Die Konstruktion eines außenpolitischen Gegners Das Chinabild im US-Präsidentschaftswahlkampf 2012

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of Volume: ZPol Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft Volume 24 (2014), Edition 1-2
Full access

Journal of Political Science

Volume 24 (2014), Edition 1-2

Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2014
ISSN-Online
1430-6387
ISSN-Print
1430-6387

Chapter information

Full access

Volume 24 (2014), Edition 1-2

Die Konstruktion eines außenpolitischen Gegners Das Chinabild im US-Präsidentschaftswahlkampf 2012

Authors:
ISSN-Print
1430-6387
ISSN-Online
1430-6387
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Al-Rodhan, Khalid R., 2007: A Critique of the China Threat Theory: A Systematic Analysis, Asian Perspective 31 (3), 41-66. Open Google Scholar
  2. Ashley, Richard K., 1984: The Poverty of Neorealism, IO 38 (2), 225-286. Open Google Scholar
  3. Baumann, Rainer, 2006: Der Wandel des deutschen Multilateralismus. Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung deutscher Außenpolitik, Baden-Baden (1. Aufl.). Open Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, Richard/Munro, Ross H., 1997: The Coming Conflict with America, Foreign Affairs 76 (2), 18-32. Open Google Scholar
  5. Brezinski, Zbigniew, 2005: Clash of the Titans, Foreign Policy (146), 46-50. Open Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, David, 1992: Writing security. United States foreign policy and the politics of identity, Manchester. Open Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, David, 1993: Politics without principle. Sovereignty, ethics, and the narratives of the Gulf War, Boulder, Colorado. Open Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, David, 2007: Poststructuralism, in: Tim Dunne/Milja Kurke/Steve Smith (Hrsg.), International relations theories. Discipline and diversity, Oxford/New York, 203-228. Open Google Scholar
  9. Corbin, Juliet M./Strauss, Anselm L., 2008: Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Los Angeles (3. Aufl.). Open Google Scholar
  10. Dalby, Simon, 1990: Creating the second cold war. The discourse of politics, London/New York. Open Google Scholar
  11. De Vries, Tity, 2012: The 1967 Central Intelligence Agency Scandal. Catalyst in a Transforming Relationship between State and People, Journal of American History 98 (4), 1075-1092. Open Google Scholar
  12. Debrix, François, 2002: Language as Criticism: Assessing the Merits of Speech Acts and Discursive Formations in International Relations, New Political Science 24 (2), 201-219. Open Google Scholar
  13. Der Derian, James/Shapiro, Michael J., 1989: International/Intertextual Relations. Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Lexington, MA. Open Google Scholar
  14. Dörner, Andreas/Vogt, Ludgera, 2002: Der Wahlkampf als Ritual. Zur Inszenierung der Demokratie in der Multioptionsgesellschaft, APuZ B 15-16, 15-22. Open Google Scholar
  15. Doty, Roxanne L., 1993: Foreign Policy as Social Construction. A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines, International Studies Quarterly 37 (3), 297-320. Open Google Scholar
  16. Edelman, Murray, 1976: Politik als Ritual. Die symbolische Funktion staatlicher Institutionen und politischen Handelns, Frankfurt a. M./New York. Open Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, Charlotte, 2010: Who speaks? Discourse, the subject and the study of identity in international politics, EJIR 17 (2), 327-350. Open Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, Michel, 1980: Power/knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, New York. Open Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, Michel, 1981: Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, Michel, 1997: Archäologie des Wissens, Frankfurt a. M. Open Google Scholar
  21. Friedberg, Aaron L., 2005: The Future of U.S.-China Relations. Is Conflict Inevitable?, International Security 30 (2), 7-45. Open Google Scholar
  22. Friedberg, Aaron L., 2011: A contest for supremacy. China, America, and the struggle for mastery in Asia, New York. Open Google Scholar
  23. George, Jim, 1994: Discourses of global politics. A critical (re)introduction to international relations, Boulder, Colorado. Open Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, Lene, 1997: A Case for Seduction?: Evaluating the Poststructuralist Conceptualization of Security, Cooperation and Conflict 32 (4), 369-397. Open Google Scholar
  25. Hansen, Lene, 2006: Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war, New York. Open Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, Lene, 2011: Poststructuralism, in: John Baylis/Steve Smith/Patricia Owens (Hrsg.), The Globalization of World Politics, New York/Oxford (5th edition),166-178. Open Google Scholar
  27. Hays Gries, Peter, 2007: Harmony, Hegemony & US-China Relations, World Literature Today 81 (4), 44-47. Open Google Scholar
  28. Herborth, Benjamin, 2010: Rekonstruktive Forschungslogik, in: Carlo Masala/Frank Sauer/Andreas Wilhelm (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Internationalen Politik, Wiesbaden (1. Aufl.), 265-284. Open Google Scholar
  29. Holland, Jack, 2010: Howard’s War on Terror: A Conceivable, Communicable and Coercive Foreign Policy Discourse, Australian Journal of Political Science 45 (4), 643-661. Open Google Scholar
  30. Holland, Jack, 2013: Foreign policy and political possibility, European Journal of International Relations 19 (1), 49-68. Open Google Scholar
  31. Ikenberry, G. John, 2008: The Rise of China and the Future of the West, Foreign Affairs 87 (1), 23-37. Open Google Scholar
  32. Keller, Reiner, 2011: Diskursforschung. Eine Einführung für SozialwissenschaftlerInnen, Wiesbaden (4. Aufl.). Open Google Scholar
  33. Laclau, Ernesto/Mouffe, Chantal, 2000: Hegemonie und radikale Demokratie: Zur Dekonstruktion des Marxismus, Wien. Open Google Scholar
  34. Mearsheimer, John J., 2001: The tragedy of Great Power politics, New York. Open Google Scholar
  35. Mearsheimer, John J., 2004: Why China’s Rise Will Not Be Peaceful, Unpublished manuscript, http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0034b.pdf, (Stand: 03.02.14). Open Google Scholar
  36. Mearsheimer, John J., 2005: Clash of the Titans, Foreign Policy (146), 46-50. Open Google Scholar
  37. Mey, Günter/Mruck, Katja, 2011: Grounded-Theory-Methodologie. Entwicklung, Stand, Perspektiven, in: Günter Mey/Katja Mruck (Hrsg.), Grounded Theory Reader, Wiesbaden, 11-48. Open Google Scholar
  38. Milliken, Jennifer, 1999: The Study of Discourse in International Relations. A Critique of Research and Methods, EJIR 5 (2), 225-254. Open Google Scholar
  39. Nabers, Dirk, 2009: Filling the Void of Meaning. Identity Construction in U.S. Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001, Foreign Policy Analysis 5 (2), 191-214. Open Google Scholar
  40. Nonhoff, Martin, 2011: Konstruktivistisch-pragmatische Methodik. Ein Plädoyer für die Diskursanalyse, ZIB 18 (2), 91-107. Open Google Scholar
  41. Nonhoff, Martin, 2007: Diskurs, radikale Demokratie, Hegemonie - Einleitung, in: Martin Nonhoff (Hrsg.), Diskurs - radikale Demokratie - Hegemonie. Zum politischen Denken von Ernesto Laclau und Chantal Mouffe, Bielefeld, 7-24. Open Google Scholar
  42. Nye, Joseph S., 1995: The Case for Deep Engagement, Foreign Affairs 74 (4), 90-102. Open Google Scholar
  43. Nye, Joseph S., 2006: The Challenge of China, in: Steven Van Evera (Hrsg.), How to make America Safe, http://www.tobinproject.org/sites/tobinproject.org/files/assets/ Make_America_Safe_The_Challenge_Of_China.pdf (Stand: 03.02.14), 73-78. Open Google Scholar
  44. Pan, Chengxin, 2004: The “China Threat” in American Self-Imagination. The Discursive Construction of Other as Power Politics, Alternatives 29 (3), 305-331. Open Google Scholar
  45. Pan, Chengxin, 2012: Knowledge, Desire and Power in Global Politics. Western Representations of China’s Rise, Cheltenham/Northampton. Open Google Scholar
  46. Roos, Ulrich, 2010: Deutsche Außenpolitik. Eine Rekonstruktion der grundlegenden Handlungsregeln, Wiesbaden (1. Aufl.). Open Google Scholar
  47. Roos, Ulrich, 2012: Deutsche Außenpolitik nach der Vereinigung. Zwischen ernüchtertem Idealismus und realpolitischem Weltordnungsstreben, ZIB (2/2012), 7-40. Open Google Scholar
  48. Ross, Robert S., 2005: Assessing the China Threat, National Interest (81), 81-87. Open Google Scholar
  49. Roy, Denny, 2013: More Security for Rising China, Less for Others?, AsiaPacific Issues (106), 1-8. Open Google Scholar
  50. Sarcinelli, Ulrich, 1987: Symbolische Politik. Zur Bedeutung symbolischen Handelns in der Wahlkampfkommunikation der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Opladen. Open Google Scholar
  51. Shambaugh, David, 2003: Imagining Demons. The rise of negative imagery in US-China relations, Journal of Contemporary China 12 (35), 235-237. Open Google Scholar
  52. Shambaugh, David, 2011: Introduction. Whither China?, in: David Shambaugh (Hrsg.), Charting China’s future, New York u. a., 1-13. Open Google Scholar
  53. Sjöstedt, Roxanne, 2007: The Discursive Origins of a Doctrine. Foreign Policy Analysis 3 (3), 233-254. Open Google Scholar
  54. Stritzel, Holger, 2012: Securitization, power, intertextuality. Discourse theory and the translations of organized crime, Security Dialogue 43 (6), 549-567. Open Google Scholar
  55. Waever, Ole, 2001: Identity, communities and foreign policy. Discourse analysis as foreign policy theory, in: Lene Hansen/Ole Waever (Hrsg.), European integration and national identity, London/New York, 20-49. Open Google Scholar
  56. Waever, Ole/Buzan, Barry/De Wilde, Jaap, 1998: Security. A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, Colorado. Open Google Scholar
  57. Warner, Geoffrey, 2011: Leaving Vietnam. Nixon, Kissinger and Ford, 1969-1975. Part one, International Affairs 87 (6), 1485-1506. Open Google Scholar
  58. Wendt, Alexander, 1992: Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics, IO 46 (2), 391-425. Open Google Scholar

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF)

Share via email

Media