Cover of book: Religionsvergleich
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Religionsvergleich

Ansätze, Kritik, Praxis
Authors:
Publisher:
 18.08.2022

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2022
Publication date
18.08.2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-6876-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-0971-2
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Studienkurs Religion
Language
German
Pages
191
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 8
  2. Zu diesem Buch No access 9 - 12
      1. Religionsvergleich als Vergleich von Religionen No access
      2. Religionsvergleich als der von Religionen betriebene Vergleich No access
      3. Religionsvergleich als Vergleich von Religion mit Nicht-Religion No access
        1. Teil 2 No access
      1. Religiöse Motive für den Religionsvergleich No access
      2. Nicht-religiöse Motive für den Religionsvergleich No access
      1. Religiöse Religionsvergleiche gab es schon immer No access
      2. Die Unterscheidung „wir–sie“ beruht auf einer Pluralitätsannahme No access
      3. Die Pluralität von Religionen – auch in vormoderner Zeit und außerhalb Europas No access
      4. Religion als Kategorie No access
      5. Säkulare Religionsvergleiche – innerhalb und außerhalb Europas No access
      1. Friedrich Max Müller No access
        1. Teil 2 No access
      3. Joachim Wach No access
      4. Mircea Eliade No access
      5. Jonathan Z. Smith No access
    3. 2.3. Marginalisierung und Wiederbelebung des Religionsvergleichs im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert No access
      1. Teil 2 No access
    2. 3.2. Essenzialisierung und Universalisierung No access
    3. 3.3. Generalisierung No access
    4. 3.4. Postmoderne und postkoloniale Kritik am Religionsvergleich No access
    1. 4.1. Unter der Motorhaube: Wie funktioniert Vergleichen? No access
      1. Empirische und theoretisch konstruierte Gegenstände No access
      2. Allgemein und spezifisch definierte Gegenstände No access
      3. Die Eingrenzung von Comparanda No access
      1. Unvergleichbarkeit No access
        1. Teil 2 No access
      1. Persönliche Faktoren No access
      2. Kulturelle Faktoren No access
      3. Akademische Faktoren No access
      1. Reflexivität No access
      2. Kontrollierte Entscheidungsfindung No access
    6. 4.6. Die theoretische Produktivität des Vergleichs No access
        1. Der spontan-assoziative Modus No access
        2. Der enzyklopädische Modus No access
        3. Der morphologische Modus No access
        4. Der evolutionäre Modus No access
        5. Der Similaritätsmodus No access
        6. Der Differenzmodus No access
        1. Der illuminative Modus No access
        2. Der taxonomische Modus No access
      1. Vergleich auf der Makroebene No access
      2. Vergleich auf der Mikroebene No access
        1. Teil 2 No access
      1. Der kontextuelle Analyserahmen und relationale Vergleiche No access
      2. Der interkulturelle Analyserahmen und analoge Vergleiche No access
      3. Der transhistorische Analyserahmen No access
      1. (1) Selektion No access
      2. (2) Beschreibung und Analyse No access
      3. (3) Gegenüberstellung No access
      4. (4) Neubeschreibung No access
      5. (5) Theoretisierung No access
      1. Der Anlass für den Religionsvergleich No access
      2. Selektion, Beschreibung, Analyse No access
      3. Gegenüberstellung, Neubeschreibung, Theoretisierung No access
      4. Kontrafaktische Reflexion No access
      5. Präsentation der Studie No access
        1. Teil 2 No access
      1. Vergleich als Wesensmerkmal des Fachs Religionswissenschaft No access
      2. Die Relevanz der vergleichenden Methode No access
      3. Die gesellschaftliche Relevanz des Religionsvergleichs No access
  9. Themenvorschläge für Seminararbeiten No access 177 - 178
  10. Literaturverzeichnis No access 179 - 186
  11. Sachregister No access 187 - 189
  12. Personenregister No access 190 - 190
  13. Bereits erschienen in der Reihe STUDIENKURS RELIGION No access 191 - 191

Bibliography (180)

  1. Ackerman, Robert (1987): J. G. Frazer. His Life and Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  2. Adams, Maurice/Hoecke, Mark van (Hrsg.) (2021a): Comparative Methods in Law, Humanities and Social Sciences. Cheltenham, Gloucestershire: Edward Elgar Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  3. Adams, Maurice/Hoecke, Mark van (2021b): Conclusion. Challenges of Comparison. In: Adams/Hoecke 2021a, S. 245–263. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  4. Alberts, Wanda (2007): Integrative Religious Education in Europe. A Study-of-Religions Approach, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  5. Alberts, Wanda (2008a): Didactics of the Study of Religions. In: Numen 55, H. 2, S. 300–334. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  6. Alberts, Wanda (2008b): Religionswissenschaftliche Fachdidaktik in europäischer Perspektive. In: Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 16, H. 1, S. 1–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  7. Alberts, Wanda/Junginger, Horst/Neef, Katharina/Wöstemeyer, Christina (Hrsg.) (2022): Handbuch Religionskunde, Berlin: De Gruyter i.E. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  8. Allen, Douglas (1994): Recent Defenders of Eliade: A Critical Evaluation. In: Religion 24, H. 4, S. 333–351. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  9. Asprem, Egil (2014): Beyond the West. Towards a New Comparativism in the Study of Esotericism. In: Correspondences 2, H. 1, S. 3–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  10. Bayly, Christopher Alan (2004): The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914. Global Connections and Comparisons, Malden, MA: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  11. Bergunder, Michael (2016): Comparison in the Maelstrom of Historicity: A Postcolonial Perspective on Comparative Religion. In: Schmidt-Leukel, Perry/Nehring, Andreas (Hrsg.): Interreligious Comparisons in Religious Studies and Theology: Comparison Revisited, London: Bloomsbury, S. 34–52. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  12. Berner, Ulrich (1981): Universalgeschichte und kreative Hermeneutik. Reflexionen anhand des Werkes von Mircea Eliade. In: Saeculum 32, S. 221–241. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  13. Berner, Ulrich (1997): Mircea Eliade (1907–1986). In: Michaels, Axel 1997, S. 343–353. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  14. Berner, Ulrich (2004): Africa and the Origin of the Science of Religion. Max Müller (1823–1900) and James George Frazer (1854–1941) on African Religions. In: Ludwig, Frieder/Adogame, Afe (Hrsg.): European Traditions in the Study of Religion in Africa, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, S. 141–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  15. Berner, Ulrich (2007): Aufklärung als Ursprung und Aufgabe der Religionswissenschaft. In: Koch, Anne (Hrsg.): Watchtower Religionswissenschaft: Standortbestimmungen im wissenschaftlichen Feld, Marburg: diagonal-Verlag, S. 161–180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  16. Berner, Ulrich (2020): Mountains as Sacred Spaces. In: Culture and Religion, 21, H. 1, S. 18–30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  17. Bernhardt, Reinhold/von Stosch, Klaus (Hrsg.) (2009a): Komparative Theologie: Interreligiöse Vergleiche als Weg der Religionstheologie, Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  18. Bernhardt, Reinhold/von Stosch, Klaus (2009b): Einleitung. In: Bernhardt, Reinhold/von Stosch, Klaus (2009a), S. 7–12. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  19. Biller, Peter (1985): Words and the Medieval Notion of ‚Religion‘. In: Journal of Ecclesiastical History 36, H. 3, S. 351–369. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  20. Bochinger, Christoph (2003): Religionsvergleiche in religionswissenschaftlicher und theologischer Perspektive. In: Kaelble, Hartmut/Schriewer, Jürgen (Hrsg.): Vergleich und Transfer: Komparatistik in den Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag, S. 251–281. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  21. Bornet, Philippe (2010): Rites et pratiques de l’hospitalité. Mondes juifs et indiens anciens, Stuttgart: Steiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  22. van den Bosch, Lourens Peter (2002): Friedrich Max Müller. A Life Devoted to the Humanities, Leiden: Brill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  23. Braun, Willi/McCutcheon, Russell T. (Hrsg.) (2018): Reading J. Z. Smith. Interviews & Essay, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  24. Candea, Matei (2019): Comparison in Anthropology. The Impossible Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  25. Capps, Walter H. (1995): Religious Studies. The Making of a Discipline, Minneapolis: Fortress Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  26. Casadio, Giovanni (2010): Religio versus Religion. In: Dijkstra, Jitse/Kroesen, Justin/Kuiper, Yme (Hrsg.): Myths, Martyrs, and Modernity. Studies in the History of Religions in Honour of Jan N. Bremmer, Leiden: Brill, 2010, S. 301–326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  27. Clooney, Francis X. (2005): Divine Mother, Blessed Mother. Hindu Goddesses and the Virgin Mary. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  28. Clooney, Francis X. (2008): Encountering the (Divine) Mother in Hindu and Christian Hymns. In: Religion and the Arts 12, S. 230–243 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  29. Clooney, Francis X. (2010): Comparative Theology. Deep Learning Across Religious Borders, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  30. Clooney, Francis X. (2013): Comparative Theology and Inter-Religious Dialogue. In: Cornille, Catherine (Hrsg.): The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Inter-Religious Dialogue, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. S. 51–63. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  31. Clooney, Francis X. (2018): Reading Religiously Across Religious Borders. A Method for Comparative Study. In: Freiberger, Oliver (Hrsg.): Methodical Aspects of Comparison, special issue of Religions 9, S. 1–12. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  32. Clooney, Francis X./von Stosch, Klaus (Hrsg.) (2017): How to Do Comparative Theology, New York: Fordham University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  33. Corbin, Juliet/Strauss, Anselm (2008): Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3. Aufl., Los Angeles: Sage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  34. Cornille, Catherine (2008): The Im-Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue, New York: Crossroad/Herder & Herder. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  35. Cornille, Catherine (2013): Conditions for Inter-Religious Dialogue. In: Cornille, Catherine (Hrsg.): The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Inter-Religious Dialogue, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. S. 20–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  36. Crews, Emily/McCutcheon, Russell T. (Hrsg.) (2020): Remembering J. Z. Smith. A Career and Its Consequence. London: Equinox. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  37. Deeg, Max/Freiberger, Oliver/Kleine, Christoph (Hrsg.) (2019): Religionsbegegnung in der asiatischen Religionsgeschichte. Kritische Reflexionen über ein etabliertes Konzept, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  38. Deeg, Max/Freiberger, Oliver/Kleine, Christoph/Kollmar-Paulenz, Karénina (Hrsg.) (in Vorb.): Grenzen der Religion. Säkularität in der Asiatischen Religionsgeschichte, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  39. Della Porta, Donatella (2008): Comparative Analysis. Case-oriented Versus Variable-oriented Research. In: Della Porta, Donatella/Keating, Michael (Hrsg.): Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 198–222. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  40. Doniger, Wendy (1999): Splitting the Difference: Gender and Myth in Ancient Greece and India, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  41. Dubuisson, Daniel (2003): The Western Construction of Religion. Myths, Knowledge, and Ideology, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  42. Eliade, Mircea (1976): Ein neuer Humanismus. In: Die Sehnsucht nach dem Ursprung. Von den Quellen der Humanität, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, S. 17–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  43. Eliade, Mircea (1990): Das Heilige und das Profane. Vom Wesen des Religiösen, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  44. Eliade, Mircea (1998): Die Religionen und das Heilige. Elemente der Religionsgeschichte, Frankfurt/M.: Insel. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  45. Fitzgerald, Timothy (2000): The Ideology of Religious Studies, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  46. Fitzgerald, Timothy (2007): Discourse on Civility and Barbarity. A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  47. Flasche, Rainer (1978): Die Religionswissenschaft Joachim Wachs. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  48. Flasche, Rainer (1997): Joachim Wach (1898–1955). In: Michaels, Axel (1997), S. 290–302. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  49. Frank, Katharina/Bochinger, Christoph (2008): Religious Education in Switzerland as a Field of Work for the Study of Religions. Empirical Results and Theoretical Reflections. In: Numen 55, H. 2, S. 183–217. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  50. Frank, Katharina/Coste, Hélène (2017): Religionswissenschaft als Grundlagenstudium. Skizze eines empiriebasierten Kompetenz- und Ausbildungsmodells. In: Zeitschrift für Religionskunde 5, S. 22–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  51. Frazer, James George (1894): Taboo. In: Encyclopedia Britannica, 9. Aufl., Bd. 23, Chicago: Werner, S. 16–18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  52. Frazer, James George (1922). The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion, Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth (Nachdruck 1993). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  53. Frazer, James George (1994): The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion. A new abridgement from the second and third editions, hrsg, von Robert Fraser, London: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  54. Freiberger, Oliver (2013): Religionen und Religion in der Konstruktion des frühen Buddhismus. In: Schalk, Peter et al. (2013). S. 15–41. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  55. Freiberger, Oliver (2009): Der Askesediskurs in der Religionsgeschichte. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung brahmanischer und frühchristlicher Texte, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  56. Freiberger, Oliver (2010): Locating the Ascetic’s Habitat. Toward a Micro-Comparison of Religious Discourses. In: History of Religions 50, H. 2, S. 162–192. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  57. Freiberger, Oliver (2018): Freedom for the Tertium. On Conditions and Provisions for Comparison in the Study of Religion. In: History of Religions 57, H. 3, S. 288–305. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  58. Freiberger, Oliver (2019): Considering Comparison. A Method for Religious Studies, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  59. Freiberger, Oliver (2020): J. Z. Smith on Comparison. Insights and Appropriations. In: Crews, Emily/McCutcheon, Russell T. (2020), S. 46–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  60. Freiberger, Oliver/Kleine, Christoph (2015): Buddhismus. Handbuch und kritische Einführung. 2., überarb. Aufl., Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  61. Freidenreich, David M. (2004): Comparisons Compared. A Methodological Survey of Comparisons of Religion from ‘A Magic Dwells’ to A Magic Still Dwells. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 16, S. 80–101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  62. Freidenreich, David M. (2011): Foreigners and Their Food. Constructing Otherness in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Law, Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  63. Freidenreich, David M. (2018): Against the Grain and Over the Line. Reflections on Comparative Methodology. In: Freiberger, Oliver (Hrsg.): Methodical Aspects of Comparison, special issue of Religions 9, S. 1–13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  64. Gilhus, Ingvild Sælid (1997): Laughing Gods, Weeping Virgins. Laughter in the History of Religion. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  65. Grieve, Pete (2018): Jonathan Z. Smith (1938−2017). The College’s Iconoclastic, Beloved, Chainsmoking Dean. In: The Chicago Maroon, March 23, 2018, https://www.chicagomaroon.com/article/2018/3/23/jonathan-z-smith-dean-of-college-university-of-chicago/ (10.5.2022). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  66. Gustafson, Hans (Hrsg.) (2020): Interreligious Studies. Dispatches from an Emerging Field, Waco: Baylor University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  67. Goodman, Hananya (1994): Between Jerusalem and Benares. Comparative Studies in Judaism and Hinduism, Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  68. Green, Nancy L. (2004): Forms of Comparison. In: Cohen, Deborah/O’Connor, Maura (Hrsg.): Comparison and History. Europe in Cross-National Perspective, New York: Routledge, S. 41–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  69. Haupt, Heinz-Gerhard/Kocka, Jürgen (2004): Comparative History. Methods, Aims, Problems. In: Cohen, Deborah/O’Connor, Maura (Hrsg.): Comparison and History. Europe in Cross-National Perspective, New York: Routledge, S. 23–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  70. Heiler, Friedrich (1961): Erscheinungsformen und Wesen der Religion, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  71. Herzfeld, Michael (2001): Performing Comparisons. Ethnography, Globetrotting, and the Spaces of Social Knowledge. In: Journal of Anthropological Research 57, H. 3, S. 259–276. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  72. Hetmanczyk, Philipp/Schellenberg, Urs (2022): Der Vergleich aus fachwissenschaftlicher und fachdidaktischer Perspektive. Normative und analytische Problemstellungen. In: Zeitschrift für Religionskunde 10, S. 43–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  73. Hewitt, Marsha (1996): How New Is the ‘New Comparativism’? Difference, Dialectics, and World-Making. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 8, H. 1, S. 15–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  74. Hoffmann, Solvejg (o.J.). Redewendung Äpfel mit Birnen vergleichen. In: GEOlino, https://www.geo.de/geolino/redewendungen/1571-rtkl-redewendung-aepfel-mit-birnen-vergleichen (15.3.2022). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  75. Holdrege, Barbara A. (1996): Veda and Torah. Transcending the Spirituality of Scripture, Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  76. Hughes, Aaron W. (2017): Comparison. A Critical Primer, Sheffield: Equinox. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  77. Hughes, Aaron W. (2018): Response. In: Stoddard, Brad (Hrsg.): Method Today. Redescribing Approaches to the Study of Religion, Sheffield: Equinox. S. 70–75. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  78. Jensen, Jeppe Sinding (2004): Why Magic? It’s Just Comparison. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 16, S. 45–60. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  79. Kaelble, Hartmut (1999): Der historische Vergleich. Eine Einführung zum 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, Frankfurt am Main: Campus. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  80. Katz, Nathan (2000): Who are the Jews of India? Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  81. Katz, Nathan/Chakravarti, Ranabir/Sinha, Braj M./Weil, Shalva (Hrsg.) (2007): Indo-Judaic Studies in the Twenty-First Century. A View from the Margin, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  82. Kedar, Benjamin Z. (Hrsg.) (2009): Explorations in Comparative History. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Magnes Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  83. Kiblinger, Kristin Beise (2008): Buddhist Stances Towards Others. Types, Examples, Considerations. In: Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (Hrsg.): Buddhist Attitudes to Other Religions, St. Ottilien: EOS, S. 24–46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  84. King, Richard (1999): Orientalism and Religion. Postcolonial Theory, India and „the Mystic East“, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  85. Kippenberg, Hans G. (1997): Die Entdeckung der Religionsgeschichte. Religionswissenschaft und Moderne, München: Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  86. Kleine, Christoph (1998): Buddhismus ohne Buddhisten oder: Die wahre Religion Gautamas als orientalistisches Phantasieprodukt. In: Spirita 12, H. 1, S. 12–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  87. Kleine, Christoph (2018): The Secular Ground Bass of Pre-modern Japan Reconsidered. Reflections upon the Buddhist Trajectories towards Secularity. In: Working Paper Series of the HCAS „Multiple Secularities – Beyond the West, Beyond Modernities“ 5, Leipzig: Universität Leipzig. https://www.multiple-secularities.de/media/workingpaper_5_kleine_web.pdf (10.5.2022). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  88. Klimkeit, Hans-Joachim (1997): Friedrich Max Müller (1823–1900). In: Michaels, Axel (1997), S. 29–40. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  89. Kripal, Jeffrey J. (2014): Comparing Religions. Coming to Terms, Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  90. Laack, Isabel (2014): Lernziele des religionswissenschaftlichen Studiums. Eine Anregung zur Umsetzung hochschuldidaktischer Erkenntnisse. In: Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 22, H. 2, S. 375–401. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  91. Laack, Isabel/Radermacher, Martin/Weiß, Sabrina (2017): Hochschuldidaktik in der Religionswissenschaft. Eine Einleitung zum Themenheft. In: Zeitschrift für Religionskunde 5, S. 7–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  92. Lang, Andrew (1901): Mr. Frazer’s Theory of the Crucifixion. In: The Fortnightly Review 69, S. 650–662. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  93. Lehrich, Christopher I. (2021): Jonathan Z. Smith on Religion. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  94. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim (1825): Rettung des Hieronymus Cardanus. In: Sämmtliche Schriften, Bd. 4, Berlin: Voffischen, S. 129–167. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  95. Lincoln, Bruce (2018): Apples and Oranges. Explorations In, On, and With Comparison, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  96. Lubin, Timothy (2002): The Virtuosic Exegesis of the Brahmavādin and the Rabbi. In: Numen 49, H. 4, S. 427–459. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  97. Mack, Burton (1996): On Redescribing Christian Origins. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 8, H. 3, S. 247–269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  98. Manning, Christel J. (1999): God Gave Us the Right. Conservative Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, and Orthodox Jewish Women Grapple with Feminism, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  99. Mensching, Gustav (1959): Die Religion. Erscheinungsformen, Strukturtypen und Lebensgesetze, Stuttgart: Schwab. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  100. Michaels, Axel (Hrsg.) (1997): Klassiker der Religionswissenschaft. Von Friedrich Schleiermacher bis Mircea Eliade, München: Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  101. McCarthy, Kate (2018): (Inter)Religious Studies. Making a Home in the Secular Academy. In: Patel, Eboo/Peace, Jennifer Howe/Silverman, Noah J. (2018), S. 2–15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  102. McClymond, Kathryn (2008): Beyond Sacred Violence. A Comparative Study of Sacrifice, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  103. McClymond, Kathryn (2018): Comparison as Conversation and Craft. In: Freiberger, Oliver (Hrsg.): Methodical Aspects of Comparison, special issue of Religions 9, S. 1–9. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  104. McIntosh, Peggy (1998): White Privilege. Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack. In: McGoldrick, Monica (Hrsg.): Re-visioning Family Therapy. Race, Culture, and Gender in Clinical Practice, New York: Guilford Press, S. 147–152. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  105. Mohn, Jürgen (2009): Komparatistik als Position und Gegenstand der Religionswissenschaft. In: Bernhardt, Reinhold/von Stosch, Klaus (2009a), S. 225–276. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  106. Molendijk, Ariel L. (2016): Friedrich Max Müller and the Sacred Books of the East, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  107. Müller, Friedrich Max (1872): Lectures on the Science of Religion; with a paper on Buddhist Nihilism, and a translation of the Dhammapada or „Path of Virtue“, New York: Scribner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  108. Neville, Roberts Cummings (2008): Ritual and Deference. Extending Chinese Philosophy in a Comparative Context, Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  109. Nhat Hanh, Thich (1995): Living Buddha, Living Christ, New York: Riverhead. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  110. Norris, Pippa/Inglehart, Ronald (2004): Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide, New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  111. Osterhammel, Jürgen (2014): The Transformation of the World. A Global History of the Nineteenth Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  112. Otto, Rudolf (1917): Das Heilige. Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen, Breslau: Trewendt et Garnier. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  113. Paden, William E. (1988): Religious Worlds. The Comparative Study of Religion, Boston: Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  114. Paden, William E. (1996a): Elements of a New Comparativism. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 8, H. 1, S. 5–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  115. Paden, William E. (1996b): A New Comparativism. Reply to the Panelists. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 8, H. 1, S. 37–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  116. Pasche Guignard, Florence (2015): Fight, Flight, Freeze, Fool, or Pray. Comparative Perspectives on Gender, Violence, and Religion. In: Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 23, H. 2, S. 285–319. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  117. Patel, Eboo/Peace, Jennifer Howe/Silverman, Noah J. (Hrsg.) (2018): Interreligious/Interfaith Studies. Defining a New Field. Boston: Beacon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  118. Pennington, Brian K. (2020): (Neo)Liberal Challenges. In: Gustafson, Hans (2020), S. 178–184. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  119. Patton, Kimberley C. (2000): Juggling Torches. Why We Still Need Comparative Religion. In: Patton, Kimberley C./Ray, Benjamin C. (2000), S. 153–171. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  120. Patton, Kimberley C. (2009): Religion of the Gods. Ritual, Paradox, and Reflexivity, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  121. Patton, Kimberley C./Ray, Benjamin C. (Hrsg.) (2000): A Magic Still Dwells. Comparative Religion in the Postmodern Age, Berkeley: University of California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  122. Platvoet, Jan G. (1982): Comparing Religions, A Limitative Approach. An Analysis of Akan, Para- Creole, and IFO- Sananda Rites and Prayers, The Hague: Mouton. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  123. Poole, Fitz John Porter (1986): Metaphors and Maps. Towards Comparison in the Anthropology of Religion. In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion 54, H. 3, S. 411–457. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  124. Prothero, Stephen (2008): Religious Literacy. What Every American Needs to Know – And Doesn't, New York: HarperOne. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  125. Prothero, Stephen (2010): God Is Not One. The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World, And Why Their Differences Matter, New York: HarperOne. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  126. Prothero, Stephen (2020): Religion Matters. An Introduction to the World’s Religions, New York: W.W. Norton. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  127. Pye, Michael (Übers.) (1990): Tominaga Nakamoto, Emerging from Meditation, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  128. Pye, Michael (2003): Modern Japan and the Science of Religions. In: Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 15, S. 1–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  129. Ragin, Charles C. (1992): Introduction: Cases of ‘What Is a Case?’. In: Ragin, Charles C./Becker, Howard S. (1992), S. 1–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  130. Ragin, Charles C./ Becker, Howard S. (Hrsg.) (1992): What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  131. Rennie, Bryan S. (1996): Reconstructing Eliade. Making Sense of Religion, Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  132. Rondolino, Massimo A. (2015): Prolegomena to a Comparative Reading of The Major Life of St. Francis and The Life of Milarepa. In: Buddhist-Christian Studies 35, S. 163–180. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  133. Rondolino, Massimo A. (2017): Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Hagiographical Strategies. A Comparative Study of the „Standard Lives“ of St. Francis and Milarepa, London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  134. Rudolph, Kurt (1997): Die vergleichende Methode in den Kulturwissenschaften und die Religionswissenschaft. In: Klimkeit, Hans-Joachim (Hrsg.): Vergleichen und Verstehen in der Religionswissenschaft. Vorträge der Jahrestagung der DVRG vom 4. bis 6. Oktober 1995 in Bonn, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, S. 161–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  135. Rustin, Michael (2016): The Neoliberal University and its Alternatives. In: Soundings 63, S. 147–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  136. Schalk, Peter/Deeg, Max/Freiberger, Oliver/Kleine, Christoph/van Nahl, Astrid (Hrsg.) (2013): Religion in Asien? Studien zur Anwendbarkeit des Religionsbegriffs, Uppsala: Uppsala University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  137. Schimmel, Annemarie (1960): Summary of the Discussion. In: Numen 7, S. 235–239. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  138. Schmidt-Leukel, Perry (2022): Das himmlische Geflecht. Buddhismus und Christentum – ein anderer Vergleich, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  139. Schopen, Gregory (1997): On Monks, Nuns, and „Vulgar“ Practices. The Introduction of the Image Cult into Indian Buddhism. In: Bones, Stones, and Buddhist Monks. Collected Papers on the Archaeology, Epigraphy, and Texts of Monastic Buddhism in India, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, S. 238–257. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  140. Schwab, Andreas (2020): Fremde Religion in Herodots „Historien“. Religiöse Mehrdimensionalität bei Persern und Ägyptern, Stuttgart: Steiner Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  141. Seiwert, Hubert (2020): Theory of Religion and Historical Research. A Critical Realist Perspective on the Study of Religion as an Empirical Discipline. In: Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 28, H. 2, S. 207–236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  142. Shankman, Steven/Durrant, Stephen W. (Hrsg.) (2002): Early China/Ancient Greece. Thinking Through Comparisons, Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  143. Sharma, Arvind (2005): Religious Studies and Comparative Methodology. The Case for Reciprocal Illumination, Albany: State University of New York Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  144. Sharpe, Eric J. (1986): Comparative Religion. A History. 2. Aufl., La Salle: Open Court. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  145. Sherry, John F./Kozinets, Robert V. (2003): Sacred Iconography in Secular Space. Altars, Alters, and Alterity at the Burning Man Project. In: Otnes, Cele C./Lowrey, Tina M. (Hrsg.): Contemporary Consumption Rituals. A Research Anthology, New York: Psychology Press, S. 291–311. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  146. Shushan, Gregory (2009). Conceptions of the Afterlife in Early Civilizations. Universalism, Constructivism and Near-Death Experience, London: Continuum. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  147. Simmons, Erica S./Rush Smith, Nicholas (Hrsg.) (2021): Rethinking Comparison. Innovative Methods for Qualitative Political Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  148. Smith, Jonathan Z. (1978): Adde Parvum Parvo Magnus Acervus Erit. In: Map Is Not Territory. Studies in the History of Religions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, S. 240–264. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  149. Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982a): Imagining Religion. From Babylon to Jonestown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  150. Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982b): In Comparison a Magic Dwells. In: Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982a), S. 19–35. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  151. Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982c): The Devil in Mr. Jones. In: Smith, Jonathan Z. (1982a), S. 102–120. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  152. Smith, Jonathan Z. (1990): On Comparison. In: Drudgery Divine. On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, S. 36–53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  153. Smith, Jonathan Z. (2000): Classification. In: Braun, Willi/McCutcheon, Russell T. (Hrsg.): Guide to the Study of Religion, London: Cassell, S. 35–44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  154. Smith, Jonathan Z. (2000b): The „End“ of Comparison. Redescription and Rectification. In: Patton, Kimberly C./Ray, Benjamin C. (2000), S. 237–241. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  155. Stausberg, Michael (2021): Comparison. In: Stausberg, Michael/Engler, Steven (Hrsg.): Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion, 2. Aufl., Abingdon: Routledge, S. 15–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  156. von Stosch, Klaus (2012): Komparative Theologie als Wegweiser in der Welt der Religionen, Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  157. von Stosch, Klaus (2021): Einführung in die Komparative Theologie, Paderborn: Schöningh. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  158. Strübing, Jörg (2014): Grounded Theory. Zur sozialtheoretischen und epistemologischen Fundierung eines pragmatistischen Forschungsstils. 3., überarb. und erw. Aufl., Wiesbaden: Springer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  159. Tanner, Jeremy (2009): Ancient Greece, Early China. Sino-Hellenic Studies and Comparative Approaches to the Classical World. A Review Article. In: Journal of Hellenic Studies 129, S. 89–109. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  160. Taves, Ann (2009): Religious Experience Reconsidered. A Building- Block Approach to the Study of Religion and Other Special Things, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  161. Taves, Ann (2016): Revelatory Events. Three Case Studies of the Emergence of New Spiritual Paths. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  162. Thiede, Werner (2005): Buddha und Jesus: Gemeinsamkeiten und Differenzen. In: Kerygma und Dogma 51, S. 33–51. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  163. Thomas, Paul Brian (2008): The Riddle of Ishtar’s Shoes. The Religious Significance of the Footprints at ῾Ain Dara from a Comparative Perspective. In: Journal of Religious History 32, H. 3, S. 303–319. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  164. Tietz, Christiane (2009): Dialogkonzepte in der Komparativen Theologie. In: Bernhardt, Reinhold/von Stosch, Klaus (2009a), S. 315–338. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  165. Trainor, Kevin (2010): Pars pro toto. On Comparing Relic Practices. In: Numen 57, S. 267–283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  166. Tylor, Edward B. (1958): The Origins of Culture. New York: Harper (Erstpublikation als Bd. 1 von Primitive Culture, London: Murray, 1871). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  167. Urban, Hugh B. (2000): Making a Place to Take a Stand. Jonathan Z. Smith and the Politics and Poetics of Comparison. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 12, S. 339–378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  168. Urban, Hugh B. (2004): Power Still Dwells. The Ethics and Politics of Comparison in A Magic Still Dwells. In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 16, S. 24–35. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  169. Waardenburg, Jacques (1999): Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion. Aims, Methods and Theories of Research, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  170. Wach, Joachim (1924): Religionswissenschaft. Prolegomena zu ihrer wissenschaftstheoretischen Grundlegung, Leipzig: Hinrichs. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  171. Weber, Max (1922): Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  172. Weber, Ralph (2014): Comparative Philosophy and the Tertium. Comparing What with What, and in What Respect? In: Dao. A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13, S. 151–171. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  173. Wedemeyer, Christian K. (2010): Introduction I. Two Scholars, a “School,” and a Conference. In: Wedemeyer, Christian K./Doniger, Wendy (Hrsg.): Hermeneutics, Politics, and the History of Religions. The Contested Legacies of Joachim Wach and Mircea Eliade, New York: Oxford University Press. S. xv–xxvi. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  174. Weiß, Sabrina/Radermacher, Martin (2015): Handlungsorientierte Didaktik in der Religionswissenschaft. Von den Zielen zu den Methoden. In: Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 23, H. 2, S. 371–397. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  175. White, L. Michael/Fitzgerald, John T. (2003): Quod Est Comparandum. The Problem of Parallels. In: Fitzgerald, John T./Olbricht, Thomas H./White, L. Michael (Hrsg.): Early Christianity and Classical Culture. Comparative Studies in Honor of Abraham J. Malherbe, Leiden: Brill, S. 13–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  176. Wießner, Gernot (1994): Religionswissenschaft. In: Campenhausen, Alexander Freiherr von/Wießner, Gernot: Kirchenrecht – Religionswissenschaft, Grundkurs Theologie 10,1, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, S. 65–178. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  177. Wieviorka, Michel (1992): Case Studies. History or Sociology? In: Ragin, Charles C./Becker, Howard S. (1992), S. 159–172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  178. Williams, Raymond (1961): Education and British Society. In: The Long Revolution, London: Chatto and Windus, S. 125–155. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  179. Wißmann, Hans (1997): James George Frazer (1854–1941). In: Michaels, Axel (1997), S. 77–89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712
  180. Yengoyan, Aram A. (2006): Introduction. On the Issue of Comparison. In: Yengoyan, Aram A. (Hrsg.): Modes of Comparison. Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, S. 1–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748909712

Similar publications

from the topics "Theological Ethics", "History of Religion & Church History"
Cover of book: Ethik der Kryptographie
Book Titles Full access
Laurence Lerch
Ethik der Kryptographie
Cover of book: Ideale der Menschlichkeit
Book Titles No access
Paul R. Tarmann
Ideale der Menschlichkeit
Cover of book: Cultivating Character
Book Titles Full access
Tuba Işık
Cultivating Character
Cover of book: „… niemanden vor dem Segensprechen herauslassen“
Book Titles No access
Thomas Fischbacher, Johann Hafner
„… niemanden vor dem Segensprechen herauslassen“
Cover of book: Vertrauen und Risiko
Edited Book No access
Martin Barth, Gregor Maria Hoff
Vertrauen und Risiko

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex