Osteuropa Recht behandelt Gegenwartsfragen der Rechtssysteme und Rechtswissenschaft im östlichen Europa sowie deren völkerrechtliche Einbindung. Im Fokus stehen die ost-, ostmittel- und südosteuropäischen Staaten sowie der Kaukasus und Zentralasien. Die Zeitschrift dokumentiert und analysiert Gesetzgebung, Rechtsprechung und rechtswissenschaftliche Debatten in den einzelnen Staaten der Region und leistet einen Beitrag zum internationalen Rechtsvergleich. Die Zeitschrift erscheint vierteljährlich und ist peer-reviewed. Publikationssprachen sind Deutsch und Englisch. Osteuropa Recht wurde 1954 von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Osteuropakunde e.V. gegründet.
Im folgenden Aufsatz wird die nationale Gesetzgebung der Ukraine und ausländische Quellen in Bezug auf eine effektive Informationssicherheit des Staates und der Gesellschaft analysiert, und zwar es handelt sich um einzelne Mechanismen der Umsetzung...
Dieser Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse einer sprachlich-kognitiven Analyse ausgewählter Begriffe der deutschen und polnischen Strafrechtsterminologie vor. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung ist der Nachweis der Äquivalenz der Begriffe in beiden...
Es wurden keine Treffer gefunden. Versuchen Sie einen anderen Begriff.
Rocher L., Hendrickx J.M., de Montjoye Y.-A., Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3069. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Gordienko T., «Pravo na zabuttia» – shcho tse take y chomu pro noho varto znaty? [«The right to forget» – what is it and why you should know about it?] https://ms.detector.media/trends/1411978127/pravo_na_zabuttya_scho_tse_take_y_chomu_ pro_nogo_varto_znat. (in Ukrainian) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Judgment of the European Court of Justice in case Flaminio Costa v. E.N.E.L. of 15 July 1964, court case No. 6/64. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61964CJ0006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Kruegel S. (2019), The informed consent as legal and ethical basis of research data production. FORS Guide No. 05, Version 1.0. Lausanne: Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. https://forscenter.ch/fors-guides/fg-2019-00005/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Maritsch, F., Cil, I., McKinnon, C. et al., Data privacy protection in scientific publications: process implementation at a pharmaceutical company. BMC Med Ethics 23, 65 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00804-w Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Molnár-Gábor F., Beauvais M.J.S., Bernier A., Jimenez M.P.N., Recuero M., Knoppers B.M., Bridging the European Data Sharing Divide in Genomic Science J Med Internet Res 2022;24(10):e37236, doi: 10.2196/37236 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Recommendation CM/Rec (2016)5 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the Internet freedom. URL: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016806415fa. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=ENм. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Greenleaf G., Sri Lanka’s Personal Data Protection Act is Finalised with a Stronger DPR (May 4, 2022). (2022) 177 Privacy Laws & Business International Report 25-27, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4181012 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4181012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Shevchuk, O., Mentukh, N., Current issues of investment support of state information security of Ukraine under conditions of maritime. Reality of Politics. Estimates – Comments – Forecasts. № 22 (4) / 2022. https://doi.org/10.15804/rop2022405. p. 67-80 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Stam A., Kleiner B., (2020). Data anonymization: legal, ethical, and strategic considerations. FORS Guide No. 11, Version 1.0. Lausanne: Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. https://forscenter.ch/fors-guides/fg-2020_00011/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Tikhonova O. V., Holdovskyi A. H., Bratasyuk O. B., Chornohor N. S., Herbut N. A., Serohina, N. K., (2022), The efficiency of tools for social interaction between public authorities and civil society. Amazonia Investiga, 11(51), 161-170. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2022.51.03.15 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
What is personal data? an official website of the Information Commissioner’s Office, https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/key-definitions/what-is-personal-data/ (last accessed: 20.9.2022) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Wiebe, A., Dietrich, N. (eds.), (2017), Open Data Protection: Study on legal barriers to open data sharing – Data Protection and PSI. Göttingen, Germany, Universitätsverlag Göttingen, 263pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17875/gup2017-1061 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Baran B., Południak-Gierz K., Perspektywa regulacji prawa do bycia „zapomnianym“ w Internecie: zarys problematyki, Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 2017, no. 2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Biasiotto R., Pramstaller P. P., Mascalzoni D., (2021), The Dynamic Consent of the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) Study: Broad Aim within Specific Oversight and Communication. BioLaw J. – Rivista Di BioDiritto 21, 277–287. doi:10.15168/2284-4503-786 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Bratasyuk O., Shevchuk O., Protection of children’s information (digital) rights who were illegally exported from the territory of Ukraine during the war or in occupation. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights. у № 2/2022, p. 21-26 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Bryhinets, O. O., Svoboda I., Shevchuk O., Kotukh Y. V., Radich V. Yu., Public value management and new public governance as modern approaches to the development of public administration Revista San Gregorio Т. 1, № 42 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Comandè1 G., Schneider G., Differential Data Protection Regimes in Data-Driven Research: Why the GDPR is More Research-Friendly Than You Think. German Law Journal; Toronto Vol. 23, Iss. 4, (May 2022): 559-596. DOI:10.1017/glj.2022.30 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Anderson D., Abiodun O. P., Christoffels A. (2020), Information Security at South African Universities-Implications for Biomedical Research. Int. Data Privacy L. 10, 180–186. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipaa007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Diaz P. (2022), Data protection: legal considerations for research in Switzerland. FORS Guide No. 17, Version 1.0. Lausanne: Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences FORS. doi:10.24449/FG-2022-00017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Dove, E. S., Chen., J. (2020), Should Consent for Data Processing Be Privileged in Health Research? A Comparative Legal Analysis. Int. Data Privacy L. 10 (2), 117–131. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipz023 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Ducato R., Data protection, scientific research, and the role of information, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume 37, 2020, 105412, ISSN 0267-3649, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105412 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Duguet A-M., Herveg, J. (2021), Safeguards and derogations relating to processing for scientific purposes: Article 89 analysis for biobank research, in: S. Slokenberga, O. Tzortzatou, J. Reichel (eds.), Law, Governance and Technology Series: Individual rights, public interest and research regulation across Europe (pp. 105-120). (Law, Governance and Technology Series; Vol. 43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49388-2_7 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Erdos D. (2021), The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps, Journal of Media Law, 13:1, 1-35, DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Gefenas, E., Lekstutiene, J., Lukaseviciene, V. et al., Controversies between regulations of research ethics and protection of personal data: informed consent at a cross-road. Med Health Care and Philos 25, 23–30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10060-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494
Gefenas, E., Lekstutiene, J., Lukaseviciene, V., Hartlev, M., Mourby, M., Cathaoir, K. Ó. (2021), Controversies between Regulations of Research Ethics and protection of Personal Data: Informed Consent at a Cross-Road. Med. Health Care Philos. doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10060-1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2022-4-494