Cover of book: Roman Historiography
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Educational Book No access

Roman Historiography

Authors:
Publisher:
 25.03.2025

Summary

For both Classics and Ancient History, ancient historiography offers the most direct access to the world and history of Rome. Caesar, Tacitus and Cassius Dio have served as sources for the image of Rome and the Roman Empire for almost two millennia. This introduction examines the persuasive power of these historical narratives and describes the forms and development of historical documentation and representation. Vivid images and memorable examples are used to illuminate the techniques and strategies of the texts, as well as the cultural and historical preconditions of their authors. Jörg Rüpke examines the historical sources as well as the literary approaches to these texts.

Keywords

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2025
Publication date
25.03.2025
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-1542-9
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-4347-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
NomosTextbook
Language
English
Pages
223
Product type
Educational Book

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 8
    1. 1.1 History and historiography No access
    2. 1.2 Remembrance, history and memory No access
    3. 1.3 Historical narrative No access
    4. 1.4 Characteristics of the narrative No access
    5. 1.5 Historiography and its alternatives No access
    6. 1.6 Fact and fiction No access
    7. 1.7 The aim of the book No access
    1. 2.1 Narrative problems of historiography No access
    2. 2.2 Typology No access
      1. 2.3.1 André Jolles No access
      2. 2.3.2 Biblical exegesis No access
      3. 2.3.3 Film analysis No access
    4. 2.4 Important forms in historiography No access
    5. 2.5 Summary No access
    1. 3.1 The history of writing in Rome No access
    2. 3.2 Public archives – the written form of administration No access
    3. 3.3 Published texts No access
    4. 3.4 Family tradition No access
    5. 3.5 Priestly archives No access
    1. 4.1 On the road to Roman historiography No access
    2. 4.2 Development of literary forms No access
    3. 4.3 Chronology No access
    4. 4.4 Rome in Greek historiography No access
      1. 4.5.1 Early phase and older annals No access
      2. 4.5.2 Civil war period No access
      3. 4.5.3 Early imperial period No access
      4. 4.5.4 The later principate No access
      5. 4.5.5 Dominate No access
      6. 4.5.6 Late and subantique world and provincial histories No access
    1. 5.1 The politician No access
    2. 5.2 Caesar’s religion No access
    3. 5.3 Biographical overview No access
    4. 5.4 C. Iulii Caesaris commentarii rerum gestarum belli Gallici No access
    5. 5.5 Bellum Pompeianum: The so-called ‘civil war’ No access
    6. 5.6 The Corpus Caesarianum No access
    7. 5.7 Party literature No access
    8. 5.8 The further reception history of the Corpus Caesarianum No access
    1. 6.1 Introduction No access
    2. 6.2 Life No access
    3. 6.3 Plan No access
    4. 6.4 Sources and effect No access
    5. 6.5 Performance No access
      1. 6.6.1 Annalist No access
      2. 6.6.2 Mythograph No access
      3. 6.6.3 Historian No access
      4. 6.6.4 Psychologist No access
      5. 6.6.5 An Augustan writer No access
      1. 7.1.1 Bellum Catilinae No access
      2. 7.1.2 Bellum Iugurthinum No access
      3. 7.1.3 Historiae No access
      4. 7.1.4 Sallustius’ historiographical place No access
    2. 7.2 Biography No access
    3. 7.3 Choice of subject No access
    4. 7.4 Style No access
    5. 7.5 Effect No access
    1. 8.1 Exempla and history No access
    2. 8.2 Religious and historiographical authority beyond myths No access
    1. 9.1 Senatorial historiography No access
    2. 9.2 Tacitus' biography No access
    3. 9.3 Motives No access
      1. 9.4.1 Agricola No access
      2. 9.4.2 Germania No access
      3. 9.4.3 Dialogue No access
      4. 9.4.4 Historiae No access
      5. 9.4.5 Annales No access
    5. 9.5 Tacitean historiography No access
    6. 9.6 Effect No access
      1. 9.7.1 Biography No access
      2. 9.7.2 Composition No access
      3. 9.7.3 Alignment No access
    1. 10.1 Dionysius of Halicarnassus No access
    2. 10.2 Appian No access
    3. 10.3 Cassius Dio No access
    4. 10.4 Herodian No access
    1. 11.1 Back to narratology No access
    2. 11.2 Concepts of biography No access
    3. 11.3 Aspects of the history of form No access
    4. 11.4 Roman biographers No access
    5. 11.5 Biography as specialised literature No access
    6. 11.6 Biographies as parenetic literature No access
    7. 11.7 Suetonius’ career No access
    8. 11.8 Suetonius’ œuvre No access
    9. 11.9 Suetonius as a historian No access
    10. 11.10 The Historia Augusta No access
    1. 12.1 Spectrum No access
      1. 12.2.1 The two earliest specimens No access
      2. 12.2.2 Fasti Ostienses No access
      3. 12.2.3 Fasti in the structure of historiographical genres No access
      4. 12.2.4 From Augustan inscriptions to the late antique book market: The Chronograph of 354 No access
    1. 13.1 The meaning of history No access
    2. 13.2 Universal history: Pompeius Trogus No access
    3. 13.3 Christian universal history No access
    4. 13.4 Church history No access
  15. 14 The Bible and medieval historiography No access 197 - 200
    1. Fragmentss No access
    2. 1 Introduction: Historical narrative No access
    3. 2 History of form and genre No access
    4. 3 Sources and preliminary forms No access
    5. 4 A timeline of Roman historiography No access
    6. 5 Caesar's commentarii No access
    7. 6 Annalists and Livy No access
    8. 7 Historical monographs: Sallustius No access
    9. 8 Exempla: Valerius Maximus No access
    10. 9a Senatorial historiography of the imperial period: Tacitus No access
    11. 9b Senatorial historiography of the imperial period: Ammianus Marcellinus No access
    12. 10 Roman history through Greek eyes No access
    13. 11 Biographies: Suetonius and the Historia Augusta No access
    14. 12 Historiographical short forms No access
    15. 13 Universal and church history No access
    16. 14 The Bible and medieval historiography No access
  17. Acknowledgement No access 213 - 214
  18. Index No access 215 - 223

Bibliography (287)

  1. Jacoby, Felix (Ed.). Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker. Berlin, Oxford 1923. Open Google Scholar
  2. Peter, Hermann (Ed.). Historicorum Romanorum reliquiae 1–2. Stuttgart 1967. Open Google Scholar
  3. Beck, Hans; Walter, Uwe (Eds.). Die frühen römischen Historiker. 2 vols. Darmstadt 2001–2004. Open Google Scholar
  4. Adam, Klaus-Peter (Ed.). Historiographie in der Antike. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft 373. Berlin 2008. Open Google Scholar
  5. Ankersmit, Frank R. Historical representation. Stanford 2001. Open Google Scholar
  6. Id. Sublime historical experience. Stanford 2005. Open Google Scholar
  7. Baines, John et al. (Eds.). Historical consciousness and the use of the past in the ancient world. Sheffield 2019. Open Google Scholar
  8. Becker, Eve-Marie; Rüpke, Jörg (Eds.). Autoren in religiösen literarischen Texten der späthellenistischen und der frühkaiserzeitlichen Welt: Zwölf Fallstudien. Culture, Religion, and Politics in the Greco-Roman World 3. Tübingen 2019. Open Google Scholar
  9. Benoist, Stéphane et al (Eds.). Mémoires partagées, mémoires disputées: écriture et réécriture de l'histoire. Metz 2009. Open Google Scholar
  10. Berek, Mathias. Kollektives Gedächtnis und die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit: Eine Theorie der Erinnerungskulturen. Kultur- und sozialwissenschaftliche Studien 2. Wiesbaden 2009. Open Google Scholar
  11. Cameron, Averil (Ed.). History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. London 1989. Open Google Scholar
  12. Certeau, Michel de. Das Schreiben der Geschichte. Historische Studien 4. Frankfurt am Main 1991. Open Google Scholar
  13. Conermann, Stephan (Ed.). Modi des Erzählens in nicht-abendländischen Texten. Narratio Aliena?: Studien des Bonner Zentrums für Transkulturelle Narratologie (BZTN) 2. Berlin 2009. Open Google Scholar
  14. Connerton, Paul. How societies remember. Cambridge 1989. Open Google Scholar
  15. Cubitt, Geoffrey. History and Memory. Manchester 2007. Open Google Scholar
  16. Feldherr, Andrew (Ed.). History of Historiography. Oxford 2011. Open Google Scholar
  17. Fuhrer, Therese. „Bio-Historiographie: zur Funktion biographischer Modellierungen in römischer Geschichtsschreibung und Hagiographie.“ In: Birkner, Christoph; Gemeinhardt, Peter; Munkholt Christensen, Maria (Eds.), Narratologie und Intertextualität: Zugänge zu spätantiken Text-Welten. Tübingen 2020. Pp. 23–41. Open Google Scholar
  18. Goertz, Hans-Jürgen. Geschichte: ein Grundkurs. 2nd ed. Reinbek 2001. Open Google Scholar
  19. Grafton, Anthony. What was history? The art of history in early modern Europe. Cambridge 2007. Open Google Scholar
  20. Grethlein, Jonas. Experience and teleology in ancient historiography: ‚Futures past' from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge 2013. Open Google Scholar
  21. Halbwachs, Maurice. Les Cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris 1925. Open Google Scholar
  22. Hartmann, Andreas. Zwischen Relikt und Reliquie: Objektbezogene Erinnerungspraktiken in antiken Gesellschaften. Studien zur Alten Geschichte 11. Berlin 2010. Open Google Scholar
  23. Holzberg, Niklas. „Geschichte als erzählte Geschichte: Dramatische Episoden in der römischen Historiographie.“ Potsdamer Lateintage 7 (2015). Pp. 11–25. Open Google Scholar
  24. Koschorke, Albrecht. Wahrheit und Erfindung: Grundzüge einer Allgemeinen Erzähltheorie. Frankfurt am Main 2012. Open Google Scholar
  25. Koselleck, Reinhart; Lutz, Heinrich; Rüsen, Jörn (Eds.). Formen der Geschichtsschreibung. Theorie der Geschichte 4. München 1982. Open Google Scholar
  26. LeGoff, Jacques. History and Memory. New York 1992. Open Google Scholar
  27. Lorenz, Chris. „Comparative Historiography: Problems and Perspectives.“ History and Theory 38,1 (1999). Pp. 25–39. Open Google Scholar
  28. Luraghi, Nino. „Historiography and community: Some thoughts on the Greco-Roman heritage.“ In: Pohl, Walter; Wieser, Veronika (Eds.), Historiography and identity. 1, Ancient and early Christian narratives of community. Turnhout 2019. Pp. 51–63. Open Google Scholar
  29. Malitz, Jürgen. „Das Interesse an der Geschichte: Die griechischen Historiker und ihr Publikum.” In: Verdin, H.; Schepens, G.; Keyser, E. de (Eds.), Purposes of History: Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B. C. Studia Hellenistica 30. Leuven 1990. Pp. 323–349 (Discussion: Pp. 351–9). Open Google Scholar
  30. Manuwald, Gesine. Roman republican theatre. Cambridge 2011. Open Google Scholar
  31. Marincola, John (Ed.). A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden 2007. Open Google Scholar
  32. Id. (Ed.). Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras: History Without Historians. Edinburgh Leventis Studies. Edinburgh 2022. Open Google Scholar
  33. Mendels, Doron. „How Was Antiquity Treated in Societies with a Hellenistic Heritage? – And Why Did the Rabbis Avoid Writing History?“ In: Gardner, Gregg; Osterloh, Kevon L. (Eds.), Antiquity in Antiquity – Jewish and Christian Pasts in the Greco-Roman World. Tübingen 2008. Pp. 131–151. Open Google Scholar
  34. Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. „Vergleichende Beobachtungen zur griechisch-römischen und altchinesischen Geschichtsschreibung.“ Saeculum 48 (1997). Pp. 213–253. Open Google Scholar
  35. Oesterle, Günter (Ed.), Erinnerung, Gedächtnis, Wissen: Studien zur kulturwissenschaftlichen Gedächtnisforschung. Formen der Erinnerung 26. Göttingen 2005. Open Google Scholar
  36. Pitcher, Luke. Writing Ancient History. An Introduction to Classical Historiography. London 2009. Open Google Scholar
  37. Raphael, Lutz. Geschichtswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Extreme: Theorien, Methoden, Tendenzen von 1900 bis zur Gegenwart. München 2003. Open Google Scholar
  38. Rau, Susanne; Studt, Studt (Eds.). Geschichte schreiben: Ein Quellen- und Studienhandbuch zur Historiografie (ca. 1350–1750). Berlin 2010. Open Google Scholar
  39. Rublack, Ulinka (ed.) 2011, A concise companion to history, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  40. Rüpke, Jörg. „The ‘Connected Reader’ as a Window into Lived Ancient Religion: A Case Study of Ovid’s Libri fastorum.“ Religion in the Roman Empire 1,1 (2015). Pp. 95–113. Open Google Scholar
  41. Id. „Memory, Narrative, and the History of Religion.“ In: Klostergaard Petersen, Anders et al (Eds.), Evolution, Cognition, and the History of Religion: a New Synthesis: Festschrift in Honour of Armin W. Geertz. Leiden 2019. Pp. 536–546. Open Google Scholar
  42. Id. „Memorizing the Past and Writing Religion in the Roman Republic.“ In: Ro, Johannes Unsok; Edelman, Diana (Eds.), Collective Memory and Collective Identity. Berlin 2021. Pp. 395–426. Open Google Scholar
  43. Id. „History“, in: Stausberg, Michael; Engler, Steven (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. 2nd ed. London 2022. Pp. 324–344. Open Google Scholar
  44. Id.; Rüpke, Ulrike. Antike Götter und Mythen. München 2010. Open Google Scholar
  45. Rüsen, Jörn. Zeit und Sinn: Strategien historischen Denkens. Frankfurt am Main 1990. Open Google Scholar
  46. Id. „Some Theoretical Approaches to Intercultural Comparative Historigraphy.“ History and Theory 35,4 (1996). Pp. 5–22. Open Google Scholar
  47. Schropp, Jack W. G. Pugna litterarum: Studien zur kompetitiven Geschichtsschreibung in der griechisch-römischen Literaturelite der Kaiserzeit. Vestigia 77. München 2023. Open Google Scholar
  48. Suerbaum, Werner. „Am Scheideweg zur Zukunft: Alternative Geschehensverläufe bei römischen Historikern. Gymnasium 104 (1997). Pp. 36–54. Open Google Scholar
  49. Walter, Uwe (Ed.). Antike Geschichtsschreibung. Studien zur Historiographie. Darmstadt 2007. Open Google Scholar
  50. Ullman, B. L. „History and Tragedy.” TAPhA 73 (1942). Pp. 25–53. Open Google Scholar
  51. Wendehorst, A. „Wer konnte im Mittelalter lesen und schreiben?” In: Fried, J. (Ed.), Schulen und Studium im sozialen Wandel des hohen und späten Mittelalters. Vorträge und Forschungen 30. Sigmaringen 1986. Pp. 9–33. Open Google Scholar
  52. White, Hayden. Die Bedeutung der Form: Erzählstrukturen in der Geschichtsschreibung. Frankfurt am Main 1990. Open Google Scholar
  53. Willand, Marcus. Lesermodelle und Lesertheorien: Historische und systematische Perspektiven. Narratologia 41. Berlin 2014. Open Google Scholar
  54. Wiseman, Timothy Peter. Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter Studies in History. Exeter 1994. Open Google Scholar
  55. Id. „The Origins of Roman Historiography.“ In: Id., Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter 1994. Pp. 1–22; 119–124. Open Google Scholar
  56. Id. Remus: A Roman Myth. Cambridge 1995. Open Google Scholar
  57. Berger, Klaus. Formen und Gattungen im Neuen Testament. Tübingen 2005. Open Google Scholar
  58. Cancik, Hubert. Grundzüge der hethitischen und alttestamentlichen Geschichtsschreibung. Wiesbaden 1976. Open Google Scholar
  59. Genette, Gérard. Die Erzählung. München 1994. Open Google Scholar
  60. Goody, Jack. Entstehung und Folgen der Schriftkultur. Frankfurt am Main 1997. Open Google Scholar
  61. Grethlein, Jonas. Ancient Greek texts and modern narrative theory: Towards a critical dialogue. Cambridge 2023. Open Google Scholar
  62. Hempfer, Klaus W. Gattungstheorie. München 1973. Open Google Scholar
  63. Id. Theorien des Performativen: Sprache – Wissen – Praxis. Bielefeld 2011. Open Google Scholar
  64. Jolles, André. Einfache Formen: Legende, Sage, Mythe, Rätsel, Spruch, Kasus, Memorabile, Märchen, Witz. 6th ed. [1930]. Konzepte der Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft 15. Tübingen 1982. Open Google Scholar
  65. Kirkpatrick, Patricia. The function of ancient historiography in biblical and cognate studies. New York 2008. Open Google Scholar
  66. Martínez, Matías; Scheffel, Michael. Einführung in die Erzähltheorie. 11th rev. ed. München 2019. Open Google Scholar
  67. Waddell, Philip. Tacitean visual narrative. Bloomsbury Classical Studies Monographs. London 2020. Open Google Scholar
  68. White, Hayden. Auch Klio dichtet oder Die Fiktion des Faktischen: Studien zur Tropologie des historischen Diskurses. Sprache und Geschichte 10. Stuttgart 1986. Open Google Scholar
  69. Benoist, Stéphane. La vie des autres: histoire, prosopographie, biographie dans l’Empire romain. Villeneuve d’Ascq 2013. Open Google Scholar
  70. Blair, Stephen (Ed.). Fragmented histories: Recent and distant pasts in early Roman historiography. 2019. Open Google Scholar
  71. Burgess, Richard W. Chronicles, consuls and coins. Farnham 2011. Open Google Scholar
  72. Frier, Bruce Woodward. Libri annales pontificum maximorum: The origins of the annalistic tradition. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 27. 2nd ed. Rom 1999. Open Google Scholar
  73. Kierdorf, Wilhelm. Laudatio funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie 106. Meisenheim am Glan 1980. Open Google Scholar
  74. Rüpke, Jörg. „Triumphator and ancestor rituals between symbolic anthropology and magic.“, Numen 53 (2006). Pp. 251–289. Open Google Scholar
  75. Id. Religiöse Erinnerungskulturen: Formen der Geschichtsschreibung in der römischen Antike. Darmstadt 2012. Open Google Scholar
  76. Thomas, Rosalind. Oral Tradition and Written Record in Classical Athens. Cambridge 1989. Open Google Scholar
  77. Wiseman, Timothy Peter. „The Origins of Roman Historiography.” Id., Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter Studies in History. Exeter 1994. Pp. 1–22; 119–124. Open Google Scholar
  78. Amato, Eugenio; De Cicco, Pasqua (Eds.). Les historiens fragmentaires de langue grecque à l’époque romaine impériale et tardive. Rennes 2021. Open Google Scholar
  79. Baumann, Mario; Liotsakis, Vasileios (Eds.). Reading history in the Roman Empire. Millennium-Studien zu Kultur und Geschichte des Ersten Jahrtausends n. Chr. 98. Berlin 2022. Open Google Scholar
  80. Canfora, Luciano. Studi di storia della storiografia romana. Documenti e studi 15. Bari 1993. Open Google Scholar
  81. Damtoft Poulsen, Aske; Jönsson, Arne (Eds.). Usages of the past in Roman historiography. Historiography of Rome and its Empire 9. Leiden 2021. Open Google Scholar
  82. Gowing, Alain M. Empire and Memory – the representation of the Roman Republic in imperial culture. Roman Literature and its Contexts. Cambridge 2005. Open Google Scholar
  83. Howe, Timothy; Müller, Sabine; Stoneman, Richard (Eds.). Ancient historiography on war and empire. Oxford 2017. Open Google Scholar
  84. Lange, Carsten Hjort; Vervaet, Frederik Juliaan (Eds.). The historiography of late Republican civil war. Historiography of Rome and its Empire 5. Leiden 2019. Open Google Scholar
  85. Momigliano, Arnaldo. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Sather Classical Lectures 54. Berkeley 1990. Open Google Scholar
  86. Id., The development of Greek Biography. Cambridge 1993. Open Google Scholar
  87. Id. Ausgewählte Schriften zur Geschichte und Geschichtsschreibung. 2 vols. Stuttgart 1998–2000. Open Google Scholar
  88. Pearson, Lionel. The Greek Historians of the West: Timaeus and His Predecessors. American Philological Association: Philological Monographs 35. Atlanta 1987. Open Google Scholar
  89. Peter, Hermann. Die geschichtliche Litteratur über die römische Kaiserzeit bis Theodosius I und ihre Quellen. 2 vols. Leipzig 1897. Open Google Scholar
  90. Rohrbacher, David. The Historians of Late Antiquity. London, 2002. Open Google Scholar
  91. Rüpke, Jörg. Römische Religion in republikanischer Zeit: Rationalisierung und ritueller Wandel Darmstadt 2014. Open Google Scholar
  92. Verdin, H.; Schepens, G.; Keyser, E. de (Eds.). Purposes of History: Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B. C. Studia Hellenistica 30. Leuven 1990. Open Google Scholar
  93. Walter, Uwe. „Herodot und Thukydides – die Entstehung der Geschichtsschreibung“. In Stein-Hölkeskamp, Elke; Hölkeskamp, Karl-Joachim (Eds.), Die Griechische Welt: Erinnerungsorte der Antike. München, 2010. Pp. 400–417. Open Google Scholar
  94. Christ, Karl. Caesar: Annäherungen an einen Diktator. München 1994. Open Google Scholar
  95. Dimitrova, Miryana. Julius Caesar’s self-created image and its dramatic afterlife. Bloomsbury Studies in Classical Reception. London 2018. Open Google Scholar
  96. Gärtner, Hans Arnim. Beobachtungen zu Bauelementen in der antiken Historiographie besonders bei Livius und Caesar. Historia Einzelschriften 25. Wiesbaden 1975. Open Google Scholar
  97. Gaertner, Jan Felix; Hausburg, Bianca. Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum: An analysis of style, narrative technique, and the reception of Greek historiography. Hypomnemata 192. Göttingen 2013. Open Google Scholar
  98. Grillo, Luca; Krebs, Christopher (Eds.), Cambridge Companion to Caesar. Cambridge 2014. Open Google Scholar
  99. Hass, Trine Arlund, and Rubina Raja (Eds.). Caesar’s Past and Posterity’s Caesar. Roman Studies. Turnhout 2021. Open Google Scholar
  100. Koortbojian, Michael. The divinization of Caesar and Augustus. Precedents, consequences, implications. New York 2013. Open Google Scholar
  101. Morstein-Marx, Robert. Julius Caesar and the Roman people. Cambridge 2021. Open Google Scholar
  102. Müller, Marvin. Der andere Blick auf Caesars Kriege: eine narratologische Analyse der vier Supplemente im “Corpus Caesarianum”. Philologus Suppl. 15. Berlin 2021. Open Google Scholar
  103. Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner. Erzählstil und Propaganda in Caesars Kommentarien. Heidelberger Forschungen 15. Heidelberg 1975. Open Google Scholar
  104. Raaflaub, Kurt A.; John T. Ramsey. „Reconstructing the chronology of Caesar’s ‘Gallic wars’.“ Histos: The On-Line Journal of Ancient Historiography 11 (2017). Pp. 1–74. Open Google Scholar
  105. Rambaud, Michel. L’art de la déformation historique dans les commentaires de César. Annales de l’Université de Lyon. 3ième série. Lettres fasc. 23. Paris 1953. Open Google Scholar
  106. Ramsey, John T.; Kurt A. Raaflaub. „Chronological tables for Caesar’s wars (58–45 BCE).“ Histos: The On-Line Journal of Ancient Historiography 11 (2017). Pp. 162–217. Open Google Scholar
  107. Rüpke, Jörg. „Wer las Caesars bella als commentarii?” Gymnasium 99 (1992), 201–226. Open Google Scholar
  108. Id. „Caesar: Priesthoods, Gods, and Stars.“ In: Grillo, Luca; Krebs, Christopher (Eds.), Cambridge Companion to Caesar. Cambridge 2014. Pp. 58–67. Open Google Scholar
  109. Westall, Richard. Caesar’s “Civil war”: Historical reality and fabrication. Mnemosyne. Suppl. 410. Leiden 2018. Open Google Scholar
  110. Will, Wolfgang. Caesar. Darmstadt 2009. Open Google Scholar
  111. Briscoe, John. A commentary on Livy B. 31–45. Oxford 1973–2016. Open Google Scholar
  112. Chaplin, Jane D. Livy. Oxford 2009. Open Google Scholar
  113. Davies, Jason. Rome’s religious history: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their gods. Cambridge 2004. Open Google Scholar
  114. Boris Dunsch, „'Exemplo aliis esse debetis': Cincinnatus in der antiken Literatur.“ In: Niggemann, Ulrich; Ruffing, Kai (Eds.), Antike als Modell in Nordamerika? Beiheft der Historischen Zeitschrift 55. München 2011. Pp. 219–247. Open Google Scholar
  115. Feeney, Denis. „The History of Roman Religion in Roman Historiography and Epic.“ In Rüpke, Jörg (Ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion. Oxford 2007. Pp. 129–142. Open Google Scholar
  116. Feldherr, Andrew. Spectacle and society in Livy‘s History. Berkeley 1998. Open Google Scholar
  117. Forsythe, Gary. Livy and Early Rome: A study in historical method and judgment. Stuttgart 1999. Open Google Scholar
  118. Gärtner, Hans Arnim. Beobachtungen zu Bauelementen in der antiken Historiographie besonders bei Livius und Caesar. Wiesbaden 1975. Open Google Scholar
  119. Gutberlet, Dagmar. Die erste Dekade des Livius als Quelle zur gracchischen und sullanischen Zeit. Hildesheim 1985. Open Google Scholar
  120. Haehling, Raban von. Zeitbezüge des T. Livius in der ersten Dekade seines Geschichtswerkes: Nec vitia nostra nec remedia pati possumus. Historia Einzelschriften 61. Stuttgart 1989. Open Google Scholar
  121. Keegan, Peter. Livy’s women: Crisis, resolution, and the female in Rome’s foundation history. Abingdon 2021. Open Google Scholar
  122. Levene, D. S. Religion in Livy. Mnemosyne Suppl. 127. Leiden 1993. Open Google Scholar
  123. Id. Livy, The fragments and periochae. 2 vols. New York 2023–. Open Google Scholar
  124. Luce, Tarrey James. Livy: The Composition of His History. Princeton 1977. Open Google Scholar
  125. Id. „Livy and Dionysius.” In: Brock, R.; Woodman, A. J. (Eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: Roman Comedy, Augustan Poetry, Historiography. ARCA 33. Leeds 1995. Pp. 225–239. Open Google Scholar
  126. Mali, Yosef. Mythistory: The making of modern historiography. Chicago, 2003. Open Google Scholar
  127. Meunier, Nicolas L. J. „Tite-Live et la Rome archaïque." Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome. Antiquité 131,1 (2019). Pp. 5–80. Open Google Scholar
  128. Mineo, Bernard. Tite-Live et l’histoire de Rome. Paris, 2006. Open Google Scholar
  129. Moles, John. „Livy’s Preface.” PCPS 39 (1993). Pp. 141–168. Open Google Scholar
  130. Musti, Domenico. „Tendenze della storiografia romana e greca su Roma arcaica: Studi su Livio e Dionigi d’Alicarnasso.” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 10 (1970). Pp. 5–158. Open Google Scholar
  131. Oakley, Stephen. Commentary on Livy. 4 vols. Oxford 1997–2005. Open Google Scholar
  132. Ogilvie, R. M. A Commentary on Livy: Book 1–5. Oxford 1965. Open Google Scholar
  133. Reeve, Michael D. „The Transmission of Florus’ Epitoma de Tito Livio and the Periochae.” CQ 38 (1988), 477–491. Open Google Scholar
  134. Roncaglia, Alessandro (Ed.). Livio “ad urbem condendam”: Riletture del passato in età augustea. Zermeghedo 2021. Open Google Scholar
  135. Rüpke, Jörg. „Livius, Priesternamen und die annales maximi.” Klio 74 (1993). Pp. 155–179. Open Google Scholar
  136. Id. "Divine Names and Naming the Divine in Livy." In: Bonnet, Corinne; Palamidis, Alaya (Eds.), What’s in a Divine Name? Religious Systems and Human Agency in the Ancient Mediterranean. Berlin 2024. Pp. 121–138. Open Google Scholar
  137. Schlip, Clemens. Typen, Gruppen und Individuen bei Livius: Untersuchungen zur Darstellung und Funktion historischer Akteure in « Ab urbe condita ». Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 377. Berlin 2020. Open Google Scholar
  138. Schmidt, Peter Lebrecht. Iulius Obsequens und das Problem der Livius-Epitome: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der lateinischen Prodigienliteratur. Akademie der Wissenschaften und Literatur Mainz, Abhandlungen der geistes- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Klasse 1968,5. Wiesbaden 1968. Open Google Scholar
  139. Thraede, Klaus. „Außerwissenschaftliche Faktoren im Liviusbild der neueren Forschung.” Binder, Gerhard (Ed.), Saeculum Augustum 2: Religion und Literatur. Wege der Forschung 512. Darmstadt 1988. Pp. 394–425. Open Google Scholar
  140. Walsh, P. G. Livy: His Historical Aims and Methods. Cambridge 1961. Open Google Scholar
  141. Zenk, Johannes. Die Anfänge Roms erzählen: Zur literarischen Technik in der ersten Pentade von Liviusʼ ab urbe condita. Berlin 2021. Open Google Scholar
  142. Duchêne, Pauline. "Suetonius’ construction of his historiographical ‘auctoritas’." In Liotsakis, Vasileios; Farrington, Scott (Eds.). The art of history : literary perspectives on Greek and Roman historiography. Berlin 2016. Pp. 271–288. Open Google Scholar
  143. Dunsch, Boris. „Variationen des metus-hostilis-Gedankens bei Sallust (Cat. 10; Iug. 41; Hist. 1, fr. 11 und 12 M.).“ Grazer Beiträge 25 (2006). Pp. 201–217. Open Google Scholar
  144. Fuhrer, Therese. „Zur biographischen Modellierung des historiographischen Ichs bei Sallust, Livius und Tacitus.“ In: Bitto, Gregor; Gauly, Bardo Maria (Eds.), Auf der Suche nach Autofiktion in der antiken Literatur. Berlin 2021. Pp. 131–150. Open Google Scholar
  145. Gärtner, Hans Arnim. „Erzählformen bei Sallust.” Historia 35 (1986). Pp. 449–473. Open Google Scholar
  146. Gerrish, Jennifer. Sallust’s « Histories » and Triumviral historiography: confronting the end of history, Routledge Studies in Ancient History. London 2019. Open Google Scholar
  147. Levene, David S. „Sallust’s Jugurtha: An „Historical Fragment.“ Journal of Roman Studies 82 (1992). Pp. 53–70. Open Google Scholar
  148. Marcone, Arnaldo. Sallustio: Storiografia e politca nella Roma tardorepubblicana. Rom 2023. Open Google Scholar
  149. Samotta, Iris. Das Vorbild der Vergangenheit: Geschichtsbild und Reformvorschläge bei Cicero und Sallust. Stuttgart 2009. Open Google Scholar
  150. Scanlon, Thomas F. Spes frustrata: A Reading of Sallust. Heidelberg 1987. Open Google Scholar
  151. Schmal, Stephan. Sallust. Hildesheim 2001. Open Google Scholar
  152. Shaw, Edwin. “Sallust, the ‘lector eruditus’ and the purposes of history.” In: Baumann, Mario; Liotsakis, Vasileios (Eds.), Reading history in the Roman Empire. Berlin 2022. Pp. 13–33. Open Google Scholar
  153. Syme, Ronald. Sallust. Berkeley 2002. Open Google Scholar
  154. Zathammer, Stefan. Sallust, Bellum Iugurthinum: Studienkommentar. Göttingen 2022. Open Google Scholar
  155. Honstetter, Robert. Exemplum zwischen Rhetorik und Literatur: Zur gattungsgeschichtlichen Sonderstellung von Valerius Maximus und Augustinus. Diss. Konstanz 1977. Open Google Scholar
  156. Langlands, Rebecca. Exemplary ethics in ancient Rome. Cambridge 2018. Open Google Scholar
  157. Lucarelli, Ute. Exemplarische Vergangenheit: Valerius Maximus und die Konstruktion des sozialen Raumes in der frühen Kaiserzeit. Hypomnemata 172. Göttingen 2007. Open Google Scholar
  158. Mueller, Hans-Friedrich. Roman religion in Valerius Maximus. London 2002. Open Google Scholar
  159. Murray, Jeffrey; Wardle, David. Reading by example: Valerius Maximus and the historiography of exempla. Historiography of Rome and its empire 11. Leiden 2022. Open Google Scholar
  160. Roller, Matthew B. Models from the past in Roman culture: A world of exempla. Cambridge 2018. Open Google Scholar
  161. Rüpke, Jörg. „Knowledge of Religion in Valerius Maximus’ Exempla: Roman Historiography and Tiberian Memory Culture.“ In: Galinsky, Karl (Ed.), Memory in Ancient Romne and Early Christianity. Oxford 2016. Pp. 89–111. Open Google Scholar
  162. Skidmore, Clive [Julian]. Practical Ethics for Roman Gentlemen: The work of Valerius Maximus. Exeter 1996. Open Google Scholar
  163. Tschögele, Thomas. Die Erzählungen des Valerius Maximus. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften. Heidelberg 2022. Open Google Scholar
  164. Davies, Jason. Rome’s Religious history: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their gods. Cambridge 2004. Open Google Scholar
  165. Devillers, Olivier. Tacite et les sources des Annales: Enquêtes sur la méthode historique. Louvain 2003. Open Google Scholar
  166. Dihle, Albrecht. „Tacitus’ ‘Agricola’ und das Problem der historischen Biographie.” AU 31,5 (1988). Pp. 42–52. Open Google Scholar
  167. Fertik, Harriet. „Learning from women: Mothers, slaves, and regime change in Tacitus’ ‘Dialogue on orators’." Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek and Roman Political Thought 37,2 (2020). Pp. 245–264. Open Google Scholar
  168. Heldmann, Konrad. Sine ira et studio: Das Subjektivitätsprinzip der römischen Geschichtsschreibung und das Selbstverständnis antiker Historiker. München 2011. Open Google Scholar
  169. Heubner, Heinz, P. Cornelius Tacitus: Die Historien. Kommentare zu Tacitus, Annales und Historiae. 5 vols. Heidelberg 1963–1982. Open Google Scholar
  170. Id. Kommentar zum Agricola des Tacitus. Göttingen 1984. Open Google Scholar
  171. Koestermann, Erich. Cornelius Tacitus, Annalen. 4 vols. Heidelberg 1963–1968. Open Google Scholar
  172. Kompatscher-Gufler, Gabriela. Tacitus, Germania: Studienkommentar. Göttingen 2024. Open Google Scholar
  173. Leidl, Christoph G. „Reading spaces, observing spectators in Tacitus’ ‘Histories’." In: Baumann, Mario; Liotsakis, Vasileios (Eds.), Reading history in the Roman Empire. Berlin 2022. Pp. 175–192. Open Google Scholar
  174. Lund, Allan A. „Zur Schilderung der germanischen Gesellschaft bei Caesar und Tacitus.” Classica & Medievalia 36 (1985). Pp. 177–197. Open Google Scholar
  175. Marshall, Anthony J. „Ladies in Waiting: The Role of Women in Tacitus’ Histories.” Ancient Society 15–17 (1984–86). Pp. 167–184. Open Google Scholar
  176. Mellor, Ronald. Tacitus. New York 1993. Open Google Scholar
  177. Id. Tacitus’ Annals. Oxford 2011. Open Google Scholar
  178. Momigliano, Arnaldo. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. With a Foreword by Riccardo Di Donato. Sather Classical Lectures 54. Berkeley 1990. Open Google Scholar
  179. Norden, Eduard. Die Germanische Urgeschichte in Tacitus Germania. Leipzig 1920. Open Google Scholar
  180. Sailor, Dylan. Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge 2008. Open Google Scholar
  181. Sinclair, Patrick. Tacitus the Sententious Historian: A Sociology of Rhetoric in Annales 1–6. University Park 1995. Open Google Scholar
  182. Städele, Alfons. „Tacitus über Agricola und Domitian (Agr. 39–43).” Gymnasium 95 (1988) 222–235. Open Google Scholar
  183. Senkbeil, Friderike. Tacitus und Rom: Die urbs Roma als Raum der erzählten Welt in den Historien und Annalen. Heidelberg 2022. Open Google Scholar
  184. Suerbaum, Werner. „Summe eines Lebens – Summe einer Lektüre: Eine ’Leistungsmessung’ der Rezeption von Tacitus’ ‚Agricola’.” AU 30,6 (1987), S. 83–99. Open Google Scholar
  185. Syme, Ronald. Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford 1958. Open Google Scholar
  186. Syme, Ronald. Ten studies in Tacitus. Oxford 1970. Open Google Scholar
  187. ten Berge, Bram L. H. Writing imperial history: Tacitus from Agricola to Annales. Ann Arbor 2023. Open Google Scholar
  188. Timpe, Dieter. Romano-Germanica: Gesammelte Studien zur Germania des Tacitus. Stuttgart 1995. Open Google Scholar
  189. Barnes, Timothy David. Ammianus Marcellinus and the representation of historical reality. Ithaca 1998. Open Google Scholar
  190. Brodka, Dariusz. Ammianus Marcellinus. Studien zum Geschichtsdenken im vierten Jahrhundert Open Google Scholar
  191. n. Chr. Krakau 2009. Open Google Scholar
  192. Creer, Tyler. „Ethnography and the Roman digressions of Ammianus Marcellinus.“ Histos: The On-Line Journal of Ancient Historiography 14 (2020). Pp. 255–274. Open Google Scholar
  193. den Boeft, Jan. Philological and historical commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus. Leiden, 2008. Open Google Scholar
  194. Drijvers, Jan Willem; Hunt, David (Eds.), The Late Roman World and its Historian: Interpreting Ammianus Marcellinus. London 1999. Open Google Scholar
  195. Elliott, T. G. Ammianus Marcellinus and Fourth Century History. Toronto 1983. Open Google Scholar
  196. Matthews, John F. „The Origin of Ammianus.” CQ 44 (1994). Pp. 252–269. Open Google Scholar
  197. Id. The Roman Empire of Ammianus. London 1989. Open Google Scholar
  198. Richter, Ulrike. „Die Funktion der Digressionen im Werk Ammians.” WüJbb NF 15 (1989). Pp. 209–222. Open Google Scholar
  199. Ross, Alan. „Ammianus and the written past.“ In: Devillers, Olivier; Battistin Sebastiani, Breno (Eds.), Sources et modèles des historiens anciens. Bordeaux 2018. Pp. 319–334. Open Google Scholar
  200. Sabbah, G. „Ammianus Marcellinus.“ In: Marasco, G. (Ed.), Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity: Fourth to Sixth Century AD. Leiden 2003. Pp. 43–84. Open Google Scholar
  201. Sánchez Vendramini, Darío N. „The audience of Ammianus Marcellinus and the circulation of books in the late Roman world." Journal of Ancient History 6,2 (2018). Pp. 234–259. Open Google Scholar
  202. Bertrand, Estelle. „Imperialism and the crisis of the Roman Republic: Dio’s view on late Republican conquests (Books 36–40).“ In: Osgood, Josiah; Baron, Christopher (Eds.), Cassius Dio and the late Roman Republic. Leiden 2019. Pp. 19–35. Open Google Scholar
  203. Ead. „Cassius Dio and the Roman Empire: The impact of the Severan wars on Dio’s narrative.“ In: Lange, Carsten Hjort; Scott, Andrew G. (Eds.), Cassius Dio: The impact of violence, war, and civil war. Leiden 2020. Pp. 120–137. Open Google Scholar
  204. Chrysanthou, Chrysanthos S. Reconfiguring the Imperial past : narrative patterns and historical interpretation in Herodian’s « History of the Empire ». Historiography of Rome and its Empire 15. Leiden 2022. Open Google Scholar
  205. Fromentin, Valérie. „Pour une archéologie des discours dans l’’Histoire romaine’ de Cassius Dion (livres 1–21): Le témoignage de Zonaras." In: Amato, Eugenio; De Cicco, Pasqua (Eds.), Les historiens fragmentaires de langue grecque à l’époque romaine impériale et tardive. Rennes 2021. Pp. 117–131. Open Google Scholar
  206. Gabba, Emilio. Dionysius and The History of Archaic Rome. Sather Classical Lectures 56. Berkeley 1991. Open Google Scholar
  207. Galimberti, Alessandro (Ed.). Herodian’s world: Empire and emperors in the III century. Historiography of Rome and its Empire 12. Leiden 2022. Open Google Scholar
  208. Goldmann, Bernhard. Einheitlichkeit und Eigenständigkeit der Historia Romana des Appian. Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft 6. Hildesheim 1988. Open Google Scholar
  209. Hose, Martin. Erneuerung der Vergangenheit: Die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 45. Stuttgart 1994. Open Google Scholar
  210. Id. „Historiographie in der Krise: Herausforderungen und Lösungen der Geschichtsschreibung im dritten Jahrhundert n. Chr.“ In: Mitthof, Fritz; Martin, Gunther; Grusková, Jana (Eds.), Empire in crisis: Gothic invasions and Roman historiography. Wien 2020. Pp. 35–49. Open Google Scholar
  211. Meins, Friedrich. Paradigmatische Geschichte: Wahrheit, Theorie und Methode in den “Antiquitates Romanae” des Dionysios von Halikarnassos. Palingenesia 113. Stuttgart 2019. Open Google Scholar
  212. Musti, Domenico. „Tendenze della storiografia romana e greca su Roma arcaica: Studi su Livio e Dionigi d’Alicarnasso.“ Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 10 (1970), 5–158. Open Google Scholar
  213. Pelling, Christopher. „The Greek Historians of Rome.“ In: Marincola, John (Ed.) A Companion to Greek an Roman Historiography. Volume 1, Malden, 2007. Pp. 244–258. Open Google Scholar
  214. Séguin, Brigitte Amat. „Denys d’Halicarnasse et la prise de Rome par les Gaulois: Réflexions sur la méthode d’un rhéteur historien.” MEFRA 101 (1989). Pp. 143–157. Open Google Scholar
  215. Verdin, Herman. „La fonction de l’histoire selon Denys d’Halicarnasse.” Ancient Society 5 (1974). Pp. 289–307. Open Google Scholar
  216. Welch, Kathryn. „Appian and civil war: A history without an ending." In: Lange, Carsten Hjort; Vervaet, Frederik Juliaan (Eds.), The historiography of late Republican civil war. Leiden 2019. Pp. 439–466. Open Google Scholar
  217. Barnes, T. D. The Sources of the Historia Augusta. Brüssel 1978. Open Google Scholar
  218. Baslez, Marie-Françoise; Hoffmann, Philippe; Pernot, Laurent (Eds.). L'invention de l'autobiographie d'Hésiode à Saint Augustin. Études de littérature ancienne 5. Paris 1993. Open Google Scholar
  219. Baum, Armin D. „Biographien im alttestamentlich-rabbinischen Stil: Zur Gattung der neutestamentlichen Evangelien.“ Biblica 94,4 (2013). Pp. 534–564. Open Google Scholar
  220. Birley, A.R. „The Historia Augusta and pagan historiography“ In: Marasco, Gabriele (Ed.),Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity. Fourth to Sixth Century AD. Leiden 2003. Pp. 127–149. Open Google Scholar
  221. Cancik, Hubert (Ed.). Markus-Philologie: Historische, literargeschichtliche und stilistische Untersuchungen zum zweiten Evangelium. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 33. Tübingen 1984. Open Google Scholar
  222. Cox Miller, Patricia. „Strategies of Representation in Collective Biography: Constructing the Subject as Holy.“ In: Hägg, Tomas; Rousseau, Philip (Eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley 2000. Pp. 209–254. Open Google Scholar
  223. Cox, Patricia. 1983. Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 5. Berkeley 1983. Open Google Scholar
  224. De Temmerman, Koen; Demoen, Kristoffel (Eds.). Writing biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative technique and fictionalization. Cambridge 2016. Open Google Scholar
  225. den Hengst, Daniel. Emperors and historiography. Leiden 2010. Open Google Scholar
  226. Dunsch, Boris; Prokoph, Felix M. (Eds.). Geschichte und Gegenwart. Beiträge zu Cornelius Nepos aus Fachwissenschaft, Fachdidaktik und Unterrichtspraxis. Mit einem Forschungsbericht und einer Arbeitsbibliographie. Philippika. Altertumswissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 91. Wiesbaden 2015. Open Google Scholar
  227. Falaschi, Eva. „Pliny the Elder and the portraits of ancient authors.“ In: Tischer, Ute; Gärtner, Ursula; Forst, Alexandra (Eds.), “Ut pictura poeta”: Author images and the reading of ancient literature. Turnhout 2022. Pp. 51–78. Open Google Scholar
  228. Frézouls, Edmond. „Le rôle politique des femmes dans l’Histoire Auguste.” In: Bonamente, Giorgio; Paschoud, François (Eds.), Historiae Augustae Collquium Genevense. Historiae Augustae Colloquia n. Pp. 2. Bari 1994. Pp. 121–136. Open Google Scholar
  229. Gentili, Bruno; Cerri, Giovanni. History and Biography in Ancient Thought. London Studies in Classical Philology 20. Amsterdam 1988. Open Google Scholar
  230. Hägg, Tomas. The Art of Biography in Antiquity. Cambridge 2012. Open Google Scholar
  231. Honoré, Tony. „Scriptor historiae Augustae.” JRS 77 (1987). Pp. 156–176. Open Google Scholar
  232. Insley, Sarah; Mellon Saint-Laurent, Jeanne-Nicole. „Biography, autobiography, and hagiography.“ In McGill, Scott; Watts, Edward J. (Eds.), A companion to late antique literature. Hoboken, NJ 2018. Pp. 373–387. Open Google Scholar
  233. Kaster, Robert A. Suetonius Tranquillus, De grammaticis et rhetoribus. Oxford 1995. Open Google Scholar
  234. Kolb, Frank. Untersuchungen zur Historia Augusta. Bonn 1987. Open Google Scholar
  235. Lindsay, Hugh. „Suetonius as ab Epistulis to Hadrian and the Early History of the Imperial Correspondence.” Historia 43 (1994), 454–468. Open Google Scholar
  236. McGing, Brian, Mossman, Judith (Eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea 2006. Open Google Scholar
  237. Papaconstantinou, Arietta (Ed.), Writing 'True Stories': Historians and Hagiographers in the Late Antique and Medieval Near East. Cultural Encounters in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages 9. Turnhout, 2010. Open Google Scholar
  238. Romney, Jessica. „Solon and the democratic biographical tradition.“ In: Currie, Bruno; Rutherford, Ian (Eds.), The reception of Greek lyric poetry in the ancient world: transmission, canonization and paratext. Leiden 2020. Pp. 373–394. Open Google Scholar
  239. Smith, Christopher. The lost memoirs of Augustus and the development of Roman autobiography. Swansea 2009. Open Google Scholar
  240. Sonnabend, Holger. Geschichte der antiken Biographie: Von Isokrates bis zur Historia Augusta. Stuttgart 2002. Open Google Scholar
  241. Beard, M. et al. Literacy in the Roman world. Journal of Roman Archaeology, Suppl. 3. Ann Arbor 1991. Open Google Scholar
  242. Bleckmann, Bruno. Fiktion als Geschichte: Neue Studien zum Autor der Hellenika Oxyrhynchia und zur Historiographie des vierten vorchristlichen Jahrhunderts, Göttingen 2006. Open Google Scholar
  243. Burgess, R. W. The Chronicle of Hydatius and the Consularia Constantinopolitana: Two Contemporary Accounts of the Final Years of the Roman Empire. Oxford 1993. Open Google Scholar
  244. Burgess, Richard W.; Kulikowski, Michael, Mosaics of Time: The Latin ChronicleTraditions from the First Century BC to the Sixth Century AD 1: A Historical Introduction to the Chronicle Genre from its Origins to the High Middle Ages. Studies in the Early Middle Ages 33. Leuven 2013. Open Google Scholar
  245. Chaniotis, Angelos. Historie und Historiker in den griechischen Inschriften: Epigraphische Beiträge zur griechischen Historiographie. Heidelberger Althistorische Beiträge und Epigraphische Studien 4. Stuttgart 1988. Open Google Scholar
  246. Clarke, Katherine. Making Time for the Past: Local History and the Polis. Oxford 2008. Open Google Scholar
  247. Cowan, Eleanor (Ed.). Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea 2011. Open Google Scholar
  248. Muhlberger, Steven. The Fifth-Century Chroniclers: Prosper, Hydatius, and the Gallic Chronicler of 452. ARCA 27. Leeds 1990. Open Google Scholar
  249. Reeve, Michael D. „The Transmission of Florus’ Epitoma de Tito Livio and the Periochae.” CQ 38 (1988). Pp. 477–491. Open Google Scholar
  250. Rüpke, Jörg. „Geschichtsschreibung in Listenform: Beamtenlisten unter römischen Kalendern.” Philologus 141 (1997). Pp. 65–85. Open Google Scholar
  251. Id. „Geteilte und umstrittene Geschichte: Der Chronograph von 354 und die Katakombe an der Via Latina,” In: Leppin, Hartmut (Ed.), Antike Mythologie in christlichen Kontexten der Spätantike, Berlin 2015. Pp. 221–238. Open Google Scholar
  252. Salzman, Michele Renee. On Roman Time: The Codex-Calendar of 354 and the Rhythms of Urban Life in Late Antiquity. Transformation of the Classical Heritage 17. Berkeley 1990. Open Google Scholar
  253. Schmitzer, Ulrich. Velleius Paterculus und das Interesse an der Geschichte im Zeitalter des Tiberius. Bibliothek der klassischen Altertumswissenschaften Reihe 2 N.F. 107. Heidelberg 2000. Open Google Scholar
  254. Steffensen, Nils. Nachdenken über Rom. Literarische Konstruktionen der römischen Geschichte in der Formierungsphase des Principats. Historia Einzelschriften 252. Stuttgart 2018. Open Google Scholar
  255. Alonso-Núñez, J. M. „The Emergence of Universal Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B. C.” In: Verdin, H.; Schepens, G.; Keyser, E. de (Eds.), Purposes of History: Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries B. C. Studia Hellenistica 30. Leuven 1990. Pp. 253–266. Open Google Scholar
  256. Becker, Eve-Marie (Ed.), Die antike Historiographie und die Anfänge der christlichen Geschichtsschreibung. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 129. Berlin 2005. Open Google Scholar
  257. Brincken, Anna-Dorothee von den. Studien zur lateinischen Weltchronistik bis in das Zeitalter Ottos von Freising. Düsseldorf 1957. Open Google Scholar
  258. Cameron, Averil. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse. Sather Classical Lectures 55. Berkeley 1991 Open Google Scholar
  259. Deun, P. van. „The Church Historians after Eusebius.“ In: Marasco, Gabriele (Ed.) Greek and Roman Historiography in Late Antiquity: Fourth to Sixth Century AD, Leiden 2003. Pp. 151–176. Open Google Scholar
  260. Dignas, Beate; Smith, R. R. R. (Eds.). Historical and religious memory in the ancient world. Oxford 2012. Open Google Scholar
  261. Frank, Rebecca. „A Roman Olympias: Powerful women in the ‘Historiae Philippicae’ of Pompeius Trogus.“ In: Howe, Timothy; Pownall, Frances; Poletti, Beatrice (Eds.), Ancient Macedonians in Greek and Roman sources: Φrom history to historiography. Swansea 2018. Pp. 41–58. Open Google Scholar
  262. Goetz, H. W. Die Geschichtstheologie des Orosius. Darmstadt 1980. Open Google Scholar
  263. Grafton, Anthony; Williams, Megan. Christianity and the Transformation of the Boοk: Origen, Eusebius, and the Librara of Caesarea. Cambridge 2006. Open Google Scholar
  264. Green, T. M. Zosimus, Orosius and their Tradition: Comparative Studies in Pagan and Christian Historiography. New York 1974. Open Google Scholar
  265. Hofmann, Dagmar. Griechische Weltgeschichte auf Latein: Iustins “Epitoma historiarum Pompei Trogi” und die Geschichtskonzeption des Pompeius Trogus. Hermes Einzelschriften 114. Stuttgart 2018. Open Google Scholar
  266. Inglebert, Hervé. Le monde, l'histoire: Essai sur les histoires universelles. Paris 2014. Open Google Scholar
  267. Momigliano, Arnaldo. „Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century.” In: Id. (Ed.), The Conflict Between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century. Oxford 1963. Pp. 79–99. Open Google Scholar
  268. Id. The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. With a Foreword by Riccardo Di Donato. Sather Classical Lectures 54. Berkeley 1990. Open Google Scholar
  269. Morgan, Teresa . „Eusebius of Caesarea and Christian Historiography“, Athenaeum 93 (2005). Pp. 193–208. Open Google Scholar
  270. Timpe, Dieter. „Was ist Kirchengeschichte? Zum Gattungscharakter der Historia Ecclesiastica des Eusebius.” In: Walter, Uwe (Ed.), Antike Geschichtsschreibung. Studien zur Historiographie, Darmstadt 2007. Pp. 292–328. Open Google Scholar
  271. Verdoner, Marie. Narrated Reality: The Historia ecclesiastica of Eusebius of Caesarea: Early Christianity in the Context of Antiquity. Frankfurt am Main 2011. Open Google Scholar
  272. Backhaus, Knut. Historiographie und fiktionales Erzählen: zur Konstruktivität in Geschichtstheorie und Exegese. Neukirchen-Vluyn 2007. Open Google Scholar
  273. Becker, Eve-Marie. „The gospel of Mark in the context of ancient historiography.“ In: P. G. Kirkpatrick; Goltz, T. D. (Eds.), The function of ancient historiography in biblical and cognate studies. New York 2008. Pp. 124–34. Open Google Scholar
  274. Ead. „Literarisierung und Kanonisierung im frühen Christentum: Einführende Überlegungen zur Entstehung und Bedeutung des neutestamentlichen Kanons.“ In: Ead.; Scholz, S. (Eds.), Kanon in Konstruktion und Dekonstruktion: Kanonisierungsprozesse religiöser Texte von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Ein Handbuch. Berlin 2012. Pp. 389–397. Open Google Scholar
  275. Berschin, Walter. Biographie und Epochenstil im lateinischen Mittelalter. 2 vols. Quellen und Untersuchungen zur lateinischen Philologie des Mittelalters 8–9. Stuttgart 1986. Open Google Scholar
  276. De Temmerman, Koen (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Biography. Oxford 2020. Open Google Scholar
  277. Ehrman, Bart D. Lost Scriptures: Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament. Oxford 2003. Open Google Scholar
  278. Fotopoulos, John; Aune, David Edward (Eds.). The New Testament and early Christian literature in Greco-Roman context. Studies in honor of David E. Aune. Supplements to Novum Testamentum 122. Leiden 2006. Open Google Scholar
  279. Grafton, Anthony; Williams, Megan Hale. Christianity and the transformation of the book. Origen, Eusebius, and the library of Caesarea. Cambridge, Mass. 2006. Open Google Scholar
  280. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich; Link-Heer, Ursula; Spangenberg, Peter-Michael (Eds.). La litterature historiographique des origines à 1500. 3 vols. Grundriss der romanischen Literaturen des Mittelalters 11/1. Heidelberg 1986–87. Open Google Scholar
  281. Holdsworth, Christopher; Wiseman, Timothy Peter (Eds.). The Inheritance of Historiography 350–900. Exeter Studies in History 12. Exeter 1986. Open Google Scholar
  282. Laudage, Johannes (Ed.). Von Fakten und Fiktionen. Köln 2003. Open Google Scholar
  283. Rajak, Tessa. Translation and Survival: The Greek Bible of the Ancient Jewish Diaspora. Translation & Survival. Oxford JAHR. Open Google Scholar
  284. Sandnes, Karl Olav. The challenge of Homer: School, Pagan poets and early Christianity. Library of New Testament studies 400. London 2009. Open Google Scholar
  285. Schmale, Franz-Josef. Funktion und Formen mittelalterlicher Geschichtsschreibung: Eine Einführung. Mit einem Beitrag von Hans-Werner Goetz. Darmstadt 1993. Open Google Scholar
  286. Vinzent, Markus. Christi Thora: Die Entstehung des Neuen Testaments im 2. Jahrhundert. Freiburg/Br. 2022. Open Google Scholar
  287. Id. Writing the history of early Christianity: From reception to retrospection. Cambridge 2019. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "History General", "Linguistics"
Cover of Volume: Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft Volume 73 (2025), Edition 12
Volume No access
Volume 73 (2025), Edition 12
Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft
Cover of book: Dramen-Analyse
Educational Book No access
Einführung
Dramen-Analyse
Cover of book: Kommunisten und Kommunistinnen gegen NS-Regime und Faschismus
Book Titles No access
Illegale KPD – „Spanienkämpfer“ – Kölner „Komitee der Volksfront“
Kommunisten und Kommunistinnen gegen NS-Regime und Faschismus
Cover of book: Die Wirkung der Wiedergutmachung
Edited Book No access
Internationale Perspektiven auf die Erfahrungsgeschichte der deutschen Entschädigung für nationalsozialistisches Unrecht
Die Wirkung der Wiedergutmachung
Cover of book: Kooperation und Konkurrenz in Wissenschaft und Forschungspolitik (ca. 1970–2000)
Edited Book No access
Kooperation und Konkurrenz in Wissenschaft und Forschungspolitik (ca. 1970–2000)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex