Cover of book: Human Rights and Positive Obligations to Healthcare
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

Human Rights and Positive Obligations to Healthcare

Reading the European Convention on Human Rights through Joseph Raz's Theory of Rights
Authors:
Publisher:
 2019

Summary

Dieses Buch richtet sich an Wissenschaftler, die zur Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention forschen, und an jene, die an Rechtsphilosophie interessiert sind. Es richtet sich auch an Richter und Anwälte, die mit der EMRK und insbesondere der Rechtsprechung zum Schutz der Gesundheit befasst sind. Studierenden bietet das Buch die Möglichkeit, ihre rechtsphilosophischen Kenntnisse der Menschenrechte und der EMRK zu vertiefen.

Das Buch verfolgt drei Ziele: Erstens soll Joseph Raz´ „Doppeldimension der Menschenrechte“ als Theorie eines mittleren Wegs erörtert werden, die Richtern helfen kann, soziale Aspekte von Menschenrechten zu prüfen. Zweitens wird argumentiert, dass Joseph Raz´ Rechtsphilosophie als Ansatz der „Doppeldimension der Menschenrechte“ und nicht als Interessentheorie verstanden werden sollte. Drittens soll dieses Buch sich nicht nur mit Menschenrechtstheorie befassen, sondern untersuchen, wie die Rechte der EMRK in der Rechtsprechung angewandt und interpretiert werden.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Copyright year
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5852-4
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9985-3
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Nomos Universitätsschriften - Politik
Volume
196
Language
English
Pages
267
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 14
    1. 1.1 Summary of the main arguments No access
    2. 1.2 Structure No access
    3. 1.3 Scope No access
    4. 1.4 Methodology No access
      1. 1.5.1 State of the art in international law and in political science No access
      2. 1.5.2 State of the art and positive obligations to health care No access
    6. 1.6 Why Joseph Raz’s theory of rights? No access
      1. 2.1.1 Legal formalism No access
      2. 2.1.2 American legal realism No access
      1. 2.2.1 Natural law theory No access
        1. Jeremy Bentham and the ruling theory of law No access
        2. H.L.A. Hart and open-textured language of the law No access
        3. The hermeneutic approach No access
        4. Non-positivism: Ronald Dworkin and law as a practice of interpretation No access
      1. 2.3.1 Natural theories of rights No access
      2. 2.3.2 Ronald Dworkin’s natural theory of rights No access
      3. 2.3.3 Deontological, rights-based theories and consequentialist accounts of human rights No access
      4. 2.3.4 Contingent/constructed/relative rights and objective rights No access
      5. 2.3.5 Charles Taylor’s communitarian account of human rights No access
      1. 3.1.1 Taking the formal characteristics of the Convention seriously No access
      2. 3.1.2 Positive obligations and ECtHR case law No access
    2. 3.2 Theoretical disputes No access
    3. 3.3 The two-stage analysis of human rights: a bifurcated approach No access
    1. 4.1 Joseph Raz and legal positivism No access
    2. 4.2 The notion of human rights in Joseph Raz’s approach No access
        1. Values and rights No access
        2. Overreaching and traditional theories No access
        3. “Universality” as the enemy of human rights No access
      2. 4.3.2 Anti-universality: Political conception, social relativism and anti-moral relativism No access
    4. 4.4 The “why-dimension” of rights No access
    5. 4.5 Rights and interests No access
      1. 4.6.1 Contingent goods, inherent public goods or collective goods No access
      2. 4.6.2 The common good: Finnis’s approach and its relationship with Razian collective goods No access
      3. 4.6.3 Practical reason for Finnis and Raz No access
      4. 4.6.4 Common good, solidarity and utilitarianism No access
      5. 4.6.5 Traditional liberal rights and the common good No access
      1. 4.7.1 The criticism of liberalism by communitarians No access
      2. 4.7.2 Rights: Autonomy, options and collective goods No access
      1. 4.8.1 Rights and duties No access
      2. 4.8.2 Creating new duties: the dynamic aspect of rights No access
      1. 4.9.1 Raz’s rights and Taylor’s communitarian rights No access
    1. 5.1 Introduction No access
    2. 5.2 Expulsion, detention and healthcare: Positive obligations and Article 3 of the ECHR (an overview) No access
    3. 5.3 Article 3 of the ECHR: its general characteristics and its relationship to healthcare No access
      1. 5.4.1 Expulsion and intentional acts or omissions No access
      2. 5.4.2 Expulsion and “minimum level of severity” No access
      3. 5.4.3 Expulsion and the “threefold condition for exceptional circumstances/humanitarian reasons” No access
      4. 5.4.4 Expulsion, Article 3 of the ECHR and implied restrictions No access
      5. 5.4.5 Expulsion and the social aspects of the ECHR No access
      1. 5.5.1 Detention, Article 3 and the “minimum level of severity” No access
      2. 5.5.2 Detention and “intentional acts or omissions” No access
    6. 5.6 Overview of the ECtHR case law relating to Article 3 of the ECHR No access
    7. 5.7 General characteristics of Article 8 of the ECHR and its relationship with healthcare and positive obligations No access
    8. 5.8 Interference by public authorities and Article 8 of the ECHR No access
    9. 5.9 Article 8 of the ECHR and the minimum threshold of severity No access
      1. 5.10.1 Medical care treatment No access
      2. 5.10.2 Expulsion No access
      3. 5.10.3 Environmental protection No access
    11. 5.11 Overview of the ECtHR case law relating to Article 8 of the ECHR No access
    1. 6.1 Introduction No access
      1. 6.2.1 The absence of healthcare and inhuman treatment No access
      2. 6.2.2 Positive obligation to healthcare, physical well-being and Razian autonomy-based freedom No access
      3. 6.2.3 Right-holders: Physically present and members of the same moral community No access
      4. 6.2.4 Balancing interests and financial restrictions No access
      5. 6.2.5 Democracy as a collective good No access
      6. 6.2.6 “Human rights inflation”? No access
    3. 6.3 Overview of chapter six No access
    1. 7.1 Raz’s theory of rights: A synopsis No access
    2. 7.2 Critique of Joseph Raz’s account of rights and “research desiderata” for further research No access
    3. 7.3 Findings of the study and concluding remarks No access
  9. Bibliography No access 255 - 264
  10. European Court of Human Rights (and former European Commission of Human Rights) Case Law No access 265 - 267

Bibliography (180)

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. Homo sacer: Κυρίαρχη εξουσία και γυμνή ζωή. (μτφρ. Παναγιώτης Τσιαμούρας). Αθήνα: Scripta, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  2. Akandji-Kombe, Jean-François. “Positive obligations under the European Convention: A guide to the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights.” Human rights handbooks, no. 7, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2007. Open Google Scholar
  3. Alexy, Robert. A theory of Constitutional Rights, trans. Julian Rivers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  4. Alexy, Robert. A theory of Constitutional Rights “On the concept and the nature of law.” Ratio Juris 21, no.3 (2008): 281-299. Open Google Scholar
  5. Αριστοτέλης [Aristotle]. Ηθικά Νικομάχεια [Nicomachean Ethics]. (μτφρ. Φιλολογική ομάδα Κάκτου). Αθήνα: Κάκτος, 1993. Open Google Scholar
  6. Atria, Fernando. “Social Rights, Social Contract, Socialism.” Social & Legal Studies 24, no. 4 (2015): 598–613. Open Google Scholar
  7. Bader, Ralf M. Robert Nozick. Major conservative and libertarian thinkers v. 11. New York: Continuum, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  8. Batnitzky, Leora. “A Seamless Web? John Finnis and Joseph Raz on Practical Reason and the Obligation to Obey the Law.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15, no. 2 (1995): 153-175. Open Google Scholar
  9. Belliotti, Raymohnd A. Justifying Law: The Debate over Foundations, Goals, and Methods. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992. Open Google Scholar
  10. Bentham, Jeremy. “Anarchical Fallacies; being an examination of the Declaration of Rights issued during the French Revolution.” In Nonsense upon stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man. Edited by Jeremy Waldron, 46-76. London and New York: Methuen, 1987. Open Google Scholar
  11. Bentham, Jeremy. “Anarchical Fallacies; being an examination of the Declaration of Rights issued during the French Revolution.” In Nonsense upon stilts: Bentham An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. [first ed. 1781]. Kitchener: Batoche Books, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  12. Berlin, Isaiah. Four essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969. Open Google Scholar
  13. Bix, Brian. “On the dividing line between natural law theory and legal positivism.” Notre Dame Law Review 75, no. 5 (1999): 1613–1624. Open Google Scholar
  14. Bix, Brian. “On the dividing line between natural law theory and legal positivism.” Notre Dame Law Review 75 “Natural Law: The Modern Tradition.” In The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law. Edited by Jules L. Coleman, Scott Shapiro and Kenneth E. Himma, 64–66. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  15. Brems, Eva. “Human Rights: Minimum and Maximum Perspectives,” Human Rights Law Review 9(3) (2009): 349-372. Open Google Scholar
  16. Brownlee, Kimberley. “A Human Right against social deprivation.” The Philosophical Quarterly 63, no. 251 (2013): 199-222. Open Google Scholar
  17. Bryson, Phillip J. Socialism: Origins, Expansion, Decline, and the Attempted Revival in the United States. Bloomington, Indiana: Xlibris, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  18. Carens, Joseph H. “Rights and Duties in an Egalitarian Society.” Political Theory 14 (1986): 31-49. Open Google Scholar
  19. Christodoulidis, Emilios. “Social Rights and Markets.” Social & Legal Studies 24, no. 4 (2015): 595–597. Open Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, Jules L. “Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism.” Ratio Juris 22, no. 3 (2009): 359–394. Open Google Scholar
  21. Colm O´Cinneide. “The triumph of Human Rights: dream or nightmare?” UCL lectures, 2012. Online access: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/lhl/Spring2012/04_26012012 (last accessed: May 17, 2017). Open Google Scholar
  22. Conant, Lisa. “Individuals, Courts, and the Development of European Social Rights.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (2006): 76-100. Open Google Scholar
  23. Connell, Andrew. “Civil Rights and Social Welfare: Some Thoughts on the Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall.” The Political Quarterly 83, no. 3 (2012): 551–559. Open Google Scholar
  24. Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11 and 14, supplemented by Protocols Nos. 1, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 13, 4 November 1950. Open Google Scholar
  25. Council of Europe, European Social Charter (Revised), 3 May 1996, ETS 163. Open Google Scholar
  26. Council of Europe. “Manual on Human Rights and the Environment.” 2nd ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  27. Council of Europe. “Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  28. Cruft, Rowan. “Rights: Beyond Interest Theory and Will Theory?” Law and Philosophy 23, no. 4 (2004): 347–397. Open Google Scholar
  29. Curran, Eleanor. “Hobbes’s Theory of Rights – A Modern Interest Theory.” The Journal of Ethics 6, no. 1 (2002): 63–86. Open Google Scholar
  30. Daniels, Norman. “Democratic Equality: Rawls’s Complex Egalitarianism.” In The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Edited by Samuel Freeman, 241–276. Cambridge companions to philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Open Google Scholar
  31. Donnelly, Jack. “The Relative Universality of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2007): 281–306. Open Google Scholar
  32. Donnelly, Jack. “The Relative Universality of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 29 Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  33. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35, no. 14 (1967): 14-46. Open Google Scholar
  34. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35 Taking Rights Seriously. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1978. Open Google Scholar
  35. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35 “What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 10, no. 3 (1981): 185–246. Open Google Scholar
  36. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35 “Law as interpretation.” Texas Law Review 60 (1982): 527-550. Open Google Scholar
  37. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35 “Rights as trumps.” In Theories of Rights. Edited by Jeremy Waldron. 1rst ed. 153-167. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. Open Google Scholar
  38. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35 Law´s Empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap press of Harvard University Press, 1986. Open Google Scholar
  39. Dworkin, Ronald. “The Model of Rules.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35 Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap press of Harvard University Press, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  40. Eskridge Jr., William N. “The New Textualism.” UCLA Law Review 37, no. 621 (1990): 621-691. Open Google Scholar
  41. European Court of Human Rights, “Research Report on health-related issues in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.” Council of Europe, June 2015. Open Google Scholar
  42. European Union, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 26 October 2012, 2012/C 326/02. [Published in the Official Journal of the European Communities, 18 December 2000 (2000/C 364/01)]. Open Google Scholar
  43. Finnis, John. Natural Law and Natural Rights. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. Open Google Scholar
  44. Fredman, Sandra. Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. 1rst ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Open Google Scholar
  45. Freeman, Michael. “The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994): 491-514. Open Google Scholar
  46. Freeman, Michael. “The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 16 (1994) Human Rights: An interdisciplinary approach, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  47. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and method. translation revised by: Marshall, Donald G; Weinsheimer, Joel. Continuum impacts 2nd, rev. ed. London, New York: Continuum, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  48. George, Robert P., Lloyd L. Weinreb, and Russell Hittinger. “Recent Criticism of Natural Law Theory.” The University of Chicago Law Review 55, no. 4 (1988): 1371-1429. Open Google Scholar
  49. George, Robert P. “The Unorthodox Liberalism of Joseph Raz.” The Review of Politics 53, no. 4 (1991): 652–671. Open Google Scholar
  50. Gerards, Janneke. “The European Court of Human Rights.” In Comparative Constitutional Reasoning. Edited by András Jakab, 237–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Open Google Scholar
  51. Green, Michael Steven. “Legal realism as theory of law.” William & Mary Law Review 46, no. 6 (2004): 1915–2000. Open Google Scholar
  52. Green, Leslie. “Three Themes from Raz.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25, no. 3 (2005): 503–523. Open Google Scholar
  53. Green, Leslie, and Brian Leiter. Oxford studies in philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  54. Greer, Steven C. The exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights files 15. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1997. Open Google Scholar
  55. Greer, Steven C. The exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights files 15. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing “"Balancing" and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas-Alexy Debate.” Cambridge Law Journal 63, no. 2 (1999): 412–434. Open Google Scholar
  56. Greer, Steven C. The exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human rights files 15. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, problems and prospects. Cambridge studies in European law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Open Google Scholar
  57. Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace, including the Law of Nature and of Nations: translated from the Original Latin of Grotius, with Notes and Illustrations from Political and Legal Writers, by A.C. Campbell, A.M. with an Introduction by David J. Hill. New York: M. Walter Dunne, 1901 ed. [1625]. Available online: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/grotius-the-rights-of-war-and-peace-1901-ed (last update 12-10-2015). Open Google Scholar
  58. Hare, Richard M. Freedom and reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963. Open Google Scholar
  59. Harris, David John, Michael O'Boyle, Colin Warbrick, Ed Bates, and Carla Buckley. Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. With the assistance of Paul Harvey. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  60. Hart, Herbert L. A. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” The Philosophical Review 64, no. 2 (1955): 175–91. Open Google Scholar
  61. Hart, Herbert L. A. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” The Philosophical Review 64 The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. Open Google Scholar
  62. Hittinger, Russell. A critique of the new natural law theory. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987. Open Google Scholar
  63. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. (ed. A. P. Martinich and Brian Battiste). Toronto: Broadview Editions, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  64. Holmes, Oliver Wendell. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review 457, no. 10 (1897). Open Google Scholar
  65. Horty, John F. “Rules and reasons in the theory of precedent.” Legal Theory 17 (2011): 1-33. Open Google Scholar
  66. Kao, Grace Y. Grounding Human Rights in a Pluralist World. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  67. Kar, Robin B. “Hart's Response to Exclusive Legal Positivism.” Georgetown law Journal 95 (2006): 393–461. Open Google Scholar
  68. Kelsen, Hans. Pure theory of law. Translation from the second German edition: Max Knight. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967. Open Google Scholar
  69. Kenny, Jo. “European Convention on Human Rights and Social Welfare.” European Human Rights Law Review, no. 5 (2010): 495–503. Open Google Scholar
  70. Kilkelly, Ursula. “The right to respect for private and family life: A guide to the implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” Human rights handbooks 1, 2003. http://www.echr.coe.int/LibraryDocs/HR%20handbooks/handbook01_en.pdf. Open Google Scholar
  71. Klatt, Matthias. “Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.” Heidelberg Journal of International Law (HJIL) 71 (2011): 691–718. Open Google Scholar
  72. Koch, Ida Elisabeth. “Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Components in Civil and Political Rights: A Hermeneutic Perspective.” The International Journal of Human Rights 10 (2006): 405-430. Open Google Scholar
  73. Korsgaard, Christine M., G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams. The Sources of Normativity. 14th Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  74. Kramer, Matthew H. “Refining the Interest Theory of Rights.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 55, no. 1 (2010): 31–39. Open Google Scholar
  75. Kramer, Matthew H. “Refining the Interest Theory of Rights.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 55 “Some Doubts about Alternatives to the Interest Theory of Rights.” Ethics 123, no. 2 (2013): 245–63. Open Google Scholar
  76. Kronman, Anthony T. “Talent Pooling.” Nomos 23 (1981): 58–79. Open Google Scholar
  77. Kumm, Mattias. “Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement.” In Law, rights and discourse: The legal philosophy of Robert Alexy. Edited by George Pavlakos, 131–66. Legal Theory Today, No. 11. Oxford, Portland, Or.: Hart Publishing, 2007. Open Google Scholar
  78. Kymlicka, Will. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality.” Ethics 99, no. 4 (1989): 883–905. Open Google Scholar
  79. Kymlicka, Will. “Liberal Individualism and Liberal Neutrality.” Ethics 99 Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  80. La Torre, Massimo. “On Two Distinct and Opposing Versions of Natural Law: "Exclusive" versus "Inclusive".” Ratio Juris 19, no. 2 (2006): 197–216. Open Google Scholar
  81. Lambert, Hélène. The position of aliens in relation to the European Convention on Human Rights. 3rd ed. Migration Collection. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2006. Open Google Scholar
  82. Lamond, Grant. “Do precedents create rules?.” Legal Theory 11 (2005): 1-26. Open Google Scholar
  83. Langlois, Anthony J. “Human Rights and Modern Liberalism: A Critique.” Political Studies 51, no. 3 (2016): 509–523. Open Google Scholar
  84. Lavrysen, Laurens. “The scope of rights and the scope of obligations: Positive obligations.” In Shaping rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human rights in Determining the scope of Human Rights. Edited by Eva Brems and Janneke Gerrards. 162-182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  85. Lavrysen, Laurens. “The scope of rights and the scope of obligations: Positive obligations.” In Shaping rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human rights in Determining the scope of Human Rights. Edited by Eva Brems and Janneke Gerrards. 162-182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Human Rights in a positive state: Rethinking the relationship between positive and negative obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Doctoral thesis. University of Ghent, 2016. Open Google Scholar
  86. Leijten, Ingrit. “Defining the scope of economic and social guarantees in the case law of the ECtHR.” In Shaping rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human rights in Determining the scope of Human Rights. Edited by Eva Brems and Janneke Gerrards. 109–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  87. Leiter, Brian. “Positivism, Formalism, Realism: Reviewed Work: Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence by Anthony Sebok.” Columbia Law Review 99, no. 4 (1999): 1138–1164. Open Google Scholar
  88. Leiter, Brian. “Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue?” Legal Theory 16, no. 02 (2010): 111–133. Open Google Scholar
  89. Letsas, George. “The Truth in Autonomous Concepts: How To Interpret the ECHR.” European Journal of International Law 15, no. 2 (2004): 279–305. Open Google Scholar
  90. Letsas, George. A theory of interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Open Google Scholar
  91. Letsas, George. “Strasbourg's Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer.” European Journal of International Law 21, no. 3 (2010): 509–541. Open Google Scholar
  92. Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. (ed. C. B. Macpherson). Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company, 1980. Open Google Scholar
  93. Lomasky, Loren E. “But is it liberalism?” Critical Review 4, 1-2 (1990): 86–105. Open Google Scholar
  94. Loughlin, Martin. Sword and scales: An examination of the relationship between law and politics. Oxford, Portland, Or.: Hart Publishing, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  95. Luling Haughton, Rosemary. “Transcendence and Being Modern.” In A Catholic modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award lecture, with responses by William M. Shea, Rosemary Luling Haughton, George Marsden, Jean Bethke Elshtain. Edited by Charles Taylor, and James Heft. 65-81. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  96. MacIntyre, Alasdair C. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 3rd ed. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007. Open Google Scholar
  97. Mackie, John L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin, 1977. Open Google Scholar
  98. Macklem, Patrick. The Sovereignty of Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015. Open Google Scholar
  99. Magnussen, Anne-Mette, and Even Nilssen. “Juridification and the Construction of Social Citizenship.” Journal of Law and Society 40, no. 2 (2013): 228–248. Open Google Scholar
  100. Mantouvalou, Virginia. “N v UK: No Duty to Rescue the Nearby Needy?” The Modern Law Review Limited 72 (2009): 815-843. Open Google Scholar
  101. Mantouvalou, Virginia. “N v UK: No Duty to Rescue the Nearby Needy?” The Modern Law Review Limited 72 (2009) “Labour Rights in the European Convention on Human Rights: An Intellectual Justification for an Integrated Approach to Interpretation.” Human Rights Law Review 13:3 (2013): 529-555. Open Google Scholar
  102. McCabe, David. “Joseph Raz and the Contextual Argument for Liberal Perfectionism.” Ethics 111, no. 3 (2001): 493–522. Open Google Scholar
  103. Mccrudden, Christopher. “Legal Research and the Social Sciences.” Law Quarterly Review 122 (2006): 632-650. Open Google Scholar
  104. Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  105. Moore, Margaret. “Liberalism and the Ideal of the Good Life.” The Review of Politics 53, no. 4 (1991): 672–690. Open Google Scholar
  106. Morawetz, Thomas. “The Authority of Law. Joseph Raz.” Ethics 91, no. 3 (1981): 516–519. Open Google Scholar
  107. Moskop, J. C. “Rawlsian justice and a human right to health care.” The Journal of medicine and philosophy 8, no. 4 (1983): 329–338. Open Google Scholar
  108. Mowbray, Alistair R. The development of positive obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. Human rights law in perspective v. 2. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004. Open Google Scholar
  109. Nathan, Andrew J. “Universalism: A Particularistic Account.” In Negotiating culture and human rights. Edited by Lynda S. Bell, Andrew J. Nathan and Ilan Peleg, 349–68. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  110. Nickel, James W. “Poverty and Rights.” Philosophical Quarterly 55, no. 220 (2005): 385–402. Open Google Scholar
  111. Norman, Wayne J. “The Autonomy-Based Liberalism of Joseph Raz.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2, no. 2 (1989): 151–162. Open Google Scholar
  112. Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  113. Nussbaum, Martha, and Sen, Amartya. The Quality of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1993. The online version available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198287976.001.0001/acprof-9780198287971. Open Google Scholar
  114. Olson, Mancur. The Logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. 2nd edition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971. Open Google Scholar
  115. Osiatyński, Wiktor. Human rights and their limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Open Google Scholar
  116. Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. Open Google Scholar
  117. Paul, Ellen Frankel, Fred D. Miller, and Jeffrey Paul, eds. Natural rights liberalism from Locke to Nozick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  118. Pavlakos, George. “Non-Individualism, Rights, and Practical Reason.” Ratio Juris 21, no. 1 (2008): 66–93. Open Google Scholar
  119. Pavlakos, George, Niko Kolodny, Ulrike Heuer, and Douglas Lavin. “Three comments on Joseph Raz’s Conception on Normativity.” Jurisprudence 2, no. 2 (2011): 329-378. Open Google Scholar
  120. Pettit, Philip. A theory of freedom: From the psychology to the politics of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  121. Πολίτης, Γιώργος Ν. (2010). Ελευθερία και Εξουσία: Καταστατικές αρχές κοινωνικής φιλοσοφίας. Αθήνα: Γιώργος Ν. Πολίτης. Open Google Scholar
  122. Posner, Richard A. “Legal formalism, legal realism, and the interpretation of statutes and the constitution.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 37, no. 2 (1986): 179–217. Open Google Scholar
  123. Pound, Roscoe. “Mechanical Jurisprudence.” Columbia Law Review 8, no. 8 (1908): 605. Open Google Scholar
  124. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  125. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge The Law of Peoples. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000. Open Google Scholar
  126. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81, no. 5 (1972): 823-854. Open Google Scholar
  127. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979. Open Google Scholar
  128. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Professor Dworkin´s theory of rights.” Review of Taking Rights Seriously, by Ronald Dworkin. Political Studies XXVI, no. 1 (1983): 123-137. Open Google Scholar
  129. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “On the Nature of Rights.” Mind 93, no. 370 (1984): 194-214. Open Google Scholar
  130. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 The Morality of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. Open Google Scholar
  131. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Liberating duties.” Law and Philosophy 8, no. 1 (1989): 3-21. Open Google Scholar
  132. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Morality as Interpretation.” Review of Interpretation and Social Criticism, by Michael Walzer. Ethics 101, no. 2 (1991): 392-405. Open Google Scholar
  133. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Rights and Individual Well-being.” Ratio Juris 5, no. 2 (1992): 127-142. Open Google Scholar
  134. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “On the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning.” Ratio Juris 6, no. 1 (1993): 1-15. Open Google Scholar
  135. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 26 March 1993, in the second out of four lectures titled ´The Practice of Value´ at Princeton University. Open Google Scholar
  136. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Rights and Politics.” Indiana Law Journal 71, no. 27 (1995): 27-44. Open Google Scholar
  137. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 Ethics in the public domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. Open Google Scholar
  138. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 Practical Reason and Norms. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  139. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “The Myth of Instrumental Rationality.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1, no. 1 (2005): 2-28. Open Google Scholar
  140. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Human Rights Without Foundations.” Legal Studies Research Paper Series, no. 14/2007, University of Oxford Faculty of Law, 2007. Open Google Scholar
  141. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Being in the world.” Ratio 23, no. 4 (2010): 433-452. Open Google Scholar
  142. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Human Rights in the Emerging World Order.” Transnational Legal Theory 1, no. 1 (2010): 31-47. Open Google Scholar
  143. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 “Is there a reason to keep a promise?” Legal Studies Research Paper Series, no. 2014-5, King’s College London Dickson Poon School of Law, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  144. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 Email correspondence with author. February 9, 2017. Open Google Scholar
  145. Raz, Joseph. “Legal Principles and the Limits of Law.” The Yale Law Journal 81 Email correspondence with author. February 14, 2017. Open Google Scholar
  146. Reidy, Aisling. “The prohibition of torture: A guide to the implementation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.” Human rights handbooks, no. 6, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  147. Ruger, Jennifer Prah. “Toward a Theory of a Right to Health: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements.” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 18 (2006): 273-326. Open Google Scholar
  148. Sandel, Michael J., ed. Liberalism and its critics. Readings in social and political theory. New York: New York University Press, 1984. Open Google Scholar
  149. Sandel, Michael J. Liberalism and the limits of justice. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  150. Sathanapally, Aruna. “Justifying procedural rights review.” paper presentation at the Expert seminar on procedural review and the European Court of Human Rights, Ghent, 21-22 May 2015. Open Google Scholar
  151. Scanlon, Thomas M. “Rights and Interests.” In Arguments for a better world: Essays in honor of Amartya Sen. Edited by Kaushik Basu and Amartya Sen, 68–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Open Google Scholar
  152. Sebok, Anthony James. Legal positivism in American jurisprudence. Cambridge studies in philosophy and law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar
  153. Sen, Amartya. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992. Open Google Scholar
  154. Sen, Amartya. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  155. Shapiro, Danny. “Does Ronald Dworkin Take Rights Seriously?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12, no. 3 (2013): 417–434. Open Google Scholar
  156. Shea, William M. “A Vote of Thanks to Voltaire.” In A Catholic modernity? Charles Taylor's Marianist Award lecture, with responses by William M. Shea, Rosemary Luling Haughton, George Marsden, Jean Bethke Elshtain. Edited by Charles Taylor and James Heft, 39–64. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  157. Shelton, Dina (ed.). The Oxford handbook of International Human Rights Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  158. Shue, Henry. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1980. Open Google Scholar
  159. Simmonds, Nigel E. Central issues in jurisprudence: Justice, law and rights. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008. Open Google Scholar
  160. Simpson, A. W. Brian. “The Ratio Decidendi of a Case and the Doctrine of Binding Precedent.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 1st series. Edited by A. G. Guest, 148–175. London: Oxford University Press, 1961. Open Google Scholar
  161. Skinner, Quentin. “The idea of negative liberty: Philosophical and historical perspectives.” In Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy. Edited by Richard Rorty, Jerome Schneewind, and Quentin Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Open Google Scholar
  162. Smet, Stijn. “The ‘absolute’ prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment in Article 3 ECHR.” In Shaping rights in the ECHR: The role of the European Court of Human Rights in determining the scope of human rights. Edited by Eva Brems and Janneke H. Gerards, 273–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Open Google Scholar
  163. Stone Sweet, Alec. “On the Constitutionalisation of the Convention: The European Court of Human Rights as a Constitutional Court.” Faculty Scholarship Series 1-1, Yale Law School, 2009. Open Google Scholar
  164. Sumner, Leonard W. The moral foundation of rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Open Google Scholar
  165. Tamanaha, Brian Z. Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2009. Open Google Scholar
  166. Tasioulas, John. “Human Rights, Legitimacy, and International Law.” The American Journal of Jurisprudence 58, no. 1 (2013): 1-25. Open Google Scholar
  167. Taylor, Charles. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985. Open Google Scholar
  168. Taylor, Charles. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. New York: Cambridge University Press “A Catholic Modernity?” In A Catholic Modernity? Charles Taylor´s Marianist Award Lecture, with responses by William M. Shea, Rosemary Luling Haughton, George Marsden, Jean Bethke Elshtain. Edited by Charles Taylor, and James Heft, 13-37. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. Open Google Scholar
  169. Taylor, Charles. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. New York: Cambridge University Press Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. 10th ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2001. Open Google Scholar
  170. Taylor, Charles. Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1. New York: Cambridge University Press “Gadamer on the Human Sciences.” In The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Edited by Robert J. Dostal. 126-142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  171. Van der Schyff, Gerhard. Limitation of Rights: As study of the European Convention and the South African Bill of Rights. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2005. Open Google Scholar
  172. van Duffel, Siegfried. “Moral Philosophy.” In The Oxford handbook of International Human Rights Law. Edited by Dinah Shelton. 32–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Open Google Scholar
  173. Van Hoecke, Mark, ed. Methodologies of Legal Research: Which kind of method for what kind of disciple? Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2011. Open Google Scholar
  174. Veitch, Scott, Emilios A. Christodoulidis, and Lindsay Farmer. Jurisprudence: Themes and concepts. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2012. Open Google Scholar
  175. Waldron, Jeremy. Nonsense upon stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man. London and New York: Methuen, 1987. Open Google Scholar
  176. Waldron, Jeremy. Nonsense upon stilts: Bentham “A Right-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 13, no. 1 (1993): 18-51. Open Google Scholar
  177. Walzer, Michael. “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” Political Theory 18, no. 1 (1990): 6-23. Open Google Scholar
  178. Weinreb, Lloyd. Natural Law and Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987. Open Google Scholar
  179. Wellman, Carl. The moral dimensions of human rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  180. Williams, Bernard. “A critique of utilitarianism.” In Utilitarianism For and Against. Edited by J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams. 77-150. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "European Law & International Law & Comparative Law"
Cover of book: Der Volkseinwand
Book Titles No access
Florian Feigl
Der Volkseinwand
Cover of book: Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Book Titles No access
Dennis Traudt
Wie fördert die EU Menschenrechte in Drittstaaten?
Cover of book: Future-Proofing in Public Law
Edited Book No access
Nicole Koblenz LL.M., Nicholas Otto, Gernot Sydow
Future-Proofing in Public Law
Cover of book: Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Book Titles No access
Justus Schmidt
Das Weltraumrecht und seine Eignung für den Rohstoffabbau durch Privatakteure
Cover of book: From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law
Book Titles No access
Isabella Poewe
From Outlaws to Equal Players – Rebel Courts in International Law

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex