Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Ausgabe Open Access Vollzugriff

Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Autor:innen:
Zeitschrift:
ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Verlag:
 2020

Über die Zeitschrift

ZEuS verfolgt ein breit angelegtes Konzept: Die Beiträge widmen sich aktuellen und grundsätzlichen Problemen der Europäischen Integration, des Europarechts und des Internationalen Rechts. Mit der Möglichkeit in deutscher, englischer, französischer und spanischer Sprache zu veröffentlichen, bietet ZEuS ein ideales internationales Forum für Beiträge aus Wissenschaft und Praxis. ZEuS ist es ein besonderes Anliegen, neben renommierten Wissenschaftlern auch dem wissenschaftlichen Nachwuchs ein Forum für Veröffentlichungen zu geben. Daher wird die Einreichung von Beiträgen von Nachwuchswissenschaftlern, aber auch von ausgezeichneten Ergebnissen studentischer Magister- und Seminararbeiten unterstützt. Darüber hinaus werden die am Europa-Institut gehaltenen Vorträge grundsätzlich in ZEuS veröffentlicht. Es werden Beiträge in englischer, französischer und deutscher Sprache publiziert. Homepage: www.zeus.nomos.de

Publikation durchsuchen


Bibliographische Angaben

ISSN-Print
1435-439X
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Deutsch
Produkttyp
Ausgabe

Artikel

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 1 - 2
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 3 - 76
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 77 - 102
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 103 - 128
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 129 - 158
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 159 - 194
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 23 (2020), Heft 1
Artikel
Open Access Vollzugriff

Seite 195 - 223
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Literaturverzeichnis (235 Einträge)

  1. ABBOT, KENNETH ET AL., The Concept of Legalization, International Organization 2000, 54/3 ATTERIDGE, AARON; SHRIVASTAVA, MANISH KUMAR; PAHUJA, NEHA, UPADHYAY, HIMANI, Climate Policy in India: What Shapes International, National and State Policy?, AMBIO 2012, Vol. 41, No. 1, available at: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13280-011-0242-5 BAGHDADI, LEILA; MARTÍNEZ-ZARZOSO, INMACULADA, ZITOUNAC, HABIB, Are RTA agreements with environmental provisions reducing emissions?, Journal of International Economics 2013, Vol. 90, Issue 2 BANG; GURI, HOVI, JON, SKODVIN, TORA, The Paris Agreement: Short-Term and Long-Term Effectiveness, Politics and Governance 2016, Vol. 4, Issue 3 BODANSKY, DANIEL, The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement, RECIEL 2016, Vol. 25, Issue 2 BOGOJEVIC, SANJA, Climate Change Law and Policy in the European Union, in: K. R. Gray, R. Tarasofsky and C. Carlarne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Climate Change Law, Oxford 2016 BORN, GARY, International Arbitration: Law and Practice (2nd edn), Köln 2016 BUCHNER, BARABARA, Innovative climate finance: A spotlight on India, Climate Action, 28 November 2016, available at: http://www.climateactionprogramme.org/climate-leader-papers/innovative_climate_finance_a_spotlight_on_india CARRARO, CARLO; EIGENHOFER, CHRISTIAN, Climate and Trade Policy: Bottom-up Approaches towards Global Agreement, Cheltenham 2012 CARRINGTON, DAMIAN, Historic breakthrough’: Norway’s giant oil fund dives into renewables, The Guardian online, 5 April 2019 CARRINGTON, DAMIAN, Just 10% of fossil fuel subsidy cash ‘could pay for green transition’, The Guardian, 1 August 2019, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/aug/01/fossil-fuel-subsidy-cash-pay-green-energy-transition CARRINGTON, DAMIEN; SAFI, MICHAEL, How India’s Battle with Climate Change Could Determine All Our Fates, The Guardian, 6 November 2017, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/nov/06/how-indias-battle-with-climate-change-could-determine-all-of-our-fates CARTER, SHERYL, Ramping Up Energy Efficiency Key to Address Climate Change, Natural Resources Defense Council, 22 September 2016, available at: https://www.nrdc.org/experts/sheryl-carter/ramping-energy-efficiency-key-address-climate-change CLÉMENCON, RAYMOND, The Two Sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal Failure or Historic Breakthrough?, Journal of Environment &amp; Development 2016, Vol. 25, No. 1 CONCA, KEN, The WTO and the Undermining of Global Environmental Governance, Review of International Political Economy 2000, Vol. 7, Issue 3 COSBEY, AARON, Climate Policies, Economic Diversification and Trade, 3 October 2017, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135359 DECHEZLEPRÊTRE, ANTOINE; SATO, MISATO, The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2017, Vol. 11, Issue 2 DESMET, KLAUS; NAGY, DÁVID KRISZTIÁN, ROSSI-HANSBERG, ESTEBAN, The Geography of Development, Journal of Political Economy 2018, Vol. 126, No. 3 EBERHARDT, PIA; OLIVET, CECILIA; STEINFORT, LAVINIA, One Treaty to rule them all. The ever-expanding Energy Charter Treaty and the power it gives corporations to halt the energy transition. Brussels/Amsterdam 2018 ETSY, DANIEL, Toward a Sustainable Global Economy: An Initiative for G20 Leadership, Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 2017, Vol. 5, No. 2 FRÉDÉRIC, SIMON, EU asserts ‘right to regulate’ as part of energy charter treaty reform, Euractiv, 16 July 2019, available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eu-asserts-right-to-regulate-as-part-of-energy-charter-treaty-reform/ FREEHILLS, HERBERT SMITH, Is the recently signed Morocco-Nigeria BIT a step towards a more balanced form of intra-African investor protection?, Herbert Smith Freehills, 23 May 2017, available at: https://hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2017/05/23/is-the-recently-signed-morocco-nigeria-bit-a-step-towards-a-more-balanced-form-of-intra-african-investor-protection/ GERRAD, MICHAEL, The Law of Clean Energy: Efficiency and Renewables, Chicago 2011 GILLINGHAM, KENNETH; RAPSON, DAVID; WAGNER, GERNOT, The Rebound Effect and Energy Efficiency Policy, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2015, Vol. 10, Issue 1 GORDON, KATHRYN; POHL, JOACHIM, Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: A Survey, OECD, 1 June 2011, available at: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/WP-2011_1.pdf GOSH, SUCHARITA; YAMARIK, STEVEN, Do regional trading arrangements harm the environment?, Applied Econometrics and International Development 2006, Vol. 6, No. 2 GRANTZ, DAVID, Potential Conflicts Between Investor Rights and Environmental Regulation Under NAFTA's Chapter 11, Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 2001, Vol. 33 HICKS, GREG, Environmental Protection in International Investment Agreements, Center for Strategic and International Studies, 7 April 2015, available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/environmental-protection-international-investment-agreements HOLZER, KATERYNA; COTTIER, THOMAS, Addressing climate change under preferential trade agreements: Towards alignment of carbon standards under the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, Global Environmental Change 2015, Vol. 35 HOWSE, ROBERT; REGAN, DONALD, The Product/Process Distinction - An Illusory Basis for Disciplining “Unilateralism” in Trade Policy, European Journal of International Law 2000, Vol. 11, No. 2 HULOT, NICOLAS, Soyons cohérents, rejetons le Ceta, Le Journal du Dimanche, 29 June 2019, available at : https://www.lejdd.fr/Politique/nicolas-hulot-soyons-coherents-rejetons-le-ceta-3907233 IRISH, MAUREN, Least-Developed Countries, Climate Change and Trade, Law &amp; Dev. Rev., 2012, Vol. 5, No. 2 JINNAH, SIKINA, Strategic Linkages: The Evolving Role of Trade Agreements in Global Environmental Governance, Journal of Environment &amp; Development 2011, Vol. 20, No. 2 JINNAH, SIKINA; KENNEDY, JULIA, Environmental Provisions in US Trade Agreements: A New Era of Trade-Environment Politics, Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 2011, Vol. 12, No. 1 JINNAH, SIKINA; LINDSAY, ABBY, Diffusion Through Issue Linkage: Environmental Norms in US Trade Agreements, Global Environmental Politics 2016, Vol. 16, Issue 3 JINNAH, SIKINA; MORGERA, ELISA, Environmental Provisions in American and EU Free Trade Agreements: A Preliminary Comparison and Research Agenda, RECIEL 2013, Vol. 22, No. 3 JOHN, TARA, While the Rich World Braces for Future Climate Change, the Poor World is Already Being Devastated By It, CNN, 1 April 2019, available at: https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/31/africa/poorest-hit-the-hardest-climate-change-mozambique-intl/index.html KIM, JOY, Harnessing Regional Trade Agreements for the Post-2012 Climate Change Regime, Climate and Trade Policies in a Post-2012 World, UNEP 2009 KULOVESI, KATI, Real or Imagined Controversies? A Climate Law Perspective on the growing links between the International Trade and Climate Change Regimes, TRADE, L. &amp; DEV., 2014, Vol. 6, No. 1 LEAHY, PAT, Hogan rejects ‘inaccurate’ criticism of EU-Mercosur deal, The Irish Times, 5 July 2019, available at: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/hogan-rejects-inaccurate-criticism-of-eu-mercosur-deal-1.3946980?mode=amp LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Theory and Practice of EC External Trade Law and Policy, London 2018 LEAL, WALTER; LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, University Initiatives in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, Basel 2018 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Commentary on the Energy Charter Treaty, Cheltenham 2018 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL ET AL., Energy Security, Trade and the EU: Regional and International Perspectives, Cheltenham 2016 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL ET AL., International Energy Governance: Selected legal issues, Cheltenham 2014 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Alternative Architecture for Climate Change: Major Economies, Eur. J. Legal Stud. 2011, Vol. 29, No. 4 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Climate Change and International Trade, Cheltenham 2013 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Climate change mitigation from bottom up: Using Preferential Trade Agreements to Promote Climate Change Mitigation, Carbon and Climate Law Rev 2013, Vol. 7, Issue 1 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, EU Trade Law, Cheltenham 2019 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, International Trade and Investment Law: Multilateral, regional and bilateral governance, Cheltenham 2010 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Proliferation of Regional Trade agreements: Complementing or Supplanting Multilateralism?, Chicago Journal of International Law 2011, Vol. 11, No. 2 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Solutions for Sustainability: How the international trade, energy and climate change regimes can help, Basel 2019 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, The European Energy Union: The quest for secure, affordable and sustainable energy, Netherlands 2016 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Trade Proposals for Climate Action, Trade L. &amp; Dev. 2014, Vol. 11, No. 6 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Unilateral Trade-related Climate Change Measures, The Journal of World Investment &amp; Trade <https://brill.com/view/journals/jwit/jwit-overview.xml> 2012, Vol. 13, No. 6 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL, Using Preferential Trade Agreements to Promote Climate Change Mitigation, in: F. Baetens and J. Caiado (eds.), Frontiers of International Law, Leiden 2014 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL; ARMAS, EDUARDO ALVAREZ, The climate-energy-trade nexus in EU external relations, in: S. Minas and V. Ntousas (eds.), EU Climate Diplomacy: Politics, Technology and Networks, Routledge 2018 LEAL-ARCAS, RAFAEL; WOUTERS, JAN, Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and Policy, Cheltenham 2017 LOVINS, AMORY, Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken?, Foreign Affairs, October 1976, available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1976-10-01/energy-strategy-road-not-taken MARIN-DURAN, GRACIA; MORGERA, ELISA, Environmental Integration in the EU's External Relations: Beyond multilateral dimensions, Oxford 2012 MARTÍNEZ-ZARZOSO, INMACULADA; OUESLATI, WALID, Do deep and comprehensive regional trade agreements help in reducing air pollution?, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2018, Vol. 18, Issue 6 MAYEDA, GRAHAM, Sustainable International Investment Agreements: Challenges and Solutions for Developing Countries, in: M. Segger and M. Gehring et al., Sustainable Development in World Investment Law, Global Trade Law Series 2011, Vol. 30 MCANSH, SCOTT; ATTARAN, AMIR, Investor-state dispute settlements: great for business, risky for the environment, Ecojustice Blog, 14 February 2017, available at: https://www.ecojustice.ca/isds-settlements-great-for-business-risky-for-the-environment/ MENDELSOHN, ROBERT ET AL., The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries, Environment and Development Economics 2006, Vol. 11, No. 2 MORIN, JEAN-FRÉDÉRIC, BIALAIS, CORENTIN, Strengthening Multilateral Environmental Governance through Bilateral Trade Deals, CIGI Policy Brief No. 123, 28 February 2018 MORIN, JEAN-FRÉDÉRIC; JINNAH, SIKINA, The untapped potential of preferential trade agreements for climate governance, Environmental Politics 2018, Vol. 27, Issue 3 MORIN, JEAN-FRÉDÉRIC; ROCHETTE, MYRIAM, Transatlantic convergence of preferential trade agreements environmental clauses, Business and Politics 2017, Vol. 19, Issue 4 NAJAM, ADIL, The View from the South: Developing Countries in Global Environmental Politics, in: R. Axelrod and S. VanDeveer (eds.), The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy, Thousand Oaks 2019 NORDHAUS, WILLIAM, A New Solution: The Climate Club, The New York Review of Books, 4 June 2015, available at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/06/04/new-solution-climate-club/ OSBORN, TOM, Why Developing Countries are Disproportionately Affected by Climate Change - and What Can They Do About it, Huffington Post, 22 March 2015, available at: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/tom-osborn/why-developing-countries-_b_6511346.html OURBAK, TIMOTHÉE; MAGNAN, ALEXANDRE, The Paris Agreement and climate change negotiations: Small Islands, big players, Regional Climate Change, 17 November 2017, available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-017-1247-9 PARLETT, KATE; EWAD, SARA, Protection of the environment in investment arbitration - a double edged sword, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 22 August 2017, available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/08/22/protection-environment-investment-arbitration-double-edged-sword/ PLUMER, BRAD; FRIEDMAN, LISA, Island Nations, With No Time to Lose, Take Climate Response Into Their Own Hands, The New York Times, 17 November 2017, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/climate/islands-climate-change-un-bonn.html POLCANO, RODRIGO ET AL., TTIP and Climate Change: How Real Are Race to the Bottom Concerns, CCLR 2017, Vol. 11, Issue 3 RODRIK, DANI, Global trade needs rules that adapt to economic diversity, Financial Times, 6 August 2018 RODRIK, DANI, The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy, New York 2011 SCHILL, STEPHAN, Do Investment Treaties Chill Unilateral State Regulation to Mitigate Climate Change?, J Int'l Arb 2007, Vol. 24, Issue 5 SEGGER, MARIE-CLAIRE CORDONIER; NEWCOMBE, ANDREW, Integrated Agenda for Sustainable Development in International Investment Law, in: M. Segger and M.Gehring, et al., Sustainable Development in World Investment Law, Global Trade Law Series 2011, Vol. 30 SIVARAM, VARUN, Still Shining? Our Third Annual Review on Solar Scale-up in India, Council on Foreign Relations 2018, available at: https://www.cfr.org/blog/still-shining-our-third-annual-review-solar-scale-india STRAZZERI, JOSEPH, A Lucas Analysis of Regulatory Expropriations Under NAFTA Chapter Eleven, Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 2002, Vol. 14 SUH, SANGWON ET AL., Life Cycle Environmental and Natural Resource Implications of Energy Efficiency Technologies, Journal of Industrial Ecology 2016, Vol. 20, Issue 2, available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jiec.12435 TANKERSLEY, JIM, Can We Nudge People Into Conserving Energy? Washington Post, 24 October 2014, available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2014/10/24/can-we-shame-people-into-conserving-energy/ VAN ASSELT, HARRO, Climate change and trade policy interaction: Implications of regionalism, OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, 2017/03 VANDEVELDE, KENNETH, A Brief History of International Investment Agreements’ 12 U.C. Davis J. Int’l L. &amp; Pol’y 2005, Vol. 157, No. 12 WORLAND, JUSTIN, The Leaders of These Sinking Countries Are Fighting to Stop Climate Change. Here's What the Rest of the World Can Learn, TIME, 13 June 2019, available at: https://time.com/longform/sinking-islands-climate-change YEUNG, PETER, Climate Change is Already Battering this West African City, CityLab, 7 April 2019, available at: https://www.citylab.com/environment/2019/04/climate-change-rising-sea-levels-west-africa-coastal-cities/586651/ YODOGAWA, NORIKO, Energy Charter Treaty: Standing Out Beside the WTO, in: M. Matsushita and T.J. Schoenbaum (eds.), Emerging Issues in Sustainable Development, Tokyo 2016, available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-4-431-56426-3_13 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-3
  2. ASSEMBLY OF THE INTER-GOVERNMENTAL MARITIME CONSULTATIVE ORGANIZATION, Amendments to the IMCO Convention, Resolutions A.358 (IX) of 14/11/1975 and A.371 (X) of 9/11/1977, available at: https://bit.ly/36drDfX and https://bit.ly/2FaiGIv (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  3. BAKER, MATTHEW; CARPENTER, ANNE; CHINN, LILY; CLARKE, NADIRA; ELLIOTT, SCOTT; FARLEY, MARK; PERICAK, WILLIAM; SORGENTE, NATALIA; First Annual Report of the Court Appointed Monitor (2017-2018), 21/06/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/36jQE9f (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  4. BEEMELMANS, HUBERT; TREVIRANUS, HANS D., Germany, in: Hollis, Duncan B., Blakeslee, Meritt R., & Ederington, Benjamin L., (eds.), National Treaty Law and Practice, 1st ed., Leiden/Boston, 2005, p. 317-348 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  5. BERMAN, TZEPORAH; LEVINSON, ALEX; HEMMINGS, BILL; KALTENSTEIN, JOHN; ZAITEGUI, MIRIAM; MAGGS, JOHN; RIEGER, DANIEL; SHEARD, WHIT; GRABIEL, DANIELLE; DUMBRILLE, ANDREWS; Letter to IMO Secretary-General Kitack Lim, 14/05/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2QgHrJ8 (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  6. BROWNLIE, IAN, Principles of Public International Law. 7. ed. New York, 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  7. BUNDESAMT FÜR SEESCHIFFFAHRT UND HYDROGRAPHIE, Statistik der Ordnungswidrigkeiten nach der See-Umweltverhaltensverordnung i.V.m. dem MARPOL-Übereinkommen, available at: https://bit.ly/2Q89gmS (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  8. CARNIVAL CORPORATION & PLC; DNV-GL, Compilation and Assessment of Lab Samples from EGCS Washwater Discharge on Carnival ships, 02/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2QCDXzO (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  9. CHRISTINA, BERNADETTE; KHASAWNEH, ROSLAN, Indonesia will not enforce IMO low-sulphur fuel rules on domestic fleet, Reuters, 26/07/2019, available at: https://reut.rs/369yqax (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  10. CORBETT, JAMES J.; WINEBRAKE, JAMES J.; CARR, EDWARD W.; JALKANEN, JUKKA-PEKKA; JOHANSSON, LASSE; PRANK, MARJE; SOFIEV, MIKHAIL; Health Impacts Associated with Delay of MARPOL Global Sulphur Standards, 10/08/2016, available at: https://bit.ly/2MRtM9A (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  11. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SHIPPING, MUMBAI, Engineering Circular No. 02 of 2019: Compliance with the provisions of MARPOL Annex VI, Regulation 14, 28/11/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/354R7ed (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  12. DUBLIN PORT COMPANY, Notice to Mariners No. 37 of 2018: Prohibition on the Discharge of Exhaust Gas Scrubber Wash Water, 11/06/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2ZAVyMq (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  13. EXXONMOBIL, What Does IMO's 0.50% Sulphur Cap Decision Mean for the Bunker Supply Chain?, available at: https://exxonmobil.co/368tbYt (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  14. FABER, JASPER; HUIGEN, DAGMER NELISSEN THOMAS; SHANTI, HARY; VAN HATTUM, BERT; KLEISSEN, FRANK; The impacts of EGCS washwater discharges on port water and sediment, 12/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2QhKocz (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  15. HAMBURG PORT AUTHORITY, Infosheet: Scrubberwasser, 20/08/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/39zagbE (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  16. HANCOCK, ALICE, Carnival reaches $20m settlement over pollution allegations, Financial Times, 03/06/2019, available at: https://on.ft.com/36cUWiT (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  17. HAND, MARCUS, 80% of scrubbers are open-loop: DNV GL, Seatrade Maritime News, 24/05/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/37n3t2N (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  18. INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF SHIPPING; BALTIC AND INTERNATIONAL MARITIME COUNCIL; WORLD SHIPPING COUNCIL; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT TANKER OWNERS; CRUISE LINES INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; INTERNATIONAL PARCEL TANKERS ASSOCIATION; Proposal for a prohibition on the carriage of non-compliant fuel oil for combustion purposes with a sulphur content exceeding 0.50% m/m and suggestions for guidelines to promote effective and consistent implementation of regulation 14.1.3 of MARPOL Annex VI, available at: https://bit.ly/2SG3rih (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  19. INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION, Status of Treaties, 16/12/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/39wq5Qj (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  20. Ibid., Guidance for Port State Control on Contingency Measures for Addressing Non-compliant Fuel Oil, MEPC.1/Circ.881, 21/05/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2QIHGM8 (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  21. Ibid., Guidance on Indication of Ongoing Compliance in the Case of the Failure of a Single Monitoring Instrument, and Recommended Actions to Take if the Exhaust Gas Cleaning System (EGCS) Fails to Meet the Provisions of the 2015 EGCS Guidelines, MEPC.1/Circ.883, 21/05/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/37xDiGS (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  22. Ibid., Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, Resolution MEPC.305(73), 26/10/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2Qf7fpd (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  23. Ibid., Implementation of sulphur 2020 limit – carriage ban adopted, IMO Press briefing n. 19, 26/10/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2QfZEGY (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  24. Ibid., Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, Resolution MEPC.305(73), 26/10/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/37y20qx (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  25. Ibid., Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), 73rd session, 22-26 October 2018 (summary), 26/10/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2Fac4d0 (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  26. Ibid., IMO sets 2020 date for ships to comply with low sulphur fuel oil requirement, IMO Press briefing n. 27, 28/10/2016, available at https://bit.ly/2SWkwF5 (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  27. Ibid., 2015 Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems, Resolution MEPC.259(68), 15/05/2015, available at: https://bit.ly/39rDvwJ (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  28. Ibid., 2009 Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems, Resolution MEPC.184(59), 17/07/2009, available at: https://bit.ly/2szNIGZ (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  29. Ibid., Amendments to the Annex of the Protocol of 1997 to amend the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, Resolution MEPC.176(58), 10/10/2008, available at: https://bit.ly/2tjLrjk (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  30. KHASAWNEH, ROSLAN, Fujairah joins other ports to tighten exhaust rules ahead of 2020 fuel rules, Reuters, 22/01/2019, available at: https://reut.rs/2QcqPCB (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  31. Ibid., Singapore to ban 'wash water' discharge at top ship refueling port from 2020, Reuters, 30/11/2018, available at: https://reut.rs/2QkMYid (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  32. KOSKI, MARJA; STEDMON, COLIN; TRAPP, STEFAN, Ecological effects of scrubber water discharge on coastal plankton: Potential synergistic effects of contaminants reduce survival and feeding of the copepod Acartia tonsa, Marine Environmental Research, Volume 129, 08/2017, pp. 374-385 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  33. KOYAMA, JIROU; ISHIMARU, TAKASHI; TAKASAKI, KOJI; TAKAHASHI, CHIORI; MATSUMOTO, TOSHIYUKI; MICHIO, YUTAKA; YAMAJI, KAZUYO, Report by the expert board for the environmental impact assessment of discharge water from Scrubbers, 07/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2ZOB2bl (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  34. KRIEGER, HEIKE, Article 24. Entry into force, in: Dörr, Oliver; Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds.), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary, Springer, 2012, p. 395 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  35. LE FIGARO.FR, France: première condamnation d'un capitaine de navire pour pollution de l'air, Le Figaro.fr, 26/11/2018, available at: https://bit.ly/2F69fcU (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  36. MARINE DEPARTMENT MALAYSIA, Requirement for ships installed exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS – scrubber) and the discharge of residue and washwater to the sea, Malaysia Shipping Notice, 07/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2Qw4BdB (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  37. MARITIME AND PORT AUTHORITY OF SINGAPORE; SINGAPORE SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, IMO 2020 Sulphur Limit: A Guide for Ships Calling to Port of Singapore – edition 2, 13/06/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2MH2Bhx (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  38. MUNTHE, BERNADETTE CHRISTINA; NANGOY, FRANSISKA; SCHMOLLINGER, CHRISTIAN, Indonesia will implement IMO low-sulfur fuel rule on schedule: ministry, Reuters, 20/08/2019, available at: https://reut.rs/2ZzeYBm (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  39. NORWEGIAN MARITIME AUTHORITY, Regulations of 30 May 2012 No. 488 on environmental safety for ships and mobile offshore units, 30/05/2012, available at: https://bit.ly/2ZEdt4Y (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  40. PACIFIC GREEN TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, Fitting Exhaust Gas Scrubbers In Time For 2020 – Has That Ship Sailed?, Pacific Green Technologies Group, 28/01/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2Q9TYhN (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  41. PANAMA CANAL AUTHORITY, NT Notice to Shipping No. N-1-2019, 01/01/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/369fU25 (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  42. PISMENNAYA, EVGENIA; KHRENNIKOVA, DINA; WITTELS, JACK, Russia May Delay Adopting Rules for Cleaner Ship Fuel, Bloomberg, 27/10/2019, available at: https://bloom.bg/2SBjCxh (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  43. PROELSS, ALEXANDER; SCHATZ, VALENTIN J., Rechtliche Vorgaben zum Umgang mit Schiffsabwasser Völker-, unions- und nationalrechtliche Anforderungen an Einleitungen von Scrubber-Abwasser, Ballastwasser und häuslichem Abwasser durch Schiffe, Dessau-Roßlau, 2018, available at: https://bit.ly/39zd48G (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  44. SCHIANO DI PEPE, LORENZO, International Marine Environmental Law and the EU: An Adequate Framework to Address Environmental Emergencies?, in: Govaere, Inge; Poli, Sara (eds.), EU Management of Global Emergencies: Legal Framework for Combatting Threats and Crises, Brill, Leiden, 2014, p. 297-310 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  45. SERDY, ANDREW, Public international law aspects of shipping regulation, in: Baatz, Yvonne (ed.), Maritime Law, 3rd ed., Oxford, 2014, p. 303-338 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  46. SHI, LEI, Successful use of the tacit acceptance procedure to effectuate progress in International Maritime Law, University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal 11, 1999, n. 2, pp. 299-332 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  47. SHIPS & PORTS, Over 10% Of Containership Capacity Will Have Scrubbers By January 2020, Ships & Ports, 12/12/2019, available at: https://bit.ly/2QuSopE (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  48. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, North American and U.S. Caribbean Sea Emissions Control Areas Penalty Policy for Violations by Ships of the Sulfur in Fuel Standard and Related Provisions, 01/2015, available at: https://bit.ly/2QtY8zO (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  49. XU, MUYU; SINGH, SHIVANI; SCHMOLLINGER, CHRISTIAN, China to expand discharge ban on open-loop exhaust scrubbers –draft, Reuters, 24/07/2019, available at: https://reut.rs/369K455 (30/12/2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-77
  50. BARNER-GAEDICKE, ELISABETH, FRONTEX – Ohne Kontrolle zur europäischen Grenzschutztruppe, Hamburg, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  51. BENDEL, PETRA, Wanderungsbewegungen nach Europa: fester Bestandteil von Politik – überall?, ZAR 2018, S. 187 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  52. BRÖCKER, HERMANN-MATTHIAS, Die externen Dimensionen des EU-Asyl- und Flüchtlingsrechts im Lichte der Menschenrechte und des Völkerrechts, Hamburg, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  53. CALLIESS, CHRISTIAN; RUFFERT, MATTHIAS, EUV/AEUV, 5. Auflage, München, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  54. CARRERA, SERGIO; CORTINOVIS, ROBERTO, Search and rescue, disembarkation and relocation arrangements in the Mediterranean – Sailing Away from Responsibility?, CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe No. 2019-10, June 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  55. DE VRIES, KARIN, An Assessment of Protection in Regions of Origin in Relation to European Asylum Law, EJML 9, 2007, S. 83 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  56. DEN HEIJER, MAARTEN, Reflections on Refoulement and Collective Expulsion in the Hirsi Case, IJRL 25, 2013, S. 265 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  57. FISCHER-LESCANO, ANDREAS; LÖHR, TILLMANN, Rechtsgutachten: Menschen- und flüchtlingsrechtliche Anforderungen an Maßnahmen der Grenzkontrolle auf See, 2007, abrufbar unter: https://www.ecchr.eu/fileadmin/Gutachten/Gutachten_Frontex_Grenzkontrolle_auf_See.pdf (29.11.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  58. FISCHER-LESCANO, ANDRES; TOHIDIPUR, TIMO, Europäisches Grenzkontrollregime. Rechtsrahmen der europäischen Grenzschutzagentur FRONTEX, ZaörV 2007, S. 1219 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  59. GILBERT, GEOFF, Is Europe Living Up to Its Obligations to Refugees?, EJIL 15, 2004, S. 963 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  60. GRABENWARTER, CHRISTOPH; PABEL, KATHARINA, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, 6. Auflage, München, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  61. GRABITZ, EBERHARD; HILF, MEINHARD; NETTESHEIM, MARTIN, Das Recht der Europäischen Union, Band I-III, EUV/AEUV, 68. Ergänzungslieferung, München, Oktober 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  62. GROEBEN, HANS VON DER; SCHWARZE, JÜRGEN; HATJE, ARMIN, Europäisches Unionsrecht: Kommentar, 7. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  63. GUNDEL, JÖRG, Der EuGH als Wächter über die völkerrechtlichen Grenzen von Abkommen der Union mit Besatzungsmächten, EuR 2017, S. 470 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  64. HAILBRONNER, KAY; THYM, DANIEL, European Immigration and Asylum Law: Commentary, 2. Auflage, München, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  65. HEIßL, GREGOR, Rechtliche Überlegungen zum Konzept der Asylverfahrenslager außerhalb Europas, ZÖR 62, 2007, S. 372 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  66. HERDEGEN, MATTHIAS, Völkerrecht, 18. Auflage, München, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  67. KARPENSTEIN, ULRICH; MAYR, FRANZ C., Konvention zum Schutz der Menschenrechte und Grundfreiheiten: Kommentar, 2. Auflage, München, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  68. KRAJEWSKI, MARKUS, Normative Grundlagen der EU-Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen: Verbindlich, umsetzbar und angewandt?, EuR 2016, S. 235 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  69. LEHNERT, MATTHIAS, Frontex und operative Maßnahmen an den europäischen Außengrenzen, Baden-Baden, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  70. LEHNERT, MATTHIAS; MARKARD, NORA, Mittelmeerroulette – Das Hirsi-Urteil des EGMR und die europäische Grenzschutzpolitik auf See, ZAR 2012, S. 194 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  71. LENZ, CARL–OTTO; BORCHARDT, KLAUS, EU-Verträge Kommentar, 6. Auflage, Köln, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  72. LYNSKEY, ORLA, Complementing and completing the Common European Asylum System: a legal analysis of the emerging extraterritorial elements of EU refugee protection policy, E. L. R. 31, 2006, S. 230 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  73. MATZ-LÜCK, NELE, Seenotrettung als völkerrechtliche Pflicht: Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Massenmigrationsbewegungen über das Mittelmeer, VerfBlog, 18.08.2018, abrufbar unter: https://verfassungsblog.de/seenotrettung-als-voelkerrechtliche-pflicht-aktuelle-herausforderungen-der-massenmigrationsbewegungen-ueber-das-mittelmeer/ (29.11.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  74. MCNAMARA, FRANK, Member State Responsibility for Migration Control within Third States – Externalisation Revisited, EJML 15, 2013, S. 319 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  75. MEYER-LADEWIG, JENS; NETTESHEIM, MARTIN; VON RAUMER, STEFAN, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention: Handkommentar, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  76. MORENO-LAX, VIOLETA, Accessing Asylum in Europe: extraterritorial border controls and refugee rigths unter EU Law, Oxford, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  77. NOLL, GREGOR, Visions of the Exceptional: Legal and Theoretical Issues Raised by Transit Processing Centres and Protection Zones, EJML 5, 2003, S. 303 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  78. PECHSTEIN, MATTHIAS; NOWAK, CARSTEN; HÄDE, ULRICH, Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV/GRC/AEUV, Band II, Tübingen, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  79. PROELSS, ALEXANDER, United Nations Convention on the Law on the Sea: A Commentary, München, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  80. SCHWARZE, JÜRGEN; BECKER, ULRICH; HATJE, ARMIN; SCHOO, JOHANN, EU-Kommentar, 4. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  81. SCHMALZ, DANA, Will the ECtHR Shake up the European Asylum System, VerfBlog, 30.11.2018, abrufbar unter: https://verfassungsblog.de/will-the-ecthr-shake-up-the-european-asylum-system/ (29.11.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  82. STERN, KLAUS; SACHS, MICHAEL, Europäische Grundrechte-Charta: Kommentar, München, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  83. STREINZ, RUDOLF, Europarecht, 11. Auflage, Heidelberg, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  84. STREINZ, RUDOLF, EUV/AEUV, 3. Auflage, München, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  85. TER STEEG, MARCUS, Das Einwanderungskonzept der EU, Baden-Baden, 2006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  86. THYM, DANIEL, Britische Einwanderungs- und Asylpolitik: Angelsächsische Impulse für die gemeineuropäische Rechtsentwicklung, ZAR 2006, S. 184 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  87. THYM, DANIEL, Migrationssteuerung im Einklang mit den Menschenrechten, in: FAZ vom 03.08.2018, abrufbar unter: http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/staat-und-recht/fluchtroute-mittelmeer-migrationssteuerung-im-einklang-mit-den-menschenrechten-15134709.html?printPagedArticle=true#pageIndex_0 (29.11.2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  88. THYM, DANIEL, Migrationssteuerung im Einklang mit den Menschenrechten – Anmerkungen zu den migrationspolitischen Diskursen der Gegenwart, ZAR 2018, S. 193 ff. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  89. VEDDER, CHRISTOPH; HEINTSCHEL VON HEINEGG, WOLFF, Europäisches Unionsrecht: Handkommentar, 2. Auflage, Baden-Baden, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  90. ZIMMERMANN, ANDREAS, The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol: A Commentary, Oxford, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-103
  91. ANASTASSOPOULOS, GEORGIOS, Report on a proposal for an electoral procedure incorporating common principles for the election of Members of the European Parliament, 1998 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  92. BARBIERE, CÉCILE, Revers pour Macron sur les listes transnationales, Euractiv, 07/02/2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  93. DELCKER, JANOSCH, The scandal hanging over Ursula von der Leyen, Politico, 25/07/2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  94. DUFF, ANDREW, Report on improving the practical arrangements for the holding of the European elections in 2014, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  95. DUFF, ANDREW, How to govern Europe better: Reflections on reform of the European Parliament, Commission and Council, European Policy Centre Discussion Paper, Brussels 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  96. DUFF, ANDREW, The European Union makes a new push for democracy, European Policy Center Discussion Paper, Brussels 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  97. DONATELLI, LORENZO, A Pan-European District for the European Elections? The Rise and Fall of the Duff Proposal for the Electoral Reform of the European Parliament, Bruges Political Research Papers 44/2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  98. HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, Democracy in Europe: Why the Development of the EU into a Transnational Democracy Is Necessary and How It Is Possible, European Law Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  99. HARDY, CATHERINE, EU parliament rejects transnational lists, Euronews, 07/02/2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  100. HÖKMARK, GUNNAR, Why transnational lists are not a good idea, Euractiv, 06/02/2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  101. HOFFMEISTER, KALOJAN, Creating a European Space of Debate: Europeanizing the European Elections, The New Federalist, 29/04/2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  102. HÜBNER, DANUTA MARIA; PEREIRA, PEDRO SILVA, Report on the composition of the European Parliament, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  103. KOTANIDIS, SILVIA, European Parliament Briefing – European Union electoral law: Current situation and historical background, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  104. MAURER, ANDREAS, Wahlen zum Europäischen Parlament, Europa von A bis Z, Baden-Baden 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  105. MÜLLER, MANUEL, Warum die Sozialdemokraten bei der Europawahl die meisten Stimmen holten, aber nicht die stärkste Fraktion wurden, Der (europäische) Föderalist, 28/10/2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  106. SCHIMA, BERNHARD, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen institutioneller Reformen, Zeitschrift Europarecht (EuR), Beiheft 2, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  107. SCHOLZ, OLAF, Europarede an der Humboldt-Universität Berlin, 28/11/2018. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  108. STIERLE, STEFFEN, Doch keine transnationalen Listen, Euractiv, 08/02/2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  109. VERGER, CHRISTINE, Transnational lists: a political opportunity for Europe with obstacles to overcome, Institute Jacques Delors, Policy Paper No. 216, Paris 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  110. VON ONDARZA, NICOLAI; SCHENUIT, FELIX, Reforming the European Parliament, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP Comment 10, Berlin 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-129
  111. ARNOLD, CHRISTIAN; GÜNTHER, JENS, Arbeitsrecht 4.0 – Praxishandbuch zum Arbeits-, IP und Datenschutzrecht in einer digitalisierten Arbeitswelt, München 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  112. BAECK, ULRICH; WINZER, THOMAS; LAUNER, MIRIAM, Neuere Rechtsprechung im Arbeitsrecht, NZG 2019, S. 858 – 860 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  113. BAYER, BASTIAN, Verpflichtung zur systematischen Arbeitszeiterfassung, GWR 2019, S. 198 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  114. BAYREUTHER, FRANK, Die Verpflichtung des Arbeitgebers zur Erfassung der Arbeitszeit der Beschäftigten, EuZW 2019, S. 446 – 450 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  115. BECKER, STEFANIE, Auswirkungen der EuGH-Rechtsprechung auf die Gesetzgebung, MwStR 2019, S. 478 – 484 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  116. BENKERT, DANIEL, Arbeitsrechtliche Aspekte einer Tätigkeit im Home-Office, NJW-Spezial 2019, S. 306 – 307 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  117. BETTINGHAUSEN, MINA, Pauschale Abgeltung von Überstunden und das Modell der Vertrauensarbeitszeit unter Berücksichtigung der EuGH-Rechtsprechung, BB 2019, S. 2740 – 2743 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  118. BÖS, NADINE, Vertrauen: gut – Stechuhr: besser?, FAZ v. 20.07.2019, S. C1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  119. DÄUBLER, WOLFGANG, Ein guter Betriebsrat verträgt auch Liebesentzug, Interview v. 17.05.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.bund-verlag.de/aktuelles-Ein-guter-Betriebsrat-vertraegt-auch-Liebesentzug (11.03.2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  120. FELSIAK, MICHAELA; SCHMID, ERIK, Rückschritt für die Flexibilisierung oder Fortschritt für den Arbeitsschutz?, BC 2019, S. 271 – 273 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  121. FLÜTER-HOFFMANN, CHRISTIANE; HAMMERMANN, ANDREA; STETTES, OLIVER, Erfolg mit flexiblen Arbeitszeitmodellen – Leitfaden für Personalverantwortliche und Geschäftsleitungen, Köln/Berlin, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  122. FUHLROTT, MICHAEL, Arbeitgeber müssen tägliche Arbeitszeit verlässlich erfassen, NZA-RR 2019, S. 343 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  123. ders.; GARDEN, FLORIAN, Arbeitsrechtliche Folgen des „Stechuhr-Urteils“ des EuGH, ArbRAktuell 2019, S. 263 – 265 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  124. GINAL, JENS; TRIBESS, ALEXANDER, Der EuGH und die Arbeitszeiterfassung – Ein Rollback zu Arbeitsrecht 3.0?, GWR 2019, S. 317 – 320 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  125. GRIMM, DETLEF; FREH, STEFAN, Der EuGH und die Arbeitszeit, ArbRB 2019, S. 278 – 282 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  126. HANAU, HANS, Zum Flexibilisierungspotential der Arbeitszeitrichtlinie, EuZA 2019, S. 423 – 440 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  127. HAPP, DANIEL, Verpflichtung des Arbeitgebers zur Einrichtung eines Arbeitszeiterfassungssystems, jurisPR-Compl 3/2019 v. 28.06.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  128. HENSSLER, MARTIN; LUNK, STEFAN, Leitende Angestellte und das Arbeitszeitrecht – Betrachtungen de lege lata und de lege ferenda, NZA 2016, S. 1425 – 1430 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  129. HERRMANN, LARS; MEYER, MICHAEL, Das Urteil des EuGH zur gesetzlichen Arbeitszeit-Aufzeichnungspflicht, 20.05.2019, abrufbar unter: https://www.arbeitszeitberatung.de/fileadmin/pdf-publikationen/pub144.pdf (11.03.2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  130. HEUSCHMID, JOHANNES, Neujustierung des Arbeitszeitrechts und des Systems der Arbeitszeiterfassung durch den EuGH, NJW 2019, S. 1853 – 1854 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  131. HÖPFNER, CLEMENS; DAUM, JAN ALEXANDER, Die Pflicht des Arbeitgebers zur Erfassung der Arbeitszeit, RdA 2019, S. 270 – 280 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  132. HÖRDT, MICHAEL, Vergütungs- und arbeitsschutzrechtliche Arbeitszeit – ein Rechtsprechungsüberblick, ArbRAktuell 2019, S. 55 – 58 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  133. JARASS, HANS D., Charta der Grundrechte der EU, 3. Aufl. 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  134. KÖSSEL, ANDREAS, Deutsches Arbeitszeitrecht im Wandel?, DB 2019, S. 1958 – 1962 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  135. KOLLMER, NORBERT; KLINDT, THOMAS; SCHUCHT, CARSTEN, Arbeitsschutzgesetz, 3. Aufl. München 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  136. LEIST, DOMINIK, Unionsrecht gebietet Pflicht zur systematischen Arbeitszeiterfassung, jurisPR-ArbR 22/2019 v. 05.06.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  137. LINSENMAIER, WOLFGANG, „Das Richterrecht bleibt unser Schicksal“ – Zur Rechtsfortbildung durch das BAG, RdA 2019, S. 157 – 169 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  138. LÖBIG, CHRISTOPH, Initiativrecht des Betriebsrats zur Einführung elektronischer Arbeitszeiterfassungssysteme gemäß § 87 Abs. 1 Nr. 6 BetrVG? Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  139. MARQUARD, CORNELIA, Pflicht zur Arbeitszeiterfassung, ArbRB 2019, S. 162 – 163 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  140. MERKL, FRANZISKA; SORAVILLA, JUAN BAUTISTA, Spanien als Testobjekt – Im Blickpunkt: Praktischer Einsatz von Arbeitszeiterfassungssystemen nach dem Urteil des EuGH, Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel, Ausgabe 16/2019, S. 5 – 8 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  141. MÖRSDORF, OLIVER, Unmittelbare Anwendung von EG-Richtlinien zwischen Privaten in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH, EuR 2009, S. 219 – 241 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  142. NEZIK, ANN-KATHRIN, Wie es uns gefällt, Der Spiegel 2/2019, S. 10 – 18 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  143. OBERTHÜR, NATHALIE, Arbeitszeiterfassung à la EuGH – ein Weckruf mit Potential?, MDR 2019, S. 1029 – 1032 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  144. PIELE, CHRISTIAN; PIELE, ALEXANDER, Flexible Arbeitszeiten –Arbeitszeitmodelle und Flexibilitätsanforderungen, Eine Analyse des verarbeitenden Gewerbes auf Basis der IG Metall-Beschäftigtenbefragung 2017, Stuttgart 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  145. POTACS, MICHAEL, Effet utile als Auslegungsgrundsatz, EuR 2009, S. 465 – 488 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  146. REINHARD, ANDRÉ, Pflicht zur Arbeitszeiterfassung und Arbeit 4.0 – Wird die Flexibilität abgeschafft oder unbezahlbar?, NZA 2019, S. 1313 – 1319 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  147. RICKEN, OLIVER, Arbeit im Sinne des Arbeitszeitrechts, DB 2016, S. 1255 – 1260 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  148. V. ROETTEKEN, TORSTEN, Pflicht des Arbeitgebers zur Einrichtung eines Systems zur Erfassung der täglichen effektiven Arbeitszeit, jurisPR-ArbR 23/2019 v. 12.06.2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  149. SCHAUB, GÜNTER; AHRENDT, MARTINA; ET AL, Arbeitsrecht-Handbuch, 18. Aufl. München 2019, zitiert nach Bearbeiter Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  150. SCHIPP, JOHANNES, Die Informationsrechte des Betriebsrats – Ein mächtiges Instrument, ArbRB 2009, S. 113 – 117 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  151. Ders., Mitbestimmung bei der Einführung einer technischen Arbeitszeiterfassung – Steht dem Betriebsrat nach dem EuGH-Urteil v. 14.5.2019 ein Initiativrecht zu?, ArbR 2019, S. 282 – 284 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  152. SCHLOTTFELDT, CHRISTIAN; HOFF, ANDREAS, „Vertrauensarbeitszeit” und arbeitszeitrechtliche Aufzeichnungspflicht nach § 16 II ArbZG, NZA 2001, S. 530 – 533 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  153. SCHMID, ERIC, Paukenschlag aus Luxemburg! Unternehmen müssen Arbeitszeit aller Arbeitnehmer erfassen, SPA 2019, S. 81 – 82 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  154. SCHRADER, PETER, Aufzeichnung und Dokumentation der Arbeitszeit nach dem Urteil des EuGH in der Rechtssache CCOO, NZA 2019, S. 1035 – 1039 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  155. SEYR, SYBILLE, Der effet utile in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH, Berlin 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  156. SITTARD, ULRICH; ESSER, ILKA, Das Ende der Vertrauensarbeitszeit? – Das EuGH-Urteil zur Arbeitszeiterfassung, jM 2019, S. 284 – 290 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  157. V. STEINAU-STEINRÜCK, ROBERT; BURMANN, KAI-OLIVER, Überwachung der Arbeitszeit im Homeoffice – Vertrauen vs. Kontrolle, NJW-Spezial 2018, S. 754 – 755 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  158. STÖHR, ALEXANDER; STOLZENBERG, HENDRIC, Dienstreisen: Arbeitszeitrechtliche Behandlung und Vergütung, NZA 2019, S. 505 – 512 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  159. THÜSING, GREGOR; FLINK, MAIKE; JÄNSCH, MELANIE, Arbeitszeiterfassung als europarechtliche Pflicht, ZfA 2019, S. 456 – 485 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  160. ULBER, DANIEL, Die Folgen der Entscheidung des EuGH in der Rechtssache CCOO, NZA 2019, S. 677 – 681 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  161. WANK, ROLF, Facetten der Arbeitszeit, RdA 2014, S. 285 – 290 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  162. WIEBAUER, BERND, Arbeitsschutz und Digitalisierung, NZA 2016, S. 1430 – 1436 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  163. ZUMKELLER, ALEXANDER R., Der EuGH und die Arbeitszeiterfassung – eine sonnenklare Entscheidung?, BB 2019, Umschlagteil I Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-159
  164. ADINOLFI, GIOVANNA; BAETENS, FREYA; CAIADO, JOSÉ; LUPONE, ANGELA; MICARA, ANNA G., International Economic Law: Contemporary Issues, Heidelberg, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  165. ALAM, SHAWKAT; BHUIYAN, JAHID; RAZZAQUE, JONA, International Natural Resources Law, Investment and Sustainability, London, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  166. ALVAREZ, JOSÉ E.; KHAMSI, KATHRYN, The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors, in: Sauvant, Karl P. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2008–2009, Oxford, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  167. ALVAREZ, JOSE; BRINK, TEGAN, Revisiting the Necessity Defence: Continental Casualty v Argentina, in: Sauvant, Karl (ed.), Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy, Oxford, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  168. AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, Restatement of the Law Second, The Foreign Relations Law of the United States, American Law Institute Publishers, 1965 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  169. BERNASCONI-OSTERWALDER, NATHALIE; MCGRAW, DANIEL, et al. Environment and Trade: A Guide to WTO Jurisprudence, Earthscan, 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  170. BHALA, RAJ, Modern GATT law: A Treatise on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, Sweet & Maxwell, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  171. BURKE-WHITE, WILLIAM W.; VON STADEN, ANDREAS, Investment Protection in Extraordinary Times: The Interpretation and Application of Non-Precluded Measures Provisions in Bilateral Investment Treaties, Virginia Journal of International Law, 2008, Vol. 48, pp. 307-348 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  172. CHAISSE, JULIEN, Exploring the Confines of International Investment and Domestic Health Perceptions – Is a General Exceptions Clause a Forced Perspective, American Journal of Law and Medicine, 2013, Vol. 39, pp. 332-360 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  173. CHARNOVITZ, STEVE, The WTO’s Environmental Progress, Journal for International Economic Law, 2007, Vol. 3, pp. 686 – 706 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  174. CHARNOVITZ, STEVE, Trade and Environment, in: Lukauskas, Arvid/Stern, Robert M. et al. (eds.), Handbook of Trade Policy for Development, Oxford University Press, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  175. COLLINS, D. A., The Line of Equilibrium: Improving Investment Arbitration through the Application of the WTO General Exceptions, Arbitration International, 2015, Vol. 32, pp. 575-587 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  176. CONDON, BRADLY J., Environmental Sovereignty And the WTO: Trade Sanctions And International Law, Leiden, 2006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  177. DE MESTRAL, ARMAND; LUKAS VANHONNAEKER, Exception Clauses in Mega-Regionals (International Investment Protection and Trade Agreements), in: Rensmann, Thilo (ed.), Mega-Regional Trade Agreements, Springer, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  178. DESIERTO, DIANE, Public Policy in International Economic Law: The ICESCR in Trade, Finance, and Investment, Oxford University Press, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  179. DIMASCIO, NICHOLAS; PAUWELYN, JOOST, Non-discrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?, American Journal of International Law, 2008, Vol. 102, pp. 48-89 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  180. DOUGLAS, ZACHARY; PAUWELYN, JOOST; VIÑUALES JORGE E., The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice, Oxford University Press, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  181. DUNKLEY, GRAHAM, The Free Trade Adventure: The WTO, the Uruguay Round and Globalism- A Critique, Zed Books, 2000 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  182. ELLIOT, LUKE, Environment and Human Rights in an Investment Law Frame, in: Kate Miles (ed.), Research Handbook on Environment and Investment Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  183. ERIKSEN, CHRISTOFFER C.; EMBERLAND, MARIUS, The New International Law: An Anthology, Martinus Nijhoff, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  184. FITZMAURICE, MALGOSIA; ELIAS, OLUFEMI; MERKOURIS, PANOS, Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On, Leiden, 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  185. FRANCK, SUSAN D., Empirically Evaluating Claims About Investment Treaty Arbitration, North Carolina Law Review, 2007, Vol. 86, pp. 1-89. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  186. FRANCK, SUSAN D., The Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions, Fordham Law Review, 2005, Vol. 73, pp. 1521-1628. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  187. GATTINI, ANDREA; TANZI, ATTILA; FONTANELLI, FILIPPO, General Principles of Law and International Investment Arbitration, Leiden, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  188. GÓMEZ, BELTRÁN; HELENA, LUZ, Armonizar entre libre comercio y protección al medio ambiente, Universidad Externado de Colombia Contexto Revista de Derecho y Economía, 2009, Vol. 29, pp. 75 – 82 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  189. HAI YEN, TRINH, The Interpretation of Investment Treaties, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  190. KANISTHASEN, PARIWAT, Safeguarding Public Policy Space in International Investment Agreements: An ASEAN Perspective, Thammasat Review of Economic and Social Policy, 2015, Vol. 1, pp. 7-39 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  191. KAUFMANN-KOHLER, GABRIELLE, Arbitral Precedent: Dream, Necessity or Excuse? The 2006 Freshfields Lecture, Arbitration International, 2007, Vol. 23, pp. 357-379 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  192. KEENE, AMELIA, The Incorporation and Interpretation of WTO-Style Environmental Exceptions in International Investment Agreements, Journal of World Trade and Investment, 2017, Vol. 18, pp. 62-99 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  193. KOUL, AUTAR KISHAN, Guide to the WTO and GATT: Economics, Law and Politics, Springer, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  194. KURTZ, JÜRGEN, The WTO and International Investment Law: Converging Systems, Cambridge University Press, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  195. LEGUM, BARTON; PETCULESCU. IOANA, GATT Article XX and International Investment Law, in: Echandi, Robert/Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy, Cambridge University Press, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  196. LESTER, SIMON; MERCURIO, BRYAN/DAVIES, ARWEL, World Trade Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Bloomsbury, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  197. LESTER, SIMON; MERCURIO, BRYAN, Safegaurding Policy Space in Investment Agreements, Institut of International Economic Issue Law Brief, 2017, available at: https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/articles/lester-mercurio-iiel-issue-brief-december-2017.pdf (09/01/2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  198. LÉVESQUE, CÉLINE, ‘The Inclusion of GATT Article XX Exceptions in IIAs: A Potentially Risky Policy’, in: Echandi, Robert/Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy, Cambridge, 2014 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  199. LO, CHANG-FA, External Regime Coherence: WTO/BIT and Public Health Tension as an Illustration, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy, 2017, Vol. 7, pp. 263-282 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  200. MANN, HOWARD, Investment Agreements and the Regulatory State: Can Exceptions Clauses Create a Safe Haven for Governments?, 2007, available at: https://ww⁠w.iisd.org/pdf/2007/inv_agreements_reg_state.pdf (11/01/2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  201. MARCEAU, GABRIELLE; TRACHTMAN, JOEL P., Comparing the disciplines of the SPS Agreement, the TBT Agreement, and the GATT 1994, in: Bethlehem, Daniel/McRae, Donald/Neufeld, Rodney/Van Damme, Isabelle, The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, Oxford, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  202. MARJOSOLA, HEIKKI; PELLET, ALAIN, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate, in: Kinnear, Meg N. et al (eds.), Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  203. MARTINI, CAMILLE, Avoiding the Planned Obsolescence of Modern International Investment Agreements: Can General Exception Mechanisms Be Improved, and How?, Boston College Law Review, 2008, Vol. 59, pp. 2877-2897 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  204. MATSUSHITA, MITSUO; SCHOENBAUM, THOMAS; MAVROIDIS, PETROS C. et al., The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice and Policy, 3rd ed., Oxford, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  205. MCLACHLAN, CAMPBELL; SHORE, LAWRENCE; WEINIGER, MATTHEW, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles, Oxford, 2007 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  206. MERCURIO, BRYAN, Safeguarding Public Welfare? – Intellectual Property Rights, Health and the Continuing Evolution of Treaty Drafting in International Investment Agreements, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2015, Vol. 7, pp. 252-276 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  207. MILES, KATE, International Investment Law and Climate Change, 2008, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1154588 (11/01/2020). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  208. MITCHELL, ANDREW D.; HEATON, DAVID; HENCKELS, CAROLINE, Non-Discrimination and the Role of Regulatory Purpose in International Trade and Investment Law, Cheltenham, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  209. MITCHELL, ANDREW D.; MUNRO, JAMES; VOON, TANIA, Importing WTO General Exceptions into International Investment Agreements: Proportionality, Myths, and RISKS, in: Sachs, Lisa E.; Johnson, Lise J.; Coleman, Jesse; Laugier, Romain (eds.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2017, Oxford, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  210. MOLOO, RAHIM; CHAO, JENNY J., International Investment Law and Sustainable Development: Bridging the Unsustainable Gap, in: Bjorklund, Andrea K. (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2012-2013, Oxford, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  211. MOORE, MICHAEL KENNETH, A World Without Walls: Freedom, Development, Free Trade and Global Governance, Cambridge, 2003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  212. MORGERA, ELISA; KULOVESI, KATI, Research Handbook on International Law and Natural Resources, Cheltenham, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  213. MUCHLINSKI, PETER, Trends in International Investment Agreements: Balancing Investor Rights and the Right to Regulate: The Issue of National Security, in: Karl P. Sauvant (ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law and Policy 2008– 2009, Oxford, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  214. NEULING, BRUCE, The Shrimp-Turtle case: Implications for Article XX of GATT and the Trade and Environment Debate, Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 1999, Vol. 22, pp. 1 – 50 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  215. NEWCOMBE, ANDREW, General Exceptions in International Investment Agreements, 2008, available at: https://www.biicl.org/files/3866_andrew_newcombe.pdf (30/04/2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  216. NEWCOMBE, ANDREW, The Use of General Exceptions in IIA: Increasing Legitimacy or Uncertainty?, in: de Mestral, Armand/Lévesque, Célestine (eds.), Improving International Investment Agreements, London, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  217. ORTINO, FEDERICO, The Social Dimension of International Investment Agreements: Drafting a New BIT/MIT Model?, International Law FORUM du droit international, 2005, Vol. 7, pp. 243-250 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  218. RAJU, DEEPAK, General exceptions in the Indian Model BIT: Is the ‘‘necessity’’ test workable?, Jindal Global Law Review, 2016, Vol. 7, pp. 227–243 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  219. REID, EMILY, Balancing Human Rights, Environmental Protection and International Trade, London, 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  220. SACERDOTI, GIORGIO; YANOVICH, ALAN; BOHANES, JAN, The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge, 2006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  221. SHAN, WENHUA; GALLAGHER, NORAH, China, in: Chester Brown (ed.), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties, Oxford, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  222. SPEARS, SUZANNE A., The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements, Journal of International Economic Law, 2010, Vol. 13, pp. 1037 –75 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  223. SWEET, ALEC STONE, Investor-State Arbitration: Proportionality’s New Frontier, Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2010, Vol. 47, pp. 48-76 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  224. SY, DEBORAH, Warning: Investment Agreements are Dangerous to Your Health, George Washington International Law Review, 2011, Vol. 43, pp. 625-653 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  225. TANIGUCHI, YASUHEI; ISHIKAWA, TOMOKO, Balancing Investment Protection and Other Public Policy Goals: Lessons from WTO Jurisprudence, in: Chaisse, Julien (ed.), International Economic Law and Governance: Essays in Honour of Mitsuo Matsushita, Oxford University Press, 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  226. TREBILCOCK, M.J.; HOWSE, ROBERT, The Regulation of International Trade, Psychology Press, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  227. VADI, VALENTINA, Human Rights and Investment at the WTO, in: Radi, Yannick (ed.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Investment, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  228. VAN DEN BOSSCHE, PETER; ZDOUC, WERNER, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Texts, Cases and Materials, 4th ed., Cambridge University Press, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  229. VANDEVELDE, KENNETH J., Rebalancing Through Exceptions, Lewis and Clark Law Review, 2013, Vol. 17, pp. 449-459 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  230. VOIGT, CHRISTINA, Sustainable Development As a Principle of International Law: Resolving Conflicts Between Climate Measures and WTO Law, Leiden, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  231. VOON, TANIA; MITCHELL, ANDREW D.; MUNRO, JAMES, Legal Responses to Corporate Manoeuvring in International Investment Arbitration, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 2014, Vol. 5, pp. 41-68 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  232. WAINCYMER, JEFF, Balancing Property Rights and Human Rights in Expropriation, in: Dupuy, Marie; Francioni, Francesco; Petersmann Ernst-Ulrich (eds.), Human Rights in International Investment Law and Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  233. WALLACH, LORI; SFORZA, MICHELLE, The WTO: Five Years of Reasons to Resist Corporate Globalization, New York, 1999 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  234. YANNACA-SMALL, CATHERINE, Indirect Expropriation" and the "Right to Regulate, in International Investment Law, in: OECD, International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape, 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195
  235. ZLEPTNIG, STEPHAN, Non-Economic Objectives in WTO Law: Justification Provisions of GATT, GATS, SPS and TBT Agreement, Leiden, 2009 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/1435-439X-2020-1-195

Neuesten Ausgaben

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Alle Ausgaben anzeigen
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 4
Ausgabe Vollzugriff
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 4
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 3
Ausgabe Vollzugriff
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 3
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 2
Ausgabe Vollzugriff
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 2
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 1
Ausgabe Vollzugriff
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 28 (2025), Heft 1
Cover der Ausgabe: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Jahrgang 27 (2024), Heft 4
Ausgabe Vollzugriff
Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien
Jahrgang 27 (2024), Heft 4