Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Subscribe
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Volume No access

Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3

Die Unternehmung
Authors:
Journal:
Die Unternehmung
Publisher:
 2019

Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print
0042-059X
ISSN-Online
0042-059X
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Language
German
Product type
Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page I - II
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 191 - 192
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 193 - 212
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 213 - 228
To successfully offer services, organizations have to recognize the relevance of their service employees and enable them to demonstrate a service-oriented behavior towards their customers. Service-oriented leadership specifically addresses this...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 229 - 249
Little is known about how relevant workplace flexibility is on continued work in one’s career job - a type of bridge employment that should best help to reduce the negative aspects of skilled worker shortage. We therefore examined the role of...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 250 - 275
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 276 - 278
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Authors:
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 279 - 281
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Download Article (PDF)
Cover of Volume: Die Unternehmung Volume 73 (2019), Edition 3
Article
Full access

Page 282 - 284
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2019
Download Article (PDF)

Bibliography (273)

  1. Argyris, C./Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(99), 120. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  3. Baumöl, U. (2008). Change Management in Organisationen. Situative Methodenkonstruktion für flexible Veränderungsprozesse. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  4. Becker, J. et al. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  5. Berghaus, S./Back, A. (2016). Gestaltungsbereiche der Digitalen Transformation: Entwicklung eines Reifegradmodells. Die Unternehmung. Swiss Journal for Research and Practice, 70(2), 98–122. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  6. Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership, 40(2), 16–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  7. Blank, S. (2015). Lean Innovation Management – Making Corporate Innovation Work. Gefunden am 1.7.18 unter http://steveblank.com/2015/06/26/lean-innovation-management-making-corporate-innovation-work/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  8. Blohm, I. (2013). Open Innovation Communities – Absorptive Capacity und kollektive Ideenbewertung. Dissertation, Technische Universität München. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  9. Bonzom, A./Netessine, S. (2016). How do the world’s biggest companies deal with the startup revolution. Gefunden am 23.8.17 unter http://698640.hs-sites.com/500corporations. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  10. Bourreau, M. et al. (2012). The Impact of a Radical Innovation on Business Models: Incremental Adjustments or Big Bang? Industry and Innovation, 19(5), 415–435. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  11. Chakravarty, A. et al. (2013). Information Technology Competencies, Organizational Agility, and Firm Performance: Enabling and Facilitating Roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976–997. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  12. Chesbrough, H. (2017). The Future of Open Innovation. The future of open innovation is more extensive, more collaborative, and more engaged with a wider variety of participants. Research-Technology Management, 60(1), 35–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  13. Chesbrough, H./Brunswicker, S. (2014), “A Fad or a Phenomenon? The Adoption of Open Innovation Practices in Large Firms”. Research Technology Management, 57(2), 16–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  14. Clarysse, B./Yusubova, A. (2014). Success factors of business accelerators. Technology Business Incubation Mechanisms and Sustainable Regional Development, Proceedings. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  15. Cravens, D. W., et al. (2009). Management framework guiding strategic thinking in rapidly changing markets. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(1/2), 31–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  16. Davison, R.M. et al. (2012). The Roles of Theorie in Canonical Action Research. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3, S. 763–765. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  17. De Bruin, T. et al. (2005). Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. In Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS). Australasian Chapter of the Association for Information Systems. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  18. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale Development: theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  19. Dyer, J. H. et al. (2004). When to Ally and when to Acquire. Harvard Business Review, July-August 2004. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M./Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilites: What are They? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10), 1105–1121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  21. Galliers, R. D./ Jarvenpaa, S. (2002). Editorial. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(1), 1–3. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  22. Gaponova, O.S./Korshunov, I.A. (2018). Deploying a Corporate Learning System at the Innovative Startup. Russian Education & Society, 60:4, 289–314. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  23. Green, W./Cluley, R. (2014). The field of radical innovation: Making sense of organizational cultures and radical innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1343–1350. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  24. Grippa, F. et al. (2018). Collaborative Innovation Networks: Building Adaptive and Resilient Organizations. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  25. Hansen, A. M. et al. (2011). Rapid Adaptation in Digital Transformation: A Participatory Process for Engaging IS and Business Leaders. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4), 175–185. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  26. Hathaway, I. (2016). “What Startup Accelerators Really Do”. Harvard Business Review, 7, 2016. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  27. Henfridsson, O./Lind, M. (2014). Information systems strategizing, organizational sub-communities, and the emergence of a sustainability strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 11–28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  28. Hevner, A. et al. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quar-terly, 28(1), 75–105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  29. Hoffmann, W. H./Schaper-Rinkel, W. (2001). Acquire or Ally? -A Strategy Framework for Deciding Between Acquisition and Cooperation. MIR: Management International Review, 41(2), 131–159. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  30. Jahani, B. et al. (2010). Measurement of enterprise architecture readiness within organizations. Business Strategy Series, 11(3), 177–191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  31. Kale, P./Puranam, P. (2004). Choosing Equity Stakes in Technology-Sourcing Relationships: An Integrative Framework. California Management Review, 46(3), 77–99. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  32. Kohler, T. (2016), “Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups”. Business Horizons, 59(3), 347–357. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  33. Kupp, M. et al. (2017). Corporate accelerators: fostering innovation while bringing together startups and large firms. Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 38 Issue: 6, S.47 – 53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  34. Leimeister, J.M. (2004). Pilotierung virtueller Communities im Gesundheitsbereich – Bedarfsgerechte Entwicklung, Einführung und Betrieb. Dissertation, Universität Hohenheim. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  35. Lichtenthaler, U. (2016). Five steps to transforming innovation processes: continually adjusting to new environments. Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 37 Issue: 5, S.39 – 45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  36. Lopez-Hernandez, A.K. et al. (2018). Team collaboration capabilities as a factor in startup success. Journal of Technololgy Management & Innovation, 2018. Volume 13, Issue 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  37. Lyytinen, K./Rose, G. M. (2003). The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 557–595. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  38. Mahmoud-Jouini, S.B. et al. (2018). Key Factors in Building a Corporate Accelerator Capability. Research-Technology Management, 61:4, 26–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  39. Malone, T.W./Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination”. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87–119. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  40. March, S.T./Storey, V.C. (2008). Design science in the information systems discipline: An introduction to the special issue on design science research. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 725–730. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  41. Mayring, P. (2002). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung – eine Anleitung zum qualitativen Denken. [Introduction to qualitative social research]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  42. Mercandetti, F. et al. (2017). Innovation by Collaboration between Startups and SMEs in Switzerland. Technology Innovation Management Review, December 2017, Vol.7, Issue 12. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  43. Mintzberg, H. (2015), “We Need Both Networks and Communities”. Harvard Business Review, 10, 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  44. Mocker, V. et al. (2015). Winning Together: A guide to successful corporate-startup collaborations. Nesta. Gefunden am 11.7.18 unter https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/winning-together-sum- mary_0.pdf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  45. Moreau, F. (2013). The Disruptive Nature of Digitization: The Case of the Recorded Music Industry. International Journal of Arts Management, 15(2), 18–31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  46. Mumford, E. (2001). Advice for an action researcher. In: Information & People, Vol. 14, Iss: 1, S.12 – 27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  47. Österle, H. (1995). Business Engineering: Prozess- und Systementwicklung. Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  48. Oxford Dictionaries (2017), “Ecosystem”, Oxford Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gefunden am 11.7.18 unter https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ecosystem. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  49. Park, J.-H./Bae, Z.-T. (2018). When are ‘sharks’ beneficial? Corporate venture capital investment and startup innovation performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30:3, 324–336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  50. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4 ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  51. Pauwels, C. et al. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation 50–51:13–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  52. Peffers, K. et al. (2006). The design science research process: A model for producing and presenting information systems research. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), 83–106. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  53. Peffers, K. et al. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24 (3), 45–77. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  54. Quaadgras, A. et al. (2014). Management commitments that maximize business impact from IT. Journal of Information Technology, 29(2), 114–127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  55. Richter, N. et al. (2017). Outsourcing creativity: An abductive study of open innovation using corporate accelerators. Creative Innovation Management, 2018; 27: 69–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  56. Rittel, H./Webbe, M.r (1984) Planning problems are wicked problems. Developments in Design Methodology, N. Cross (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, 135–144. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  57. Röglinger, M. et al. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 328–346. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  58. Rosenzweig, P. (2013). What Makes Strategic Decisions Different. Harvard Business Review, November, 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  59. Rüegg-Stürm, J. (2004) The new St. Gallen management model: basic categories of an approach to integrated management. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, 88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  60. Schmidt, C. (2004). The Analysis of Semi-structured Interviews. In U. Flick, E. Von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 253–257). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  61. Shivakumar, R. (2014). How To Tell Which Decisions Are Strategic. California Management Review, 56(3), 78–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  62. Simon, H.A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  63. Sinclair, J. et al. (1995). Collins Cobuild English Dictionary. Harper Collins Publishers, London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  64. Smorodinskaya, N. et al. (2017). Innovation Ecosystems vs. Innovation Systems in Terms of Collaboration and Co-Creation of Value. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Hawaii, January 4–7, 2017, 5245–5254. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  65. Stippler, M. et al. (2011). Führung – Überblick über Ansätze, Entwicklungen, Trends. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  66. Stoller-Schai, D. (2003). E-Collaboration: Die Gestaltung internetgestützter kollaborativer Handlungsfelder. Dissertation, University of St.Gallen. Difo-Druck, Bamberg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  67. Strauss, A. L./Corbin, J. M. (1990): Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif.: SAGE. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  68. Suominen, A. et al. (2016). Innovation Systems and Ecosystems: A Review and Synthesis. XXVII ISPIM Innovation Conference. Porto, Portugal, 19–22 June 2016. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  69. Tech, R. (2018). Financing High-Tech Startups – Using Productive Signaling to Efficiently Overcome the Liability of Complexity. Cham: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  70. Teece, D. J. et al. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  71. Tornatzky, L. G. et al. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, Massachuttes. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  72. Vaishnavi, V.K./Kuechler, W. (2007). Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology. Auerbach Publications, New York. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  73. Van Aken, J. E. (2005). Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 19–36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  74. Villalonga, B./McGahan, A. M. (2005). The Choice among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1183–1208. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  75. Vom Brocke, J. et al. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. ECIS 2009 Proceedings. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  76. Waters-Lynch, J./Potts, J. (2017). The social economy of coworking spaces: a focal point model of coordination. Review of Social Economy, 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  77. Weiblen, T./Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California Management Review, 57(2), 66–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  78. Wennberg, K. et al. (2016). Variable risk preferences in new firm growth and survival. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 408–427. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  79. Werro, T. (2017). How Corporates Innovate with Startups – Options and Guidelines for Collaborative Open Innovation with Examples from Silicon Valley. Masterarbeit, Universität St.Gallen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  80. Weiblen, T./Chesbrough, H. W. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation”, California Management Review, 57(2), 66–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  81. Winter, R. (2011). Business Engineering Navigator. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  82. Yoo, Y. et al. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-193
  83. Avolio, B.J., et al. (1991): Leading in the 1990s: The four I′s of transformational leadership, in: Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 15, No. 4, S. 9–16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  84. Bagozzi, R.P./Phillips, L.W. (1982): Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construal, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, S. 459–489. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  85. Bagozzi, R.P./Yi, Y. (1988): On the evaluation of structural equation models, in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, S. 74–94. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  86. Bass, B.M. (1985): Leadership and Performance beyond Expectation, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  87. Benkenstein, M., et al. (2017): Topics for Service Management Research-A European Perspective, in: Journal of Service Management Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, S. 4–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  88. Berry, L.L./Parasuraman, A. (1992): Service Marketing starts from within, in: Marketing Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, S. 24–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  89. Bettencourt, L.A., et al. (2001): A Comparison of Attitude, Personality, and Knowledge Predictors of Service-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behaviors, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, S. 29–41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  90. Bitner, M., et al. (1990): The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54 No. 1, S. 71–84. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  91. Borucki, C.C./Burke, M.J. (1999): An examination of service-related antecedents to retail store performance, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 No. 6, S. 943–962. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  92. Bowen, D.E./Lawler, E.E. (1992): Total quality-oriented human resources management, in: Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 20, No. 4, S. 29–41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  93. Bowen, D.E./Schneider, B. (1985): Boundary-spanning-role employees and the service encounter: Some guidelines for management and research, in: Czepiel, J.A., et al. (Eds.): The service encounter, Lexington, MA, S. 127–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  94. Bowen, D.E./Schneider, B. (1988): Services marketing and management: Implications for organizational behavior, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, S. 43–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  95. Bowen, D.E./Schneider, B. (2014): A service climate synthesis and future research agenda, in: Journal of Service Research, Vol. 17, S. 5–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  96. Burke, M.J., et al. (1992): Reconceptualizing psychological climate in a retail service environment: A multiple-stakeholder perspective, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 77, S. 717–729. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  97. Büttgen, M./Österle, L. (2017): Mitarbeiterführung im Dienstleistungsmanagement, in: Corsten, H./Roth, S. (Eds.): Handbuch Dienstleistungsmanagement, München, S. 945–964. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  98. Chen, F.F. (2007): Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance, in: Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 14, S. 464–504. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  99. Chen, T.J./Wu, C.M. (2017): Improving the turnover intention of tourist hotel employees: Transformational leadership, leader-member exchange, and psychological contract breach, in: International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 29, S. 1914–1936. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  100. Chen, Z., et al. (2015): How Does a Servant Leader Fuel the Service Fire? A Multilevel Model of Servant Leadership, Individual Self Identity, Group Competition Climate, and Customer Service Performance, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 100, S. 1–11. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  101. Cheung, G.W./Rensvold, R.B. (2002): Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance, in: Structural Equation Modeling, Vol. 9, S. 233–255. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  102. DeVellis, R.F. (2017): Scale Development Theory and Applications, Chapel Hill, NC. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  103. Ehrhart, M.G. (2004): Leadership and Procedural Justice Climate as Antecedents of Unit-Level Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 57, S. 61–94. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  104. Fiedler, F.E. (1967): A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  105. Fornell, C./Larcker, D.F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, S. 39–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  106. Glaser, B.G/Strauss, A.L. (1967): The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  107. Graham, J.W. (1991): Servant-leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral, in: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 2, S. 105–119. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  108. Gregory Stone, A., et al. (2004): Transformational versus servant leadership: a difference in leader focus, in: Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 25, S. 349–361. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  109. Hackman, J.R./Oldham, G.R. (1975): Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 60, S. 159–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  110. Hallowell, R., et al. (1996): Internal service quality, customer and job satisfaction: Linkages and implications for management, in: People and Strategy, Vol. 19, No. 2, S. 20–31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  111. Heskett, J.L., et al. (1994): Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No. 2, S. 164–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  112. Homburg, C./Stock, R.M. (2005): Exploring the Conditions Under Which Salesperson Work Satisfaction Can Lead to Customer Satisfaction, in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 22, S. 393–420. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  113. Hong, Y., et al. (2013): Missing Link in the Service Profit Chain: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Antecedents, Consequences, and Moderators of Service Climate, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 98, S. 237–267. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  114. Horwitz, F.M./Neville, M.A. (1996): Organization design for service excellence: A review of the literature, in: Human Resource Management, Vol. 35, S. 471–492. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  115. Jiang, K., et al. (2015): Developing collective customer knowledge and service climate: The interaction between service-oriented high-performance work systems and service leadership, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 100, S. 1089–1107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  116. Jun, M., et al. (2006): TQM practice in maquiladora: Antecedents of employee satisfaction and loyalty, in: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24, S. 791–812. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  117. Kindström, D. (2010): Towards a service-based business model-Key aspects for future competitive advantage, in: European Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 6, S. 479–490. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  118. Liao, H./Chuang, A. (2004): A multilevel investigation of factors influencing employee service performance and customer outcomes, in: The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, S. 41–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  119. Liden, R.C., et al. (2008): Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment, in: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 19, S. 161–177. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  120. Liden, R.C., et al. (2014): Servant Leadership and Serving Culture: Influence of individual and unit performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 57, S. 1434–1452. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  121. Lytle, R.S., et al. (1998): SERV*OR: A Managerial Measure of Organizational Service-Orientation, in: Journal of Retailing, Vol. 74, S. 455–489. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  122. MacKenzie, S.B., et al. (2011): Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques, in: MIS Quarterly, Vol. 35, S. 293–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  123. Meffert, H., et al. (2018): Dienstleistungsmarketing: Grundlagen-Konzepte-Methoden, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  124. Nerdinger, F.W./Pundt, A. (2018): Leadership of Service Employees-A Narrative Review, in: Journal of Service Management Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, S. 3–15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  125. Nunnally, J.C. (1978): Psychometric Theory, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  126. Ong, A.D./van Dulmen, M.H.M. (2007): Oxford Handbook of Methods in Positive Psychology, New York, NY. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  127. Pearse, N.J. (2017): Service of followers as a leadership competency: a social exchange perspective, in: Journal of Management Development, Vol. 36, S. 361–375. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  128. Peter, J.P. (1981): Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, S. 133–145. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  129. Popli, S./Rizvi, I.A. (2015): Exploring the relationship between service orientation, employee engagement and perceived leadership style: a study of managers in the private service sector organizations in India, in: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 1, S. 59–70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  130. Popli, S./Rizvi, I.A. (2017): Leadership style and service orientation: the catalytic role of employee engagement, in: Journal of Service Theory and Practice, Vol. 27, S. 292–310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  131. Rafferty, A.E./Griffin, M.A. (2004): Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions, in: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15, S. 329–354. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  132. Salvaggio, A.N., et al. (2007): Manager Personality, manager service quality orientation, and service climate: test of a model, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, S. 1741–1750. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  133. Schneider, B./Bowen, D.E. (1985): Employee and Customer Perceptions of Service in Banks: Replication and Extension, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70, S. 423–433. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  134. Schneider, B./Bowen, D.E. (1993): The Service Organization: Human Resources Management Is Crucial, in: Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 4, S. 39–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  135. Schneider, B., et al. (1998): Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, S. 150–163. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  136. Schneider, B., et al. (2005): Understanding organization-customer links in service settings, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, S. 1017–1032. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  137. Schneider, B., et al. (2017): Organizational climate and culture: Reflections on the history of the constructs in the Journal of Applied Psychology, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 102, S. 468–482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  138. Shimp, T.A./Sharma, S. (1987): Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24, S. 280–289. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  139. Steenkamp, J.B.E./Baumgartner, H. (1998): Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research, in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, S. 78–90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  140. Susskind, A.M., et al. (2003): Customer service providers’ attitudes relating to customer service and customer satisfaction in the customer-server exchange, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, S. 197–187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  141. Wirtz, J./Jerger, C. (2016): Managing service employees: literature review, expert opinions, and research directions, in: The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 36, No. 15–16, S.757 – 788. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  142. Yukl, G. (1989): Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 15, S. 251–189. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  143. Yukl, G. (1999): An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories, in: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 10, S. 285–305. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  144. Yukl, G. (2012): Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention, in: The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 26, No. 4, S. 66–85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  145. Zablah, A.R., et al. (2016): A cross-lagged test of the association between customer satisfaction and employee job satisfaction in a relational context, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 101, No. 5, S. 743–755. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-213
  146. Alcover C-M, Topa G, Parry E, et al. (2014) Bridge employment: an introduction and overview of the handbook. In: Alcover C-M, Topa G, Parry E, et al. (eds) Bridge Employment: A Research Handbook. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 3–24. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  147. Bal PM & Lange AHD (2015) From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 88(1): 126–154. DOI: 10.1111/joop.12082. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  148. Bal PM, Jong SBD, Jansen PGW, et al. (2012) Motivating Employees to Work Beyond Retirement: A Multi-Level Study of the Role of I-Deals and Unit Climate. Journal of Management Studies 49(2): 306–331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467 – 6486.2011.01026.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  149. Beehr TA & Bennett MM (2015) Working After Retirement: Features of Bridge Employment and Research Directions. Work, Aging and Retirement 1(1): 112–128. DOI: 10.1093/workar/wau007. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  150. Bieling G, Stock RM & Dorozalla F (2015) Coping with Demographic Change in Job Markets: How Age Diversity Management Contributes to Organisational Performance. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 29(1): 5–30. DOI: 10.1177/239700221502900101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  151. Breaugh JA & Farabee AM (2012) Telecommuting and Flexible Work Hours: Alternative Work Arrangements that Can Improve the Quality of Work Life. In: Work and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 251–274. DOI: 10.1007/978–94–007–4059–4_14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  152. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (BSV) (2017) Altervorsorge 2020 – Die Vorlage. Available at: https://www.bsv.admin.ch/bsv/de/home/sozialversicherungen/ahv/reformen-revisionen/altersvorsorge2020/vorlage.html (accessed 10 July 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  153. Bundesamt für Statistik (BfS) (2018) Schlüsselindikator Freiwilligenarbeit. Available at: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/soziale-sicherheit/sozialberichterstattung/indikatoren-altersvorsorge/lebensqualitaet-alter.html (accessed 11 February 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  154. Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS) / Federal Statistical Office (FSO) (2015) Szenarien Zur Bevölkerungsentwicklung Der Schweiz – 2015–2045. Neuchâtel: Bundesamt für Statistik (BFS). Available at: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/kataloge-datenbanken/publikationen.assetdetail.350324.html (accessed 9 July 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  155. Cahill KE, Giandrea MD, Quinn JF, et al. (2013) Bridge Employment. In: The Oxford Handbook of Retirement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–310. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  156. Cahill KE, James JB & Pitt-Catsouphes M (2015) The Impact of a Randomly Assigned Time and Place Management Initiative on Work and Retirement Expectations. Work, Aging and Retirement 1(4): 350–368. DOI: 10.1093/workar/wav012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  157. Chung H & Tijdens K (2013) Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: using company-level data across 21 countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 24(7): 1418–1434. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2012.712544. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  158. Damman M (2016) Blended Work and Employment Participation of Older Workers: A Further Discussion. Work, Aging and Retirement 2(4): 384–389. DOI: 10.1093/workar/waw022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  159. Deller, J., Liedtke, P. M., & Maxin, L. M. (2009) Old-Age Security and Silver Workers: An Empirical Survey Identifies Challenges for Companies, Insurers and Society. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice, 34(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/gpp.2008.44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  160. Dendinger, V. M., Adams, G. A., & Jacobson, J. D. (2005) Reasons for Working and Their Relationship to Retirement Attitudes, Job Satisfaction and Occupational Self-Efficacy of Bridge Employees. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.2190/K8KU-46LH-DTW5-44TU. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  161. Desombre T, Kelliher C, Macfarlane F, et al. (2006) Re-Organizing Work Roles in Health Care: Evidence from the Implementation of Functional Flexibility. British Journal of Management 17(2): 139–151. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467 – 8551.2005.00473.x. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  162. Dingemans E, Henkens K & van Solinge H (2017) Working retirees in Europe: individual and societal determinants. Work, Employment and Society 31(6): 972–991. DOI: 10.1177/0950017016664677. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  163. Dropkin J, Moline J, Kim H, et al. (2016) Blended Work as a Bridge Between Traditional Workplace Employment and Retirement: A Conceptual Review. Work, Aging and Retirement 2(4): 373–383. DOI: 10.1093/workar/waw017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  164. Earl C & Taylor P (2015) Is Workplace Flexibility Good Policy? Evaluating the Efficacy of Age Management Strategies for Older Women Workers. Work, Aging and Retirement 1(2): 214–226. DOI: 10.1093/workar/wau012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  165. Elovainio M, Forma P, Kivimäki M, et al. (2005) Job demands and job control as correlates of early retirement thoughts in Finnish social and health care employees. Work & Stress 19(1): 84–92. DOI: 10.1080/02678370500084623. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  166. Fasbender, U., Wang, M., Voltmer, J.-B., & Deller, J. (2016) The Meaning of Work for Post-retirement Employment Decisions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wav015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  167. Gareis K, Korte WB & Gareis K (2002) ICTs and the Adaptability of Work Arrangements in the EU. ECIS 2002 Proceedings. Paper 54. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.822.8911&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 9 July 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  168. Gobeski KT & Beehr TA (2009) How retirees work: predictors of different types of bridge employment. Journal of Organizational Behavior 30(3): 401–425. DOI: 10.1002/job.547. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  169. Hill EJ, Grzywacz JG, Allen S, et al. (2008) Defining and conceptualizing workplace flexibility. Community, Work & Family 11(2): 149–163. DOI: 10.1080/13668800802024678. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  170. Höpflinger F (2015) Späte Erwerbsjahre und nachberufliche Arbeitsformen. 2. vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. In: Zölch M & Mücke A (eds). Bern: Haupt Verlag, pp. 434–451. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  171. Jahoda M (1997) Manifest and latent functions. In: Nicholson N (ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopedic Cictionary of Organizational Psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 317–318. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  172. Jex SM & Grosch J (2013) Retirement decision making. In: Wang M (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Retirement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 267–279. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  173. Kelliher C & Riley M (2003) Beyond efficiency: some By-products of functional flexibility. The Service Industries Journal 23(4): 98–113. DOI: 10.1080/02642060412331301032. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  174. Kim S & Feldman DC (2000) Working in Retirement: The Antecedents of Bridge Employment and Its Consequences for Quality of Life in Retirement. Academy of Management Journal 43(6): 1195–1210. DOI: 10.2307/1556345. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  175. Kröll C & Nüesch S (2017) The effects of flexible work practices on employee attitudes: evidence from a large-scale panel study in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 0(0): 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1289548. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  176. Kuckartz U (2016) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse – Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. 3., überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  177. Lawton C & Wheatley D (2018) The Quality of Work Among Older Workers. In: Caven V & Nachmias S (eds) Hidden Inequalities in the Workplace. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 91–126. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–319–59686–0_5. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  178. Loretto W & Vickerstaff S (2015) Gender, age and flexible working in later life. Work, Employment & Society 29(2): 233–249. DOI: 10.1177/0950017014545267. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  179. Matz-Costa C & Pitt-Catsouphes M (2010) Workplace Flexibility as an Organizational Response to the Aging of the Workforce: A Comparison of Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizations. Journal of Social Service Research 36(1): 68–80. DOI: 10.1080/01488370903333645. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  180. Maxin L & Deller J (2011) Activities in Retirement: Individual Experience of Silver Work. Comparative Population Studies 35(4). Available at: http://www.comparativepopulationstudies.de/index.php/CPoS/article/view/57 (accessed 9 July 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  181. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002) Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  182. McNamara TK, Brown M & Pitt-Catsouphes M (2012) Motivators for and barriers against workplace flexibility: comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and public sector organizations. Community, Work & Family 15(4): 487–500. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2012.732789. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  183. Mor-Barak, M. E. (1995) The Meaning of Work for Older Adults Seeking Employment: The Generativity Factor. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(4), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.2190/VGTG-EPK6-Q4BH-Q67Q. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  184. Pleau RL (2010) Gender Differences in Postretirement Employment. Research on Aging 32(3): 267–303. DOI: 10.1177/0164027509357706. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  185. Polkinghorne DE (2005) Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52(2): 137–145. DOI: 10.1037/0022–0167.52.2.137. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  186. Possenriede D, Hassink WHJ & Plantenga J (2016) Does temporal and locational flexibility of work increase the supply of working hours? Evidence from the Netherlands. IZA Journal of Labor Policy 5(1). DOI: 10.1186/s40173–016–0072-y. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  187. Reilly PA (1998) Balancing Flexibility – Meeting the Interests of Employer and Employee. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 7(1): 7–22. DOI: 10.1080/135943298398934. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  188. Reilly PA (2001) Flexibility at Work: Balancing the Interest of Employer and Employee. Hampshire: Gower Publishing Limited. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  189. Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  190. Schnell T, Höge T & Pollet E (2013) Predicting meaning in work: Theory, data, implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology 8(6): 543–554. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2013.830763. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  191. SECO (2016) Fachkräftemangel in der Schweiz Indikatorensystem zur Beurteilung der Fachkräftenachfrage. Bern: Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  192. Shacklock K & Brunetto Y (2011) A model of older workers’ intentions to continue working. Personnel Review 40(1–2): 252–274. DOI: 10.1108/00483481111106110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  193. Sloan Center on Aging & Work at Boston College (n.d.) What is Workplace Flexibility? Available at: http://workplaceflexibility.bc.edu/ (accessed 9 July 2018). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  194. Trageser J, Hammer S & Fliedner J (2012) Altersrücktritt im Kontext der demographischen Entwicklung. BSV-Forschungsbericht Nr. 11/12. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  195. Truxillo DM, Cadiz DM & Hammer LB (2015) Supporting the Aging Workforce: A Review and Recommendations for Workplace Intervention Research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2(1): 351–381. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414–111435. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  196. Van den Berg PT & van der Velde MEG (2005) Relationships of Functional Flexibility with Individual and Work Factors. Journal of Business and Psychology 20(1): 111–129. DOI: 10.1007/s10869–005–6994–9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  197. Van Yperen NW & Wörtler B (2017) Blended Working and the Employability of Older Workers, Retirement Timing, and Bridge Employment. Work, Aging and Retirement 3(1): 102–108. DOI: 10.1093/workar/waw036. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  198. Van Yperen NW, Rietzschel EF & Jonge KMMD (2014) Blended Working: For Whom It May (Not) Work. PLOS ONE 9(7): e102921. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102921. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  199. Veth KN, Van der Heijden BIJM, Korzilius HPLM, et al. (2018) Bridge Over an Aging Population: Examining Longitudinal Relations Among Human Resource Management, Social Support, and Employee Outcomes Among Bridge Workers. Frontiers in Psychology 9. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00574. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  200. Wang M & Shultz KS (2010) Employee Retirement: A Review and Recommendations for Future Investigation. Journal of Management 36(1): 172–206. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309347957. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  201. Wang M, Zhan Y, Liu S, et al. (2008) Antecedents of bridge employment: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(4): 818–830. DOI: 10.1037/0021–9010.93.4.818. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  202. Wang M, Jex SM & Grosch J (2014) In: Retirement Decision Making. Available at: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199746521.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199746521-e-17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  203. Weichbrodt J, Tanner A, Josef B, et al. (2014) Die Entwicklung von Arbeitsflexibilität in Organisationen anhand des FlexWork-Phasenmodells. Wirtschaftspsychologie 4/2014: 11–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  204. Wöhrmann AM, Deller J & Wang M (2014) Postretirement Career Planning: Testing a Model Based on Social Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Career Development 41(5): 363–381. DOI: 10.1177/0894845313507749. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  205. Wrzesniewski A & Dutton JE (2001) Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work. The Academy of Management Review 26(2): 179–201. DOI: 10.2307/259118. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  206. Zeytinoglu IU, Cooke GB & Mann SL (2009) Flexibility: Whose Choice Is It Anyway? Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations 64(4): 555–574. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-229
  207. Backhaus/Kirsch (2015): Perspektiven des Berufsstandes der Wirtschaftsprüfer 2025, in: Baetge/Kirsch (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Rechnungslegung und Prüfung – Her-ausforderungen und Perspektiven : Beiträge und Diskussionen zum 30. Münsterischen Tages-gespräch der Münsteraner Gesprächskreises Rechnungslegung und Prüfung e.V. am 11. Juni 2015, S. 135–159, Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  208. Bax, M. (2015): Wirtschaftsprüfer haben gute Jobchancen, http://www.wiso-net.de/document/WWON__WW%2012755094, zugegriffen: 12. April 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  209. Bhaskar, K./Flower, J./Sellers, R. (2019): Disruption in the audit market : the future of the big four, London. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  210. Braun, S./Quick, R./Wolz, M. (2018): Prüferwechsel auf dem deutschen Prüfungsmarkt – Betreiben Unternehmen erfolgreich Opinion Shopping?, in: Die Unternehmung, Jg. 72, S. 255–284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  211. Breyer, F. (2015): Mikroökonomik – Eine Einführung, Berlin und Heidelberg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  212. Bruhn, M. (2005): Kooperation im Dienstleistungssektor, in: Zentes, J./Morschett B. (Hrsg.): Kooperationen, Allianzen und Netzwerke – Grundlagen – Ansätze – Perspektiven, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden, S. 1277–1302. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  213. Burg, T./ Klüber, J./Langenbrink, S./Pott, C. (2017): Industrie 4.0: Chancen und Risiken für die Wirtschaftsprüfung, in: WP-Praxis, Jg. 6, S. 122–130. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  214. Europäische Kommission (2005): Benutzerleitfaden zur Definition von KMU, http://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/79c0ce87-f4dc-11e6-8a35-01aa75ed71a1.0004.01/DOC_1, zugegriffen: 17. Januar 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  215. Feld, K./Kreisel, H./Baum, G. (2013): Bedeutung der IT für die Abschlussprüfung, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 66, S. 565–578. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  216. Friese, M. (1998): Kooperation als Wettbewerbsstrategie für Dienstleistungsunternehmen, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  217. Gantzel, K. (1962): Wesen und Begriff der mittelständischen Unternehmung, Köln und Opla-den. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  218. Gow, I./Kells, S. (2018): The Big Four : The Curious Past and Perilous Future of the Global Accounting Monopoly, Oakland. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  219. Günterberg, B./Wolter, H. (2002): Unternehmensgrößenstatistik 2001/2002 – Daten und Fak-ten –, Bonn, https://www.ifm-bonn.org//uploads/tx_ifmstudies/IfM-Materialien-157_2003.pdf, zugegriffen: 13.11.2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  220. Hardes, H./Uhly, A. (2007): Grundzüge der Volkswirtschaftslehre, 9. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  221. Hausmann, U. (2015): Personal halten und gewinnen in Steuerkanzleien, in: Deutsches Steu-errecht, Jg. 53, S. 1020–1024. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  222. Herdzina, K./Seiter, S. (2015): Einführung in die Mikroökonomik, 12. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  223. Heßler, A./Mosebach, P. (2013): Strategie und Marketing im Web 2.0 – Handbuch für Steu-erberater und Wirtschaftsprüfer. Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  224. Heuser, S./Quick, R./Schmidt, F. (2015): Die Anbieterkonzentration auf dem deutschen Prü-fungsmarkt – Eine empirische Untersuchung der Jahre 2010–2013, in: Die Unternehmung, Jg. 69, S. 81–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  225. Hossenfelder, J. (2016): Die digitale Transformation wirkt sich auf Portfolio und Organisation aus – Lünendonk®-Studie 2016: Wirtschaftsprüfungs- und Steuerberatungs-Gesellschaften in Deutschland, in: WP-Praxis, Jg. 5, S. 313–317. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  226. Hubert, F. (2015): VWL für BWLer, Herne. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  227. IFAC (2017): IFAC GLOBAL SMP SERVEY: 2016 RESULTS, http://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/2016-ifac-global-smp-survey-report-summary, zugegriffen: 12. Februar 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  228. IfM (2016): KMU-Definition des IfM Bonn, https://www.ifm-bonn.org/definitionen/kmu-definition-des-ifm-bonn/, zugegriffen: 17. Januar 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  229. IfM (2018): Mittelstandsdefinition des IfM Bonn, https://www.ifm-bonn.org/definitionen/mittelstandsdefinition-des-ifm-bonn/, zugegriffen: 16. Februar 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  230. Immerschitt, W./Stumpf, M. (2014): Employer Branding für KMU – Der Mittelstand als attrakti-ver Arbeitgeber, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  231. Jarillo, J. (1988): On Strategic Networks, in: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, S. 31–41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  232. Kempf, D. (2013): Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Trends in der IT, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 66, S. 579–585. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  233. Johnsy, J./Gisa, G. (2018): A Comparative Study On Recruitment & Selection Process In Big Four Accounting Firms, in: Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary, Vol. 03, S. 348–352. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  234. Kiesow, A./Thomas, O. (2016): Digitale Transformation der Abschlussprüfung, in: Die Wirt-schaftsprüfung, Jg. 70, S. 709–716. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  235. Klein/Naumann (2015): Wirtschaftsprüfung in einem sich wandelnden Umfeld: strategische Herausforderungen für den Berufsstand der Wirtschaftsprüfer, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 69, S. 561–569. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  236. Kolmar, M. (2017): Grundlagen der Mikroökonomik – Ein integrativer Ansatz, Berlin und Hei-delberg. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  237. Kozikowski, M./Schmid, P. (2017): Digitalisierung in der Wirtschaftsprüfungs- und Steuerbe-ratungspraxis, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 71, S. 458–464. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  238. Küting, K. (2000), Das deutsche Prüfungswesen in der Kritik, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zei-tung vom 23.2.2000, Jg. 45, S. 23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  239. Laschewski, C./Risse, M./Weinzierl, R. (2017): Anbieterkonzentration und prüfungsbezo-gene Spezialisierung auf dem Markt für die Abschlussprüfung kapitalmarktorientierter Unter-nehmen, in: Der Betrieb, Jg. 70, S. 1597–1606. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  240. Lenz, H./Schmidt, M. (1999): Das strategische Netzwerk als Organisationsform internationaler Prüfungs- und Beratungsunternehmen – die Entwicklung zur "Global Professional Services Firm", in: Engelhard, J./Sinz, E. (Hrsg.): Kooperation im Wettbewerb – Neue Formen und Gestaltungskonzepte im Zeichen von Globalisierung und Informationstechnologie; 61. wissen-schaftliche Jahrestagung des Verbandes der Hochschullehrer für Betriebswirtschaft e.V. 1999 in Bamberg, Wiesbaden, S. 113–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  241. Lesage, C./Ratzinger-Sakel, N.V.S./Kettunen, J. (2017): Consequences of the Abandon-ment of Mandatory Joint Audit: An Empirical Study of Audit Cost and Audit Quality Effects, in: European Accounting Review, Jg. 26, S. 311–339. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  242. Lieder, H./Goldshteyn, M. (2013): Effizienzsteigerung der Abschlussprüfung durch Daten-analyse, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 66, S. 586–595. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  243. Loitz, R. (2017): Künstliche Intelligenz für die Wirtschaftsprüfung auf dem Prüfstand – Künstli-che Intelligenz schafft neue Möglichkeiten für Wirtschaftsprüfer, in: Der Betrieb, Jg. 70, Nr. 39, S. M4–M5. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  244. Lombardi, D./Bloch, R./Vasarhelyi, M. (2014): The Future of Audit, in: Journal of Infor-mation Systems and Technology Management, Vol. 11, S. 21–32. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  245. Lünendonk. (2017): Lünendonk®-Studie 2017: Wirtschaftsprüfung und Steuerberatung in Deutschland – Umsätze – Märkte – Strukturen – Tendenzen – Honorare. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  246. Marten, K./Quick, R./Ruhnke, K. (2015): Wirtschaftsprüfung – Grundlagen des betriebswirt-schaftlichen Prüfungswesens nach nationalen und internationalen Normen, 5. Aufl., Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  247. Marten, K./Schultze, W. (1998): Konzentrationsentwicklungen auf dem deutschen und euro-päischen Prüfungsmarkt, in: Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Jg. 50, S. 360–386. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  248. Odenthal, R. (2017): Big Data und Abschlussprüfung – Datenanalysen im Kontext prüferischer Urteilsbildung, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 71, S. 546–554. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  249. Olney, M. (2014): Wiley-Schnellkurs Mikroökonomie, Weinheim. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  250. Petersen, K./Zwirner, C./Boecker, C. (2010): Der Wirtschaftsprüfungsmarkt in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Analyse in DAX, MDAX, SDAX und TecDAX, in: Internationale und kapital-marktorientierte Rechnungslegung, Jg. 10, S. 217–224. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  251. Peterson, J. (2017): Count down : the past, present and uncertain future of the big four ac-counting firms by Jim Peterson, Bingley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  252. Pfohl, H. (2013): Abgrenzung der Klein- und Mittelbetriebe von Großbetrieben, in: Pfohl, H. (Hrsg.): Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Mittel- und Kleinbetriebe – Größenspezifische Probleme und Möglichkeiten zu ihrer Lösung, 5. Aufl., Berlin, S. 1–26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  253. Pindyck, R./Rubinfeld, D. (2015): Mikroökonomie, 8. Aufl., Hallbergmoos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  254. Prüfungsstelle für das Wirtschaftsprüfungsexamen bei der Wirtschaftsprüferkammer (2017): Berufsexamina 2016 – Bericht der Prüfungsstelle für das Wirtschaftsprüfungsexamen bei der Wirtschaftsprüferkammer, https://www.wpk.de/uploads/tx_templavoila/WPK-Bericht_Pruefungsstelle_2016.pdf, zugegriffen: 12. April 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  255. Quick, R./Sattler, M. (2011): Das Erfordernis der Umsatzunabhängigkeit und die Konzentrati-on auf dem deutschen Markt für Abschlussprüferleistungen, in: Zeitschrift für Betriebswirt-schaft, Jg. 81, S. 61–98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  256. Ramirez, C. (2012): How Big Four Audit Firms Control Standard-Setting in Accounting and Auditing, in: Huault, I./ Richard, C. (Hrsg.): Finance: The Discreet Regulator, London, S. 40–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  257. Rega, I./Teipel, G. (2016): Digitalisierung in der Wirtschaft und im Berufsstand, in: Die Wirt-schaftsprüfung, Jg. 70, S. 39–45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  258. Roland Berger Strategy Constultants & BDI (2015): Die Digitale Transformation der Indu-strie. Was sie bedeutet. Wer gewinnt. Was jetzt zu tun ist. Eine europäische Studie von Roland Berger Strategy Consultants im Auftrag des BDI, https://bdi.eu/publikation/news/die-digitale-transformation-der-industrie/, zugegriffen: 16. Januar 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  259. Schmidt, A./Kiefer, C. (2005): Kooperationen zwischen mittelständischen Unternehmen, in: Zentes, J./Swoboda, B./Morschett, D. (Hrsg.): Kooperationen, Allianzen und Netzwerke – Grundlagen – Ansätze – Perspektiven, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden, 1357–1381. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  260. Scholz, C. (2014): Grundzüge des Personalmanagements, 2. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  261. Schruff, L. (1973): Der Wirtschaftsprüfer und seine Pflichtprüfungsmandate – eine Marktstruk-turuntersuchung, Düsseldorf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  262. Sunder, S. (2003): Politisch-ökonomische Betrachtungen zum Zusammenbruch der Rech-nungslegung in den USA, in: Die Wirtschaftsprüfung, Jg. 56, S. 141–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  263. Sydow, J. (1992): Strategische Netzwerke – Evolution und Organisation, Wiesbaden. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  264. Varian, H. (2016): Grundzüge der Mikroökonomik, 9. Aufl., Berlin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  265. Velte, P. (2011): Empirische Evidenz der Anbieterkonzentration am deutschen Prüfungsmarkt, in: Internationale und kapitalmarktorientierte Rechnungslegung, Jg. 11, S. 594–599. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  266. Velte, P./Drews, P. (2018): Herausforderungen in der Wirtschaftsprüfung durch den Einsatz von Big-Data-Technologien, in: Der Betrieb, Jg. 71, S. 2581–2585. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  267. Wild, A. (2013): Der Markt für Wirtschaftsprüfung in Deutschland, Tübingen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  268. Winkeljohann, N. (2017): PWC will schneller beraten und maschinell prüfen, in: Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 12.10.2017, S. 25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  269. Winkeljohann, N./Kayser, H. (2015): Von der Prüfung zur intelligenten Analyse, in: Frankfur-ter Allgemeine Zeitung vom 31.3.2015, Jg. 76, S. V4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  270. Woll, A. (2011): Volkswirtschaftslehre, 16. Aufl., München. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  271. Worret, D. (2016): Are "Big Four audits" really better? : some remarks on the "Big Four dichot-omy" in the German audit market, in: International journal of critical accounting, Vol. 8., S. 246–279. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  272. WPK (2017): Liste der Abschlussprüfer und Prüfungsgesellschaften für die Durchführung von Auswahlverfahren (Artikel 16 Absatz 2 EU-Verordnung Nr. 537/2014), Stand vom 16. November 2017, https://www.wpk.de/berufsregister/pdf/abschlusspruefer, zugegriffen: 16. November 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250
  273. WPK (2018): Mitgliederstatistik der WPK – Stand 1. Januar 2018, https://www.wpk.de/fileadmin/documents/WPK/Organisation/WPK-Statistiken_Januar_2018.pdf, zugegriffen: 27. April 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/0042-059X-2019-3-250

Latest issues

Die Unternehmung
See all issues
Cover der Ausgabe: Die Unternehmung Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3
Ausgabe Full access
Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice
Jahrgang 79 (2025), Heft 3
Cover der Ausgabe: Die Unternehmung Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 4
Ausgabe Partial access
Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice
Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 4
Cover der Ausgabe: Die Unternehmung Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 3
Ausgabe Partial access
Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice
Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 3
Cover der Ausgabe: Die Unternehmung Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 2
Ausgabe Partial access
Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice
Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 2
Cover der Ausgabe: Die Unternehmung Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 1
Ausgabe Partial access
Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice
Jahrgang 78 (2024), Heft 1

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS

Send suggestion