Cover of book: The Stoics and the State
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

The Stoics and the State

Theory - Practice - Context
Authors:
Series:
Staatsverständnisse, Volume 105
Publisher:
 16.03.2018

Summary

Was verstanden Stoiker unter einer polis und Staatlichkeit? Was passiert, wenn ihre Ideen unter wechselnden historischen Bedingungen gelebt und neu gedacht werden? The Stoics and the State verfolgt diese Fragen mit detaillierter, philologischer Quellenkritik, präziser Konzeptanalyse sowie weit ausholender thematischer und diachronischer Kontextualisierung. Der systematische Teil behandelt Definitionen, Aspekte der Staatlichkeit (Staatsgebiet, Institutionen, Volk und Staatsidee) und das für den stoischen Staat konstitutive Gemeinsame Gesetz. Die diachronische Darstellung von Zeno bis Marcus Aurelius zeigt die Anwendung der Theorie auf real existierende Gemeinwesen: ihre Bewertung, ihre Entstehung und die politische Praxis. Beispiele moderner Rezeption von Justus Lipsius bis Martha C. Nussbaum verdeutlichen die Eigenheiten der stoischen Staatstheorie, nicht zuletzt ihre Grundlegung in einem Menschbild, das unsere Natur nicht nur als politisch sondern als sozial und wohltätig begreift.

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2018
Publication date
16.03.2018
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-2843-5
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-7448-5
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Staatsverständnisse
Volume
105
Language
English
Pages
263
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 12
    1. A State? No access
    2. The Analytical Grid No access
    1. The State of Our Sources No access
    2. Chrysostom: “Human Beings Administrated by Law” No access
      1. “Neither Expugnable nor Subjugable” No access
      2. The Wise State vs. the People as an Organized Group No access
    4. Cleanthes: A Construction for Refuge and Justice No access
    5. Arius Didymus: Dwelling and Organized Group No access
      1. Gymnasia No access
      2. Temples No access
      3. Justice and the Urban Center No access
        1. Expansional Social Attachment No access
        2. Essential Social Attachment No access
      2. The Cosmos as a Dwelling Made for Gods and Humans No access
    1. The Cosmic Home as a World State No access
      1. The Citizen of the Cosmos in Therapy and Exhortation No access
      2. A Cosmic Model-State No access
      1. Household Terminology in Stoicism No access
      2. Polis or Politeia? No access
      3. The Cosmic Disposition: Fate, Nature, and Providence No access
      4. The Cosmic Constitution and a Rational Animal’s End No access
      1. Law as a Prescriptive and Prohibitive Body No access
      2. Fate and Seed-Description (Logos Spermatikos) No access
    2. Justice and the Cosmic Disposition No access
    3. Are Stoic Laws Rules? No access
    4. Experience, Concepts, and Patterns in Nature No access
    1. Reason as a Prerequisite for Citizenship No access
      1. Hierarchies in the World State No access
      2. Is God a Citizen Too? No access
      1. Right Reason No access
      2. Reason Twisted No access
      1. Women No access
      2. Slaves No access
      3. Exiles, Rustics, and Feral Persons No access
      4. Children No access
      1. The Erotic Efforts of Sages No access
      2. Eros and Concord No access
    6. Becoming a Citizen: A Rational Animal’s End and the State Objective No access
      1. The Reality of the Common Law No access
      2. Individual Polities and the Primacy of the Law No access
    2. Objectives of Particular States and Best Constitutions No access
      1. The Earliest Humans: “Fresh from the Gods” No access
      2. Technology No access
      3. A Golden Age or a Lucky Age? No access
      4. Early Political Philosophy No access
      5. Tyrants and Legislation No access
    1. Is Zeno’s Society of Equals a Democracy? No access
      1. Historical Context and Theory No access
      2. Early Stoics in Politics No access
      1. Engagement with Monarchy and Monarchs No access
      2. Distance and Mediation No access
      1. Adaptive Agency No access
      2. In Defense of a Contemplative Life: The Evidence in Seneca No access
      3. Incurable Polities and Progressor Polities No access
      4. Just by Nature No access
      5. Philosophy as Legislation No access
    1. The Middle Stoics No access
      1. The Body Politic in Seneca’s De Clementia No access
      2. Epictetus on the Emperor as a Source of Enslaving Desires No access
        1. Marcus Conceptualizes His Status as Emperor No access
        2. A Sociable and Political Animal in the World State No access
        3. Ruling in Rome No access
      1. The Stoic Opposition and Marcus’ Political Dream No access
        1. A Change of Mind No access
        2. A New Start No access
        3. A New Elite of Equals: The Network of Progressor Friends No access
      1. Public Evils and Contingent Laws in De Constantia No access
      2. Human Selfishness and Protective State Power in the Politica No access
      1. Anthropology No access
      2. State, Law, and Institutions No access
      1. Human Dignity and Human Rights No access
      2. Capabilities vs. Functions: Chrysippus’ Modal Logic No access
      3. Quietistic Disregard for Human Vulnerability? No access
      4. The Common Law, Cultural Diversity, and Minimal Consensus No access
      5. In Conclusion: Radical Evil or Innate Love of Others? No access
  12. Literature No access 231 - 246
  13. Index of Primary Sources Cited No access 247 - 260
  14. Index of Selected Greek and Latin Terms No access 261 - 263

Bibliography (286)

  1. Abel, K., 1964. Poseidonios und Senecas Trostschrift an Marcia (dial. 6,24,5 ff.). Rheinisches Museum, Vol. 107, pp. 221-260. Open Google Scholar
  2. Alessandrelli, M. & Ranocchia, G., 2017. Scrittore stoico anonimo, Opera incerta: PHerc. 1020, coll. 104-112: Edizione, introduzione e commento. ILIESI-CNR: http://www.iliesi.cnr.it/pubblicazioni/Testi-01-Alessandrelli_Ranocchia.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  3. Alesse, F., 1997. Panezio di Rodi: Testimonianze: Edizione, traduzione e commento. Napoli: Bibliopolis. Open Google Scholar
  4. Algra, K., 2009. Stoic Philosophical Theology and Graeco-Roman Religion. In: R. Salles, ed. God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 224-251. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556144.003.0010
  5. Annas, J., 1989. Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property. In: M. T. Griffin & J. Barnes, ed. Philosophia Togata. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 151-173. Open Google Scholar
  6. Armisen-Marchetti, M., 1989. Sapientiae facies: Étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar
  7. Asmis, E., 2008. Cicero on Natural Law and the Laws of the State. Classical Antiquity, Vol. 27, pp. 1-33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/ca.2008.27.1.1
  8. Auberger, J., 2016. Strabon d’Amasée. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques: VI: De Sabinillus à Tyrsénos. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 602-612. Open Google Scholar
  9. Badian, E., 1958. Alexander the Great and the Unity of Mankind. Historia, Vol. 7, pp. 125-144. Open Google Scholar
  10. Baldry, H. C., 1959. Zeno’s Ideal State. Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 79, pp. 3-15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/627917
  11. Baldry, H. C., 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735851
  12. Banateanu, A., 2001. La théorie stoïcienne de l’amitié: Essai de reconstruction. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bees, R., 2004. Die Oikeiosislehre der Stoa: I. Rekonstruktion ihres Inhalts. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bees, R., 2005. Die Kulturentstehungslehre des Poseidonios: Wege zu ihrer Rekonstruktion. Antike & Abendland, Vol. 51, pp. 13-29. Open Google Scholar
  15. Bees, R., 2011. Zenons Politeia. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004192027.i-394
  16. Bénatouïl, T., 2009. Les stoïciens III: Musonius - Epictète - Marc Aurèle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bénatouïl, T., 2016. Stoicism and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy. In: J. Sellars, ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 360-373. Open Google Scholar
  18. Benhabib, S., 2008. The Legitimacy of Human Rights. Daedalus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 94-104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/daed.2008.137.3.94
  19. Bickel, E., 1959. Kant und Seneca: Der bestirnte Himmel über mir und das moralische Gesetz in mir. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Vol. 102, pp. 289-292. Open Google Scholar
  20. Birley, A. R., 2000. Marcus Aurelius: A Biography. Rpt. of 2nd ed. 1987. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  21. Blom, H. & Winkel, L., 2001/2002. Grotius and the Stoa: Introduction. Grotiana, Vol. 22-23, pp. 3-20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/016738312X13397477910387
  22. Bobzien, S., 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  23. Bobzien, S., 1999. Logic: II The ‘Megarics’; III The Stoics (sections 1-7). In: K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld & M. Schofield, ed. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philoso¬phy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83-157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.006
  24. Boegehold, A. L. et al., 1995. The Athenian Agora, Vol. 28: The Lawcourts at Athens: Sites, Buildings, Equipment, Procedure, and Testimonia. Athens: The American School of Clas¬sical Studies at Athens. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3602008
  25. Boeri, M. D. & Salles, R., 2014. Los Filósofos Estoicos: Ontología, Lógica, Física y Ética: Traducción, comentaria filosófico y edición anotada de los principales textos griegos y latinos. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  26. Bonazzi, M. & Helmig, C. ed., 2007. Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Open Google Scholar
  27. Bonazzi, M. & Opsomer, J. ed., 2009. The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Paris; Louvain: Namur; Walpole: Éditions Peeters; Société des Études Classiques. Open Google Scholar
  28. Borkenau, F., 1934. Der Übergang vom feudalen zum bürgerlichen Weltbild: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie der Manufakturperiode. Paris: Alcan. Open Google Scholar
  29. Boys-Stones, G., 1998. Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City. Classical Quar¬terly, Vol. 48, pp. 168-174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/cq/48.1.168
  30. Boys-Stones, G., 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  31. Brandt, R., 2007. Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Hamburg: Meiner. Open Google Scholar
  32. Braund, S. M., 2009. Seneca, De clementia. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  33. Brennan, T., 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  34. Brittain, C., 2005. Common Sense: Concepts, Definition and Meaning in and out of the Stoa. In: D. Frede & B. Inwood, ed. Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164-209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482526.008
  35. Brooke, C., 2012. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rous¬seau. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  36. Brouwer, R., 2011. On Law and Equity: The Stoic View. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Vol. 128, pp. 17-38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.2011.128.1.17
  37. Brouwer, R., 2014. The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  38. Brown, E., 2006. Hellenistic Cosmpolitanism. In: M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin, ed. A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Malden; Oxford; Carlton: Blackwell, pp. 549-558. Open Google Scholar
  39. Brown, E., 2009. The Emergence of Natural Law and the Cosmopolis. In: S. Salkever, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 331-364. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521867535.013
  40. Brown, G. W. & Held, D., 2010. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge; Malden: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10402651003751537
  41. Brunschwig, J., 2005. Sur deux notions de l’éthique stoïcienne: De la ‘reserve’ au ‘renverse¬ment’. In: J. Gourinat & G. Romeyer-Dherbey, ed. Les stoïciens. Paris: Vrin, pp. 335-356. Open Google Scholar
  42. Brunt, P. A., 2013. Studies in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  43. Cartledge, P. & Edge, M., 2009. ‘Rights,’ Individuals, and Communities in Ancient Greece. In: R. K. Balot, ed. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 149-163. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/9781444310344.ch10
  44. Caspar, T. W., 2011. Recovering the Ancient View of Founding: A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Lanham: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  45. Christes, J., 2007. Populus und res publica in Ciceros Schrift ‘De re publica.’ In: E. Richter, R. Voigt & H. König, ed. Res Publica und Demokratie: Die Bedeutung von Cicero für das heutige Staatsverständnis. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 85-104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783845200200-85
  46. Cicero, 2001. On Moral Ends, ed. J. Annas; transl. R. Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803659.012
  47. Colish, M. L., 2014. Seneca on Acting against Conscience. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 95-110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.95
  48. Costa, S., 2013. “Quod olim fuerat” – La rappresentazione del passato in Seneca prosatore. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Olms. Open Google Scholar
  49. Daniélou, J., 2014. Philo of Alexandria. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co. (= Philon d’Alex¬andrie. Paris: Fayard, 1958). Open Google Scholar
  50. Dawson, D., 1992. Cities of the Gods: Communist Utopias in Greek Thought. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  51. De Pietro, M., 2014. Having the Right to Philosophize: A New Reading of Seneca, De Vita Beata 1.1.-6.2. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 343-367. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.343
  52. Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R., 2004. Il cielo e il soffitto: Speculazione filosofica e realtà romana nell’epistola 90 di Seneca. In: L. de Finis, ed. Colloquio su Seneca. Trento: Trento Asso¬ciazione italiana di cultura classica, pp. 65-88. Open Google Scholar
  53. Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R., 2014. Freedom in Seneca: Some Reflections on the Relationship between Philosophy and Politics, Public and Private Life. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wild¬berger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 167-187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.167
  54. Devine, F. E., 1970. Stoicism on the Best Regime. Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 31, pp. 323-336. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2708509
  55. Dionigi, I., 1983. Lucio Anneo Seneca, De otio (Dial. VIII): Testo e apparato critico, con introduzione, versione e commento. Bescia: Paideia. Open Google Scholar
  56. Dorandi, T., 1982. Filodemo. Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339). Cronache Ercolanesi, Vol. 12, pp. 91-133. Open Google Scholar
  57. Dorandi, T., 1994. Storia dei filosofi: La Stoa da Zenone a Panezio (PHerc. 1018): Edizione, traduzione e commento. Leiden; New York; Köln: Brill. Open Google Scholar
  58. Dorandi, T., 1999. Antigone de Caryste, Fragments: Texte établi et traduit. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar
  59. Doyle, D. & Torralba, J. M., 2016. Kant and Stoic Ethics. In: J. Sellars, ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 270-284. Open Google Scholar
  60. Dyck, A. R., 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar
  61. Dyck, A. R., 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor: University of Michi¬gan Press. Open Google Scholar
  62. Edelstein, L. & Kidd, I. G., 1989. Posidonius. I: The Fragments. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cam¬bridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  63. Epictetus, 1995. The Discourses. The Handbook. Fragments, transl. E. Carter, revised by R. Hard. London; Vermont: Dent; Tuttle (Everyman). Open Google Scholar
  64. Erler, M., 2007. Platon. Ueberweg Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: Antike 2/2. Basel: Schwabe. Open Google Scholar
  65. Erskine, A., 1990. The Hellenistic Stoa: Political Thought and Action. Ithaca: Cornell Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar
  66. Eusebius, 1987. Eusèbe de Césarée. La préparation évangelique, Livres XIV-XV: Introduc¬tion, texte grec, traduction et annotation, ed. and transl. E. des Places. Paris: Les éditions du CERF (Sources Chrétiennes 338). Open Google Scholar
  67. Farquharson, A. S. L., 1944. The Meditations of the Emperor Marcus Antoninus: Edited with Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  68. Feldman, N., 2007. Cosmpolitan Law? The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 116, pp. 1022-1070. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20455749
  69. Follet, S., 1994. Aristocréon. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques I: Abam(m)on à Axiothéa. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 386-389. Open Google Scholar
  70. Fontanella, F., 2012. Politica e diritto naturale nel De legibus di Cicerone. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. Open Google Scholar
  71. Ford, C. A., 1996. Preaching Propriety to Princes: Grotius, Lipsius, and Neo-Stoic Interna¬tional Law. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, pp. 313-366. Open Google Scholar
  72. Forschner, M., 2003. Philosophie und Politik: Dions philosophische Botschaft. In: H.-G. Nesselrath et al. Dion von Prusa, Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ordnung: Die Borysthenes-Rede: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 128-156. Open Google Scholar
  73. Frede, M., 1999. Stoic Epistemology. In: K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld & M. Schofield, ed. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295-322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.010
  74. Gaca, K. L., 2000. Early Stoic Eros: The Sexual Ethics of Zeno and Chrysippus and Their Evaluation of the Greek Erotic Tradition. Apeiron, Vol. 33, pp. 207-23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2000.33.3.207
  75. Gaca, K. L., 2003. Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics, and Political Reform in Greek Phi¬losophy and Early Christianity. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520235991.003.0011
  76. Gauly, B. M., 2004. Senecas Naturales quaestiones: Naturphilosophie für die römische Kai¬serzeit. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar
  77. Gerson, L. P. & Inwood, B., 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. 2nd ed. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett. Open Google Scholar
  78. Giannantoni, G., 1988. Cinici e stoici su Alessandro Magno. In: G. Casertano, ed. I filosofi e il potere nella società e nella cultura antiche. Napoli: Guida, pp. 75-87. Open Google Scholar
  79. Gill, C., 2000. Stoic Writers of the Imperial Era. In: C. Rowe & M. Schofield, ed. The Cam¬bridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 597-615. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521481366.031
  80. Gill, C., 2005. Competing Readings of Stoic Emotions. In: R. Salles, ed. Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Clar¬endon Press, pp. 445-470. Open Google Scholar
  81. Gill, C., 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  82. Gloyn, E., 2016. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  83. Goeken, J., 2012. Aelius Aristide et la rhétorique de l’hymne en prose. Turnhout: Brepols. Open Google Scholar
  84. Goulet-Gazé, M.-O., ed., 2011. Études sur la théorie stoïcienne de l’action. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar
  85. Gourinat, J.-B., 2011. Aëtius et Arius Didyme sources de Stobée. In: G. Reydams-Schils, ed. Thinking Through Excerpts: Studies on Stobaeus. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 143-200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1484/M.MON-EB.4.00099
  86. Gourinat, J.-B., 2012. Persaïos de Kition. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques: Va: De Paccius à Plotin. Paris: CRNS Éditions, pp. 234-243. Open Google Scholar
  87. Gourinat, J.-B., ed., 2016. L’éthique du stoïcien Hiéroclès. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Uni¬versitaires du Septentrion. Open Google Scholar
  88. Graver, M. R., 2002. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4: Translated and with Commentary. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226305196.001.0001
  89. Graver, M. R., 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
  90. Graver, M. R., 2014. Honeybee Reading and Self-Scripting: Seneca’s 84th Epistle. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 269-293. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.269
  91. Graver, M. R., 2016a. Honor and the Honorable: Cato’s Discourse in De Finibus 3. In: J. Annas & G. Betegh, ed. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cam¬bridge University Press, pp. 118-146. Open Google Scholar
  92. Graver, M. R., 2016b. The Emotional Intelligence of Epicureans: Doctrinalism and Adaptation in Seneca’s Epistles. In: G. D. Williams & K. Volk, ed. Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 192-210. Open Google Scholar
  93. Griffin, M. T., 1992. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  94. Griffin, M. T., 2013. Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199245482.book.1
  95. Guérard, C. & Goulet, R., 2016. Sphaïros le Borysthénite RE3. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques VI: De Sabinillus à Tyrsénos. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 540-545. Open Google Scholar
  96. Gueye, C. M., 2006. Late Stoic Cosmopolitanism: Foundations and Relevance. Heidelberg: Winter. Open Google Scholar
  97. Güremen, R., Hammerstaedt, J. & Morel, P.-M. ed., 2017. Diogenes of Oinoanda: Epicure¬anism and Philosophical Debate. Diogène d'Œnoanda: Épicurisme et controverses. Leu¬ven: Leuven University Press. Open Google Scholar
  98. Haake, M., 2004. Documentary Evidence, Literary Forgery, or Manipulation of Historical Documents? Diogenes Laertius and an Athenian Honorary Decree for Zeno of Citium. Classical Quarterly, Vol. 54, pp. 470-483. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/clquaj/bmh053
  99. Haake, M., 2007. Der Philosoph in der Stadt: Untersuchungen zur öffentlichen Rede über Philosophen und Philosophie in den hellenistischen Poleis. München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  100. Haake, M., 2013. Illustrating, Documenting, Making-Believe: The Use of Psephismata in Hellenistic Biographers of Philosophers. In: P. Liddel & P. Low, ed. Inscriptions and Their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79-124. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665747.003.0004
  101. Habicht, C., 1994. Athen in hellenistischer Zeit. München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar
  102. Habicht, C., 1997. Athens from Alexander to Antony. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  103. Habinek, T., 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  104. Habinek, T., 2000. Seneca’s Renown: Gloria, Claritudo, and the Replication of the Roman Elite. Classical Antiquity, Vol. 19, pp. 264-303. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/25011122
  105. Hadas-Lebel, M., 2012. Philo of Alexandria: A Thinker in the Jewish Diaspora. Leiden; Bos¬ton: Brill (= Philon d’Alexandrie: un penseur en diaspora. Paris: Fayard, 2003). Open Google Scholar
  106. Hadot, I., 2014. Getting to Goodness: Reflections on Chapter 10 of Brad Inwood, Reading Seneca. In: J. Wildberger & M. L. Colish, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 9-41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.9
  107. Hadot, P., 1992. Introduction aux ‘Pensées’ de Marc Aurèle: La citatelle intérieure. Paris: Fayard. Open Google Scholar
  108. Hahm, D. E., 1990. The Ethical Doxography of Arius Didymus. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Vol. II, 36.4, pp. 2935-3052. 3234-43. Open Google Scholar
  109. Hahm, D. E., 1992a. Diogenes Laertius VII: On the Stoics. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Vol. II, 36.6, pp. 4076-182. Open Google Scholar
  110. Hahm, D. E., 1992b. A Neglected Stoic Argument for Human Responsibility. Illinois Classi¬cal Studies, Vol. 17, pp. 23-48. Open Google Scholar
  111. Hammerstaedt, J. & Smith, M. F., 2014. The Epicurean Inscription of Diogenes of Oinoanda: Ten Years of New Discoveries and Research. Bonn: Habelt. Open Google Scholar
  112. Harding, P. E., 2015. Athens Transformed, 404-262 BC: From Popular Sovereignty to the Dominion of the Elite. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  113. Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, R. W. & Sheppard, A. ed., 2010. Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato. London: Institute of Classical Studies. Open Google Scholar
  114. Hill, L., 2000. The Two Republicae of the Roman Stoics: Can a Cosmpolite Be a Patriot? Citizenship Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 65-79. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/136210200110030
  115. Hine, H. M., 2006. Rome, the Cosmos, and the Emperor in Seneca’s Natural Questions. Jour¬nal of Roman Studies, Vol. 96, pp. 42-72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.3815/000000006784016224
  116. Horn, C., 2008. Kant und die Stoiker. In: B. Neymeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 2, pp. 1081-1104. Open Google Scholar
  117. Hülser, K., 1987. Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker: Neue Sammlung der Texte mit deutscher Übersetzung und Kommentaren. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. Open Google Scholar
  118. Inwood, B., 1999. Rule and Reasoing in Stoic Ethics. In: K. Ierodiakonou, ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 95-127. Open Google Scholar
  119. Inwood, B., 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  120. Inwood, B., 2007. Seneca. Selected Philosophical Letters: Translation with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  121. Inwood, B., 2014. Ethics After Aristotle. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674369788
  122. Inwood, B., 2016. The Voice of Nature. In: J. Annas & G. Betegh, ed. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147-166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871396.007
  123. Jellinek, G., 1900. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Häring. Open Google Scholar
  124. Jessop, B., 2016. The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Polity. Open Google Scholar
  125. Jones, M., 2014. Seneca’s Letters to Lucilius: Hypocrisy as a Way of Life. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 393-429. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.393
  126. Jong, A. d., 2003. Dions Magierhymnen: Zoroastrischer Mythos oder griechische Phantasie? In: H.-G. Nesselrath et al. Dion von Prusa, Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ord¬nung: Die Borysthenes-Rede: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 157-178. Open Google Scholar
  127. Kaufmann, S., 2008. Die stoisch-ciceronische Naturrechtslehre und ihre Rezeption bis Rous¬seau. In: B. Neyrmeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 1, pp. 229-292. Open Google Scholar
  128. Kidd, I. G., 1988. Posidonius: II. The Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press. Open Google Scholar
  129. Klessinger, H., 2008. Spinozas Stoizismus. In: B. Neymeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik: Eine Kul¬turgeschichte von der Antike bis zur Moderne. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 2, pp. 997-1016. Open Google Scholar
  130. Konstan, D., 2009. Cosmopolitan Traditions. In: R. K. Balot, ed. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 473-484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/9781444310344.ch30
  131. Kühn, W., 2011. L’attachement à soi et aux autres. In: M. Goulet-Cazé, ed. Études sur la théorie stoïcienne de l’action. Paris: Vrin, pp. 237-366. Open Google Scholar
  132. Küppers, J., 1996. ‘Kosmosschau’ und virtus in den Philosophica Senecas. Antike & Abendland, Vol. 42, pp. 57-75. Open Google Scholar
  133. Lagrée, J., 2010. Le néostoïcisme. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar
  134. Lana, I., 1996. Pingue otium et arbitrium sui temporis … (Sénèque, epist. LXXIII, 10). In: J. André, ed. Les loisirs et l’héritage de la culture classique (Dijon, 27-31 août 1993). Brux¬elles: Latomus, pp. 425-433. Open Google Scholar
  135. Laurand, V., 2005. La politique stoïcienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar
  136. Laurand, V., 2014. Stoïcisme et lien social: Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus. Paris: Classiques Garnier. Open Google Scholar
  137. Lausberg, M., 1970. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Fragmenten. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  138. Lee, M. V., 2006. Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  139. Lendon, J. E., 1997. Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  140. Lindberg, B., 2011. Stoicism in Political Humanism and Natural Law. In: E. De Bom, M. Janssens, T. Van Houdt & J. Papy, ed. (Un)masking the Realities of Power: Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 73-93. Open Google Scholar
  141. Lintott, A., 1997. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution at Rome. In: J. Barnes & M. T. Griffin, ed. Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 70-85. Open Google Scholar
  142. Lipsius, J., 2004. Politica: Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction: Edited with Trans¬lation and Introduction, ed. and transl. J. Waszink. Assen: Royal Van Corcum. Open Google Scholar
  143. Lipsius, J., 2011. Concering Constancy, ed. and transl. R. V. Young. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Open Google Scholar
  144. Long, A. A., ed., 1971. Problems in Stoicism. London: The Athlone Press. Open Google Scholar
  145. Long, A. A., 2002. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  146. Long, A. A., 2003. Stoicism in the Philosophical Tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler. In: B. Inwood, ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-392. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052177005X.016
  147. Long, A. A., 2008a. Philo on Stoic Physics. In: F. Alesse, ed. Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 121-140. Open Google Scholar
  148. Long, A. A., 2008b. The Concept of the Cosmopolitan in Greek & Roman Thought. Daeda¬lus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 50-58. Open Google Scholar
  149. Long, A. A., 2012. The Self in the Meditations. In: M. v. Ackeren, ed. A Companion to Mar¬cus Aurelius. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 465-480. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/9781118219836.ch30
  150. Long, A. A. & Sedley, D., ed., 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  151. Lorenz, H., 2011. Posidonius on the Nature and Treatment of the Emotions. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 40, pp. 189-211. Open Google Scholar
  152. Malaspina, E., 2003. La teoria politica de De clementia: un inevitabile fallimento? In: A. De Vivo & E. Lo Cascio, ed. Seneca uomo politico e l’età di Claudio e di Nerone: Atti del Convegno internazionale (Capri 25-27 marzo 1999). Bari: Edipuglia, pp. 139-157. Open Google Scholar
  153. Malaspina, E., 2004. L. Annaei Senecae De clementia libri duo: Prolegomeni, testo critico e commento. 2nd ed. Alessandria: D’Orso. Open Google Scholar
  154. Malaspina, E., 2009. La Clemenza: Introduzione. In: L. de Biasi, A. Ferrero, E. Malaspina & D. Vottero, ed. Lucio Anneo Seneca: La Clemenza. Apocolocintosi. Epigrammi. Fram¬menti. Torino: UTET, pp. 9-101. Open Google Scholar
  155. Malitz, J., 1983. Die Historien des Poseidonios. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar
  156. Malitz, J., 1985. Helvidius Priscus und Vespasian: Zur Geschichte der ‘stoischen’ Senatsopposition. Hermes, Vol. 113, pp. 231-246. Open Google Scholar
  157. Mann, C. & Scholz, P. ed., 2012. ‘Demokratie’ im Hellenismus: Von der Herrschaft des Volkes zur Herrschaft der Honoratioren? Mainz: Verlag Antike. Open Google Scholar
  158. Mansfeld, J., 1983. Techne: A New Fragment of Chrysippus. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 57-65. Open Google Scholar
  159. Mansfeld, J., 1986. Diogenes Laertius on Stoic Philosophy. Elenchos, Vol. 7, pp. 295-382. Open Google Scholar
  160. Mansfeld, J., 1999. Sources. In: K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld & M. Schofield, ed. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.002
  161. Mansfeld, J., 2001. Plato, Pythagoras, Aristotle, the Peripatetics, the Stoics, and Thales and His Followers ‘On Causes’. In: A. Brancacci, ed. La filosofia in età imperiale: Le schuole e le tradizione filosofiche: Atti del colloquio, Roma, 17-19 Giugno 1999. Napoli: Biblio¬polis, pp. 16-68. Open Google Scholar
  162. Marcus Aurelius, 1987. Ad se ipsum libri XII, ed. J. Dalfen. Leipzig: Teubner. Open Google Scholar
  163. Marcus Aurelius, 2006. Meditations, transl. M. Hammond. Introduction and Comments by D. Clay. London: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  164. Marcus Aurelius, 2011. Meditations with Selected Correspondence, transl. R. Hard. Introduc¬tion and Notes by C. Gill. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  165. McConnell, S., 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press. Open Google Scholar
  166. Mikeš, V., 2016. Le paradoxe stoïcien: Liberté de l’action déterminée. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar
  167. Miller, J., 2003. Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on Moral Deliberation. In: J. Miller & B. Inwood, ed. Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 116-140. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498275.009
  168. Miller, J., 2016. Spinoza and the Stoics. In: J. Sellars, ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 218-225. Open Google Scholar
  169. Miller, P. N., 2002. Nazis and Neostoics: Otto Brunner and Gerhard Oestreich before and after the Second World War. Past & Present, Vol. 176, pp. 144-186. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/past/176.1.144
  170. Mitsis, P., 1999. The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights. In: K. Ierodiakonou, ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 153-177. Open Google Scholar
  171. Moles, J. L., 1996. Cynic Cosmopolitanism. In: R. B. Branham & M. Goulet-Gazé, ed. The Cynics. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, pp. 105-120. Open Google Scholar
  172. Morford, M., 1991. Stoics and Neostoics: Rubens and the Circle of Lipsius. Princeton: Prince¬ton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  173. Morford, M., 1993. Tacitean Prudentia and the Doctrines of Justus Lipsius. In: T. J. Luce & A. J. Woodman, ed. Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 129-151. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9781400863365.129
  174. Nesselrath, H.-G., 2003. Einführung in die Schrift; Text und Übersetzung. In: H.-G. Nesselrath et al. Dion von Prusa, Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ordnung: Die Borysthenes-Rede: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Darm¬stadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 11-92. Open Google Scholar
  175. Newmyer, S. T., 2017. The Animal and the Human in Ancient and Modern Thought: The ‘Man Alone of Animals’ Concept. New York; London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  176. Nicols, J., 2014. Civic Patronage in the Roman Empire. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar
  177. Nikulin, D., 2016. Diogenes the Comic, or How to Tell the Truth in the Face of a Tyrant. In: C. Arruzza & D. Nikulin, ed. Philosophy and Politica Power in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 114-133. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004324626_007
  178. Nussbaum, M. C., 1997. Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philoso¬phy, Vol. 5.1, pp. 1-25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00021
  179. Nussbaum, M. C., 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840715
  180. Nussbaum, M. C., 2008. Toward a Globally Sensitive Patriotism. Daedalus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 78-93. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/daed.2008.137.3.78
  181. Nussbaum, M. C., 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cam¬bridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200
  182. Nussbaum, M. C., 2013. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press. Open Google Scholar
  183. Nussbaum, M. C., 2016. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  184. Obbink, D., 1999. The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City. In: K. Ierodiakonou, ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 178-195. Open Google Scholar
  185. Oestreich, G., 1956. Justus Lipsius als Theoretiker des neuzeitlichen Machtstaates: Zu seinem 350. Todestage (24. März 1606). Historische Zeitschrift, Vol. 181, pp. 31-78. Open Google Scholar
  186. Oestreich, G., 1982. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511562716.006
  187. Oestreich, G., 1989. Antiker Geist und moderner Staat bei Justus Lipsius (1547-1606): Der Neustoizismus als politische Bewegung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar
  188. Oestreich, G., 2008. Justus Lipsius und der politische Neustoizismus in Europa. In: B. Ney¬meyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Lite¬ratur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 1, pp. 575-630. Open Google Scholar
  189. Oliver, G. J., 2007. War, Food, and Politics in Early Hellenistic Athens. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283507.003.0011
  190. Olivieri, M., 2011. Philo’s De Providentia: A Work between Two Traditions. In: P. Pontani & S. Mancini Lombardi, ed. Studies on the Ancient Armenian Version of Philo’s Works. Boston; Leiden: Brill, pp. 87-124. Open Google Scholar
  191. Panksepp, J. & Biven, L., 2012. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. New York; London: Norton. Open Google Scholar
  192. Papy, J. 2011. Fate and Rule, Destiny and Dynasty: Lipsius’s Final Views on Superstition, Fate and Divination in the ‘Monita et Exempla Politica’ (1605). In: E. de Bom, M. Janssens, T van Houdt, & J. Papy, ed. (Un)masking the Realities of Power: Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 195-205. Open Google Scholar
  193. Pernot, L., 1994. Aristide (P. Aelius). In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 358-366. Open Google Scholar
  194. Philo, 1973. Les Oeuvres de Philon d’Alexandrie 35: De providentia I et II: Introduction, traduction et notes, ed. and transl. M. Hadas-Lebel. Paris: Éditions du Cerf. Open Google Scholar
  195. Pierik, R. & Wouter, W., 2010. Cosmopolitanism in Context: An Introduction. In: R. Pierik & W. Wouter, ed. Cosmopolitanism in Context: Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761263.001
  196. Pogge, T. W., 1992. Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty. Ethics, Vol. 103.1, pp. 48-75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/293470
  197. Powell, J. G. F., 2013. The Embassy of the Three Philosophers to Rome in 155 BC. In: C. Kremmydas & K. Tempest, ed. Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change. Oxford: Ox¬ford University Press, pp. 219-248. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654314.003.0011
  198. Pradeau, J.-F., 2015. Gouverner avec le monde: Réflexions antiques sur la mondialisation: Entreprises et société. Paris: Manitoba; Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar
  199. Ramelli, I., 2006. Il “basileus” come ‘nomos empsychos’ tra diritto naturale e diritto divino: Spunti platonici del concetto e sviluppi di età imperiale e tardo-antica. Napoli: Bibliopo¬lis. Open Google Scholar
  200. Ramelli, I., 2008. Stoici Romani minori: Saggi introduttivi, traduzione, note e apparati. Milano: Bompiani. Open Google Scholar
  201. Ramelli, I., 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Transl. D. Konstan. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Open Google Scholar
  202. Ramelli, I., 2016. Social Justice and the Legitimacy of Slavery: The Role of Philosophical Asceticism from Ancient Judaism to Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777274.003.0004
  203. Reesor, M. E., 1951. The Political Theory of the Old and Middle Stoa. New York: J. J. Augustin Publisher. Open Google Scholar
  204. Reydams-Schils, G., 2005a. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar
  205. Reydams-Schils, G., 2005b. Le sage face à Zeus: Logique, éthique et physique dans le stoïcisme impérial. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. Vol. 4 (Les stoïciens et le monde), pp. 579-596. Open Google Scholar
  206. Reydams-Schils, G., 2012. Social Ethics and Politics. In: M. van Ackeren, ed. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 437-452. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1002/9781118219836.ch28
  207. Reydams-Schils, G., 2016. Dio of Prusa and the Roman Stoics on How to Speak the Truth to Oneself and Power. In: C. Arruzza & D. Nikulin, ed. Philosophy and Political Power in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 134-147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004324626_008
  208. Richter, D. S., 2011. Cosmopolis: Imagining Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  209. Roller, M., 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  210. Rollinger, C., 2014. Amicitia sanctissime colenda: Freundschaft und soziale Netzwerke in der späten Republik. Heidelberg: Verlag Antike. Open Google Scholar
  211. Roskam, G., 2005. On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Re¬ception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Open Google Scholar
  212. Rutherford, R. B., 1989. The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  213. Santozki, U., 2006. Die Bedeutung antiker Theorien für die Genese und Systematik von Kants Philosophie: Eine Analyse der drei Kritiken. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110882216
  214. Schafer, J., 2009. Ars Didactica: Seneca’s 94th and 95th Letters. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.13109/9783666252914
  215. Schafer, J., 2011. Seneca’s Epistulae Morales as Dramatized Education. Classical Philology, Vol. 106, pp. 32-52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/659109
  216. Scheffler, S., 2008. Cosmopolitanism, Justice & Institutions. Daedalus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 68-77. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1162/daed.2008.137.3.68
  217. Schiesaro, A., 2015. Seneca and Epicurus: The Allure of the Other. In: S. Bartsch & A. Schiesaro, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Seneca. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239-251. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139542746.022
  218. Schmitz, P., 2014. ‘Cato Peripateticus’ – Stoische und Peripatetische Ethik im Dialog: Cic. ‘Fin.’ 3 und der Aristotelismus des Ersten Jh. v. Chr. (Xenarchos, Boethos und ‘Areios Didymos’). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110337655
  219. Schofield, M., 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  220. Schofield, M., 1999a. Epilogue: ‘Impossible Hypotheses’. In: The Stoic Idea of the City. Rpt. of 1st ed. 1991. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 147-157. Open Google Scholar
  221. Schofield, M., 1999b. Saving the City: Philosopher Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London; New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  222. Scholz, P., 1998. Der Philosoph und die Politik: Die Ausbildung der philosophischen Lebens¬form und die Entwicklung des Verhältnisses von Philosophie und Politik im 4. und 3. Jh. v. Chr. Stuttgart: Steiner. Open Google Scholar
  223. Scholz, P., 2004. Peripatetic Philosophers as Wandering Scholars: Some Remarks on the Socio-Political Conditions of Philosophizing in the Third Century BCE. In: W. W. Forten¬baugh & S. A. White, ed. Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick; London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 315-353, 476-480. Open Google Scholar
  224. Scott, D., 1995. Recollection and Experience: Plato’s Theory of Learning and Its Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  225. Sellars, J., 2016. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. London; New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  226. Seneca, 1965. L. Annaei Senecae ad Lucilium epistulae morales, ed. L. D. Reynolds. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198146490.book.1
  227. Seneca, 1977. Dialogorum libri duodecim, ed. L. D. Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198146599.book.1
  228. Seneca, 2007. De ira: Über die Wut: Lateinisch/Deutsch, ed. and transl. J. Wildberger. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar
  229. Seneca, 2010a. Anger, Mercy, Revenge, transl. R. A. Kaster and M. C. Nussbaum. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  230. Seneca, 2010b. Natural Questions, transl. H. M. Hine. Chicago; London: University of Chi¬cago Press. Open Google Scholar
  231. Seneca, 2011. On Benefits, transl. M. T. Griffin. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226748290.001.0001
  232. Seneca, 2014. Hardship & Happiness, transl. E. Fantham, H. M. Hine, J. Ker, and G. D. Williams. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226108353.001.0001
  233. Seneca, 2015. Letters on Ethics, transl. A. A. Long and M. R. Graver. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226265209.001.0001
  234. Sommer, A. U., 2008. Das Leben als Krieg: Eine Leitmetapher bei Seneca und Lipsius. In: B. Neymeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philoso¬phie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 1, pp. 631-654. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110211559.1.3.631
  235. Sonnabend, H., 1996. Die Freundschaften der Gelehrten und die zwischenstaatliche Politik im klassischen und hellenistischen Griechenland. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Olms. Open Google Scholar
  236. Sorabji, R., 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar
  237. Sorabji, R., 2012. Ghandi and the Stoics: Modern Experiments on Ancient Values. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  238. Spinelli, E., 2016. Stoic Utopia Reconsidered: Pyrrhonism, Ethics, and Politics. In: C. Arruzza & D. Nikulin, ed. Philosophy and Politica Power in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 148-163. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/9789004324626_009
  239. Stanciu, D., 2011. Prudence in Lipsius’s Monita et exempla politica: Stoic Virtue, Aristotelian Virtue or not a Virtue at All? In: E. De Bom, M. Janssens, T. Van Houdt & J. Papy, ed. (Un)masking the Realities of Power: Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 233-262. Open Google Scholar
  240. Straumann, B., 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199950928.003.0009
  241. Striker, G., 1986. Origins of the Concept of Natural Law. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 79-94 (rpt. in G. Striker. Essays on Hellen¬istic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 209-220). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/2213441786X00084
  242. Stroux, J., 1933. Die stoische Beurteilung Alexanders des Großen. Philologus, Vol. 88, pp. 222-240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/phil.1933.88.14.222
  243. Summers, W. C., 1910. Select Letters of Seneca: Edited with Introduction and Explanatory Notes. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar
  244. Tarn, W. W., 1933. Alexander the Great and the Unity of Mankind. Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 19, pp. 123-166. Open Google Scholar
  245. Theiler, W., 1982. Poseidonios: Die Fragmente. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783111610160
  246. Thom, J. C., 2005. Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Tübingen: Mohr Siebek. Open Google Scholar
  247. Thraede, K., 1980. Zwischen Gebrauchstext und Poesie: Zur Spannweite der antiken Gattung ‘Brief’. In: J. Veremans & F. Decreus, ed. Acta Colloquii didactici classici octavi: Amstelodami, DD. 8-11 m. apr. A.D. 1980. Gent: Decreus & Veremans (Didactica classica Gandensia), pp. 179-215. Open Google Scholar
  248. Tieleman, T., 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar
  249. Van Ackeren, M., 2011. Die Philosophie Marc Aurels. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar
  250. Van Ackeren, M., ed., 2012. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  251. Van Hooft, S., 2009. Cosmopolitanism: A Philosophy for Global Ethics. Stocksfield: Acu¬men. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844654444.001
  252. Vander Waerdt, P. A., 1994. Zeno’s Republic and the Origins of Natural Law. In: P. A. Vander Waerdt, ed. The Socratic Movement. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, pp. 272-308. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110883732-010
  253. Veillard, C., 2015. Les stoïciens II: Le stoïcisme intermédiaire (Diogène de Babylonie, Panétius de Rhodes, Posidonius d’Apamée). Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782251760803
  254. Velayos Castelo, C., 1996. Reflections on Stoic Logocentrism. Environmental Ethics, Vol. 18, pp. 291-296. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199618319
  255. Vogt, K. M., 2006. Plutarch über Zenons Traum. In: M. v. Ackeren & J. Müller, ed. Antike Philosophie Verstehen: Understanding Ancient Philosophy. Darmstadt: Wissenschaft¬liche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 196-217. Open Google Scholar
  256. Vogt, K. M., 2008. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  257. Voigt, R., 2014. Den Staat denken: Der Leviathan im Zeichen der Krise. 3rd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  258. Voigt, R., 2015. Der moderne Staat. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10028-5_1
  259. Voigt, R., ed., 2016. Staatsdenken: Zum Stand der Staatstheorie heute. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar
  260. Volkmann, H., 1967. Die Basileia als ἐνδοξος δουλεία: Ein Beitrag zur Wortgeschichte der Duleia. Historia, Vol. 16, pp. 155-161. Open Google Scholar
  261. Vottero, D., 1998. Lucio Annaeo Seneca: I frammenti. Bologna: Pàtron. Open Google Scholar
  262. Wallace-Hadrill, A., ed., 1989. Patronage in Ancient Society. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  263. Wallace-Hadrill, A., 1994. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  264. Waszink, J. H., 1999. Virtuous Deception: The Politica and the Wars in the Low Countries and France, 1559-1589. In: G. Tournoy, J. De Landtsheer & J. Papy, ed. Iustus Lipsius Europae Lumen et Columen: Proceedings of the International Colloquium Leuven 17-19 September 1997. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 248-267. Open Google Scholar
  265. Waszink, J. H., 2004. Introduction. In: Politica: Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction: Edited with Translation and Introduction. Assen: Royal Van Corcum, pp. 3-215. Open Google Scholar
  266. Wildberger, J., 2006. Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110915631
  267. Wildberger, J., 2008. Beast or God? – The Intermediate Status of Humans and the Physical Basis of the Stoic Scala Naturae. In: A. Alexandridis, M. Wild & L. Winkler-Horaček, ed. Mensch und Tier in der Antike: Grenzziehung und Grenzüberschreitung. Wiesbaden: R⁠e⁠i¬chert, pp. 47-70. Open Google Scholar
  268. Wildberger, J., 2013a. Delimiting a Self by God in Epictetus. In: J. Rüpke & G. Woolf, ed. Religious Dimensions of the Self in the Second Century CE. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 23-45. Open Google Scholar
  269. Wildberger, J., 2013b. Bodies, Predicates, and Fated Truths: Ontological Distinctions and the Terminology of Causation in Defenses of Stoic Determinism by Chrysippus and Seneca. In: F. G. Masi & S. Maso, ed. Fate, Change, and Fortune in Ancient Thought. Amsterdam: Hakkert, pp. 103-123. Open Google Scholar
  270. Wildberger, J., 2014a. The Epicurus Trope and the Construction of a Letter Writer in Seneca’s Epistulae Morales. In: J. Wildberger & M. L. Colish, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 431-465. Open Google Scholar
  271. Wildberger, J., 2014b. Review of Giovanni Zago. Sapienza filosofica e cultura materiale: Posidonio e le altre fonti dell’Epistola 90 di Seneca. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino, 2012. Gnomon, Vol. 86, pp. 119-123. Open Google Scholar
  272. Wildberger, J., 2014c. Simus inter exempla! Formen und Funktionen beispielhafter Welt¬flucht in der frühen Kaiserzeit. In: H. Nesselrath & M. Rühl, ed. Der Mensch zwischen Weltflucht und Weltverantwortung: Lebensmodelle der paganen und der jüdisch-christ¬lichen Antike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 85-109. Open Google Scholar
  273. Wildberger, J., 2015. Senecan Progressor Friendship and the Characterization of Nero in Ta¬c⁠i¬tus’ Annals. In: C. Kugelmeier, ed. Translatio humanitatis: Festschrift zum 60. Ge¬b⁠u⁠r⁠t⁠s¬t⁠a⁠g von Peter Riemer. St. Ingbert: Röhrig Universitätsverlag, pp. 471-492. Open Google Scholar
  274. Wildberger, J., 2017a. Amicitia and Eros: Seneca’s Adaptation of a Stoic Concept of Friend¬ship for Roman Men in Progress. In: G. M. Müller & F. M. Zini, ed. Philosophie in Rom – Römische Philosophie?: Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 387-425. Open Google Scholar
  275. Wildberger, J., 2017b. Antionomien des alternden Selbst im Stoizismus. In: A. C. Messner, A. Bihrer & H. Zimmermann, ed. Alter und Selbstbeschränkung: Beiträge aus der Histo¬ri¬schen Anthropologie. Wien; Köln; Weimar: Böhlau, pp. 187-200. Open Google Scholar
  276. Wildberger, J., Forthcoming. Cosmic Beauty in Stoicism: A Foundation for an Environmental Ethic as Love of the Other? In: A. Hunt & H. Marlow, ed. Greening the Gods: Ecology and Theology in the Ancient World. London et al.: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  277. Williams, C. A., 2012. Reading Roman Friendship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  278. Williams, G. D., 2003. Seneca, De Otio; De Brevitate Vitae. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press. Open Google Scholar
  279. Williams, G. D., 2012. The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  280. Williams, G. D., 2014. Double Vision and Cross-Reading in Seneca’s Epistulae Morales and Naturales Quaestiones. In: J. Wildberger & M. L. Colish, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 135-166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/9783110349863.135
  281. Williams, G. D., 2016. Minding the Gap: Seneca, the Self, and the Sublime. In: G. D. Williams & K. Volk, ed. Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 172-191. Open Google Scholar
  282. Willms, L., 2011. Epiktets Diatribe Über die Freiheit (4.1): Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kom¬mentar. Heidelberg: Winter. Open Google Scholar
  283. Winkel, L., 2000. Les origines antiques de l’appetitus societatis de Grotius. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, Vol. 68, pp. 393-403. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/15718190019684370
  284. Zago, G., 2012. Sapienza filosofica e cultura materiale: Posidonio e le altre fonti dell’Epis¬tola 90 di Seneca. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino. Open Google Scholar
  285. Zamfir, K., 2013. Men and Women in the Household of God: A Contextual Approach to Roles and Ministries in the Pastoral Epistles. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.13109/9783666593604
  286. Zanker, P., 1996. The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Oxford: University of California, UC Press E-Books Collections, 1982-2004. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Political Philosophy", "Political Theory", "Philosophy of History"
Cover of book: Helmut Schmidt und Karl Popper
Book Titles No access
Gespräche ohne Zigaretten
Helmut Schmidt und Karl Popper
Cover of book: Hirntod und Organtransplantation
Edited Book No access
Medizinische, ethische und rechtliche Betrachtungen
Hirntod und Organtransplantation
Cover of book: Abendländische Untergänge: Modernekritische Verfallsnarrative im Langen 20. Jahrhundert
Book Titles No access
Abendländische Untergänge: Modernekritische Verfallsnarrative im Langen 20. Jahrhundert
Cover of book: Henry Kissinger
Edited Book No access
Ordnungsmacht und Deutungshoheit
Henry Kissinger
Cover of book: Staatsrecht und Politik bei Christian Thomasius
Edited Book Partial access
Staatsrecht und Politik bei Christian Thomasius

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex