Nachhaltigkeit kultivieren. Öffentliche Kommunikation über Umwelt, Klima, nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transformation

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: Communicatio Socialis (ComSoc) Volume 55 (2022), Issue 2
Full access

Communicatio Socialis (ComSoc)

Volume 55 (2022), Issue 2

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2022
ISSN-Online
2198-3852
ISSN-Print
0010-3497

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 55 (2022), Issue 2

Nachhaltigkeit kultivieren. Öffentliche Kommunikation über Umwelt, Klima, nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transformation

Authors:
ISSN-Print
0010-3497
ISSN-Online
2198-3852
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Allen, Myria (2016): Strategic Communication for Sustainable Organizations. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  2. Theory and Practice. Fayetteville. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  3. Bilandzic, Helena/Sukalla, Freya (2019): The Role of Fictional Film Exposure and Narrative Engagement for Personal Norms, Guilt and Intentions to Protect The Climate. In: Environmental Communication, 13. Jg., H. 8, S. 1069-1086, DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2019.1575259. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  4. Bonfadelli, Heinz (2007): Nachhaltigkeit als Herausforderung für Medien und Journalismus. In: Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften: Nachhaltigkeitsforschung – Perspektiven der Sozial-und Geisteswissenschaften, Bern, S. 255-279. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  5. Brüggemann, Michael/Engesser, Sven (2017): Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change. In: Global Environmental Change, H. 42, S. 58-67, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.004. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  6. Brüggemann, Michael/Frech, Jannis/Schäfer, Torsten (2021): Transformative Journalisms: How the ecological crisis is transforming journalism. In: Hansen, Anders (Hg.): The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. 2nd Edition. New York, DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mqv5w. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  7. Bucchi, Massimiano/Trench, Brian (2021): Rethinking science communication as the social conversation around science. In: Journal of Science Communication, 20. Jg., H. 3, Y01, DOI: 10.22323/2.20030401. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  8. Culloty, Eileen et al. (2019): Researching visual representations of climate change. In: Environmental Communication, 13. Jg., H. 2, S. 179-191, DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1533877. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  9. Dahl, Trine (2022): Global Villain, but Local Hero? A Linguistic Analysis of Climate Narratives from the Fossil Fuel Sector. In: Applied Linguistics, 43. Jg., H. 1, S. 1-20, DOI: 10.1093/applin/amab003. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  10. Davis, Lloyd et al. (2018): Environmental Communication and Science Communication – Conversations, Connections and Collaborations. In: Environmental Communication, 12. Jg., H. 4, S. 431-437, DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1436082. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  11. Eggers, Daniel (2021): Medienethik: Vier populäre Irrtümer. In: Publizistik, 66. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  12. Jg., H. 3, S. 537-564, DOI: 10.1007/s11616-021-00669-w. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  13. Fischer, Daniel/Haucke, Franziska (2016): Die Verwendung von „Nachhaltigkeit“ in deutschen Zeitungen: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Medienanalyse. In: Michelsen, Gerd/Fischer, Daniel (Hg.): Nachhaltigkeit und Journalismus: Erkenntnisse und Impulse aus Wissenschaft und Praxis. Bad Homburg, S. 55-68. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  14. Fischhoff, Baruch (2013): The sciences of science communication. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110. Jg. (Supplement 3), S. 14033-14039, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213273110. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  15. Funiok, Rüdiger (2002): Medienethik: Trotz Stolpersteinen ist der Wertediskurs über Medien unverzichtbar. In: Karmasin, Matthias (Hg.): Medien und Ethik. Stuttgart, S. 37-58. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  16. Giddens, Anthony (1986): The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  17. Godemann, Jasmin (2011): Sustainable communication as an inter-and transdisciplinary discipline. In: Godemann, Jasmin/Michelsen, Gerd (Hg.): Sustainability communication. Heidelberg u. a., S. 39-51. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  18. Godeman, Jasmin/Michelsen, Gerd (2011): Sustainability Communication - An Introduction. In: Godeman, Jasmin/Michelsen, Gerd (Hg.): Sustainability Communication. Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoretical Foundation. Heidelberg u. a.. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  19. Hallahan, Kirk (2007): Defining strategic communication. In: International journal of strategic communication, 1. Jg., H. 1, S. 3-35, DOI: 10.1080/15531180701285244. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  20. Holt, Diane/Barkemeyer, Ralf (2012): Media coverage of sustainable development issues–attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? In: Sustainable development, 20. Jg., H. 1, S. 1-17, DOI: 10.1002/sd.460. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  21. Holz, Hans Heinz (2005): Weltentwurf und Reflexion: Versuch einer Grundlegung der Dialektik. Stuttgart. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  22. Hornsey, Matthew J./Harris, Emily A./Fielding, Kelly S. (2018): Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. In: Nature Climate Change, 8. Jg., H. 7, S. 614-620, DOI: 10.1038/ s41558-018-0157-2. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  23. Horst, Maja/Davies, Sarah R. (2021): Science Communication as Culture: A framework for Analysis. In: Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. New York, S. 182-197. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  24. Hurst, Bree/Johnston, Kim A. (2021): The social imperative in public relations: Utilities of social impact, social license and engagement. In: Public Relations Review, 47. Jg., H. 2, 102039, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102039. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  25. Jamieson, Kathleen H./Kahan, Dan/Scheufele, Dietram A. (Hg.) (2017): The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication. Oxford. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  26. Kannengießer, Sigrid (2020): Nachhaltigkeit und das „gute Leben“. In: Publizistik, 65. Jg., H. 1, S. 7-20, DOI: 10.1007/s11616-019-00536-9. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  27. Kannengießer, Sigrid (2021): Sozial-ökologische Transformationsforschung: Desiderata der Kommunikation- und Medienwissenschaft. In: Borchers, Nils S. et al. (Hg.): Transformation der Medien – Medien der Transformation. Verhandlungen des Netzwerks Kritische Kommunikationswissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main, S. 245-259, DOI: 10.53291/QNCO5200. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  28. Karmasin, Matthias/Voci, Denise (2021): The role of sustainability in media and communication studies’ curricula throughout Europe. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21. Jg., H. 8, S.42-68, DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0380. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  29. Krainer, Larissa/Trattnig, Rita (Hg.) (2007): Kulturelle Nachhaltigkeit. Konzepte, Perspektiven, Positionen. München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  30. Krainer, Larissa/Weder, Franzisca (2011): Editorial. Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation. In: MedienJournal, 35. Jg., H. 1, S. 2-3. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  31. Lam, Jaqueline C. K./ Walker, Richard M./Hills, Peter (2014): Interdisciplinarity in Sustainability Studies: A Review. In: Sustainable Development, 22. Jg., H. 3, S. 158-176, DOI: 10.1002/sd.533. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  32. Meyers, Robert A. (Hg.) (2012): Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. New York. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  33. Newig, Jens et al. (2013): Communication Regarding Sustainability: Conceptual Perspectives and Exploration of Societal Subsystems. In: Sustainability, 5. Jg., H. 7, S. 2976-2990, DOI: 10.3390/su5072976. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  34. Panu, Pihkala (2020). Anxiety and the Ecological Crisis: An Analysis of Eco-Anxiety and Climate Anxiety. In: Sustainability, 12. Jg., H. 19, S. 7836. DOI: 10.3390/su12197836. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  35. Rasche, Andreas/Morsing, Mette/Moon, Jeremy (Hg.) (2017): Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy, Communication, Governance. Cambridge. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  36. Rath, Matthias (2002): Medienqualität zwischen Empirie und Ethik. Zur Notwendigkeit des normativen und empirischen Projekts, „Media Assessment“. In: Karmasin, Matthias (Hg.): Medien und Ethik. Stuttgart, S. 59-76. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  37. Robertson, Margaret (2019): Communicating sustainability. Abingdon. Schäfer, Mike S./Painter, James (2021): Climate journalism in a changing me- Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  38. dia ecosystem: Assessing the production of climate change‐related news around the world. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12. Jg., H. 1, e675. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.675. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  39. Schicha, Christian (2019): Medienethik. München. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  40. Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew et al. (2020): Environmental Literature as Persuasion: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Reading Climate Fiction. In: Environmental Communication, 14. Jg., DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2020.1814377. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  41. Soini, Katriina/Dessein, Joost (2016): Culture-Sustainability Relation: Towards a Conceptual Framework. In: Sustainability, 8. Jg, H. 2, S. 167, DOI: 10.3390/su8020167. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  42. Taddicken, Monika/Reif, Anne/Hoppe, Imke/ (2018): What do people know about climate change – and how confident are they? On measurements and analyses of science related knowledge. In: Journal of Science Communication, 17. Jg., H. 3, S. 1-26, DOI: 10.22323/2.17030201. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  43. Taddicken, Monika/Reif, Anne/Hoppe, Imke (2018): Wissen, Nichtwissen, Unwissen, Unsicherheit: Zur Operationalisierung und Auswertung von Wissensitems am Beispiel des Klimawissens. In: Janich, Nina/Rhein, Lisa (Hg.): Unsicherheit als Herausforderung für die Wissenschaft: Reflexion aus Natur-, Sozial-und Geisteswissenschaften. Bern, S. 113-140. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  44. Takahashi, Bruno et al. (2021): Expanding Conceptualizations of Environmental Communication Research. In: Takahashi, Bruno et al. (Hg.): The Handbook of International Trends in Environmental Communication. New York/ London, S. 3-13. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  45. UN (2022): Sustainable Development Goals. http://sdgs.un.org (zuletzt aufgerufen am 11.4.2022). Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  46. Weder, Franzisca (2021a): Sustainability as Master Frame of the Future? Potency and Limits of Sustainability as Normative Framework in Corporate, Political and NGO Communication. In: Weder, Franzisca/Krainer, Larissa/Karmasin, Matthias (Hg.): The Sustainability Communication Reader. A Reflective Compendium. Wiesbaden, S. 103-119. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  47. Weder, Franzisca (2021b): Nachhaltigkeit als kulturelle Praxis. In: Lurz, Birgit/ Schlag, Wolfgang/Wolkinger, Thomas: Playbook Klimakultur. Strategien für einen nachhaltigen Kulturwandel. Hrsg. vom Bundesministerium für europäische und internationle Angelegenheiten. Wien, S. 22-30. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146
  48. Weder, Franzisca/Einwiller, Sabine/Eberwein, Tobias (2019): Heading for new shores: Impact orientation of CSR communication and the need for communicative responsibility. In: Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24. Jg., H. 2, S. 198-211, DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ-02-2019-0020. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/0010-3497-2022-2-146

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media