Cover of book: The Human Rights Discourse between Liberty and Welfare
Buy in shop
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Book Titles No access

The Human Rights Discourse between Liberty and Welfare

A Dialogue with Jacques Maritain and Amartya Sen
Authors:
Publisher:
 14.11.2017

Summary

Given the fact that the prevalent political debates about the status and significance of liberty and welfare are almost polarised, this book defends both of them as essential to human dignity and well-being. Amartya Sen’s capability approach is the result of his constructive criticism of John Rawls’ political liberalism. Though Jacques Maritain is often regarded as the forerunner of Rawls, he has not yet been discussed in relation to Sen’s capability approach. Despite Maritain’s pioneering contributions to human rights discourse in the twentieth century, his personalism only insufficiently reflects and explains the demands of welfare rights. In view of this shared deficit in liberal traditions, this book argues that Sen’s human rights discourse, with its “goal rights system”, persuasively integrates both liberty and welfare rights. In addition, it merges both human rights and human development discourses, consequently laying a solid foundation for a rights-based approach to development.

Bibliographic data

Publication year
2017
Publication date
14.11.2017
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-4141-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-8449-1
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Series
Ethik in den Sozialwissenschaften
Volume
3
Language
English
Pages
492
Product type
Book Titles

Table of contents

ChapterPages
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis No access 1 - 14
    1. 1. The Context: Increasing Inequality in a Prospering World No access
    2. 2. The Problem: The Question of Liberty Rights and Welfare Rights No access
    3. 3. The Objective: Mutual Enforcement of Human Rights and Human Development No access
      1. 4.1. The Interplay of the Maritain-Rawls-Sen Triad No access
      2. 4.2. The Genesis of Human Rights No access
        1. 4.3.1. A comparative approach to a practical agreement on principles of action: liberty No access
        2. 4.3.2. A realization-focused approach: welfare No access
      4. 4.4. Towards the Major Argument of the Book No access
      1. 5.1. Scope, Delimitation and Methodology No access
      2. 5.2. The Structure of the Book No access
      3. 5.3. The Language No access
      4. 5.4. Sen’s Name, Editions and Bibliography No access
      1. 1. Socialist Influences: The Young Maritain No access
      2. 2. Conversion to Metaphysics: Henri Bergson No access
      3. 3. Conversion to the Catholic Faith: Léon Bloy No access
      4. 4. The Socialist and Nationalist: Charles Péguy No access
      5. 5. To the Right: Maurras and Action Française No access
      6. 6. To the Left: Emmanuel Mounier and Personalism No access
      7. 7. The Political Philosopher and Diplomat: The Later Maritain No access
      8. Conclusion No access
        1. 1.1. Individuality No access
          1. The extrinsic No access
          2. The intrinsic No access
        3. 1.3. A Precarious Unity No access
        1. Communion in virtue of dignity No access
            1. 2.1.1. Relationship to Society as an Individual No access
            2. 2.1.2. Relationship to Society as a Person No access
            3. 2.1.3. The Dialectical Tension No access
              1. a. Redistribution No access
              2. b. Intrinsic Morality No access
              3. c. Authority No access
          2. 2.2. A Global Governance for the Global Common Good No access
          3. 2.3. Democracy No access
      3. 3. The Knowing Being No access
      4. In lieu of a Conclusion: Towards a Personalist Political Theory No access
        1. 1.1. Anti-modernism of the Church No access
        2. 1.2. Anti-Thomism of the Modernity No access
          1. 1.3.1. The Historical Oddity No access
          2. 1.3.2. The Philosophical Curiosity No access
        1. 2.1. The Ontological Element of Natural Law No access
        2. 2.2. The Gnoseological Element of Natural Law No access
        1. 3.1. The Pre-Political Status of Human Rights No access
          1. 3.2.1. Natural Law No access
          2. 3.2.2. The Law of Nations No access
          3. 3.2.3. Positive Law No access
          1. 3.3.1. The Rights of the Human Person No access
          2. 3.3.2. The Rights of the Civic Person No access
          3. 3.3.3. The Rights of the Working Person No access
          1. 3.4.1. Possession and Exercise of Human Rights No access
          2. 3.4.2. Obligations No access
          3. 3.4.3. Trade-offs and Dynamic Unity No access
      4. Conclusion No access
        1. 1.1. Practical No access
        2. 1.2. Secular and Plural No access
        3. 1.3. Criticisms No access
        1. 2.1. Human Dignity in Evolution No access
        2. 2.2. History in Evolution No access
        3. 2.3. Human Knowledge in Evolution No access
        4. 2.4. Human Rights in Evolution No access
        1. 3.1. Maritain’s Reclaiming of the Person No access
        2. 3.2. The Notion of Subjective Rights No access
        3. 3.3. The ‘Deification’ of the Human Being No access
        4. 3.4. Democracy – Collective Autonomy No access
        5. 3.5. Criticisms No access
          1. 4.1.1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights No access
          2. 4.1.2. Influences in the Politics No access
          1. 4.2.1. Dignitatis Humanae: The Affirmation of the Person No access
          2. 4.2.2. Gaudium et Spes: The Affirmation of the Secular No access
      5. Conclusion No access
      1. 1. Spiritualism No access
        1. 2.1. Early Criticism of Capitalism No access
        2. 2.2. A Proponent of Liberalism: The American Spirit No access
        3. 2.3. Liberal Politics and Liberal Human Rights No access
        4. 2.4. A Moral Politics and an Amoral Economics No access
      3. Conclusion No access
    1. 1. The Legacy of Scholastic Economics and Sen’s Rediscovery of the Tradition of Political Economy No access
    2. 2. From Integral Humanism to Integral Development No access
        1. 1.1. The Great Famine of Bengal: The Question of Welfare No access
        2. 1.2. The Partition of India: The Question of Freedom No access
        1. 2.1. The Fact of Injustices and the Task of Bettering the World: A Direct Interest in Welfare No access
        2. 2.2. A Comparative Approach to Justice: Attention on Liberty No access
      3. Conclusion No access
        1. 1.1. The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal and the Possibility of Liberty No access
        2. 1.2. Impossibility Theorems and the Possibility of Welfare Economics No access
        3. Conclusion No access
          1. 2.1.1. Rationality as Consistency: The Internal Correspondence No access
          2. 2.1.2. Self-interest and Rational Behaviour: The External Correspondence No access
        2. 2.2. Human Beings between Egoism and Altruism No access
        3. 2.3. Meta-ranking as an Apparatus to Overcome the Rationality-Morality Dichotomy No access
        4. Conclusion No access
          1. 3.1.1. Welfarism No access
          2. 3.1.2. Sum-ranking No access
          3. 3.1.3. Consequentialism No access
          1. 3.2.1. Nozick and the Complete Priority of Liberty No access
            1. a. Overwhelming Precedence of Personal Liberties No access
            2. b. Conversion Problems No access
        3. 3.3. Sen’s Alternative Metric of Capability No access
      4. Conclusion No access
          1. 1.1.1. Beyond the Legislative Route No access
            1. a. Not all rights can be legislated No access
            2. b. Law cannot be a guide to moral obligations No access
            3. c. Universality of human rights No access
            4. d. Existence of law does not guarantee the realization of human rights No access
          3. 1.1.3. Interactive and Interrelated Means of Enhancing Human Rights No access
          1. 1.2.1. Human Rights: From Minimal Liberty to Real Opportunities No access
          2. 1.2.2. Process and Opportunity Freedom No access
          3. 1.2.3. A Multidimensional Notion of Freedom No access
          4. 1.2.4. The Threshold Conditions: Not all Freedoms Are Human Rights No access
        3. Conclusion No access
        1. 2.1. Universality Based on Our Shared Humanity No access
        2. 2.2. Viability Based on Survivability in Reasoned Discussion No access
        3. Conclusion No access
        1. 3.1. Scepticism about the Obligations Arising from Welfare Rights No access
        2. 3.2. Sen’s Formulation of Perfect and Imperfect Obligations No access
        3. 3.3. Obligation of Effective Power No access
        4. Conclusion No access
        1. 4.1. Goal Rights System: A Synthesis of Deontology and Consequentialism No access
          1. 4.2.1. Relaxation 1: Welfarist Instrumentalism No access
            1. a. The intrinsic value of rights No access
            2. b. Agent-weighted approach No access
          3. 4.2.3. Relaxation 2: Constraint-based Deontology No access
          4. 4.2.4. Affirmation 2: Instrumental and Interdependent Sensitivity of Consequentialism No access
        3. Conclusion No access
          1. 5.1.1. Institutionalization Critique No access
          2. 5.1.2. Feasibility Critique No access
          3. 5.1.3. Metarights No access
          1. 5.2.1. Political Freedom a Luxury for the Poor and Foreign to Culture? No access
          2. 5.2.2. The Inevitability of the Political No access
            1. a. Intrinsic No access
            2. b. Instrumental No access
            3. c. Constructive No access
      6. Conclusion No access
      1. 1. A Paradigm Shift in the Conceptualization of Development and Human Rights No access
      2. 2. The Integration of Human Development and Human Rights No access
            1. Human rights are individual rights No access
            2. Justifiability No access
            3. Coherence critique No access
          2. 3.1.2. RtD as a Human Right No access
          3. 3.1.3. RtD as a Right to Process of Development No access
          1. 3.2.1. The Objective of Development: What Is Achieved? No access
            1. Planned process focusing on the worst-off No access
            2. Interrelatedness of Ends and Means No access
        3. Conclusion No access
          1. The notion of duties to the fore No access
          2. How development is brought about – Process justice No access
          3. Enriching the assessments of social progress No access
          1. Concreteness to human rights analysis No access
          2. Assessment of the policies No access
          3. Creating an enabling social environment for the fulfilment of human rights No access
          4. The dynamism of the notion of development No access
      5. Conclusion No access
      1. 1. The Overestimation of animal rationale No access
      2. 2. The Insufficient Treatment of Structural Causes of Injustices No access
      3. 3. The Insufficient Treatment of Group Rights No access
      4. 4. The Insufficient Treatment of Ecological Issues No access
      5. 5. The Absolutization of Political Freedom No access
      6. 6. The Risks of Total Non-Essentialism No access
      7. Conclusion No access
        1. 1.1. Maritain and Aquinas No access
        2. 1.2. Sen and Smith No access
        1. Rationality No access
        2. Humanistic or theological? No access
        3. Conclusion No access
        1. 3.1. Maritain No access
          1. Conclusion No access
          1. Maritain’s endorsement of a practical agreement No access
          2. Sen’s comparative justice No access
          3. Conclusion No access
        2. 4.2. The Possibility of Praxis No access
      1. 1. Human Rights as Ethical Claims No access
      2. 2. The Universality of Human Rights No access
      3. 3. The Indivisibility of Human Rights No access
      4. Conclusion No access
      1. 1.1. Confidence in the Human Moral Agents No access
      2. 1.2. Relevance of a Discursive Process No access
      1. 2.1. A Sense of Injustice as the Starting Point of Social Ethics No access
      2. 2.2. A Realization-focused Framework No access
    3. Conclusion No access
      1. Jacques Maritain No access
      2. Amartya Sen No access
    2. Secondary Literature No access

Bibliography (502)

  1. Primary Sources Open Google Scholar
  2. Jacques Maritain Open Google Scholar
  3. Maritain, Jacques (1913/1955): Bergsonian Philosophy and Thomism, Andison, Mabelle L. and Andison, Gordon J. (trans.), New York: Philosophical Library. Open Google Scholar
  4. Maritain, Jacques (1927/1956): “The Primacy of the Spiritual”, in Evans, Joseph W. and Ward, Leo R. (eds.), The Social and Political Philosophy of Jacques Maritain: Selected Readings, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 168–175. Open Google Scholar
  5. Maritain, Jacques (1933/2012): “Freedom in the Modern World”, O’Sullivan, Richard K. C. (trans.), in Bird, Otto A. (ed.), Collected Works of Maritain, Vol. 11, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1–115. Open Google Scholar
  6. Maritain, Jacques (1935/2012): “A Letter on Independence”, in Bird, Otto (trans. & ed.), Collected Works of Maritain, Vol. 11, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 119–139. Open Google Scholar
  7. Maritain, Jacques (1936/2012): “Integral Humanism”, Evans, Joseph W. (trans.), in Bird, Otto (ed.), Collected Works of Maritain, Vol. 11, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 141–345. Open Google Scholar
  8. Maritain, Jacques (1939/1945): A Preface to Metaphysics: Seven Lectures on Being, London: Sheen & Ward. Open Google Scholar
  9. Maritain, Jacques (1939): “The Catholic Church and Social Progress”, Foreign Affairs, 17(4), 670–685. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20028954
  10. Maritain, Jacques (1940/2011): Scholasticism and Politics, Adler, Mortimer Jerome (trans.), Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund. Open Google Scholar
  11. Maritain, Jacques (1941): “The Achievement of Co-operation among Men of Different Creeds”, The Journal of Religion, 21(4), 364–372. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/482803
  12. Maritain, Jacques (1942): “The End of Machiavellianism”, The Review of Politics, 4(1), 1–33. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500003235
  13. Maritain, Jacques (1942/2011): The Rights of Man and the Natural Law, Anson, Doris C. (trans.), New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Open Google Scholar
  14. Maritain, Jacques (1943/2011): Christianity and Democracy, Anson, Doris C. (trans.), San Francisco: Ignatius Press. Open Google Scholar
  15. Maritain, Jacques (1944): Redeeming the Time, London: Geoffrey Bles, The Centenary Press. Open Google Scholar
  16. Maritain, Jacques (1944): The Twilight of Civilization, Hardy, Lionel (trans.), New York: Sheed and Ward. Open Google Scholar
  17. Maritain, Jacques (1947/2009): The Person and the Common Good, Fitzgerald, John J. (trans.), Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Open Google Scholar
  18. Maritain, Jacques (1947): “Communication with regard to the Draft World Declaration on the Rights of Man”, UNESCO Document, Catalogue Number: 124341, Document code: Phil./5/1947. Web, 22/01/2015, <http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001243/124341eb.pdf>. Open Google Scholar
  19. Maritain, Jacques (1948/1957): Existence and the Existent, Galantiere, Lewis and Phelan, Gerald B. (trans.), New York: Image Books. Open Google Scholar
  20. Maritain, Jacques (1949): “Introduction”, in UNESCO (ed.), Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations: A Symposium edited by UNESCO with an Introduction by Jacques Maritain, London and New York: Allan Wingate, 9–17. Open Google Scholar
  21. Maritain, Jacques (1949): “On the Philosophy of Human Rights”, in UNESCO (ed.), Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations: A Symposium edited by UNESCO with an Introduction by Jacques Maritain, London and New York: Allan Wingate, 72–77. Open Google Scholar
  22. Maritain, Jacques (1949): “Science and Ontology”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 5(6/7), 199–200. Open Google Scholar
  23. Maritain, Jacques (1951): “On Knowledge through Connaturality”, The Review of Metaphysics: A Philosophical Quarterly, 4(16), 473–481. Open Google Scholar
  24. Maritain, Jacques (1951/1998): Man and the State, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  25. Maritain, Jacques (1952): The Range of Reason, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Open Google Scholar
  26. Maritain, Jacques (1959): On the Philosophy of History, Evans, Joseph W. (ed.), London: Geoffrey Bles. Open Google Scholar
  27. Maritain, Jacques (1958/1964): Reflections on America, New York: Image Books. Open Google Scholar
  28. Maritain, Jacques (1968/2011): The Peasant of the Garonne: An Old Layman Questions Himself about the Present Time, Cuddihy, Michael and Hughes, Elizabeth (trans.), Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  29. Maritain, Jacques (2001): Natural Law: Reflections on Theory and Practice, Sweet, William (ed.), South Bend, Ind.: St. Augustine’s Press. Open Google Scholar
  30. Amartya Sen Open Google Scholar
  31. Sen, Amartya (1967): “The Nature and Classes of Prescriptive Judgements”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 17(66), 46–62. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2218365
  32. Sen, Amartya (1970): Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco. Open Google Scholar
  33. Sen, Amartya (1970): “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal”, Journal of Political Economy, 78(1), 152–157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/259614
  34. Sen, Amartya (1972): “Choice, Orderings and Morality”, in Sen, Amartya (1982/2008): Choice, Welfare and Measurement, New Delhi [among others]: Oxford University Press, 74–83. Open Google Scholar
  35. Sen, Amartya (1973): “Behaviour and the Concept of Preference”, Economica, 40(159), 241–259. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2552796
  36. Sen, Amartya (1973/2010): On Economic Inequality, [expanded edition of the 1973 book, annexed by James E. Foster], New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198281935.003.0004
  37. Sen, Amartya (1976): “Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement”, Econometrica, 44(2), 219–231. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1912718
  38. Sen, Amartya (1977): “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344. Open Google Scholar
  39. Sen, Amartya (1978): “On the Labour Theory of Value: Some Methodological Issues”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2(2), 175–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035384
  40. Sen, Amartya (1979): “Informational Analysis of Moral Principles”, in Harrison, Ross (ed.) (1979): Rational Action: Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115–132. Open Google Scholar
  41. Sen, Amartya (1979): “Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What’s Wrong with Welfare Economics? The Economic Journal, 89(355), 537–558. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2231867
  42. Sen, Amartya (1979): “Utilitarianism and Welfarism”, Journal of Philosophy, 7(9), 463–489. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2025934
  43. Sen, Amartya (1980): “Description as Choice”, Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 32(3), 353–369. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041484
  44. Sen, Amartya (1980): “Equality of what?”, in McMurrin, Sterling M. (ed.), Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. I, Cambridge [among others]: Cambridge University Press, 195–220. Open Google Scholar
  45. Sen, Amartya (1981): “A Positive Concept of Negative Freedom”, in Morscher, Edgar and Stranzinger, Rudolf (eds.), Ethics: Foundations, Problems and Applications: Proceedings of the Fifth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 43–56. Open Google Scholar
  46. Sen, Amartya (1981): “Plural Utility”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 81(1), 193–215. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/81.1.193
  47. Sen, Amartya (1981): Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, New Delhi: Oxford India Paperbacks, Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  48. Sen, Amartya (1982/2008): Choice, Welfare and Measurement, New Delhi [among others]: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  49. Sen, Amartya (1982): “Rights and Agency”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11(1), 3–39. Open Google Scholar
  50. Sen, Amartya (1982): “The Right not to Be Hungry”, in Floistad, G. (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey, Vol. 2, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 343–360. Open Google Scholar
  51. Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (1982/1990): Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611964.002
  52. Sen, Amartya (1983): “Development: Which Way Now?”, The Economic Journal, 93(372), 745–762. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2232744
  53. Sen, Amartya (1983): “Evaluator Relativity and Consequential Evaluation”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(2), 113–132. Open Google Scholar
  54. Sen, Amartya and Sengupta, S. (1983): “Malnutrition of Rural Indian Children and the Sex Bias”, Economic & Political Weekly, 18(19-20-21), 1831–1842. Open Google Scholar
  55. Sen, Amartya (1984/2010): Resources, Values and Development, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  56. Sen, Amartya (1984): “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984”, Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221. Open Google Scholar
  57. Sen, Amartya (1985): “Goals, Commitment, and Identity”, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1(2), 341–355. Open Google Scholar
  58. Sen, Amartya (1985): “Rationality and Uncertainty”, Theory and Decision, 18(2), 109–127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF00134068
  59. Sen, Amartya (1985): “Rights as Goals: Austin Lecture to the U.K. Association for Legal and Social Philosophy”, in Guest, Stephan and Milne, Alan (eds.), Equality and Discrimination: Essays in Freedom and Justice, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 11–25. Open Google Scholar
  60. Sen, Amartya (1986): “Prediction and Economic Theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 407(1832), 3–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1986.0080
  61. Sen, Amartya (1986): Welfare Economics and the Real World: Acceptance Paper for the Frank Seidman Distinguished Award in Political Economy, Memphis, TN: P. K. Seidman Foundation. Open Google Scholar
  62. Sen, Amartya (1987): Food and Freedom: Sir John Crawford Memorial Lecture, Washington, D.C. Web, 14/06/2015, <http://wphna.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/1985-Sen-Food-and-freedom.pdf>. Open Google Scholar
  63. Sen, Amartya (1987): Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content, WIDER Working Papers 25, Alfred Marshall Lecture at the annual meeting of the European Economic Association Copenhagen, World Institute for Development Economics Research of The United Nations University. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570742.002
  64. Sen, Amartya (1987): On Ethics and Economics, Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  65. Sen, Amartya (1987): The Standard of Living, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  66. Sen, Amartya (1988): “Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content”, European Economic Review, 32(3/2), 269–294. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(88)90173-0
  67. Sen, Amartya (1990): “Development as Capability Expansion”, in Griffin, Keith and Knight, J. (eds.), Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s, London: Macmillan, 41–58. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21136-4_3
  68. Sen, Amartya (1990): “Justice: Means versus Freedom”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(2), 111–121. Open Google Scholar
  69. Sen, Amartya (1990): “More than Hundred Million Women Are Missing”, New York Review of Books, 37(20), 61–66. Open Google Scholar
  70. Sen, Amartya (1992): Inequality Reexamined, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  71. Sen, Amartya (1992): “Minimal Liberty”, Economica, 59(234), 139–159. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2554743
  72. Sen, Amartya (1992): “Missing Women: Social Inequality Outweighs Women’s Survival Advantage in Asia and North Africa”, British Medical Journal, 304(6827), 587–588. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6827.587
  73. Sen, Amartya (1993): “Capability and Well-being”, in Nussbaum, Martha Craven and Sen, Amartya, The Quality of Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 30–53 (WIDER Studies in Development Economics). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0003
  74. Sen, Amartya (1993): “Internal Consistency of Choice”, Econometrica, 61(3), 495–521. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2951715
  75. Sen, Amartya (1993): “Positional Objectivity”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 22(2), 126–145. Open Google Scholar
  76. Sen, Amartya (1995): “Environmental Evaluation and Social Choice: Contingent Valuation and the Market Analogy”, Japanese Economic Review, 46(1), 23–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.1995.tb00003.x
  77. Sen, Amartya (1995): “Moral Codes and Economic Success”, in Brittan, Samuel and Hamlin, Alan (eds.): Market Capitalism and Moral Values: Proceedings of Section F (Economics) of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Keele, 1993, Aldershot, Hants, England and Brookfield, Vt., USA: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  78. Sen, Amartya (1995): “Rationality and Social Choice”, The American Economic Review, 85(1), 1–24. Open Google Scholar
  79. Sen, Amartya (1995): “Wrongs and Rights in Development”, Prospect Magazine, October. Web, 25/06/2015, <http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/features/wrongsandrightsindevelopment>. Open Google Scholar
  80. Sen, Amartya (1996): “Foreword”, in Dutta, K. and Robinson, A. (eds.), Selected Letters of Rabindranath Tagore, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  81. Sen, Amartya (1996): “Rights: Formulation and Consequences”, Analyse & Kritik, 18(1), 153–170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-1996-0111
  82. Sen, Amartya (1996): “Welfare Economics and Two Approaches to Rights”, in Pardo, José Casas and Schneider, Friedrich (eds.), Current Issues in Public Choice, Cheltenham and Brookfield: Edward Elgar, 21–39. Open Google Scholar
  83. Sen, Amartya (1997): “From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality”, Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 384–401. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1060857
  84. Sen, Amartya (1997): “Human Rights and Asian Values”, The New Republic, July 14–July 21, 33–40. Open Google Scholar
  85. Sen, Amartya (1997): Human Rights and Asian Values: Sixteenth Morgenthau Memorial Lecture on Ethics & Foreign Policy, New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs. Open Google Scholar
  86. Sen, Amartya (1997): “Maximization and the Act of Choice”, Econometrica, 65(4), 745–779. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2171939
  87. Sen, Amartya (1997): “Tagore and His India”, The New York Review of Books, 44(11). Web, 21/10/2015, <https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1913/tagore-article.html >. Open Google Scholar
  88. Sen, Amartya (1998): “Amartya Sen – Biographical”, Nobelprize.org, The Nobel Foundation 1998. Web, 14/02/2015, <http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1998/sen-bio.html>. Open Google Scholar
  89. Sen, Amartya (1999): Commodities and Capabilities, Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  90. Sen, Amartya (1999): “Democracy as a Universal Value”, Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3–17. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/jod.1999.0055
  91. Sen, Amartya (1999): Development as Freedom, New Delhi and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  92. Sen, Amartya (1999): “Global Justice beyond International Equity”, in Kaul, Inge et al. (eds.), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 116–125. Open Google Scholar
  93. Sen, Amartya (1999): “Human Rights and Economic Achievements”, in Bauer, Joanne R. and Bell, Daniel A. (eds.), The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, New York: Cambridge University Press, 88–99. Open Google Scholar
  94. Sen, Amartya (1999): Reason before Identity, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  95. Sen, Amartya (1999/2010): Resources, Values and Development, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  96. Sen, Amartya (1999): “The Possibility of Social Choice”, The American Economic Review, 89(3), 349–378. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.349
  97. Sen, Amartya (2000): “Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason”, Journal of Philosophy, 97(9), 447–502. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2678488
  98. Sen, Amartya (2000): “Human Rights and Human Development”, in The United Nations Development Programme (ed.), Human Development Report 2000: Human Rights and Human Development, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19–26. Open Google Scholar
  99. Sen, Amartya (2000): Social Exclusion: Concept, Application, and Scrutiny: Asian Development Bank Working Paper No. 1, Manila, Philippines: Office of Environment and Social Development Asian Development Bank. Open Google Scholar
  100. Sen, Amartya (2000): “Work and Rights”, International Labour Review, 139(2), 119–128. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2000.tb00406.x
  101. Sen, Amartya (2002/2011): Rationality and Freedom, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  102. Sen, Amartya (2002): “The Right to One’s Identity”, Frontline, 19(1), 5–18. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/03064220208537059
  103. Sen, Amartya (2003): “Democracy and Its Global Roots: Why Democratization Is not the Same as Westernization”, The New Republic, October 6, 2003, 28–35. Open Google Scholar
  104. Sen, Amartya (2003): “Development as Capability Expansion”, in Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and Shiva Kumar, A. K. (eds.), Readings in Human Development, New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, 3–16. Open Google Scholar
  105. Sen, Amartya (2003): “The Importance of Basic Education”, Guardian, October 28, 2003. Web, 22/03/2016, <http://www.theguardian.com/education/2003/oct/28/schools.uk4>. Open Google Scholar
  106. Sen, Amartya (2004): “Capabilities, Lists and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation”, Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000315163
  107. Sen, Amartya (2004): “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00017.x
  108. Sen, Amartya (2004): “How Does Culture Matter”, in Rao, Vijayendra and Walton, Michael (eds.), Culture and Public Action, California: Stanford University Press, 37–58 (Stanford Social Sciences). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1596/0-8047-4787-3
  109. Sen, Amartya (2004): “Why We Should Preserve the Spotted Owl”, London Review of Books, 26(3), 10–11. Open Google Scholar
  110. Sen, Amartya (2005): “Human Rights and Capabilities”, Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120491
  111. Sen, Amartya (2005): The Argumentative Indian, London: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  112. Sen, Amartya (2005): “Why Exactly Is Commitment Important for Rationality?”, Economics and Philosophy, 21(1), 5–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0266267104000355
  113. Sen, Amartya (2006): “Human Rights and the Limits of the Law”, Cardozo Law Review, 27(6), 2913–2927. Open Google Scholar
  114. Sen, Amartya (2006): Identity and Violence, London and New Delhi: Allen Lane & Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  115. Sen, Amartya (2006): “What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice?”, The Journal of Philosophy, 103(5), 215–238. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/jphil2006103517
  116. Sen, Amartya (2007): “Children and Human Rights”, Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 1–11. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0973703020070201
  117. Sen, Amartya (2008): “Forward: Understanding the Challenge of AIDS”, in Akhavi, Negar (ed.), AIDS Sutra: Untold Stories from India, New York: Anchor Books, 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  118. Sen, Amartya (2008): “The Idea of Justice”, Journal of Human Development, 9(3), 331–342. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14649880802236540
  119. Sen, Amartya (2009): “Capitalism Beyond the Crisis”, The New York Review of Books, 56(5). Web, 07/12/2014, <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2009/03/26/capitalism-beyond-the-crisis/>. Open Google Scholar
  120. Sen, Amartya (2009): “Introduction”, in Hanley, Ryan Patrick (ed.), Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments, 250th Edition, New York [among others]: Penguin Books, vii–xxvi. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581212.002
  121. Sen, Amartya (2009): “Response”, in Gotō, Reiko and Dumouchel, Paul (eds.), Against Injustice: The New Economics of Amartya Sen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 297–309. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657443.014
  122. Sen, Amartya (2009): The Idea of Justice, London: Penguin Books. Open Google Scholar
  123. Sen, Amartya (2009): “The Power of a Declaration”, The New Republic, February 4, 2009. Web, 11/04/2014, <https://newrepublic.com/article/62158/the-power-declaration>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511657443.014
  124. Sen, Amartya (2011): “Poetry and Reason”, New Republic, June 9, 2011. Web, 22/11/2015, <http://www.newrepublic.com/article/books/magazine/89649/rabindranath-tagore>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0014.12
  125. Sen, Amartya (2011): “Quality of Life: India vs. China”, The New York Review of Books, 58(8). Web, 16/01/2016, <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2011/05/12/quality-life-india-vs-china/>. Open Google Scholar
  126. Sen, Amartya (2011): “The Boundaries of Justice”, New Republic, December 14, 2011. Web, 27/09/2014, <https://newrepublic.com/article/98552/hume-rawls-boundaries-justice>. Open Google Scholar
  127. Sen, Amartya (2011): “The Global Status of Human Rights: Thirteenth Annual Grotius Lecture Series”, American University International Law Review, 27(1), 1–15. Open Google Scholar
  128. Sen, Amartya (2011): “Violence and Civil Society”, in Sen, Amartya (ed.), Peace and Democratic Society, Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, Commonwealth Secretariat, 1–25. Open Google Scholar
  129. Sen, Amartya (2012): “A Reply to Robeyns, Peter and Davis”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(2), 173–176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.683595
  130. Sen, Amartya (2012): “Forward”, in Elson, Diane; Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and Vizard, Polly (eds.), Human Rights and the Capabilities Approach: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue, London and New York: Routledge, xi–xviii. Open Google Scholar
  131. Sen, Amartya (2012): “The Crisis of European Democracy”, The New York Times, May 22. Web 27/06/2015, < http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/opinion/the-crisis-of-european-democracy.html?mcubz=0>. Open Google Scholar
  132. Sen, Amartya (2012): “Values and Justice”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(2), 101–108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.683601
  133. Sen, Amartya (2013): “The Ends and Means of Sustainability”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747492
  134. Sen, Amartya (2014): “Global Warming Is Just One of Many Environmental Threats that Demand Our Attention”, New Republic, August 23, 2014. Web, 14/02/2015, <https://newrepublic.com/article/118969/environmentalists-obsess-about-global-warming-ignore-poor-countries>. Open Google Scholar
  135. Sen, Amartya (2015): The Country of First Boys: And Other Essays, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  136. Sen, Amartya (2015): “The Idea of Justice: A Response”, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(1), 77–88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0191453714553501
  137. Sen, Amartya (2016): “The Criticality of the Right to Dissent”, The Hindu, February 14, 2016. Web, 21/03/2014, <http://www.thehindu.com/news/resources/the-criticality-of-the-right-to-dissent-full-text-of-amartya-sen-lecture/article8236773.ece>. Open Google Scholar
  138. Sen, Amartya (2017): Collective Choice and Social Welfare: Expanded Edition, U.K.: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  139. Anand, Sudhir and Sen, Amartya (2000): “Human Development and Economic Sustainability”, World Development, 28(12), 2029–2049. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00071-1
  140. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (1989): Hunger and Public Action, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  141. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (eds.) (1991): The Political Economy of Hunger, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198286370.003.0001
  142. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (1995): India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, Oxford and Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  143. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (1995): The Political Economy of Hunger: Selected Essays, London: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar
  144. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (eds.) (1997): Indian Development: Selected Regional Perspectives. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  145. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (2002): India: Development and Participation, New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257492.003.0001
  146. Drèze, Jean and Sen, Amartya (2013): An Uncertain Glory: India and Its Contradictions, London: Allen Lane. Open Google Scholar
  147. Maskin, Eric and Sen, Amartya (2017): “The Rules of the Game: A New Electoral System”, The New York Review of Books, 64(1). Web, 20/02/2017, <http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2017/01/19/rules-of-the-game-new-electoral-system/>. Open Google Scholar
  148. Rothschild, Emma and Sen, Amartya (2006): “Adam Smith’s Economics”, in Haakonssen, Knud (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 319–365. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521770599.013
  149. Stiglitz, Joseph E.; Sen, Amartya and Fitoussi, Jean-Paul (2010): Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn’t Add Up: The Report, New York: New Press. Open Google Scholar
  150. Secondary Literature Open Google Scholar
  151. Acevedo, Alma (2012): “Personalist Business Ethics and Humanistic Management: Insights from Jacques Maritain”, Journal of Business Ethics, 105(2), 197–219. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0959-x
  152. Agarwal, Bina; Humphries, Jane and Robeyns, Ingrid (2003): “Continuing the Conversation: Amartya Sen Talks with Bina Agarwal, Jane Humphries, and Ingrid Robeyns”, Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 319–332. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1354570032000089788
  153. Ake, Claude (1994): “The African Context of Human Rights”, Africa Today, 34 (1/2), 5–12. Open Google Scholar
  154. Alexander, John M. (2004): “Capabilities, Human Rights and Moral Pluralism”, The International Journal of Human Rights, 8(4), 451–469. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1364298042000283585
  155. Alkire, Sabina (2009): “Development: ‘A Misconceived Theory Can Kill’”, in Morris, Christopher W. (ed.), Amartya Sen, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 191–219. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511.010
  156. Alston, Philip (1984): “Conjuring up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control”, The American Journal of International Law, 78(3), 607–621. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2202599
  157. Alston, Philip (2015): “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights”, United Nations General Assembly, Seventieth session, August 4, A/70/274. Web, 18/02/2016, <http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/274>. Open Google Scholar
  158. Amato, Joseph (1975): Mounier and Maritain: A French Catholic Understanding of the Modern World, University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press. Open Google Scholar
  159. Anderson, Elizabeth (2001): “Unstrapping the Straitjacket of ‘Preference’: A Comment on Amartya Sen’s Contributions to Philosophy and Economics”, Economics and Philosophy, (17), 21–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0266267101000128
  160. Andries, Edward M. (1999): “On the German Constitution’s Fiftieth Anniversary: Jacques Maritain and the 1949 Basic Law (Grundgesetz)”, Emory International Law Review, 13(1), 1–75. Open Google Scholar
  161. Appiah, Kwame Anthony (2009): “Sen’s Identities”, in Basu, Kaushik and Kanbur, Ravi (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, Vol. I, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 475–488. Open Google Scholar
  162. Aquinas, Thomas (1265–1274/1947): Summa Theologica, Fathers of the English Dominican Province (trans.), Benziger Bros., Web, 19/03/2016, <http://dhspriory.org/thomas/summa/>. Open Google Scholar
  163. Arendt, Hannah (1971): “Thinking and Moral Considerations: A Lecture”, Social Research, 38(3), 417–446. Open Google Scholar
  164. Arnal, Oscar L. (1985): Ambivalent Alliance: The Catholic Church and the Action Française, 1899–1939, Pittsburgh and Chicago: University of Pittsburgh Press. Open Google Scholar
  165. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1963): Social Choice and Individual Values, New Haven: Yale University Press. Open Google Scholar
  166. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1999): “Amartya K. Sen’s Contributions to the Study of Social Welfare”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2), 163–172. Open Google Scholar
  167. Ashworth, Andrew and Steiner, Eva (1990): “Criminal Omissions and Public Duties: The French Experience”, Legal Studies, 10(2), 153–164. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1990.tb00597.x
  168. Atkinson, Anthony B. (1999): “The Contributions of Amartya Sen to Welfare Economics”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2), 173–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/1467-9442.00151
  169. Bardhan, Pranab (2006): “The Arguing Indian”, California Magazine, July–August, Cal Alumni Association UC Berkeley. Web, 16/06/2014, <http://alumni.berkeley.edu/california-magazine/july-august-2006-indo-chic/arguing-indian>. Open Google Scholar
  170. Barsamian, David (2011): “Interview with Amartya Sen”, The Progressive, September 29, 2011. Web, 20/05/2015, <http://www.progressive.org/amartya_sen_interview.html>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0014.12
  171. Basu, Kaushik (2011): Beyond the Invisible Hand: Groundwork for a New Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  172. Beitz, Charles (2005): “Cosmopolitan and Global Justice”, The Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2), 11–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3312-0
  173. Bergson, Herni (1911/2007): Creative Evolution, Mitchell, Arthur (trans.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.21922
  174. Berlin, Isaiah (1969): Four Essays on Liberty, London: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  175. Bethell, Ruth (1945): “Léon Bloy: The Church and the Bourgeois”, New Blackfriars, 26(302), 168–174. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.1945.tb00365.x
  176. Bloy, Léon (1987): Schrei aus der Tiefe, von Balthasar, Hans Urs (trans.), Einsiedeln: Johannes. Open Google Scholar
  177. Böhler, Thomas (2004): Der Fähigkeiten-Ansatz von Amartya Sen und die „Bevorzugte Option für die Armen“ in der Befreiungstheologie: Zwei Ansätze auf dem Weg zur ethischen Begründung von Armutsforschung und Armutsreduktion, University of Salzburg, Poverty Research Group. Open Google Scholar
  178. Brennan, Patrick McKinley (2007): “Jacques Maritain (1882–1973): Commentary”, in Witte, John and Alexander, Frank S. (eds.), The Teachings of Modern Roman Catholicism on Law, Politics, and Human Nature, New York: Columbia University Press, 106–147. Open Google Scholar
  179. Bromme, John (2009): “Why Economics Needs Ethical Theory”, in Basu, Kaushik and Kanbur, Ravi (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, Vol. I, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 7–14. Open Google Scholar
  180. Buchanan, Allen (1996): “Perfecting Imperfect Duties: Collective Action to Create Moral Obligation”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(1), 27–42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/3857239
  181. Burrell, David B. (2004): “Thomas Aquinas and Islam”, Modern Theology, 20(1), 71–89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0025.2004.00243.x
  182. Busi, Frederick (1968): “Maritain in Opposition: The Peasant of the Garonne by Jacques Maritain”, The Massachusetts Review, 9(3), 604. Open Google Scholar
  183. Butler, Judith (1990): Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  184. Cagin, Michel (2016): “Jacques Maritain und das zweite Vatikanische Konzil“, Communio, 1, 60–75. Open Google Scholar
  185. Cahill, Lisa Sowle (1980): “Toward a Christian Theory of Human Rights”, The Journal of Religious Ethics, (8)2, 277–301. Open Google Scholar
  186. Carroll, David (1995/1998): French Literary Fascism: Nationalism, Anti-Semitism, and the Ideology of Culture, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  187. Carter, Stephen G. (2008): “The ‘Historical Solution’ versus the ‘Philosophical Solution’”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 69(1), 93–115. Open Google Scholar
  188. Castro Sarria, Oscar de (1971): Die politische Lehre von Jacques Maritain und die Problematik einer christlichen Politik, University of Munich. Open Google Scholar
  189. Chakraborty, Achin (1998): “Amartya Sen and our World of Exaggerated Opposites”, Economic & Political Weekly, 33(51), 3241–3242. Open Google Scholar
  190. Chappell, Timothy (1999): “Response to John Haldane’s Thomism and the Future of Catholic Philosophy”, New Blackfriars, 80(938), 172–174. Open Google Scholar
  191. Christiansen, Drew (2005): “Commentary on Pacem in Terris”, in Himes, Kenneth R. (ed.), Modern Catholic Social Teaching: Commentaries and Interpretations, Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 217–243. Open Google Scholar
  192. Clague, Julie (2000): “‘A Dubious Idiom and Rhetoric’: How Problematic Is the Language of Human Rights in Catholic Social Thought”, in Boswell, Jonathan; McHugh, Francis P. and Verstraeten, Johan (eds.), Catholic Social Thought: Twilight or Renaissance? Leuven: University Press and Uitgeverij Peeters, 125–140. Open Google Scholar
  193. Clark, Meghan J. (2012): “Reasoned Agreement versus Practical Reasonableness: Grounding Human Rights in Maritain and Rawls”, The Heythrop Journal, 53(4), 637–648. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00557.x
  194. Clooney, Francis X. (2001): Hindu God, Christian God: How Reason Helps Break Down the Boundaries between Religions, New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  195. Clooney, Francis X. (2004): “Neither Here nor There: Crossing Boundaries, Becoming Insiders, Remaining Catholic”, in Cabezón, José-Ignacio and Davaney Greeve, Sheila (eds.), Identity and Politics of Identity in Scholarship in the Study of Religion, New York and London: Routledge, 99–111. Open Google Scholar
  196. Cochran, Clarke E. and Rourke, Thomas (1995): “Moving Beyond Ideology in Christian Economic Thought: Yves R. Simon and the Recent Debates”, in Hancock, Curtis L. and Simon, Anthony O. (eds.), Freedom, Virtue, and the Common Good, Mishawaka, Ind.: American Maritain Association, 307–331. Open Google Scholar
  197. Cohen, G. A. (1993): “Equality of What? On Welfare, Goods and Capabilities”, in Nussbaum, Martha Craven and Sen, Amartya (eds.), The Quality of Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–29 (WIDER Studies in Development Economics). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/0198287976.003.0002
  198. Coleman, John A. (1984): “Catholic Human Rights Theory: Four Challenges to an Intellectual Tradition”, Journal of Law and Religion, 2(2), 343–366. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1051095
  199. Cooper, John W. (1985): The Theology of Freedom: The Legacy of Jacques Maritain and Reinhold Niebuhr, Macon, GA: Mercer. Open Google Scholar
  200. Cooper, John W. (1988): “Natural Law and Economic Humanism”, in Knasas, John F. X. (ed.), Jacques Maritain: The Man and His Metaphysics, Mishawaka, Ind.: American Maritain Association, 147–157. Open Google Scholar
  201. Cooper, Richard N. (2000): “The Road from Serfdom: Amartya Sen Argues that Growth Is not Enough: Development as Freedom by Amartya Sen”, Foreign Affairs, 79(1), 163–167. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20049621
  202. Corbridge, Stuart (2002): “Development as Freedom: The Spaces of Amartya Sen”, Progress in Development Studies, 2(3), 183–217. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps037ra
  203. Cornwell, John (2008): Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII, New York and London [among others]: Penguin. Open Google Scholar
  204. Crane, Richard Francis (2009): “Jacques Maritain, the Mystery of Israel, and the Holocaust”, The Catholic Historical Review, 95(1), 25–56. Open Google Scholar
  205. Crocker, David A. (2008): Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  206. Crosson, Frederick J. (1983): “Maritain and Natural Rights”, The Review of Metaphysics, 36(4), 895–912. Open Google Scholar
  207. Cudd, Ann E. (2014): “Commitment as Motivation: Amartya Sen’s Theory of Agency and the Explanation of Behaviour”, Economics and Philosophy, 30(1), 35–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000030
  208. Curran, Charles E. (2002): Catholic Social Teaching, 1891–present: A Historical, Theological, and Ethical Analysis, Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press. Open Google Scholar
  209. Curran, Charles E. (ed.) (2003): Change in Official Catholic Moral Teaching, New York: Paulist Press. Open Google Scholar
  210. Curtis, Michael (1959): Three against the Third Republic: Sorel, Barrés, and Maurras, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  211. Dagum, Camilo (1981): “Jacques Maritain and Human Rights”, University of Ottawa Quarterly, 51(4), 663–668. Open Google Scholar
  212. Dalai Lama (2015): An Appeal by the Dalai Lama to the World: Ethics Are More Important than Religion, Alt, Franz (ed.), Salzburg: Benevento. Open Google Scholar
  213. Dallmayr, Fred R. (2002): “Asian Values and Global Human Rights”, Philosophy East and West, 52(2), 173–189. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/pew.2002.0025
  214. De Roover, Raymond (1955): “Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(2), 161–190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1882146
  215. Deneulin, Séverine and McGregor, J. Allister (2010): “The Capability Approach and the Politics of a Social Conception of Wellbeing”, European Journal of Social Theory, 13(4), 501–519. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1368431010382762
  216. Dennehy, Raymond (1987): “Maritain’s Intellectual Existentialism: An Introduction to his Metaphysics and Epistemology”, in Hudson, Deal W. and Mancini, Matthew J. (eds.), Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend, Macon: Mercer University Press, 201–233. Open Google Scholar
  217. Dennehy, Raymond (1988): “The Contemporaneity of Maritain’s Existence and the Existent”, in Knasas, John F. X. (ed.), Jacques Maritain: The Man and his Metaphysics, Mishawaka, Ind.: American Maritain Association, 267–271. Open Google Scholar
  218. Deweer, Dries (2013): “The Political Theory of Personalism: Maritain and Mounier on Personhood and Citizenship”, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 74(2), 108–126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2013.809869
  219. Dhongde, Shatakshee and Pattanaik, Prasanta K. (2009): “Preference, Choice, and Rationality: Amartya Sen’s Critique of the Theory of Rational Choice in Economics”, in Morris, Christopher W. (ed.), Amartya Sen, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 13–39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511.003
  220. Dierksmeier, Claus and Celano, Anthony (2012): “Thomas Aquinas on Justice as a Global Virtue in Business”, Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/beq201222225
  221. DiJoseph, John (1996): Jacques Maritain and the Moral Foundation of Democracy, Lanham, New York, etc.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  222. Doering, Bernard E. (1982): Jacques Maritain and the French Catholic Intellectuals, Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Open Google Scholar
  223. Doering, Bernard (1985): “The Economics of Jacques Maritain”, Review of Social Economy, 43(1), 64–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00346768500000021
  224. Doering, Bernhard E. (1987): “Jacques Maritain and His Two ‘Authentic Revolutionaries’”, in Kennedy, Leonard A. (ed.), Thomistic Papers III, Houston, Tex.: Center for Thomistic Studies, 91–116. Open Google Scholar
  225. Doering, Bernard (2005): “Jacques Maritain (1882–1973): A Beggar for Heaven on the Byways of the World”, Theology Today, 62(3), 306–316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/004057360506200302
  226. Doolan, Gregory (2001): “Maritain, St. Thomas Aquinas and the First Principles of Natural Law”, in Fuller, Timothy and Hittinger, John P. (eds.), Reassessing the Liberal State: Reading Maritain’s Man and the State, Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 127–139. Open Google Scholar
  227. Dougherty, Jude P. (2003): Jacques Maritain: An Intellectual Profile, Washington, D.C: Catholic University of America Press. Open Google Scholar
  228. Duncan, Bruce (2001): Crusade or Conspiracy? Catholics and the Anti-communist Struggle in Australia, Sydney, NSW: UNSW NSW Press. Open Google Scholar
  229. “Editorial” (1943), Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 5, 4. Open Google Scholar
  230. Eiffe, Franz F. (2010): “Amartya Sen Reading Adam Smith”, History of Economics Review, 51(1), 1–23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/18386318.2010.11682153
  231. Elliott, Michael A. (2007): “Human Rights and the Triumph of the Individual in World Culture”, Cultural Sociology, 1(3), 343–363. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1749975507082052
  232. Encyclopædia Britannica (2013): “Charles Péguy”. Web, 27/05/2014, <http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/448803/Charles-Peguy>. Open Google Scholar
  233. Essex Human Rights Review (2004): “The Right to Development: An Interview with Dr Arjun Sengupta”, 1(1), 93–97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13600810410001699948
  234. Evans, Joseph W. (1952): “Jacques Maritain’s Personalism”, Review of Politics, 14(2), 166–177. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500003107
  235. Evans, Joseph W. (1960): “Jacques Maritain and the Problem of Pluralism in Political Life”, The Review of Politics, 22(3), 307–323. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500000954
  236. Fay, Thomas A. (1991): “Maritain on Rights and Natural Law”, Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 55(3), 439–448. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/tho.1991.0009
  237. Fiorenza, Francis Schussler (1984): Foundational Theology: Jesus and the Church, New York: Crossroad. Open Google Scholar
  238. Fletcher, George P. (2001): “In Honour of Ius et Lex: Some Thoughts on Speaking About Law”, Lecture in honour of Leon Petrazycki delivered at the Inauguration of Ius et Lex Legal Magazine. Web, 24/05/2015, <http://www.iusetlex.pl/zalaczniki/wyklad_fletcher.pdf>. Open Google Scholar
  239. Francis, Pope (2013): Evangelii Gaudium. Web, 19/03/2016, <https://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_exhortations/documents/papa-francesco_esortazione-ap_20131124_evangelii-gaudium.html>. Open Google Scholar
  240. Francis, Pope (2013): “Interview”, America: The National Catholic Weekly, 209(8), 16–38. Open Google Scholar
  241. Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko (2009): “Human Rights and Human Development”, in Basu, Kaushik and Kanbur, Ravi (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Vol. II, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 76–99. Open Google Scholar
  242. Gaertner, Wulf (2008): “Human Rights and the Stage of Development”, HD Insights, HDR Networks, 22, November. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14649880802236607
  243. Gaertner, Wulf (2008): “Individual Rights versus Economic Growth”, Journal of Human Development, 9(3), 389–400. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/14649880802236607
  244. Gendreau, Bernard A. (1992): “The Role of Jacques Maritain and Emmanuel Mounier in the Creation of French Personalism”, The Personalist Forum, 8(1), 97–108. Open Google Scholar
  245. Ghazanfar, Shaikh M. (2000): “The Economic Thought of Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali and St. Thomas Aquinas: Some Comparative Parallels and Links”, History of Political Economy, 32(4), 857–888. Open Google Scholar
  246. Giovanola, Benedetta (2009): “Re-Thinking the Anthropological and Ethical Foundation of Economics and Business: Human Richness and Capabilities Enhancement”, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3), 431–444. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0126-9
  247. Glendon, Mary A. (1998): “Knowing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Notre Dame Law Review, 73(5), 1153–1190. Open Google Scholar
  248. Glendon, Mary Ann (1998): “Reflections on the UDHR”, First Things, 82, April, 23–27. Open Google Scholar
  249. Glendon, Mary Ann (1999): “Foundations of Human Rights: The Unfinished Business”, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 44(1), 1–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ajj/44.1.1
  250. Glendon, Mary Ann (2001): A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar
  251. Glover, Jonathan (1999): Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century, London: Jonathan Cape. Open Google Scholar
  252. Goulet, Denis (1971): The Cruel Choice: A New Concept in the Theory of Development, New York: Atheneum. Open Google Scholar
  253. Griffin, Leslie (2005): “Commentary on Dignitatis humanae”, in Himes, Kenneth R. (ed.), Modern Catholic Social Teaching: Commentaries and Interpretations, Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 244–265. Open Google Scholar
  254. Gurian, Waldemar (1943): “On Maritain’s Political Philosophy”, Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 5, 7–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/tho.1943.0002
  255. Gutiérrez, Gustavo (1970): “Notes for a Theology of Liberation”, Theological Studies, 31(2), 243–261. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/004056397003100201
  256. Gutiérrez, Gustavo (1973): A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics, and Salvation, Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books. Open Google Scholar
  257. Gutiérrez, Gustavo (1990): The Truth Shall Make You Free: Confrontations, Maryknoll, NY: Orbis. Open Google Scholar
  258. Ul Haq, Mahbub (1995): Reflections on Human Development, New York and Delhi: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23958-0_17
  259. Häring, Bernhard (1954): Das Gesetz Christi: Moraltheologie, dargestellt für Priester und Laien, Freiburg i. Br.: Erich Wewel. Open Google Scholar
  260. Häring, Bernhard (1979–1981): Frei in Christus: Moraltheologie für die Praxis des christlichen Lebens, 3 Volumes, Freiburg i. Br, Basel and Wien: Herder. Open Google Scholar
  261. Harrison, Ross (ed.): Rational Action: Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  262. Hart, H. L. A. (1955): “Are There Any Natural Rights?”, The Philosophical Review, 64(2), 175–191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2182586
  263. Hart, Herbert (1979): “Between Utility and Rights”, Columbia Law Review, 79(5), 828–846. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1121909
  264. Hartley, Dean (2009): “Critiquing Capabilities: The Distractions of a Beguiling Concept”, Critical Social Policy, 29(2), 261–278. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0261018308101629
  265. Harvey, David (1979): “Monument and Myth”, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 69(3), 362–381. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1979.tb01262.x
  266. Hay, Gerald C., Jr. (1984): “New Light on Maritain: Jacques Maritain and the French Catholic Intellectuals by Bernard E. Doering. Review”, The Review of Politics, 46(3), 473–475. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500048038
  267. Hayek, Friedrich A. (1960/1978): The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  268. Heimbach-Steins, Marianne (2001): Menschenrechte in Gesellschaft und Kirche: Lernprozesse, Konfliktfelder, Zukunftschancen, Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag. Open Google Scholar
  269. Hellinger, Stephen; Hellinger, Doughlas and O’Regan, Fred M. (1988): Aid for Just Development: Report on the Future of Foreign Assistance, Boulder, CO: Lynne-Rienner Publishers. Open Google Scholar
  270. Hellman, John (1973): “The Opening to the Left in French Catholicism: The Role of the Personalists,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 34(3), 381–390. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/2708959
  271. Hellman, John (1980): “Maritain and Mounier: A Secret Quarrel over the Future of the Church”, The Review of Politics, 42(2), 152–166. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500031429
  272. Hellman, John (1991): “The Anti-democratic Impulse in Catholicism: Jacques Maritain, Ives Simon, and Charles de Gaulle during World War II”, Journal of Church and State, 33(3), 458–473. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/jcs/33.3.453
  273. Herrnstein, Richard J. and Murray, Charles (1994): The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, New York and London: Simon & Shuster. Open Google Scholar
  274. Hittinger, John (2002): Liberty, Wisdom, and Grace: Thomism and Democratic Political Theory, Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  275. Hittinger, John and Fuller, Timothy (2001): “Introduction”, in Fuller, Timothy and Hittinger, John P. (eds.), Reassessing the Liberal State: Reading Maritain’s Man and the State, Washington, D.C.: American Maritain Association, 1–8. Open Google Scholar
  276. Hittinger, John P. (2011): The Vocation of the Catholic Philosopher: From Maritain to John Paul II, Washington: American Maritain Association. Open Google Scholar
  277. Hittinger, Russell (2003): The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World, Wilmington, DE: ISI Books. Open Google Scholar
  278. Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (2011): “Introduction: Genealogies of Human Rights”, in Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (ed.), Human Rights in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press, 1–26. Open Google Scholar
  279. Hogan, Linda (2011): “Human Rights and the Politics of Universality: Insights from History”, Louvain Studies, 35, 181–199. Open Google Scholar
  280. Hollenbach, David (1979): Claims in Conflict: Retrieving and Renewing the Catholic Human Rights Tradition, New York: Paulist Press (Woodstock studies, 4). Open Google Scholar
  281. Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E. (1983): “The Full-Belly Thesis: Should Economic Rights Take Priority over Civil and Political Rights? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa”, Human Rights Quarterly, 5(4), 467–490. Open Google Scholar
  282. Hughes, John (2010): “Jacques Maritain: Pre-Conciliar Conservative or Thomist Liberal Democrat?”, Theology, 113(871), 12–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0040571X1011300103
  283. Human Development Report 1998: Consumption for Human Development, New York: United Nations Development Program. Open Google Scholar
  284. Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development, New York: United Nations Development Program. Open Google Scholar
  285. Hunt, Luke William (2014): “The Global Ethics of Helping and Harming”, Human Rights Quarterly, 36(4), 798–819. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2014.0062
  286. Hunt, Lynn (2007): Inventing Human Rights: A History, New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Open Google Scholar
  287. Huntington, Samuel P. (1993): “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20045621
  288. Huntington, Samuel P. (1997): The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, New York: Simon & Schuster. Open Google Scholar
  289. Hürten, Heinz (1985): „Der Einfluß Jacques Maritains auf das politische Denken in Deutschland“, Jahrbuch für christliche Sozialwissenschaften, 26, 25–39. Open Google Scholar
  290. Hürten, Heinz and Gruber, Hubert (1994): Katholiken, Kirche und Staat als Problem der Historie: Ausgewählte Aufsätze 1963–1992, Paderborn: Schöningh. Open Google Scholar
  291. Ignatieff, Michael et al. (2000): Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar
  292. Islam, Maidul (2011): “Flawed Idea of Justice”, Economic & Political Weekly, 46(32), 116–121. Open Google Scholar
  293. Jackson, William A. (2009): Economics, Culture and Social Theory, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar. Open Google Scholar
  294. Joas, Hans (2013): Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human Rights, Skinner, Alex (trans.), Washington: Georgetown University Press. Open Google Scholar
  295. Joas, Hans (2015): Sind die Menschenrechte westlich?, München: Kösel. Open Google Scholar
  296. Jain, Kusum (2001): Foundation of Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal of the Theories of Maritain and Radhakrishnan, Jaipur: University Book House. Open Google Scholar
  297. John Paul II, Pope (1987): Sollicitudo rei Socialis. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html>. Open Google Scholar
  298. John Paul II, Pope (1991): Centesimus Annus. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_01051991_centesimus-annus.html>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/1971968
  299. John Paul II, Pope (1998): Fides et Ratio. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_14091998_fides-et-ratio.html>. Open Google Scholar
  300. Jonas, Hans (1984): The Imperative of Responsibility, Jonas, Hans and Herr, David (trans.), Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  301. Jonas, Raymond A. (1993): “Monument as Ex-Voto, Monument as Historiosophy: The Basilica of Sacré-Coeur”, French Historical Studies, 18(2), 482–502. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/286877
  302. Kamm, F. M. (2011): “Sen on Justice and Rights: A Review Essay”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 39(1), 82–104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01199.x
  303. Kao, Grace (2011): Grounding Human Rights in a Pluralist World, Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press. Open Google Scholar
  304. Kaufmann, Franz-Xaver; Veit Wilson, John H. and Skelton-Robinson, Thomas (2012): European Foundations of the Welfare State, New York: Berghahn Books. Open Google Scholar
  305. Keller, Catherine and Schneider, Laurel (eds.) (2010): Polydoxy: Theology of Multiplicity and Relation, London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  306. Keller, Linda M. (2001): “The Indivisibility of Economic and Political Rights: A Review of Development as Freedom by Amartya Sen”, Human Rights and Human Welfare, 1(3), 9–14. Open Google Scholar
  307. Kirkup, Alex and Evans, Tony (2009): “The Myth of Western Opposition to Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights? A Reply to Whelan and Donnelly”, Human Rights Quarterly, 31(1), 221–237. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0063
  308. Klamer, Arjo (1989): “A Conversation with Amartya Sen”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(1), 135–150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.1.135
  309. Knight, Frank H. (1947): Freedom and Reform: Essays in Economics and Social Philosophy, New York: Harper & Brothers. Open Google Scholar
  310. Kobusch, Theo (1997): Die Entdeckung der Person: Metaphysik der Freiheit und modernes Menschenbild, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. Open Google Scholar
  311. Kolnai, Aurel (1999): “Between Christ and the Idols of Modernity: A Review of Jacques Maritain’s Man and the State”, in Mahoney, Daniel J. (ed.), Privilege and Liberty and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books, 175–182. Open Google Scholar
  312. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, Geschichte der CDU. Web, 15/08/2014, <http://www.kas.de/wf/de/71.8841/>. Open Google Scholar
  313. Kozinski, Thaddeus J. (2002): “Jacques Maritain’s ‘Democratic Faith’: Heretical or Orthodox?”, Catholic University of America. Web, 12/10/2014, <http://jkalb.freeshell.org/misc/kozinski_maritain.html>. Open Google Scholar
  314. Kozinski, Thaddeus J. (2013): The Political Problem of Religious Pluralism: And Why Philosophers Can’t Solve It, Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar
  315. Kraynak, Robert P. (1998): “The Christian Democracy of Glenn Tinder and Jacques Maritain”, Perspectives on Political Science, 27(2), 69–78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/10457099809601980
  316. Kuznets, Simon (1955): “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. Open Google Scholar
  317. Leiva-Merikakis, Erasmo (1987): “Léon Bloy and Jacques Maritain: Fratres in Eremo”, in Hudson, Deal W. and Mancini, Matthew J. (eds.), Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend, Macon, Ga.: Mercer University Press, 71–90. Open Google Scholar
  318. Lewis, V. Bradley (2009): “Theory and Practice of Human Rights: Ancient and Modern”, Journal of Law, Philosophy and Culture, 3(1), 277–296. Open Google Scholar
  319. Long, Steven A. (2010): Natura pura: On the Recovery of Nature in the Doctrine of Grace, New York: Fordham University Press. Open Google Scholar
  320. MacIntyre, Alasdair (1981/2007): After Virtue, Notre-Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Open Google Scholar
  321. Macleod, Alistair M. (2015): “Amartya Sen on Human Rights in The Idea of Justice”, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 41(1), 11–19. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0191453714553292
  322. Majumdar, Tapas (1998): “Amartya Sen in Search of Impure Welfare Economics: Finding New Space”, Economic & Political Weekly, 33(45), 2860–2862. Open Google Scholar
  323. Marks, Stephen P. and Mahal, Ajay (2010): “Economics and Human Rights Perspectives on Poverty Reduction”, in Andreassen, Bård A.; Marks, Stephen P. and Sengupta, Arjun K. (eds.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Economic Perspectives, Vol. 3, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 19–54. Open Google Scholar
  324. Martin, A. David (1982): “R. H. Tawney as Economist”, Journal of Economic Issues, 16(3), 829–853. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1982.11504035
  325. Martins, Nuno Ornelas (2012): “Sen, Sraffa and the Revival of Classical Political Economy”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(2), 143–157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.683598
  326. Martins, Nuno Ornelas (2012): “Values, Objectivity and Moral Realism”, in Caldas, José Castro and Neves, Vitor (eds.), Facts, Values and Objectivity in Economics, London: Routledge, 64–87. Open Google Scholar
  327. Marx, Karl and Elster, Jon (1986): Karl Marx: A Reader, Cambridge and New York: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809668
  328. McCauliff, Catherine M. A. (2011): “Jacques Maritain’s Embrace of Religious Pluralism and the Declaration on Religious Freedom”, Seton Hall Law Review, 41(2), 593–624. Open Google Scholar
  329. McCool, Gerald A. (1978): “Jacques Maritain: A Neo-Thomist Classic”, The Journal of Religion, 58(4), 380–404. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/486651
  330. McCool, Gerald A. (1978): “Twentieth-Century Scholasticism”, The Journal of Religion, 58, Supplement: Celebrating the Medieval Heritage: A Colloquy on the Thought of Aquinas and Bonaventure, 198–221. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/jr.58.41575991
  331. Mchangama, Jacob and Verdirame, Guglielmo (2013), “Less Is More: The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation: When Defending Liberty”, Foreign Affairs, July 24, 2013. Web, 24/08/2015, <https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2013-07-24/danger-human-rights-proliferation>. Open Google Scholar
  332. McInerny, D. Q. (2007): “The Social Thought of Jacques Maritain”, The Catholic Social Science Review, 12, 155–172. Open Google Scholar
  333. McInerny, Ralph (1991): “Natural Law and Human Rights”, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 36(1), 1–14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ajj/36.1.1
  334. McKeon, Richard P. (1949): “The Philosophic Bases and Material Circumstances of the Rights of Man”, in UNESCO (ed.), Human Rights: Comments and Interpretations: A Symposium edited by UNESCO with an Introduction by Jacques Maritain, London and New York: Allan Wingate, 35–46. Open Google Scholar
  335. McMahon, France E. (1943): “Maritain, Jacques, The Rights of Man and Natural Law: Book Review”, Review of Politics, 5(4), 542. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500002710
  336. McNeill, Desmond and St. Clair, Asunción Lera (2009): Global Poverty, Ethics and Human Rights: The Role of Multilateral Organisations, London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  337. Metz, Johann Baptist (1962): Christliche Anthropozentrik: Über die Denkform des Thomas von Aquin, München: Kösel. Open Google Scholar
  338. Metz, Johann Baptist (1969): “Kirche für die Ungläubigen”, in Filthaut, Theodor (ed.), Umkehr und Erneuerung – Kirche nach dem Konzil, Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 312–329. Open Google Scholar
  339. Mirowski, Philip (1991): “The When, the How and the Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 145–157. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.145
  340. Molnar, Thomas (1998): “Jacques Maritain: Protean Figure of the Century”, Modern Age, 40(3), 281–286. Open Google Scholar
  341. Moore, Charles E. (ed.) (2002): Provocations: Spiritual Writings of Kierkegaard, Farmington, PA: The Bruderhof Foundation Inc. Open Google Scholar
  342. Morsink, Johannes (1999): The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting, and Intent, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.9783/9780812200416
  343. Mounier, Emmanuel (1938): A Personalist Manifesto, London: Longmans, Green and Co. Open Google Scholar
  344. Mounier, Emmanuel (1950): Personalism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar
  345. Moyn, Samuel (2011): “Jacques Maritain, Christian Politics and the Birth of Human Rights”, in Bonanate, Luigi; Papini, Roberto and Sweet, William (eds.), Intercultural Dialogue and Human Rights, Washington, D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 55–76. Open Google Scholar
  346. Moyn, Samuel (2011): “Personalism, Community and the Origins of Human Rights”, in Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (ed.), Human Rights in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge [etc.]: Cambridge University Press, 85–106. Open Google Scholar
  347. Moyn, Samuel (2012): The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History, Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  348. Moyn, Samuel (2014): “The Secret History of Constitutional Dignity”, Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 17(1), 39–73. Open Google Scholar
  349. Moyn, Samuel (2015): Christian Human Rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Open Google Scholar
  350. Müller, Jan-Werner (2008): “Die eigentlich katholische Entschärfung? Jacques Maritain und die christdemokratischen Fluchtwege aus dem Zeitalter der Extreme”, Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, II(3), 40–54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.17104/1863-8937-2008-3-40
  351. Murno, Bradely R. (2003): “Maritain and Universality of Human Rights”, in Sweet, William (ed.), Philosophical Theory and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 109–125. Open Google Scholar
  352. Nagel, Thomas (1986), The View from Nowhere, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  353. Nagel, Thomas (2002): Concealment and Exposure & Other Essays, Oxford and New York [among others]: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  354. Nagel, Thomas (2005): “The Problem of Global Justice”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00027.x
  355. Neal, Patrick (2000): “Three Readings of Political Liberalism: Rawls, Maritain and Crick”, Journal of Political Ideologies, 5(2), 225–246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/713682936
  356. Neuhäuser, Christian (2013): Amartya Sen zur Einführung, Hamburg: Junius. Open Google Scholar
  357. Neuhäuser, Christian (2015): „Amartya Sens Beitrag zu einer praktischen Wirtschaftsethik“, zfwu Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 15(2), 198–214. Open Google Scholar
  358. Nickl, Peter (1992): Jacques Maritain: Eine Einführung in Leben und Werk, Paderborn: Schöningh (Politik- und kommunikationswissenschaftliche Veröffentlichungen der Görres-Gesellschaft). Open Google Scholar
  359. Niebuhr, Reinhold (1943): “A Frenchman States his Credo for Tomorrow”, New York Times, September 5, 1943. Open Google Scholar
  360. Nobelprize.org (1998): “Press Release”, Nobelprize.org, October 14, 1998. Web, 06/09/2014, <http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1998/press.html>. Open Google Scholar
  361. Norris, Pippa and Inglehart, Ronald (2004): Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791017.016
  362. Novak, Michael (1991): “Salute to Jacques Maritain”, in MacInerny, Ralph (ed.), The Catholic Writer: Papers presented at a conference, New York City, September 29–30, 1989, San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 65–82 (The Proceedings of the Wethersfield Institute, Vol. 2). Open Google Scholar
  363. Novak, Michael (1991): The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism, Lanham, Md.: Madison Books and National Book Network. Open Google Scholar
  364. Nozick, Robert (1974): Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell. Open Google Scholar
  365. Nussbaum, Martha C. (1992): “Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism”, Political Theory, 20(2), 202–246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020002002
  366. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000): “Aristotle, Politics, and Human Capabilities: A Response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan”, Ethics, 111(1), 102–140. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/233421
  367. Nussbaum, Martha (2000): Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  368. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2001): “Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options”, Economics and Philosophy, 1(1), 67–88. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0266267101000153
  369. Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2001): “Political Objectivity”, New Literary History, 32(4), 883–906. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2001.0056
  370. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2003): “Langfristige Fürsorge und soziale Gerechtigkeit: Eine Herausforderung der konventionellen Ideen des Gesellschaftsvertrages”, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 51(2), 179-198. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1524/dzph.2003.51.2.179
  371. Nussbaum, Martha (2004): “Beyond ‘Compassion and Humanity’: Justice for Nonhuman Animals”, in Sunstein, Cass and Nussbaum, Martha (eds.), Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 299–320. Open Google Scholar
  372. Okin, Susan (2003): “Poverty, Well-being and Gender: What Counts, Who’s Heard?”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(3), 280–316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2003.00280.x
  373. Oslington, Paul (ed.) (2014): Adam Smith as Theologian, New York and London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  374. O’Neill, Onora (1996): Towards Justice and Virtue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar
  375. Osmani, Siddiqur Rahman (2009): “The Sen System of Social Evaluation”, in Basu, Kaushik and Kanbur, Ravi (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Vol. I, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 15–34. Open Google Scholar
  376. Osmani, Siddiqur Rahman (2012): “Poverty and Human Rights: Building on the Capability Approach”, in Elson, Diane; Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and Vizard, Polly (eds.), Human Rights and the Capabilities Approach: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue, London and New York: Routledge, 193–207. Open Google Scholar
  377. O’Sullivan, James P. (2012): “Maritain and Nussbaum: Two Ironically Promising ‘Essentialist’ Accounts of Basic Social Justice”, The Heythrop Journal, 56(4), 629–642. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2012.00798.x
  378. Oxfam (2016): “An Economy for the 1%”, Oxford: Oxfam International. Web, 24/01/2016, <https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf>. Open Google Scholar
  379. Paul VI, Pope (1967): Populorum Progressio. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/de/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum.html>. Open Google Scholar
  380. Paul VI, Pope (1975): Evangelii Nuntiandi. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_p-vi_exh_19751208_evangelii-nuntiandi.html>. Open Google Scholar
  381. Peter, Fabienne (2012): “Sen’s Idea of Justice and the Locus of Normative Reasoning”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(2), 165–167. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.683599
  382. Phayer, Michael (2000): The Catholic Church and the Holocaust, 1930–1965, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Open Google Scholar
  383. Pierce, Roy (1966): Contemporary French Political Thought, London: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  384. Piketty, Thomas (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, Mass. and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  385. Pius IX, Pope (1864): Quanta cura. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9quanta.htm>. Open Google Scholar
  386. Pius XI, Pope (1931): Quadragesimo Anno. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_19310515_quadragesimo-anno.html>. Open Google Scholar
  387. Pius XI, Pope (1937): Mit brennender Sorge. Web, 19/03/2016, <http://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xi/de/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_14031937_mit-brennender-sorge.html>. Open Google Scholar
  388. Pogge, Thomas (2002/2008): World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, New York: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar
  389. Pogge, Thomas (2005): “Real World Justice”, Journal of Ethics, 9(1/2), 29–53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3313-z
  390. Pogge, Thomas (2005): “Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties”, Ethics and International Affairs, 19(1), 55–83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00490.x
  391. Pogge, Thomas (2005): “World Poverty and Human Rights”, Ethics & International Affairs, 19(1), 1–7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00484.x
  392. Pogge, Thomas (ed.) (2007): Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press, UNESCO Publishing. Open Google Scholar
  393. Pogge, Thomas (2007): “Introduction”, in Pogge, Thomas (ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press, UNESCO Publishing, 3–4. Open Google Scholar
  394. Pogge, Thomas (ed.) (2010): Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Theory and Politics, Vol. II, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Open Google Scholar
  395. Porter, Jean (1994): The Recovery of the Virtue: The Relevance of Aquinas for Christian Ethics, London: SPCK. Open Google Scholar
  396. Power, Susan M. (1998): Jacques Maritain (1882–1973): Christian Democrat, and the Quest for a New Commonwealth, Lanham, Md.: University Press of America. Open Google Scholar
  397. Putnam, Hilary (2002): The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy, and Other Essays, Including the Rosenthal Lectures, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  398. Putnam, Hilary and Walsh, Vivian Charles (2012): The End of Value-free Economics, London and New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  399. Raghavan, Sharad TCA (2016): “NDA has failed on reforms, says Amartya Sen: Interview with Sen”, The Hindu, January 8, 2016. Web, 14/01/2016, <http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/interview-with-amartya-sen/article8077882.ece>. Open Google Scholar
  400. Ratzinger, Joseph (2006): Values in a Time of Upheaval, San Francisco: Ignatius Press. Open Google Scholar
  401. Ratzinger, Joseph and Pera, Marcello (2007): Without Roots: The West, Relativism, Christianity, Islam, New York: Basic Books. Open Google Scholar
  402. Rawls, John (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  403. Rawls, John (1996): Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar
  404. Rawls, John (1999/2000): The Law of Peoples with “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”, Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  405. Rawls, John (2001): Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Kelly, E. (ed.), Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  406. Regan, George M. (1967): “Natural Law in the Church Today”, Catholic Lawyer, 13(21), 21–41. Open Google Scholar
  407. Riefstahl, Hermann (1978): „Jacques Maritain: Zum 5. Jahrestag seines Todes“, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 32(1), 103–108. Open Google Scholar
  408. Ritzler, Benedikt (2000): Freiheit in der Umarmung des ewig Liebenden: Die historische Entwicklung des Personverständnisses bei Jacques Maritain, Frankfurt am Main and New York: Lang. Open Google Scholar
  409. Roberts, Kevin (2009): “Social Choice Theory and the Informational Basis Approach”, in Morris, Christopher W. (ed.), Amartya Sen, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 115–137. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511.007
  410. Robeyns, Ingrid (2000): An Unworkable Idea or a Promising Alternative? Sen’s Capability Approach Re-Examined, Leuven: Centre for Economic Studies Discussion Paper 00.30 Katholieke Universiteit. Web, 27/04/2015, <https://feb.kuleuven.be/eng/ew/discussionpapers/Dps00/DPS0030.pdf>. Open Google Scholar
  411. Robeyns, Ingrid (2005): “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey”, Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
  412. Robeyns, Ingrid (2008): “Sen’s Capability Approach and Feminist Concerns”, in Comim, Qizilbash and Alkire, Sabine (eds.), The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 82–104. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.004
  413. Romulo, Carlos (1950): “The Natural Law and International Law”, Natural Law Institute Proceedings, 3, 119–128. Open Google Scholar
  414. Roosevelt, Eleanor (1958): On My Own, New York: Harper & Brothers. Open Google Scholar
  415. Rorty, Richard (1994): “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality”, in Shute, Stephen and Hurley, Susan (eds.), On Human Rights: The Oxford Amnesty Lectures 1993, New York: Basic Books, 111–134. Open Google Scholar
  416. Rowland, Tracey (2003): Culture and the Thomist Tradition: After Vatican II, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  417. Sardesai, V. S. (2008): Amartya Sen’s Hindu Bash, New Delhi: Readworthy. Open Google Scholar
  418. Satz, Debra (2012): “Amartya Sen’s The Idea of Justice: What Approach, Which Capabilities?”, Rutgers Law Journal, 43(2), 277–293. Open Google Scholar
  419. Saure, Phillipp (2017): Christliches Naturrecht in der pluralistischen Moderne: Jacques Maritains Kritik der Allgemeinen Erklärung der Menschenrechte, Paderborn: Schöningh. Open Google Scholar
  420. Scanlon, Thomas (1998): What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  421. Schall, James V. (1993): “The Intellectual Context of Natural Law”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 38(1), 85–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ajj/38.1.85
  422. Schall, James V. (1998): Jacques Maritain: The Philosopher in Society, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. Open Google Scholar
  423. Schmidgen, Henning (2012): “The Materiality of Things? Bruno Latour, Charles Péguy and the History of Science”, History of the Human Sciences, 26(1), 3–28. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/0952695112461736
  424. Schroeder, Doris (2012): “Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Appeal to Separate the Conjoined Twins”, Ethical Theory Moral Practice, 15(3): 323–335. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/s10677-011-9326-3
  425. Schultz, Walter James (1982): Jacques Maritain’s Social Critique and His Personalism, Open Access Books and Theses, McMaster University, Paper 1558. Web, 18/04/2014, <https://macsphere.mcmaster.ca/bitstream/11375/6232/1/fulltext.pdf>. Open Google Scholar
  426. Sengupta, Arjun (2001): “Right to Development as a Human Right”, Economic & Political Weekly, 36(27), 2527–2536. Open Google Scholar
  427. Sengupta, Arjun (2002): “On the Theory and Practice of the Right to Development”, Human Rights Quarterly, 24(4), 837–889. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2002.0054
  428. Sengupta, Arjun (2007): “Extreme Poverty and Human Rights: A Mission Report on the US”, Economic & Political Weekly, 42(14), 1298–1307. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.961230
  429. Sengupta, Arjun (2007): “Poverty Eradication and Human Rights”, in Pogge, Thomas (ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor?, Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press, UNESCO Publishing, 323–344. Open Google Scholar
  430. Sengupta, Arjun (2009): “Elements of a Theory of the Right to Development”, in Basu, Kaushik and Kanbur, Ravi (eds.), Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, Vol. I, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 80–100. Open Google Scholar
  431. Sengupta, Arjun (2010): “Human Rights and Extreme Poverty: An Economist’s Perspective”, in Andreassen, Bård A.; Marks, Stephen P. and Sengupta, Arjun K. (eds.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Economic Perspectives, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 293–318. Open Google Scholar
  432. Sengupta, Arjun (2013): “Conceptualizing the Right to Development for the Twenty-first Century”, in United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (ed.), Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development, New York and Geneva: United Nations Publication, 67–87. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.18356/587738a4-en
  433. Sengupta, Arjun; Negi, Archana and Basu, Moushumi (2005): Reflections on the Right to Development, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, Calif. and London: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.4135/9788132102144
  434. Shklar, Judith (1958): “Bergson and the Politics of Intuition”, The Review of Politics, 20(4), 634–656. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500034264
  435. Siedentop, Larry (2014): Inventing the Individual: The Origins of Western Liberalism, Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Open Google Scholar
  436. Sigmund, Paul E. (1987): “Maritain on Politics”, in Hudson, Deal W. and Mancini, Matthew J. (eds.), Understanding Maritain: Philosopher and Friend, Macon: Mercer University Press, 153–170. Open Google Scholar
  437. Sigmund, Paul E. (1987): “The Catholic Tradition and Modern Democracy”, The Review of Politics, 49(4), 530–548. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500035452
  438. Silverstein, Stuart and Miller, Marjorie (1998): “Poverty Scholar Wins Nobel in Economics”, Los Angeles Times, October 15, 1998. Web 12/01/2016, <http://articles.latimes.com/1998/oct/15/news/mn-32729>. Open Google Scholar
  439. Smith, Brooke Williams (1976): Jacques Maritain, Antimodern or Ultramodern? An Historical Analysis of His Critics, His Thought, and His Life, New York: Elsevier. Open Google Scholar
  440. Sneddon, Chris; Howarth, Richard B. and Norgaard, Richard B. (2006): “Sustainable Development in a post-Brundtland World”, Ecological Economics, 57(2), 253–268. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013
  441. Spiegel Kultur (1969): „Philosophen / Maritain: Achtung, es brennt“, Der Spiegel, 11/1969, 161–162. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.14315/prth-1969-0403
  442. Stefiszyn, Christof and Heyns, Karen (eds.) (2006): Human Rights, Peace and Justice in Africa: A Reader, Cape Town: Pretoria University Law Press. Open Google Scholar
  443. Steinkamp, Hermann (1967): Der Personalismus in der Sozialphilosophie Jacques Maritains, Gelsenkirchen-Buer: Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität. Open Google Scholar
  444. Stewart, Frances and Deneulin, Severine (2002): “Amartya Sen’s Contribution to Development Thinking”, Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 61–70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1007/BF02686262
  445. Strauss, Leo (1953): Natural Right and History, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar
  446. Streeten, Paul (2004): “Review of Rationality and Freedom by Amartya Sen”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(4), 889–891. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/381117
  447. Suzumura, Kōtarō (1996): “Welfare, Rights, and Social Choice Procedure: A Perspective”, Analyse & Kritik, 18(1), 20–37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1515/auk-1996-0102
  448. Suzumura, Kōtarō (2002): “Welfarism, Individual Rights and Procedural Fairness”, in Arrow, Kenneth Joseph; Sen, Amartya and Suzumura, Kōtarō (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier, 605–685. Open Google Scholar
  449. Swacker, Bob and Deimling, Brian (2000): “A Nineteenth-Century Church for the New Millennium: The Legacy of Pius IX and John Paul II”, The Massachusetts Review, 41(1), 121–131. Open Google Scholar
  450. Sweet, William (1995): “Can there Be Moral Knowledge?”, Maritain Studies, 11, 159–190. Open Google Scholar
  451. Sweet, William (2011): “Human Rights in Ethics, Law and Politics”, in Bonanate, Luigi; Papini, Roberto and Sweet, William (eds.), Intercultural Dialogue and Human Rights, Washington, D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 31–54. Open Google Scholar
  452. Synod of Bishops (1971): Justice in the World. Web, 17/03/2016, <http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/resources/synodjw.htm>. Open Google Scholar
  453. Taylor, Charles (1999): “Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights”, in Bauer, Joanne R. and Bell, Daniel A. (eds.), The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, Cambridge and London [among others]: Cambridge University Press, 124–144. Open Google Scholar
  454. Taylor, Quentin (2010): “Thomas Hobbes, Political Economist: His Changing Historical Fortunes”, The Independent Review, 14(3), 415–433. Open Google Scholar
  455. The Washington Post (2006): “An Interview with Amartya Sen”, Washingtonpost.com, June 12, 2006. Web, 22/07/2015, <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2006/06/08/DI2006060800699.html>. Open Google Scholar
  456. Thompson, Mike J. (2011): “On Self-Interest”, in Opdebeeck, H.; Zsolnai, László and Bouckaert, Luk (eds.), Spiritual Humanism and Economic Wisdom: Essays in Honour of Luk Bouckaert’s 70th Anniversary, Antwerpen and Apeldoorn: Garant, 79–88. Open Google Scholar
  457. Thompson, Phillip (2001): “Review: Jacques Maritain: The Philosopher in Society by James V. Schall”, The Journal of Religion, 81(29), 315–316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1086/490850
  458. Trapani, John G. (2001): “Different Music – the Same Keyboard: Obscene Art/Pornography and the First Amendment Debate”, in Fuller, Timothy and Hittinger, John P. (eds.), Reassessing the Liberal State: Reading Maritain’s Man and the State, Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 166–175. Open Google Scholar
  459. Trower, Philip (2003): Turmoil & Truth: The Historical Roots of the Modern Crisis in the Catholic Church, San Francisco: Ignatius Press. Open Google Scholar
  460. Tuck, Richard (1979): Natural Rights Theories: Their Origins and Development, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Open Google Scholar
  461. Tully, James (2013): “Two Ways of Realizing Justice and Democracy: Linking Amartya Sen and Elinor Ostrom, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(2), 220–232. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757914
  462. Turner, Bryan S. (2013): “Alasdair MacIntyre on Morality, Community and Natural Law”, Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 239–253. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1468795X12472550
  463. Twiss, Sumner B. (2004): “History, Human Rights, and Globalization”, The Journal of Religious Ethics, 32(1), 39–70. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.0384-9694.2004.00154.x
  464. UN General Assembly (1993): Declaration on the Right to Development. Web, 19/11/2015, <http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/41/a41r128.htm>. Open Google Scholar
  465. United Nations (1948): Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Web, 12/01/2016, http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/>. Open Google Scholar
  466. Vakulabharanam, Vamsicharan and Motiram, Sripad: Progressive, but Problematic: An Appreciation and Critique of Amartya Sen. Web, 12/01/2016, <http://www.proxsa.org/resources/ghadar/v3n1/sen.htm>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2016.1203862
  467. Vallentyne, Peter (2005): “Debate: Capabilities versus Opportunities for Well-being”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(3), 359–371. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00227.x
  468. Vallentyne, Peter (2009): “Sen on Sufficiency, Priority, and Equality”, in Morris, Christopher W. (ed.), Amartya Sen, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 138–169. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800511.008
  469. Van Bueren, Geraldine (ed.) (2011): Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Law’s Duty to the Poor, Vol. 4, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Open Google Scholar
  470. Vatican II (1965): Dignitatis humanae: Declaration on Religious Freedom. Web, 09/02/2016, <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html>. Open Google Scholar
  471. Vatican II (1965): Gaudium et spes: Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World. Web, 09/02/2016, <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html>. Open Google Scholar
  472. Villiers, Marjorie (1965): Charles Péguy: A Study in Integrity, New York: Harper & Row. Open Google Scholar
  473. Virt, Günter (2013): “Moral Norms and the Forgotten Virtue of Epikeia in the Pastoral Care of the Divorced and Remarried”, Melita Theologica, 63(1), 17–34. Open Google Scholar
  474. Vizard, Polly (2006): “Pogge -vs- Sen on Global Poverty and Human Rights”, Ethics and Economics, 3(2), 1–21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273874.003.0003
  475. Vizard, Polly (2006): Poverty and Human Rights: Sen’s ‘Capability Perspective’ Explored, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar
  476. Vizard, Polly (2010): “The Idea of Justice: Sen’s Treatment of Human Rights”, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 11(4), 615–621. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2010.520977
  477. Vizard, Polly; Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and Elson, Diane (2012): “Introduction”, in Elson, Diane; Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko and Vizard, Polly (eds.), Human Rights and the Capabilities Approach: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue, London and New York: Routledge, 1–22. Open Google Scholar
  478. Von Hippel, Ernst (1959): “The Role of Natural Law in the Legal Decisions of the German Federal Republic”, Natural Law Forum, Notre Dame Law School, 42, 106–118. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/ajj/4.1.106
  479. Wagner, William Joseph (2005): “Universal Human Rights, the United Nations, and the Telos of Human Dignity”, Ave Maria Law Review, 3(1), 197–226. Open Google Scholar
  480. Waldron, Jeremy (1987/2015): Nonsense upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar
  481. Wallace, Deborah (1999): “Jacques Maritain and Alasdair Macintyre: The Person, the Common Good and Human Rights”, in Sweetman, Brendan (ed.), The Failure of Modernism: The Cartesian Legacy and Contemporary Pluralism, Mishawaka: American Maritain Association, 127–140. Open Google Scholar
  482. Walsh, Adrian (2004): “The Morality of the Market and the Medieval Schoolmen”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 3(2), 241–259. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1470594X04042967
  483. Walsh, Vivian (2000): “Smith after Sen”, Review of Political Economy, 12(1), 5–25. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/095382500106795
  484. Watkins, Michelle and McInerney, Ralph (1995): “Jacques Maritain and the Rapprochement of Liberalism and Communitarianism”, in Grasso, Kenneth L.; Bradley, Gerard V. and Hunt, Robert P. (eds.), Catholicism, Liberalism and Communitarianism, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 151–172. Open Google Scholar
  485. Waltz, Susan (2001): “Universalizing Human Rights: The Role of Small States in the Construction of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, 23(1), 44–72. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2001.0012
  486. Waltz, Susan (2002): “Reclaiming and Rebuilding the History of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Third World Quarterly, 23(3), 437–448. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1080/01436590220138378
  487. Wellman, Carl (1998): The Proliferation of Rights: Moral Progress or Empty Rhetoric?, Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar
  488. White, Lynn (1967): “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis”, Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
  489. Williams, Thomas D. (2005): Who Is My Neighbor? Personalism and the Foundations of Human Rights, Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press. Open Google Scholar
  490. Wolf, Donald (1960): “Emmanuel Mounier: A Catholic of the Left”, Review of Politics, 22(3), 324–344. Open Google Scholar
  491. Wolfe, C. J. (2011): “Lessons from the Friendship of Jacques Maritain with Saul Alinsky”, The Catholic Social Science Review, 16, 229–240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5840/cssr20111620
  492. Woodcock, Andrew (2006): “Jacques Maritain, Natural Law and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Journal of the History of International Law, 8(2), 245–266. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1163/157180506779884455
  493. Worland, Stephen Theodore (1967): Scholasticism and Welfare Economics, Notre Dame and London: University of Notre Dame Press. Open Google Scholar
  494. World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). Web, 08/12/2015, <http://unu.edu/about/unu-system/wider#overview>. Open Google Scholar
  495. Yoshino, Kenji (2006): “We Contain Multitudes: A Review of Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny by Amartya Sen”, Sunday Book Review, New York Times, May 14, 2006. Web, 30/7/2015, <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/14/books/review/14yoshino.html>. Open Google Scholar
  496. Yves, Simon R. (1943): “Maritain’s Philosophy of the Sciences”, Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 5, 85–102. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1353/tho.1943.0007
  497. Zakaria, Fareed (1994): “Culture Is Destiny: A Conversation with Lee Kuan Yew”, Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 109–126. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.2307/20045923
  498. Zakaria, Fareed (1999): “Beyond Money: A Review of Sen’s Development as Freedom”, New York Times, November 28, 1999. Web, 12/01/2016, <https://www.nytimes.com/books/99/11/28/reviews/991128.28zakarit.html>. Open Google Scholar
  499. Zakaria, Fareed (2003): The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad, New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Open Google Scholar
  500. Zamagni, Stefano (2010): “Catholic Social Thought, Civil Economy, and the Spirit of Capitalism”, in Finn, Daniel K. (ed.), The True Wealth of Nation: Catholic Social Thought and Economic Life, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 63–93. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199739813.003.0004
  501. Zimmermann, Benedicte (2006): “Pragmatism and the Capability Approach: Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research”, European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4), 467–484. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.1177/1368431006073014
  502. Zuckert, Michael (1994): Natural Rights and the New Republicanism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Open Google Scholar

Similar publications

from the topics "Sociology General", "Economics"
Cover of book: Intersektionalität in Therapie und Beratung
Edited Book Full access
(Un-)Möglichkeiten
Intersektionalität in Therapie und Beratung
Cover of book: Sichtbarkeit von weiblicher wissenschaftlicher Leistung im Fokus
Edited Book Full access
Ergebnisse aus drei Projekten der BMBF-Förderlinie „Innovative Frauen im Fokus"
Sichtbarkeit von weiblicher wissenschaftlicher Leistung im Fokus
Cover of book: Sportmanagement
Edited Book No access
Praxishandbuch
Sportmanagement
Cover of book: Siedlungsbausteine für bestehende Wohnquartiere
Edited Book No access
Impulse zur Vernetzung energieeffizienter Technologien (SWIVT)
Siedlungsbausteine für bestehende Wohnquartiere
Cover of book: Relations between the EU and East Africa in a changing world order
Book Titles No access
A study on the negotiation and implementiation of interregional trade agreements
Relations between the EU and East Africa in a changing world order

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Welcome to Inlibra – Your Platform for Digital Professional Information

Nomos, C.H.Beck, VDI and over 100 other publishers combine their content here to create one of the largest platforms for digital professional information.

Research efficiently, cite long-term, use reliably – all united in one place.

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via Open Athens
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS BibTex