Communication floods – Emails in scholarly communication

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: SCM Studies in Communication and Media Volume 9 (2020), Issue 3
Open Access Full access

SCM Studies in Communication and Media

Volume 9 (2020), Issue 3

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2020
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
ISSN-Print
2192-4007

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 9 (2020), Issue 3

Communication floods – Emails in scholarly communication

Authors:
ISSN-Print
2192-4007
ISSN-Online
2192-4007
Preview:

The aim of this study is to display the current email usage among academics and the email‘s influence on the field of science by analyzing qualitative interviews and media diaries with 55 German-speaking academics. Emails pose a particular challenge for separating work and personal spheres. Mobile media such as tablets and smartphones reinforce the penetrating effects of emails. Our results show that scholars hardly engage in a temporal and spatial separation of the spheres when accessing work emails. This is one of the reasons why emails contribute to a perception of information overload and stress. While emails cause problems in many fields, we assume that it is particularly pronounced in the scientific field. In order to raise awareness for this topic and to facilitate the handling of emails in the scientific community, we recommend introducing email workshops and regulations at universities.

Bibliography

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  2. Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Ad- vertising, 24(2), 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  3. Basil, M., & Witte, K. (2011). Health risk message design using the Extended Parallel Pro- cess Model. In H. Cho (Ed.), Health communication message design (pp. 41–71). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  4. Blanc, N., & Brigaud, E. (2014). Humor in print health advertisements: enhanced atten- tion, privileged recognition, and persuasiveness of preventive messages. Health Com- munication, 29(7), 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.769832 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  5. Bodemer, N., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Risk perception. In H. Cho, T. Reimer, & K. A. Mc- Comas (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of risk communication (pp. 10–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  6. Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied ap- proach (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  7. Burke, M. C., & Edell, J. A. (1989). The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cogni- tion. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172670 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  8. Breitsohl, H. (2018). Beyond ANOVA. Organizational Research Methods, 12(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118754988 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  9. Campos, B., Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., Gonzaga, G. C., & Goetz, J. L. (2013). What is shared, what is different? Core relational themes and expressive displays of eight posi- tive emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 27(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269993 1.2012.683852 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  10. Carey, R. N., McDermott, D. T., & Sarma, K. M. (2013). The impact of threat appeals on fear arousal and driver behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental research 1990–2011. PloS one, 8(5), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062821 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014). CDC fact sheet: Reported STDs in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from https:///www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/factsheets/std-trends-508.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  12. Choi, Y. H., Cameron, G. T., & Leshner, G. M. (2006). Defining fear appeals-based ant- ismoking PSAs using Izard’s differential emotions scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Dresden, Germany. Re- trieved from http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p90143_index.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  13. Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., Bolls, P. D., & Thorson, E. (2016). Discard the smoking cues Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  14. – keep the disgust: An investigation of tobacco smokers’ motivated processing of anti- tobacco commercials. Health Communication, 32(11), 1319–1330. https://doi.org/10. 1080/10410236.2016.1220042 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  15. Cohen, E. L., Shumate, M. D., & Gold, A. (2007). Anti-smoking media campaign messag- es: Theory and practice. Health Communication, 22(2), 91–102. https://doi. org/10.1080/10410230701453884 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  16. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. https://doi. org/10.1080/03637750500111815 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  17. Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., & Lorch, E. P. (1994). Attention, need for sensation, and health communication campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist, 38(2), 310–322. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1177/0002764294038002011 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  18. Duhachek, A., Agrawal, N., & Han, D. (2012). Guilt versus shame: Coping, fluency, and framing in the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 928–941. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0244 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  19. Earl, A., & Albarracín, D. (2007). Nature, decay, and spiraling of the effects of fear-induc- ing arguments and HIV counseling and testing: A meta-analysis of the short- and long- term outcomes of HIV-prevention interventions. Health Psychology, 26(4), 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.496 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  20. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  21. Evers, C. W., Albury, K., Byron, P., & Crawford, K. (2013). Young people, social media, social network sites and sexual health communication in Australia: “This is funny, you should watch it”. International Journal of Communication, 7, 263–280. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1106 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  22. Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  23. Forgas, J. P. & Koch, A. S. (2013). Mood effects on cognition. In M. D. Robinson, E. R. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 231– 251). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  24. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The Broad- en-and-Build Theory of Positive Emotions. The American psychologist, 56(3), 218– 226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  25. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2 Hartmann, T., Wirth, W., Schramm, H., Klimmt, C., Vorderer, P., Gysbers, A., . . . Sacau, A. (2016). The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES). Journal of Media Psychology, 28, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  26. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000137 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  27. Heffes, A. (2011). First exorcism. On The Rite (Original Motion Picture Score) [CD]. Unit- ed Kingdom: Silva Screen Records Ltd. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  28. Hohenemser, C., Kates, R. W., & Slovic, P. (1985). A causal taxonomy. In R. W. Kates, C. Hohenemser, & J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology (pp. 67–89). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  29. Holmes, M. S. (2013). Cancer comics: Narrating cancer through sequential art. Tulsa Stud- ies in Women’s Literature, 33(1), 147–162. Retrieved from https://www.muse.jhu.edu/ article/550202. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  30. Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  31. Jäger, T., & Eisend, M. (2013). Effects of fear-arousing and humorous appeals in social marketing advertising: The moderating role of prior attitude toward the advertised behavior. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 34(1), 125–134. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2013.754718 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  32. Kim, S.-H., & Willis, A. (2007). Talking about obesity: News framing of who is responsi- ble for causing and fixing the problem. Journal of Health Communication, 12(4), 359– 376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701326051 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  33. Kok, G., Peters, G.-J. Y., Kessels, L. T. E., ten Hoor, G. A., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2018). Ignor- ing theory and misinterpreting evidence: The false belief in fear appeals. Health Psy- chology Review 12(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  34. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46(8), 819–834. https://doi.org/ 10.1037//0003-066x.46.8.819 Lee, J. Y., Slater, M. D., & Tchernev, J. M. (2015). Self-deprecating humor versus other- deprecating humor in health messages. Journal of Health Communication, 20(10), Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  35. 1185–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018591 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  36. Lee, S. T., & Cheng, I.-H. (2010). Assessing the TARES as an ethical model for antismok- ing ads. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 55–75. https://doi. org/10.1080/10810730903460542 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  37. Leiss, W. (2004). Effective risk communication practice. Toxicology Letters, 149(1–3), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2003.12.050 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  38. Lewis, I. M., Watson, B., White, K. M., & Tay, R. (2007). Promoting public health mes- sages: Should we move beyond fear-evoking appeals in road safety? Qualitative Health Research, 17(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306296395 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  39. Lewis, I., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2013). Extending the explanatory utility of the EPPM beyond fear-based persuasion. Health Communication, 28(1), 84–98. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.743430 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  40. Lo-Fo-Wong, D. N. N., Beijaerts, A., de Haes, H. C. J. M., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2014). Cancer in full-color: Use of a graphic novel to identify distress in women with breast cancer. Journal of Health Psychology, 19(12), 1554–1563. https://doi. org/10.1177/1359105313495905 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  41. Martin, R. A. (2010). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.504 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  42. McGraw, A. P., Schiro, J. L., & Fernbach, P. M. (2015). Not a problem: A downside of humorous appeals. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 1(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/ 10.1561/107.00000012 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  43. McNicol, S., & Weaver, S. (2013). “Dude! You mean you’ve never eaten a peanut butter and jelly sandwich?!?” Nut allergy as stigma in comic books. Health Communication, 28(3), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.669671 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  44. Menard, S. (1995). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Monahan, J. L. (1995). Thinking positively: Using positive affect when designing health messages. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Designing health messages: Approach- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  45. es from communication theory and public health practice (pp. 81–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  46. Moyer-Gusé, E., Mahood, C., & Brookes, S. (2011). Entertainment-education in the con- text of humor: Effects on safer sex intentions and risk perceptions. Health Communi- cation, 26(8), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  47. Moyer-Gusé, E., Robinson, M. J., & McKnight, J. (2018). The Role of Humor in Messag- ing about the MMR Vaccine. Journal of Health Communication, 23(6), 514–522. htt- ps://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1473533 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  48. Mukherjee, A., & Dubé, L. (2012). Mixing emotions: The use of humor in fear advertising. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  49. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.389 Myrick, J. G. (2015). The role of emotions in preventative health communication. Lanham, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  50. MD: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  51. Nabi, R. L. (2015). Emotional flow in persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.974129 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  52. Nabi, R. L. (2016). Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication, 31(7), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  53. Nabi, R. L. & Myrick, J. G. (2018). Uplifting fear appeals: Considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health Communication 34(4), 463–474. https://doi.or g/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422847 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  54. North, A. C., Mackenzie, L. C., Law, R. M. & Hargreaves, D. J. (2004). The Effects of mu- sical and voice “fit” on responses to advertisements. Journal of Applied Social Psychol- ogy, 34(8), 1675–1708. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02793.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  55. O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003. tb00292.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  56. Öhman, A. (2008). Fear and anxiety. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 709–729). New York: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  57. Ort, A., & Fahr, A. (2018). Using efficacy cues in persuasive health communication is more effective than employing threats: An experimental study of a vaccination intervention against Ebola. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(3), 665–684. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjhp.12310 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  58. Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re- analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Re- view, 7(sup1), S8–S31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  59. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 124–181. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  60. Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5–20. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  61. Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In R. Plutchik & H. Kellerman (Eds.), Emotion. Theory, research, and experience (pp. 3–31). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  62. Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 925–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  63. Renaud, D., & Unz, D. (2006). Die M-DAS – eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung [The M-DAS – a modified version of the Differential Affect Scale for measuring affective states in media reception]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 18(2), 70–75. https://doi. org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  64. Right Said Fred [Fairbrass, F., Fairbrass, R., Manzoli, R.] (1991). I’m too sexy. On I’m too sexy [CD]. United States: Charisma. https://open.spotify.com/track/2WElktskrNJEwgp p5Vouxk?si=BS65pXHJT5SHzkU60vp7zQ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  65. Rod Kommunikation (2014, August 18). Non, je ne regrette rien [Video file]. Retrieved from https:///www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRfoi6y4RiE Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  66. Ruiter, R. A. C., Kessels, L. T. E., Peters, G.-J. Y., & Kok, G. (2014). Sixty years of fear ap- peal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12042 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  67. Schramm, H., & Spangardt, B. (2016). Wirkung von Musik in der Werbung [The effect of music in advertising]. In G. Siegert, W. Wirth, P. Weber, & J. A. Lischka (Eds.), Hand- buch Werbeforschung (pp. 433–449). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-531-18916-1_19 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  68. Schwarz, U., & Hoffmann, S. (2009). Unter welchen Bedingungen ist humorvolle Werbung erfolgreich [Under what conditions is humorous advertising successful]? Wirtschaftswis- senschaftliches Studium (WiSt), 41(7), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.15358/0340-1650- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  69. 2012-7-344 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  70. Schwarz, U., & Reifegerste, D. (2017). Humorappelle in der Gesundheitskommunikation [Humor appeals in health communication]. In C. Rossmann & M. R. Hastall (Eds.), Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation: Kommunikationswissenschaftliche Perspek- tiven (pp. 1–12). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_37-1 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  71. Shepperd, J. A., Waters, E. A., Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (2015). A primer on unre- alistic optimism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 232–237. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0963721414568341 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  72. Sjöberg, L., Moen, B.-E., & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Trondheim, Norway: Rotunde. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  73. Speck, P. S. (1991). The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of hu- morous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13(1–2), 1–44. https://doi.org Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  74. /10.1080/01633392.1991.10504957 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  75. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Al- barracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729 Västfjäll, D., & Slovic, P. (2013). Cognition and emotion in judgement and decision mak- ing. Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 252–271). New York, NY: Guilford Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  76. Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  77. Vaucaire, M. & Dumont, C. (1961). Non, je ne regrette rien [Recorded by E. Piaf]. On Non, je ne regrette rien / Les Mots d’amour / Jérusalem [Vinyl]. Netherlands: Columbia (10th November 1960). https://open.spotify.com/track/3dkIE8P7hvl3tHl9KSb6dA?si=P eFji_6TQumilQeseEfqfg Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  78. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The Extended Parallel Process Model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi. org/10.1080/03637759209376276 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  79. Witte, K. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–342. https://doi. org/10.1080/108107396127988 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  80. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. https://doi. org/10.1177/109019810002700506 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  81. Yates, F. J., & Stone, E. R. (1992). The risk construct. In F. J. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking be- havior (pp. 1–25). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  82. Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24(1), 3–47. https://doi. org/10.1080/02699930903205698 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  83. Yoon, H. J. (2015). Humor effects in shame-inducing health issue advertising: The moder- ating effects of fear of negative evaluation. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2015.1018463 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  84. World Health Organization (WHO).(2016). Sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Re- trieved from https:///www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted- infections-(stis) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  85. < .001. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-341
  86. Agarwal, R., & Rodhain, F. (2002). Mine or ours: email privacy expectations, employee attitudes, and perceived work environment characteristics. Proceedings of the 35th An- nual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994186 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  87. Bader, A., Fritz, G., & Gloning, T. (2012). Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation 2010- 2011: Eine Online-Befragung [Digital science communication 2010-2011: An online survey]: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek 2012. Retrieved from http://geb.uni-giessen. de/geb/volltexte/2012/8539/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  88. Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887–906. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0573 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  89. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I., & Grinter, R. E. (2005). Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. Human-Com- puter Interaction, 20(1–2), 89–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2005.9667362 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  90. Blasius, J. (2001). Korrespondenzanalyse [Correspondence analysis]. München, Wien, Old- enbourg: Oldenbourg Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  91. Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The Use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307302552 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  92. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft [Social sense: Critique of theoretical reason]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  93. Bourdieu, P. (1995). Sozialer Raum und „Klassen“. Leçon sur la leçon. 2 Vorlesungen [So- cial space and “classes”. Leçon sur la leçon. 2 lectures]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  94. Burgess, A., Jackson, T., & Edwards, J. (2005). Email training significantly reduces email defects. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 71–83. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2004.10.004 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  95. Cameron, A. F., & Webster, J. (2005). Unintended consequences of emerging communica- tion technologies: Instant Messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.12.001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  96. Capra, R., Khanova, J., & Ramdeen, S. (2013). Work and personal e-mail use by univer- sity employees: PIM practices across domain boundaries. Journal of the American So- ciety for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1029–1044. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.22815 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  97. Cardon, P. W., & Marshall, B. (2015). The hype and reality of social media use for work collaboration and team communication. International Journal of Business Communi- cation, 52(3), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525446 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  98. Dressel, M. (2008). E-Mail-Knigge: Das Original [E-mail etiquette: The original]. Freital/ Dresden: WEB-GOLD-Akademie. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  99. Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (2005). College faculty use and perceptions of elec- tronic mail to communicate with students. Communication Quarterly, 53(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500090118 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  100. Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., Smart, R., & Stevenson, M. (2014). Mobile technology and boundary permeability. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 570–588. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-8551.12027 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  101. Eddy, E., D’Abate, C., & Thurston, P. (2010). Explaining engagement in personal activities on company time. Personnel Review, 39(5), 639–654. https://doi. org/10.1108/00483481011064181 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  102. Enders, J. (2008). Professor werden ist sehr schwer, Professor sein dann gar nicht mehr? Ein Beitrag zur Personalstrukturreform an den Hochschulen [Becoming a professor is very difficult, being one is not? A contribution to the personnel structure reform at universities]. In H. Matthies & D. Simon (Eds.), Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung. Wis- senschaft unter Beobachtung: Effekte und Defekte von Evaluationen (pp. 83–98). Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  103. Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of litera- ture from Organization Science, Accounting, Marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The information society, 20(5), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974 Flick, S. (2013). Leben durcharbeiten: Selbstsorge in entgrenzten Arbeitsverhältnissen [Work through life: Self-care in unlimited employment relationships]. Frankfurt/New Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  104. York: Campus Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  105. Gillespie, N. A., Walsh, M., Winefield, A. H., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001). Occupational stress in universities: Staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & Stress, 15(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370117944 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  106. Glavin, P., & Schieman, S. (2012). Work-family role blurring and work-family conflict: The moderating influence of job resources and job demands. Work and Occupations, 39(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406295 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  107. Gloning, T., & Fritz, G. (Eds.). (2011). Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation: Formate und ihre Nutzung [Digital science communication: formats and their usage]. Gießen: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  108. Hjavard, S. (2008). The mediatization of society: A theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  109. Höflich, J. R. (2016). Der Mensch und seine Medien - Mediatisierte interpersonale Kom- munikation. Eine Einführung [Man and his media - Mediatized interpersonal commu- nication. An introduction]. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  110. Höhle, E. A., & Teichler, U. (2013). Determinants of academic job satisfaction in Germa- ny. In P. J. Bentley, H. Coates, I. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, & V. L. Meek (Eds.), Job satisfaction around the academic world (pp. 125–143). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5434-8_7 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  111. Ishii, K. (2005). The human side of the digital divide: Media experience as the border of communication satisfaction with email. Journal of Technical Writing & Communica- tion, 35(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.2190/CHEJ-2CW4-6BNY-9LRT Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  112. Jackson, T., Dawson, R., & Wilson, D. (2001). The cost of email interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 5(1), 81–92. https://doi. org/10.1108/13287260180000760 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  113. Kelly, C., MacKinnon, R. A., McCrudden, M., & Tatham, N. (2015). You’ve got mail! Research report 2015. Retrieved from http://www.futureworkcentre.com/wp-content/ uploads/2015/07/FWC-Youve-got-mail-research-report.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  114. Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1752–1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121958023 Kozicka, P. (2016, May 27). After-work emails: banned in France, ‘a national epidemic’ in Canada. Global News Canada. Retrieved from https://globalnews.ca/news/2725886/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  115. after-work-emails-banned-in-france-a-national-epidemic-in-canada/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  116. Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of ‘mediatization’ as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665070030030103 Krotz, F. (2009). Mediatization. A concept with which to grasp media and societal change. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization. Concept, Changes, Consequences (pp. 21–40). New Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  117. York: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  118. Kuckartz, U. (2012). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstüt- zung: [Qualitative content analysis: Methods, practice, computer assistance]. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz Juventa. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  119. Kuehl, Rebecca, A., Westwick, Joshua, N., & Hunter, Karla, M. (2014). Y R U NOT RE- SPONDING – Teaching effective email communication. Journal of the Communica- tion, Speech, and Theatre Association of North Dakota, 27, 23–30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  120. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Com- puters in Human behavior, 43, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  121. Lam, P. (2016). Academic email requests: A pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic compari- son between faculty and students. In F. Bianchi & S. Gesuato (Eds.), Pragmatic issues in specialized communicative contexts (pp. 127–146). Leiden, Boston, MA: Brill Ro- dopi. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004323902_008 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  122. Lam, P. W. Y. (2014). Professional e-mail communication in higher education in Hong Kong: A case study. Text & Talk, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0041 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  123. Lüthje, C. (2017). Field-specific mediatization: Testing the combination of social theory and mediatization theory using the example of scientific communication. Mediatization Studies, 1, 45–67. Retrieved from http://journals.umcs.pl/ms/article/view/4789/pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  124. Mark, G. J., Voida, S., & Cardello, A. V. (2012). “A pace not dictated by electrons”: An empirical study of work without email. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems, 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  125. Markgraf, D. (2018). Arbeitswelten im Wandel 2018. Auswirkungen etablierter Kommuni- kationsmittel auf die Effizienz modernen Arbeitens [Working environments in transi- tion 2018: Effects of established means of communication on the efficiency of modern working]. Stuttgart, Germany: AKAD University – Hochschule Stuttgart. Retrieved from https://www.akad.de/fileadmin/content/Bilder_und_PDFs/5_Das_AKAD_Fern- studium/AKAD_University/Forschung_und_Wissenschaft_an_der_AKAD_University/ AKAD_Studien_002_-_Arbeitswelten_im_Wandel_-_Auswirkungen_etablierter_Kom- munikationsmittel.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  126. Matzat, U. (2009). The embeddedness of academic online groups in offline social networks. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  127. International Sociology, 24(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580908095911 Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  128. content analysis: Basics and techniques]. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  129. McCloskey, D. W. (2018). An examination of the boundary between work and home for knowledge workers. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Tech- nology Professionals, 9(3), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJHCITP.2018070102 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  130. Misoch, S. (2015). Qualitative Interviews [Qualitative interviews]. Berlin, München, Bos- ton: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110354614 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  131. Nippert-Eng, C. (1996). Calendars and keys: The classification of “home” and “work”. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  132. Sociological Forum, 11(3), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02408393 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  133. Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2005). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of inte- gration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behav- ior, 68(3), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.006 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  134. Pscheida, D., Albrecht, S., Herbst, S., Minet, C., & Köhler, T. Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft: Erste Ergebnisse des Science 2.0-Survey 2013 des Leibniz-Forschungsverbunds „Science 2.0“ [Usage of social media and online-based applications in science: First results of the science 2.0 survey 2013 of the Leibniz research association “Science 2.0”]. Dresden: Technische Universität Dres- den. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-132962 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  135. The Radicati Group (2019). Email statistics report, 2019-2023. Retrieved from https:// www.radicati.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Email-Statistics-Report- 2019-2023-Executive-Summary.pdf=AOvVaw18NHhYzfLWcFTirzuvs_w5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  136. Renaud, K., Ramsay, J., & Hair, M. (2006). “You’ve got e-mail!”…shall I deal with it now? Electronic mail from the recipient’s perspective. International Journal of Human- Computer Interaction, 21(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc2103_3 Roth-Ebner, C. (2015). Der effiziente Mensch: Zur Dynamik von Raum und Zeit in media- tisierten Arbeitswelten [The efficient human being: On the dynamics of space and time Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  137. in mediatized working worlds]. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  138. Schmidt, J. H. (2018). Social Media [Social media]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-658-02096-5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  139. Schmitt, J. B., Debbelt, C. A., & Schneider, F. M. (2018). Too much information? Predic- tors of information overload in the context of online news exposure. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/136911 8X.2017.1305427 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  140. Schneider, H. (2017). Verantwortung, Flexibilität und neue Freiräume im Job werden ge- schätzt – aber nicht von allen: Erste Ergebnisse der großen Arbeitsmarktstudie von IZA und XING [Responsibility, flexibility and new freedom in the job are appreciated - but not by everyone: First results of the large job market study by IZA and XING]. Re- trieved from https://newsroom.iza.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/20170330_Schnei- der_IZA_XING.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  141. Siegert, P. F. (2008). Die Geschichte der E-Mail: Erfolg und Krise eines Massenmediums [The history of the email: Success and crisis of a mass medium]. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  142. Song, H., Jung, J., & Kim, Y. (2017). Perceived news overload and its cognitive and attitu- dinal consequences for news usage in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communica- tion Quarterly, 94(4), 1172–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016679975 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  143. Statista (2019). Durchschnittliche tägliche Nutzungsdauer von Kommunikationsmedien in Deutschland in den Jahren 2016 und 2019 [Average daily usage of communication media in Germany between 2016 and 2019]. Retrieved from https://de.statista.com/ statistik/daten/studie/616143/umfrage/taegliche-nutzungsdauer-von-kommunikations- medien-in-deutschland/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  144. Tang, J. C., Matthews, T., Cerruti, J., Dill, S., Wilcox, E., Schoudt, J., & Badenes, H. (2009). Global differences in attributes of email usage. In S. Fussell, P. Hinds, & T. Ishida (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 international workshop on Intercultural collab- oration (p. 185). New York, NY: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1499224.1499252 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  145. Thiele, F. (2016). Der Einfluss des Feldes auf die Wissenschaftskommunikation: Eine Un- tersuchung des disziplin- und fachspezifischen Einsatzes von E-Publikationsformaten und sozialen Medien [The influence of the field on science communication: A study of the discipline- and subject-specific use of e-publication formats and social media]. In D. Bertel, J. Himmelsbach, & C. Krakovsky (Eds.), Junge Perspektiven auf Partizipation in Geschichte und Gegenwart: Beiträge zur ersten under.docs-Fachtagung zu Kommuni- kation. Wien, Austria: danzig & unfried. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  146. Thomas, G. F., King, C. L., Baroni, B., Cook, L., Keitelman, M., Miller, S., & Wardle, A. (2006). Reconceptualizing e-mail overload. Journal of Business and Technical Com- munication, 20(3), 252–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651906287253 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  147. Van den Hooff, B., & Jackson, T. (2006). Structuring e-mail communication in the work- place: Managing the users’ customization process. Annual Conference of the Interna- tional Communication Association (ICA), Dresden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  148. Vasagar, J. (2013, August 30). Out of hours working banned by German labour ministry. The Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ germany/10276815/Out-of-hours-working-banned-by-German-labour-ministry.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  149. Voß, G. G., & Pongratz, H. J. (1998). Der Arbeitskraftunternehmer. Eine neue Grundform der Ware Arbeitskraft? [The manpower entrepreneur. A new basic form of the commod- ity of manpower?]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 50, 131–158. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  150. Watts, L., & Ducheneaut, N. (2005). In search of coherence: A review of email research. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  151. Human-Computer Interaction. (Vol. 20, No. 1-2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  152. 024.2005.9667360 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  153. Weber, R. M., & Horn, B. D. (2011). Taming your inbox. Journal of Financial Service Pro- fessionals, July 2011, 33–36. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-367
  154. Anderssohn, E., & Frost, F. (2013). The use values of smartphone apps. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  155. Baron, N. S. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse con- trol. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 177–193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  156. Bayer, J. B., Campbell, S. W., & Ling, R. (2016). Connection cues: Activating the norms and habits of social connectedness. Communication Theory, 26(2), 128–149. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/comt.12090 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  157. Blom, J., Chittaranjan, G., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2011). Who’s who with big-five: Analyzing and classifying personality traits with smartphones. Lausanne, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www.idiap.ch/~gatica/publications/ChittaranjanBlomGatica-iswc11.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  158. Brunnhofer, M., Platzer, E., Petrovic, O., & Rauch, W. (2010). Causes and consequences of mobile phone’s indispensability for everyday life: An experimental comparison to inter- net and TV. IEEE Computer Society, 251–257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ ISWC.2011.29 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  159. Burchell, K. (2015). Tasking the everyday: Where mobile and online communication take time. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(1), 36–52. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/2050157914546711 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  160. Chui, R. C. F. (2014). Smartphone usage, social relations and life satisfaction of Hong Kong college students. In W. Ma, A. Yuen, J. Park, W. Lau, & L. Deng (Eds.), New me- dia, knowledge practices and multiliteracies 2015 (pp. 171–178). Singapore: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-209-8_16 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  161. Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Medi- ated Communication, 20, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12109 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  162. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PA- NAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non- clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245–265. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  163. Diener, E. (1994). Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities. Social Indi- cators Research, 31(2), 103–157. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  164. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403– 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  165. Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three dec- ades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037//0033-2909.125.2.276 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  166. Elhai, J. D., Hall, B. J., Levine, J. C., & Dvorak, R.D. (2017). Types of smartphone usage and relations with problematic smartphone behaviors: The role of content consump- tion vs. social smartphone use. Cyperpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(2), article 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-2-3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  167. European Social Survey. (2014). Questionnaire round 7, 2014/2015. Retrieved from http:// www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round7/questionnaire/ESS7_source_main_ques- tionnaire_final_alert_03.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  168. Gao, Y., Li, H., & Zhu, T. (2014). Predicting subjective well-being by smartphone usage behaviors. Proceedings from the International Conference on Health Informatics. HEALTHINF, 317–322. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  169. Google Play. (2016). Flipd: Distraction blocker. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/ store/apps/details?id=com.flipd.app&hl=de Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  170. Hefner, D., & Vorderer, P. (2017). Digital stress: Permanent connectedness and multitask- ing. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 237–249). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  171. Hoffner, C. A., & Lee, S. (2015). Mobile phone use, emotion regulation, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(7), 411–416. https://doi. org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0487 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  172. Hoffner C. A., Lee, S., & Park, S. J. (2016). “I miss my mobile phone!”: Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2452–2468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444815592665 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  173. Initiative 21. (2010). Die Digitale Gesellschaft in Deutschland – Sechs Nutzertypen im Vergleich [The digital society in Germany – six user types in comparison]. Retrieved from http://www.initiatived21.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Digitale-Gesellschaft_ Endfassung.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  174. International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal wellbeing index (5th ed.). Melbourne, Aus- tralia: The Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Retrieved from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/pwi-a-english.pdf Kaun, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2014). “No media, less life?”: Online disconnection in Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  175. mediatized worlds. First Monday, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i11.5497 Kassambara, A. (2018). Machine learning essentials: Practical guide in R. CreateSpace In- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  176. dependent Publishing Platform. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  177. Kohout, S. & Schumann, C. (2020, February 24). Measuring the associations between smartphone use and subjective well-being during normal use and a deprivation condi- tion: A hybrid feedback and elicitation diary combined with a qualitative interview guideline. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685545 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  178. Kuckartz, U. (2010). Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten [In- troduction to computer assisted analysis of qualitative data] (3rd edition). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS, Verl. für Sozialwiss. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  179. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. (2015). Checking email less frequently reduces stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 220–228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  180. LaRose, R. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory (10503293), 20(2), 194–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01360.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  181. LaRose, R., Connolly, R., Lee, H., Li, K., & Hales, K. D. (2014). Connection overload? A cross cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Information Sys- tems Management, 31(1), 59–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2014.854097 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  182. Larsen, J. T., Hershfield, H. E., Stastny, B. J., & Hester, N. (2017). On the relationship be- tween positive and negative affect: Their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion, 17, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  183. Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846. supp Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  184. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684–696. https:// doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.684 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  185. Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and satisfaction with life in college students. Com- puters in Human Behavior, 31, 343–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.049 Licoppe, C. (2004). “Connected” presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for manag- ing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  186. Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d323t Ling, R. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into so- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  187. ciety. Cambridge: MIT Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  188. Ling, R., & Lai, C. H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12251 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  189. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Meth- odology, 1, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  190. Mai, L. M., Freudenthaler, R., Schneider, F. M., & Vorderer, P. (2015): “I know you’ve seen it!” Individual and social factors for users’ chatting behavior on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 296–302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.074 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  191. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(8), 522– 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  192. Mastrolia, B. A. (1997). The media deprivation experience: Revealing mass media as both message and massage. Communication Education, 46(3), 203. https://doi. org/10.1080/03634529709379092 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  193. Misra, S., & Stokols, D. (2012). Psychological and health outcomes of perceived informa- tion overload. Environment and Behavior, 44, 737–759. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0013916511404408 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  194. Nowland, R., Necka, E. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2017). Loneliness and social internet use: Pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617713052 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  195. Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  196. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_5 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  197. Reinecke, L., & Oliver, M. B. (2017). Media use and well-being: Status quo and open ques- tions. In L. Reinecke & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 3–13). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  198. Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M. (2017). Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 17– 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.09.001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  199. Ruhnau, J. (2016, February 25). Daran erkennen Sie, ob Sie handysüchtig sind [That is how you know that you are addicted to your cell phone]. Welt N24. Retrieved from https://www.welt.de/wirtschaft/webwelt/article152633755/Daran-erkennen-Sie-ob-Sie- handysuechtig-sind.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  200. Sherman, L. E., Michikyan, M., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends. CyberPsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(2), Article 3. http://dx.doi. org/10.5817/CP2013-2-3 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  201. Schnauber, A. (2017). Medienselektion im Alltag [Media selection in daily life]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15441-7 Schnauber-Stockmann, A., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2018). Procrastination out of habit? The role of impulsive versus reflective media selection in procrastinatory media use. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  202. Media Psychology, 21(4), 640–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1476156 Schimmack, U. (2003). Affect measurement in experience sampling research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 79–106. Retrieved from http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3psyuli/ Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  203. JH03AffectESM.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  204. Schimmack, U. (2007). Methodological issues in the assessment of the affective component of subjective well-being. In A. D. Ong & M. H. M. Van Dulmen, (Eds.), Oxford hand- book of methods in positive psychology (pp. 96–110). Oxford, England: Oxford Uni- versity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  205. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective wellbeing. The Science of Subjective Well-Being, 97–123. Retrieved from http://www.erin.utoronto.ca/~w3psyuli/SWB- Structure.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  206. Stegmüller, D. (2013). How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of fre- quentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 748–761. Trepte, S., & Scharkow, M. (2017). Friends and live-savers: How social capital and social support received in media environments contribute to well-being. In L. Reinecke & M. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  207. B. Oliver (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of media use and well-being: International perspectives on theory and research on positive media effects (pp. 304–316). New York, NY: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  208. Vanden Abeele, M., de Wolf, R., & Ling, R. (2018). Mobile media and social space: How anytime, anyplace connectivity structures everyday life. Media and Communication, 6, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i2.1399 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  209. Verbrugge, K., Stevens, I., De Marez, L. (2013). Multifaceted companion devices: Applying the new model of media attendance to smartphone usage. Paper presented at the 63rd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/df3e/53d5cc3b229d4d1e4686489824315093a004.pdf Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. (2016). Permanently online – permanently con- nected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694–703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  210. chb.2016.05.085 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  211. Windahl, S., Höjerback, I., & Hedinsson, E. (1986). Adolescents without television: A study in media deprivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158609386607 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-394
  212. Aronson, E (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. Abelson, E. Aronson, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  213. W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cogni- tive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago, Il: Rand McNally. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  214. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psycho- logical Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  215. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I. & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-es- teem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier life- styles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 1–44. https://doi. org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  216. BAG (2019). Facts & figures: Tobacco. Retrieved from https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/ home/zahlen-und-statistiken/zahlen-fakten-zu-sucht/zahlen-fakten-zu-tabak.html Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  217. Blanc, N., & Brigaud, E. (2014). Humor in print health advertisements: Enhanced atten- tion, privileged recognition, and persuasiveness of preventive messages. Health Com- munication, 29, 669–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.769832 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  218. Brehm, J. W., & Brehm, S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  219. Brockner, J., & Elkind, M. (1985). Self-esteem and reactance: Further evidence of attitudi- nal and motivational consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90035-6 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  220. CDC (2017). Health effects of cigarette smoking. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/to- bacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/effects_cig_smoking/index.htm Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  221. Cho, Y. J., Thrasher, J. F., Swayampakala, K., Yong, H. H., McKeever, R., Hammond, D., ... & Borland, R. (2016). Does reactance against cigarette warning labels matter? Warn- ing label responses and downstream smoking cessation amongst adult smokers in Aus- tralia, Canada, Mexico and the United States. PloS one, 11, 1–16. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159245 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  222. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its elicit role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03637750500111815 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  223. Erceg-Hurn, D., & Steed, L. (2011). Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psy- chological reactance in smokers? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00710.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  224. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  225. Gibbons, F. X., Eggleston, T. J., & Benthin, A. C. (1997). Cognitive reactions to smoking relapse: The reciprocal relation between dissonance and self-esteem. Journal of Person- ality and Social Psychology, 72, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.184 Glock, S., & Kneer, J. (2009). Are deterrent pictures effective? The impact of warning la- bels on cognitive dissonance in smokers. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  226. 1, 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01019.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  227. Glock, S., Müller, B., & Ritter, S.M. (2012). Warning labels formulated as questions posi- tively influence smoking-related risk perception. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105312439734. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  228. Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 7–16. https://doi. org/10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.7 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  229. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analy- sis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  230. Hellman, C. M., & McMillin, W. L. (1997). The relationship between psychological reac- tance and self-esteem. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 135–138. https://doi. org/10.1080/00224549709595424 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  231. Huang, L. L., Thrasher, J. F., Abad, E. N., Cummings, K. M., Bansal-Travers, M., Brown, A., & Nagelhout, G. E. (2015). The US national Tips From Former Smokers antismok- ing campaign: promoting awareness of smoking-related risks, cessation resources, and cessation behaviors. Health Education & Behavior, 42, 480–486. https://doi. org/10.1177/1090198114564503 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  232. Joubert, C. E. (1990). Relationship among self-esteem, psychological reactance, and other personality variables. Psychological Reports, 66, 1147–1151. https://doi.org/10.2466/ pr0.1990.66.3c.1147 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  233. LaVoie, N. R., Quick, B. L., Riles, J. M., & Lambert, N. J. (2017). Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communication Research, 44, 416–436. https://doi. org/10.1177/0093650215609669 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  234. Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R. Leary & J. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and iden- tity (pp. 401–418). New York, NY: Guilford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  235. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  236. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119–186). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60091-X Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  237. Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A re- view and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psy- chology Compass, 5, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  238. McCaul, K. D., Hockemeyer, J. R., Johnson, R. J., Zetocha, K., Quinlan, K., & Glasgow, R. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  239. E. (2006). Motivation to quit using cigarettes: a review. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 42– 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.04.004 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  240. Morita, A. (2007). Tobacco smoke causes premature skin aging. Journal of Dermatological Science, 48, 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.06.015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  241. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.4.379 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  242. Nabi, R. L. (2016). Laughing in the face of fear (of disease detection): Using humor to promote cancer self-examination behavior. Health Communication, 31, 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2014.1000479 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  243. Norman, P., Conner, M., & Bell, R. (1999). The theory of planned behavior and smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 18, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.18.1.89 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  244. Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7, 8–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  245. Peterson, A. A., Haynes, G. A., & Olson, J. M. (2008). Self-esteem differences in the effects of hypocrisy induction on behavioral intentions in the health domain. Journal of Per- sonality, 76, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00487.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  246. Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111418108 Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In J. P. Dil- lard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  247. and Practice (pp. 167–183). London, UK: SAGE Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  248. Rahman, M. S., Mannan, M., & Rahman, M. M. (2018). The intention to quit smoking: The impact of susceptibility, self-efficacy, social norms and emotional intelligence embedded model. Health Education, 118, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-06-2017-0033 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  249. Renaud, D., & Unz, D. (2006). Die M-DAS-eine modifizierte Version der Differentiellen Affekt Skala zur Erfassung von Emotionen bei der Mediennutzung. [The MDAS – a modified version of the Differential Emotion Scale for the assessment of emotions in media use.] Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 18, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.18.2.70 Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  250. Journal of Psychology, 91, 93–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  251. versity Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  252. Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Education Monographs, 2, 354–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200405 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  253. Ruiter, R. A., Kessels, L. T., Peters, G. J. Y., & Kok, G. (2014). Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12042 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  254. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1–36). Chichester, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  255. Silvia, P. J. (2006). Reactance and the dynamics of disagreement: Multiple paths from threatened freedom to resistance to persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.309 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  256. Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013). Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety? A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 213–240. http://dx. doi.org/10.1037/a0028931 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  257. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Al- barracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  258. Tobacco Products Directive (2014). Tobacco Products Directive (2014/40/EU). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/law/pictorial_en (13.02.2018) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  259. Thrasher, J. F., Swayampakala, K., Borland, R., Nagelhout, G., Yong, H. H., Hammond, D., Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  260. ... & Hardin, J. (2016). Influences of self-efficacy, response efficacy, and reactance on responses to cigarette health warnings: a longitudinal study of adult smokers in Aus- tralia and Canada. Health Communication, 31, 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0410236.2015.1089456 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  261. Tyc, V. L., Lensing, S., Rai, S. N., Klosky, J. L., Stewart, D. B., & Gattuso, J. (2006). Pre- dicting perceived vulnerability to tobacco-related health risks and future intentions to use tobacco among pediatric cancer survivors. Patient Education and Counseling, 62, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.001 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  262. Van Dellen, M. R., Campbell, W. K., Hoyle, R. H. & Bradfield, E. K. (2011). Compensat- ing, resisting, and breaking: A meta-analytic examination of reactions to self-esteem threat. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 51–74. https://doi. org/10.1177/1088868310372950 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  263. van ‘t Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting informa- tion: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7, 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2011.606782 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  264. Velicer, W. F., DiClemente, C. C., Rossi, J. S., & Prochaska, J. O. (1990). Relapse situations and self-efficacy: An integrative model. Addictive Behaviors, 15, 271–283. https://doi. org/10.1016/0306-4603(90) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  265. Wakefield, M., Freeman, J., & Donovan, R. (2003). Recall and response of smokers and recent quitters to the Australian National Tobacco Campaign. Tobacco control, 12, ii15–ii22. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.suppl_2.ii15 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  266. Weinstein, N. D., Marcus, S. E., & Moser, R. P. (2005). Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk. Tobacco Control, 14, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2004.008375 World Health Organization (2016). Smoking & tobacco use. Retrieved from https://www. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  267. cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm (23.01.2018). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  268. White, V., Bariola, E., Faulkner, A., Coomber, K., & Wakefield, M. (2014). Graphic health warnings on cigarette packs: how long before the effects on adolescents wear out?. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17, 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu184 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  269. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59, 329–349. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03637759209376276 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  270. Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals. Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615. https://doi. org/10.1177/109019810002700506 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  271. Wong, N. C., & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Antismoking threat and efficacy appeals: effects on smoking cessation intentions for smokers with low and high readiness to quit. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802593928 Xu, J. (2015). Designing messages with high sensation value: when activation meets reac- tance. Psychology & Health, 30, 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.97 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  272. 7280 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-421
  273. Ahmed, S., & Matthes, J. (2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette, 79, 219–244. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  274. Arlt, H. J., Storz, W., Wallraff, G., & Simon, U. (2011). Drucksache „Bild“ – Eine Marke und ihre Mägde. Die „Bild“-Darstellung der Griechenland- und Eurokrise 2010 [Print- ed matter „Bild“ – A brand and its maids. The “Bild” presentation of the Greek and Euro crisis 2010]. Abgerufen von: https://www.otto-brenner-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_data/stiftung/02_Wissenschaftsportal/02_Infoseiten/Bild_Studien/01_Drucksache_Bild/ AH_Bild_TeilIV_punkt7.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  275. Aslan, E., Akkılıç, E. E., & Hämmerle, M. (2017). Islamistische Radikalisierung: biografis- che Verläufe im Kontext der religiösen Sozialisation und des radikalen Milieu [sic] [Is- lamist radicalization: Biographical developments in the context of religious socializa- tion and the radical milieu]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  276. Beck, U. (2015). Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne [Risk society. On the way to a different modernity]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  277. Bierhoff, H.-W., & Frey, D. (2011). Sozialpsychologie – Individuum und soziale Welt [So- cial psychology – individual and social world]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  278. Bild (26. März 2018). Islamismus-Alarm an Berliner Grundschulen. Morddrohungen ge- gen ‚ungläubige‘ Kinder [Islamism alarm at Berlin elementary schools. Death threats against ‘unbelieving’ children]. Bild, S.1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  279. Blum, R. (2011). Leidende Leuchttürme. Über die Unentbehrlichkeit von Qualitätsmedien [Suffering lighthouses. About the indispensability of quality media]. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommu- nikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 7–15). Wiesbaden, Ger- many: Springer-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  280. Bruck, P. A., & Stocker, G. (1996). Die ganz normale Vielfältigkeit des Lesens: zur Rezep- tion von Boulevardzeitungen [The normal diversity of reading: On the reception of tabloid newspapers] (Vol. 23). Münster, Germany: LIT. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  281. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2019). Zahlen zur salafistischen Szene in Deutschland [Figures on the Salafist scene in Germany]. Redaktion Infodienst Radikalisierungspräven- tion am 08.01.2019. Abgerufen von https://www.bpb.de/politik/extremismus/radika- lisierungspraevention/265409/ zahlen-zur-salafistischen-szene-in-deutschland Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  282. D’Angelo, P., Lule, J., Neuman, W. R., Rodriguez, L., Dimitrova, D. V., & Carragee, K. M. (2019). Beyond framing: A forum for framing researchers. Journalism & Mass Com- munication Quarterly, 96 (1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018825004 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  283. Dantschke, C. (2017). Attraktivität, Anziehungskraft und Akteure des politischen und mil- itanten Salafismus in Deutschland [Attractiveness, attraction and actors of political and militant Salafism in Germany]. In A. Toprak & G. Weitzel (Hrsg.), Salafismus in Deutschland. Jugendkulturelle Aspekte, pädagigische Perspektiven (S. 61–76). Wies- baden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  284. Donsbach, W., & Büttner, K. (2005). Boulevardisierungstrend in deutschen Fernsehnach- richten [Boulevardization trend in German television news]. Publizistik, 50, 21–38. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  285. Drews, J. (2018). Risikokommunikation und Krisenkommunikation. Kommunikation von Behörden und die Erwartungen von Journalisten [Risk communication and crisis com- munication. Communication of authorities and the expectations of journalists]. Wies- baden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  286. Dulinski, U. (2003). Sensationsjournalismus in Deutschland [Sensational journalism in Germany]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  287. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  288. Epkins, H. D. (2017). Covering acts of terrorism. In P. Robinson, P. M. Seib, & R. Fröhlich (Hrsg.), Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict and Security (S. 255–270). London, England: Routledge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  289. Esser, F. (1999). ‚Tabloidization’ of News. A Comparative Analysis of Anglo-American and German Press Journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14, 291–324. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  290. Focus (02. Februar 2009). Die deutsche Islamisten-AG. Wie Fanatiker den Terror planen [The German Islamist Association. How fanatics plan terror]. Focus, S. 1. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  291. Frindte, W., & Haußecker, N. (2010). Inszenierter Terrorismus: mediale Konstruktionen und individuelle Interpretationen [Staged terrorism: Media constructions and individ- ual interpretations]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  292. Früh, W. (2004). Inhaltsanalyse. Theorie und Praxis [Content analysis. Theory and prac- tice]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  293. Früh, W., & Frey, F. (2014). Narration und Storytelling: Theorie und empirische Befunde [Narration and storytelling: Theory and empirical findings]. Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  294. Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame-processing theory. Communication Theory, 25, 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12048 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  295. Geise, S., Lobinger, K., & Brantner, C. (2013). Fractured Paradigm? Theorien, Konzepte und Methoden der visuellen Framingforschung. Ergebnisse einer systematischen Litera- turschau [Fractured Paradigm? Theories, concepts and methods of visual framing re- search. Results of a systematic literature review]. In S. Geise & K. Lobinger (Hrsg.), Visual Framing. Perspektiven und Herausforderungen der Visuellen Kommunikations- forschung (S. 41–75). Köln, Germany: Herbert von Halem. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  296. Gerhards, J., Schäfer, M. S., Al Jabiri, I., & Seifert, J. (2011). Terrorismus im Fernsehen: Formate, Inhalte und Emotionen in westlichen und arabischen Sendern [Terrorism on television: Formats, contents and emotions in Western and Arabic channels]. Wies- baden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  297. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: The University of California Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  298. Glaab, S. (2007). Medien und Terrorismus: auf den Spuren einer symbiotischen Beziehung [Media and terrorism: On the tracks of a symbiotic relationship]. Berlin, Germany: BWV Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  299. Hafez, K., & Richter, C. (2008). Das Islambild von ARD und ZDF. Themenstrukturen einer Negativagenda [The image of Islam of ARD and ZDF. Thematic structures of a negative agenda]. Der Fachjournalist, 8, 10–16. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  300. Hagen, L. (1992). Die opportunen Zeugen. Konstruktionsmechanismen von Bias in der Zeitungsberichterstattung über die Volkszählungsdiskussion [The opportune witnesses. Construction mechanisms of bias in newspaper coverage of the census debate]. Pub- lizistik, 37, 444–460. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  301. Haim, M. (2019). Die Orientierung von Online-Journalismus an seinen Publika. Anforder- ung, Antizipation, Anspruch [The orientation of online journalism towards its audi- ences. Requirement, anticipation, demand]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  302. Heeren, J., & Zick, A. (2014). Misleading images. Results from interviews with media pro- ducers, journalists and consumers on Muslims and Islam in Germany. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 7, 46–63. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  303. Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Hrsg.), LEA’s communica-tion series. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (S. 139–161). New York, USA: Taylor & Francis. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  304. Holicki, S. (1993). Pressefoto und Pressetext im Wirkungsvergleich: Eine experimentelle Untersuchung am Beispiel von Politikerdarstellungen [Press photo and press text in a comparison of effects: An experimental study using the example of politicians]. München, Germany: Fischer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  305. Hummel, K., & Loginov, M. (Hrsg.) (2015). Gefährliche Nähe: Salafismus und Dschihad- ismus in Deutschland [Dangerous proximity: Salafism and Jihadism in Germany]. New York: Columbia University Press. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  306. Jirschitzka, J., Haußecker, N., & Frindte, W. (2010). Mediale Konstruktion II: Die Kon- struktion des Terrorismus im deutschen Fernsehen – Ergebnisdarstellung und Interpre- tation [Media Construction II: The construction of terrorism in German television – presentation and interpretation of results]. In W. Frindte & N. Haußecker (Hrsg.), Inszenierter Terrorismus: mediale Konstruktionen und individuelle Interpreta- tionen (S. 81–119). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  307. Kepplinger, H. M. (1989). Instrumentelle Aktualisierung: Grundlagen einer Theorie pub- lizistischer Konflikte [Opinion formation: Fundamentals of a theory of journalistic conflicts]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 29, 199–220. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  308. Kepplinger, H. M. (2011). Journalismus als Beruf [Journalism as profession]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  309. Kiousis, S. (2004). Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 U. S. Presidential Election. Journal of Communication, 54, 71–87. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  310. Kösters, R., & Friedrich, K. (2017). Doch mehr als Klatsch und Tratsch? [More than just gossip?]. In O. Jandura, M. Wendelin, M. Adolf, & J. Wimmer (Hrsg.), Zwischen Inte- gration und Diversifikation. Medien – Kultur – Kommunikation (S. 245–261). Wies- baden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  311. Krohne, H. W. (2010). Psychologie der Angst: Ein Lehrbuch [Psychology of fear: A text- book]. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  312. Krone.at (2019). Reichweiten-Erfolg. „Krone“: Auch online die meisten Leser! [Reach suc- cess. “Krone”: Most readers online too!] Abgerufen von https://www.krone.at/1897096 Landmeier, C., & Daschmann, G. (2011). Im Seichten kann man nicht ertrinken? Boule- vardisierung in der überregionalen deutschen Qualitätspresse [You can‘t drown in shal- low water? Boulevardisation in the national German quality press]. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof, & O. Jarren (Hrsg.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommu- nikation: Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (S. 177–191). Wiesbaden, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  313. Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  314. Lobinger, K. (2012). Visuelle Kommunikationsforschung: Medienbilder als Herausforder- ung für die Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. Medien – Kultur – Kommuni- kation [Visual communication research: Media images as a challenge for communica- tion and media science. Media – Culture – Communication]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93480-8 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  315. Lünenborg, M. (2005). Journalismus als kultureller Prozess: Zur Bedeutung von Journalismus in der Mediengesellschaft. Ein Entwurf [Journalism as a cultural process: On the signifi- cance of journalism in the media society. A draft]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  316. Martinsen, R. (2009). Öffentlichkeit in der „Mediendemokratie“ aus der Perspektive konkurrierender Demokratietheorien [Public sphere in “media democracy” from the perspective of competing theories of democracy]. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (Hrsg.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie (Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 42, Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  317. S. 37–69). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  318. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2004). Die empirische Erfassung von Medien-frames [The empirical measurement of media frames]. M&K Medien & Kommunikationswissen- schaft, 52, 56–75. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  319. Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative con- tent analysis. Basics and techniques]. Weinheim und Basel, Germany/Switzerland: Beltz. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  320. Media Analyse (2018). MA 2018 Presse [MA 2018 print]. Abgerufen von https://www. media-analyse.at/admin/pages/htmlTemplateTable.php?xyC at=402819,402820,402821,402822,402823,402824,402825,402909,402910,402913 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  321. ,402928,402955 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  322. Neidhardt, F., & Rucht, D. (1993). Auf dem Weg in die „Bewegungsgesellschaft“? Über die Stabilisierbarkeit sozialer Bewegungen [On the way to the “movement society”? On the stabilisation of social movements]. Soziale Welt, 305–326. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  323. Neumann, P. R. (2016). Der Terror ist unter uns. Dschihadismus und Radikalisierung in Europa [The terror is among us. Jihadism and radicalisation in Europe]. Berlin, Ger- many: Ullstein. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  324. Neumann, K. (2019). Medien und Islamismus. Der Einfluss von Medienberichterstattung und Propaganda auf islamistische Radikalisierungsprozesse [Media and Islamism. The influence of media coverage and propaganda on Islamist radicalization processes]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  325. ÖWA Plus (2019). Medienanalyse 2019-II [Media analysis 2019-II]. Abgerufen von http:// www.oewa.at/plus/medienanalyse Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  326. Ohliger, U. (2019). Kennzeichen und Wandel der Politikberichterstattung im Boulevard- journalismus [Characteristics and change of political reporting in tabloid journalism]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  327. Papacharissi, Z., & Fatima Oliveira, M. (2008). News frames terrorism: A comparative analysis of frames employed in terrorism coverage in US and UK newspapers. The In- ternational Journal of Press/Politics, 13, 52–74. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  328. Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good. KSG working paper 01-001. Online abgerufen von https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=257395 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  329. Pentzold, C., & Fraas, C. (2018). Verbale und visuelle Medienframes im Verfahrensrahmen der Grounded Theory analysieren. Methodologische Grundlagen, Methoden und Forschungspraxis deduktiven und induktiven Kodierens multimodaler Dokumente [Ana- lyse verbal and visual media frames within the procedural framework of Grounded The- ory. Methodological foundations, methods and research practice of deductive and induc- tive coding of multimodal documents]. In A. M. Scheu (Hg.), Auswertung qualitativer Daten. Strategien, Verfahren und Methoden der Interpretation nicht-standardisierter Daten in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (S. 227–243). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. Pfahl-Traughber, A. (2008). Islamismus – der neue Extremismus, Faschismus, Fundamen- talismus und Totalitarismus? Eine Erörterung zu Angemessenheit und Erklärungskraft der Zuordnungen [Islamism – the new extremism, fascism, fundamentalism and totali-tarianism? A discussion on the appropriateness and explanatory power of the attribu- tions]. Zeitschrift für Politik, 55, 33–48. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  330. Pörksen, B. (2015). Die Beobachtung des Beobachters. Eine Erkenntnistheorie der Journal- istik [The observation of the observer. An epistemology of journalism]. Heidelberg, Germany: Carl Auer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  331. Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., & Legnante, G. (2011). From hard vs. soft to a mul- ti-dimensional approach. Towards a standardized definition and measurement of dif- ferent types of news. Journalism, 13, 1–19. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  332. Renger, R. (2000). Populärer Journalismus. Nachrichten zwischen Fakten und Fiktion [Pop- ular journalism. News between fact and fiction]. Innsbruck, Austria: Studien-Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  333. Renner, K. N., & Schupp, K. (2017). Journalismus [Journalism]. In M. Martínez (Hg.), Erzählen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch (S. 122–132). Stuttgart, Germany: J. B. Met- zler Verlag. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  334. Rossmann, C., & Brosius, H. B. (2013). Die Risiken der Risikokommunikation und die Rolle der Massenmedien [The risks of risk communication and the role of the mass me- dia]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 56, 118–123. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  335. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  336. Scheufele, B., & Engelmann, I. (2016). Framing und Journalismus [Framing and journal- ism]. In M. Löffelholz & L. Rothenberger (Hrsg.), Handbuch Journalismustheorien (S. 443–456). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  337. Schirmer, S. (2001). Die Titelseiten-Aufmacher der BILD-Zeitung im Wandel. Eine Inhalt- sanalyse unter Berücksichtigung von Merkmalen journalistischer Qualität [The front page headlines of the BILD newspaper in transition. A content analysis taking into ac- count characteristics of journalistic quality]. München, Germany: R. Fischer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  338. Schulz, W. (1976). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien. Analyse der aktuellen Berichterstattung [The construction of reality in the news media. Analysis of current reporting]. Freiburg, München, Germany: Alber. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  339. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549-570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  340. Slovic, P. (Hg.). (2000). Risk, society, and policy series. The perception of risk. London, England: Earthscan Publications. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  341. Staab, J. F. (1990): Nachrichtenwerttheorie: Formale Struktur und empirischer Gehalt [Message value theory: formal structure and empirical content]. Freiburg, München, Germany: Alber. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  342. Steinmaurer, T. (2012). Medien und Medienpolitik in Österreich – ein Überblick [Media and media politics in Austria – an overview]. Abgerufen von http://www.politischebil- dung.com/pdfs/35steinmaurer.pdf Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  343. Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press cover- age of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20 (4), 484–507. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058253 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  344. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & De Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall. Communication research, 26, 550–569. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  345. von Sikorski, C., Matthes, J., & Schmuck, D. (2018). The Islamic State in the news: Journal- istic differentiation of Islamist terrorism from Islam, terror news proximity, and Islamo- phobic attitudes. Communication Research, https://doi.org/0093650218803276. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  346. von Sikorski, C., Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Binder, A. (2017). “Muslims are not Terror- ists”: Islamic State coverage, journalistic differentiation between terrorism and Islam, fear reactions, and attitudes toward Muslims. Mass Communication and Society, 20, 825–848. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  347. Wälder, K., & Wälder, O. (2017). Methoden zur Risikomodellierung und des Risikomana- gements [Methods of risk modelling and the risk management]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  348. Wendelin, M., Engelmann, I., & Neubarth, J. (2017). User Rankings and Journalistic News Selection. Journalism Studies, 18, 135–153, https://doi.org/10.1080/146167 0X.2015.1040892. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  349. Quellen Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  350. B3: https://www.krone.at/545258 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B47: https://www.krone.at/603609 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B41: https://www.krone.at/480939 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B124: https://www.krone.at/422810 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B136: https://www.krone.at/429587 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B214: https://www.krone.at/1685984 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B206: https://www.krone.at/1907722 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B115: https://www.krone.at/429266 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B211: https://www.krone.at/1691554 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B67: https://www.krone.at/549888 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B111: https://www.krone.at/582006 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B210: https://www.krone.at/1819894 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B5: https://www.krone.at/603105 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B188: https://www.krone.at/599350 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B127: https://www.krone.at/1819324 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B208: https://www.krone.at/1877670 [nicht mehr verfügbar, 23.08.2020] B73: https://www.krone.at/1876494 [nicht mehr verfügbar, 23.08.2020] B45: https://www.krone.at/594485 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  351. B96: https://www.krone.at/550201 [nicht mehr vollständig verfügbar, 23.08.2020] B130: https://www.krone.at/484405 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  352. B98: https://www.krone.at/439228 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B93: https://www.krone.at/425187 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B166: https://www.krone.at/1608661 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B31: https://www.krone.at/1686147 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B48: https://www.krone.at/601586 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B78: https://www.krone.at/509740 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B66: https://www.krone.at/551029 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B146: https://www.krone.at/410063 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B36: https://www.krone.at/1751886 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B100: https://www.krone.at/465836 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B90: https://www.krone.at/426148 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B1: https://www.krone.at/1724076 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B30: https://www.krone.at/1713999 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445
  353. B19: https://www.krone.at/533063 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B40: https://www.krone.at/1669361 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B32: https://www.krone.at/522971 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B50: https://www.krone.at/1662117 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B107: https://www.krone.at/483895 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B25: https://www.krone.at/484136 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B177: https://www.krone.at/422295 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B2: https://www.krone.at/595540 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B157: https://www.krone.at/598704 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B181: https://www.krone.at/550602 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B140: https://www.krone.at/1891313 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B14: https://www.krone.at/585126 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B65: https://www.krone.at/566686 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B11: https://www.krone.at/419351 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B1: https://www.krone.at/1724076 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] B199: https://www.krone.at/534453 [zuletzt abgerufen am 23.08.2020] Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/2192-4007-2020-3-445

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media