Yes, We Can! Or: Why the Reference for a Preliminary Ruling is not the Monopoly of the Executing Judge in Mutual Recognition Cases Involving the Surrender of Requested Persons

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: EuCLR European Criminal Law Review Volume 9 (2019), Edition 1
No access

European Criminal Law Review

Volume 9 (2019), Edition 1


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Publication year
2019
ISSN-Online
2193-5505
ISSN-Print
2191-7442

Chapter information


No access

Volume 9 (2019), Edition 1

Yes, We Can! Or: Why the Reference for a Preliminary Ruling is not the Monopoly of the Executing Judge in Mutual Recognition Cases Involving the Surrender of Requested Persons

Buy in shop(external link, opens in a new window)
Authors:
ISSN-Print
2191-7442
ISSN-Online
2193-5505


Preview:

The competence of the issuing judge in mutual recognition cases to refer for a preliminary ruling before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) is a complex question. The ECJ has nevertheless recognized that competence in its ruling in the AY case, of 25 July 2018. In this paper, the impact of that ruling on various proceedings against Catalan pro-independence leaders is analysed and some guidelines are suggested for the drafting of a future referral for a preliminary ruling from the Spanish Supreme Court.

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex
No access
You do not have access to this content.