, K.C.F. (1920 [1814]). Entwurf eines europäischen Staatenbundes als Basis des allgemeinen Friedens und als rechtliches Mittel gegen jeden Angriff wider die innere und äußere Freiheit Europas. Leipzig: Meiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  274. Kripke, S.A. (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  275. Kumm, M. (2013). The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 605–628. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  276. Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). New York: Verso. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  277. Laffan, B. (2014). The State of Our Unsettled Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 12(4), 853–863. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  278. Lange, S. (2002). Die politische Utopie der Gesellschaftssteuerung. In: K.-U. Hellmann and R. Schmalz-Bruns (eds.), Theorie der Politik: Niklas Luhmanns politische Soziologie (pp. 171–193). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  279. Lavranos, N. (2010). Protecting European Law from International Law. European Foreign Affairs Review, 15(1), 265–282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  280. Le Goff, J. (2007). Die Geburt Europas im Mittelalter. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  281. Leibfried, S. and Zürn, M. (eds.) (2006). Transformationen des Staates? Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  282. Leibniz, G.W. (1995 [1670]). Bedencken, Welcher gestalt Securitas publica interna et externa und Status praesens im Reich iezigen Umbständen nach auf festen Fuß zu stellen. In: N. Hammerstein (ed.), Staatslehre der frühen Neuzeit (pp. 935–1009). Frankfurt a.M.: Dt. Klassiker-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  283. Lenaerts, K. and Van Nuffield, P. (2003). Europees recht in hoofdlijnen. Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Maklu. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  284. Lenk, H. (1967). Zu Wittgensteins Theorie der Sprachspiele. In: M. v. Baum, B. Dörflinger and H. Klemme (eds.), Kant-Studien, Bd. 58 (458–480). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  285. Lindberg, L.N. (1963). The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  286. Lindberg, L.N. (1965). Decision Making and Integration in the European Community. International Organization, 19(1), 56–73. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  287. Lindberg, L.N. and Scheingold, S.A. (1970). Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  288. Lindstrom, N. (2010). Service Liberalization in the Enlarged EU. A Race to the Bottom or the Emergence of Transnational Political Conflict? Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1307–1327. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  289. Livingston, P. (ed.) (1984). Disorder and Order: Proceedings of the Stanford International Symposium (Sept. 14-16, 1981). Saratoga: Anma Libri. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  290. Lohse, S. (2016). Pragmatism, Ontology, and Philosophy of the Social Sciences in Practice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 47(1), 3–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  291. Luhmann, N. (1981). Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat. München: Olzog. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  292. Luhmann, N. (1982). The World Society as a Social System. International Journal of General Systems, 8(3), 131–138. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  293. Luhmann, N. (1990). Die Stellung der Gerichte im Rechtssystem. Rechtstheorie, 21(4), 459–473. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  294. Luhmann, N. (1995a). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  295. Luhmann, N. (1995b). Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  296. Luhmann, N. (1997). Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society? International Review of Sociology, 7(1), 67–79. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  297. Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. (Vol. 1 and 2). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  298. Luhmann, N. (2000). Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  299. Luhmann, N. (2002). Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  300. Luhmann, N. (2004). Law as a Social System. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  301. Luhmann, N. (2012). Theory of Society. (Vol. 1 and 2). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  302. Malcolm, N. (1968). Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. In: G. Pitcher (ed.), Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations (pp. 65–103). London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  303. Malecki, M. (2012). Do ECJ Judges All Speak with the Same Voice? Evidence of Divergent Preferences from the Judgments of Chambers. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 59–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  304. Mancini, G.F. (1989). The Making of a Constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review, 26(4), 595– 614. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  305. Mancini, G.F. and Keeling, D.T. (1994). Democracy and the European Court of Justice. Modern Law Review, 57(2), 175–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  306. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (2008). The Logic of Appropriateness. In: M. Moran, M. Rein and R.E. Goodin (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  307. Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996). European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341-378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  308. Masing, J. (1997). Die Mobilisierung des Bürgers für die Durchsetzung des Rechts: Europäische Impulse für eine Revision der Lehre vom subjektiv-öffentlichen Recht (Schriften zum Öffentlichen Recht, Band 716). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  309. Mattli, W. and Slaughter, A.-M. (1995). Law and Politics in the European Union: A Reply to Garrett. International Organization, 49(1), 183–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  310. Mattli, W. and Slaughter, A.-M. (1998). The Role of National Courts in the Process of European Integration: Accounting for Judicial Preferences and Constraints. In: A.-M. Slaughter, A. Stone Sweet and J.H.H. Weiler (eds.), The European Courts and National Courts (pp. 253–267). Oxford: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  311. Mazzini, G. (1911). In: S. Flesch (ed.), Guiseppe Mazzini. Politische Schriften. Leipzig: Reichenbach’sche Verlagsbuchhaltung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  312. McCormick, J. (1996). The European Union: Politics and Policies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  313. McCown, M. (2003). The European Parliament Before the Bench: ECJ Precedent and EP Litigation Strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(6), 974–995. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  314. Menz, S. and Scholz, T. B. (2009). The Kadi-Case or the Legal Protection of Persons Included in the European Union “Anti-terror List”. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 17(1), 61–68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  315. Merkel, W., Puhle, H.-J., Croissant, A., Eicher, C., Thiery, P. (2003). Defekte Demokratie: Theorie (Vol. 1). Opladen: Leske und Budrich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  316. Mitrany, D. (1965). The Prospect of Integration: Federal or Functional. Journal of Common Market Studies, 4(2), 119–149. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  317. Mitrany, D. (1966). A Working Peace System. Chicago: Quadrangle Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  318. Mitrany, D. (1975). The Functional Theory of Politics. London: Martin Robertson. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  319. Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  320. Moravcsik, A. (1995). Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration. A Rejoinder. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(4), 611–628. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  321. Moravcsik, A. (2002). In Defence of the „Democratic Deficit“: Reassessing the Legitimacy of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 603–634. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  322. Moravcsik, A. (2008). The European Constitutional Settlement. The World Economy, 31(1), 158–183. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  323. Münch, R. (2008). Constructing a European Society by Jurisdiction. European Law Journal, 14(5), 519–541. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  324. Murphy, S.D. (2014). International Judicial Bodies for Resolving Disputes Between States. In: C.P.R. Romano, K.J. Alter and Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 181–204). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  325. Neumann, U. (2005). Wahrheit statt Autorität. Möglichkeit und Grenzen einer Legitimation durch Begründung im Recht. In: K. D. Lerch (ed.). Recht verhandeln: Argumentieren, Begründen und Entscheiden im Diskurs des Rechts (pp. 369–384). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  326. Neves, M. (2009). Transversale Verfassungen? Konstitutionalismus: Vom Staat zur Weltgesellschaft. In: H. Brunkhorst (ed.), Demokratie in der Weltgesellschaft, Soziale Welt Sonderband 18 (pp. 75–98). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  327. Neves, M. (2013). Transconstitutionalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  328. Nicolaysen, G. (2002). Europa als Rechtsgemeinschaft. In: W. Weidenfeld (ed.), Europa Handbuch (pp. 862–873). Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  329. Nietzsche, F. (1886). Jenseits von Gut und Böse. Vorspiel einer Philosophie der Zukunft. Leipzig: C. G. Naumann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  330. Novitz, T. (2008). A Human Rights Analysis of the Viking and Laval Judgments. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10, 541–561. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  331. Ó Caoimh, A. (2011). Interview (conducted by A. Grimmel), Europäischer Gerichtshof (E⁠u⁠G⁠H), Luxemburg, 12 April 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  332. Onuf, N.G. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Colombia: University of South Carolina Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  333. Oppermann, T. (ed.) (1979). Walter Hallstein – Europäische Reden. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  334. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  335. Patterson D. (2004). (ed.). Wittgenstein and Law. Aldershot: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  336. Patterson, D. (1996). Law and Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  337. Patterson, D. (1999). Recht und Wahrheit. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  338. Patterson, D. (2001). Normativity and Objectivity in Law. William and Mary Law Review, 43(1), 325–363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  339. Pavoni, R. (2010). Freedom to Choose the Legal Means for Implementing UN Security Council Resolutions and the ECJ Kadi Judgment. A Misplaced Argument Hindering the Enforcement of International Law in the EC. Yearbook of European Law, 28, 626–636. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  340. Peirce, C.S. (1997 [1878]). How to Make our Ideas Clear. In: L. Menand (ed.), Pragmatism: A Reader (pp. 26-48). New York: Vintage Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  341. Penn, W. (1693). An Essay Towards the Present and Future Peace of Europe by the Establishment of an European Dyet, Parliament, or Estates. London: [s.n.]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  342. Perju, V. (2009). Reason and Authority in the European Court of Justice. Virginia Journal of International Law, 49(2), 307-378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  343. Pescatore, P. (1972). Le Droit de L‘intégration. Emergence d‘un Phénomène Nouveau dans les Relations Internationales selon L‘expérience des Communautés Européennes. Leiden: Bruylant. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  344. Peters, A. (2011). Membership in the Global Constitutional Community. In: J. Klabbers, A. Peters and G. Ulfstein (eds.), The constitutionalization of international law (pp. 153–341). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  345. Peters, A. (2015). Global Constitutionalism. In: M. Gibbons (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Political Thought (pp. 1484–1487). London: Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  346. Petersen, N. (2009). How Rational is International Law? European Journal of International Law, 20(4), 1247–1262. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  347. Pitkin, H.F. (1972). Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  348. Pitkin, H.F. (1972). Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  349. Pleasants, N. (1999). Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bashkar. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  350. Podiebrad, G. von (1963). Bündnis- und Föderationsvertrag zwischen König Ludwig XI., König Georg von Böhmen und dem Hohen Rat von Venedig, um den Türken zu widerstehen. In: R.H. Foerster (ed.), Die Idee Europa 1300–1946, Quellen zur Geschichte der politischen Einigung (pp. 43–50). München: DTV. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  351. Pollack, M.A. (1997). Delegation, Agency, and Agenda Setting in the European Community. International Organization, 51(1), 99–134. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  352. Pollack, M.A. (2014). Political Science and International Courts. In: C.P.R. Romano, K.J. Alter and Y. Shany (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (pp. 357–387). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  353. Popper, K. (1958). Die offene Gesellschaft und ihre Feinde. (Vol. 2: Falsche Propheten: Hegel, Marx und die Folgen). Bern: A. Francke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  354. Posner, E.A. and Yoo, J.A. (2005). Judicial Independence in International Tribunals. California Law Review, 93(1), 1–74. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  355. Posner, R.A. (2008). How Judges Think. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  356. Potz, A. (2008). Arbeitskampf und Niederlassungsfreiheit. Zum Spannungsverhältnis zwischen Grundrechten und Grundfreiheiten. Das Recht der Wirtschaft, 28, 92–95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  357. Prechal, A.S. (2011). Interview (conducted by A. Grimmel), Europäischer Gerichtshof (E⁠u⁠G⁠H), Luxemburg, 06 April 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  358. Putnam, H. (1994). Words and Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  359. Putnam, H. (1995a). Pragmatism. An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  360. Putnam, H. (1995b). Pragmatismus und Verfikationismus. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie. 43(2), 219-231. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  361. Rasmussen, H. (1986). On Law and Policy in the European Court of Justice: A Comparative Study in Judicial Policymaking. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  362. Rasmussen, H. (1988). Between Self-Restraint and Activism: A Judicial Policy for the European Court, European Law Review, 13(1), 28-38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  363. Rasmussen, H. (1992). Towards a Normative Theory of Interpretation of Community Law. The University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1992/1, 135–178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  364. Rasmussen, M. (2008). The Origins of a Legal Revolution: The Early History of the European Court of Justice. Journal of European Integration History, 14(2), 77–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  365. Read, R.J. (2012). Wittgenstein Among the Sciences: Wittgensteinian Investigations Into the “Scientific Method” (edited by S. Summers). Farnham: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  366. Rebhahn, R. (2008). Grundfreiheit vor Arbeitskampf – Der Fall Viking. Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht, 7(3), 109–117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  367. Reese-Schäfer, W. (2013). Grenzgötter der Moral: Der neuere europäisch-amerikanische Diskurs zur politischen Ethik. Springer VS: Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  368. Reich, N. (2008). Fundamental Freedoms v. Fundamental Rights – Did Viking Get It Wrong?, Europarättslig Tijdskrift, 11(4), 851–873. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  369. Rescher, N. (1973). The Coherence Theory of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  370. Robinson, C.C. (2011). Wittgenstein and Political Theory: The View from Somewhere. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  371. Rohrschneider, R. and Whitefield, S. (2016). Responding to Growing European Union-skepticism? The Stances of Political Parties toward European Integration in Western and Eastern Europe Following the Financial Crisis. European Union Politics, 17(1), 138–161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  372. Romano, C.P.R. (2011). A Taxonomy of International Rule of Law Institutions. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2(1), 241–277. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  373. Romano, C.P.R., Alter, K.J. and Shany, Y. (eds.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  374. Rorty, R. (1961). Pragmatism, Categories, and Language. The Philosophical Review, 70(2), 197-223. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  375. Rorty, R. (1962). Realism, Categories, and the ‘Linguistic Turn’. International Philosophical Quarterly, 2(2), 307-322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  376. Rorty, R. (1972). The World Well Lost. The Journal of Philosophy, 69(19), 649-665 [reprinted in Rorty 1982]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  377. Rorty, R. (1976). Keeping Philosophy Pure: An Essay on Wittgenstein. The Yale Review, 55(3), 336-356 [reprinted in Rorty 1982]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  378. Rorty, R. (1981). Method, Social Science and Social Hope. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 11(4), 569-588 [reprinted in Rorty 1982, 191-210]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  379. Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays 1972-1980). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  380. Rorty, R. (1983). Pragmatism Without Method. In: P. Kurtz (ed.), Sidney Hook. Philosopher of Democracy and Humanism (pp. 259-273). Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  381. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  382. Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  383. Rorty, R. (1996). Response to Ernesto Laclau. In: C. Mouffe (ed.), Deconsruction and Pragmatism. Simon Critchley, Jacques Derrida, Ernesto Laclau and Richard Rorty (pp- 69-76). London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  384. Rorty, R. (1998). Truth and Progress. Philosophical Papers Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  385. Rorty, R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  386. Rorty, R. (2010). Wittgenstein and the Linguistic Turn. In: A. Ahmed (ed.), Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide (pp. 129–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  387. Rosenau, J.N. and Czempiel, E.-O. (1992). Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  388. Rousseau, J.-J. (1953 [1761/1782]). In: G. von Raumer and K. von Raumer (eds.), Auszug aus dem Plan des Ewigen Friedens des Herrn Abbé de Saint-Pierre, Urteil über den ewigen Frieden. Freiburg, München: Verlag Karl Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  389. Ryan, A. (1995). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  390. Saint-Pierre, C.I.C. de (Abbé de) (1713). Projet pour rendre la paix perpétuelle en Europe. Utrecht: Schouten. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  391. Saint-Simon, H. and Thierry, A. (1814). De la réorganisation de la société européenne. Paris: [s.n.]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  392. Sangiovanni, A. (2013). Solidarity in the European Union. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 213–241. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  393. Santos Vara, J. (2011). The Consequences of Kadi. Where the Divergence of Opinion between EU and International Lawyers Lies? European Law Journal, 17(2), 252–274. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  394. Saretzki, T. (2007). Argumentieren, Verhandeln und Strategie. Theoretische Referenzen, begriffliche Unterscheidungen und empirische Studien zu arguing und bargaining in der internationalen Politik. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth (eds.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit (pp. 111–146). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  395. Saurugger, S. (2014). Theoretical Approaches to European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  396. Savigny, E. von (1995). Bedeutung, Sprachspiel, Lebensform. In: K.-O. Apel et al. (eds.), Wittgenstein Studies 2. New York. Available online: http://sammelpunkt.philo.at:8080/456/ [accessed March 2017]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  397. Scharpf, F.W. (1985). Die Politikverflechtungs-Falle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 26(4), 323–356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  398. Scharpf, F.W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Legitimate? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  399. Scharpf, F.W. (2002). Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem – Ansätze zu einer Theorie. Leviathan, 30(1), 65–92. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  400. Scharpf, F.W. (2006). The Joint-Decision Trap Revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 845–864. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  401. Scharpf, F.W. (2008). Der einzige Weg ist, dem E⁠u⁠G⁠H nicht zu folgen. Mitbestimmung, 2008(7/8), 18–23; Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  402. Scharpf, F.W. (2009). Legitimität im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Leviathan, 37(2), 244–280. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  403. Scharpf, F.W. (2012). Perpetual Momentum: Directed and Unconstrained? Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 127–139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  404. Schatzki, T.R. (1991). Elements of a Wittgensteinian Philosophy of the Human Sciences. Synthese, 87(2), 311–329. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  405. Schatzki, T.R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  406. Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and Savigny, E. von (eds.) (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  407. Scheinin, M. (2010). Is the ECJ Ruling in Kadi Incompatible with International Law?, Yearbook of European Law 2009, 28(1), 637–653. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  408. Schepel, H. (2000). Reconstructing Constitutionalization: Law and Politics in the European Court of Justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20(3), 457–468. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  409. Schepel, H. and Blankenburg, E. (2001). Mobilizing the European Court of Justice. In: G. de Búrca and J.H.H. Weiler (eds.), The European Court of Justice (pp. 9–42). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  410. Schimank, U. (2006). „Feindliche Übernahmen“: Typen intersystemischer Autonomiebedrohungen in der modernen Gesellschaft. In: U. Schimank (ed.), Teilsystemische Autonomie und politische Gesellschaftssteuerung (pp. 71–83). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  411. Schimank, U. and Volkmann, U. (1999). Gesellschaftliche Differenzierung. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  412. Schimmelfennig, F. (2001). The Community Trap. Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization. 55(1), 47–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  413. Schimmelfennig, F. (2006). Competition and Community. Constitutional Courts, R⁠h⁠e⁠t⁠o¬r⁠i⁠c⁠a⁠l Action, and the Institutionalization of Human Rights in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(8), 1247–1264. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  414. Schmalz-Bruns, R. (2007a). The Euro-Polity in Perspective: Some Normative Lessons from Deliberative Democracy. In: B. Kohler-Koch and B. Rittberger (eds.), Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union (pp. 281–303). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  415. Schmalz-Bruns, R. (2007b). An den Grenzen der Entstaatlichung: Bemerkungen zu Jürgen Habermas‘ Modell einer „Weltinnenpolitik ohne Weltregierung“. In: P. Niesen and B. Herborth (eds.), Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit (pp. 269–239). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  416. Schmalz-Bruns, R. (2012). Governance als Politische Theorie? In: B. Egner, M. Haus, G. Terizakis and H. Heinelt (eds.), Regieren: Festschrift für Hubert Heinelt (pp. 17–35). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  417. Schmalenbach, K. (2009). Bedingt kooperationsbereit. Der Kontrollanspruch des E⁠u⁠G⁠H bei gezielten Sanktionen der Vereinten Nationen. JuristenZeitung, 64(1), 35–43. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  418. Schmidt, S.K. (2012). Who Cares about Nationality? The Pathdependent Case Law of the ECJ from Goods to Citizens. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 8–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  419. Schmitter, P.C. (1969). Three Neo-Functionalist Hypotheses about International Integration. International Organization, 23(1), 161–166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  420. Schmitter, P.C. (1970). A Revised Theory of Regional Integration. International Organization, 24(4), 836–868. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  421. Schulz, M. (2015). The Situation in Europe Is Extremely Concerning. Interview conducted by H. Knaup, P. Müller. Spiegel online, 01.12.2015. Available online: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/european-union-in-trouble-says-parliament-president-schulz-a-1065306.html [accessed March 2017]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  422. Schulz, M. (2016). Speech at the Award of the Charlemagne Prize 2016. Available online: www.europarl.europa.eu/the-president/en/press/press_release_speeches/speeches/speeches-2016/speeches-2016-may/html/charlemagne-prize-2016-speech-by-the-president-of-the-european-parliament-martin-schulz [accessed August 2016]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  423. Sciarra, S. (2008). Viking and Laval: Collective-Labour Rights and Market-Freedoms in the Enlarged EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10, 563–580. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  424. Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  425. Searle, J.R. (1983). Sprechakte. Ein sprachphilosophischer Essay. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  426. Searle, J.R. (2016). Insight and Error in Wittgenstein. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(6), 527-547. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  427. Shaw, J. (1999). Postnational Constitutionalism in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(4), 579–597. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  428. Shuibhne, N.N. (2010). Settling Dust? Reflections on the Judgements in Viking and Laval. European Business Law Review, 21(5), 683-701. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  429. Simson, W von. and Schwarze, J. (1983). Europäische Integration und Grundgesetz. Maastricht und die Folgen für das Deutsche Verfassungsrecht. In: E. Benda, W. Maihofer and H.-J. Vogel (eds.), Handbuch des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 59–78). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  430. Simson, W. von and Schwarze, J. (1992). Europäische Integration und Grundgesetz. Maastricht und die Folgen für das deutsche Verfassungsrecht. Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  431. Skinner, Q. (1966). The Ideological Context of Hobbes’s Political Thought. The Historical Journal, 9(3), 286-317. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  432. Skinner, Q. (1972). Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts. New Literary History, 3(2), 393-408. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  433. Skouris, V. (2011). Interview (conducted by A. Grimmel), Europäischer Gerichtshof (E⁠u⁠G⁠H), Luxemburg, 07 April 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  434. Slaughter, A.-M. (2003). A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal, 44(1), 191–219. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  435. Snyder, F.G. (1990). New Directions in European Community Law. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  436. Söderbaum, F. (2013). Rethinking Regions and Regionalism. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 14(2), 9–18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  437. Söderbaum, F. (2016). Old, New and Comparative Regionalism: The History and Scholarly Development of the Field. In: T.A. Börzel and T. Risse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (pp. 16–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  438. Solanke, I. (2011). “Stop the ECJ?” An Empirical Assessment of Activism at the Court. European Law Journal, 17(6), 764–784. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  439. Spinelli, A. (1958). Manifest der Europäischen Föderalisten. Frankfurt a.M.: E⁠u⁠r⁠o-p⁠ä⁠i⁠s⁠c⁠h⁠e Verlagsanstalt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  440. Spinelli, A. (1972). The European Adventure: Tasks for the Enlarged Community. London: Charles Knight. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  441. Spinelli, A. and Rossi, E. (1985 [1941]). The Ventotene Manifesto 1941. In: W. Lipgens (ed.), Documents on the History of European Integration (pp. 471–484). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  442. Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75(1),1–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  443. Steinbeis, M. (2013). Richtersprüche als europäische Wegbegleiter – Die Geburtsstunde des Europarecht vor 50 Jahren. Deutschlandfunk, Beitrag vom 03.02.2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  444. Steinvorth, U. (2002). Was ist Vernunft? Eine philosophische Einführung. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  445. Stone Sweet, A. (1999). Judicialization and the Construction of Governance. C⁠o⁠m-p⁠a⁠r⁠a⁠t⁠i⁠v⁠e Political Studies, 32(2), 147–184. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  446. Stone Sweet, A. (2004). The Judicial Construction of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  447. Stone Sweet, A. (2005). European Integration and the Legal System. Political Science Series, 101. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  448. Stone Sweet, A. (2010). The European Court of Justice and the Judicialization of EU Governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 5(2), 1–50. Available online: http://www.europeangovernance-livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2010-2/download/lreg-2010-2Color.pdf [accessed Mai 2017]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  449. Stone Sweet, A. and Brunell, T. (1998). Constructing a Supranational Constitution. Dispute Resolution and Governance in the European Community. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 63–81. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  450. Stone Sweet, A. and Brunell, T. (2010). How the European Union’s Legal System Works – and Does not Work: Response to Carrubba, Gabel, and Hankla. Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series Paper, 68, New Haven, CT. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  451. Stone Sweet, A. and Brunell, T. (2013). Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the European Convention on Human Rights, the European Union, and the World Trade Organization. Journal of Law and Courts, 1(1), 61–88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  452. Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (1997). European Integration and Supranational Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 297–317. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  453. Strauch, H.-J. (2000). Wie wirklich sehen wir die Wirklichkeit? Vom Nutzen des Radikalen Konstruktivismus für die juristische Theorie und Praxis. Juristenzeitung, 21, 1020–1029. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  454. Strauch, H.-J. (2002). Die Bindung des Richters an Recht und Gesetz: eine Bindung durch Kohärenz‘. Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, 85, 311–333. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  455. Strauch, H.-J. (2005). Rechtsprechungstheorie. Richterliche Rechtsanwendung und Kohärenz. In: K.D. Lerch (ed.), Recht verhandeln (pp. 479–519). Berlin: de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  456. Strauss, A.L. (1959). Mirrors and Masks: The Search for Identity. Glencoe: Free Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  457. Telò, M. (2014). European Union, Regionalism, New Multilateralism: Three Scenarios. In: M. Telò (ed.), European Union and New Regionalism (pp. 323-358). Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  458. Teubner, G. (2003). Der Umgang mit den Rechtsparadoxien: Derrida, Luhmann, Wiethölter. In: C. Joerges and G. Teubner (eds.), Rechtsverfassungsrecht: Recht-Fertigung zwischen Privatrechtsdogmatik und Gesellschaftstheorie (pp. 24–46). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  459. Teubner, G. (2008). Selbstsubversive Gerechtigkeit: Kontingenz- oder Transzendenzformel des Rechts? Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 29(1), 9–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  460. Teubner, G. (2011a). Debate and Dialogue: Constitutionalizing Polycontexturality. Social & Legal Studies, 20(2), 210–229. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  461. Teubner, G. (2011b). A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of ‘Hitting the Bottom’. In: P.F. Kjaer, G. Teubner and A. Febbrajo (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation (pp. 3–42). Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  462. Teubner, G. (2012). Verfassungsfragmente: Gesellschaftlicher Konstitutionalismus in der Globalisierung. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  463. Thornhill, C.J. (2006). Luhmann’s Political Theory: Politics After Metaphysics? In: M. King and C. Thornhill (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications (pp. 75–100). Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  464. Thornhill, C.J. (2011). A Sociology of Constitutions: Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  465. Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  466. Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  467. Tsipras, A. (2015). Summary Comments at the European Parliament. Strasbourg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  468. Tully, J. (ed.) (1989a). Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  469. Tully, J. (1989b). Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy: Understanding Practices of C⁠r⁠i-t⁠i⁠c⁠a⁠l Reflection. Political Theory, 17(2), 172–204. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  470. Tuori, K. and Sankari, S. (eds.) (2010). The Many Constitutions of Europe. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  471. Ulfstein, G. (2011). Empowerment and Constitutional Control. In: J. Klabbers, A. Peters and G. Ulfstein (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law (pp. 356–359). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  472. Usher, J.A. (1998). General Principles of EC Law. London: Longman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  473. van den Herik, L. and Schrijver, N. (2008). Eroding the Primacy of the UN System of Collective Security – The Judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Cases of Kadi and Al Barakaat. International Organizations Law Review, 5(2), 329–339. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  474. Van Harten, G. (2010). Five Justifications for Investment Treaties: A Critical Discussion. Trade, Law and Development, 2(1), 19–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  475. van Rompuy, H. (2011). The Economic and Political Challenges for Europe. Speech at the Opening of the Academic Year 2011–2012. European University Institute. Fiesole. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  476. Vanberg, G. (1998). Abstract Judicial Review, Legislative Bargaining, and Policy Compromise. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(3), 299–326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  477. Vauchez, A. (2007). Embedded Law. Political Sociology of the European Community of Law, Elements of a Renewed Research Agenda. European University Institute Working Papers, 23/2007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  478. Vauchez, A. (2008). How to Become a Transnational Elite. Lawyers’ Politics at the Genesis of the European Communities (1950-1970). In: H. Petersen, A.L. Kjær, H. Krunke and M.R. Madsen (eds.), Paradoxes of European Legal Integration. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  479. Vauchez, A. (2010). The Transnational Politics of Judicialization: Van Gend en Loos and the Making of EU Polity. European Law Journal, 16(1), 1–28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  480. Vauchez, A. (2012). Keeping the Dream Alive: the European Court of Justice and the Transnational Fabric of Integrationist Jurisprudence. European Political Science Review, 4(1), 51–71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  481. Verhofstadt, G. (2014). Nobody wants a European super-state. Interview conducted by M. Tholl. The European, 17 March 2014. Available online: http://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/guy-verhofstadt--3/8222-guy-verhofstadt-on-the-upcoming-ep-elections [accessed March 2017]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  482. Voeten, E. (2010). Borrowing and Non-Borrowing among International Courts. Journal of Legal Studies, 39(2), 547–576. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  483. Voßkuhle, A. and Wischmeyer, T. (2015). Der Jurist im Kontext: Peter Häberle zum 80. Geburtstag. In: S. Baer, O. Lepsius, C. Schönberger, C. Waldhoff and C. Walter (eds.), Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart (pp. 401–428). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  484. Wahl, R. (2002). Konstitutionalisierung: Leitbegriff oder Allerweltsbegriff? In: C.-E. Eberle, M. Ibler and D. Lorenz (eds.), Der Wandel des Staates vor den Herausforderungen der Gegenwart, Festschrift für Winfried Brohm zum 70. Geburtstag (pp. 191–208). München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  485. Walter, K. (2009). Rechtsfortbildung durch den E⁠u⁠G⁠H: Eine rechtsmethodische Untersuchung von der deutschen und französischen Methodenlehre. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  486. Ward, I. (2009). A Critical Introduction to European Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  487. Weatherill, S. (1995). Law and Integration in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  488. Webber, D. (2014). How Likely is it That the European Union will Disintegrate? A Critical Analysis of Competing Theoretical Perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 20(2), 341–365. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  489. Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and Society. Los Angeles: University California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  490. Weber, M. (1980 [1922]). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  491. Weber, M. (1988). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. (edited by Johannes Winckelmann). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  492. Weiler, J.H.H. (1981). The Community System, The Dual Character of Supranationalism. Yearbook of European Law, 1/1981, 267–306. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  493. Weiler, J.H.H. (1991). The Transformation of Europe. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), 2403–2483. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  494. Weiler, J.H.H. (1993). Journey to an Unknown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 417–446. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  495. Weiler, J.H.H. (1994). A Quiet Revolution. The European Court of Justice and Its Interlocutors, Comparative Political Studies, 26(4), 510–534. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  496. Weiler, J.H.H. (2002). The Constitution of Europe: „Do the New Clothes have an Emperor?“ and other Essays on European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  497. Weldes, J. and Saco, D. (1996). Making State Action Possible: The United States and the Discursive Construction of ‘The Cuban Problem’, 1960-1994. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25(2). 361–395. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  498. Westbrook, R. (1991). John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  499. Wiener, A. (2008). The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  500. Wiener, A. (2009). Enacting Meaning-In-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations. Review of International Studies, 35(1), 175–193. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  501. Wiener, A. and Diez, T. (eds.) (2009). European Integration Theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  502. Wiener, A., Lang, A.F., Tully, J., Poiares Maduro, M. and Kumm, M. (2012). Global Constitutionalism: Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 1–15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  503. Williamson, T. (2005). Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(219), 213–235. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  504. Winch, P. (1990 [1958]). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy [ISS]. 2., rev. ed. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  505. Winch, P. (1992). Trying to Make Sense. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  506. Wind, M., Martinsen, D.S. and Pons-Rotger, G. (2009). The Uneven Legal Push for Europe: Questioning Variation when National Courts Go to Europe. European Union Politics, 10(1), 63–88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  507. Wißmann, H. (2009). Zwischenruf – Viking und Laval. EG-Grundfreiheiten über alles? Arbeit und Recht, 149, 149–151. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  508. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [TLP]. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  509. Wittgenstein, L. (1956). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics [RFM]. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  510. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations” Generally Known as The Blue and Brown Books [BB]. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  511. Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty [OC]. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  512. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1 [RPP]. (trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  513. Wittgenstein, L. (1984). Tractatus logico-philosophicus – Tagebücher 1914-1916 – Philosophische Untersuchungen [PU], Werkausgabe Bd.1. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  514. Wittgenstein, L. (2001 [1953]). Philosophical Investigations [PI]. Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  515. Wodak, R. and Fairclough, N. (2010). Recontextualizing European Higher Education Policies: The Cases of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(1), 19–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  516. Wulff, E. (2003). Wahnsinnslogik: Von der Verstehbarkeit schizophrener Erfahrung. Hamburg: Argument-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  517. Zürn, M. (1998). Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats: Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327
  518. Zürn, M. and Checkel, J.T. (2005). Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State. International Organization, 59(4), 1045–1079. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845299327

Similar publications

from the series "Politik und Recht"
Cover of book: Zwischen politischer und rechtlicher Verfassung
Book Titles No access
Henning Schäckelhoff
Zwischen politischer und rechtlicher Verfassung
Cover of book: The Constitutional Court of Turkey
Book Titles Full access
Silvia von Steinsdorff, Ece Göztepe, Maria Abad Andrade, Felix Petersen
The Constitutional Court of Turkey
Cover of book: Menschenrechte als Teilhaberechte an politischen Gesellschaften
Book Titles No access
Johannes Icking
Menschenrechte als Teilhaberechte an politischen Gesellschaften
Cover of book: Verfassungsgerichtliche Entscheidungsfindung und ihre Folgen
Book Titles No access
Maria Abad Andrade
Verfassungsgerichtliche Entscheidungsfindung und ihre Folgen
Cover of book: Die Verfassungsinterpretation am US-Supreme Court
Book Titles No access
Sebastian Dregger
Die Verfassungsinterpretation am US-Supreme Court

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex