
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access
International Arbitration 10x10
100 Facts an in-house counsel needs to know- Authors:
- | | |
- Series:
- Beck International
- Publisher:
- 2023
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2023
- ISBN-Print
- 978-3-406-77971-8
- ISBN-Online
- 978-3-406-80534-9
- Publisher
- C.H.BECK Recht - Wirtschaft - Steuern, München
- Series
- Beck International
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 232
- Product type
- Book Titles
Table of contents
ChapterPages
- Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access Pages I - 6
- 1. Talking about arbitration requires knowledge of some terms No access Pages 8 - 12
- 2. Cooperative negotiating is not “friendlier” than competitive negotiating No access Pages 12 - 14
- 3. Mediation is a well-established method for solving economic disputes No access Pages 14 - 16
- 4. Dispute adjudication boards are a viable option for major projects No access Pages 16 - 18
- 5. Adjudication is usually linked to international arbitration No access Pages 18 - 20
- 6. International arbitration is neither amicable nor non-binding No access Pages 20 - 22
- 7. Arbitration does not take place in a legal vacuum No access Pages 22 - 24
- 8. Mediation and international arbitration can be intertwined No access Pages 24 - 26
- 9. Money laundering, bribery and corruption cases pose ethical challenges in arbitration No access Pages 26 - 28
- 10. International arbitration offers significant advantages No access Pages 28 - 31
- 1. No arbitration without consent to arbitrate No access Pages 32 - 34
- 2. Objective arbitrability – not every kind of dispute can be submitted to arbitration No access Pages 34 - 36
- 3. In dubio pro arbitrare? – Consent is a grey area No access Pages 36 - 38
- 4. Don’t reinvent the wheel (or don’t draft, just copy) No access Pages 38 - 40
- 5. Institutional arbitration is preferable to ad hoc arbitration No access Pages 40 - 42
- 6. Choosing a good arbitration institution is important No access Pages 42 - 44
- 7. Multi-tier clauses – arbitration might only be the last resort No access Pages 44 - 46
- 8. Complex transactions require complex precautions – multi-contract and multi-party situations No access Pages 46 - 48
- 9. Terminating a contract leaves the arbitration clause unaffected No access Pages 48 - 50
- 10. Arbitration agreements in standard terms may be void or subject to specific legal requirements for validity No access Pages 50 - 53
- 1. Disputes may be referred to sole arbitrators or to tribunals No access Pages 54 - 56
- 2. The end does not justify the means (or the importance of following the appointment procedure) No access Pages 56 - 58
- 3. An appointing authority can be important for the performance of the arbitration agreement No access Pages 58 - 60
- 4. Your best friend might not be your best arbitrator No access Pages 60 - 62
- 5. Justice must not only be done, but be seen to be done No access Pages 62 - 64
- 6. Challenge an arbitrator only if absolutely necessary No access Pages 64 - 66
- 7. Appointment of arbitrators in multi-party disputes is difficult at best No access Pages 66 - 68
- 8. “Because I say so!” – Arbitrators have great discretion in running the proceedings No access Pages 68 - 70
- 9. The liability of arbitrators is usually limited No access Pages 70 - 72
- 10. Emergency arbitrator: sometimes a ruling is required before the arbitration starts No access Pages 72 - 75
- 1. There are seven common steps in arbitral proceedings No access Pages 76 - 78
- 2. The terms of reference provide a guiding hand No access Pages 78 - 80
- 3. Bifurcating proceedings can save costs for the parties No access Pages 80 - 82
- 4. Written submissions have to comply with formal and material requirements No access Pages 82 - 84
- 5. Objections to the jurisdiction have to be raised quickly No access Pages 84 - 86
- 6. Set-off defenses are admissible in arbitral proceedings if the underlying claim is covered by the arbitration agreement No access Pages 86 - 88
- 7. Culture has an impact – the “Americanization” of proceedings No access Pages 88 - 90
- 8. The seat of arbitration is paramount to the success of the proceedings, but hearings can be held elsewhere No access Pages 90 - 92
- 9. Opening statements can make a difference No access Pages 92 - 94
- 10. Confidentiality should not be assumed No access Pages 94 - 97
- 1. Parties and tribunals often rely on the IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration No access Pages 98 - 100
- 2. Document production can be a blessing and a curse No access Pages 100 - 102
- 3. Document production in practice – the Redfern Schedule No access Pages 102 - 104
- 4. Direct testimony is often replaced by witness statements No access Pages 104 - 106
- 5. Cross-examination is the standard No access Pages 106 - 108
- 6. Re-examination is not always advisable No access Pages 108 - 110
- 7. Familiarizing and preparing the witness: there are ethical and legal limitations No access Pages 110 - 112
- 8. Golden rules for the witness during cross-examination No access Pages 112 - 114
- 9. There are different ways of producing expert witness evidence No access Pages 114 - 116
- 10. Witness conferencing – expert witnesses might find themselves in the hot tub No access Pages 116 - 119
- 1. The three secrets of success: organization, organization, organization No access Pages 120 - 122
- 2. Arbitration is a marathon, not a sprint competition No access Pages 122 - 124
- 3. Choosing the right counsel – experience in arbitration makes the difference No access Pages 124 - 126
- 4. Guerilla tactics in inter national arbitration: not all is fair in love and war No access Pages 126 - 128
- 5. Presentation is key: how structuring submissions and evidence can influence the tribunal No access Pages 128 - 130
- 6. The psychology of persuasion – a winning strategy should consider how the human brain works No access Pages 130 - 132
- 7. The 30/70 rule makes complete winning difficult No access Pages 132 - 134
- 8. Culture affects arbitral proceedings No access Pages 134 - 136
- 9. There exist rules to be observed when arbitrators are trying to facilitate settlement No access Pages 136 - 138
- 10. Calderbank offers can encourage settlement No access Pages 138 - 141
- 1. Arbitral tribunals have jurisdiction to decide on interim measures during the proceedings No access Pages 142 - 144
- 2. Enforceability of interim measures ordered by an arbitral tribunal depends on domestic procedural law No access Pages 144 - 146
- 3. Arbitration does not bar recourse to courts for interim measures No access Pages 146 - 148
- 4. Anti-arbitration injunctions are rare – but some jurisdictions still allow them No access Pages 148 - 150
- 5. Anti-suit injunctions are increasingly recognized in several jurisdictions No access Pages 150 - 152
- 6. Some jurisdictions allow for court review of the validity of the arbitration agreement prior to commencement of proceedings No access Pages 152 - 154
- 7. State courts have an important say in challenge proceedings No access Pages 154 - 156
- 8. State courts may be relied on to assist with the production of evidence for arbitral proceedings No access Pages 156 - 158
- 9. State courts may determine non-arbitrable preliminary claims No access Pages 158 - 160
- 10. The tribunal may issue interim awards, partial awards and a final award No access Pages 160 - 163
- 1. Finality of the award is more definite than a domestic court judgement No access Pages 164 - 166
- 2. Grounds for challenging an award are usually very limited No access Pages 166 - 168
- 3. Invalidity of the arbitration agreement is a reason for challenging an award No access Pages 168 - 170
- 4. Violation of the right to be heard is a reason for challenging an award No access Pages 170 - 172
- 5. Excess of jurisdiction or non-compliance with the procedure are reasons for challenging an award No access Pages 172 - 174
- 6. Vacated award is a reason for non-enforceability No access Pages 174 - 176
- 7. Violation of public policy is a reason for challenging an award No access Pages 176 - 178
- 8. “Manifest disregard of the law” is usually no reason for challenging an award No access Pages 178 - 180
- 9. Enforcement proceedings require careful preparation No access Pages 180 - 182
- 10. The procedures for challenging and enforcing an award depend on domestic law No access Pages 182 - 185
- 1. Arbitration is expensive No access Pages 186 - 188
- 2. The means to force the other party to pay the advance on costs are limited No access Pages 188 - 190
- 3. Cost allocation usually follows the final award No access Pages 190 - 192
- 4. All costs are (usually) recoverable No access Pages 192 - 194
- 5. In-house counsel costs may be recoverable No access Pages 194 - 196
- 6. Security for costs is difficult to obtain No access Pages 196 - 198
- 7. Third-party funding is available in international arbitration No access Pages 198 - 200
- 8. Punitive damages are generally not awarded in international arbitration No access Pages 200 - 202
- 9. In many jurisdictions the award may not establish penalties in case of non-performance No access Pages 202 - 204
- 10. Defaulting on the obligation to arbitrate can be sanctioned No access Pages 204 - 207
- 1. Rescuing sunk investments – BITs can open the door to arbitration against a state No access Pages 208 - 210
- 2. (Estranged) siblings: there are differences and similarities between international commercial arbitration and investment arbitration No access Pages 210 - 212
- 3. The consent to arbitrate treaty claims – the first part is already there No access Pages 212 - 214
- 4. Many investors enjoy protection under BITs … and the opportunity for treaty shopping No access Pages 214 - 216
- 5. Numerous kinds of investments are protected No access Pages 216 - 218
- 6. The investor may choose the forum, but must be aware of the fork in the road No access Pages 218 - 220
- 7. Recognition and enforcement of ICSID awards is relatively easy No access Pages 220 - 222
- 8. No expropriation without compensation! No access Pages 222 - 224
- 9. The state has to accord fair and equitable treatment to the investment No access Pages 224 - 226
- 10. Contractual rights can be protected under the “umbrella” of investment treaties No access Pages 226 - 229
- Editors & Authors No access Pages 229 - 232




