Mahatma Gandhi’s Autobiographical Narration of the Law

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of book: Erzählen und Recht / Narrative and Law
Open Access Full access

Erzählen und Recht / Narrative and Law

Authors:
Series
Faktuales und fiktionales Erzählen
Volume
12
Publisher
Ergon, Baden-Baden
Copyright year
2022
ISBN-Print
978-3-95650-963-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-95650-964-3

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Mahatma Gandhi’s Autobiographical Narration of the Law

Authors:
ISBN-Print
978-3-95650-963-6
ISBN-Online
978-3-95650-964-3
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. Arnauld, Andreas von (2009) „Was war, was ist - und was sein soll. Erzählen im juristischen Diskurs.“ Wirklichkeitserzählungen: Felder, Formen und Funktionen nicht-literarischen Erzählens. Hg. Christian Klein und Matías Martínez. Stuttgart: Metzler. 14-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  2. Arnauld, Andreas von, und Stefan Martini (2015) „Unreliable Narration in Law Courts.“ in Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness: Intermedial and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Hg. Vera Nünning. Berlin: de Gruyter. 347-370. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  3. Arnauld, Andreas von (2017) Hg. Völkerrechtsgeschichte(n): Historische Narrative und Konzepte im Wandel. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  4. Blufarb, Ruth (2017) Geschichten im Recht: Übertragbarkeit von „Law as Narrative“ auf die deutsche Rechtsordnung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  5. Hipp, Dominique (2020) Von NS-Konzentrationslagern erzählen: Angeklagte vor Gericht über Dachau, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück und Neuengamme. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  6. Hyde, Alan (1997) Bodies of Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  7. Levinson, Sanford (1988) “Law as Literature.” Interpreting Law and Literature. A Hermeneutic Reader. Ed. Sanford Levinson and Steven Mailloux. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press. 155-173. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  8. Lüderssen, Klaus (2002) „Das Narrative in der Jurisprudenz.“ Produktive Spiegelungen: Recht in Literatur, Theater und Film [1991]. Hg. Klaus Lüderssen. Baden-Baden: Nomos: 66-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  9. Sarat, Austin, Matthew Anderson, and Cathrine O. Frank (2010) Ed. Law and the Humanities. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  10. Schramm, Edward (2007) “Law and Literature.” Juristische Ausbildung: 581-585. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  11. Stolleis, Michael (2008) Rechtsgeschichte schreiben: Rekonstruktion, Erzählung, Fiktion? Basel: Schwabe. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  12. Stolleis, Michael (2015) Margarethe und der Mönch: Rechtsgeschichte in Geschichten. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  13. Weisberg, Richard H. (1984) The Failure of the Word. The Protagonist as Lawyer in Modern Fiction. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  14. Weisberg, Richard H. (1992) Poethics and Other Strategies of Law and Literature. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-7
  15. Anker, Elizabeth S., and Bernadette Meyler (2017) Ed. New Directions in Law and Literature. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  16. Arnauld, Andreas von (2009) „Was war, was ist - und was sein soll. Erzählen im juristischen Diskurs.“ Wirklichkeitserzählungen: Felder, Formen und Funktionen nicht-literarischen Erzählens. Ed. Christian Klein and Matías Martínez. Stuttgart: Metzler. 14-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  17. Arnauld, Andreas von, und Stefan Martini (2015) “Unreliable Narration in Law Courts.” Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness: Intermedial and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Ed. Vera Nünning. Berlin: de Gruyter: Berlin. 347-370. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  18. Arnauld, Andreas von (2017) Ed. Völkerrechtsgeschichte(n): Historische Narrative und Konzepte im Wandel. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  19. Baron, Jane B. (1999) “Law, Literature and the Problem of Interdisciplinarity.” Yale Law Journal 108: 1059-1085. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  20. Binder, Guyora, and Robert Weisberg (2000) Literary Criticisms of Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  21. Blufarb, Ruth (2017) Geschichten im Recht: Übertragbarkeit von „Law as Narrative“ auf die deutsche Rechtsordnung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  22. Brooks, Peter (2005) “Narrative in and of the Law.” A Companion to Narrative Theory. Ed. James Phelan and Peter Rabinowitz. Oxford: Blackwell. 415-426. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  23. Brooks, Peter (2017) “Retrospective Prophecies: Legal Narrative Constructions.” New Directions in Law and Literature. Ed. Elizabeth S. Anker and Bernadette Meyler. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 92-108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  24. Brooks, Peter, and Paul Gewirtz (1996) Ed. Law’s Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  25. Bruner, Jerome (1990) Making Stories. Law, Literature, Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  26. Burns, Robert P. (2012) “Narrative and Drama in the American Trial.” Faculty Working Papers. Paper 201. Web. http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/facultyworkingpapers/201. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  27. Cover, Robert (1992) “Nomos and Narrative” [1983]. Narrative, Violence and the Law. Ed. Robert Cover et al. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Univ. Press. 95-172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  28. Dolin, Kieran (2007) A Critical Introduction to Law and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  29. Douthwaite, John, and Ulrike Tabbert (2022) Ed. The Linguistics of Crime: A Linguistic Contribution to the Study of Crime. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  30. Farmer, Lindsay (2010) “Trials.” Law and the Humanities. An Introduction. Ed. Sarat et al. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 455-477. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  31. Fludernik, Monika (2014) “A Narratology of the Law? Narratives in Legal Discourse.” CAL: Analysis of Law: An International & Interdisciplinary Law Review 1.1: 87-109. Web. <http://cal.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cal/article/view/21024/17173>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  32. Fludernik, Monika (2019) Metaphors of Confinement. The Prison in Fact, Fiction and Fantasy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  33. Hanne, Michael, and Robert Weisberg (2018) Ed. Narrative and Metaphor in the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  34. Heinzelman, Susan Sage (2010) “Imagining the Law: The Novel.” Law and the Humanities. An Introduction. Ed. Austin Sarat et al. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 213-240. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  35. Hipp, Dominique (2020) Von NS-Konzentrationslagern erzählen: Angeklagte vor Gericht über Dachau, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück und Neuengamme. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  36. Hjorth, Line N. (2021) “Underlying Narratives in Courtroom Exchanges.” Narratives in the Criminal Process. Ed. Frode Helmich Pedersen, Espen Ingebrigtsen and Werner Gephart. Frankfurt: Klostermann. 139-154. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  37. Hyde, Alan (1997) Bodies of Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  38. Kayman, Martin A. (2002) “Law-and-Literature: Questions of Jurisdiction.” REAL: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature 18: Law and Literature. Ed. Brook Thomas. Tübingen: Narr. 1-20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  39. Levinson, Sanford (1988) “Law as Literature.” Interpreting Law and Literature. A Hermeneutic Reader. Ed. Sanford Levinson and Steven Mailloux. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press. 155-173. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  40. Lüderssen, Klaus (2002) „Das Narrative in der Jurisprudenz.“ Produktive Spiegelungen: Recht in Literatur, Theater und Film [1991]. Ed. Klaus Lüderssen. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 66-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  41. Olson, Greta (2014) “Narration and Narrative in Legal Discourse.” The Living Handbook of Narratology. Web. https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/113.html. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  42. Olson, Greta (2018) “On Narrating and Troping the Law: The Conjoined Use of Narrative and Metaphor in Legal Discourse.” Narrative and Metaphor in the Law. Ed. Michael Hanne and Robert Weisberg. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 19-36. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  43. Peters, Julie Stone (2005) “Law, Literature, and the Vanishing Real: On the Future of an Interdisciplinary Illusion.” PMLA 120: 442-453. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  44. Posner, Richard A. (1998) Law and Literature [1988]. Revised and enlarged edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  45. Saint-Amour, Paul K. (2003) The Copywrights: Intellectual Property and the Literary Imagination. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  46. Sarat, Austin, Matthew Anderson, and Cathrine O. Frank (2010) “Introduction: On the Origins and Prospects of the Humanistic Study of Law.” Law and the Humanities. An Introduction. Ed. Austin Sarat et al. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 1-46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  47. Sarat, Austin, Matthew Anderson, and Cathrine O. Frank (2010) Ed. Law and the Humanities. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  48. Schramm, Edward (2007) “Law and Literature.” Juristische Ausbildung: 581-585. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  49. Spoo, Robert (2013) Without Copyrights: Piracy, Publishing, and the Public Domain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  50. Stern, Simon (2017) “Legal and Literary Fictions.” New Directions in Law and Literature. Ed. Elizabeth S. Anker and Bernadette Meyler. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 313-326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  51. Stern, Simon, Maksymilian Del Mar, and Bernadette Meyler (2020) Ed. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  52. Sternberg, Meir (2008) “If-Plots: Narrativity and the Law-Code.” Theorizing Narrativity. Ed. John Pier and José Àngel García Landa. Narratologia 12. Berlin: De Gruyter. 29-107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  53. Stolleis, Michael (2008) Rechtsgeschichte schreiben: Rekonstruktion, Erzählung, Fiktion? Basel: Schwabe. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  54. Stolleis, Michael (2015) Margarethe und der Mönch: Rechtsgeschichte in Geschichten. München: Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  55. Thomas, Brook (1987) Cross-Examinations of Law and Literature: Cooper, Hawthorne, Stowe, and Melville. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  56. Thomas, Brook (2017) “Minding Previous Steps Taken.” New Directions in Law and Literature. Ed. Elizabeth S. Anker and Bernadette Meyler. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 33-45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  57. Ward, Ian (1995) “Law and Literature: A Continuing Debate.” Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives. Ed. Ian Ward. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 3-27. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  58. Weisberg, Richard H. (1984) The Failure of the Word. The Protagonist as Lawyer in Modern Fiction. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  59. Weisberg, Richard H. (1992) Poethics and Other Strategies of Law and Literature. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  60. White, James Boyd (1973) The Legal Imagination. Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression. Boston: Little & Brown. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  61. Yovel, Jonathan, and Elizabeth Ellen Mertz (2005) “Courtroom Narration: A Capsule Essay.” Web. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46417903_Courtroom_Narration_A_Capsule_Essay>. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-15
  62. Arnauld, Andreas von (2009) „Was war, was ist - und was sein soll: Erzählen im juristischen Diskurs.“ Wirklichkeitserzählungen - Felder, Formen und Funktionen nicht-literarischen Erzählens. Hg. Christian Klein und Matías Martínez. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler. 14-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  63. Baron, Jane B. und Julia Epstein (1998) „Language and the Law: Literature, Narrative, and Legal Theory.“ The Politics of Law. A Progressive Critique. Hg. David Kairys. 3. Auflage. New York: Basic Books. 662-679. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  64. Begründung zum Ersten „Bevölkerungsschutzgesetz“, Bundestagsdrucksache 19/18111 v. 24. März 2020, 14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  65. Bernstorff, Christoph Graf von (2011) Einführung in das englische Recht. 4. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  66. Binder, Guyora (1999) „The Law-as-Literature Trope.“ Law and Literature. Hg. Michael Freeman und Andrew Lewis. Band 2. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 65-89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  67. Binder, Guyora und Robert Weisberg (2000) Literary Criticisms of Law. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  68. Burns, Robert P. (1999) A Theory of the Trial. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  69. Bleich, Susanne (1989) „Die literarische und die juristische Hermeneutik - Ein Vergleich.“ Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 42: 3197-3202. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  70. Blufarb, Ruth (2017) Geschichten im Recht - Übertragbarkeit von „Law as Narrative“ auf die deutsche Rechtsordnung. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  71. Breitenwischer, Dustin, Hanna-Myriam Häger und Julian Menninger (2020) „Zur Geschichte und Medialität faktualer und fiktionaler Erzählpraktiken: Eine Einleitung.“ Faktuales und Fiktionales Erzählen II. Hg. dies. Baden-Baden: Ergon. 7-29. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  72. Brooks, Peter (1996) „The Law as Narrative and Rhetoric.“ Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Hg. ders. und Paul Gewirtz. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. 14-22. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  73. Brooks, Peter (2002) „Narrativity of the Law.“ Cardozo School of Law: Law and Literature. Band 14. 1-10. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  74. Coughlin, Anne M. (1995) „Regulating the Self: Autobiographical Performances in Outsider Scholarship.“ Virginia Law Review 81: 1229-1340. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  75. Cover, Robert M. (1983) „The Supreme Court 1982 Term, Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.“ Harvard Law Review 97: 4-68. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  76. Delgado, Richard (1989) „Storytelling for Oppositionists and Others: A Plea for Narrative.“ Michigan Law Review 87.8: 2411-2441. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  77. Dershowitz, Alan M. (1996) „Life is not a Dramatic Narrative.“ Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Hg. Peter Brooks und Paul Gewirtz. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. 99-105. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  78. Dworkin, Ronald (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge/London: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  79. Esser, Josef (1970) Vorverständnis und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung. Frankfurt a.M.: Athenäums-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  80. Fludernik, Monika (1996) Towards a ‚Natural‘ Narratology. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  81. Frank, Jerome (1949) Courts on Trial, Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  82. Gewirtz, Paul (1996a) „Victims and Voyeurs: Two Narrative Problems at the Criminal Trial.“ Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Hg. Peter Brooks und ders. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. 135-161. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  83. Gewirtz, Paul (1996b) „Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law.“ Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Hg. Peter Brooks und ders. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. 2-13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  84. Goodwin, Jill Tomasson (1999) „The ‚Final Struggle‘: A Discoursal, Rhetorical, and Social Analysis of Two Closing Arguments.“ Law and Literature. Hg. Michael Freeman und Andrew Lewis. Band 2. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 301-322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  85. Grasnick, Walter (2010) „Die Erzählbarkeit des Rechts.“ Festschrift für Jan Schapp zum siebzigsten Geburtstag. Hg. Patrick Gödicke. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 195-212. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  86. Haft, Fritjof (2009) Juristische Rhetorik. 8. Auflage. Freiburg: Alber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  87. Hassemer, Winfried (2011) „Rechtssystem und Kodifikation: Die Bindung des Richters an das Gesetz.“ Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart. Hg. Arthur Kaufmann, Winfried Hassemer und Ulfrid Neumann. 8. Auflage. Heidelberg u.a.: Müller. 251-269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  88. Hay, Peter (2020) US-Amerikanisches Recht. 7. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  89. Henderson, Lynne N. (1987) „Legality and Empathy.“ Michigan Law Review 85.7: 1574-1653. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  90. Jackson, Bernard S. (1988) Law, Fact and Narrative Coherence. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  91. Kaufmann, Arthur (1982) „Analogie und Natur der Sache: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Typus.“ Heidelberger Forum 12. 2. Auflage. Heidelberg: Müller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  92. Kaufmann, Arthur (2011) „Problemgeschichte der Rechtsphilosophie.“ Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart. Hg. ders., Winfried Hassemer und Ulfrid Neumann. 8. Auflage. Heidelberg u.a.: Müller. 26-147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  93. Klein, Christian und Matías Martínez (2009) Wirklichkeitserzählungen - Felder, Formen und Funktionen nicht-literarischen Erzählens. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler. 1-13. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  94. Kötz, Hein (2003) „Rhetorik und Jurisprudenz im deutschen Recht und im Common Law.“ Festschrift für Peter Schlechtriem zum 70. Geburtstag. Hg. Ingeborg Schwenzer und Günter Hager. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. 79-90. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  95. Lachenmaier, Maria (2008) Die Law as Literature-Bewegung - Entstehung, Entwicklung und Nutzen. Berlin: wvb. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  96. Levinson, Sanford (1996) „The Rhetoric of the Judicial Opinion.“ Law's Stories: Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Hg. Peter Brooks und ders. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. 187-205. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  97. Lübbe-Wolff, Gertrude (2019), „Narrativkur für die EU? Forget it.“ Die Neuerfindung Europas. Hg. Claudio Franzius, Franz C. Mayer und Jürgen Neyer. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 195-206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  98. Lüderssen, Klaus (1996) Genesis und Geltung in der Jurisprudenz. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  99. Martinez, Aja Y. (2014) „A Plea for Critical Race Theory Counterstory: Stock Story versus Counterstory Dialogues Concerning Alejandra's ‚Fit‘ in the Academy.“ Composition Studies 42.2: 33-55. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  100. Maunz, Theodor und Günther Dürig (2016) Grundgesetz, Kommentar. 78. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  101. Müller-Dietz, Heinz (1990a) „Zur literarischen und juristischen Hermeneutik.“ Essais zur Theorie von Recht und Verfassung. Hg. Friedrich Müller und Ralph Christensen. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot. 157-171. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  102. Müller-Dietz, Heinz (1990b) Grenzüberschreitungen: Beiträge zur Beziehung zwischen Literatur und Recht. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  103. Nichterlein, Reiner (1982) „Recht und Sprache - Versuch zur Verbesserung der richterlichen Schriftsprache im Zivilprozeß.“ Deutsche Richterzeitung 7: 241-246. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  104. Nünning, Ansgar (2003) „Narratology or Narratologies? Taking Stock of Recent Developments, Critique and Modest Proposals for Future Usages of the Term.“ What is Narratology? Questions and Answers Regarding the Status of a Theory. Hg. Tom Kindt und Hans-Harald Müller. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 239-275. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  105. Paskey, Steven (2014) „The Law is Made of Stories: Erasing the False Dichotomy Between Stories and Legal Rules.“ Legal Communications & Rhetoric: JALWD 51: 51-82. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  106. Pieroth, Bodo (2015) Recht und Literatur. Von Friedrich Schiller bis Martin Walser. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  107. Posner, Richard A. (2009) Law and Literature. 3. Auflage. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  108. Reinhardt, Jörn (2019) „Wozu Narrativität? Interventionen der Erzählforschung in Recht und Politik.“ Die Neuerfindung Europas. Hg. Claudio Franzius, Franz C. Mayer und Jürgen Neyer. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 33-44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  109. Schäfer, Frank L. (2020) „Theater des Schreckens: Eine diachrone Narratologie des Strafprozesses.“ Faktuales und fiktionales Erzählen II. Hg. Dustin Breitenwischer, Hanna-Myriam Häger und Julian Menninger. Baden-Baden: Ergon.193-223. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  110. Schaeffer, Jean-Marie (2020) „Grenzsituationen des Erzählens.“ Faktuales und fiktionales Erzählen II. Hg. Dustin Breitenwischer, Hanna-Myriam Häger und Julian Menninger. Baden-Baden: Ergon. 263-282. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  111. Schapp, Wilhelm (2012) In Geschichten verstrickt: Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding. 5. Auflage. Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  112. Schellhammer, Kurt (2019) Die Arbeitsmethode des Zivilrichters für Rechtsreferendare und junge Praktiker mit Fällen und einer Musterakte. 18. Auflage. Heidelberg: Müller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  113. Scheppele, Kim Lane (1989) „Foreword: Telling Stories.“ Michigan Law Review 87.8: 2073-2098. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  114. Schmid, Wolf (2003) „Narrativity and Eventfulness.“ What is Narratology? Questions and Answers Regarding the Status of a Theory. Hg. Tom Kindt und Hans-Harald Müller. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 17-31. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  115. Seibert, Thomas-Michael (1989) „Schriftform und Mündlichkeitsprinzip im Rechtsdiskurs.“ Rechtsdiskurse. Untersuchungen zur Kommunikation im Gerichtsverfahren. Hg. Ludger Hoffmann. Tübingen: Narr. 217-250. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  116. Sternberg, Meir (2008) „If-Plots: Narrativity and the Law-Code.“ Theorizing Narrativity. Hg. John Pier. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 29-108. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  117. Turner, Mark (1996) The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  118. Wagner, Heinz (1965) „Interpretation in Literatur- und Rechtswissenschaft.“ Archiv für die civilistische Praxis 165: 520-557. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  119. Weisberg, Richard (1992) Poethics, and Other Strategies of Law and Literature. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  120. White, Hayden (1986) Auch Klio dichtet oder Die Fiktion des Faktischen, Studien zur Tropologie des historischen Diskurses. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  121. White, James Boyd (1973) The Legal Imagination. Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression. Boston: Little, Brown. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  122. Wülfing, Max (1995) „Richtermacht und Rechtsgestaltung.“ Verfassungsrichter: Rechtsfindung am U.S. Supreme Court und am Bundesverfassungsgericht. Hg. Bernhard Großfeld und Herbert Roth. Münster/Hamburg: Lit. 1-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  123. Youngs, Raymond (2007) English, French and German Comparative Law. 2. Auflage. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  124. Yovel, Jonathan (2004) „Running Backs, Wolves, and Other Fatalities: How Manipulations of Narrative Coherence in Legal Opinions Marginalize Violent Death.“ Cardozo School of Law: Law and Literature. Band 16.1. 127-159. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  125. Zöller, Richard (2002) Zivilprozessordnung, Kommentar. 23. Auflage. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-29
  126. Ballou, Ellen B. (1970) The Building of the House: Houghton Mifflin’s Formative Years. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  127. Barnes, James J. (1966) “Edward Lytton Bulwer and the Publishing Firm of Harper & Brothers.” American Literature 38.1: 35-48. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  128. Bracher, Peter S. (1976) “Harper & Brothers: Publishers of Dickens.” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 79.3: 315-335. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  129. Carey, Lea, & Blanchard, Letterbook, 17 June 1834 to 2 September 1835, Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  130. “Charles Scribner’s Sons Publish the Authorized Edition of Reminiscences. By Thomas Carlyle.” Publishers’ Weekly 19.13 (26 March 1881): 322. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  131. Chicago Tribune (31 October 1870): 3. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  132. Craig, Carys J. (2007) “Reconstructing the Author-Self: Some Feminist Lessons for Copyright Law.” American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law 15.2: 207-268. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  133. Denison, C.W. (1865) Illustrated Life, Campaigns and Public Services of Philip H. Sheridan. Philadelphia: T.B. Peterson & Brothers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  134. Dickens, Charles (1843) A Christmas Carol. London: Chapman and Hall. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  135. “Dickens’s Dealings with Americans.” American Literary Gazette and Publishers’ Circular 8.12 (15 April 1867): 348-349. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  136. Ellickson, Robert C. (1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  137. Everton, Michael J. (2011) The Grand Chorus of Complaint: Authors and the Business Ethics of American Publishing. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  138. “Great Reduction on Dickens’ Works.” American Literary Gazette and Publishers’ Circular 9.3 (1 June 1867): 86. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  139. Groves, Jeffrey D. (2007) “Courtesy of the Trade.” The Industrial Book, 1840-1880. Ed. Scott E. Casper. A History of the Book in America 3. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press. 139-147. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  140. Harper, J. Henry (1912) The House of Harper: A Century of Publishing in Franklin Square. New York: Harper & Brothers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  141. Hetcher, Steven (2013) “The Immorality of Strict Liability in Copyright.” Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 17.1: 1-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  142. Hix, Richard, interview, 30 September 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  143. Holt, Henry (1888) “The Recoil of Piracy.” Forum 5 (March 1888): 27-46. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  144. Holt, Henry (1908) “Competition.” Atlantic Monthly 102 (October 1908): 516-526. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  145. Johns, Adrian (2009) Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  146. Kellogg, D.O. (1897) “Copyright.” New American Supplement to the Latest Edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica. Ed. D.O. Kellogg. Vol. 2. New York: Werner. 913-915. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  147. Lea, Henry C. (1867) “American Editions of Dickens.” American Literary Gazette and Publishers’ Circular 9.2 (15 May 1867): 36-37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  148. Lessig, Lawrence (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  149. Lippard, George (1876) Washington and His Men. Philadelphia: T.B. Peterson & Brothers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  150. Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study.” American Sociological Review 28.1: 55-67. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  151. Macaulay, Stewart (2000) “Relational Contracts Floating on a Sea of Custom? Thoughts About the Ideas of Ian Macneil and Lisa Bernstein.” Northwestern University Law Review 94.3: 775-804. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  152. Macneil, Ian (1980) The New Social Contract: An Inquiry into Modern Contractual Relations. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  153. Madison, Charles A. (1966) Book Publishing in America. New York: McGraw-Hill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  154. McParland, Robert (2010) Charles Dickens’s American Audience. Lanham: Lexington Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  155. Minutes of the Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission on Copyright Together with an Appendix [1878]. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  156. “Note Respecting Harper & Brothers’ Edition of Reminiscences by Thomas Carlyle.” Publishers’ Weekly 19.12 (19 March 1881): 316. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  157. O’Sullivan, John (1843) “The International Copyright Question.” United States Magazine and Democratic Review 12.46 (February 1843): 113-122. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  158. Patten, Robert L. (1978) Charles Dickens and His Publishers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  159. Patterson, Lyman Ray (1968) Copyright in Historical Perspective. Nashville: Vanderbilt Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  160. Radin, Margaret Jane (2013) Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  161. Rose, Mark (1992) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  162. Rosenblatt, Elizabeth (2013) “Intellectual Property’s Negative Space: Beyond the Utilitarian.” Florida State University Law Review 40.3: 441-486. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  163. Seville, Catherine (2006) The Internationalisation of Copyright Law: Books, Buccaneers and the Black Flag in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  164. Sheehan, Donald (1952) This Was Publishing: A Chronicle of the Book Trade in the Gilded Age. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  165. Shi, Sampsung Xiaoxiang, and Brian Fitzgerald (2011) “A Relational Theory of Authorship.” Knowledge Policy for the 21st Century: A Legal Perspective. Ed. Mark Perry and Brian Fitzgerald. Toronto: Irwin Law. 291-312. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  166. Spoo, Robert (2013) Without Copyrights: Piracy, Publishing, and the Public Domain. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  167. Spoo, Robert (2017) “Courtesy Paratexts: Informal Publishing Norms and the Copyright Vacuum in Nineteenth-Century America.” Stanford Law Review 69.3: 637-710. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  168. Spoo, Robert (2020) “The Lawful Piracy of James Joyce’s Poems.” Forgotten Intellectual Property Lore: Creativity, Entrepreneurship and Intellectual Property. Ed. Shubha Ghosh. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 31-53. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  169. Stern, Simon (2017) “Legal and Literary Fictions.” New Directions in Law and Literature. Ed. Elizabeth Anker and Bernadette Meyler. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 313-326. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  170. Tebbel, John (1987) Between Covers: The Rise and Transformation of Book Publishing in America. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  171. The Tennessean (Nashville) (16 December 1871): 4. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  172. “The Dickens’ [sic] Controversy.” American Literary Gazette and Publishers’ Circular 9.3 (1 June 1867): 68-69. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  173. Ticknor & Fields (1867) “Important Announcement from Charles Dickens.” American Literary Gazette and Publishers’ Circular 9.3 (1 June 1867): 84-85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  174. Vaidhyanathan, Siva (2001) Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-55
  175. Auer, Marietta (2014) Der privatrechtliche Diskurs der Moderne. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  176. Brückner, Martin and Kristen Poole (2003) “The Plot Thickens: Surveying Manuals, Drama, and the Materiality of Narrative Form in Early Modern England.” ELH 69.3: 617-648. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  177. Chesnutt, Charles W. (1993) The House Behind the Cedars [1900]. New York: Penguin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  178. Clymer, Jeffory A. (2013) Family Money. Property, Race, and Literature in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  179. Cooper, James Fenimore (1823) The Pioneers or The Sources of the Susquehanna; A Descriptive Tale [1823]. New York: Wiley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  180. Faulkner, William (2003) The Portable Faulkner. Ed. Malcolm Cowley. New York: Penguin. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  181. Forst, Rainer (2018) Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  182. Harris, Cheryl (1993) “Whiteness as Property.” Harvard Law Review 106.8: 1707-1791. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  183. Hart Hemmings, Kaui (2009) The Descendants [2007]. London: Vintage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  184. Johnson v. M’Intosh. (1823) 21 U.S. (7 Wheaton) 543. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  185. Hattenhauer, Darryl (1993) “Racial and Textual Miscegenation in Chesnutt’s The House Behind the Cedars.” Mississippi Quarterly 47.1: 27-45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  186. Holloway, Karla FC (2014) Legal Fictions. Constituting Race, Composing Literature. Durham: Duke Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  187. Kayman, Martin (1996) “Lawful Writing: Common Law, Statute and the Properties of Literature.” New Literary History 27: 761-783. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  188. LaCroix, Sumner and James Roumasset (1990) “The Evolution of Private Property in Nineteenth-Century Hawaii.” Journal of Economic History 50.4: 829-850. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  189. Levy, Neil M. (1975) “Native Hawaiian Land Rights.” California Law Review 63.4: 848-885. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  190. Levy, Jonathan (2021) Ages of American Capitalism. A History of the United States. New York: Random House. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  191. Luck, Chad (2014) The Body of Property. Antebellum American Fiction and the Phenomenology of Possession. New York: Fordham. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  192. Meriwether, James B. and Michael Millgate (1980) Ed. Lion in the Garden. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  193. Milner, Neal (1993) “Ownership Rights and the Rites of Ownership.” Law & Social Inquiry 18.2: 227-253. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  194. Pipes, Richard (1999) Property and Freedom. London: Harvill. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  195. Rose, Carol (1994) Property and Persuasion. Boulder: Westview. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  196. Rose, Mark (1988) “The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship.” Representations 23: 51-85. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  197. Roth, Randall W. (2013) “Deconstructing The Descendants: How George Clooney Ennobled Old Hawaiian Trusts and Made the Rule Against Perpetuities Sexy.” Real Property, Trust and Estate Law Journal 48: 291-319. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  198. Schneck, Peter (2015) “Who Owns Uncle Tom’s Cabin? Literature as Cultural Property.” Copyrighting Creativity: Creative Values, Cultural Heritage Innstitutions and Systems of Intellectual Property. Ed. Helle Porsdam. London: Ashgate. 129-150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  199. Schneck, Peter (2018) “James Fenimore Cooper, The Pioneers, or, The Sources of the Susquehanna, a Descriptive Tale (1823).” Handbook of the American Novel of the Nineteenth Century. Ed. Christine Gerhardt. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. 174-196. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  200. Sollors, Werner (1986) Beyond Ethnicity. Consent and Descent in American Culture. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  201. Stolzenberg, Nomi Maya (2000) “The Culture of Property.” Daedalus 129.4: 169-192. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  202. Tokizane, Sanae (2007) “Cartographical Imagination: Faulkner’s Map of Yoknapatawpha.” The Faulkner Journal of Japan. np. https://www.faulknerjapan.com/journal/no9/2007Tokizane.html. last accessed November 09, 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-71
  203. Algarín, Miguel (1994) „The Sidewalk of High Art.“ Aloud: Voices from the Nuyorican Poets Café. Hg. ders. und Bob Holman. New York: Henry Holt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  204. „Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union in Support of Petitioner. (2014) The Supreme Court of the United States. Anthony Douglas Elonis v. United States“ - No. 13-983 -. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  205. Androutsopoulos, Jannis, Hg. (2003) HipHop: globale Kultur - lokale Praktiken. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  206. Beardsley, Monroe (1978) „Aesthetic Intentions and Fictive Illocutions.“ What is Literature? Hg. Paul Hernadi. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press. 161-177. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  207. Bleier, Evan (2014) „Rap Lyrics Used to Convict South Carolina Man of Murder at Olive Garden.“ United Press International. 20. Februar 2014. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  208. Bramwell, Richard (2015) UK Hip-Hop, Grime and the City. The Aesthetics and Ethics of London's Rap Scenes. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  209. „Brief of Amicus Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey in Support of Defendant-Respondent (2013) Criminal Action State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Vonte L. Skinner, Defendant-Respondent. The Supreme Court of New Jersey.“ A-57/58-12 (071764). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  210. Bülow, Karoline (2013) Persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzungen durch künstlerische Werke. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  211. Cohn, Dorrit (1990) „Signposts of Fictionality. A Narratological Perspective.“ Poetics 11.4: 775-804. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  212. Cohn, Dorrit (1999) The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  213. Cubrin, Charis (2014) „Rap on Trial.“ Race and Justice 4: 185-211. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  214. Currie, Gregory (1985) „What is Fiction?“ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43.4: 385-392. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  215. Daily Mail (2013) „Rapper Charged with Homicide after allegedly Bragging about unsolved Double Murder in his Song.“ 31. Juli 2013. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  216. Daily Press (2013) „Newport News Rapper Charged in Killings.“ 10. Oktober 2013. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  217. Dennis, Andrea (2007) „Poetic (In)Justice? Rap Music Lyrics as Art, Life, and Criminal Evidence.“ Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 31: 1-42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  218. Dietrich, Mark und Martin Seeliger (2013) „Rap als ambivalente Subjektskultur.“ Psychologie und Gesellschaft 37: 113-135. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  219. Eleveld, Mark (2003) (Hg.) Slam, Hip Hop & The Poetry of a New Generation. Chicago: Sourcebooks MediaFusion. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  220. Emson, Raymond (2017) Evidence. 5. Aufl. London: Macmillan Education UK. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  221. Fischer, Thomas (2020) Strafgesetzbuch und Nebengesetze. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  222. Gates, Henry Louis jr. (1988) The Signifying Monkey. A Theory of African-American Literary Criticism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  223. Gates, Henry Louis jr. (2011) „Foreword.“ The Anthology of Rap. Hg. Adam Bradley und Andrew DuBois. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. xxii-xxvii. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  224. Genette, Gerard (1993) Fiction and Diction. Übers. Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  225. Grove, Rashad (2021) „24 Rap Songs That Address Mental Health & Depression.“ Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.okayplayer.com/music/rap-songs-that-address-mental-health-depression.html. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  226. Gruber, Johannes (2017) Performative Lyrik und lyrische Performance: Profilbildung im deutschen Rap. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  227. Hamburger, Käte (1957) Die Logik der Dichtung. Stuttgart: Klett. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  228. Heitmeier, Kevin (2021) „Verfahren gegen Kollegah nach Zahlung von 100.000 € Schmerzensgeld erledigt.“ Lhr-Law Magazin. 07. Juni 2021. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.lhr-law.de/magazin/medienrecht-und-persoenlichkeitsrecht/verfahren-gegen-kollegah-nach-zahlung-von-schmerzensgeld-erledigt/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  229. Holland, Merlin (2004) (Hg.) The Real Trial of Oscar Wilde. New York: Harper Collins. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  230. Holman, Bob (1994) „Congratulations. You have found the Hidden Book. An Invocation.“ Aloud: Voices from the Nuyorican Poets Café. Hg. Miguel Algarín und ders. New York: Henry Holt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  231. Hyde, H. Montgomery (1987) (Hg.) The Trials of Oscar Wilde. Regina (Wilde) v. Queensberry. Regina v. Wilde and Taylor. Aldershot: Gregg Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  232. Idowa (2021) „Urteil: Rapper Fler bekommt Bewährungsstrafe.“ Idowa online. 03. März 2021. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.idowa.de/inhalt.urteil-rapper-fler-bekommt-bewaehrungsstrafe.34d49221-420a-4223-8ca4-d9285cac24cd.html. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  233. Jackson, Alan (2004) Prosecuting Gang Cases. What Local Prosecutors Need to Know. Alexandria: American Prosecutors Research Institute. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.nationalpublicsafetypartnership.org/clearinghouse/Resource/467. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  234. Justice (2021) Tackling Racial Injustice: Children and the Youth Justice System. A Report. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://justice.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/flipbook/46/book.html. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  235. Kablitz, Andreas (2008) „Literatur, Fiktion und Erzähler nebst einem Nachruf auf den Erzähler.“ Im Zeichen der Fiktion. Aspekte fiktionaler Rede aus historischer und systematischer Sicht. Festschrift für Klaus W. Hempfer zum 65. Geburtstag. Hg. Irina Rajewski und Ulrike Schneider. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. 13-44. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  236. Kayser, Wolfgang (1958) „Wer erzählt den Roman?“ Die Vortragsreise. Studien zur Literatur. Hg. Wolfgang Kayser. Bern: Francke. 82-101. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  237. Klein, Gabriele und Malte Friedrich (2003) (Hg.) Is this real? Die Kultur des HipHop. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  238. Kleiner, Marcus (2019) „Gericht zum Rapper-Streit Bushido/Fler: Kinder sind tabu. Marcus S. Kleiner im Gespräch mit Hannes Stepputat und Britta Schultejans.“ Auszüge aus: Die Welt Online. 11. Dezember 2019. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://medienkulturanalyse.de/wp/2019/12/11/die-welt-gericht-zum-rapper-streit-bushido-fler-kinder-sind-tabu/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  239. Kron, Thomas und Martin Horacek (2009) Individualisierung. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  240. Lind, Hans (2020a) „Theorizing fictional discourse: Toward a Reassessment of the Fact-Fiction Dichotomy in Legal Theory and Practice.“ Fictional Discourse and the Law. Hg. ders. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 1-64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  241. Lind, Hans (2020b) „Rap on Trial.“ Fictional Discourse and the Law. Hg. ders. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 124-137. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  242. Lind, Hans (2021) „Keeping it real: Zu den rechtlichen Problemen literarisch inszenierter Authentizität.“ Rap: Politisch. Rechts? Ästhetische Konservatismen im Deutschrap. Hg. Nicolai Busch und Heidi Süß. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa. 163-190. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  243. Lind, Hans (2022a) "‚Ich bin die Stimme von der Straße‘: Zum didaktischen Potential von Rap-Texten als Form der Gegenwartslyrik.“ Literatur im Unterricht. Texte der Gegenwartsliteratur für die Schule. Hg. Jan Standke. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag (im Erscheinen). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  244. Lind, Hans (2022b) "‚Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi?‘ Zu den Gesetzen der Fiktion in Literatur und Recht.“ Lizensur fiktionaler Literatur. Hg. Eric Achermann, Daniel Arjomand und Nursan Celik. Stuttgart: Metzler (im Erscheinen). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  245. Lind, Hans (2023) „Zensur und Fiktion [Arbeitstitel].“ Zensur. Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium. Hg. Nicola Roßbach. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Preprint über ssrn.com erhältlich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  246. Linden, Amy (1997) „Rap Screen Savers.“ Billboard. 22. November 1997. 46-50. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  247. Linder, Douglas (1995a) (Hg.) „Closing Speech for the Prosecution by Solicitor-General Frank Lockwood.“ The Criminal Trials of Oscar Wilde. Web. 09. November 2021. Http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/wilde/prosecclose.html. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  248. Linder, Douglas (1995b) (Hg.) „Testimony of Oscar Wilde.“ The Criminal Trials of Oscar Wilde. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  249. Lock, Joan (1980) Marlborough Street. The Story of a London Court. London: Robert Hale Ltd. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  250. LTO (2019) „Bei Kindern hört das Dissen auf.“ Legal Tribune Online. 11. Dezember 2019. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  251. Lyddane, Donald (2006) „Understanding Gangs and Gang Mentality: Acquiring Evidence of Gang Conspiracy.“ United States Attorney's Bulletin 54.3: 1-64. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  252. „MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICI CURIAE AND BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE MICHAEL RENDER („KILLER MIKE“), ERIK NIELSON, AND OTHER ARTISTS AND SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER No. 18-949 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States JAMAL KNOX, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent“ (2019). Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  253. Musikexpress (2016). November 2016. Web. 09. November 2021. https://www.musikexpress.de/wp-content/uploads/zeitung/musikexpress/ATvzN7mxpcBgb/index.html#/1. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  254. New York Times (2014) „Prosecutors Hear Evidence in Songs.“ 26. März 2014. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  255. Nielson, Erik (2020) „Prosecutors are increasingly - and misleadingly - using Rap Lyrics as Evidence in Court.“ The Conversation. 17. März 2020. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://theconversation.com/prosecutors-are-increasingly-and-misleadingly-using-rap-lyrics-as-evidence-in-court-131440. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  256. Nielson, Erik and Andrea Dennis (2019) Rap on Trial: Race, Lyrics, and Guilt in America. New York: The New Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  257. PBS Newshour (2014) 29. Juni 2014. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/rap-lyrics-used-evidence-court. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  258. Peters, Erskine (1990) Fundamentals of Essay Writing. Oakland: Regent Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  259. ProSieben (2018) „Gzuz: Emotionales Interview! 187-Rapper enthüllt private Details.“ 16. Mai 2018. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.prosieben.de/stars/video/gzuz-emotionales-interview-187-rapper-enthuellt-private-details-clip. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  260. Quinn, Eithne (2005) Nuthin' but a „G“ Thang: The Culture and Commerce of Gangsta Rap. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  261. Raue, Peter (2009) „Kunstfreiheit, Persönlichkeitsrecht und das Gebot der praktischen Konkordanz. Gedanken zum Esra-Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und dem Contergan-Fall.“ AfP 40.1: 1-6. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  262. Reckwitz, Andreas (2008) Subjekt. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  263. Reilly, Charlie (1994) (Hg.) Conversations with Amiri Baraka. Jackson: Mississippi Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  264. Rose, Tricia (2008) The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop - And Why It Matters. New York: Basic Civitas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  265. Rottmann, Kerstin (2013) „Aufruf zum Mord: Staatsanwalt prüft Hass-Song von Shindy & Bushido.“ Die Welt Online. 13. Juli 2013. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  266. RTC (2020) „16 Bars: Die Währung im Rap. https://rap-text.com/16-bars. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  267. Searle, John (1975) „The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse.“ New Literary History 6.2: 319-332. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  268. Seeliger, Martin (2019) „Autobiografien deutscher Gangstarapper im Vergleich.“ Verhandelte Globalisierung. Hg. ders. Cham: Springer. 129-152. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  269. Spiegel, der (2014) „‚Es geht um nichts. Um Scheiß.‘ Der Gangsta-Rapper Haftbefehl erzählt vom Leben in Deutschlands Problemvierteln.“ Der Spiegel 50: 130-133. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  270. Splash!Mag (2012). Web. 09. November 2021. Www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMIpwVW4FhM&list=HL1349963052&feature=mh_lolz. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  271. Stern, der (2013) „Bushido bestreitet Aufruf zur Gewalt.“ Stern Online. 15. Juli 2013. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  272. Sturm, Jan Felix (2018) „Gesetzeskraft und Bindungswirkung von Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts.“ JA 7: 682-694. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  273. Tagesspiegel (2008) „Anstiftung zum Mord.“ Tagesspiegel online. 11. Juni 2008. Web. 09. November 2021. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  274. Von Ammon, Frieder und Dirk von Petersdorff (2019) „Einleitung.“ Lyrik/Lyrics. Songtexte als Gegenstand der Literaturwissenschaft. Hg. dies. Göttingen: Wallstein. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  275. Wacker, Julian (2019) „Grime Poetry: Black British Rap Lyric(s) in the Twenty-First Century.“ Poem Unlimited: New Perspectives on Poetry and Genre. Hg. David Kerler und Timo Müller. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  276. Wilde, Oscar (1890) Dorian Gray. London: Ward, Lock and Co. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  277. Wolbring, Fabian (2015) Die Poetik des deutschsprachigen Rap. Göttingen: V&R unipress. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  278. Wolbring, Fabian (2018) "‚Ich bin mehr Gangster als mein Gangster-Image.‘ Zum Verhältnis von Gangsta-Rap und Kriminalität.“ BPB. 23. Februar 2018. Web. 09. November 2021. Https://www.bpb.de/apuz/265106/gangsta-rap-und-kriminalitaet. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  279. Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1981) „Response to Beardsley on ‚Fiction as Representation.‘" Synthese 46.3: 174-189. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-93
  280. Abbott, H. Porter (2021) The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  281. Alber, Jan (2017) “Narratology and Performativity. On Processes of Narrativization in Live Performances.” Narrative 25.3: 359-373. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  282. Aristotle (1999) Poetics [335 BC]. Ed. and Trans. Stephen Halliwell. Cambridge, London: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  283. Arnauld, Andreas von (2017) “Norms and Narrative.” German Law Journal 18.2: 309-329. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  284. Berns, Sandra (2018) To Speak as a Judge. Difference, Voice, and Power [1999]. Milton Park: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  285. Bourdieu, Pierre (1991) Language and Symbolic Power. Ed. John B. Thompson. Trans. Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. London: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  286. Brooks, Peter (2006) “Narrative Transactions - Does the Law Need a Narratology?” Yale Journal of Law & Humanities 18.1: 1-38. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  287. Caputo, John D. (2018) Hermeneutics, Facts, and Interpretation in the Age of Information. London: Pelican. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  288. Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1925) “Law and Literature.” Yale Review 14: 699-718. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  289. Chestek, Kenneth D. (2008) “The Plot Thickens: The Appellate Brief as Story.” Journal of the Legal Writing Institute 14: 127-169. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  290. Chestek, Kenneth D. (2015) “Of Reptiles and Velcro: The Brain’s Negativity Bias and Persuasion.” Nevada Law Journal 15: 605-631. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  291. Cover, Robert (1986) “Violence and the Word.” Yale Law Journal 95: 1601-1629. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  292. Criminal Code, Germany, DOI: https://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/ and DOI: https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  293. Criminal Code, the Netherlands, DOI: http://www.ejtn.eu/PageFiles/6533/2014%20seminars/Omsenie/WetboekvanStrafrecht_ENG_PV.pdf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  294. Douzinas, Costas, Ronnie Warrington and Shaun McVeigh (1991) Postmodern Jurisprudence. The Law of Text in the Texts of Law. London, New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  295. Elkins, James R. (1985) “On the Emergence of Narrative Jurisprudence. The Humanistic Perspective Finds a New Path.” Legal Studies Forum 9: 123-156. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  296. Elkins, James R. (2019) “Preface to ‘Narrative Jurisprudence. A Law, Lawyers, and Stories Bibliography’.” Legal Studies Forum 43.1-2: 3-7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  297. Engisch, Karl (1963) Logische Studien zur Gesetzesanwendung. 3rd expanded edition. Heidelberg: Winter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  298. Esser, Josef (1964) Grundsatz und Norm in der richterlichen Fortbildung des Privatrechts. 2nd edition. Tübingen: Mohr. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  299. Ferguson, Robert A. (1996) “Untold Stories in the Law.” Law’s Stories. Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Ed. Peter Brooks and Paul Gewirtz. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. 84-98. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  300. Gaakeer, Jeanne (2015) “Futures of Law and Literature: A Jurist’s Perspective.” Recht und Literatur im Zwischenraum. Aktuelle inter- und transdisziplinäre Zugänge/Law and Literature In-Between. Contemporary Inter- and Transdisciplinary Approaches. Ed. Christian Hiebaum, Susanne Knaller and Doris Pichler. Bielefeld: transcript. 71-103. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  301. Gaakeer, Jeanne (2019) Judging from Experience. Law, Praxis, Humanities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  302. Hart, August C. ‘t (1983) Strafrecht en Beleid. Essays. Leuven: Acco. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  303. Hassemer, Winfried (1968) Tatbestand und Typus. Untersuchungen zur strafrechtlichen Hermeneutik. Köln: Heymann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  304. Heilbron, Hilary (2019) Rose QC. The Remarkable Story of Rose Heilbron. Trailblazer and Legal Icon. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  305. Kafka, Franz (1971), “In the Penal Colony” [1919]. Franz Kafka, The Complete Stories. Ed. Nahum N. Glatzer. Trans. Willa and Edwin Muir. New York: Schocken Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  306. Kearns, Michael (1999) Rhetorical Narratology. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  307. Komter, Martha (2019) The Suspect’s Statement. Talk and Text in the Criminal Process. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  308. Malsch, Marijke, R. Kranendonk, J. de Keijser, H. Elffers, M. Komter and M. de Boer (2015) Kijken, luisteren, lezen. De invloed van beeld, geluid en schrift op het oordeel over verdachtenverhoren. Apeldoorn: Politie & Wetenschap, Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  309. Malsch, Marijke, J. van Zanten and H. Elffers (2018) “Pinokkio’s neus: leugens en het gedrag van de verdachte in een verhoorsituatie.” Delikt en Delinkwent 35: 1-16. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  310. Malsch, Marijke, and Meike M. de Boer (2019) “Interviews of Suspects of Crime: Law and Practice in European Countries.” The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process. Ed. Darryl K. Brown, Jenia I. Turner and Bettina Weißer. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. 317-340. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  311. Quintilian, Marcus Fabius (2001) The Orator’s Education. Books 1-12 [1521]. Ed. and Trans. Donald A. Russell. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  312. Rayar, Louise (1997) (Trans.) The Dutch Penal Code. Littleton: Rothman. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  313. Ricoeur, Paul (1984) Time and Narrative (vol. 1). Trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  314. Ricoeur, Paul (1986) “Life: A Story in Search of a Narrator.” Facts and Values. Philosophical Reflections from Western and Non-Western Perspectives. Ed. Marinus C. Doeser and J. N. Kraay. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 121-132. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  315. Ricoeur, Paul (2007) Reflections on the Just. Trans. David Pellauer. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  316. Schroth, Ulrich (1971) “Zum Problem der Wertneutralität richterlicher Tatbestandsfestlegung im Strafrecht.” Rechtstheorie. Ansätze zu einem kritischen Rechtsverständnis. Ed. Arthur Kaufmann. Karlsruhe: Müller. 103-110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  317. Sherwin, Richard K. (1994) “Law Frames: Historical Truth and Narrative Necessity in a Criminal Case.” Stanford Law Review 47.1: 39-83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  318. Sternberg, Meir (2008) “If-Plots: Narrativity and the Law-Code.” Theorizing Narrativity. Ed. John Pier and José Ángel García Landa. 29-107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  319. Stevens, Lonneke, Marjolein Cupido, Bas de Wilde, Elinor Fry and Sonja Meijer (2017) De tenlastelegging als grondslag voor de rechterlijke beslissing. Een rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek naar de inrichting van de tenlastelegging en de gebondenheid eraan bij het bewijs, de kwalificatie en de straftoemeting in Nederland, België, Frankrijk, Italië en Duitsland. Ed. WODC and Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie. Den Haag: Boom uitgevers. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  320. Vaihinger, Hans (1924) The Philosophy of ‘As If’. A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind [1911]. Trans. Charles K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  321. Verhoeven, Willem Jan, G. Vanderveen, L. van Dillen, S. Kruit and M. Hysaj (2020) “Verbeelding in de verhoorkamer. De invloed van het gebruik van beeldmateriaal in het verhoor op verhoortechnieken en proceshouding.” Politiewetenschap 117. Web. 10 September 2020 https://www.politieenwetenschap.nl/cache/files/61b9fa5087f49PW117.pdf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  322. Weisberg, Robert (1996) “Proclaiming Trials as Narratives: Premises and Pretenses.” Law’s Stories. Narrative and Rhetoric in the Law. Ed. Peter Brooks and Paul Gewirtz. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. 61-83. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  323. White, James Boyd (1984) When Words Lose Their Meaning. Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character, and Community. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  324. Zutter, André W.E.A. de, Robert Horselenberg and Peter J. van Koppen (2017) “Filing False Vice Reports: Distinguishing True from False Allegations of Rape.” The European Journal of Psychology Applied to a Legal Context 9.1: 1-14. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-129
  325. Brooks, Peter (1992) Reading for the Plot. Revised edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  326. Chatman, Seymour (1980) Story and Discourse. Ithaka, NY: Cornell Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  327. Dannenberg, Hilary P. (2005) “Plot.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. David Herman, Manfred Jahn and Marie-Laure Ryan. London/New York: Routledge. 435-439. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  328. Kjus, Audun (2010) Stories at Trial. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  329. Kolflaath, Eivind (2013) Bevisbedømmelse i praksis [The Evaluation of Evidence in Practice]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  330. Pedersen, Frode Helmich (2021) “The Court’s Story of Facts.” Narratives in the Criminal Process. Ed. Frode Helmich Pedersen, Espen Ingebrigtsen, Werner Gephard. Frankfurt a. M.: Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  331. Stierle, Karlheinz (1973) “Geschehen, Geschichte, Text der Geschichte.” Geschichte, Ereignis und Erzählung. Ed. Reinhart Koselleck and Wolf-Dieter Stempel. München: Fink. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  332. White, Hayden (2014) Metahistory [1973]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-151
  333. Agamben, Giorgio (2003) Was von Auschwitz bleibt: Das Archiv und der Zeuge. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  334. Barton, Stephan (2017) „Über-Zeugen im Strafverfahren.“ Über Zeugen: Szenarien von Zeugenschaft und ihre Akteure (Trajekte). Hg. Matthias Däumer, Aurélia Kalisky und Heike Schlie. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. 93-110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  335. Haas, Norbert (1975 (Hg.) Jacques Lacan. Schriften II. Olten/Freiburg: Walter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  336. Hannken-Illjes, Kati (2019) "‚Siehe da, es gab Ermessensspielräume‘: Argumentatives Erzählen - erzählendes Argumentieren.“ LiLi 49.1: 29-49. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  337. Henne, Thomas (2007) „Zeugenschaft vor Gericht.“ Zeugenschaft des Holocausts. Zwischen Trauma, Tradierung und Ermittlung. Hg. Michael Elm, Gottfried Kößler. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus. 79-91. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  338. Hipp, Dominique (2020) Von NS-Konzentrationslagern erzählen: Angeklagte vor Gericht über Dachau, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück und Neuengamme. Bielefeld: transcript. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  339. Jureit, Ulrike und Christian Schneider (2010) Gefühlte Opfer: Illusionen der Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  340. Krämer, Sybille (2008) Medium, Bote, Übertragung: Kleine Metaphysik der Medialität. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  341. Krämer, Sybille (2011) „Vertrauen schenken: Über Ambivalenzen der Zeugenschaft.“ Politik der Zeugenschaft. Zur Kritik einer Wissenspraxis. Hg. Sibylle Schmidt, Sybille Krämer und Ramon Voges. Bielefeld: transcript. 117-139. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  342. Krämer, Sybille (2017) „Spur, Zeuge, Wahrheit: Zeugenschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen diskursiver und existentialer Wahrheit?“ Über Zeugen: Szenarien von Zeugenschaft und ihre Akteure (Trajekte). Hg. Matthias Däumer, Aurélia Kalisky und Heike Schlie. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. 147-165. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  343. Krämer, Sybille, Sibylle Schmidt und Johannes-Georg Schülein (2017) „Zeugenschaft als philosophisches Problem: Zur Einleitung in den Band.“ Philosophie der Zeugenschaft: Eine Anthologie. Hg. dies. Münster: mentis. 7-23. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  344. Kranebitter, Andreas (2014) Zahlen als Zeugen. Soziologische Analysen zur Häftlingsgesellschaft des KZ Mauthausen. Mauthausen-Studien, Bd. 9. Wien: New Academic Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  345. Rosenthal, Maryla (1964) Deskription ihrer Zeugenaussage, DOI: https://www.auschwitz-prozess.de/zeugenaussagen/Rosenthal-Maryla/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  346. Schilling, Erik (2020) Authentizität: Karriere einer Sehnsucht. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  347. Schmidt, Sibylle (2009) Zeugenschaft. Ethische und politische Dimensionen. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  348. Schmidt, Sibylle (2011) „Wissensquelle oder ethisch-politische Figur? Zur Synthese zweier Forschungsdiskurse über Zeugenschaft.“ Politik der Zeugenschaft. Zur Kritik einer Wissenspraxis. Hg. dies., Sybille Krämer und Ramon Voges. Bielefeld: transcript. 47-66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  349. Schmidt, Sibylle (2016a) „Spuren der Authentizität: Zur körperlichen Dimension von Zeugenschaft.“ Der Spur auf der Spur. Hg. Sandi Attia, Ingrid Streble, Nathalie Le Boudece und Alice Volkwein. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter. 119-127. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  350. Schmidt, Sibylle (2016b) „Können Täter Zeugnis ablegen?“ Zeugen in der Kunst. Hg. Sybille Krämer und dies. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. 195-209. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  351. Scholz, Oliver R. (2011) „Das Zeugnis anderer - sozialer Akt und Erkenntnisquelle.“ Politik der Zeugenschaft. Zur Kritik einer Wissenspraxis. Hg. Sibylle Schmidt, Sybille Krämer und Ramon Voges. Bielefeld: transcript. 24-45. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  352. Stengel, Katharina (2019) „Opferzeugen in NS-Prozessen: Juristische Zeugenschaft zwischen Beweis, Quelle, Trauma und Aporie.“ Jahrbuch des Dubnow-Instituts XVIII: 577-610. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  353. Steyerl, Hito (2015) Die Farbe der Wahrheit: Dokumentarismen im Kunstfeld. Wien/Berlin: Turia + Kant. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  354. Weigel, Sigrid (2000) „Zeugnis und Zeugenschaft, Klage und Anklage: Die Geste des Bezeugens in der Differenz von ‚identity politics‘, juristischem und historiographischem Diskurs.“ Zeugnis und Zeugenschaft. Hg. Rüdiger Zill. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 111-135. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  355. Weitin, Thomas (2016) „Den Auftritt des Zeugen beobachten.“ Zeugen in der Kunst. Hg. Sybille Krämer und Sibylle Schmidt. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. 47-59. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  356. Wojak, Irmtrud (2009) Fritz Bauer 1903-1968: Eine Biographie. 2. Auflage. München: C.H. Beck. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-163
  357. Adorno, Theodor W. (2008) Theodor W. Adorno - Siegfried Kracauer. Briefwechsel 1923-1966. Ed. Wolfgang Schopf. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  358. Benjamin, Walter (2015) “Small History of Photography” [1931]. On Photography. Walter Benjamin. Ed. and trans. Esther Leslie. London: Reaktion Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  359. Benjamin, Walter (2002) “On the Theory of Knowledge, Theory of Progress.” The Arcades Project. Ed. and trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge/London: Harvard Univ. Press. 456-488. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  360. Bratu Hansen, Miriam (2012). Cinema and Experience. Siegfried Kracauer, Walter Benjamin and Theodor Adorno. Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. California Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  361. Dragvoll, Johan et al. (2014). The Rhetoric of Miscarriages of Justice (in Norwegian). Oslo: Vidarforlaget. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  362. Elvestad, Sven (1921) Døden tar inn på hotellet. Christiania: Helge Erichsen & co. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  363. Helmich Pedersen, Frode et al. (Ed.) (2021) Narratives in the Criminal Process. Series of the Käte Hamburger Center for Advanced Study in the Humanities, Law as Culture, vol. 26. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  364. Koch, Gertrude (1996) Siegfried Kracauer zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius Verlag. English edition: (2000) Siegfried Kracauer. An Introduction. Trans. Jeremy Gaines. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  365. Kracauer, Siegfried (1921/22) “Georg von Lukács’ Romantheorie.” Neue Blätter für Kunst und Literatur, 4.1: 1-5. in Siegfried Kracauer Schriften 5.1. Aufsätze (1915-1926), Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. 117-123. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  366. Kracauer, Siegfried (1947) From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of the German Film. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  367. Kracauer, Siegfried (1960) A Theory of Film. The Redemption of Physical Reality. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  368. Kracauer, Siegfried (1979) Der Detektiv-Roman. Ein philosophischer Traktat [1971]. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  369. Kracauer, Siegfried (1995a) “The Hotel Lobby” [1928]. The Mass Ornament. Weimar Essays. Ed. and trans. Thomas Y. Levin. Cambrigde/London: Harvard Univ. Press. 173-189. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  370. Kracauer, Siegfried (1995b) “Calico World” [1928]. The Mass Ornament. Weimar Essays. Ed. and trans. Thomas Y. Levin. Cambrigde/London: Harvard Univ. Press. 281-290. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  371. Kracauer, Siegfried (2007). The Detective Novel. A Philosophical Treatise. Cambridge: Polity Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  372. Kracauer, Siegfried (2014a) “Die Photographie” [1927]. The Past’s Threshold. Essays on Photography, Ed. Philippe Despoix and Maria Zinfert, trans. Conor Joyce. Zürich: diaphanes. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  373. Kracauer, Siegfried (2014b) History. The Last Things Before the Last [1969]. Completed by Paul Oskar Kristeller. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  374. Kracauer, Siegfried (2014c) Das Ornament der Masse. Essays [1963]. Mit einem Nachwort von Karsten Witte. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  375. Kracauer, Siegfried (2016) Die Angestellten. Aus dem neuesten Deutschland [1930]. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  376. Leslie, Esther (Ed.) (2015) On Photography. Walter Benjamin. London: Reaktion Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  377. Levin, Thomas Y. (1995) “Introduction.” The Mass Ornament. Weimar Essays. Ed. and trans. Thomas Y. Levin. Cambrigde/London: Harvard Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  378. Linneberg, Arild (2021) “Stories, Law, and Justice - on the Place of Narratives in the Field of Law and Humanities.” Narratives in the Criminal Process. Ed. Frode Helmich Pedersen et. al. Frankfurt a. M.: Vittorio Klostermann. 253-275. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  379. Linneberg, Arild (2022) “The Last-Minute Sprint of the Transcendental Subject: Siegfried Kracauer, Sven Elvestad and the Detective Novel.” Studies in Crime Writing, Newberry College: South Carolina, forthcoming 2022. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  380. Lukács, Georg (1965) Die Theorie des Romans. Ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der großen Epik [1920]. München: Luchterhand. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  381. Später, Jörg (2016) Siegfried Kracauer. Eine Biographie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  382. Sterne, Laurence (1940) The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman [1759-1767]. New York: Odyssey Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-181
  383. Amira, Karl von (1897) Grundriss des Germanischen Rechts. 2., verb. Aufl. Sonderabdruck aus der zweiten Auflage von Pauls Grundriss der germanischen Philologie. Strassburg: Truebner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  384. Asmuth, Bernhard (2007) „Charakter.“ Reallexikon der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft. Bd. 1: A-G. Hg. Harald Fricke und Klaus Weimar. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. 297-299. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  385. Blanckenburg, Friedrich von (1775) „Rezension zu J.W. Goethe Die Leiden des jungen Werthers.“ Neue Bibliothek der schönen Wissenschaften und der freyen Künste. Bd. 18. Leipzig. 46-95. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  386. Blanckenburg, Friedrich von (1965) Versuch über den Roman [1774]. Mit einem Nachwort v. Eberhart Lämmert. Stuttgart: Metzler. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  387. Bodmer, Johann Jakob, und Johann Jakob Breitinger (1891) Die Discourse der Mahlern [1721-1722]. 1. Theil. Hg. Theodor Vetter. Frauenfeld: Huber. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  388. Fohrmann, Jürgen (1989) Das Projekt der deutschen Literaturgeschichte. Entstehung und Scheitern einer nationalen Poesiegeschichtsschreibung zwischen Humanismus und Deutschem Kaiserreich. Stuttgart: Metzler. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  389. Eichhorn, Carl Friedrich (1808) Deutsche Staats- und Rechtsgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  390. Gerber, Carl Friedrich (1850) System des Deutschen Privatrechts. 2. verb. Aufl. Jena: Mauke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  391. Gervinus, Georg Gottfried (1980) „Geschichte der poetischen Nationalliteratur der Deutschen. Einleitung“ [1835]. Eine Wissenschaft etabliert sich: 1810-1870. Hg. Johannes Janota. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 172-188. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  392. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang (1774) Die Leiden des jungen Werthers. Leipzig [München [u.a.]]: [Saur]. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  393. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang (1795/1796) Wilhelm Meisters Lehrjahre. Ein Roman. Berlin: Unger. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  394. Goßens, Peter (2011) Weltliteratur. Modelle transnationaler Literaturwahrnehmung im 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart/Weimar: Metzler. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  395. Grimm, Jacob (2005) Vorlesung über deutsche Literaturgeschichte („die Geschichte der deutschen Literatur von der ältesten bis zur neuesten Zeit“, nach studentischen Mitschriften). Werke und Briefwechsel, Teil: Materialien, Bd. 1. Hg. Matthias Janssen. Kassel/Berlin: Verlag der Brüder-Grimm-Gesellschaft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  396. Hall, Joseph (1608) Characters of Vertues and Vices. London: Printed by Melch. Bradwood for Eleazar Edgar and Samuel Macham. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  397. Harth, Dietrich (1996) „Geschichtsschreibung.“ Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik. Bd. 3: Eup-Hör. Hg. Gert Ueding. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 832-870. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  398. Hugo, Gustav (1790) Lehrbuch der Rechtsgeschichte bis auf unsre Zeiten. Berlin: Mylius. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  399. Hugo, Gustav (1799) Lehrbuch der Geschichte des Römischen Rechts. Berlin: Mylius. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  400. Koberstein, August (1827) Grundriß der Geschichte der deutschen National-Literatur. Leipzig: Vogel. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  401. Kondylis, Panajotis (2002) Die Aufklärung im Rahmen des neuzeitlichen Rationalismus. Hamburg: Meiner. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  402. Koselleck, Reinhart (1985) Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  403. La Bruyère, Jean de (1692) Caractères De Théophraste Traduits Du Grec […] [1688]. Bruxelles: Leonard. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  404. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim (1973) „Hamburgische Dramaturgie.“ Werke. Bd. 4: Dramaturgische Schriften. Hg. Herbert G. Göpfert. Darmstadt: WBG. 229-720. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  405. Lieb, Claudia, und Christoph Strosetzki (2013) (Hg.) Philologie als Literatur- und Rechtswissenschaft. Germanistik und Romanistik 1730-1870. Heidelberg: Winter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  406. Lieb, Claudia (2021) Germanistiken. Zur Praxis von Literatur- und Rechtswissenschaft 1630-1900. Berlin/Heidelberg: Metzler. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  407. Meißner, August Gottlieb (1781-1788) Alcibiades. Leipzig: Breitkopf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  408. Meißner, August Gottlieb (1792) Spartakus. Berlin: Maurer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  409. Meißner, August Gottlieb (1798) Epaminondas. Prag: Barth. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  410. Meißner, August Gottlieb (1799) Julius Caesar. Berlin: Frölich. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  411. Moritz, Karl Philipp (1785-1790) Anton Reiser. Ein psychologischer Roman. Berlin: Maurer. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  412. Möser, Justus (1842) Patriotische Phantasien. Hg. J. W. J. von Voigt. Berlin: Verlag der Nicolaischen Buchhandlung. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  413. Rosenkranz, Karl (1830) Geschichte der deutschen Poesie im Mittelalter. Halle: Anton und Gelbcke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  414. Savigny, Friedrich Carl von (1840) System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Bd. 1. Berlin: Veit. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  415. Steinecke, Hartmut (1976) Romantheorie und Romankritik in Deutschland. Die Entwicklung des Gattungsverständnisses von der Scott-Rezeption bis zum programmatischen Realismus. Bd. 2. Stuttgart: Metzler. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  416. Stolleis, Michael (2008) Rechtsgeschichte schreiben. Rekonstruktion, Erzählung, Fiktion? Basel: Schwabe. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  417. Wagner-Egelhaaf, Martina (2013) „Einleitung: Was ist Auto(r)fiktion?“ Auto(r)fiktion. Literarische Verfahren der Selbstkonstruktion. Hg. dies. Bielefeld: Aisthesis-Verlag. 7-21. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  418. Weimar, Klaus (2003) Geschichte der deutschen Literaturwissenschaft bis zum Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts. Paderborn: Fink. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  419. Wezel, Johann Carl (1780) Herrmann und Ulrike. Ein komischer Roman. Frankfurt a. M./Leipzig: o.V. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  420. Wieland, Christoph Martin (1986) Geschichte des Agathon [1766/67]. Hg. Klaus Manger. Frankfurt a. M.: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  421. Wilda, Wilhelm Eduard (1842) Geschichte des deutschen Strafrechts. Bd. 1: Das Strafrecht der Germanen. Halle: Schwetschke. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  422. Wolf, Friedrich August (1986) Darstellung der Altertumswissenschaft nach Begriff, Umfang, Zweck und Wert [1807]. Weinheim: Acta Humanoira. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-193
  423. Alford, C. Fred (2000) “What Would It Matter if Everything Foucault Said about Prison Were Wrong? Discipline and Punish after Twenty Years.” Theory and Society 29.1: 125-146. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  424. Arneil, Barbara (2020) “Origins: Colonies and Statistics.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 53.4: 735-754. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  425. Arneil, Barbara (2021) “Jeremy Bentham: Pauperism, Colonialism, and Imperialism.” American Political Science Review 115.4: 1-12. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  426. Atwood, Margaret (2011) In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination. London: Virago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  427. Atwood, Margaret (2015) The Heart Goes Last. New York: Anchor Books. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  428. Bender, John (1987) Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century England. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  429. Bentham, Jeremy (1843a) “Political Remedies for the Evil of Offences.” Principles of Penal Law: The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Vol. I, 367-387. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  430. Bentham, Jeremy (1843b) “Rationale of Punishment.” Principles of Penal Law: The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Vol. I, 388-532. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  431. Bentham, Jeremy (1843c) “Of Indirect Means of Preventing Crimes.” Principles of Penal Law: The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Vol. I, 533-580. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  432. Bentham, Jeremy (1843d) “Panopticon; or, the Inspection-House.” The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Vol. IV, 36-66. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  433. Bentham, Jeremy (1843e) “Postscript I.” The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Vol. IV, 67-121. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  434. Bentham, Jeremy (1843f) “Postscript II.” The Works of Jeremy Bentham. Ed. John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait. Vol. IV, 121-172. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  435. Bentham, Jeremy (1996) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Ed. J.H. Burns, H.L.A. Hart and F. Rosen (Collected Works). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  436. Bentham, Jeremy (2002) Bentham’s Auto-Icon and Related Writings. Ed. James E. Crimmins. Bristol: Thoemmes Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  437. Bentham, Jeremy (2010) “Pauper Management Improved.” Writings on the Poor Law, vol. 2. Ed. Michael Quinn (Collected Works). Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  438. Bentham, Jeremy (2022) Panopticon Versus New South Wales and Other Writings on Australia. Ed. Tim Causer and Philip Schofield (Collected Works). London: UCL Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  439. Bode, Christoph (2019) “Totalitarianism by Consent: Orwell, Huxley, and Capitalism in the Stage of Corporate Surveillance.” Narrating Surveillance: Überwachen erzählen. Ed. Betiel Wasihun. Baden-Baden: Ergon. 21-42. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  440. Brooks, Peter (1984) Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York: A.A. Kropf. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  441. Brückner, Martin, and Kristen Poole (2002) “The Plot Thickens: Surveying Manuals, Drama, and the Materiality of Narrative Form in Early Modern England.” ELH 69.3: 617-648. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  442. Brunon-Ernst, Anne (2012) Beyond Foucault: New Perspectives on the Panopticon. New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  443. Cottell, Fran, and Marianne Mueller (2020) “From Pain to Pleasure: Panopticon Dreams and Pentagon Petal.” Bentham and the Arts. Ed. Anthony Julius, Malcolm Quinn and Philip Schofield. London: UCL Press. 244-269. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  444. Dannenberg, Hilary P. (2005) “Plot.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Ed. David Herman, Manfred Jahn and Marie-Laure Ryan. London: Routledge. 435-439. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  445. Draper, Tony (2002) “An Introduction to Jeremy Bentham’s Theory of Punishment.” Web. Journal of Bentham Studies 5. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  446. Evans, Robin (1982) The Fabrication of Virtue: English Prison Architecture, 1750-1840. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  447. Fludernik, Monika (2017) “Panopticisms: From Fantasy to Metaphor and Reality.” Textual Practice 31.1: 1-26. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  448. Fludernik, Monika (2019) Metaphors of Confinement: the Prison in Fact, Fiction and Fantasy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  449. Foucault, Michel (1995) Discipline and Punish; the Birth of the Prison [1975]. Trans. Alan Sheridan. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  450. Helgerson, Richard (1992) Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  451. Herivel, Tara, and Paul Wright (2003) Ed. Prison Nation: The Warehousing of America’s Poor. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  452. Mead, Rebecca (2017) “Margaret Atwood, the Prophet of Dystopia.” Web. The New Yorker, 10 April. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  453. Miceli, Barbara (2019) “Margaret Atwood’s The Heart Goes Last: Panopticism, Discipline, Society, and Utopia.” Web. Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory 5.2. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  454. Poynter, J. R. (1969) Society and Pauperism. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  455. Semple, Janet (1993) Bentham’s Prison: a Study of the Panopticon Penitentiary. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  456. Sentencing Project (2021) “Private Prisons in the United States.” Web. https://www.sentencingproject.org/publications/private-prisons-united-states/. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  457. US Department of Justice (2016) Review of Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Monitoring of Contract Prisons. Web. https://oig.justice.gov/reports/review-federal-bureau-prisons-monitoring-contract-prisons. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  458. Wrobel, Claire (2010) “Gothique, réforme et panoptique.” Web. Revue d’Études Benthamiennes 7. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  459. Wrobel, Claire (2020) “At the Crossroads of Law and Literature; on the Role of Fiction in Jeremy Bentham’s Penal Theory.” Law and Literature 32.3: 415-435. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-213
  460. Bhabha, Homi K. (1994) The Location of Culture. London/New York: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  461. Bhattacharjee, Manash Firaq (2018) “Who Wrote Gandhi’s Autobiography of Errors.” The Wire. [5 August 2018.] Web. 12 March 2020: https://thewire.in/books/who-wrote-gandhis-autobiography-of-errors. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  462. Fludernik, Monika (1996) Towards a Natural Narratology. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  463. Gandhi, M. K. (1928) Satyagraha in South Africa. Trans. Valji Govindji Desai. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Trust. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  464. Gandhi, M. K. (2018) An Autobiography, or The Story of My Experiments with Truth. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  465. Gusdorf, Georges (1980) “Conditions and Limits of Autobiography.” Autobiography: Essays Theoretical and Critical. [1956] Ed. and trans. James Olney. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 28-48. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  466. Holden, Philipp (2008) Autobiography and Decolonization. Modernity, Masculinity, and the Nation-State. Madison, Wis.: Univ. of Wisconsin Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  467. Lejeune, Philippe (1989) “The Autobiographical Pact.” On Autobiography. Ed. Paul John Eakin. Trans. Katherine M. Leary. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minneapolis Press. 3-30. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  468. Löschnigg, Martin (2019) “Narratology.” Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction. Ed. Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter. 103-110. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  469. Malinar, Angelika (2019a) “India.” Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction. Ed. Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter. 967-985. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  470. Malinar, Angelika (2019b) “Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi: શત્યના પ્રયોગો અથવા આત્મકથા;सत्य के प्रयोग अथवा आत्मकथा (1925-1928) [An Autobiography or The Story of My Experiments With Truth].” Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction. Ed. Martina Wagner-Egelhaaf. Berlin/Boston: DeGruyter. 1703-1718. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  471. Mishra, Girish (1978) Agrarian Problems of Permanent Settlement. A Case Study of Champaran. New Delhi: People’s Publishing House. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  472. Ricoeur, Paul (1983-1985) Time and Narrative. Trans. By Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. Chicago/London: Univ. of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  473. Suhrud, Tridip (2018) “Introduction.” An Autobiography, or The Story of My Experiments with Truth. M. K. Gandhi. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  474. Wagner-Egelhaaf, Martina (2019) Ed. Handbook of Autobiography/Autofiction. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  475. Weintraub, Karl (1975) “Autobiography and Historical Consciousness.” Critical Inquiry 1: 821-848. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-233
  476. Banz, Stefan (2013) „Étant Donnés: Ein Nachwort.“ Marcel Duchamp: Étant Donnés. Hg. Jeff Wall. Nürnberg: Verlag für Moderne Kunst Nürnberg GmbH. 90-97. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  477. Beccaria, Cesare (2005 [1764]) Von den Verbrechen und von den Strafen (Dei delitti e delle pene). Aus dem Italienischen von Thomas Vornbaum. Berlin: BWV Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  478. Bentham, Jeremy (1995). The Panopticon Writings. Ed. Miran Božovič. London: Verso. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  479. Duchamp, Marcel, Michael R. Taylor und P. Andrew Lins (2009) Étant Donnés: Manual of Instructions / Marcel Duchamp. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  480. Fludernik, Monika (2013) Erzähltheorie: Eine Einführung. Darmstadt: WBG. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  481. Foucault, Michel (2008) Die Hauptwerke. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  482. Gold (1958) „Interview mit Marcel Duchamp.“ Übersetzt und annotiert von Serge Stauffer. Marcel Duchamp. Interviews und Statements. Hg. Graphische Sammlung Staatsgalerie Stuttgart durch Ulrike Gauss. 69. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  483. Gregoriou, Christiana (2011) Language, Ideology and Identity in Serial Killer Narratives. London: Routledge. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  484. Holzhey, Magdalena und Kornelia Röder (2021) Website zur Ausstellung Beuys & Duchamp: Künstler der Zukunft, 8. Oktober 2021 bis 16. Januar 2022 im Kaiser Wilhelm Museum in Kleefeld. DOI: https://Kunstmuseenkrefeld.De/De/Exhibitions/2021/Beuys-Duchamp-Kuenstler-Der-Zukunft. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  485. Johns, Jasper (1980) zitiert in Calvin Tomkins (2005) Off the Wall: A Portrait of Robert Rauschenberg. London: Picador. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  486. Kächele, Andreas (2007) Der Strafrechtliche Schutz vor Unbefugten Bildaufnahmen (§ 201a StGB). Band 513. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  487. Leipold, Klaus, Mark Alexander Zöller und Michael Tsambikakis (2020) Anwaltkommentar StGB. 3. Auflage. Heidelberg: Müller. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  488. Lombroso, Cesare (2006) Criminal Man. Durham: Duke Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  489. Molderings, Herbert (2012) Die Nackte Wahrheit: Zum Spätwerk von Marcel Duchamp. München: Carl Hanser Verlag. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  490. Pergande, Frank (Juli 2017) „Kunst als Krimi: Die Schweriner Oberamtsanwältin Ulrike Tabbert geht auf Tätersuche ins Museum.“ Frankfurter Allgemeine Magazin. 36-37. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  491. Röder, Kornelia (2019) „Marcel Duchamp: Transformation Als Künstlerisches Konzept.“ Marcel Duchamp: Das Unmögliche Sehen. Hg. Gerhard Graulich, Kornelia Röder und Patricia Dick. Dresden: Sandstein Verlag. 34-55. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  492. Sartre, Jean-Paul (1994) „Das Sein und Das Nichts. Versuch einer Phänomenologischen Ontologie [1943].“ Übersetzt von Hans Schöneberg und Traugott König. Gesammelte Werke. Philosophische Schriften I. Hg. Jean-Paul Sartre. Paris: Rowohlt. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  493. Schwarz, Arturo (2000) The Complete Works of Marcel Duchamp. New York: Delano Greenidge Editions. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  494. Schwering, Gregor (2015) „‚Über das Auge triumphiert der Blick‘: Perspektiven des Voyeurismus.“ Big Brother: Beobachtungen (Masse und Medium). Hg. Friedrich Balke, Gregor Schwering und Urs Stäheli. Bielefeld: transcript. 129-150. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  495. Surette, Ray (2009) The Entertainment Media and the Social Construction of Crime and Justice. Crime and Media Band 2. Hg. Yvonne Jewkes. London: Sage Publications. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  496. Taylor, Michael R. (2009) (Hg.) Marcel Duchamp: Étant Donnés. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Museum of Art in association with Yale Univ. Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  497. Uhl, Katharina and Ulrike Tabbert (2020) Täter im Bild: Betrachtungen zwischen Kunstgeschichte und Kriminologie. Wien: VfmK Verlag für moderne Kunst GmbH. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249
  498. Wall, Jeff. „Étant Donnés.“ Marcel Duchamp: Étant Donnés. Hg. ders. Nürnberg: Verlag für Moderne Kunst Nürnberg GmbH. 65-89. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783956509643-249

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Download complete (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media