Modellbasierte Überwachung von Fräsprozessen/Condition-specific models for universal process monitoring – Model-based monitoring of milling processes

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: wt Werkstattstechnik online Volume 115 (2025), Issue 05
Open Access Full access

wt Werkstattstechnik online

Volume 115 (2025), Issue 05

Authors:
Publisher
VDI fachmedien, Düsseldorf
Copyright Year
2025
ISSN-Online
1436-4980
ISSN-Print
1436-4980

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Volume 115 (2025), Issue 05

Modellbasierte Überwachung von Fräsprozessen/Condition-specific models for universal process monitoring – Model-based monitoring of milling processes

Authors:
ISSN-Print
1436-4980
ISSN-Online
1436-4980
Preview:

Data-based process monitoring makes it possible to precisely analyze milling processes and detect anomalies at an early stage – without the need to retrofit additional sensors. By using specialized models and self-learning mechanisms, varying production conditions can be efficiently mapped, thereby increasing overall equipment effectiveness and manufacturing quality in production environments with

 

a high number of variants.

Bibliography

  1. [1] Peichl, A.; Sauer, S.; Wohlrabe, K.: Fachkräftemangel in Deutschland und Europa – Historie, Status quo und was getan werden muss. ifo Schnelldienst Nr. 10 (2022), S. 70–75 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  2. [2] Gönnheimer, P.; Netzer, M.; Lange, C. et al.: Datenaufnahme und -verarbeitung in der Brownfield-Produktion: Studie zum Stand der Digitalisierung und bestehenden Herausforderung im Produktionsumfeld. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb 117 (2022) 5, S. 317–320 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  3. [3] Samochowiec, J.; Bauer, J.; Neumüller, K.: Strategies for dealing with the labour shortage – An overview. SSRN Journal (2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  4. [4] Hadad, Y.; Keren, B.: A revised method for allocating the optimum number of similar machines to operators. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 65 (2016) 2, pp. 223–244 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  5. [5] Abellan-Nebot, J. V.; Romero Subirón, F.: A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 47 (2010) 1–4, pp. 237–257 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  6. [6] Hansjosten, M.; Bott, A.; Puchta, A. et al.: Model-Based Diagnosis of Feed Axes with Contactless Current Sensing. In: Liewald, M.; Verl, A.; Bauernhansl, T.; Möhring, H.-C. (Hrsg.): Production at the Leading Edge of Technology. Lecture Notes in Production Engineering. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2023), pp. 314–323 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  7. [7] Mohanraj, T.; Kirubakaran, E. S.; Madheswaran, D. K. et al.: Review of advances in tool condition monitoring techniques in the milling process. Measurement Science and Technology 35 (2024) 9, pp. 092002. Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  8. [8] Möhring, H.-C.; Litwinski, K. M.; Gümmer, O.: Process monitoring with sensory machine tool components. CIRP Annals 59 (2010) 1, pp. 383–386 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  9. [9] Xi, T.; Benincá, I. M.; Kehne, S. et al.: Tool wear monitoring in roughing and finishing processes based on machine internal data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 113 (2021) 11–12, pp. 3543–3554 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  10. [10] Brillinger, M.; Wuwer, M.; Abdul Hadi, M. et al.: Energy prediction for CNC machining with machine learning. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 35 (2021), pp. 715–723 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  11. [11] Schmitt, A.-M.; Miller, E.; Engelmann, B. et al.: G-code evaluation in CNC milling to predict energy consumption through Machine Learning. Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 8 (2024), pp. 100140 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  12. [12] Netzer, M.; Bach, J.; Puchta, A. et al.: Process Segmented based Intelligent Anomaly Detection in Highly Flexible Production Machines under Low Machine Data Availability. Procedia CIRP 107 (2022), pp. 647–652 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  13. [13] Ströbel, R.; Probst, Y.; Deucker, S. et al.: Time Series Prediction for Energy Consumption of Computer Numerical Control Axes Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models. Machines 11 (2023) 11, pp. 1015 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  14. [14] Ströbel, R.; Mau, M.; Hafez, K. et al.: Training and validation dataset 3 of milling processes for time series prediction. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (2024) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6
  15. [15] Geurts, P.; Ernst, D.; Wehenkel, L.: Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learn 63 (2006) 1, pp. 3–42 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.37544/1436-4980-2025-05-6

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media