Spectator in the Cartesian Theater
Where Theories of Mind Went Wrong since Descartes- Authors:
- Publisher:
- 2023
Summary
The “Cartesian Theater” is Dennett’s famous metaphor for the idea that a homunculus or “little man” watches the screen on which our thoughts appear. However, contrary to much academic teaching and scholarship, Spectator in the Cartesian Theater: Where Theories of Mind Went Wrong since Descartes shows that Descartes was not guilty of this fallacy for which he has been blamed. In his physiological writings neglected by philosophers, Descartes explained that the pseudo-explanation arises not from what is included in our theory of consciousness, but rather from what is missing. We fail to notice that the theory is incomplete because we are intuitively doing part of the explanatory work. That is, we are the spectators in the Cartesian Theater.
With detailed critiques, Peter Slezak shows that Searle’s Chinese Room Argument, Kripke’s theory of proper names, Davidson’s semantics of natural language and Kosslyn’s theory of visual imagery rely on what is intuitively meaningful to us rather than what follows from the theory. Slezak offers a novel solution to the elusive logic of the Cogito argument, showing it to be akin to the Liar Paradox. Since Descartes’ perplexity is our own, this shows how the subjective certainty of consciousness and the mind-body problem can arise for a physical system. An intelligent computer would think that it isn’t one.
Keywords
Search publication
Bibliographic data
- Copyright year
- 2023
- ISBN-Print
- 978-1-6669-2375-9
- ISBN-Online
- 978-1-6669-2376-6
- Publisher
- Lexington, Lanham
- Language
- English
- Pages
- 334
- Product type
- Book Titles
Table of contents
- Contents No access
- Preface No access
- Acknowledgements No access
- Introduction: Illusions No access Pages 1 - 16
- 1. Dangerous Meditations No access Pages 17 - 28
- 2. Illusionism and The Phenomenological Fallacy No access Pages 29 - 48
- 3. What It’s Like: Conscious Experience Itself No access Pages 49 - 68
- 4. Cogito, Ergo Sum: The Diagonal Deduction No access Pages 69 - 96
- 5. The Mind’s Eye: Visual Imagery No access Pages 97 - 118
- 6. In the Chinese Room: Life Without Meaning1 No access Pages 119 - 134
- 7. Meaning: Interpretation or Explanation? No access Pages 135 - 151
- 8. Proper Names: The Omniscient Observer No access Pages 152 - 186
- 9. The Theory of Ideas: Fodor’s Guilty Passions No access Pages 187 - 213
- 10. Descartes’ Neurocomputational Philosophy No access Pages 214 - 232
- 11. What is Knowledge?The Gettier Problem No access Pages 233 - 242
- 12. Disjunctivism: The Argument from Illusion (Again) No access Pages 243 - 256
- 13. Newcomb’s Problem: Demons, Deceivers, and Liars No access Pages 257 - 278
- Conclusion No access Pages 279 - 282
- References No access Pages 283 - 316
- Index No access Pages 317 - 332
- About the Author No access Pages 333 - 334





