The Stoics and the State: Theory - Practice - Context

Prof. Dr. Jula Wildberger

doi:10.5771/9783845274485

Summary

Was verstanden Stoiker unter einer polis und Staatlichkeit? Was passiert, wenn ihre Ideen unter wechselnden historischen Bedingungen gelebt und neu gedacht werden? The Stoics and the State verfolgt diese Fragen mit detaillierter, philologischer Quellenkritik, präziser Konzeptanalyse sowie weit ausholender thematischer und diachronischer Kontextualisierung. Der systematische Teil behandelt Definitionen, Aspekte der Staatlichkeit (Staatsgebiet, Institutionen, Volk und Staatsidee) und das für den stoischen Staat konstitutive Gemeinsame Gesetz. Die diachronische Darstellung von Zeno bis Marcus Aurelius zeigt die Anwendung der Theorie auf real existierende Gemeinwesen: ihre Bewertung, ihre Entstehung und die politische Praxis. Beispiele moderner Rezeption von Justus Lipsius bis Martha C. Nussbaum verdeutlichen die Eigenheiten der stoischen Staatstheorie, nicht zuletzt ihre Grundlegung in einem Menschbild, das unsere Natur nicht nur als politisch sondern als sozial und wohltätig begreift.

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Edition: 1/2018
Copyright Year: 2018
ISBN-Print: 978-3-8487-2843-5
ISBN-Online: 978-3-8452-7448-5
Publisher: Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series: Staatsverständnisse
Volume: 105
Language: English
Pages: 263
Product Type: Monograph

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 1 - 12
1. A State? No access
2. The Analytical Grid No access
1. The State of Our Sources No access
2. Chrysostom: “Human Beings Administrated by Law” No access
3. 1. “Neither Expugnable nor Subjugable” No access
  2. The Wise State vs. the People as an Organized Group No access
4. Cleanthes: A Construction for Refuge and Justice No access
5. Arius Didymus: Dwelling and Organized Group No access
1. 1. Gymnasia No access
  2. Temples No access
  3. Justice and the Urban Center No access
2. 1. 1. Expansional Social Attachment No access
    2. Essential Social Attachment No access
  2. The Cosmos as a Dwelling Made for Gods and Humans No access
1. The Cosmic Home as a World State No access
2. 1. The Citizen of the Cosmos in Therapy and Exhortation No access
  2. A Cosmic Model-State No access
3. 1. Household Terminology in Stoicism No access
  2. Polis or Politeia? No access
  3. The Cosmic Disposition: Fate, Nature, and Providence No access
  4. The Cosmic Constitution and a Rational Animal’s End No access
1. 1. Law as a Prescriptive and Prohibitive Body No access
  2. Fate and Seed-Description (Logos Spermatikos) No access
2. Justice and the Cosmic Disposition No access
3. Are Stoic Laws Rules? No access
4. Experience, Concepts, and Patterns in Nature No access
1. Reason as a Prerequisite for Citizenship No access
2. 1. Hierarchies in the World State No access
  2. Is God a Citizen Too? No access
3. 1. Right Reason No access
  2. Reason Twisted No access
4. 1. Women No access
  2. Slaves No access
  3. Exiles, Rustics, and Feral Persons No access
  4. Children No access
5. 1. The Erotic Efforts of Sages No access
  2. Eros and Concord No access
6. Becoming a Citizen: A Rational Animal’s End and the State Objective No access
1. 1. The Reality of the Common Law No access
  2. Individual Polities and the Primacy of the Law No access
2. Objectives of Particular States and Best Constitutions No access
3. 1. The Earliest Humans: “Fresh from the Gods” No access
  2. Technology No access
  3. A Golden Age or a Lucky Age? No access
  4. Early Political Philosophy No access
  5. Tyrants and Legislation No access
1. Is Zeno’s Society of Equals a Democracy? No access
2. 1. Historical Context and Theory No access
  2. Early Stoics in Politics No access
3. 1. Engagement with Monarchy and Monarchs No access
  2. Distance and Mediation No access
4. 1. Adaptive Agency No access
  2. In Defense of a Contemplative Life: The Evidence in Seneca No access
  3. Incurable Polities and Progressor Polities No access
  4. Just by Nature No access
  5. Philosophy as Legislation No access
1. The Middle Stoics No access
2. 1. The Body Politic in Seneca’s De Clementia No access
  2. Epictetus on the Emperor as a Source of Enslaving Desires No access
  3. 1. Marcus Conceptualizes His Status as Emperor No access
    2. A Sociable and Political Animal in the World State No access
    3. Ruling in Rome No access
3. 1. The Stoic Opposition and Marcus’ Political Dream No access
  2. 1. A Change of Mind No access
    2. A New Start No access
    3. A New Elite of Equals: The Network of Progressor Friends No access
1. 1. Public Evils and Contingent Laws in De Constantia No access
  2. Human Selfishness and Protective State Power in the Politica No access
2. 1. Anthropology No access
  2. State, Law, and Institutions No access
3. 1. Human Dignity and Human Rights No access
  2. Capabilities vs. Functions: Chrysippus’ Modal Logic No access
  3. Quietistic Disregard for Human Vulnerability? No access
  4. The Common Law, Cultural Diversity, and Minimal Consensus No access
  5. In Conclusion: Radical Evil or Innate Love of Others? No access
Literature No access Pages 231 - 246
Index of Primary Sources Cited No access Pages 247 - 260
Index of Selected Greek and Latin Terms No access Pages 261 - 263

Bibliography (286 entries)

Abel, K., 1964. Poseidonios und Senecas Trostschrift an Marcia (dial. 6,24,5 ff.). Rheinisches Museum, Vol. 107, pp. 221-260. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Alessandrelli, M. & Ranocchia, G., 2017. Scrittore stoico anonimo, Opera incerta: PHerc. 1020, coll. 104-112: Edizione, introduzione e commento. ILIESI-CNR: http://www.iliesi.cnr.it/pubblicazioni/Testi-01-Alessandrelli_Ranocchia.pdf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Alesse, F., 1997. Panezio di Rodi: Testimonianze: Edizione, traduzione e commento. Napoli: Bibliopolis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Algra, K., 2009. Stoic Philosophical Theology and Graeco-Roman Religion. In: R. Salles, ed. God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 224-251. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Annas, J., 1989. Cicero on Stoic Moral Philosophy and Private Property. In: M. T. Griffin & J. Barnes, ed. Philosophia Togata. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 151-173. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Armisen-Marchetti, M., 1989. Sapientiae facies: Étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Asmis, E., 2008. Cicero on Natural Law and the Laws of the State. Classical Antiquity, Vol. 27, pp. 1-33. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Auberger, J., 2016. Strabon d’Amasée. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques: VI: De Sabinillus à Tyrsénos. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 602-612. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Badian, E., 1958. Alexander the Great and the Unity of Mankind. Historia, Vol. 7, pp. 125-144. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Baldry, H. C., 1959. Zeno’s Ideal State. Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 79, pp. 3-15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Baldry, H. C., 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Banateanu, A., 2001. La théorie stoïcienne de l’amitié: Essai de reconstruction. Fribourg: Éditions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bees, R., 2004. Die Oikeiosislehre der Stoa: I. Rekonstruktion ihres Inhalts. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bees, R., 2005. Die Kulturentstehungslehre des Poseidonios: Wege zu ihrer Rekonstruktion. Antike & Abendland, Vol. 51, pp. 13-29. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bees, R., 2011. Zenons Politeia. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bénatouïl, T., 2009. Les stoïciens III: Musonius - Epictète - Marc Aurèle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bénatouïl, T., 2016. Stoicism and Twentieth-Century French Philosophy. In: J. Sellars, ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 360-373. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Benhabib, S., 2008. The Legitimacy of Human Rights. Daedalus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 94-104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bickel, E., 1959. Kant und Seneca: Der bestirnte Himmel über mir und das moralische Gesetz in mir. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Vol. 102, pp. 289-292. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Birley, A. R., 2000. Marcus Aurelius: A Biography. Rpt. of 2nd ed. 1987. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Blom, H. & Winkel, L., 2001/2002. Grotius and the Stoa: Introduction. Grotiana, Vol. 22-23, pp. 3-20. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bobzien, S., 1998. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bobzien, S., 1999. Logic: II The ‘Megarics’; III The Stoics (sections 1-7). In: K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld & M. Schofield, ed. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philoso¬phy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83-157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Boegehold, A. L. et al., 1995. The Athenian Agora, Vol. 28: The Lawcourts at Athens: Sites, Buildings, Equipment, Procedure, and Testimonia. Athens: The American School of Clas¬sical Studies at Athens. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Boeri, M. D. & Salles, R., 2014. Los Filósofos Estoicos: Ontología, Lógica, Física y Ética: Traducción, comentaria filosófico y edición anotada de los principales textos griegos y latinos. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bonazzi, M. & Helmig, C. ed., 2007. Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Bonazzi, M. & Opsomer, J. ed., 2009. The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts. Paris; Louvain: Namur; Walpole: Éditions Peeters; Société des Études Classiques. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Borkenau, F., 1934. Der Übergang vom feudalen zum bürgerlichen Weltbild: Studien zur Geschichte der Philosophie der Manufakturperiode. Paris: Alcan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Boys-Stones, G., 1998. Eros in Government: Zeno and the Virtuous City. Classical Quar¬terly, Vol. 48, pp. 168-174. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Boys-Stones, G., 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brandt, R., 2007. Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Hamburg: Meiner. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Braund, S. M., 2009. Seneca, De clementia. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brennan, T., 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brittain, C., 2005. Common Sense: Concepts, Definition and Meaning in and out of the Stoa. In: D. Frede & B. Inwood, ed. Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164-209. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brooke, C., 2012. Philosophic Pride: Stoicism and Political Thought from Lipsius to Rous¬seau. Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brouwer, R., 2011. On Law and Equity: The Stoic View. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Vol. 128, pp. 17-38. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brouwer, R., 2014. The Stoic Sage: The Early Stoics on Wisdom, Sagehood and Socrates. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brown, E., 2006. Hellenistic Cosmpolitanism. In: M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin, ed. A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Malden; Oxford; Carlton: Blackwell, pp. 549-558. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brown, E., 2009. The Emergence of Natural Law and the Cosmopolis. In: S. Salkever, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 331-364. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brown, G. W. & Held, D., 2010. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge; Malden: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brunschwig, J., 2005. Sur deux notions de l’éthique stoïcienne: De la ‘reserve’ au ‘renverse¬ment’. In: J. Gourinat & G. Romeyer-Dherbey, ed. Les stoïciens. Paris: Vrin, pp. 335-356. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Brunt, P. A., 2013. Studies in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Cartledge, P. & Edge, M., 2009. ‘Rights,’ Individuals, and Communities in Ancient Greece. In: R. K. Balot, ed. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 149-163. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Caspar, T. W., 2011. Recovering the Ancient View of Founding: A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Lanham: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Christes, J., 2007. Populus und res publica in Ciceros Schrift ‘De re publica.’ In: E. Richter, R. Voigt & H. König, ed. Res Publica und Demokratie: Die Bedeutung von Cicero für das heutige Staatsverständnis. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 85-104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Cicero, 2001. On Moral Ends, ed. J. Annas; transl. R. Woolf. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Colish, M. L., 2014. Seneca on Acting against Conscience. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 95-110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Costa, S., 2013. “Quod olim fuerat” – La rappresentazione del passato in Seneca prosatore. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Olms. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Daniélou, J., 2014. Philo of Alexandria. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co. (= Philon d’Alex¬andrie. Paris: Fayard, 1958). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dawson, D., 1992. Cities of the Gods: Communist Utopias in Greek Thought. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
De Pietro, M., 2014. Having the Right to Philosophize: A New Reading of Seneca, De Vita Beata 1.1.-6.2. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 343-367. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R., 2004. Il cielo e il soffitto: Speculazione filosofica e realtà romana nell’epistola 90 di Seneca. In: L. de Finis, ed. Colloquio su Seneca. Trento: Trento Asso¬ciazione italiana di cultura classica, pp. 65-88. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Degl’Innocenti Pierini, R., 2014. Freedom in Seneca: Some Reflections on the Relationship between Philosophy and Politics, Public and Private Life. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wild¬berger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 167-187. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Devine, F. E., 1970. Stoicism on the Best Regime. Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 31, pp. 323-336. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dionigi, I., 1983. Lucio Anneo Seneca, De otio (Dial. VIII): Testo e apparato critico, con introduzione, versione e commento. Bescia: Paideia. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dorandi, T., 1982. Filodemo. Gli Stoici (PHerc. 155 e 339). Cronache Ercolanesi, Vol. 12, pp. 91-133. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dorandi, T., 1994. Storia dei filosofi: La Stoa da Zenone a Panezio (PHerc. 1018): Edizione, traduzione e commento. Leiden; New York; Köln: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dorandi, T., 1999. Antigone de Caryste, Fragments: Texte établi et traduit. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Doyle, D. & Torralba, J. M., 2016. Kant and Stoic Ethics. In: J. Sellars, ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 270-284. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dyck, A. R., 1996. A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Dyck, A. R., 2004. A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus. Ann Arbor: University of Michi¬gan Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Edelstein, L. & Kidd, I. G., 1989. Posidonius. I: The Fragments. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cam¬bridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Epictetus, 1995. The Discourses. The Handbook. Fragments, transl. E. Carter, revised by R. Hard. London; Vermont: Dent; Tuttle (Everyman). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Erler, M., 2007. Platon. Ueberweg Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie: Antike 2/2. Basel: Schwabe. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Erskine, A., 1990. The Hellenistic Stoa: Political Thought and Action. Ithaca: Cornell Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Eusebius, 1987. Eusèbe de Césarée. La préparation évangelique, Livres XIV-XV: Introduc¬tion, texte grec, traduction et annotation, ed. and transl. E. des Places. Paris: Les éditions du CERF (Sources Chrétiennes 338). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Farquharson, A. S. L., 1944. The Meditations of the Emperor Marcus Antoninus: Edited with Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Feldman, N., 2007. Cosmpolitan Law? The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 116, pp. 1022-1070. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Follet, S., 1994. Aristocréon. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques I: Abam(m)on à Axiothéa. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 386-389. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Fontanella, F., 2012. Politica e diritto naturale nel De legibus di Cicerone. Roma: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Ford, C. A., 1996. Preaching Propriety to Princes: Grotius, Lipsius, and Neo-Stoic Interna¬tional Law. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 28, pp. 313-366. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Forschner, M., 2003. Philosophie und Politik: Dions philosophische Botschaft. In: H.-G. Nesselrath et al. Dion von Prusa, Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ordnung: Die Borysthenes-Rede: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 128-156. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Frede, M., 1999. Stoic Epistemology. In: K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld & M. Schofield, ed. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295-322. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gaca, K. L., 2000. Early Stoic Eros: The Sexual Ethics of Zeno and Chrysippus and Their Evaluation of the Greek Erotic Tradition. Apeiron, Vol. 33, pp. 207-23. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gaca, K. L., 2003. Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics, and Political Reform in Greek Phi¬losophy and Early Christianity. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gauly, B. M., 2004. Senecas Naturales quaestiones: Naturphilosophie für die römische Kai¬serzeit. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gerson, L. P. & Inwood, B., 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. 2nd ed. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Giannantoni, G., 1988. Cinici e stoici su Alessandro Magno. In: G. Casertano, ed. I filosofi e il potere nella società e nella cultura antiche. Napoli: Guida, pp. 75-87. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gill, C., 2000. Stoic Writers of the Imperial Era. In: C. Rowe & M. Schofield, ed. The Cam¬bridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 597-615. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gill, C., 2005. Competing Readings of Stoic Emotions. In: R. Salles, ed. Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Clar¬endon Press, pp. 445-470. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gill, C., 2006. The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gloyn, E., 2016. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Goeken, J., 2012. Aelius Aristide et la rhétorique de l’hymne en prose. Turnhout: Brepols. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Goulet-Gazé, M.-O., ed., 2011. Études sur la théorie stoïcienne de l’action. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gourinat, J.-B., 2011. Aëtius et Arius Didyme sources de Stobée. In: G. Reydams-Schils, ed. Thinking Through Excerpts: Studies on Stobaeus. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 143-200. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gourinat, J.-B., 2012. Persaïos de Kition. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques: Va: De Paccius à Plotin. Paris: CRNS Éditions, pp. 234-243. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gourinat, J.-B., ed., 2016. L’éthique du stoïcien Hiéroclès. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Uni¬versitaires du Septentrion. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Graver, M. R., 2002. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4: Translated and with Commentary. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Graver, M. R., 2007. Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Graver, M. R., 2014. Honeybee Reading and Self-Scripting: Seneca’s 84th Epistle. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 269-293. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Graver, M. R., 2016a. Honor and the Honorable: Cato’s Discourse in De Finibus 3. In: J. Annas & G. Betegh, ed. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cam¬bridge University Press, pp. 118-146. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Graver, M. R., 2016b. The Emotional Intelligence of Epicureans: Doctrinalism and Adaptation in Seneca’s Epistles. In: G. D. Williams & K. Volk, ed. Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 192-210. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Griffin, M. T., 1992. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Griffin, M. T., 2013. Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Guérard, C. & Goulet, R., 2016. Sphaïros le Borysthénite RE3. In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques VI: De Sabinillus à Tyrsénos. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 540-545. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Gueye, C. M., 2006. Late Stoic Cosmopolitanism: Foundations and Relevance. Heidelberg: Winter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Güremen, R., Hammerstaedt, J. & Morel, P.-M. ed., 2017. Diogenes of Oinoanda: Epicure¬anism and Philosophical Debate. Diogène d'Œnoanda: Épicurisme et controverses. Leu¬ven: Leuven University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Haake, M., 2004. Documentary Evidence, Literary Forgery, or Manipulation of Historical Documents? Diogenes Laertius and an Athenian Honorary Decree for Zeno of Citium. Classical Quarterly, Vol. 54, pp. 470-483. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Haake, M., 2007. Der Philosoph in der Stadt: Untersuchungen zur öffentlichen Rede über Philosophen und Philosophie in den hellenistischen Poleis. München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Haake, M., 2013. Illustrating, Documenting, Making-Believe: The Use of Psephismata in Hellenistic Biographers of Philosophers. In: P. Liddel & P. Low, ed. Inscriptions and Their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79-124. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Habicht, C., 1994. Athen in hellenistischer Zeit. München: C. H. Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Habicht, C., 1997. Athens from Alexander to Antony. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Habinek, T., 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Habinek, T., 2000. Seneca’s Renown: Gloria, Claritudo, and the Replication of the Roman Elite. Classical Antiquity, Vol. 19, pp. 264-303. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hadas-Lebel, M., 2012. Philo of Alexandria: A Thinker in the Jewish Diaspora. Leiden; Bos¬ton: Brill (= Philon d’Alexandrie: un penseur en diaspora. Paris: Fayard, 2003). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hadot, I., 2014. Getting to Goodness: Reflections on Chapter 10 of Brad Inwood, Reading Seneca. In: J. Wildberger & M. L. Colish, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 9-41. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hadot, P., 1992. Introduction aux ‘Pensées’ de Marc Aurèle: La citatelle intérieure. Paris: Fayard. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hahm, D. E., 1990. The Ethical Doxography of Arius Didymus. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Vol. II, 36.4, pp. 2935-3052. 3234-43. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hahm, D. E., 1992a. Diogenes Laertius VII: On the Stoics. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Vol. II, 36.6, pp. 4076-182. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hahm, D. E., 1992b. A Neglected Stoic Argument for Human Responsibility. Illinois Classi¬cal Studies, Vol. 17, pp. 23-48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hammerstaedt, J. & Smith, M. F., 2014. The Epicurean Inscription of Diogenes of Oinoanda: Ten Years of New Discoveries and Research. Bonn: Habelt. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Harding, P. E., 2015. Athens Transformed, 404-262 BC: From Popular Sovereignty to the Dominion of the Elite. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, R. W. & Sheppard, A. ed., 2010. Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato. London: Institute of Classical Studies. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hill, L., 2000. The Two Republicae of the Roman Stoics: Can a Cosmpolite Be a Patriot? Citizenship Studies, Vol. 4, pp. 65-79. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hine, H. M., 2006. Rome, the Cosmos, and the Emperor in Seneca’s Natural Questions. Jour¬nal of Roman Studies, Vol. 96, pp. 42-72. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Horn, C., 2008. Kant und die Stoiker. In: B. Neymeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 2, pp. 1081-1104. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Hülser, K., 1987. Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker: Neue Sammlung der Texte mit deutscher Übersetzung und Kommentaren. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-Holzboog. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Inwood, B., 1999. Rule and Reasoing in Stoic Ethics. In: K. Ierodiakonou, ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 95-127. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Inwood, B., 2005. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Inwood, B., 2007. Seneca. Selected Philosophical Letters: Translation with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Inwood, B., 2014. Ethics After Aristotle. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Inwood, B., 2016. The Voice of Nature. In: J. Annas & G. Betegh, ed. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147-166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Jellinek, G., 1900. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Berlin: Häring. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Jessop, B., 2016. The State: Past, Present, Future. Cambridge: Polity. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Jones, M., 2014. Seneca’s Letters to Lucilius: Hypocrisy as a Way of Life. In: M. L. Colish & J. Wildberger, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 393-429. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Jong, A. d., 2003. Dions Magierhymnen: Zoroastrischer Mythos oder griechische Phantasie? In: H.-G. Nesselrath et al. Dion von Prusa, Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ord¬nung: Die Borysthenes-Rede: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 157-178. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Kaufmann, S., 2008. Die stoisch-ciceronische Naturrechtslehre und ihre Rezeption bis Rous¬seau. In: B. Neyrmeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 1, pp. 229-292. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Kidd, I. G., 1988. Posidonius: II. The Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Klessinger, H., 2008. Spinozas Stoizismus. In: B. Neymeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik: Eine Kul¬turgeschichte von der Antike bis zur Moderne. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 2, pp. 997-1016. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Konstan, D., 2009. Cosmopolitan Traditions. In: R. K. Balot, ed. A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 473-484. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Kühn, W., 2011. L’attachement à soi et aux autres. In: M. Goulet-Cazé, ed. Études sur la théorie stoïcienne de l’action. Paris: Vrin, pp. 237-366. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Küppers, J., 1996. ‘Kosmosschau’ und virtus in den Philosophica Senecas. Antike & Abendland, Vol. 42, pp. 57-75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lagrée, J., 2010. Le néostoïcisme. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lana, I., 1996. Pingue otium et arbitrium sui temporis … (Sénèque, epist. LXXIII, 10). In: J. André, ed. Les loisirs et l’héritage de la culture classique (Dijon, 27-31 août 1993). Brux¬elles: Latomus, pp. 425-433. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Laurand, V., 2005. La politique stoïcienne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Laurand, V., 2014. Stoïcisme et lien social: Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus. Paris: Classiques Garnier. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lausberg, M., 1970. Untersuchungen zu Senecas Fragmenten. Berlin: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lee, M. V., 2006. Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lendon, J. E., 1997. Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lindberg, B., 2011. Stoicism in Political Humanism and Natural Law. In: E. De Bom, M. Janssens, T. Van Houdt & J. Papy, ed. (Un)masking the Realities of Power: Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 73-93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lintott, A., 1997. The Theory of the Mixed Constitution at Rome. In: J. Barnes & M. T. Griffin, ed. Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 70-85. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lipsius, J., 2004. Politica: Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction: Edited with Trans¬lation and Introduction, ed. and transl. J. Waszink. Assen: Royal Van Corcum. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lipsius, J., 2011. Concering Constancy, ed. and transl. R. V. Young. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A., ed., 1971. Problems in Stoicism. London: The Athlone Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A., 2002. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A., 2003. Stoicism in the Philosophical Tradition: Spinoza, Lipsius, Butler. In: B. Inwood, ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 365-392. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A., 2008a. Philo on Stoic Physics. In: F. Alesse, ed. Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 121-140. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A., 2008b. The Concept of the Cosmopolitan in Greek & Roman Thought. Daeda¬lus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 50-58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A., 2012. The Self in the Meditations. In: M. v. Ackeren, ed. A Companion to Mar¬cus Aurelius. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 465-480. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D., ed., 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Lorenz, H., 2011. Posidonius on the Nature and Treatment of the Emotions. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 40, pp. 189-211. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Malaspina, E., 2003. La teoria politica de De clementia: un inevitabile fallimento? In: A. De Vivo & E. Lo Cascio, ed. Seneca uomo politico e l’età di Claudio e di Nerone: Atti del Convegno internazionale (Capri 25-27 marzo 1999). Bari: Edipuglia, pp. 139-157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Malaspina, E., 2004. L. Annaei Senecae De clementia libri duo: Prolegomeni, testo critico e commento. 2nd ed. Alessandria: D’Orso. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Malaspina, E., 2009. La Clemenza: Introduzione. In: L. de Biasi, A. Ferrero, E. Malaspina & D. Vottero, ed. Lucio Anneo Seneca: La Clemenza. Apocolocintosi. Epigrammi. Fram¬menti. Torino: UTET, pp. 9-101. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Malitz, J., 1983. Die Historien des Poseidonios. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Malitz, J., 1985. Helvidius Priscus und Vespasian: Zur Geschichte der ‘stoischen’ Senatsopposition. Hermes, Vol. 113, pp. 231-246. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mann, C. & Scholz, P. ed., 2012. ‘Demokratie’ im Hellenismus: Von der Herrschaft des Volkes zur Herrschaft der Honoratioren? Mainz: Verlag Antike. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mansfeld, J., 1983. Techne: A New Fragment of Chrysippus. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 57-65. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mansfeld, J., 1986. Diogenes Laertius on Stoic Philosophy. Elenchos, Vol. 7, pp. 295-382. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mansfeld, J., 1999. Sources. In: K. Algra, J. Barnes, J. Mansfeld & M. Schofield, ed. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mansfeld, J., 2001. Plato, Pythagoras, Aristotle, the Peripatetics, the Stoics, and Thales and His Followers ‘On Causes’. In: A. Brancacci, ed. La filosofia in età imperiale: Le schuole e le tradizione filosofiche: Atti del colloquio, Roma, 17-19 Giugno 1999. Napoli: Biblio¬polis, pp. 16-68. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Marcus Aurelius, 1987. Ad se ipsum libri XII, ed. J. Dalfen. Leipzig: Teubner. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Marcus Aurelius, 2006. Meditations, transl. M. Hammond. Introduction and Comments by D. Clay. London: Penguin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Marcus Aurelius, 2011. Meditations with Selected Correspondence, transl. R. Hard. Introduc¬tion and Notes by C. Gill. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
McConnell, S., 2014. Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mikeš, V., 2016. Le paradoxe stoïcien: Liberté de l’action déterminée. Paris: Vrin. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Miller, J., 2003. Stoics, Grotius, and Spinoza on Moral Deliberation. In: J. Miller & B. Inwood, ed. Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 116-140. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Miller, J., 2016. Spinoza and the Stoics. In: J. Sellars, ed. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. Abingdon; New York: Routledge, pp. 218-225. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Miller, P. N., 2002. Nazis and Neostoics: Otto Brunner and Gerhard Oestreich before and after the Second World War. Past & Present, Vol. 176, pp. 144-186. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Mitsis, P., 1999. The Stoic Origin of Natural Rights. In: K. Ierodiakonou, ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 153-177. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Moles, J. L., 1996. Cynic Cosmopolitanism. In: R. B. Branham & M. Goulet-Gazé, ed. The Cynics. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, pp. 105-120. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Morford, M., 1991. Stoics and Neostoics: Rubens and the Circle of Lipsius. Princeton: Prince¬ton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Morford, M., 1993. Tacitean Prudentia and the Doctrines of Justus Lipsius. In: T. J. Luce & A. J. Woodman, ed. Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 129-151. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nesselrath, H.-G., 2003. Einführung in die Schrift; Text und Übersetzung. In: H.-G. Nesselrath et al. Dion von Prusa, Menschliche Gemeinschaft und göttliche Ordnung: Die Borysthenes-Rede: Eingeleitet, übersetzt und mit interpretierenden Essays versehen. Darm¬stadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 11-92. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Newmyer, S. T., 2017. The Animal and the Human in Ancient and Modern Thought: The ‘Man Alone of Animals’ Concept. New York; London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nicols, J., 2014. Civic Patronage in the Roman Empire. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nikulin, D., 2016. Diogenes the Comic, or How to Tell the Truth in the Face of a Tyrant. In: C. Arruzza & D. Nikulin, ed. Philosophy and Politica Power in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 114-133. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nussbaum, M. C., 1997. Kant and Stoic Cosmopolitanism. The Journal of Political Philoso¬phy, Vol. 5.1, pp. 1-25. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nussbaum, M. C., 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nussbaum, M. C., 2008. Toward a Globally Sensitive Patriotism. Daedalus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 78-93. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nussbaum, M. C., 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cam¬bridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nussbaum, M. C., 2013. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, Mass.; London: Belknap Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Nussbaum, M. C., 2016. Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Obbink, D., 1999. The Stoic Sage in the Cosmic City. In: K. Ierodiakonou, ed. Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 178-195. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Oestreich, G., 1956. Justus Lipsius als Theoretiker des neuzeitlichen Machtstaates: Zu seinem 350. Todestage (24. März 1606). Historische Zeitschrift, Vol. 181, pp. 31-78. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Oestreich, G., 1982. Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni¬versity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Oestreich, G., 1989. Antiker Geist und moderner Staat bei Justus Lipsius (1547-1606): Der Neustoizismus als politische Bewegung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Oestreich, G., 2008. Justus Lipsius und der politische Neustoizismus in Europa. In: B. Ney¬meyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philosophie, Lite¬ratur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 1, pp. 575-630. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Oliver, G. J., 2007. War, Food, and Politics in Early Hellenistic Athens. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Olivieri, M., 2011. Philo’s De Providentia: A Work between Two Traditions. In: P. Pontani & S. Mancini Lombardi, ed. Studies on the Ancient Armenian Version of Philo’s Works. Boston; Leiden: Brill, pp. 87-124. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Panksepp, J. & Biven, L., 2012. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotions. New York; London: Norton. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Papy, J. 2011. Fate and Rule, Destiny and Dynasty: Lipsius’s Final Views on Superstition, Fate and Divination in the ‘Monita et Exempla Politica’ (1605). In: E. de Bom, M. Janssens, T van Houdt, & J. Papy, ed. (Un)masking the Realities of Power: Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 195-205. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Pernot, L., 1994. Aristide (P. Aelius). In: R. Goulet, ed. Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. Paris: CNRS Éditions, pp. 358-366. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Philo, 1973. Les Oeuvres de Philon d’Alexandrie 35: De providentia I et II: Introduction, traduction et notes, ed. and transl. M. Hadas-Lebel. Paris: Éditions du Cerf. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Pierik, R. & Wouter, W., 2010. Cosmopolitanism in Context: An Introduction. In: R. Pierik & W. Wouter, ed. Cosmopolitanism in Context: Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-15. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Pogge, T. W., 1992. Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty. Ethics, Vol. 103.1, pp. 48-75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Powell, J. G. F., 2013. The Embassy of the Three Philosophers to Rome in 155 BC. In: C. Kremmydas & K. Tempest, ed. Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change. Oxford: Ox¬ford University Press, pp. 219-248. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Pradeau, J.-F., 2015. Gouverner avec le monde: Réflexions antiques sur la mondialisation: Entreprises et société. Paris: Manitoba; Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Ramelli, I., 2006. Il “basileus” come ‘nomos empsychos’ tra diritto naturale e diritto divino: Spunti platonici del concetto e sviluppi di età imperiale e tardo-antica. Napoli: Bibliopo¬lis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Ramelli, I., 2008. Stoici Romani minori: Saggi introduttivi, traduzione, note e apparati. Milano: Bompiani. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Ramelli, I., 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Transl. D. Konstan. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Ramelli, I., 2016. Social Justice and the Legitimacy of Slavery: The Role of Philosophical Asceticism from Ancient Judaism to Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Reesor, M. E., 1951. The Political Theory of the Old and Middle Stoa. New York: J. J. Augustin Publisher. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Reydams-Schils, G., 2005a. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Reydams-Schils, G., 2005b. Le sage face à Zeus: Logique, éthique et physique dans le stoïcisme impérial. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale. Vol. 4 (Les stoïciens et le monde), pp. 579-596. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Reydams-Schils, G., 2012. Social Ethics and Politics. In: M. van Ackeren, ed. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 437-452. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Reydams-Schils, G., 2016. Dio of Prusa and the Roman Stoics on How to Speak the Truth to Oneself and Power. In: C. Arruzza & D. Nikulin, ed. Philosophy and Political Power in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 134-147. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Richter, D. S., 2011. Cosmopolis: Imagining Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Roller, M., 2001. Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Rollinger, C., 2014. Amicitia sanctissime colenda: Freundschaft und soziale Netzwerke in der späten Republik. Heidelberg: Verlag Antike. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Roskam, G., 2005. On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Re¬ception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Rutherford, R. B., 1989. The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius: A Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Santozki, U., 2006. Die Bedeutung antiker Theorien für die Genese und Systematik von Kants Philosophie: Eine Analyse der drei Kritiken. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schafer, J., 2009. Ars Didactica: Seneca’s 94th and 95th Letters. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schafer, J., 2011. Seneca’s Epistulae Morales as Dramatized Education. Classical Philology, Vol. 106, pp. 32-52. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Scheffler, S., 2008. Cosmopolitanism, Justice & Institutions. Daedalus, Vol. 137.3, pp. 68-77. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schiesaro, A., 2015. Seneca and Epicurus: The Allure of the Other. In: S. Bartsch & A. Schiesaro, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Seneca. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239-251. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schmitz, P., 2014. ‘Cato Peripateticus’ – Stoische und Peripatetische Ethik im Dialog: Cic. ‘Fin.’ 3 und der Aristotelismus des Ersten Jh. v. Chr. (Xenarchos, Boethos und ‘Areios Didymos’). Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schofield, M., 1991. The Stoic Idea of the City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schofield, M., 1999a. Epilogue: ‘Impossible Hypotheses’. In: The Stoic Idea of the City. Rpt. of 1st ed. 1991. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 147-157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Schofield, M., 1999b. Saving the City: Philosopher Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London; New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Scholz, P., 1998. Der Philosoph und die Politik: Die Ausbildung der philosophischen Lebens¬form und die Entwicklung des Verhältnisses von Philosophie und Politik im 4. und 3. Jh. v. Chr. Stuttgart: Steiner. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Scholz, P., 2004. Peripatetic Philosophers as Wandering Scholars: Some Remarks on the Socio-Political Conditions of Philosophizing in the Third Century BCE. In: W. W. Forten¬baugh & S. A. White, ed. Lyco of Troas and Hieronymus of Rhodes: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick; London: Transaction Publishers, pp. 315-353, 476-480. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Scott, D., 1995. Recollection and Experience: Plato’s Theory of Learning and Its Successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Sellars, J., 2016. The Routledge Handbook of the Stoic Tradition. London; New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 1965. L. Annaei Senecae ad Lucilium epistulae morales, ed. L. D. Reynolds. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 1977. Dialogorum libri duodecim, ed. L. D. Reynolds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 2007. De ira: Über die Wut: Lateinisch/Deutsch, ed. and transl. J. Wildberger. Stuttgart: Reclam. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 2010a. Anger, Mercy, Revenge, transl. R. A. Kaster and M. C. Nussbaum. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 2010b. Natural Questions, transl. H. M. Hine. Chicago; London: University of Chi¬cago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 2011. On Benefits, transl. M. T. Griffin. Chicago; London: Chicago University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 2014. Hardship & Happiness, transl. E. Fantham, H. M. Hine, J. Ker, and G. D. Williams. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Seneca, 2015. Letters on Ethics, transl. A. A. Long and M. R. Graver. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Sommer, A. U., 2008. Das Leben als Krieg: Eine Leitmetapher bei Seneca und Lipsius. In: B. Neymeyr, J. Schmidt & B. Zimmermann, ed. Stoizismus in der europäischen Philoso¬phie, Literatur, Kunst und Politik. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, Vol. 1, pp. 631-654. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Sonnabend, H., 1996. Die Freundschaften der Gelehrten und die zwischenstaatliche Politik im klassischen und hellenistischen Griechenland. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Olms. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Sorabji, R., 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Sorabji, R., 2012. Ghandi and the Stoics: Modern Experiments on Ancient Values. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Spinelli, E., 2016. Stoic Utopia Reconsidered: Pyrrhonism, Ethics, and Politics. In: C. Arruzza & D. Nikulin, ed. Philosophy and Politica Power in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 148-163. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Stanciu, D., 2011. Prudence in Lipsius’s Monita et exempla politica: Stoic Virtue, Aristotelian Virtue or not a Virtue at All? In: E. De Bom, M. Janssens, T. Van Houdt & J. Papy, ed. (Un)masking the Realities of Power: Justus Lipsius and the Dynamics of Political Writing in Early Modern Europe. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 233-262. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Straumann, B., 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Striker, G., 1986. Origins of the Concept of Natural Law. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, Vol. 2, pp. 79-94 (rpt. in G. Striker. Essays on Hellen¬istic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 209-220). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Stroux, J., 1933. Die stoische Beurteilung Alexanders des Großen. Philologus, Vol. 88, pp. 222-240. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Summers, W. C., 1910. Select Letters of Seneca: Edited with Introduction and Explanatory Notes. London: Macmillan. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Tarn, W. W., 1933. Alexander the Great and the Unity of Mankind. Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 19, pp. 123-166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Theiler, W., 1982. Poseidonios: Die Fragmente. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Thom, J. C., 2005. Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Tübingen: Mohr Siebek. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Thraede, K., 1980. Zwischen Gebrauchstext und Poesie: Zur Spannweite der antiken Gattung ‘Brief’. In: J. Veremans & F. Decreus, ed. Acta Colloquii didactici classici octavi: Amstelodami, DD. 8-11 m. apr. A.D. 1980. Gent: Decreus & Veremans (Didactica classica Gandensia), pp. 179-215. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Tieleman, T., 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden; Boston: Brill. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Van Ackeren, M., 2011. Die Philosophie Marc Aurels. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Van Ackeren, M., ed., 2012. A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Malden; Oxford; Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Van Hooft, S., 2009. Cosmopolitanism: A Philosophy for Global Ethics. Stocksfield: Acu¬men. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Vander Waerdt, P. A., 1994. Zeno’s Republic and the Origins of Natural Law. In: P. A. Vander Waerdt, ed. The Socratic Movement. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, pp. 272-308. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Veillard, C., 2015. Les stoïciens II: Le stoïcisme intermédiaire (Diogène de Babylonie, Panétius de Rhodes, Posidonius d’Apamée). Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Velayos Castelo, C., 1996. Reflections on Stoic Logocentrism. Environmental Ethics, Vol. 18, pp. 291-296. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Vogt, K. M., 2006. Plutarch über Zenons Traum. In: M. v. Ackeren & J. Müller, ed. Antike Philosophie Verstehen: Understanding Ancient Philosophy. Darmstadt: Wissenschaft¬liche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 196-217. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Vogt, K. M., 2008. Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Voigt, R., 2014. Den Staat denken: Der Leviathan im Zeichen der Krise. 3rd ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Voigt, R., 2015. Der moderne Staat. Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Voigt, R., ed., 2016. Staatsdenken: Zum Stand der Staatstheorie heute. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Volkmann, H., 1967. Die Basileia als ἐνδοξος δουλεία: Ein Beitrag zur Wortgeschichte der Duleia. Historia, Vol. 16, pp. 155-161. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Vottero, D., 1998. Lucio Annaeo Seneca: I frammenti. Bologna: Pàtron. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wallace-Hadrill, A., ed., 1989. Patronage in Ancient Society. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wallace-Hadrill, A., 1994. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Waszink, J. H., 1999. Virtuous Deception: The Politica and the Wars in the Low Countries and France, 1559-1589. In: G. Tournoy, J. De Landtsheer & J. Papy, ed. Iustus Lipsius Europae Lumen et Columen: Proceedings of the International Colloquium Leuven 17-19 September 1997. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 248-267. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Waszink, J. H., 2004. Introduction. In: Politica: Six Books of Politics or Political Instruction: Edited with Translation and Introduction. Assen: Royal Van Corcum, pp. 3-215. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2006. Seneca und die Stoa: Der Platz des Menschen in der Welt. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2008. Beast or God? – The Intermediate Status of Humans and the Physical Basis of the Stoic Scala Naturae. In: A. Alexandridis, M. Wild & L. Winkler-Horaček, ed. Mensch und Tier in der Antike: Grenzziehung und Grenzüberschreitung. Wiesbaden: R⁠e⁠i¬chert, pp. 47-70. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2013a. Delimiting a Self by God in Epictetus. In: J. Rüpke & G. Woolf, ed. Religious Dimensions of the Self in the Second Century CE. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 23-45. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2013b. Bodies, Predicates, and Fated Truths: Ontological Distinctions and the Terminology of Causation in Defenses of Stoic Determinism by Chrysippus and Seneca. In: F. G. Masi & S. Maso, ed. Fate, Change, and Fortune in Ancient Thought. Amsterdam: Hakkert, pp. 103-123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2014a. The Epicurus Trope and the Construction of a Letter Writer in Seneca’s Epistulae Morales. In: J. Wildberger & M. L. Colish, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 431-465. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2014b. Review of Giovanni Zago. Sapienza filosofica e cultura materiale: Posidonio e le altre fonti dell’Epistola 90 di Seneca. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino, 2012. Gnomon, Vol. 86, pp. 119-123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2014c. Simus inter exempla! Formen und Funktionen beispielhafter Welt¬flucht in der frühen Kaiserzeit. In: H. Nesselrath & M. Rühl, ed. Der Mensch zwischen Weltflucht und Weltverantwortung: Lebensmodelle der paganen und der jüdisch-christ¬lichen Antike. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 85-109. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2015. Senecan Progressor Friendship and the Characterization of Nero in Ta¬c⁠i¬tus’ Annals. In: C. Kugelmeier, ed. Translatio humanitatis: Festschrift zum 60. Ge¬b⁠u⁠r⁠t⁠s¬t⁠a⁠g von Peter Riemer. St. Ingbert: Röhrig Universitätsverlag, pp. 471-492. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2017a. Amicitia and Eros: Seneca’s Adaptation of a Stoic Concept of Friend¬ship for Roman Men in Progress. In: G. M. Müller & F. M. Zini, ed. Philosophie in Rom – Römische Philosophie?: Kultur-, literatur- und philosophiegeschichtliche Perspektiven. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 387-425. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., 2017b. Antionomien des alternden Selbst im Stoizismus. In: A. C. Messner, A. Bihrer & H. Zimmermann, ed. Alter und Selbstbeschränkung: Beiträge aus der Histo¬ri¬schen Anthropologie. Wien; Köln; Weimar: Böhlau, pp. 187-200. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Wildberger, J., Forthcoming. Cosmic Beauty in Stoicism: A Foundation for an Environmental Ethic as Love of the Other? In: A. Hunt & H. Marlow, ed. Greening the Gods: Ecology and Theology in the Ancient World. London et al.: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Williams, C. A., 2012. Reading Roman Friendship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Williams, G. D., 2003. Seneca, De Otio; De Brevitate Vitae. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer¬sity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Williams, G. D., 2012. The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study of Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Williams, G. D., 2014. Double Vision and Cross-Reading in Seneca’s Epistulae Morales and Naturales Quaestiones. In: J. Wildberger & M. L. Colish, ed. Seneca Philosophus. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 135-166. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Williams, G. D., 2016. Minding the Gap: Seneca, the Self, and the Sublime. In: G. D. Williams & K. Volk, ed. Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 172-191. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Willms, L., 2011. Epiktets Diatribe Über die Freiheit (4.1): Einleitung, Übersetzung, Kom¬mentar. Heidelberg: Winter. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Winkel, L., 2000. Les origines antiques de l’appetitus societatis de Grotius. Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, Vol. 68, pp. 393-403. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Zago, G., 2012. Sapienza filosofica e cultura materiale: Posidonio e le altre fonti dell’Epis¬tola 90 di Seneca. Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Zamfir, K., 2013. Men and Women in the Household of God: A Contextual Approach to Roles and Ministries in the Pastoral Epistles. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485
Zanker, P., 1996. The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Berkeley; Los Angeles: Oxford: University of California, UC Press E-Books Collections, 1982-2004. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/9783845274485