Cover des Buchs: Living Together
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Sammelband Kein Zugriff

Living Together

Discourses on Citizenship in Turkey
Herausgeber:innen:
Verlag:
 2019

Zusammenfassung

Zur aktuellen Kritik an der modernen Politik gehören die Debatten über die heutigen Probleme der Demokratie, der politischen Partizipation, der Öffentlichkeit, des Pluralismus, des Geschlechts, der Ökologie und der Freiheit, um nur einige zu nennen. Es darf aber nicht vergessen werden, dass die Probleme des Zusammenlebens zunächst die Überwindung der Sichtweise von Politik als einem Akt zwischen Individuen, Nationen, Institutionen und politischen Ideologien erfordert. Tatsächlich ist das Problem des Zusammenlebens eine Frage des Zusammenlebens mit den anderen, mit dem Staat und den Institutionen, mit Tieren und Natur, mit Kunst und Kulturen. Diese politische Dimension manifestiert sich auch in jedem Element des praktischen Lebens und macht es notwendig, Geschlecht, Behindertenrechte, Natur und Ökologie, Tiere, soziale Medien, Fragen der kulturellen, intellektuellen und künstlerischen Freiheit in der Praxis und Politik des Zusammenlebens zu berücksichtigen. Deshalb hat das Zusammenleben nicht nur eine zwischenmenschliche Sphäre. Der Band beschäftigt sich in 13 Kapiteln mit verschiedenen Dimensionen des Zusammenlebens.

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2019
Copyrightjahr
2019
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-5850-0
ISBN-Online
978-3-8452-9983-9
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
Politics, Society and Culture in Turkey | Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in der Türkei
Band
4
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
200
Produkttyp
Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 10
  2. Autor:innen:
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Transformation of the Content of Democracy Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. The Democratic Rhetoric of Turkey’s Center-Right Political Parties Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  3. Autor:innen:
    1. Turkish Modernization and Two Main Faces of Nationalism in Turkey Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Political Nationalism, Transcendental State Perception and One-Man Cult Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Civil Society, Democracy and the Politics of Identities Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Conclusion: A Model Suggestion for Coexistence in Turkey Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  4. Autor:innen:
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Ageism and Age Discrimination Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Factors Triggering Elder Discrimination Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Theoretical View towards Elder Discrimination Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Reflections of Intrafamilial Ageism to Language Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  5. Autor:innen:
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. The Right Body Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Regulating Social Space and Discourse Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Case Study: Spina Bifida and Turkish Spina Bifida Association Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  6. Autor:innen:
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Schmitt’s Concept of the Political: Inscription into the State Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Plurality and the Political Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Schmitt’s Political Theology: Representation through Decision Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  7. Autor:innen:
    1. Typologies of War Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. The World Civil War Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. The World Civil War and Critique of International Law Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. The Partisan Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  8. Autor:innen:
    1. State from Nation to Democratic Type Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Material and Social Forces of State Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Global Era and Civil Society Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  9. Autor:innen:
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Conceptual Framework Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Citizenship Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. European Union Citizenship Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Scope of the European Union Citizenship Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. EU Citizenship and European Integration Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    7. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    8. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  10. Autor:innen:
    1. Legacy of Modern Politics Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Living Together Today Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  11. Autor:innen:
    1. Conceptual Framework: Reason and Homogeneity Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. Publicity and Civil Society Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Liberalism and Public Sphere Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. Collapse and Re-establishment of Public Sphere: Philosophy of Habermas Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Myth of the Public Lost: On Arendt Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Sennett Sociology: On Inner Cultural Dimension of Bourgeois Public Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    7. In Lieu of Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    8. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  12. Autor:innen:
    1. Works Cited Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
  13. Autor:innen:
    1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. The Tower of Babel as a Metaphor and Varied Languages Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Virtually Getting Together Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. From Pictogram to the Alphabet, From the Alphabet to Emojis Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Emojis as a Virtual Sign System Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. Signifier/Signified=Emoji? Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    7. Norm, Natural, and Ordinary Emojis Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    8. Syntax of Emojis Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    9. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    10. Bibliography Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:

Literaturverzeichnis (386)

  1. Çakır, Ruşen, Bozan, İrfan, Talu, Balkan. (2004). “İmam Hatip Liseleri: Efsanelerve Gerçekler”. TESEV Yayınları: İstanbul.<http://tesev.org.tr/tr/yayin/imam-hatip-liseleri-efsaneler-ve-gercekler/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  2. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. (2011). <http://www.korea-dpr.com/>. Retrieved February 21, 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  3. Draper, Hal. (1974). Marx on Democratic Forms of Government. Socialist Register, 11, 101-124. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  4. Draper, Hal. (1977). Karl Marx’s Theory of Revolution I: State and Bureaucracy. 1. New York and London: Monthly Review Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  5. Economist. (2019). Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy. A report by the Economist Intelligence Unit. <http://www.eiu.com/home.aspx>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  6. Freedom House. (2018). Democracy in Crisis: Freedom in the World 2018. <https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FH_FITW_Report_2018_Final_SinglePage.pdf>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  7. Gramsci, Antonio. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (eds. and trans). Lawrence and Wishart: London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  8. Hammar, Tomas. (1990). Democracy and the Nation State: Aliens, Denizens and Citizens in a World of International Migration. Aldershot: Avebury. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  9. Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. (2002). “The Motherland Party: The Challenge of Institutionalization in a Charismatic Leader Party”. in Barry Rubin and Metin Heper (eds.). Political Parties in Turkey. Frank Cass: London and Portland. 41-61. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  10. Levi, Avner. (1991). “The Justice Party, 1961-1980”. In Metin Heper and Jacob M. Landau (eds.). Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey. I. B. Tauris: London and NY. 134-151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  11. Macpherson, Crawford Brough. (1979). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. 8th edition. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  12. Marx, Karl. (1972). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 6th edition. Progress Publishers: Moscow. (Original work published in 1852). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  13. Michels, Robert. (2001). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Moden Democracy. Batoche Books: Ontario. (Original work published in 1911). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  14. Mudde, Cas. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39 (4), 542-563. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  15. Munck, Gerardo. (2016). “What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy”. Democratization, 23 (1), 1-26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  16. Öniş, Ziya. (2004). “Turgut Özal and his Economic Legacy: Turkish Neo-Liberalism in Critical Perspective”. Middle Eastern Studies, 40 (4), 113-134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  17. Roper, Brian. (2013). The History of Democracy: A Marxist Interpretation. Pluto Press: London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  18. Sakallioğlu, ÜmitCizre. (1997, January). “The Anatomy of the Turkish Military’s Political Autonomy”. Comparative Politics, 29 (2), 151-166. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  19. Sarıbay, Ali Yaşar. (1991). “The Democratic Party, 1946-1960”. In Metin Heper and Jacob M. Landau (eds.). Political Parties and Democracy in Turkey. I. B. Tauris: London and NY. 119-133. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  20. Savran, Gülnur. (1987). Marx’ın Düşüncesinde Demokrasi: Siyasetin Eleştiri [Democracy in Marx’s Thought: The Critique of the Politics]. 11. Tez [The 11th Thesis]. 6, 52-66. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  21. Schumpeter, A. Joseph. (2003). Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy. 5th edition. Routledge: London and NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  22. Selçuk, Orçun. (2016). “Strong presidents and weak institutions: populism in Turkey, Venezuela and Ecuador”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (4), 571-589. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  23. Sørensen, Georg. (2008). Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a Changing World. 3rd edition. Westview Press: Boulder, Colorado. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  24. Tilly, Charles. (2003). “Inequality, Democratization, and De-Democratization”. Sociological Theory, 21 (1), 37-43. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  25. Tilly, Charles. (2007). Democracy. Cambridge University Press: NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  26. Turner, Bryan. S. (2016). “We are all denizens now: On the erosion of citizenship”, Citizenship Studies, 20 (6-7), 679-692. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  27. Türk, Bahadır. (2014). Muktedir: Türk Sağ Geleneği ve Recep Tayyip Erdoğan [Competent: Turkish Right Tradition and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]. İletişim: İstanbul. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  28. Uslu, Ateş. (2012). “Demokrasi” [Democracy]. In Gökhan Atılgan and Atilla Aytekin (eds.).Siyaset Bilimi: Kavramlar, İdeolojiler, Disiplinlerarası İlişkiler [Political Science: Concepts, Ideologies, and Interdisciplinary Relations]. Yordam Kitap: İstanbul. 123-137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  29. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. (1995). Democracy against Capitalism: Renewing historical materialism. Cambridge University Press: Cambridgeand NY. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  30. Yabanci, Bilge. (2016). “Populism as the problem child of democracy: AKP’s enduring appeal and the use of meso-level actors”. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16 (4), 591-617. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  31. Zürcher, Erik-Jan. (2004). Turkey: A Modern History. 3rd edition. I.B. Tauris: London. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-11
  32. Aktoprak, E. (2016). “Postkolonyal Bir Dava Olarak Yeni Türkiye’nin Yeni Ulusu”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 71(1), 1-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  33. Berkes, N. (1975). Türk Düşününde Batı Sorunu, Bilgi Publishing House, Ankara. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  34. Berkes, N. (2007). Türkiye’de Çağdaşlaşma, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  35. Bora, T. (2017). Cereyanlar: Türkiye’de Siyasi İdeolojiler, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  36. Çaha, Ö. (2003). Aşkın Devletten Sivil Topluma, İstanbul: Gendaş Kültür Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  37. Durgun, S. (2018). Memalik-i Şahane’den Vatan’a, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  38. Erözden, O. (2013). Ulus-Devlet, İstanbul: On İki Levha Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  39. Gökalp, Z. (2007). Hars ve Medeniyet, Ankara: Elips Kitap Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  40. Göle, N. (2011). Melez Desenler: İslam ve Modernlik Üzerine, İstanbul: Metis Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  41. Gülalp, H. (2003). Kimlikler Siyaseti: Türkiye’de Siyasal İslamın Temelleri, İstanbul: Metis Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  42. Kaya, İ. (2006). Sosyal Teori ve Geç Modernlikler: Türk Deneyimi, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  43. Kaya, İ. (2014). Yeni Türkiye: Modernliği Olmayan Kapitalizm, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  44. Keyder, Ç. (1997). “Whither the Project of Modernity? Turkey in the 1990s”, Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, Eds. Sibel Bozdoğan & Reşat Kasaba, USA: University of Washington Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  45. Kongar, E. (2016). 21. Yüzyılda Türkiye: 2000’li Yıllarda Türkiye’nin Toplumsal Yapısı, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi Publishing Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  46. Koyuncu, B. (2014). Benim Milletim: AK Parti İktidarı, Din ve Ulusal Kimlik, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  47. Mardin, Ş. (2002). Türkiye’de Toplum ve Siyaset, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  48. Mardin, Ş. (2007). Türkiye’de Din ve Siyaset, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  49. Özbey, K. (2015). “Muhafazakâr İslamcı İktidarın Yeni Ulus İnşası”, Yeni Türkiye’nin Toplumsal Yapısı, Edt. İbrahim Kaya, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  50. Öztürk, A. (2015). İzlenimler: AKP Türkiye’si, Ankara: Gündoğan Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  51. Saraçoğlu, C. (2013). “AKP, Milliyetçilik ve Dış Politika: Bir Milliyetçilik Doktrini Olarak Stratejik Derinlik”, Alternatif Politika, 5(1), 52-68. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  52. Tokdoğan, N. (2018). Yeni Osmanlıcılık: Hınç, Nostalji, Narsisizm, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  53. Toprak, B. vd. (2009). Türkiye’de Farklı Olmak: Din ve Muhafazakârlık Ekseninde Ötekileştirilenler, İstanbul: Metis Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  54. Türk, H. B. (2014). Muktedir: Türk Sağ Geleneği ve Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  55. Yaşlı, F. (2014). AKP, Cemaat, Sünni-Ulus: Yeni Türkiye Üzerine Tezler, İstanbul: Yordam Kitap Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  56. Yıldız, A. (2010). Ne Mutlu Türküm Diyebilene: Türk Ulusal Kimliğinin Etno-Seküler Sınırları (1919-1938), İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  57. Yılmaz, Z. (2018).Yeni Türkiye’nin Ruhu: Hınç, Tahakküm, Muhtaçlaştırma, İstanbul: İletişim Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-27
  58. Akgeyik, T. (2006), “Sosyal Güvenlikte Reform Eğilimleri: Geleneksel Sistemlerden Bireysel Emeklilik Programlarına Dönüşüm”. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi, 51, 47-99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  59. Altan, Ömer Zühtü (2006), Sosyal Politika. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  60. Baybora, D. (2010), “Çalışma Yaşamında Yaş Ayrımcılığı ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde Yaş Ayrımcılığı Düzenlemesi Üzerine”. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 24, 33-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  61. Beğer, Tanju, Yavuzer, Hakan (2012), “Yaşlılık ve Yaşlılık Epidemiyolojisi”, Klinik Gelişim, 25, 1-3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  62. Çayır, Kenan (2012), Yaşçılık/ Yaşa Dayalı Ayrımcılık: Ayrımcılık, Çok Boyutlu Yaklaşımlar (İç), (İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  63. Çilingiroğlu, Nesrin ve Demirel, Simge (2004). “Yaşlılık ve Yaşlı Ayrımcılığı”. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, 7 (4), 225-230. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  64. Demirbilek, Sevda (2005). Sosyal Güvenlik Sosyolojisi. (İzmir: Legal Yayıncılık). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  65. Emiroğlu, V. (1995), Yaşlılık ve Yaşlının Sosyal Uyumu, (Ankara:Şafak Matbaacılık). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  66. Gendron, Tracey L. Inker, Jennifer, Welleford, Elizabeth Ayn (2017), “A Theory of Relational Ageism: A Discourse Analysis of the 2015 White House Conference on Aging”. The Gerontologist, V: 58, I: 2, 242- 250,https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/58/2/242/2951291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  67. Giddens, Anthony (2013), Sosyoloji, (İstanbul: Kırmızı Yayınları). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  68. Hogg, A. Michael ve Vaughan, Graham M. (2011), Sosyal Psikoloji, Çev: İbrahim Yıldız, Aydın Gelmez, (Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  69. Kalaycıoğlu, Sibel, Tol, Uğraş, Küçükural, Önder, Cengiz, Kurtuluş, “Yaşlılar ve Yaşlı Yakınları Açısından Yaşam Biçimi Tercihleri”, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Raporu. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  70. Kayacan, Gülay (2017), “Modern Toplumlarda Ölüm Algısı ve Yaşçılık”, MSGSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2017; 1 (15): 15-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  71. Kaygusuz, Canani (2008), Yaşlılık Kuramları, Psikolojik, Sosyal ve Bedensel Açıdan Yaşlılık, (Ankara: Pegem Akademi). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  72. Köroğlu, Muhammet Ali, Köroğlu, Cemile Zehra (2016), “Değişen Yaşlılık Olgusu ve İslami Perspektiften Değerlendirilmesi”, The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, Number: 248, 229-240. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  73. Kuhlman, Beatrice G., Kornadt Anna E., Bayen Ute J., Meuser Katherina, Wulff Liliane (2017), “Multi dimensionality of Younger and Older Adults' Age Stereotypes: The Interaction of Life Domain and Adjective Dimension”, Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychologica Sciences and Social Sciences, V: 72, No: 3, 436-440. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  74. Macionis, John J. (2012), Sosyoloji, Çeviri Editörü: Vildan Akan, (Nobel Yayınları). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  75. Onur, B. (1991), Gelişim Psikolojisi, Yetişkinlik,Yaşlılık, Ölüm, (Ankara: V Yayınları). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  76. Öz, Fatma; “Yaşamın Son Evresi: Yaşlılık Psikososyal Açıdan Gözden Geçirme”, Kriz Dergisi 10 (2), 17-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  77. Özdemir, Ö. (2009). Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Yaşlı Ayrımcılığına İlişkin Tutumları. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  78. Özmen, Şule Yüksel (2013), “Türk Kültüründe Yaşlının Yeri ve Medyayla Yaşlılığın Değişen Konumu”, Milli Folklor, Sayı: 100, 110-119. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  79. Şenol, Dolunay, Erdem, Sezgin (2017), “Yaşlılık ve Yaşlı Kadınlarda Huzurevi Algısı: Nitel Bir Araştırma”, Uluslararası Halk Kültüründe Aile Sempozyumu, Cilt: 7, Sayı: 2, 31-50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  80. Taşçı, Faruk (2013), Refah Devleti Modelleri İçinde Türkiye’nin Pozisyonu; “Yaşlı Algısı Üzerinden Değerlendirmeler”, İnsan ve Toplum 3 (5), 5-35. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  81. Uğurol, Y. (1993), Aile İçi Yaşlılara Karşı Psikolojik Tutumlar ve Psikolojik Sonuçları, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trabzon. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  82. Uluocak, Şeref, Aslan, Cumhur, Bakar, Coşkun, Gökulu, Gökhan, Bilir, Olgun (2013), Çanakkale Yaşlı Atlası: Çanakkale Kent Merkezinde Yaşayan 65 Yaş ve Üzeri Kişilerin Sosyo-Kültürel, Demografik, Ekonomik Özellikleri ile Sağlık Durumları ve Yaşam Kalitesi, Çanakkale: Çanakkale Olay Gazetesi Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  83. Vefikuluçay, Duygu (2008). Üniversitede Öğrenim Gören Öğrencilerin Yaşlı Ayrımcılığına İlişkin Tutumları. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  84. Yıldız, Recep, Ömeroğlu, Gözde, Terim, Nur (2017), “Yaşlı Penceresinden Yaşlı Ayrımcılığı: Bursa ve Yalova Örneği”, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), Cilt 3, Sayı 2, 313-329. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  85. Zengin, Melis Oktuğ (2015), Televizyonda Yaşlı Temsilleri ve Yaşçılık. İlk Baskı, (İstanbul: Kriter Yayınları). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  86. Web Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  87. Arpacı, Fatma (2005). Farklı boyutlarıyla aşlılık. Ankara: Türkiye İşçi Emeklileri Derneği,https://docplayer.biz.tr/1116998-Turkiye-isci-emeklileri-dernegi-farkli-boyutlariyla-yas-lilik-dr-fatma-arpaci.html, Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  88. Aydemir, Aslı. Yaşçılık, <http://kaosgl.org/sayfa.php?id=26333>, Erişim Tarihi: 29.01.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  89. Calasanti, Toni (2004), Feminist Gerontology and Old Men, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59 (6), <https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology/article/59/6/S305/589722> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  90. Demir, Ömer (2017), Sosyal Bilimler Sözlüğü, <http://omer-demir.net/sosyal-bilimler-sozlugu/>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  91. Dönümcü, Şadiye. “Yaşlılıkta Üretmek: Kendini Sürekli Yeniden Yaratmak.” <http://www.sosyalhizmetuzmani.org/yasliureten.htm> (02.08.2017). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  92. Esendemir; Şerif, Türkiye'de Yaşlı ve Yaşlılık Algısı, <http://www.gonuldergisi.com/turkiyede-yasli-ve-yaslilik-algisi-sosyolog-ve-uyg-gerontolog-yrd-doc-dr-serif-esendemir.html>, Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  93. Iversen, Nicolaj Thomas, Larsen, Lars, Solem, Per Erik (2012), A Conceptual Analysis of Ageism, ISSN: 1901-2276 (Print) 1904-0016 (Online) Journal homepage: <https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rnpy20>, 4-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  94. İnce, Abdullah (2017), “Değer” ile “Sorun” Arasında Türkiye’de Yaşlılarla İlgili Toplumsal Değer Yargıları (Din Bilimleri Perspektifinden Bir İnceleme), 83-112. <http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/388451>, Erişim Tarihi: 23.03.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  95. Sarı, Mustafa; Soyka Sözü Hakkında, 99-106. www.tdk.gov.tr/images/css/TDA/2004_1_07Sari.pdf <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/images/css/TDA/2004_1_07Sari.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi: 23.04.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  96. Tufan, İsmail, Nesne Olarak Yaşlılık ve Yaşlı İnsan, 1-2. file:///C:/Users/MSI-6/Desktop/YAªÇILIK%20MAKALESİ/nesnolyaslvinsn.pdf <file:///C:/Users/MSI-6/Desktop/YAŞÇILIK%20MAKALESİ/nesnolyaslvinsn.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi: 25. 04.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  97. Walt, Alex (2004). ‘The Treatment of Age and Age Discrimination in Employment in the United States, Canada and South Africa’, Elder Law Review, <http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ElderLawRw/2004/9.html> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  98. <https://www.uludagsozluk.com/k/sabunluk/... sabunluk <https://www.uludagsozluk.com/k/sabunluk/...%20sabunluk>> “Sabunluk” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  99. <http://www.meydansozluk.com/bak/sabunluk>, “Sabunluk” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  100. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.5caf1b3e1659e4.04865722> “Hortlamak Maddesi”, Erişim Tarihi: 15.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  101. <https://tr.wiktionary.org/wiki/K%C3%B6%C5%9Fe_ta%C5%9F%C4%B1_k%C3%B6%C5%9Fede_yak%C4%B1%C5%9F%C4%B1r>, “Köşe Taşı” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 15.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  102. <https://www.uludagsozluk.com/k/sabunluk/>, “Sabunluk” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  103. <http://www.meydansozluk.com/bak/sabunluk>, “Sabunluk” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  104. <https://kelimeler.net/Porsuk-kelimesinin-anlami-nedir>, “Porsuk” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  105. https://www.derszamani.net/mezar-kackini-deyiminin-anlami.html, “Mezar <https://www.derszamani.net/mezar-kackini-deyiminin-anlami.html,%20> Kaçkını” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  106. <https://www.huzursayfasi.com/deyimler-sayfasi/26556-mezar-kackini-deyiminin-anlami-s1.html>, “Mezar Kaçkını” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  107. <https://eksisozluk.com/soyka--130743>, “Soyka” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 18.03.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  108. <http://www.sozce.com/nedir/287132-soyka-kalmak>, “Soyka” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 18.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  109. <https://kelimeler.gen.tr/soyka-nedir-ne-demek-280147>, “Soyka” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 18.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  110. <https://kelimeler.gen.tr/marat-nedir-ne-demek-216052>, “Marat” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  111. <https://eksisozluk.com/herif--69045>, “Herif” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  112. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&kelime=HER%C4%B0F>, “Herif” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  113. <https://eksisozluk.com/sebek--44188>, “Şebek” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  114. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&kelime=%C5%9EEBEK>, “Şebek” Maddesi, Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  115. <https://www.uludagsozluk.com/k/modas%C4%B1-ge%C3%A7mi%C5%9F/>, “Modası Geçmiş” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  116. <https://www.nedirnedemek.com/modas%C4%B1-ge%C3%A7mi%C5%9F-ne-demek>, “Modası Geçmiş” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  117. https://www.dersimiz.com/deyimler_sozlugu.asp?islem=bilgigoster&iHYPERLINK "https://www.dersimiz.com/deyimler_sozlugu.asp?islem=bilgigoster&id=1923" d=1923 <https://www.dersimiz.com/deyimler_sozlugu.asp?islem=bilgigoster&iHYPERLINK%20>, “Modası Geçmiş” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  118. <https://eksisozluk.com/ihtiyar-heyeti--32947>, “İhtiyar Heyeti” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  119. <https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabut>, “Tabut” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  120. <https://eksisozluk.com/tabut--56606>, “Tabut” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  121. <https://eksisozluk.com/bitik--406741>, “Bitik” Maddesi, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  122. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&kelime=B%C4%B0T%C4%B0K>, “Bitik” Maddesi, 21.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  123. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_ttas&view=ttas&kategori1=derlay&kelime1=ems%C3%BCz>, “Emsiz” Maddesi, 21.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  124. <http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_bts&view=bts&kategori1=veritbn&kelimesec=177563>, “Kahırdak” Maddesi, 21.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  125. <https://eksisozluk.com/curuk--57702?p=2>, “Çürük” Maddesi, 21.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  126. <https://www.nedir.com/naylon>, “Naylon” Maddesi, 21.03.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-45
  127. Barnes, Elizabeth (2016), Minority Body: A Theory of Disability (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  128. Davis, Lennard J (1997), “Visualizing the Disabled Body: The classical Nude and the Fragmented Torso,” Mariam Fraser and Monica Greco (Eds), The Body: A Reader (London and New York: Routledge): 167-81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  129. Davis, Lennard J (2006), “Constructing Normalcy: The Bell Curve, the Novel, and the Invention of the Disabled in the Nineteenth Century,” Lennard J. Davis (Ed), The Disability Studies Reader: Second Edition (London and New York: Routledge): 3-5. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  130. Emens, Elizabeth F (2013), “Disabling Attitudes: U.S. Disability Law and ADA Amendments Act,” Lennard J. Davis (Ed), The Disability Studies Reader: Fourth Edition (London and New York: Routledge): 42-57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  131. Fraser Mariam and Monica Greco (2005), Introduction, Mariam Fraser and Monica Greco (Eds), The Body: A Reader (London and New York: Routledge): 1-42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  132. Grosz, Elizabeth (1994), “Refiguring Bodies,” Mariam Fraser and Monica Greco (Eds), The Body: A Reader (London and New York: Routledge): 47-51. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  133. Martiny, Kristian Moltke (2015), “How to Develop a Phenomenological Model of Disability,” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal 18:4 (553-65). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  134. Saxton, Marsha (2006), “Disability Rights and Selective Abortion,” Lennard J. Davis (Ed), The Disability Studies Reader: Second Edition (London and New York: Routledge): 105-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  135. Shakespeare, Tom (1996), “Disability, Identity, Difference,” Colin Barnes and Geof Mercer (Eds), Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability (Leeds: Disability Press): 94-113. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  136. Wasserman, David et al. (2016), “Disability: Definitions, Models, Experience.” <<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/disability/>> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  137. Williamson, Bess (2015). “Access.” Rachel Adams, Benjamin Reiss, and David Serlin (Eds), Keywords for Disability Studies (New York and London: New York University Press): 53-9. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-65
  138. Agamben, Giorgio (2005), The State of Exception, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  139. ARC- Asylum Research Consultancy (2017), “Turkey: Country Report - Update”, <https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/1325304/1226_1486117831_5890c8d84.pdf>, Access: 02.05.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  140. Bezci, Bünyamin (2006), Carl Schmitt’ in Politik Felsefesi: Modern Devletin Müdafası, (İstanbul: Paradigma Yayıncılık). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  141. Demir, Tarık (2017), “Ben ve Öteki İlişkisi Işığında Savaş Olgusu”, Dürüst, Çiğdem et.al (ed.), Uluslararası Savaş ve Kültür Sempozyumu, (Ankara: Kıbatek). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  142. Denli, Özlem (2017), “Hosting the Nation: Populist Themes in Erdoğan’s Muhtar Meetings, Öztürk, Armağan and Bilgin, Ayhan Bilgin (ed.), The Transformation of Public Sphere: An Interdisciplinary Debate about the Recent Development of Publicity in Turkey, (Baden-Baden: Nomos), pp. 135-148. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  143. Draghici, Simona (2001), “Preface”, State, Movement, People: The Triadic Structure of the Political Unity, (Corvallis: Plutarch Press), pp. vi- xxiv. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  144. Hirst, Paul (1999), “Carl Schmitt’s Decisionism”, Mouffe, Chantal (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, (London: Verso), pp. 38-53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  145. Kalyvas, Andreas (2008), Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  146. Mouffe, Chantal (2009).The Democratic Paradox, (London: Verso). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  147. Mouffe, Chantal (1999), “Carl Schmitt and the Paradox of Liberal Democracy”,Mouffe, Chantal (ed.), The Challenge of Carl Schmitt, (London: Verso), pp. 38-53. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  148. Öztürk, Armağan (2017), “Schmitt’ in Liberalliği”, FelsefeArkivi, Vol.1, No: 46, pp.71-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  149. Schmitt, Carl (2008), Constitutional Theory, (Durham: Duke University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  150. Schmitt, Carl (2007), The Concept of the Political, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  151. Schmitt, Carl (2005), Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  152. Schmitt, Carl (2001), State, Movement, People: The Triadic Structure of the Political Unity, (Corvallis: Plutarch Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  153. Schwaab, George (2007), “Introduction”, The Concept of the Political, (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 3-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  154. Sluga, Hans (2009), “The Pluralism of the Political: From Carl Schmitt to Hannah Arendt”, Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia, Vol:4, No:1, pp. 43-58.http://www.truthandpower.com/the-pluralism-of-the-political-from-carl-schmitt-to-hannah-arendt/#_ednref28 <http://www.truthandpower.com/the-pluralism-of-the-political-from-carl-schmitt-to-hannah-arendt/>, Access: 15.04.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  155. Türk, Duygu (2013), Öteki, Düşman, Olay: Levinas, Schmitt ve Badiou’da Etik ve Siyaset, (İstanbul: Metis Yayınları). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  156. Vatter, Miguel (2014), “The Political Theology of Carl Schmitt, Oxford Handbooks Online, <https://www.academia.edu/10171620/The_Political_Theology_of_Carl_Schmitt?auto=download>, Access: 17.04.2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-75
  157. Agamben, Giorgio (2015). Stasis, çev. J. Gayraud, (Paris: Editions Points) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  158. Barbusse, Henri (2014), Le Feu (Journal d'une escouade), (Paris: GF Flammarion) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  159. Chaliand, Gérard (2009), Une histoire mondiale de la guerre, (Paris: Odile Jacob) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  160. Clausewitz, Carl von (2015), De la Guerre, çev. Nicolas Waquet, (Paris: Rivages) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  161. Cumin, David (2009). "La Théorie du Partisan de Carl Schmitt", Institut de Stratégie Comparée, Stratégique, N° 93-94-95-96 | pp 31 à 71. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  162. de la Grange, Arnaud, & Balencie Jean-Marc (2011) Les guerres bâtardes. Comment l'Occident perd les batailles du XXIe siècle, (Paris: Perrin) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  163. Gros, Frédéric (2006), États de Violence, Essai sur la fin de la guerre, (Paris: Gallimard) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  164. Kardeş, M. Ertan (2015). Schmitt'le Birlikte Schmitt'e Karşı. Politik Felsefe açısından Carl Schmitt ve Düşüncesi, (İstanbul: İletişim). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  165. Kardeş, M. Ertan (2019).Yönsüzleşmiş Savaşlar Politik Felsefenin Bir Sınır Meselesi Olarak Savaşa Dair [Disoriented Wars, War as a Limit Problem of Political Philosophy], (İstanbul: Pinhan). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  166. Liang, Qiao & Xiangsui, Wang (2014). La guerre hors limites, çev. H. Denès, (Paris: Rivages) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  167. Münkler, Herfried (2010). Yeni Savaşlar, çev. Z. A. Yılmazer, (İstanbul: İletişim). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  168. Ninon, Grangé (2013), " Carl Schmitt, Ernst Jünger et le spectre de la guerre civile. L'individu, le "soldat", l'État" in Carl Schmitt, Nomos, droit et conflit dans les relations internationales, sous la direction Ninon Grangé, (Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  169. Platon (2007), Devlet, çev. S. Eyüboğlu, M. Ali Cimcoz, (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  170. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (2008). Principes du droit de la guerre, Écrits sur la paix perpétuelle, ed.ler B. Bachofen & Céline Spector (Paris: Vrin) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  171. Schmitt, Carl (1988). "Neutralität und Neutralisierungen", in Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  172. Schmitt, Carl (1991). Glossarium, Aufzeichnungen der Jahre 1947-1951, Herausgegeben von Eberhard Freiherr von Medem, (Berlin: Dunker &Humblot) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  173. Schmitt, Carl (1992). La Notion de Politique, suivie de Théorie du Partisan, trad. Marie-Louise Steinhauser, (Paris: Flammarion). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  174. Schmitt, Carl (1994). Das internationalrechtliche Verbrechen des Angriffskrieges und der Grundsatz „Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine lege“, Herausgegeben, mit Anmerkungen und einem Nachwort versehen von Helmut Quaritz, (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  175. Schmitt, Carl (1995). " Die letzte globale Linie", in Staat, Großraum, Nomos, Arbeiten aus den Jahren 1916-1969, Herausgegeben, mit einem Vorwort und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Günter Maschke, (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  176. Schmitt, Carl (1997). Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum, (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  177. Schmitt, Carl (2001). Le Nomos de la terre dans le droit des gens du jus publicum europaeum, trad. Lilyane Deroche-Gurcel, (Paris: Presses Universitaire de France). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  178. Schmitt, Carl (2002). Le Léviathan dans la doctrine de l’État de Thomas Hobbes, Sens et échec d’un symbole politique, çev. Denis Trierweiler, (Paris: Éd. du Seuil). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  179. Schmitt, Carl.(2003a).Die Wendung zum diskriminierenden Kriegsbegriff, (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  180. Schmitt, Carl.(2003b). Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes, Sinn und Fehlschlag eines politischen Symbols, (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  181. Schmitt, Carl (2005). Frieden oder Pazifismus, Arbeiten zum Völkerrecht und zur internationalen Politik 1924 1978, Herausgegeben, mit einem Vorwort und mit Anmerkungen versehen von Günter Maschke, (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  182. Schmitt, Carl (2006). Theorie des Partisanen. Zwischenbemerkung zum Begriff des Politischen, (Berlin: Dunker & Humblot) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  183. Schmitt, Carl(2007). La guerre civile mondiale, Essais (1943-1978), trad. C. Jouin, (Paris: Éditions Ère). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  184. Toffler, Alvin & Toffler, Heidi (1994) Guerre et contre-guerre: survivre à l'aube du XXIe siècle, çev. Pierre-Emmanuel Dauzat (Paris: Fayard) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  185. Waltz, N. Kenneth (2001), Man, The State and War, A Theoretical Analysis, (New York: Columbia University Press) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-91
  186. Akal, Cemal Bali (2005). Devlet Kuramı [State Theory], Ankara: Dost Kitabevi. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  187. Arendt, Hannah (2003). Şiddet Üzerine [On Violence], İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  188. Atatüre, Süha (2001). Küreselleşme Sürecinin Ulus Devlet Üzerine Etkileri [The effects of the globalization process over the nation state], Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gazi University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  189. Atatüre, Süha (2016). “Tyranny of Nation State”, Turkish Political Quarterly, Volume 14 Winter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  190. AUGUR, (2008). The Role and Structure of Civil Society Organizations in National and Global Governance Challenges for Europe in the world in 2030, Project no. SSH-CT-2009-244565, Collaborative Project, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  191. Davies, Thomas (2013). NGO’s A New History of Transnational Civil Society, (London: C. Hurst & Co Ltd). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  192. Falk, Richard (2005). Dünya Düzeni Nereye/The Declining World Order, Çev. Neşenur Domaniç, Nusret Arhan, İstanbul: MetisYayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  193. Guibernau, Montserrat (1997). Milliyetçilikler [Nationalism], İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  194. Held, David ve McGrew, Anthony (2007). Globalization Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  195. Jackson, Robert (2013). Global Politics in The 21st Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  196. Keene, Edward (2002). Beyond the Anarchical Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  197. Kaldor, Mary (2005). Global Civil Society, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  198. Lebow Ned, Richard (2010). Why Nation Fight, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  199. Oran, Baskın (2018). Etnik ve Dinsel Azınlıklar/ Ethnic and Religious Minorities, Ankara: Literatür. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  200. Morgentau, Hans (1993). Politics Among Nations: the Struggle For Power and Peace, The McGraw-Hill Companies. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  201. Murithi Tim, Archibugi Daniel, Koenig Mathias (2012). Global Democracy, Toward the Metamorphosis of the United Nations: a proposal for establishing global democracy, New York: Cambridge Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  202. Poggi, Gianfranco (1978). The Development of the Modern State, California: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  203. Show, Martin (1994). Global Society and International Relations, Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  204. Vicencio, Charles Villa (2000). Christianity and Human Rights, Journal of Law and Religion, Vol.14, No.2. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-101
  205. Ağralı, E. (2015). The Concept of European Citizenship and Its Evolution. İstanbul: T.C. Marmara University Institute of European Union Department of European Union Law. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  206. Altınbaş, D. (2009). Avrupa Birliği'nin Başarısız Girşimi: Avrupa Yurttaşlığı. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11 (3), 93-112. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  207. Bach, I., & George, S. (2006). Politics in the European Union (Second Edition ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  208. Bellamy, R., Castiglione, D., & Shaw, J. (2006). Introduction: From National to Transnational Citizenship. In R. Bellamy, D. Castiglione, & J. Shaw, Making European Citizens Civic Inclusion in a Transnational Context (pp. 1-28). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  209. Blanchet, T. (2016). From Workers to Citizens The Evolution of European Citizenship. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 7 (2), 142-150. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  210. Borgmann-Prebil, Y., & Ross, M. (2013). The Principle of Equality and Citizenship of the Union. In H.-J. Blanke, & S. Mangiameli, The Treaty on European Union (TEU) A Commentary (pp. 389-415). London: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  211. Ciongaru, E. (2016). The Citizenship of European Union - Diverstiy in Unity or Unity in Diversity. Journal of Law and Administrative Sciences (5), 11-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  212. Commission of the European Communities. (1985). Report from the ad hoc Committee on a People's Europe -Bulletin of the EC 3-1985. Brussel: Commission of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  213. Council of the European Union. (1993). Council Directive 93/109/EC of 6 December 1993. Official Journal of the European Communities, 34-38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  214. Council of the European Union. (1994, 12 31). Council Directive 94/80/EC of 19 December 1994. Official Journal of the European Communities (No L 368/46). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  215. Council of the European Union. (2013). Council Directive 2013/1/EU of 20 December 2012. Official Journal of the European Union, 27-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  216. Council of the European Union. (2015). Council Directive (EU) 2015/637 of 20 April 2015. Official Journal of the European Union, L106/1 - L106/13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  217. Crowley, J. (1999). Some Thoughts on Theorizing European Citizenship. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 12(4), 471-488. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  218. EUR-Lex. (2015). EU Freedom of Movement and Residence. Retrieved 13.08.2019, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum:l33152 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  219. European Commission. (2015). Flash Eurobarometer 430 Report European Union Citizenship. European Union. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  220. European Commission. (2018). Standard Eurobarometer 89 Report European citizenship. Brussels: European Union. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  221. European Commission. (2019). Consular protection outside the EU. Retrieved 15.08.2019, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/eu-citizenship/consular-protection_en Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  222. European Council. (2019). Consular protection. Retrieved 15.08.2019, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/consular-protection/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  223. European Ombudsman. (2019). Retrieved 15.08.2019, from How can the Ombudsman help?: https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/how-can-the-ombudsman-help Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  224. European Parliament. (1979). Proceedings of the Round Table on 'Special rights and a charter of the rights of the citizens of the European Community' and related documents, Florence 26 to 28 October 1978. Luxembourg: European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  225. European Parliament. (2019 b). The Citizens of the Union and Their Rights. Fact Sheets on the European Union. European Parliament. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  226. European Parliament. (2019 c). The right to petition. Retrieved 15.08.2019, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/148/the-right-of-petition Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  227. European Parliament. (2019). MEPs European Parliament. Retrieved 15.08.2019, from http://europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  228. European Union. (2010). Consolidated Treaties Charter of Fundamental Rights. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  229. European Union. (2019). EU Citizenship. Retrieved 08.08.2019, from https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/eu-citizenship_en Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  230. General Secretariat of the Council and of the Commission. (1992). Treaty on European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  231. Gerim, G. (2017). Çağdaş Yurttaşliği Kavramak: Temel Yaklaşimlar, Yeni Boyutlar ve Yeni Bir Yurttaşlik Çerçevesi. Sosyoloji Konferansları - Istanbul Journal of Sociological Studies, 2 (56), 155-182. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  232. Günuğur, H. (2007). Avrupa Birliği'nin Hukuk Düzeni. Ankara: EKO Avrupa Ekonomik Danışma Merkezi. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  233. Horspool, M. (2012). The Concept of Citizenship in the European Union. In H.-J. Blanke, & S. Mangiameli, The European Union after Lisbon Constitutional Basis, Economic Order and External Action (pp. 279-294). London: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  234. Hurrelmann, A. (2007, May). European Democracy, the Permissive Consensus' and the Collapse of the EU Constitution. European Law Journal, 13 (7), 343-359. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  235. Isin, E. F., & Nyers, P. (2014). Introduction: Globalizing Citizenship Studies. In E. F. Isin, & P. Nyers, Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  236. Kostakopoulou, D. (2008). The Evolution of European Union Citizenship. European Political Science, 285-295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  237. Kymlicka, W., & Norman, W. (1994, Jan.). eturn of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory. Ethics, 104 (2), 352-381. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  238. Laursen, F. (2012). The Treaty of Maastricht. In E. Jones, A. Menon, & S. Weatherill, The Oxford Handbook of the European Union (pp. 121-134). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  239. Maas, W. (2005). The Genesis of European Rights. JCMS, 43 (5), 1009-1025. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  240. Maas, W. (2014). European Union Citizenship in Retrospect and Prospect. In E. F. Isin, & P. Nyers, Routledge Handbook of Global Citizenship Studies (pp. 409-417). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  241. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class and other essays. Cambridge: The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  242. Martiniello, M. (2018). The Development of European Citizenship: A Critical Evaluation. In M. Rochel, & R. V. Berkel, European Citizenship and Social Exclusion. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  243. Mindus, P. (2017). European Citizenship after Brexit Freedom of Movement and Rights of Residence. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  244. Olsen, E. D. (2008). The Origins of European Citizenship in the first two Decades of European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 15 (1), 40-57. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  245. Samur, H. (2012). AB Yurttaşlığının İlk Yirmi Yılının Değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, 8 (30), 93-123. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  246. Scully, R. (2003). The European Parliament. In M. Cini, European Union Politics (pp. 166-178). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  247. Shaw, J. (1997). European Citizenship: The IGC and Beyond. European Integration online Papers, 1 (3), 1-23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  248. Tekinalp, G. (2000). (Tekinalp/Tekinalp) AB Hukuku. İstanbul: Beta. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  249. Tindemans, L. (1976). European Union Report by Mr Leo Tindemans, Prime Minister of Belgium, to the European Council. European Communities Commission. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  250. Üstel, F. (1999). Yurttaşlık ve Demokrasi. Ankara: Dost Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  251. Wæver, O. (1995). Identity, Integration and Security: Solving the Sovereignty Puzzle in E.U. Studies. Journal of International Affairs, Transcending National Boundaries 48 (2), 389-431. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-113
  252. Addis, Adeno (2009), “Deliberative Democracy in Severely Fractured Societies”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, (16): 59-83. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  253. Benhabib, Seyla (1996), “The Democratic Moment and the Problem of Difference”, Benhabib, Seyla (Der.), Democracy and Difference, (New Jersey: Princeton University Press): 3-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  254. Doorenspleet, Renske (2019), Rethinking the Value of Democracy (Cham: Palgrave Macmillian). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  255. Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms (Massachusetts: The MIT Press), (Trans. William Rehg). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  256. Held, David (2006), Models of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  257. Hobbes, Thomas (1651), Leviathan (London: The Green Dragon). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  258. Kant, Immanuel (1997), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (New York: Cambridge University Press), (Trans., Mary Gregor). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  259. Kant, Immanuel (1991), The Metaphysics of Morals (New York: Cambridge University Press), (Trans., Mary Gregor). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  260. Kymlicka, Will (2003), Multicultural Citizenship (New York: Oxford University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  261. Locke, John (1988), Two Treatises of Government, Laslett, Peter (Der.), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  262. Machiavelli, Niccolo (1883), Discourses On The First Decade Of Titus Livius (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co.), (Trans., Ninian Hill Thomson). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  263. Marri, Anand R. (2010), “Multicultural Democracy: Toward a Better Democracy”, Intercultural Education, 14 (3): 263-277. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  264. Mouffe, Chantal (2013), Agonistics. Thinking The World Politically (New York: Verso). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  265. Mouffe, Chantal (2000), The Democratic Paradox (New York: Verso). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  266. Rancière, Jacques (2014), The Hatred of Democracy (London: Verso), (Trans. Steve Corcoran). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  267. Rousseau, J. J. (1994), The Social Contract (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press), (Trans. Christopher Betts). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-127
  268. ARENDT, Hannah (2003). Şiddet Üzerine, Trans: Bülent Peker, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  269. ARENDT, Hannah (2009). İnsanlık Durumu, Trans: Bahadır Sina Şener, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  270. ARENDT, Hannah (2012a). Geçmişle Gelecek Arasında, Trans.: Bahadır Sina Şener, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  271. ARENDT, Hannah (2012b). Devrim Üzerine, Trans: Onur Eylül Kara, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  272. ARENDT, Hannah (2012c). Kötülüğün Sıradanlığı, Trans: Özge Çelik, İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  273. ARENDT, Hannah (2014a). Totalitarizmin Kaynakları 1, Antisemitizm, Trans: Bahadır Sina Şener, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  274. ARENDT, Hannah (2014b). Totalitarizmin Kaynakları 2, Emperyalizm, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  275. BAĞCE, H. Emre ve Armağan Öztürk (2008). “Aristoteles Versus Hegel: Antik Bilgeliğin Çarpıtılması Üzerine Notlar”, Liberal Düşünce, 13 (51-2), pp. 157-173. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  276. BARBER, Benjamin (1995). Güçlü Demokrasi, Trans: Mehmet Beşikçi, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  277. BENHABİB, Seyla (1992). “Model of the Public Space: Hannah Arendt, Liberal Tradition and Jurgen Habermas”, Habermas and Public Sphere, (Ed.), Craig Calhoun, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, pp. 72-98. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  278. BENHABİB, Seyla (1999). “Giriş: Demokratik Moment ve Farklılık Sorunu”, Trans: Zeynep Gürata & Cem Gürsel, (Ed.), Seyla Benhabib, Demokrasi ve Farklılık, Siyasal Düzenin Sınırlarının Tartışmaya Açılması, İstanbul: Demokrasi Kitaplığı, pp. 1-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  279. BOTTOMORE, Tom (2013). Frankfurt Okulu ve Eleştirisi, Trans: Ümit Hüsrev Yolsal, İstanbul: Say Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  280. ÇELEBİ, Aykut (2004). “Kamusal Alan ve Sivil Toplum: Siyasal Bir Değerlendirme”, (Ed.), Meral Özbek, Kamusal Alan. İstanbul: Hil Yayınları, pp. 237-284 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  281. ÇİĞDEM, Ahmet (2004a). “Kamusal Alan, Kamusal Din ve Kamusal Akıl”, (Der.), Meral Özbek, Kamusal Alan, İstanbul: Hil Yayınları, pp. 501-514. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  282. ÇİĞDEM, Ahmet (2004b). Bir İmkân Olarak Modernite, Weber ve Habermas, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  283. ÇİĞDEM, Ahmet, (2008). Akıl ve Toplumun Özgürleşmesi, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  284. CONSTANT, Benjamin (1998). “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns”, Political Writings, Trans: Biancamaria Fontana, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 309-328. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  285. FRAZER, Nancy (2004). “Kamusal Alanı Yeniden Düşünmek: Gerçekte Var olan Demokrasinin Eleştirisine Bir Katkı”, (Der.), Meral Özbek, Kamusal Alan, İstanbul: Hil Yayınları, pp. 103-132. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  286. GEUSS, Raymond (2000). Eleştirel Teori, Trans: Ferda Keskin, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  287. HABERMAS, Jürgen (1981). Knowledge and Human Interests, Trans: Jeremy Schapiro, Londra: Heinemann. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  288. HABERMAS, Jürgen (1993). “İdeoloji” Olarak Teknik ve Bilim, Trans: Mustafa Tüzel, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  289. HABERMAS, Jürgen (1999). “Demokrasinin Üç Normatif Modeli”, Trans: Zeynep Gürata & Cem Gürsel, (Ed.), Seyla Benhabib, Demokrasi ve Farklılık, Siyasal Düzenin Sınırlarının Tartışmaya Açılması, İstanbul: Demokrasi Kitaplığı, pp. 37-50. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  290. HABERMAS, Jürgen (2001). İletişimsel Eylem Kuramı, Trans: Mustafa Tüzel, İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  291. HABERMAS, Jürgen (2004).“Kamusal Alan”, (Der.), Meral Özbek, Kamusal Alan, İstanbul: Hil Yayınları, pp. 95-102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  292. HABERMAS, Jürgen (2005).Kamusallığın Yapısal Dönüşümü, Trans: Tanıl Bora ve Mithat Sancar, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  293. HEGEL, G. W. F. (1991). Hukuk Felsefesinin Prensipleri, Trans: Cenap Karakaya, İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  294. İREM, Nazım (2006). “Radikalleştirilmiş Aydınlanma Projesi Kıyısında Entelektüeller ve Jurgen Habermas”, Doğu Batı 35, pp. 209-231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  295. KAHRAMAN, Hasan Bülent (2002-3). “Post-Fenomenolojik Devlet Tasavvuru: Hegelci ve Arendtçi Kısıtlamalar ve Yeni Bir Sivil Toplum İnşa Olanağı”, Doğu Batı 21, pp. 45-60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  296. KARADAĞ, Ahmet (2003). “Kamusal Alan Modelleri: Çoğulcu Perspektiften Bir Değerlendirme”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 58 (3), pp. 172-195. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  297. KEANE, John (1993). “Despotizm ve Demokrasi: Sivil Toplum ile Devlet Arasındaki Ayrımın Kökenleri ve Gelişimi 1750-1850”, (Der.), John Keane, Sivil Toplum ve Devlet, Avrupa’da Yeni Yaklaşımlar, Trans: Levent Köker, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları, pp. 47-90. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  298. KLUGE, Alexander ve Oscar Negt (2018). Kamusallık ve Tecrübe: Burjuva ve Proleter Kamausallığın Analizine Doğru, Ankara: Notabene Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  299. KÖKER, Levent (1998). İki Farklı Siyaset, Ankara: Vadi Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  300. LEKESIZALIN, Ferma (2004). “Habermas’ın İdeoloji Eleştirisi ve Postyapısalcı Cyborg’a İlişkin Bir Soruşturma”, Doğu Batı 28, pp. 144-161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  301. NEOCLEOUS, Mark (2012). Güvenlik, Şiddet ve Savaş, Trans: Gül Çorbacıoğlu ve Ersin Embel, Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  302. O’SULLIVAN, Noel (1994). “Eski Yunan Özlemi ve Endüstri Toplumu”, Çağdaş Siyaset Felsefecileri, (Ed.), A. De Crespigny ve K. R. Mingoue, Trans.: Gülayşe Koçak, İstanbul: Remiz Yayınları, pp.223-245. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  303. ÖZBANK, Murat (2009). Neden Demokrasi? Nasıl İstikrar? Rawls-Habermas Tartışması, (Ed.), Murat Özbank, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  304. ÖZBEK, Meral (2004). “Giriş: Kamusal Alanın Sınırları”, (Der.), Meral Özbek, Kamusal Alan, İstanbul: Hil Yayınları, pp. 19-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  305. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2008). “Cumhuriyetçilik Ayracında Yurtsever Anlayışın İdeolojik Kökleri”, (Der.), Nafız Tok, Cumhuriyetçilik, Ankara: Orian Yayınları, pp. 119-138. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  306. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2010). “İki Liberalizm Teorisi ya da Liberalizmi Bölen Metodolojik-İdeolojik Ayraçlar Üzerine Bir Soruşturma”, (Der.), Armağan Öztürk, Yeni Sol Yeni Sağ, Ankara: Phoenix Yayınları, pp. 299-335. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  307. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2011). “John Stuart Mill ve Alexis de Tocqueville Felsefelerinde Sivil Özgürlükleri Koruma Kaygısı Üzerine Notlar”, Felsefe Tartışmaları 45, pp. 1-31. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  308. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2012a). Liberal Milliyetçilik ve Anti-Liberal Milliyetçilik. Kaos GL, 123, pp. 17-8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  309. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2012b). “Schumpeter, Sartori ve Dahl Özelinde Demokratik Elit Teorileri Perspektifi Üzerine Düşünceler”, Düşünen Siyaset 28, pp. 135-58. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  310. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2013). “Neo-Atina Cumhuriyetçiliği Özelinde Liberalizm: Komüniteryanizm Tartışması Üzerine Notlar”, Liberal Düşünce 71,pp. 93-106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  311. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2016). Cumhuriyetçilik ve Liberalizm, İstanbul: Doruk Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  312. ÖZTÜRK, Armağan (2018). ”Cumhuriyetçilik, Milliyetçilik, Atatürk Milliyetçiliği ve Yurtseverlik Kavramları Üzerine Kuramsal Bir Çerçeve Denemesi”, Uluslararası Medeniyet Çalışmaları Dergisi, 3 (1), pp. 369-388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  313. PHILIPS, Anne (1995). Demokrasinin Cinsiyeti, Trans: Alev Türker, İstanbul: Metis Yayınları Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  314. POGGI, Gianfranco (2005). Modern Devletin Gelişimi, Trans: Şule Kut ve Binnaz Toprak, İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  315. REIJEN, Willem Van (2006). "Aydınlanmanın Diyalektiğini Alegori Olarak Okumak", (Der.), H. Emre Bağce, Frankfurt Okulu, Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, pp. 167-188. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  316. ROUSSEAU, Jean Jacques (1987). Toplum Sözleşmesi, Trans.: Vedat Günyol, İstanbul:Adam Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  317. SENNETT, Richard (2002). Kamusal İnsanın Çöküşü, Trans: Serpil Durak ve Abdullah Yılmaz, İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  318. TATE, John William (1997). “Kant, Habermas and the Philosophical Legitimation of Modernity”, Journal of European Studies 27 (1), pp. 1-36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  319. TOK, Nafız (2013). “Liberal Milliyetçilik”, (Ed), Armağan Öztürk, Res Publica, Ankara: Doğu Batı Yayınları, pp. 266-285. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  320. TOURAINE, Alain (2002). Demokrasi Nedir? Trans: Olcay Kunal, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  321. UYGUN, Oktay (2003). Demokrasinin Tarihsel, Felsefi ve Ahlaki Boyutları, İstanbul: İnkılap Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  322. ÜSTEL, Füsun (1999). Yurttaşlık ve Demokrasi, Ankara: Dost Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  323. VINCENT, Andrew (2006). Modern Politik İdeolojiler, Trans: Arzu Tüfekçi, İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  324. YILDIRIM, Yılmaz (2016). Osmanlı Modernleşmesi ve Sivil Toplum, İstanbul: Tezkire Yayınları. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  325. YÜKSELBABA, Ülker (2008). “Kamusal Alan Modelleri ve Bu Modellerin Bağlamları”, İÜFFM, C. LXVI, Issue 2, pp. 227-272 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-139
  326. Bosia Michael J. and Meredith L. Weiss (2013), “Political Homophobia in Comparative Perspective”, Meredith L. Weiss and Michael J. Bosia (Ed), Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, (Illinois: University of Illinois Press):1-29. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  327. Bosia Michael J. (2013), “Why States Act: Homophobia and Crisis”, Meredith L. Weiss and Michael J. Bosia (Ed), Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, (Illinois: University of Illinois Press):30-54. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  328. Bronski, Michael (2011), A Queer History of the United States (Boston, Beacon Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  329. Butler, Judith (1993), “Critically Queer”, GLQ, (1): 17-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  330. Butler, Judith (2005), “Contagious Word: Paranoia and ‘Homosexuality’ in the Military”, Iain Morland and Annabelle Willox (Ed), Queer Theory, (London: Palgrave MacMillan): 142-157. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  331. D'Emilio, John (2014), In a New Century Essays on Queer History, Politics, and Community Life (Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  332. deLauretis, Theresa (1991),“Queer Theory: Lesbian and Gay Sexualities”, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 3, (2) (Summer 1991) iii-xviii. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  333. Enloe, Cynthia (2007), Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link (Plymouth, Rowman & Littlefield). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  334. Feinberg, Ayal, Regina Branton and Valerie Martinez-Ebers (2019), “Counties that hosted a 2016 Trump rally saw a 226 percent increase in hate crimes” <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/03/22/trumps-rhetoric-does-inspire-more-hate-crimes/?utm_term=.24638348c3ca> (23. 04. 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  335. Fone, Bryan (2001), Homophobia: A History (NY: Picador). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  336. Foucault, Michel (1990), History of Sexuality: Volume 1 (NY, Vintage). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  337. Halberstam, Jack (Judith) (2007), “Forgetting Family: Queer Alternatives to Oedipal Relations”, George E. Haggerty and Molly McGarry (Ed), A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies, (Massachusetts, Wiley Blackwell): 315-324. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  338. Halberstam, Jack (Judith) (2011), The Queer Art of Failure (Durham, Duke UP). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  339. Hall, Donald E. (2005), “A Brief, Slanted History of Homosexual Activity”, Iain Morland and Annabelle Willox (Ed), Queer Theory, (London: Palgrave MacMillan): 96-114. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  340. Hearn, Julie (2002), “The Invisible NGO: U.S. Evangelical Mission in Kenya,” Journal of Religion in Africa, (32): 32-60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  341. Human Rights Watch (2019), “Russia: New Wave of Anti-LGBT Persecution” https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/02/15/russia-new-wave-anti-lgbt-persecution <https://www.hrw.org/news/%202019/02/15/russia-new-wave-anti-lgbt-persecution> (01.07.2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  342. Jagose, Annamarie (1996), Queer Theory: An Introduction (Melbourne, Melbourne UP). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  343. Jakobsen, Janet R. (2007), “Sex, Secularism, and the War on Terror”, George E. Haggerty and Molly McGarry (Ed), A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies, (Massachusetts: Wiley Blackwell): 17-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  344. Johnson David K. (2013), “America’s Cold War Empire: Exporting the Lavender Scare”, Meredith L. Weiss and Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  345. Michael J. Bosia (Ed), Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, (Illinois: University of Illinois Press): 55-74. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  346. Kaoma Kapya J. (2013), “The Marriage of Convenience: The U.S. Christian Right, African Christianity, and Postcolonial Politics of Sexual Identity Meredith L. Weiss and Michael J. Bosia (Ed), Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, (Illinois: University of Illinois Press): 75-102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  347. Littauer, Amanda H. (2012), “‘Someone to Love’: Teen Girls’ Same-Sex Desire in the 1950s United States” Heike Bauer and Matt Cook (Ed.), Queer 1950s Rethinking Sexuality in the Postwar Years, (London, MacMillan): 61-76. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  348. Meyer, Amit (2019), “The Mideast's Stonewall? From Iraq to Morocco, the Fight for LGBTQ Rights Rages On”, <https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/.premium-the-mideast-s-stonewall-fight-for-lgbtq-rights-rages-on>.(13.07.2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  349. Mole, Richard (2018),“The Politics of Homophobia in Eastern Europe” ZOiS Spotlight https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/zois-spotlight-2018/the-politics-of-homophobia-in-eastern-europe/ <https://en.zois-berlin.de/%20publications/zois-spotlight-2018/the-politics-of-homophobia-in-eastern-europe/>(16 May 2018). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  350. O’Dwyer, Conor (2013), “Gay Rights and Political Homophobia in Postcommunist Europe: Is There an “EU Effect”?” Meredith L. Weiss and Michael J. Bosia (Ed), Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression, (Illinois: University of Illinois Press): 103-126. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  351. Ozkazanc, Alev. “Queer’in Siyasi Potansiyelleri Üzerine Düşünceler”, Kaos Q, 2014, (1): 83-90 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  352. Phillips, Tom and Anna Jean Kaiser. (2019). “Brazil must not become a 'gay tourism paradise', says Bolsonaro”<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/26/bolsonaro-accused-of-inciting-hatred-with-gay-paradise-comment> (10.07.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  353. Queer (2019), In dictionary.com retrieved from <https://www.dictionary.com/browse/queer> (01.07.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  354. Ritschel, Chelsea. (2019) “As Trump Administration Announces Gay Rights Campaign - here are eight anti-LGBT things the president has done” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/trump-homosexuality-lgbt-rights-gay-decriminalisation-campaign-administration-a8787446.html (14.06.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  355. Rubin, Gayle (2011), Deviations (Durham, Duke UP). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  356. Saeidzadeh, Zara (2014), The Legality of Sex Change Surgery and Construction of Transsexual Identity in Contemporary Iran. Unpublished MA Thesis, Lund University. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  357. Sedgwick, Eve K. (1993), Tendencies (Durham, N.C.: Duke UP). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  358. Serrano-Amaya, Jose Fernando (2018), Homophobic Violence in Armed Conflict and Political Transition (London: Palgrave MacMillan). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  359. Sleptcov, Nikita (2017), “Political Homophobia as a State Strategy in Russia”, Journal of Global Initiatives Vol. 12, (1): 140-161. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  360. Stevenson, Walter (1995), “The Rise of Eunuchs in Greco-Roman Antiquity”, Journal of the History of Sexuality, Vol. 5, (4): 495-511. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  361. Stout, David (2004), “Bush Backs Ban in Constitution on Gay Marriage”.https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/24/politics/bush-backs-ban-in-constitution-on-gay-marriage.html <https://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/24/%20politics/%20bush-backs-ban-in-constitution-on-gay-marriage.html> (14.05.2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  362. Thoreson, Ryan Richard (2014), “Troubling the Waters of a ‘wave of homophobia’: Political Economies of Anti-queer Animusin sub-Saharan Africa”, Sexualities, Vol. 17 (1/2): 23-42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  363. Yang, Daryl (2019), “Global Trends on the Decriminalization of Consensual Same-Sex Sexual Acts (1969 - 2019)”, Lucas Ramon Mendos (Ed), State Sponsored Homophobia https://ilga.org/downloads/ILGA_State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2019.pdf <https://ilga.org/downloads/ILGA_%20State_Sponsored_Homophobia_2019.pdf> (01.07.2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  364. Yee, Heng Yeh (2019), “LGBT Rights in South Asia: What Next?”,https://www.salzburgglobal.org/news/latest-news/article/lgbt-rights-in-south-asia-what-next.html (12.03. 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-163
  365. BARTHES, Roland. (2016), Göstergeler İmparatorluğu (İstanbul: YKY) (Çev: Tahsin Yücel) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  366. BARTHES, Roland. (2009), Göstergebilimsel Serüven. (İstanbul: YKY) (Çev: Mehmet Rifat-Sema Rifat) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  367. CORBALLİS, Michael C. (2002), From Hand To Mouth, (Princeton: Princeton University Press) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  368. DERRIDA, Jacques. (1981), Dissemination. (Londra Continuum Pres) (Çev: Barbara Johnson) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  369. JANSON, Tore. (2016), Dillerin Tarihi, (İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi) (Çev: Mehmet Doğan) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  370. LE BRETON, David. (2016), Bedene Veda, (İstanbul: Sel Yayıncılık) (Çev: Aziz UfukKılıç) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  371. SAUSSURE Ferdinand de. (1998), Genel Dilbilim Dersleri, (İstanbul: Multilingual Yayınları) (Çev: BerkeVardar) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  372. (2014), KutsalKitap (Eski ve Yeni Ahit), (İstanbul: YeniYaşamYayınları) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  373. <https://emojipedia.org/heavy-black-heart/> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  374. <https://gazeteyolculuk.net/google-cinsiyetci-emoji-suclamalari-uzerine-yeni-emojileri-kullanima-sundu> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  375. <https://grigundem.com/markalarin-emoji%CC%87-kullanimlari-9b26fb2b2e0e> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  376. <https://unicode-table.com/tr/1F5A4/> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  377. <http://1stmuse.com/pictograms/> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  378. <https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2016/04/160331_silah_emoji> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  379. <https://www.emojimeanings.net/list-smileys-people-whatsapp> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  380. <https://www.fikrimuhim.com/Binary/Images/Upload/Report/DA_Emoji%20Arastirmasi.pdf> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  381. <https://www.iemoji.com/meanings-gallery/skin-tones> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  382. <http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/kelebek/hayat/iletisim-caginin-vazgecilmez-dili-emoji-26688391> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  383. <http://www.milliyet.com.tr/cadde/cagdas-ertuna/aradigimiz-ortak-dil-bulundu-emoji-2216022> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  384. <https://www.pcmag.com/news/368262/google-debuts-53-gender-fluid-emoji> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  385. <https://www.ethnologue.com/about> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183
  386. <http://creativerepository.com/2010.01.14/evolution-of-olympic-pictograms-1964-to-2012> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783845299839-183

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "Politics, Society and Culture in Turkey | Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur in der Türkei"
Cover des Buchs: Transformation of Higher Education in Turkey
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Bulut Doğan
Transformation of Higher Education in Turkey
Cover des Buchs: The Modernizing Process in Turkey
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Hatice Karakus Öztürk
The Modernizing Process in Turkey
Cover des Buchs: Liberal Thought and Islamic Politics in Turkey
Monographie Kein Zugriff
Özlem Denli
Liberal Thought and Islamic Politics in Turkey
Cover des Buchs: The Transformation of Public Sphere
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Armagan Öztürk, Ayhan Bilgin
The Transformation of Public Sphere

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex