The EU and National Constitutional Law

Peter M. Huber

doi:10.5771/9783415050341

Keywords

Search publication

Bibliographic data

Copyright year: 2014
ISBN-Print: 978-3-415-04828-7
ISBN-Online: 978-3-415-05034-1
Publisher: Boorberg, Stuttgart/München
Series: Münchener Reden zur Europäischen Integration
Volume: 6
Language: English
Pages: 208
Product type: Book Titles

Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages 3 - 6
Preface No access Pages 7 - 10
1. 1. I. Introduction No access
  2. II. European Union Law under review of the Federal Constitutional Court No access
  3. 1. 1. Requirements of the Basic Law No access
    2. 2. Jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court No access
  4. 1. 1. Requirements of the Basic Law No access
    2. 1. a) Interpretation of the constitutional restrictions regarding European Integration No access
      2. aa) Reservation of control concerning constitutional limits of integration No access
        bb) Identity control and ultra vires control No access
  5. V. Balancing the requirements of European Union Law and German Constitutional Law No access
  6. VI. Conclusion No access
2. 1. I. Introduction: The communication between the ECJ and the national judiciaries No access
  2. 1. a) Precedence and the protection of fundamental rights No access
    2. b) The EU and its Member States: the last word on the question of competences No access
  3. III. The Lisbon Treaty Decision No access
  4. IV. Conclusion No access
  5. Postscipt No access
3. 1. I. Introduction No access
  2. 1. 1. Pacta sunt servanda No access
    2. 1. a) The European Union's waiver to invoke Member States duties to adapt international agreements to European Union law No access
      2. aa) Previous legal situation under EU law No access
        bb) Changes made by the Lisbon Treaty No access
  3. III. Conclusion No access
1. 1. I. Introduction No access
  2. II. The Lisbon judgment No access
  3. 1. 1. The jurisprudence of the EU courts No access
    2. 2. Perspective for Improvement No access
  4. 1. 1. Procedural Restraints No access
    2. 2. Strict interpretation of Article 83 TFEU No access
  5. V. Conclusion No access
2. 1. I. Introduction No access
  2. 1. 1. Criminal Law in the First Pillar No access
    2. 2. Criminal Law in the Third Pillar No access
  3. III. The Treaty of Lisbon: Horizontal Changes No access
  4. 1. 1. a) Measures in the Field of Mutual Legal Assistance (Paragraph 1) No access
      2. b) Harmonisation of the Member States' Laws of Criminal Procedure (Paragraph 2) No access
    2. 1. a) Particularly Serious Crime with a Cross-Border Dimension (Paragraph 1) No access
      2. b) Annex-Competence (Paragraph 2) No access
    3. 3. The 'Emergency Brakes' in Art. 82 (3) and Art. 83 (3) No access
    4. 1. a) Fraud Affecting the Financial Interests of the European Union, Art. 325 (4) TFEU No access
      2. b) Customs Cooperation, Art. 33 TFEU No access
      3. c) Trafficking in Human Beings, Art. 79 (2) lit. d TFEU No access
    5. 5. Possibility to Establish a European Public Prosecutor No access
  5. V.Conclusion – “I am a rock, I am an island”? No access
1. 1. 1. Fundamental Rights and the Internal Market No access
  2. 1. Does the Charter apply? No access
    2. Derogations harmonised No access
    3. References to Union law and national laws in the Charter No access
  3. 3. Who decides whether a national measure is justified by fundamental rights protection? No access
2. 1. A. Introduction No access
  2. 1. 1. 1. Compliance with Strasbourg: the example of Roquette Frères No access
      2. 2. Reluctance towards the ECtHR: the example of Emesa Sugar No access
    2. 1. 1. Benchmark judgment in Bosphorus No access
      2. 2. Denying jurisdiction: the cases of Boivin and Connolly No access
      3. 3. Accepting jurisdiction: the case of Kokkelvisserij No access
  3. C. Conditions for the EU's accession to the ECHR No access
  4. 1. I. Applications subsequent to direct actions in EU courts No access
    2. 1. 1. Correct addressing No access
      2. 2. Exhaustion of domestic remedies No access
      3. 3. Consequences of a condemnation No access
  5. E. Outlook No access
3. 1. I. No access
  2. II. No access
  3. III. No access
  4. IV. No access
1. 1. 1. 1. Motives for the Reform of Subsidiarity Control No access
    2. 2. Ex ante and ex post Control in the Subsidiarity Protocol No access
  2. II. Implementation into German law No access
  3. 1. 1. The Subsidiarity Action Compared to the Dispute between Supreme Federal Bodies No access
    2. 2. The Subsidiarity Action Compared to the Federal Judicial Review No access
  4. IV. The Admissibility of the Subsidiarity Action No access
  5. V. The Merits of the Subsidiarity Action No access
  6. VI. Conclusion No access
2. 1. National Legislatures in the European Union: Defining the Roles No access
  2. 1. 1. European Commission: The Initiator of Written Communication No access
    2. 2. European Parliament: Facilitating Inter-Parliamentary Communication No access
    3. 3. The Council: Tête-à-Tête Conversation at the National Level No access
  3. 1. 1. Access to Drafts – Addressing a Wrong Target? No access
    2. 2. Subsidiarity Checks as a Secondary Goal? No access
  4. Conclusion No access
3. 1. I. Introduction No access
  2. II. Two Questions No access
  3. III. Founding Constitutional Principles No access
  4. IV. Equal Liberty No access
  5. V. Fundamental Rights No access
  6. VI. Democracy No access
  7. VII. The Rule of Law No access
  8. VIII. The Dualist Structure of EU Law No access
  9. IX. Conclusion: Uniformity and Mutual Respect No access
4. 1. Introduction No access
  2. Parliamentary Sovereignty No access
  3. The Rule of Law No access
  4. The Crown No access
  5. 1. Reception of European Law No access
    2. Sovereignty No access
    3. The Rule of Law No access
    4. The Crown No access
    5. The Human Rights Act No access
    6. The Growing Maturity of Public Law No access
  6. Lasting and Concluding Legacies No access