Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
, to see if you have full access to this publication.
Volume No access

Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08

Bauingenieur
Authors:
Journal:
Bauingenieur
Publisher:
 2024

Bibliographic data

ISSN-Print
0005-6650
ISSN-Online
0005-6650
Publisher
VDI fachmedien, Düsseldorf
Language
German
Product type
Volume

Articles

Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page 1 - 5
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page A 6 - A 8
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page A 9 - A 10
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page A 11 - A 13
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page A 15 - A 18
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page A 22 - A 23
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page A 24 - A 26
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page S 1 - S 1
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page S 2 - S 7
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page S 8 - S 18
This study examines whether a simplified contemporary calculation model for damaged points of a reinforced concrete frame node matches the test results. The calculation method determines in advance the final damage caused by earthquake stress in...
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page S 19 - S 25
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page 217 - 222
The SMS Group bundles its locations on the new campus in Mönchengladbach. The central roof, a transparent Geigerdome with a diameter of 82 metres at a level of 20 metres above ground, rests on altogether 5 office modules. At the new headquarters...
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page 223 - 230
During the restoration of historic reinforced concrete slabs at Tempelhof Airport Berlin, comprehensive planning and construction work is being carried out, which considers extensive preliminary investigations of the existing structure, heritage...
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page 231 - 243
Simulation results are presented to illustrate new methods and models for analyzing irreversible damage processes in wooden structures. The new developments include methods for the simulation of hygro-mechanical long-term loading, of crack...
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page 244 - 253
For the re-analysis and assessment of bridge structures, different approaches are currently used in Germany for the determination of shear capacity. With the proposed shear capacity model for level 2 of the German guideline...
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:
Cover of Volume: Bauingenieur Volume 99 (2024), Edition 07-08
Article
No access

Page 254 - 261
In Austria, the ONR 24810 guideline currently regulates technical rockfall protection. It specifies that rockfall protection measures (at slope scale) should be dimensioned on the so-called design block (V95-V98). The design block method is...
VDI Fachmedien GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf 2024
Authors:

Bibliography (176)

  1. [1] E DIN EN 1998–4:2023–09 – Entwurf: Eurocode 8: Auslegung von Bauwerken gegen Erdbeben – Teil 4: Silos, Tankbauwerke und Rohrleitungen, Türme, Maste und Schornsteine; Deutsche und Englische Fassung prEN 1998–4:2023. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  2. [2] DIN EN 1998–4:2007–01: Eurocode 8: Auslegung von Bauwerken gegen Erdbeben – Teil 4: Silos, Tankbauwerke und Rohrleitungen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  3. [3] O´Rourke, M.J.; Bloom, M.C.; Dobry, R.: Apparent propagation velocity of body waves. In: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 10 (1982), pp. 283–294. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  4. [4] Butenweg, Ch.; Schmitt, T.; Rosen, B.: Seismische Einwirkungen auf erdverlegte Rohrleitungssysteme. In: Bauingenieur 89 (2014), Heft 7/8, S. 316–324. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  5. [5] DIN EN 1998–1/NA (2011): Nationaler Anhang – National festgelegte Parameter – Eurocode 8: Auslegung von Bauwerken gegen Erdbeben – Teil 1: Grundlagen, Erdbebeneinwirkungen und Regeln für Hochbau. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  6. [6] Schmitt, T.; Butenweg, Ch.: Seismische Einwirkungen auf erdverlegte Rohrleitungssysteme – Parameterstudie. In: SGEB (Hrsg.): Tagungsband der 14. D-A-C-H Tagung, Zürich, 2015, S. 199–206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  7. [7] E DIN EN 1998–1–1:2022–10 – Entwurf: Eurocode 8 – Auslegung von Bauwerken gegen Erdbeben – Teil 1–1: Grundlagen und Erdbebeneinwirkung; Deutsche und Englische Fassung prEN 1998–1–1:2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  8. [8] Al-Atik, L.; Abrahamson, N. A.: An improved method for nonstationary spectral matching. In: Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 26 (2010), Iss. 6, pp. 601–617. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  9. [9] Abrahamson, N. A.: Non-stationary spectral matching. In: Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 63 (1992), Iss. 1, p. 30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-28
  10. [1] Tsonos, A.G.: Seismic repair of exterior R/C beam-to-column joints using two-sided and three-sided jackets. In: Struct. Eng. Mech., Vol. 13 (2002), Iss. 1, pp. 17–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  11. [2] Tsonos, A.G.: Cyclic load behaviour of reinforced concrete beam-column subassemblages of modern structures. In: ACI Struct. J., Vol. 194 (2007), Iss. 4, pp. 468–478. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  12. [3] Park, R.; Paulay, T.: Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley Publications, New York, NY, USA, 1975. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  13. [4] Tsonos, A.G.: Lateral load response of strengthened reinforced concrete beam-to-column joints. In: ACI Struct. J., Proc., Vol. 96 (1999), Iss. 1, pp. 46–56. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  14. [5] Tsonos, A.G.: Seismic retrofit of R/C beam-to-column joints using local three-sided jackets. In: J. Eur. Earthq. Eng., Vol. 1 (2001a), pp. 48–64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  15. [6] Tsonos, A.G.: Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced concrete joints by the removal and replacement technique. In: J. Eur. Earthq. Eng., Vol. 3 (2001b), pp. 29–43. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  16. [7] Tsonos, A.G.: Seismic repair of exterior R/C beam-to-column joints using two-sided and three-sided jackets. In: Struct. Eng. Mech., Vol. 13 (2002), Iss. 1, pp. 17–34. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  17. [8] Tsonos, A.G.: Effectiveness of CFRP – jackets and RC – jackets in post-earthquake and pre-earthquake retrofitting of beam-column subassemblages. In: Eng. Struct., Vol. 30 (2008), pp. 777–793. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  18. [9] Tsonos, A.G.: Performance enhancement of R/C building columns and beam-column joints through shotcrete jacketing. In: Eng. Struct., Vol. 32 (2010), pp. 726–740. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  19. [10] Rossetto, T.; Pohoryles, D.A.; Melo, J. et al.: The effect of slab and transverse beams on the behaviour of full-scale pre-1970‘s RC beam-column joints. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  20. [11] Yurdakul, Ö; Avsar, Ö.: Strengthening of substandard reinforced concrete beam-column joints by external post-tension rods. In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 107 (2016), pp. 9–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  21. [12] Pohoryles, D.A.; Melo, J.; Rossetto, T. et al.: Seismic Retrofit Schemes with FRP for Deficient RC Beam-Column Joints. State-of-the-Art Review, 2016. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000950. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  22. [13] Bossio, A.; Fabbrocino, F.; Lignola, G.P. et al.: Simplified Model for Strengthening Design of Beam–Column Internal Joints in Reinforced Concrete Frames. In: Polymers, Vol. 7 (2015), pp. 1732–1754. doi.10.3390/polym7091479. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  23. [14] Kam, W.Y. et al.: Influence of slab on the seismic response of sub-standard detailed of sub-standard detailed exterior reinforced concrete beam column joints. 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Reaching Beyond Borders. Toronto, Canada, 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  24. [15] Tsonos, A.G.: Ultra-high-performance performance fiber concrete: An innovative solution for strengthening old R/C structures and for improving the FRP strengthening method. In: WIT Transactions on Engineering Series, Vol. 64 (2009), pp. 273–284. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  25. [16] Karayannis, C.G.; Golias, E.: Full-scale Experimental Testing of RC Beam-column Joints Strengthened using CFRP Ropes as External Reinforcement. In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 250 (2022), 113305. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  26. [17] Golias, E.; Zapris, A.G.; Kytinou, V.K. et al.: Effectiveness of the novel Rehabilitation Method of Seismically Damaged RC Joints using C-FRP ropes and Comparison with widely applied Method using C-FRP sheets – Experimental Investigation. In: Sustainability, Vol. 13 (2021), 6454. doi.org/10.3390/su13116454 . Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  27. [18] Karayannis, C.; Golias, E.; Kalogeropoulos, G.I.: Influence of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Ropes Applied as External Diagonal Reinforcement on the Shear Deformation of RC Joints. In: Fibers, Vol. 10 (2022), 28. doi.org/10.3390/fib10030028 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  28. [19] Karayannis, C.G.; Chalioris, C.E.; Sideris, K.K.: Effectiveness of RC beam – column connection repair using epoxy resin injections. In: Journal of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2 (1998), Iss. 2, pp. 217–240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  29. [20] Karayannis, C.G.; Sirkelis, G.M.: Strengthening and rehabilitation of RC beam – column joints using carbon-FRP jacketing and epoxy resin injection. In: Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 37 (2008), pp. 769-790. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  30. [21] Karayannis, C.G.; Izzuddin, B.A.; Elnashai, A.S.: Application of adaptive analysis to reinforced concrete frames. In: Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), Vol. 120 (1994), Iss. 10, pp. 2935-2957. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  31. [22] Karayannis, C.G.; Golias, E.: Full scale tests of RC joints with minor to moderate seismic damage repaired using C-FRP sheets. In: Earthquakes and Structures, Vol. 15 (2018), Iss. 6, pp. 617-627. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  32. [23] Golias, E.; Lindenthal, H.; Schlüter et al.: Ertüchtigung seismisch beschädigter Rahmenknoten aus Stahlbeton mittels FRP-Filamentbündelverbindungen. In: Bautechnik 97 (2020), Heft 4, S.268–278. doi.org/10.1002/bate.201900085. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  33. [24] Golias, E.; Zapris, A.G.; Kytinou, V.K. et al.: Application of X-shaped CFRP ropes for Structural Upgrading of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints under Cyclic Loading – Experimental Study. In: Fibers, Vol. 9 (2021), 42. doi.org/10.3390/fib9070042 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  34. [25] Tsonos, A.G.: A Model for the evaluation of the Beam-Column joint Ultimate Strength – a more simplified version. In: J. Earthquakes and Structures, Vol. 16 (2019), Iss. 2, pp. 141–148. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  35. [26] Karayannis, C.G.: Design and Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Structures for Seismic Actions. editions SOFIA, 703 pages, Thessaloniki, 2019 (in Greek). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  36. [27] Tsonos, A.G.: Model for the evaluation of the beam-column joint ultimate strength-Substitution of equation (x+ψ)5 +10 ψ – 10 x = l with a line equation. Presentation during the 3rd Meeting of CEN/TC250/SC08/, Working Group 5, “Concrete”, Paris, 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  37. [28] Scott, B. D.; Park, R.; Priestley, M.J.N.: Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. In: ACI J., Vol. 79 (1982), Iss. 1, pp. 13–27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-34
  38. [1] EERI: Learning from Earthquakes: April 3, 2024, M7.4 Earthquake, Hualien City, Taiwan, 2024, www.learningfromearthquakes.org/component/lfe_reports/?view=lfereports&id=351 [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  39. [2] Central Weather Bureau: Earthquake details: EE2024040307580972019 [Datensatz]. Taiwan Seismic Network, 2024, scweb.cwa.gov.tw/en-us/earthquake/details/EE2024040307580972019 [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  40. [3] NHRE: Datensammlung aus Projekten in “Earthquake Engineering and Structural Design”, Earthquake Damage Analysis Center (EDAC), Bauhaus-Universität Weimar. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  41. [4] Chai, J.-F.; Teng, T.-J.: Seismic Design Force for Buildings in Taiwan. National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taiwan. 15. WCEE, Lisbon, 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  42. [5] CPAMI: Seismic Design Specifications and Commentary for Buildings. 2022 Revision. Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, Taipei, Taiwan. (Auf Chinesisch). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  43. [6] NARlabs: The new version of the seismic design specifications and explanations for buildings is officially launche, 2022, www.narlabs.org.tw/tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0I148622737263495777&sid=0M319499545434882531 [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  44. [7] Yepes-Estrada, C.; Calderon, A.; Costa, C. et al.: Global Building Exposure Model for Earthquake Risk Assessment. In: Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 39 (2023), Iss. 4. doi.org/10.1177/87552930231194048. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  45. [8] Grünthal, G.; Musson, R.; Schwarz, J. et al.: European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (updated MSKscale). Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, Luxembourg, Vol. 15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  46. [9] Schwarz, J.; Abrahamczyk, L.; Hadidian, N. et al.: Report on Knowledge-Based Exposure Modelling Framework Depending on the Accuracy and Completeness of Available Data. TURNkey Project H2020-SC5–2018, Deliverable D4.1, 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  47. [10] National Statistics, R.O.C.: Population and Housing Census, Taiwan, 2020, eng.stat.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=2401&sms=10889 [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  48. [11] Chou, C.-C.; Wu, C.-L.; Chai, J.-F. et al.: Summary Report of Hualien Earthquake in Taiwan on April 3, 2024 (First Edition, v1.0). National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering NCREE, Taiwan. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  49. [12] United Daily News:Hualien Earthquake/Uranus Building repaired after earthquake damage 6 years ago. (Auf Chinesisch), 2024, udn.com/news/story/123995/7876764 [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  50. [13] Suzuki, T.; Elwood, K. J.; Puranam, A. Y. et al.: Seismic response of half-scale seven-storey RC systems with torsional irregularities: Blind prediction. NZSEE 2020 Annual Conference, New Zealand. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  51. [14] Abrahamczyk, L.; Haweyou, M.; Schwarz, J.: Vertrauenswürdigkeit nichtlinearer Analysen und Schadensprognosen: Stahlbetonrahmentragwerke mit Torsionsunregelmäßigkeiten. D-A-CH-Tagung 2021, Online. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  52. [15] USGS: M7.4 – 16 km South of Hualien City, Taiwan, 2024, earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000m9g4/shakemap/intensity [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  53. [16] Worden, C.B.; Thompson, E.M.; Hearne, M. et al.: ShakeMap Manual Online: Technical manual, user’s guide, and software guide (Techniques and Methods). U. S. Geological Survey, 2020, http://cbworden.github.io/shakemap/ [Letzter Zugriff 03.06.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  54. [17] Hasan, P.L.; Beinersdorf, S.; Schwarz, J.: Reliability of ShakeMaps for Rapid Response Decisions – As a Question of Time and Generation Procedure. D-A-CH-Tagung 23, Kiel, 2023. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-45
  55. [1] Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik: Technische Regel Instandhaltung von Betonbauwerken (TR Instandhaltung). Ausgabe Mai 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  56. [2] Instandsetzungs-Richtlinie RL SIB:2001–10, DAfStb-Richtlinie – Schutz und Instandsetzung von Betonbauteilen. Ausgabe Oktober 2001. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  57. [3] DIN EN 1992–1–1, Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken – Teil 1–1: Allgemeine Bemessungsregeln und Regeln für den Hochbau. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe Januar 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  58. [4] DIN 18551, Spritzbeton – Nationale Anwendungsregeln zur Reihe DIN EN 14487 und Regeln für die Bemessung von Spritzbetonkonstruktionen. Ausgabe August 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  59. [5] DIN EN 14487–1, Spritzbeton – Teil 1: Begriffe, Festlegungen und Konformität. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe März 2023. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  60. [6] DIN EN ISO 6892–1, Metallische Werkstoffe – Zugversuch – Teil 1: Prüfverfahren bei Raumtemperatur. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe Juni 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  61. [7] Schnell, J.; Loch, M.; Stauder, F. et al.: Bauen im Bestand – Bewertung der Anwendbarkeit aktueller Bewehrungs- und Konstruktionsregeln im Stahlbetonbau. Bauforschung für die Praxis, Band 108, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  62. [8] DIN 50125, Prüfung metallischer Werkstoffe – Zugproben. Ausgabe August 2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  63. [9] DIN EN 12390–3, Prüfung von Festbeton – Teil 3: Druckfestigkeit von Probekörpern. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe Oktober 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  64. [10] DIN EN 12504–1, Prüfung von Beton in Bauwerken – Teil 1: Bohrkernproben – Herstellung, Untersuchung und Prüfung der Druckfestigkeit. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe Februar 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  65. [11] DIN EN 13791, Bewertung der Druckfestigkeit von Beton in Bauwerken und in Bauwerksteilen. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe Februar 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  66. [12] DIN EN 1990, Eurocode: Grundlagen der Tragwerksplanung. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe Oktober 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  67. [13] Teil 1: Erläuterungen zu DIN EN 1992–1–1 und DIN EN 1992–1–1/NA. Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, DAfStb Heft 600, Beuth, Berlin, 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  68. [14] Bemessung nach DIN EN 1992 in den Grenzzuständen der Tragfähigkeit und der Gebrauchstauglichkeit. Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, DAfStb Heft 630, Beuth, Berlin, 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  69. [15] DIN EN 10080, Stahl für die Bewehrung von Beton – Schweißgeeigneter Betonstahl – Allgemeines. Deutsche Fassung Ausgabe August 2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  70. [16] DIN 488, Betonstahl; Sorten, Eigenschaften, Kennzeichen. Ausgabe September 1984. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  71. [17] DIN EN 1992–1–1/NA, Nationaler Anhang – National festgelegte Parameter – Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken – Teil 1–1: Allgemeine Bemessungsregeln und Regeln für den Hochbau. Ausgabe April 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  72. [18] Schubtragverhalten von Fertigplatten mit Ortbetonergänzung, Oberflächenrauheit und Haftverbund zur Oberflächenrauheit von Fertigplatten mit Ortbeton, Ergänzung, ortbetonergänzte Fertigteilbalken mit profilierter Anschlussfuge unter hoher Querkraftbeanspruchung. Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, DAfStb Heft 456, Beuth, Berlin, 1996. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-59
  73. [1] Konopka, D.; Gebhardt, C.; Kaliske, M.: Numerical modelling of wooden structures. In: Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol. 27S (2017), pp. 93–102. doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.09.008. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  74. [2] Niemz, P.; Sonderegger, W.: Holzphysik: Physik des Holzes und der Holzwerkstoffe. Hanser-Verlag, München, 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  75. [3] Reichel, S.: Modellierung und Simulation hygro-mechanisch beanspruchter Strukturen aus Holz im Kurz- und Langzeitbereich. Technische Universität Dresden, Dissertation, 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  76. [4] Stöcklein, J.; Kaliske, M.: Thermo-hygro-mechanically coupled modelling of wood including two-phase moisture diffusion for transient simulation of wooden structures at mechanical and climatic loads. In: Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 59 (2023), pp. 67–79. doi.org/10.1007/s00231-022-03178-2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  77. [5] Hassani, M. M.; Wittel, F. K.; Hering, S. et al.: Rheological model for wood. In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 283 (2013), pp. 1032–1060. doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.031. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  78. [6] Saft, S.; Kaliske, M.: A hybrid interface-element for the simulation of moisture-induced cracks in wood. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 102 (2013), pp. 32–50. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.02.010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  79. [7] Luimes, R. A.; Suiker, A. S. J.; Verhoosel, C. V. et al.: Fracture behaviour of historic and new oak wood. In: Wood Science and Technology, Vol. 52 (2018), pp. 1243–1269. doi.org/10.1007/s00226-018-1038-6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  80. [8] Gebhardt, C.; Kaliske, M.: An XFEM-approach to model brittle failure of wood. In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 212 (2020), 110236. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110236. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  81. [9] Lukacevic, M.; Füssl, J.; Lampert, R.: Failure mechanisms of clear wood identified at wood cell level by an approach based on the extended finite element method. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 144 (2015), pp. 158–175. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  82. [10] Qiu, L. P.; Zhu, E. C.; Van de Kuilen, J. W. G.: Modeling crack propagation in wood by extended finite element method. In: European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, Vol. 72 (2014), pp. 273–283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  83. [11] Pech, S.; Lukacevic, M.; Füssl, J.: A hybrid multi-phase field model to describe cohesive failure in orthotropic materials, assessed by modeling failure mechanisms in wood. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 271 (2022), 108591. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  84. [12] Bourdin, B.; Francfort, G. A.; Marigo, J.-J.: The Variational Approach to Fracture. In: Journal of Elasticity, Vol. 91 (2008), pp. 5–148. doi.org/10.1007/s10659-007-9107-3. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  85. [13] Supriatna, D.; Yin, B.; Konopka, D. et al.: An anisotropic phase-field approach accounting for mixed fracture modes in wood structures within the Representative Crack Element framework. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 269 (2022), 108514. doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108514. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  86. [14] Storm, J.; Supriatna, D.; Kaliske, M.: The concept of representative crack elements for phase-field fracture: Anisotropic elasticity and thermo-elasticity. In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 121 (2019), pp. 779–805. doi.org/10.1002/nme.6244. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  87. [15] Fleischmann M.: Numerische Berechnung von Holzkonstruktionen unter Verwendung eines realitätsnahen orthotropen elasto-plastischen Werkstoffmodells. Technische Universität Wien, Dissertation, 2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  88. [16] May, M.; Konopka, D.; Storm, J. et al.: An anisotropic eigenfracture approach accounting for mixed fracture modes in wooden structures by the Representative Crack Element framework. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics (2024), submitted. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  89. [17] Storm, J.; Qinami, A.; Kaliske, M.: The concept of representative crack elements applied to eigenfracture. In: Mechanics Research Communications, Vol. 116 (2021), 103747. doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2021.103747. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  90. [18] Smith, I.; Landis, E.; Gong, M.: Fracture and fatigue in wood. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  91. [19] Kamke, F.; Kutnar, A.: Influence of stress level on compression deformation of wood in 170°C transient steam conditions. In: Wood Material Science and Engineering, Vol. 6 (2011), pp. 105–111. doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2010.535907. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  92. [20] Kutnar, A.; Sandberg, D.; Haller, P.: Compressed and moulded wood from processing to products. In: Holzforschung, Vol. 69 (2015), pp. 885–897. doi.org/10.1515/hf-2014-0187. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  93. [21] Sandberg, D.; Haller, P.; Navi, P.: Thermo-hydro and thermo-hydro-mechanical wood processing: An opportunity for future environmentally friendly wood products. In: Wood Material Science and Engineering, Vol. 8 (2013), pp. 64–88. doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2012.751935. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  94. [22] Fleischhauer, R.; Hartig, J.; Haller, P. et al.: Moisture-dependent thermo-mechanical constitutive modeling of wood. In: Engineering Computations, Vol. 36 (2018), pp. 2–24. doi.org/10.1108/EC-09-2017-0368. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  95. [23] Odjene, M.; Khelifa, M.: Elasto-plastic constitutive law for wood behaviour under compressive loadings. In: Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 23 (2009), pp. 3359-3366. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  96. [24] Fleischhauer, R.; Kaliske, M.: Multi-physical modeling and numerical simulation of the thermo-hygro-mechanical treatment of wood. In: Computational Mechanics, Vol. 70 (2022), pp. 945-963. doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02191-w. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  97. [25] Odjene, M.; Khelifa, M.: Finite element modelling of wooden structures at large deformations and brittle failure prediction. In: Materials and Design, Vol. 30 (2009), pp. 4081-4087. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  98. [26] Miehe, C.; Apel, N.; Lambrecht, M.: Anisotropic additive plasticity in the logarithmic strain space: modular kinematic formulation and implementation based on incremental minimization principles for standard materials. In: Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 191 (2002), pp. 5383–5425. doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00438-3. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  99. [27] Gibson, L.J.; Ashby, M.F.: Wood. In: Cellular Solids – Structure and Properties, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001, pp. 387–428. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  100. [28] Simo, J.C.; Kennedy, J.G.; Govindjee, S.: Non-smooth multisurface plasticity and viscoplasticity. Loading/unloading conditions and numerical algorithms. In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 26 (1988), pp. 2161–2185. doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620261003. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  101. [29] Bieberle, A.; Engmann, C.; Hartig, J. et al.: Analysis of moulded wood tube structure using gamma-ray computed tomography [Data set], 2018. doi.org/10.14278/rodare.55 [Zugriff am: 23.01.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  102. [30] Hartig, J.U.; Bieberle, A.; Engmann, C. et al.: Voxel-based finite element modelling of wood elements based on spatial density and geometry data using computed tomography. In: Holzforschung, Vol. 75 (2021), pp. 742–753. doi.org/10.1515/hf-2020-0105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  103. [31] Noguchi, M.; Sugihara, H.: Studies on static withdrawal resistance of nail: Effect of driving method and time after driving. Kyoto University Wood Research Institute, Technical report, 1961. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  104. [32] Aytekin, A.: Determination of screw and nail withdrawal resistance of some important wood species. In: International Journal of Molecular Science, Vol. 9 (2008), pp. 626–637. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  105. [33] Takanashi, R.; Sawata, K.; Sasaki, Y. et al.: Determination of screw and nail withdrawal resistance of some important wood species. In: Journal of Wood Science, Vol. 63 (2017), pp. 192–198. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  106. [34] Soltis, L. A.: Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL, GTR–113, Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Technical report, 1999. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  107. [35] Blaß, H. J.; Uibel, T.: Spaltversagen von Holz in Verbindungen: ein Rechenmodell für die Rissbildung beim Eindrehen von Holzschrauben. KIT Scientific Publishing, 2014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  108. [36] Aicher, S.; Münzer, A.; Hezel, J. et al.: Head pull-through capacity of load-bearing timber screws – Influential parameters and shortcomings of European test procedure. In: Wood Material Science & Engineering, Vol. 18 (2023), pp. 1505–1520. doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2022.2155994. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  109. [37] Rahmi, D. P.; Fleischhauer, R.; Kaliske, M.: A displacement-driven approach to frictional contact mechanics. In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 124 (2023), pp. 1–33. doi.org/10.1002/nme.7353. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  110. [38] Jenkel, C.; Kaliske, M.: Analyse von Holzbauteilen unter Berücksichtigung struktureller Inhomogenitäten. In: Bauingenieur 88 (2013), S. 494–507. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  111. [39] Vořechovský, M.: Simulation of simply cross correlated random fields by series expansion methods. In: Structural Safety, Vol. 30 (2008), pp. 337–363. doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2007.05.002. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  112. [40] Schietzold, F. N.; Schmidt, A.; Dannert, M. M. et al.: Development of fuzzy probability based random fields for the numerical structural design. In: Surveys for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 42 (2019), e201900004. doi.org/10.1002/gamm.201900004. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  113. [41] Knigge, W.; Schulz, H.: Grundriss der Forstbenutzung. Paul Parey, Hamburg, 1966. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  114. [42] Fina, M.; Lauff, C.; Faes, M.G.R. et al.: Bounding imprecise failure probabilities in structural mechanics based on maximum standard deviation. In: Structural Safety, Vol. 101 (2023), 102293. doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102293. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  115. [43] Schmidt, A.; Lahmer, T.: Efficient domain decomposition based reliability analysis for polymorphic uncertain material parameters. In: Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Vol. 21 (2021), e202100014. doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202100014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-67
  116. [1] BMVBS: Richtlinie zur Nachrechnung von Straßenbrücken im Bestand (Nachrechnungsrichtlinie), Ausgabe Mai 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  117. [2] BMVI: 1. Ergänzung zur Richtlinie zur Nachrechnung von Straßenbrücken im Bestand (Nachrechnungsrichtlinie), Ausgabe April 2015. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  118. [3] CSA A23.3:19: Design of concrete structures, National Standard of Canada, Ausgabe Juni 2019. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  119. [4] DIN-Fachbericht 102: Betonbrücken, Ausgabe März 2009. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  120. [5] DIN EN 1992–2, Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken – Teil 2: Betonbrücken – Bemessungs- und Konstruktionsregeln; Deutsche Fassung, Ausgabe Dezember 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  121. [6] Bentz, E.C.; Vecchio, F.J.; Collins, M.P.: Simplified Modified Compression Field Theory for Calculating Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Elements. In: ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 103 (2006), Iss. 4, pp. 614–624. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  122. [7] Hegger, J.; Herbrand, M.; Adam, V. et al.: Beurteilung der Querkraft- und Torsionstragfähigkeit von Brücken im Bestand – erweiterte Bemessungsansätze. In: BASt-Bericht B 150, 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  123. [8] Zilch, K.; Zehetmaier, G.: Bemessung im konstruktiven Betonbau. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2010. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  124. [9] Albegmprli, H.M.; Gülsan, M.E.; Cevik, A.: Comprehensive experimental investigation on mechanical behavior for types of reinforced concrete Haunched beam. In: Advances in Concrete Construction, Vol. 7 (2019), Iss. 1, pp. 39–50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  125. [10] Empelmann, M.; Rathgen, J.: Querkrafttragfähigkeit von gevouteten Betonbauteilen, Kurzberichte aus der Forschung, Institut für Baustoffe, Massivbau und Brandschutz (2019). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  126. [11] DIN EN 1992–1–1, Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken – Teil 1–1: Allgemeine Bemessungsregeln und Regeln für den Hochbau; Deutsche Fassung, Ausgabe Januar 2011. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  127. [12] DIN EN 1992–1–1/NA, Nationaler Anhang – National festgelegte Parameter – Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken – Teil 1–1: Allgemeine Bemessungsregeln und Regeln für den Hochbau. Deutsche Fassung, Ausgabe April 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  128. [13] Reineck, K.-H.: Hintergründe zur Querkraftbemessung in DIN 1045–1 für Bauteile aus Konstruktionsbeton mit Querkraftbewehrung. In: Bauingenieur 76 (2001), Heft 4, S. 168–179. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  129. [14] DIN EN 1992–2/NA, Nationaler Anhang – National festgelegte Parameter – Eurocode 2: Bemessung und Konstruktion von Stahlbeton- und Spannbetontragwerken – Teil 2: Betonbrücken – Bemessungs- und Konstruktionsregeln. Deutsche Fassung, Ausgabe April 2013. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  130. [15] Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton: DAfStb-Heft 600 – Teil 1: Erläuterungen zu DIN EN 1992–1–1 und DIN EN 1992–1–1/NA, 2. überarbeitete Auflage, 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  131. [16] Vecchio, F.J.; Collins, M.P.: The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear. In: ACI Journal, Vol. 83 (1986), No. 2, pp. 219–231. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  132. [17] Herbrand, M.; Kueres, D.; Claßen, M. et al.: Einheitliches Querkraftmodell zur Bemessung von Stahl- und Spannbetonbrücken im Bestand. In: Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 111 (2016), Heft 2, S. 58–67. doi.org/10.1002/best.201500055. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  133. [18] Herbrand, M.: Strength Models for Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Members. Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  134. [19] Rombach, G.; Nghiep, V.H.: Versuche zur Querkrafttragfähigkeit von gevouteten Stahlbetonbalken ohne Querkraftbewehrung. In: Beton- und Stahlbetonbau 106 (2011), Heft 1, S. 11–20. doi.org/10.1002/best.201000062. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  135. [20] MacLeod, I.A.; Houmsi, A.: Shear Strength of Haunched Beams without Shear Reinforcement. In: ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 91 (1994), Iss. 1, pp. 79–89. doi.org/10.14359/4482. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  136. [21] Caldentey, A.P.; Padilla, P.; Muttoni, A. et al.: Effect of Load Distribution and Variable Depth on Shear Resistance of Slender Beams without Stirrups. In: ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 109 (2012), Iss. 5, pp. 595–604. doi.org/10.14359/51684037. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  137. [22] Debaiky, S.Y.; Elniema, E.I.: Behavior and Strength of Reinforced Concrete Haunched Beams in Shear. In: ACI Journal, Vol. 79 (1982), Iss. 2, pp. 184–194. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  138. [23] Tena-Colunga, A.; Archundia-Aranda, H.I.; González-Cuevas, Ó.M.: Behavior of reinforced concrete haunched beams subjected to static shear loading. In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 30 (2008), pp. 478–492. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  139. [24] Hou, C.; Nakamura, T.; Iwanaga, T. et al.: Shear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Tapered Beams without Stirrups. In: Journal of JSCE, Vol. 5 (2017), pp. 170–189. doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.5.1_170. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  140. [25] Stefanou, G.D.: Shear Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Non-Prismatic Sections. In: Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 18 (1983), Iss. 3, pp. 643–666. doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(83)90057-7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  141. [26] Hou, C.; Matsumoto, K.; Niwa, J.: Shear Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Haunched Beams without Shear Reinforcement. In: Materials Science, Vol. 35 (2013), Iss. 2, pp. 655–660. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  142. [27] Aziz, A.H.; Hassan, H.F.; Abdul Razzaq, F.M.: Experimental Study on Shear Behavior of Reinforced Self-Compacted Concrete Tapered Beams. In: Civil and Environmental Research, Vol. 8 (2016), Iss. 8, pp. 11–22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  143. [28] Al Jawahery, M.S.; Gülsan, M.E.; Albegmprli, H.M. et al.: Experimental investigation of rehabilitated RC haunched beams via CFRP with 3D-FE modelling analysis. In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 196 (2019), pp. 1–25. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109301. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  144. [29] Al-Attar, T.S.; Abdulqader, S.S.; Ibrahim, S.K.: Behavior of Tapered Self-Compacting Reinforced Concrete Beams Strengthened by CFRP. In: Engineering and Technology Journal, Vol. 35 (2017), Iss. 3, pp. 197–203. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  145. [30] El-Niema, E.I.: Investigation of Concrete Haunched T-Beams under Shear. In: Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 114 (1988), Iss. 4, pp. 917–930. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:4(917). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  146. [31] Hou, C.; Matsumoto, K.; Niwa, J.: Shear Failure Mechanism of Reinforced Concrete Haunched Beams. In: Journal of JSCE, Vol. 3 (2015), pp. 230–245. doi.org/10.2208/journalofjsce.3.1_230. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  147. [32] Jaafer, A.A.; Abdulghani, A.W.: Nonlinear finite element analysis for reinforced concrete haunched beams with opening. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 454, 2018, pp. 1–17. doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/454/1/012152. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  148. [33] Orr, J.J.; Ibell, T.J.; Darby, A.P. et al.: Shear behaviour of non-prismatic steel reinforced concrete beams. In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 71 (2014), pp. 48–59. doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.016. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  149. [34] Abd El-Rahman, M.; Rashwan, M.M.; Ahmed, M.A.: Static Behaviour of Reinforced High Strength Concrete Haunched Beams Strengthened by Using Epoxy Bonded External Steel Plates. In: Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 38 (2010), Iss. 6, pp. 1391–1428. doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2010.125567. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  150. [35] Zanuy, C.; Gallego, J.M.; Albajar, L.: Fatigue Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Haunched Beams without Stirrups. In: ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 112 (2015), Iss. 3, pp. 371–381. doi.org/10.14359/51687411. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  151. [36] Gülsan, M.E.; Al-Sammarraie, K.T.D.; Darraji, S.Y.H.: Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Haunched Beams. In: Materials Science, 2018, pp. 1–15. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  152. [37] Qissab, M.A.; Salman, M.M.: Shear Strength of Non-Prismatic Steel Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups. In: Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 67 (2018), Iss. 4, pp. 347–358. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  153. [38] Qissab, M.A.; Dhaiban, Z.M.: Shear Resistance of Nonprismatic High Strength Reinforced Concrete Beams. In: European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 135 (2015), Iss. 1, pp. 15–29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  154. [39] Reineck, K.-H.; Kuchma, D.A.; Fitik, B.: Erweiterte Datenbanken zur Überprüfung der Querkraftbemessung für Konstruktionsbetonbauteile mit und ohne Bügel. DAfStb Heft 597, Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 2012. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-80
  155. [1] ON: ONR 24810: Technischer Steinschlagschutz: Begriffe, Einwirkungen, Bemessung und konstruktive Durchbildung, Überwachung und Instandhaltung. 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  156. [2] Gaich, A.; Pötsch, M.: Automatic 3D Fragmentation Analysis from Drone Imagery. In: 48th Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting, Las Vegas, 2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  157. [3] De Biagi, V.; Napoli, M. L.; Barbero, M. et al.: Estimation of the return period of rockfall blocks according to their size. In: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 17 (2017), pp. 103–113. doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-103-2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  158. [4] Laimer, H. J.: Determination of rockfall design blocks in Upper Triassic limestones and dolomites (Dachstein Formation, Northern Caclererous Alps). In: Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Vol. 79 (2019). doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01640-w. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  159. [5] Mölk, M.; Rieder, B.: Rockfall hazard zones in Austria. Experience, problems and solutions in the development of a standardised procedure. In: Geomechanics and Tunnelling, Vol. 10 (2017), pp. 24–33. doi.org/10.1002/geot.201600065. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  160. [6] Rouiller, J.-D.; Marro, C.: Application de la méthodologie “Matterock” à l’évaluation du danger lié aux falaises, Eclogae Geologicae Helvatiae. In: Eclogae Geologicae Helvatiae, Vol. 90 (1997), pp. 393–399. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  161. [7] Preh, A.; Fleris, E.; Illeditsch, M.: Vom Bemessungsblock zur Gefahrenkarte: Stolpersteine bei der Bewertung der Steinschlaggefahr. In: Hofmann, R. (Hrsg.): Tiroler Geotechniktag 2019 Naturgefahren, Innsbruck, 2019, S. 85–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  162. [8] Preh, A.; Glade, T.; Kociu, A. et al.: NoeTALUS – Methods for producing rock fall hazard maps of different scales in Lower Austria. In: EGU General Assembly 2020, Wien, 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  163. [9] Preh, A.; Fleris, E.; Illeditsch M.: THROW, ein dynamisch stochastisches Simulationsmodell zur Prognose von Steinschlag. In: Poisel, R.; Preh, A.; Kolenprat, B. (Hrsg.): Gefahren durch Steinfall und Felssturz, St. Pölten, 2018, S. 25–38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  164. [10] Jaboyedoff, M.; Dudt, J. P.; Labiouse, V.: An attempt to refine rockfall hazard zoning based on the kinetic energy, frequency and fragmentation degree. In: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 5, 2005, pp. 621–632. doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-621-2005. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  165. [11] Illeditsch M.; Preh A.: The concept of design block size – A critical review of ONR 24810 “Technical Protection against Rockfall”. In: Geomechanics and Tunnelling, Vol. 13 (2020), pp. 604-611. doi.org/10.1002/geot.202000021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  166. [12] Illeditsch, M.; Preh, A.: Determination of meaningful block sizes for rockfall modelling. In: Natural Hazards, 2024. doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06432-4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  167. [13] Itasca: 3DEC 5.2: Distinct-Element modelling of Jointed and Blocky Material in 3D. Itasca Consulting Group, Minneapolis [code], 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  168. [14] Agisoft: Agisoft Metashape. (1.7.3) [code], 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  169. [15] CloudCompare: CloudCompare: 3D point cloud and mesh processing software. (2.12.alpha) [code], 2020. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  170. [16] Riquelme, A. J.; Abellán, A.; Tomás, R. et al.: A new approach for semi-automatic rock mass joints recognition from 3D point clouds. In: Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 68, 2014, pp. 38–52. doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2014.03.014. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  171. [17] Fuchs, W.; Grill, R.; Maturam, A.: Geol. Karte 1:50 000, 37 Mautern. GBA, 1983. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  172. [18] Landesregierung N.: NOE Atlas, atlas.noe.gv.at [Letzter Zugriff 13.03.2024]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  173. [19] Grohmann, C. H.; Companha, G. A. C.: OpenStereo. Free Software Foundation [code], 2017. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  174. [20] Rauscher, R.: Planung, Ausrichtung und Durchführung eines Steinschlag-Sturzversuches zur Kalibrierung von 3D-Steinschlagsimulationen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der ONR 24810:2017. Wien, Universität für Bodenkultur, 2018. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  175. [21] Goodman, R. E.; Shi, G.-H.: Block Theory and Its Application to Rock Engineering. New Jersey, United States, 1985. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90
  176. [22] Corominas, J.; Mavrouli, O.; Ruiz-Carulla, R.: Magnitude and frequency relations: are there geological constraints to the rockfall size? In: Landslides, Vol. 15, 2018, pp. 829–845. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2024-07-08-90

Latest issues

Bauingenieur
See all issues
Cover der Ausgabe: Bauingenieur Jahrgang 101 (2026), Heft 03
Ausgabe No access
Organ des VDI Fachbereichs Bautechnik
Jahrgang 101 (2026), Heft 03
Cover der Ausgabe: Bauingenieur Jahrgang 101 (2026), Heft 01-02
Ausgabe No access
Organ des VDI Fachbereichs Bautechnik
Jahrgang 101 (2026), Heft 01-02
Cover der Ausgabe: Bauingenieur Jahrgang 100 (2025), Heft 12
Ausgabe No access
Organ des VDI Fachbereichs Bautechnik
Jahrgang 100 (2025), Heft 12
Cover der Ausgabe: Bauingenieur Jahrgang 100 (2025), Heft 11
Ausgabe No access
Organ des VDI Fachbereichs Bautechnik
Jahrgang 100 (2025), Heft 11
Cover der Ausgabe: Bauingenieur Jahrgang 100 (2025), Heft 10
Ausgabe Partial access
Organ des VDI Fachbereichs Bautechnik
Jahrgang 100 (2025), Heft 10

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Give feedback

We welcome your feedback on content and features. Your message helps us to continuously improve our service.

Rating
Attach images
or drag and drop
PNG or JPG (max. 3 MB)

Login

Forgotten your password?
Login via your Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Don't have an account yet?
Register now

Cite publication

Download: RIS