Cover des Buchs: The Contractual Networks of Digital Commons
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Monographie Kein Zugriff

The Contractual Networks of Digital Commons

Self-organized criticality through individual autonomy
Autor:innen:
Verlag:
 2024

Zusammenfassung

Das Werk befasst sich mit Digital Commons. Diese gehören zu den neuen Organisationsformen, die im Bereich der digitalen Wirtschaft entwickelt wurden, und fallen unter den Begriff "Netzwerkunternehmen", die die klassischen hierarchischen Formen von Unternehmen durch eine horizontale Zusammenarbeit zwischen unabhängigen Akteuren ersetzen. Es handelt sich dabei um hybride Organisationsformen, die sowohl Märkte als auch Hierarchien als die beiden wichtigsten Organisationsformen der konventionellen Wirtschaft ablehnen. Sie beruhen auf individueller Autonomie in Verbindung mit egalitären Kooperationsmechanismen und versuchen, das Beste aus der Organisationsstruktur von Unternehmen herauszuholen, ohne die individuelle Autonomie zu opfern.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Copyrightjahr
2024
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0842-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1590-4
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
The Regulation of Digital Technologies
Band
1
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
228
Produkttyp
Monographie

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 14
  2. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff 15 - 26
      1. 2.1.1 Complex systems Kein Zugriff
      2. 2.1.2 Micro-macro states Kein Zugriff
      3. 2.1.3 Emergence Kein Zugriff
        1. 2.1.4.1 Self-organized criticality Kein Zugriff
      1. 2.2.1 Complexity and the law Kein Zugriff
      1. 3.1.1 A systemic view of commons Kein Zugriff
    2. 3.2 Public goods and cooperation Kein Zugriff 63 - 80
    3. 3.3 Distributive justice and cooperation Kein Zugriff 81 - 84
  5. 4. Digital Economy Kein Zugriff 85 - 92
    1. 5.1 Characteristics Kein Zugriff 93 - 99
    2. 5.2 The structure of digital commons Kein Zugriff 100 - 104
      1. 6.1.1 Persons Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.1.2.1 Enspiral Foundation Kein Zugriff
          1. 6.1.2.2.1 Working Groups Kein Zugriff
          2. 6.1.2.2.2 Livelihood Pods Kein Zugriff
        3. 6.1.2.3 Enspiral Ventures Kein Zugriff
      3. 6.1.3 Decision Mechanisms Kein Zugriff
      4. 6.1.4 Cobudget Kein Zugriff
      1. 6.2.1 Participation Kein Zugriff
      2. 6.2.2 Collective entities Kein Zugriff
        1. 6.2.3.1 Value Accounting System (VAS) Kein Zugriff
      4. 6.2.4 Nondominium Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.1.1 Enspiral Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.1.2 Sensorica Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.2.1 Associations and quasi-association organizational contracts Kein Zugriff
        1. 7.2.2.1 Interdependent linked bilateral contracts Kein Zugriff
        2. 7.2.2.2 Multilateral framework contract and bilateral executory contracts Kein Zugriff
        3. 7.2.2.3 Emergent properties of contractual networks: the doctrine of good faith Kein Zugriff
      3. 7.2.3 Steward ownership Kein Zugriff
      1. 7.3.1 Enspiral Kein Zugriff
      2. 7.3.2 Sensorica Kein Zugriff
  9. 8. Conclusions Kein Zugriff 187 - 206
  10. Bibliography Kein Zugriff 207 - 224
  11. Index Kein Zugriff 225 - 228

Literaturverzeichnis (346)

  1. Adar Y/Gelbard M (2013) Contract Remedies – A Relational Perspective, in: Grundmann S/Caffagi F/Vettori G (eds.), The Organizational Contract. London and New York: Routledge: 269–291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  2. Ågren A/Davies N/Foster K (2019) Enforcement is central to the evolution of cooperation, Nature Ecology & Evolution: 1018–1029. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  3. Aleta A/Moreno Y (2018) Multilayer Networks in a Nutshell. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.03488.pdf (accessed: February 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  4. Allen B/Nowak M (2014) Games on graphs, EMS Surveys in Mathematical Sciences: 113–151. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  5. Amstutz M (2009) The Constitution of Contractual Networks, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G (eds.), Networks. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 309–346. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  6. Amstutz M (2013) The Nemesis of European Private Law: Contractual Nexus as a Legislative Conundrum, in: Grundmann S/Cafaggi F/Vettori G (eds.), The Organizational Contract. London and New York: Routledge: 319–356. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  7. Anderson E (1993) Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  8. Archer M (1995) Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  9. Arnet R (2016) Art. 641, in: Breitschmidt P/Jungo A (Hrsg.), Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht, 3. Auf. Zürich, Basel, Genf: Schulthess. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  10. Arvidsson A (2019) Capitalism and Commons. Theory, Culture & Society: 1–28. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0263276419868838 (accessed: August 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  11. Arvidsson et. al (2017) Commons Based Peer Production in the Information Economy. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alessandro_Caliandro/publication/310624903_Commons_Based_Peer_Production_in_the_Information_Economy/links/5834403108ae004f74c85030.pdf (accessed: December 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  12. Axelrod R (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  13. Bachmann G (2022) § 241, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. II, §§ 241 – 310, 9. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  14. Baer S (2015) Rechtssoziologie, 2. Auf. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  15. Bak P (1996) How nature works: the science of self-organized criticality. New York: Copernicus. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  16. Bak P/Chen K (1989)The Physics of Fractals, Physica D 38: 5–12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  17. Bak P/Tang C/Wiesenfeld K (1987) Self-organized Criticality: An explanation of 1/f Noise, Physical Review Letters 59 (4): 381–384. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  18. Banzhaf W (2001) Self-Organizing Systems, in: Meyers R (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology, 3rd Ed. San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  19. Baquero PM (2022) Networks of Collaborative Contracts for Innovation. Oxford, London, New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  20. v. Bar C (2015) Gemeineuropäisches Sachenrecht, Bd. I. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  21. Barabási A-L (2016) Network Science. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  22. Barton N et al (2007) Evolution. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  23. Battiston et al (2017) Determinants of public cooperation in multiplex networks, New J Phys 19 073017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  24. Bauwens M/Niaros V (2017) Value in the Commons Economy: Developments in Open and Contributory Value Accounting. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation. Also available in: http://confrontations.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/1.Value-in-the-Commons-Economy_M.-Bauwens.pdf (accessed: August 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  25. Beatson J/Burrows A/Cartwright J (2020) Anson’s Law of Contract, 31st Ed. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  26. Beekhuis J (1973) Civil Law, in: International Association of Legal Science, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vol. VI, Ch. 2, Lawson F (Ed.), Property and Trust. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck: 3–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  27. Bénabent A (2017) Droit des Obligatios, 16e Ed. Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  28. Benkler et al (2015) Peer Production: A Form of Collective intelligence, in: Malone/Bernstein, Handbook of Collective Intelligence. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 175–204. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  29. Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm, Yale Law Journal (112): 369–446. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  30. Benkler Y (2004) Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production, Yale Law Journal (114): 273–358. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  31. Benkler Y (2006) The Wealth of Networks. New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  32. Benkler Y (2011) The Penguin and the Leviathan. New York: Crown Business. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  33. Benkler Y (2013) Commons and Growth: The Essential Role of Open Commons in Market Economies, U.Chi.L.Rev. (80): 1499–1555. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  34. Benkler Y (2017) Peer Production, the commons, and the future of the firm, Strategic Organization (15): 264–274. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  35. Bently L/Sherman B (2014) Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  36. Bergren Miller A (2014) Enspiral: Changing the Way Social Entrepreneurs Do Business. Available at: https://www.shareable.net/blog/enspiral-changing-the-way-social-entrepreneurs-do-business (accessed: June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  37. Bollier D (2007) The growth of the Commons Paradigm, in: Hess C/Ostrom E, Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 27–40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  38. Bollier D (2014) Think like a Commoner. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  39. Bonan A/Canon C/Pokraka L (2020) Steward-ownership. A short guidebook to legal frameworks. Hamburg: Purpose Stiftung gemeinnützige GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  40. Bove A/Langa M (2021) The Perpetual Business Purpose Trust: The Business Planning Vehicle for the Future, Starting Now, ACTEC Law Journal, Vol. 47: No. 1, Article 3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  41. Bowles S/Gintis H (2011) A cooperative Species. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  42. Bresnahan T (2002) Conclusion: Computer, Productivity, and Wages; Reflections on the Economics of the Information Age, in: Greenan N/L’Horty Y/Mairesse J, Productivity, Inequality and the Digital Economy – A Transatlantic Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 279–297. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  43. Bresnahan T/Trajtenberg M (1995) General Purpose Technologies. “Engines of Growth”?, Journal of Econometrics (65): 83–108. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  44. Bridge M (2015) Personal Property Law, 4rd Ed. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  45. Broumas A (2020) Intellectual Commons and the Law: A Normative Theory for Commons-Based Peer Production. London: University of Westminster Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  46. Brownsword R (2009) Network Contracts Revisited, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G, Networks. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 31–52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  47. Brownsword R (2013) Contracts with Network Effects: Is the Time Now Right?, in: Grundmann S/ Cafaggi F/Vettori G (eds.), The Organizational Contract. London and New York: Routledge: 137–162. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  48. Busche J (2018) Vor § 145, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. I, §§ 1–240, 8. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  49. Buxbaum R (1993) Is “Network” a Legal Concept, JITE (149/4): 698–705. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  50. Bydlinski F (1996) System und Prinzipien des Privatrechts. Wien: Springer, (2013) Österreich Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  51. Byrne D/Callaghan G (2014) Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. London, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  52. Cabraal A/Basterfield S (2018) Better Work Together. Enspiral Foundation Ltd. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  53. Cafaggi F (2008) Contractual Networks and the Small Business Act: Towards European Principles, EUI Woriking Papers, LAW No. 2008/15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  54. Cafaggi F/Grundmann S (2013) Towards a Legal Framework for Transnational European Networks?, in: Grundmann S/Cafaggi F/Vettori G (eds.), The Organizational Contract. London and New York: Routledge: 357–365. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  55. Caldarelli G/Catanzaro M (2012) Networks. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  56. Caldarelli G/Vespignani A (2007) Large Scale Structure and Dynamics of Complex Networks. New Jersey: World Scientific. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  57. Cameron K/Quinn R (2011) Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework, 3rd Ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  58. Campbell DT (1974) Downward causation in hierarchically organized biological systems, in: Ayala FJ/Dobzhansky T (eds.), Studies in the philosophy of biology: Reduction and related problems. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan: 179–186. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  59. Canaris CW (1995) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3. Auf. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  60. Canaris CW (1988) Bankvertragsrecht, 3. Auf. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  61. Canaris CW (1983) Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz, 2 Auf. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  62. Carley K (2000) Organizational Change and the Digital Economy: A Computational Organization Science Perspective. In: Brynjolfsson E/Kahin B (eds.), Understanding the Digital Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 325–351. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  63. Castells M (2000) Towards a Sociology of the Network Society, Contemporary Sociology (29): 693–699. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  64. Castoriadis C (1975) L’ institution imaginaire de la societé. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  65. Cinyabuguma M/Page T/Putterman L (2005) Cooperation under the threat of expulsion in a public goods experiment, Journal of Public Economics (89): 1421–1435. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  66. Coase RH (1937) The Nature of the Firm, Economica (4): 386–405. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  67. Coleman J (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  68. Collins H (2009) The Weakest Link: Legal Implications of the Network Architecture of Supply Chains, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G (eds.), Networks. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 187–210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  69. Collins H (2011) Introduction to Networks as Connected Contracts, in: Teubner G (ed.), Networks as Connected Contracts. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 1–72. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  70. Collins H/Ewing KD/McColgan A (2012) Labour Law. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  71. Comfort L (1994) Self-Organization in Complex Systems, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (4/3): 393–410. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  72. Cronk L/Leech B (2013) Meeting at Grand Central: Understanding the Social and Evolutionary Roots of Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  73. Davies P/Worthington S (2016) Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law, 10th Ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  74. Deakin S/Adams Z (2019) Markesinis and Deakin’s Tort Law, 8th Ed. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  75. Dekkers R (2017) Applied Systems Theory, 2nd Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  76. Demsetz H (2002) Toward a Theory of Property Rights II: The Competition between Private and Collective Ownership, Journal of Legal Studies: 653–672. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  77. Depenheuer O (2010) Artikel 14, in: Mangoldt H/Klein F/Starck C (Hrsg.) GG Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, Bd. 1, 6. Auf. München: Franz Vahlen Verlag: 1313–1503. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  78. Deutsch M (1975) Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?, Journal of Social Issues (31): 137–149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  79. Deutsch M (2011) Cooperation and Competition, in: Coleman P (Ed.), Conflict, Interdependence and Justice, The Intellectual Legacy of Morton Deutsch. New York: Springer: 23–40. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  80. Dross W (2012) Droit des biens. Paris: Montchrestien – Lextenso éditions. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  81. Druey JN (2009) The Difficult Legal Access of Networks, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G (eds.) Networks. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 88–99. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  82. Dukeminier et al (2010) Property, 7th Ed. New York: Aspen Publishers / Wolters Kluwer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  83. Eggertsson T (2003) Open Access versus Common Property, in: Anderson T/McChesney F (eds.), Property Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 73–89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  84. Eisenberg M (2018) Foundational Principles of Contract Law. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  85. Elder-Vass D (2010) The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  86. Elder-Vass D (2016) Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  87. Elster J (1992) Local Justice. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  88. Emerson R (2017) An International Model for Vicarious Liability in Franchising, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (50/2): 245–295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  89. Enspiral (2016) Enspiral Handbook, in: GitBook (repository). Available at: https://www.gitbook.com/book/enspiral/enspiral-handbook/details (accessed: March 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  90. Esser H (1999) Soziologie, Allgemeine Grundlagen, 3. Auf. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  91. Exner A/Kratzwald B (2012) Solidarische Ökonomie & Commons. Wien: Mantelbaum. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  92. Faust F (2016) Digitale Wirtschaft – Analoges Recht: Braucht das BGB ein Update?, in: Ständigen Deputation des Deutschen Juristentages, Verhandlungen des 71. Deutschen Juristentages. München: C.H. Beck: A9-A92. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  93. Fehl K/van der Post D/Semmann D (2011) Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation, Ecology Letters (14): 546–551. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  94. Fici A (2013) An Introduction to Cooperative Law, in: Cragona D/Fici A/Henry H (eds.), International Handbook of Cooperative Law. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 3–64. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  95. Fikentscher W/Heinemann A (2017) Schuldrecht, 11. Auf. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  96. Fletcher G (1996) Basic Concepts of Legal Thought. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  97. Flume W (1983) Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, B. I/2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  98. Flume W (1992) Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, Bd. II, 4. Auf. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  99. Frank R (2010) Microeconomics and Behavior, 8th Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  100. Frankel T (2011) Fiduciary Law. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  101. Fu et al (2008) Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks, Phys Rev E 78: 026117. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  102. Furubotn E/Richter R (2011) Institutions & Economic Theory, 2nd Ed. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  103. Gächter S/Herrmann B (2006) Human cooperation from an economic perspective, in: Kappeler P/Schaik C (eds.), Cooperation in Primates and Humans. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 279–301. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  104. Gadamer H-G (1975) Wahrheit und Methode, 4. Auf. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  105. Gaier R (2019) § 314, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. III, §§ 311–432, 8. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  106. Gardner A/Griffin A/West S (2009) Theory of Cooperation, in: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9780470015902.a0021910. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  107. Garnsey P (2007) Thinking about Property. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  108. Germain M/Magnier V (2017) Les sociétés commerciales, 22e éd. Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ, Lextenso éditions. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  109. Giesler JP (2016) Franchising und Schuldrecht, in: Giesler JP/Nauschütt J (Hrsg.), Franchiserecht, 3. Auf. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag: 298–494. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  110. Giesler JP/Nauschütt J (2016) Einleitung, in: Giesler JP/Nauschütt J (Hrsg.), Franchiserecht, 3. Auf. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag: 1–32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  111. Giotitsas C/Ramos J (2017) A new model of production for a new economy. The New Economics Foundation. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  112. Gold A (2019) The Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty, in: Criddle E (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law. Oxford: OUP: 384 – 403. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  113. Gold A (2016) Accommodating Loyalty, in: Miller P/Gold A (Ed.), Contract, Status and Fiduciary Law. Oxford: OUP: 187–212. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  114. Goldberg (2012) Introduction: Pragmatism and Private Law, 125 Harvard Law Review: 1640–1663. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  115. Gordley J (2012) The functional method, in: Monateri (Ed.), Methods of Comparative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 107–119. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  116. Gordon HS (1954) The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery, Journal of Political Economy 62 (2): 124–142. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  117. Gottwald P (2019) § 328, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. III, §§ 311–432, 8. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  118. Gould SJ (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  119. Graeber D (2001) Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  120. Graziadei M (2006) Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions, in: Reimann M/Zimmermann R (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford, New York: OUP: 441–475. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  121. Greenan et al. (2002) Introduction: The Puzzling Relations between the Computer and the Economy. In: Greenan N/L’Horty Y/Mairesse J (eds.), Productivity, Inequality and the Digital Economy – A transatlantic Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 1–16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  122. Greenstein S (2000) The Evolving Structure of Commercial Internet Markets, in: Brynjolfsson E/Kahin B (eds.), Understanding the Digital Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 151–184. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  123. Grundmann S (2011) Contractual Networks in German private law, in: Cafaggi F (Ed.), Contractual Networks, Inter-Firm Cooperation and Economic Growth. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing: 111–162. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  124. Grundmann S/Cafaggi F/Vettori G (2013) The Contractual Basis of Long-Term Organization – The Overall Architecture, in: Grundmann S/Cafaggi F/Vettori G (eds.), The Organizational Contract. London and New York: Routledge: 3–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  125. Grundmann S/Micklitz H-W/Renner M (2015) Privatrechtstheorie – eine Einführung, in: Grundmann S/Micklitz H-W/Renner M (Hrsg.), Privatrechtstheorie, Bd. I. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck: 1–38. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  126. Guest AG (2017) Implied terms, in: Beale HG (Ed.), Chitty on Contracts, Vol. I, 32nd Ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  127. Hadfield G (1990) Problematic Relations: Franchising and the Law of Incomplete Contracts, Stanford Law Review (42): 927–992. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  128. Hall P (1997) The role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the comparative economy of the industrialized nations, in: Lichbach M/Zuckerman A (Ed.), Comparative Politics, Rationality, Culture and Structure. Cambridge: CUP: 174–207. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  129. Hardin G (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons, Science (162): 1243–1248. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  130. Hardin G (1994) The tragedy of the unmanaged commons, Trends Ecol Evol 9 (5): 199. doi: 10.1016/0169–5347(94)90097–3. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  131. Harke JD (2010) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  132. Hart HLA (1997) The Concept of Law, 2nd Ed. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  133. Hart HLA (1954) Definition in Theory and Jurisprudence, LQR (70): 37–60. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  134. Hauert et al (2002) Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games, Science (296): 1129–1132. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  135. Heap S/Varoufakis Y (2004) Game Theory. 2nd Ed. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  136. Heclo H (1994) Ideas, Interests, and Institutions, in: Dodd L/Jillson C (Ed.), The Dynamics of American Politics, Approaches and Interpretations. London and New York: Routledge: 366–391. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  137. Heenen J (1973) Partnership and Other Personal Associations for Profit, in: International Association of Legal Science, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Conard A (Ed.), Vol. XIII, Ch. 1, Business and Private Organizations. New York: Oceana: 1–97. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  138. Heermann PW (2009) The Status of Multilateral Synallagmas in the Law of Connected Contracts, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G (eds.), Networks: legal issues of multilateral co-operation. Oxford, Portland: Hart Pub: 103–118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  139. Helfrich S (2012) Gemeingüter sind nicht, sie werden gemacht, in: Helfrich S/Heinrich Böll Stiftung (Hrsg.) Commons – Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag: 85–91. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  140. Helfrich S/Bollier D (2012) Commons als transformative Kraft. Zur Einführung, in: Helfrich S/Heinrich Böll Stiftung (Hrsg.) Commons – Für eine neue Politik jenseits von Markt und Staat. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag: 15–23. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  141. Heller M (1999) The Boundaries of Private Property, Yale Law Journal (108): 1163–1223. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  142. Herrmann E (2013) Kernstrukturen des Sachenrechts. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  143. Hess C/Ostrom E (2007) Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons, in: Hess C/Ostrom E (eds.), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 3–26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  144. Hess-Fallon B/Simon A-M (2005) Droit Civil, 8e Ed. Paris: Dalloz. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  145. Hitt L/Brynjolfsson E (2002) Information Technology, Organizational Transformation, and Business Performance, in: Greenan N/L’Horty Y/Mairesse J (eds.) Productivity, Inequality and the Digital Economy – A transatlantic Perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 55–91. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  146. Holland J (1998) Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Oxford, New York: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  147. Holmström B/Roberts J (1998) The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited, The Journal of Economic Perspectives (12): 73–94. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  148. Hondius E (2004) Towards a European Civil Code, in: Hartkamp et al (Ed.), Towards a European Civil Code, 3rd Ed. Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri, Kluwer Law International: 3–20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  149. Honoré AM (1968 [1961]) Ownership, in: Guest AG (Ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. London: OUP: 107–147. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  150. Horsey K/Rackley E (2019) Tort Law, 6th Ed. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  151. Hutter M/Teubner G (1993) The Parasitic Role of Hybrids, JITE (149): 706–715. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  152. Isaeva V (2022) Self-Organization at Different Levels of Metazoan Complexity in Comparative Genomic-Phenomic Context, in: Dambricourt Malassé A (Ed.), Self-Organization as a New Paradigm in Evolutionary Biology. Cham: Springer: 119–160. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  153. Jackson M (2008) Social and Economic Networks. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  154. Jensen HJ (1998) Self-Organized Criticality: Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  155. Johnson D (2003) Social Interdependence: Interrelationships Among Theory, Research and Practice, American Psychologist: 934–945. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  156. Johnson J (2004) Collaboration, Peer review and Open Source Software. Cornell University working paper available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=535022 (accessed: May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  157. Jones C/Hesterly W/Borgatti S (1997) A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms, The Academy of Management Review: 911–945. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  158. Junker A (2020) Grundkurs Arbeitsrecht, 19. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  159. Kalss S/Nowotny C/Schauer M (2008) Österreichisches Gesellschaftsrecht. Wien: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  160. Kasper et al (2017) Genetics and developmental biology of cooperation, Molecular Ecology: 4364–4377. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  161. Kennedy D (2000) From the Will Theory to the Principle of Private Autonomy: Lon Fuller’s “Consideration and Form”, 100 Columbia Law Review: 94–175. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  162. Kitcher P (1993) The Evolution of Human Altruism, The Journal of Philosophy (90): 497–516. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  163. Kleene S (1952) Introduction to Mathematics. Amsterdam/Groningen: North-Holland Publishing Co/ P. Noordhoff N.V. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  164. Kling R/Lamb R (2000) IT and Organizational Change in Digital Economies: A Sociotechnical Approach, in: Brynjolfsson E/Kahin B (eds.) Understanding the Digital Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 295–324. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  165. Kornilakis A (2016) The Social Cooperative Enterprise in Greece. A Vehicle for the Social & Solidarity Economy, European Company Law: 23 – 26. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  166. Kornilakis A (2017) Report from Greece: The New Law on Social Enterprises in Greece, European Company Law: 206 – 210. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  167. Kornilakis A (2020) On the Legal Structure of Digital Commons, European Company Law: 148–155. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  168. Kornilakis A (2023) Biological populations, cooperation mechanisms and distributive justice, JBRT 30:2, https://doi.org/10.26262/jbrt.v30i0.9245 (accessed: August 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  169. Kostakis V/Roos A (2018) New Technologies Won’t Reduce Scarcity, but Here’s Something That Might, Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2018/06/new-technologies-wont-reduce-scarcity-but-heres-something-that-might (accessed: June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  170. Kostakis et al (2018) The convergence of digital commons with local manufacturing from a degrowth perspective: Two illustrative cases, Journal of Cleaner Production (197): 1684–1693. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  171. Kostakis et al (2015) Design Global, manufacture local: Exploring the contours of an emerging productive model, Futures (73): 126–135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  172. Laloux F (2014) Reinventing organizations. Nelson Parker. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  173. Landemore H (2012) Collective Wisdom, in: Landemore H/Elster J (eds.), Collective wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. New York: CUP: 1–10. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  174. Landes D (2003) The Unbound Prometheus. Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present, 2nd Ed. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  175. Lando O/Beale H (2000) Principles of European Contract Law. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  176. Lange K (1998) Das Recht der Netzwerke. Heidelberg: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  177. Larenz K (1975) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 3. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  178. Larenz K/Wolf M (2004) Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, 9. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  179. Lawson FH/Rudden B (2002) The Law of Property, 3rd Ed. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  180. Lerner J/Tirole J (2005) The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond, Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(2): 99–120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  181. Lessig L (2002) The Future of Ideas. New York: Vintage Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  182. Lessig L (2006) Code. Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  183. Levine P (2007) Collective action, Civic Engagement, and the Knowledge Commons, in: Hess C/Ostrom E (eds.), Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 247–275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  184. Li A/Horvath S (2007) Network neighborhood analysis with the multi-node topological overlap measure, Bioinformatics: 222–231. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  185. Lindenfors P (2017) For Whose Benefit? The Biological and Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  186. Löwisch M/Feldmann C (2013) § 311, in: Staudinger Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Berlin: Sellier – de Gruyter. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  187. Luhmann N (1984) Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Schurkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  188. Luhmann N (1993) Das Recht der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Schurkamp Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  189. Macneil I (1974) The Many Futures of Contract, 47 S. Cal. L. Rev.: 691–816. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  190. Malaurie P/Aynés L (2005) Les Biens, 2e Ed. Paris: Editions juridiques associées. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  191. Malaurie P/Aynés L/Stoffel-Munck P (2017) Droit des Obligations, 9e Ed. Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  192. Mandelbrot B (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman: San Francisco. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  193. Martin JA/ de Lope J/Maravall D (2009) Adaptation, anticipation and rationality in natural and artificial systems: computational paradigms mimicking nature, Nat Comput (8): 757–775. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  194. Masclet D (2003) Ostracism in work teams: a public good experiment, International Journal of Manpower (27): 867–887. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  195. Mason A/Stephenson D (2018) American Constitutional Law, 17th Ed. New York, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  196. Matthews B (2017) Precarity, globalism and resistance in emergent collectivism: The case of Enspiral, Global Media Journal, Australian Edition, available at: https://www.academia.edu/33447713/Precarity_globalism_and_resistance_in_emergent_collectivism_The_case_of_Enspiral (accessed: May 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  197. Mayr E (1988) Towards a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  198. Melis A/Semmann D (2010) How is human cooperation different?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B: 2663–2674. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  199. Ménard C (2004) The Economics of Hybrid Organizations, JITE (160): 345–376. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  200. Ménard C (2005) A New Institutional Approach to Organization, in: Ménard C/Shirley M (eds.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Dordrecht: Springer: 281–318. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  201. Merill T/Smith H (2010) The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  202. Michaels R (2006) The Functional Method of Comparative Law, in: Reimann M/Zimmermann R (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford; New York: OUP: 339–382. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  203. Micklitz H-W (2015) Recht als Produkt, in: Grundmann S/Micklitz H-W/Renner M (eds.), Privatrechtstheorie, Bd. II. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck: 1723–1741. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  204. Milinski M (2006) Reputation, personal identity and cooperation in a social dilemma, in: Kappeler P/Schaik C (eds.), Cooperation in Primates and Humans. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 265–278. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  205. Miller D (1995) Complex Equality, in: Miller D/Walzer M (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: OUP: 197–225. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  206. Mitchell M (2009) Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford; New York: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  207. Mitchell S (2009) Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity and Policy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  208. Mobus G/Kalton M (2015) Principles of Systems Science. New York: Springer. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  209. Morris C (Ed.) (1992) Academic Press Dictionary of Science and Technology. San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  210. Möschel W (1986) Dogmatische Strukturen des bargeldlosen Zahlungsverkehrs, AcP (186): 187–236. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  211. Müller-Graff PC (1974) Rechtliche Auswirkungen einer laufenden Geschäftsverbindung im amerikanischen und deutschen Recht. Karlsruhe: VVW GmbH. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  212. Müller-Graff PC (1985) Long-Term Business Relations: Conflicts and the Law, JITE (141): 547–557. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  213. Nicolis G / Prigogine I (1977) Self-Organization in Nonequillibrium Systems. Wiley-Interscience: New York. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  214. Nowak M (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation, Science: 1560–1563. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  215. Nowak M/Highfield R (2011) Super Cooperators. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  216. Nowak M/Tarnita C/Antal T (2010) Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (365): 19–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  217. Odlyzko A/Tilly B (2005) A refutation of Metcalfe's Law and a better estimate for the value of networks and network interconnection. Available at: http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metcalfe.pdf (accessed: June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  218. Olson M (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  219. Orbel J/Dawes R (1993) Social Welfare, Cooperators’ Advantage, and the Option of Not Playing the Game, American Sociological Review (58): 787–800. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  220. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the Commons. New York: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  221. Ostrom E (2010) Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems, The American Economic Review (100): 641–672. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  222. Ostrom E/Hess C (2007) A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons. In: Hess C/Ostrom E (eds.) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 41–81. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  223. P2P Foundation (2017) Commons Transition and P2P: a primer. Transnational Institute. Available at: http://commonstransition.org/commons-transition-p2p-primer (accessed: March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  224. P2P Foundation (2017b) Enspiral. Available at: http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Enspiral (accessed: November 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  225. Parsons T (1951 [2005]) The Social System. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  226. Pasderski E/Dornbusch D (2016) Franchising und Gesellschafts- und Konzernrecht. In: Giesler JP/Nauschütt J (Hrsg.), Franchiserecht, 3. Auf. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag: 564–589. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  227. Payne J/Bettman J (2007) Walking with the Scarecrow: The Information processing Approach to Decision Research, in: Koehler D/Harvey N (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment & Decision Making. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 110–132. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  228. Pazaitis A (2020) Breaking the Chains of Open Innovation: Post-Blockchain and the Case of Sensorica, Information (11): 104, https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020104 (accessed: August 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  229. Pazaitis A/De Filippi P/Kostakis V (2017) Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: The illustrative case of Backfeed, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, available at: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016//j/techfore.2017.05.025 (accessed: October 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  230. Pazaitis A/Kostakis V/Bauwens M (2017) Digital Economy and the rise of open cooperativism: the case of the Enspiral Network, Transfer: 1–16. Also available at: http://www.p2plab.gr/en/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Pazaitis_et_al_2017.pdf (accessed: March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  231. Peel E (2015) The Law of Contract, 14th Ed. London: Thomson Reuters. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  232. Perc M/Szolnoki A (2010) Co-evolutionary games – A mini review, Biosystems (99): 109–125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  233. Poteete A/Janssen M/Ostrom E (2010) Working Together. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  234. Powell W (1990) Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization, Research in Organizational Behavior: 295–316. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  235. Puranam P (2018) The Microstructure of Organizations. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  236. Queller D (1997) Cooperators since life began, Q. Rev. Biol. (72): 184–188. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  237. Rand D/Arbesman S/Christakis N (2011) Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans, PNAS (108), available at: www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1108243108 (accessed: November 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  238. Rand D/Nowak M (2013) Human Cooperation, Trend in Cognitive Sciences (17): 413–424. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  239. Rand D et al (2009) Positive interactions promote public cooperation, Science: 1272–1275. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  240. Ranieri F (2012) Good Faith, in: Basedow J/Hopt K/Zimmerman R/Stier A (eds.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law. Oxford: OUP: 790–794. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  241. Rawls J (1973) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  242. Rawls J (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  243. Reed D (2001) The Law of the Pack, Harvard Business Review: 23–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  244. Renner K (1965 [1928]) Die Rechtsinstitute des Privatrechts. Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  245. Rey H (2007) Die Grundlagen des Sachenrechts und das Eigentum, 3. Auf. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag AG. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  246. Richards P (2017) Law of Contract, 13th Ed. Harlow: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  247. Ritzer G (2014) Prosumption: Evolution, Revolution, or Eternal return of the Same? Journal of Consumer Culture (14): 3–24. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  248. Ritzer G/Jurgenson N (2010) Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital “prosumer”, Journal of Consumer Culture (10): 13–36. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  249. Rogers W (2010) Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, 18th Ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  250. Rohe M (1998) Netzverträge – Rechtsprobleme komplexer Vertragsverbindungen. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  251. Röhl K (1992) Die Gerechtigkeitstheorie des Aristoteles aus der Sicht sozialpsychologischer Gerechtigkeitsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  252. Rose C (1986) The Comedy of the Commons: Commerce, Custom, and Inherently Public Property, U.Chi.L.Rev. (53): 711–781. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  253. Rubenstein et al (2011) Vicarious and other Franchisor Liability. Available at: http://www.franchise.org/sites/default/files/ek-pdfs/html_page/vicariousliability(1)_0.pdf (accessed: July 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  254. Rubin P (1978) The theory of the Firm and the structure of the Franchise Contract, Journal of Law and Economics (21): 223–233. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  255. Runge C (1986) Common Property and Collective Action in Economic Development, World Development (14): 623–635. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  256. Saenger I (2013) Gesellschaftsrecht, 2. Auf. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  257. Sanders A (2021) Vermögensbindung und „Verantwortungseigentum“ im Entwurf einer GmbH mit gebundenem Vermögen, NZG: 1573–1582. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  258. Sanders A (2022) Binding Capital to Free Purpose: Steward Ownership in Germany, ECFR (19): 622–653. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  259. Santos F/Pacheco J/Lenaerts T (2006) Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties, PLOS Computational Biology, e140: 1284–1291. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  260. Sawyer R (1999) The emergence of creativity, Philosophical Psychology 12 (4): 447–469. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  261. Sawyer R (2005) Social Emergence: Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  262. Schacherreiter J (2006) Das Franchise-Paradox. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  263. Schäfer C (2020) Vor § 705 – § 740, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. 7, §§ 705–853, 8. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  264. Schaik C/Kappeler M (2006) Cooperation in primates and humans: closing the gap, in: Kappeler P/Schaik C (eds.), Cooperation in Primates and Humans. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer: 3–21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  265. Schöne T (2023) § 705, in: Hau W/Poseck R (Hrsg.), BeckOK BGB, 65. Auf., https://beck-online.beck.de/Dokument?vpath=bibdata%2Fkomm%2Fbeckokbgb_65%2Fbgb%2Fcont%2Fbeckokbgb.bgb.p705.glii.gl3.glc.htm&pos=1&hlwords=on (accessed: April 2023) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  266. Schmidt K (2002) Gesellschaftsrecht, 4. Auf. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  267. Schmidt K (2014) Handelsrecht, 6. Auf. Köln-Berlin-Bonn-München: Karl Heymanns Verlag KG. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  268. Schmidt K (2018) vor § 343, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch, Bd. V, 4. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  269. Schmidt V (1992) Lokale Gerechtigkeit, Zeitschrift für Soziologie (21): 3–15. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  270. Schlager E/Ostrom E (1992) Property-Rights Regime and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis, Land Economics (68): 249–262. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  271. Schluchter W (2009) Grundlegungen der Soziologie, Bd. II. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  272. Schluep W (2003) Zusammengesetzte Verträge: Vertragsverbindung oder Vertragsverwirrung, in: Honsell H/Portmann W (Hrsg.), Aktuelle Aspekte des Schuld- und Sachenrechts: Festschrift für Heinz Rey zum 60. Geburtstag. Zürich: Schulthess: 285–306. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  273. Schubert C (2018) § 167, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. I, §§ 1–240, 8. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  274. Schubert C (2022) § 242, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. II, §§ 241–310, 9. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  275. Schubert C (2021) § 164, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. I, §§ 1–240, 9. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  276. Schulte E (2014) France, in: Zeidman P (Ed.), Franchise in 30 Jurisdictions Worldwide, available at: http://www.franchise.org/sites/default/files/ek-pdfs/html_page/F2014-France_0.pdf (accessed: July 2021). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  277. Schweik C (2007) Free/Open-Source Software as a Framework for Establishing Commons in Science, in: Hess C/Ostrom E (eds.) Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press: 277–309. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  278. Scott W.R. (2014) Institutions and Organizations, 4th Ed. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington DC: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  279. Semmann D/Krambeck HJ/Millinski M (2003) Volunteering leads to rock-paper-scissors dynamics in a public goods game, Nature (425): 390–393. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  280. Sensorica (2013) Open Value Network: A framework for many-to-many innovation, available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iwQz5SSw2Bsi_T41018E3TkPD-guRCAhAeP9xMdS2fI/edit (accessed: October 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  281. Sensorica (2013b) Reputation System, available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U_SK1GlQUmLnDCpQGanxVnKmsdqoTHoEkwgAVkWJEXs/edit?hl=en_US (accessed March 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  282. Sesorica (2015) Business model 3.0, available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VB_TBnIUstHb7XaYSawx81Bo6WWCkE9n2uv2r5o-xd8/edit# (accessed: October 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  283. Sensorica (2017) The Roadmap v. 4, available at: https:// docs.google.com/document/d/1e3RJJH24cCDp0vnVTi5Qv8LcwUO7M4NSL92ZS17rHG8/edit (accessed October 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  284. Sensorica (2018) About us. In: Sensorica Website. Available at: http://www.sensorica.co/home/about-us (accessed: March 2019). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  285. Sensorica (2020) OVN organizational structure, available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10ytVGkt56a8gaWs64a6Ggj8Sg4WZqo6VDDK0GcH2Kvc/edit?hl=en# (accessed: October 2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  286. Sensorica (2020b) How to organize an event, available at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tV4P7QflF4jPCK6vE538H4Erlr3hIKV13qk_CsoESrY/edit (accessed: November 2022). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  287. Shannon C (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27 (3): 379–423. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  288. Shearer J et al (2016) Why do policies change? Institutions, interests, ideas and networks in three cases of policy reform, Health Policy and Planning (31): 1200–1211. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  289. Siems M (2018) Comparative Law, 2nd Ed. Cambridge, New York: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  290. Simon H.A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics (69): 99–118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  291. Smith A (1776 [1994]) The Wealth of Nations. New York: The Modern Library, BK. V, Ch. I, Pt. III. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  292. Smith R (2014) Property Law, 8th Ed. London, New York: Pearson. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  293. Smith S (2016) The Deed, Not the Motive, in: Miller P/Gold A (eds.), Contract, Status and Fiduciary Law. Oxford: OUP: 213–237. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  294. Soper CH (2020) Commercial expectations and cooperation in symbiotic contracts. London & New York: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  295. Sornette D (2006) Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences. Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools, 2nd Ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  296. Stewart N/Campbell N/Baughen S (2011) The Law of Unincorporated Associations. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  297. Stiglitz J/Walsh C (2006) Principles of microeconomics, 4th Ed. New York: Norton. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  298. Stone R/Devenney J (2015) The Modern Law of Contract, 11th Ed. London and New York: Routledge-Cavendish. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  299. Summers R/McRoberts W/Goodhart A (2000) Rudolf von Jhering’s Influence on American Legal Theory, in: Summers R (Ed.), Essays in Legal Theory. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media: 21–42. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  300. Tapscott D (2015) The Digital Economy, 20th Anniversary Edition. New York: McGraw Hill Education. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  301. Tapscott D/Williams A (2008) Wikinomics. New York: Portfolio, Penguin Group. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  302. Teubner G (1991) Beyond Contract and Organization? The external liability of franchising systems in German law, in: Joerges C (Ed.), Franchising and the Law: Theoretical and Comparative Approaches in Europe and the United States. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  303. Teubner G (2001) Das Recht hybrider Netzwerke, ZHR (165): 550–575. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  304. Teubner G (2009) Coincidentia oppositorum: Hybrid Networks Beyond Contract and Organization, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G (eds.), Networks. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 3–30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  305. Teubner G (2011) Networks as Connected Contracts. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  306. Teubner G (2013) ‘And if I by Beelzebub Cast out Devils, …’: An Essay on the Diabolics of Network Failure, in: Grundmann S/Cafaggi F/Vettori G (eds.), The Organizational Contract. London and New York: Routledge: 113–135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  307. Toffler A (1980) The Third Wave. New York: William Morrow. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  308. Torggler U (2013) Gesellschaftsrecht, AT und Personengesellschaften. Wien: Verlag Österreich. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  309. Tourneau P (1990) Les professionnels ont-ils du coeur?, Dalloz 1990: 21–25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  310. Turgeon N/Thai MTT/Epuran G (2014) OSH Start-ups’ Business Development Challenges: The case of SENSORICA from a Total Integrated Marketing Perspective, International Journal of Economic Practices and Theories: 135–145. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  311. Turing A (1936) On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (42): 230–265. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  312. Turniansky B/Hare A.P. (1998) Individuals and Groups in Organizations. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  313. Varian H (2010) Intermediate Microeconomics, 8th International Student Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  314. Vial J (2012) How is Enspiral structured? Available at: https://www.quora.com/How-is-Enspiral-structured (accessed: June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  315. Vial J (2016) Why I started Enspiral. Available at: http://joshuavial.com/category/enspiral (accessed: June 2023). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  316. Vieweg K/ Werner A (2018) Sachenrecht, 8. Auf. München: Verlag Franz Vahlen. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  317. Vincelles CA (2011) Linked Contracts under French law, in: Cafaggi F (Ed.), Contractual Networks, Inter-Firm Cooperation and Economic Growth. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing: 163–178. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  318. Vogelsang M (2010) Digitalization in Open Economies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  319. Wagner G (2020) Vor § 823, in: Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Bd. VII, §§ 705–853, 8. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  320. Walzer M (1983) Spheres of Justice. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  321. Walzer M (1995) Response, in: Miller D/Walzer M (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: OUP: 281–297. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  322. Wang Z/Szolnoki A/Perc M (2013) Optimal interdependence between networks for the evolution of cooperation, Sci Rep. 2013; 3: 2470, doi: 10.1038/srep02470. PMID: 23959086; PMCID: PMC3747507. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  323. Watkins N et al (2016) 25 Years of Self-Organized Criticality: Concepts and Controversies, Space Sci Rev (198): 3–44. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  324. Weber J/Gover K (2013) Proprietary constitutionalism, in: Tushnet M/Fleiner T/Saunders C (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. New York, London: Routledge. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  325. Weber R (1987) Rahmenverträge als Mittel zur rechtlichen Ordnung langfristiger Geschäftsbeziehungen, ZSR (106): 403–434. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  326. Weise P et al (2005) Neue Mikroökonomie, 5. Auf. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  327. Wellenhofer M (2009) Third Party Effects of Bilateral Contracts, in: Amstutz M/Teubner G (eds.), Networks. Oxford and Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing: 119–136. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  328. West S/ Griffin A/ Gardner A (2007a) Evolutionary Explanations for Cooperation, Current Biology (17): R661-R672. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  329. West S/ Griffin A/ Gardner A (2007b) Social Semantics: altruism, cooperation, strong reciprocity and group selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology (20): 415–432. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  330. Westermann HP (2020) Vorbemerkung vor § 705, in: Erman BGB Kommentar, 16. Auf. Köln: ottoschmidt Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  331. Whittaker S (2017) Introductory, in: Beale HG (Ed.), Chitty on Contracts, Vol. I, 32nd Ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  332. Whittaker S/Zimmermann R (2000) Good faith in European contract law: surveying the legal landscape, in: Whittaker S/Zimmermann R (eds.), Good Faith in European Contract Law. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  333. Wieling HJ (2006) Sachenrecht, Bd. 1, 2. Auf. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  334. Williamson O (1975) Market and Hierarchies. London: The Free Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  335. Williamson O (1979) Transaction-cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations, Journal of Law & Economics (22): 233–261. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  336. Williamson O (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  337. Williamson O (1991) Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives, Administrative Science Quarterly: 269–296. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  338. Williamson O (2005) The Economics of Governance, The American Economic Review (95): 1–18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  339. Wilson E (1980 [1998]) Sociobiology. The Abridged Edition. Cambridge Massachusetts, London England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  340. Wimsatt W (2000) Emergence as Non-Aggregativity and the Biases of Reductionism, Foundations of Science 5: 269–297. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  341. Wolf M/ Neuner J (2016) Allgemeiner Teil des Bürgerlichen Rechts, 11. Auf. München: CH Beck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  342. Wolff M (1938) On the Nature of Legal Persons, LQR 54 (1938): 494-521. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  343. Worthington S (2006) Equity, 2nd Ed. Oxford, New York: OUP. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  344. Yoshida Z (2010) Nonlinear Science. The Challenge of Complex Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  345. Zumbroich J (2016) Die Außenhaftungsrisiken bei Franchissystemen, Produkt- und Produzentenhaftung, in: Giesler JP/Nauschütt J (Hrsg.), Franchiserecht, 3. Auf. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag: 495–522. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904
  346. Zweigert K/Kötz H (1996) Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, 3. Auf. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748915904

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "The Regulation of Digital Technologies"
Cover des Buchs: Archipelago, and the information platform that is the state
Monographie Vollzugriff
Vagelis Papakonstantinou
Archipelago, and the information platform that is the state
Cover des Buchs: Legal Challenges of Disruptive Technologies
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Roman Bieda, Anna Blechová, Efraín Fandiño López, Rosalba Potenzano
Legal Challenges of Disruptive Technologies

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex