Gazprom und andere – force majeure für Staatsunternehmen? Das Zusammenspiel von völkerrechtlicher Staatenverantwortlichkeit, internationalem Wirtschaftsrecht und privatem Handelsrecht

Table of contents

Bibliographic information


Cover of Volume: ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien Volume 26 (2023), Issue 4
Open Access Full access

ZEuS Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien

Volume 26 (2023), Issue 4


Authors:
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright Year
2023
ISSN-Online
2942-3589
ISSN-Print
1435-439X

Chapter information


Open Access Full access

Volume 26 (2023), Issue 4

Gazprom und andere – force majeure für Staatsunternehmen? Das Zusammenspiel von völkerrechtlicher Staatenverantwortlichkeit, internationalem Wirtschaftsrecht und privatem Handelsrecht


Authors:
ISSN-Print
1435-439X
ISSN-Online
2942-3589


Preview:

Force majeure is a recognized excuse from performance of contractual obligations in national legal systems and in the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), as well as a regular component of international commercial/supply contracts. Energy supply contracts also often contain such clauses. Currently, such contractual clauses are of interest with regard to the suspension of gas deliveries from Russia by the Russian state-owned company Gazprom. It is recognized in national court and international arbitration practice that, apart from special exceptional situations, state-owned enterprises can also invoke force majeure, even if the event triggering the force majeure is the responsibility of the state, which is the sole or majority shareholder of the state-owned enterprise. This jurisprudence is in line with the strict separation of state and state-owned enterprise as recognized, inter alia, in public international law on state responsibility, in international investment protection law and in WTO law. However, there is increasing criticism of this approach and more and more international regulatory efforts that relativize the strict separation thesis. This may also have an impact on the interpretation of force majeure clauses.

Bibliography


  1. BERNARDI, FRANK J., Der Ukraine-Krieg als Fall der Force Majeure im deutschen Recht, UKuR 2022, Heft 12, S. 435–437 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  2. BÖCKSTIEGEL, KARL-HEINZ, Arbitration and State Enterprises, Den Haag, 1984 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  3. BÖCKSTIEGEL, KARL-HEINZ, The Legal Rules Applicable in International Commercial Arbitration Involving States or State-Controlled Entities, in: 60 Years of ICC Arbitration – A Look at the Future Paris, 1984, S. 117–140 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  4. BORLINI, LEONARDO, The Leviathan goes to the market: A critical evaluation of the rules governing state-owned enterprises in trade agreements, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2022, Jg. 33, Heft 2, S. 313–334 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  5. BROCHES, ARON, Selected Essays: World Bank, ICSID, and Other Subjects of Public and Private International Law, Dordrecht, 1995 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  6. CRAWFORD, JAMES, The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries, Cambridge, 2002 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  7. DENISON, M. J., Force majeure clauses in LNG sales and purchase agreements: how do they stand up during the Covid-19 pandemic?, Journal of World Energy Law, 2011, Jg. 14, Heft 2, S. 88–99 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  8. DISHEV, MIHAIL/HOFFMANN, PHILIPP, Ukraine-Krieg, EU-Sanktionen und Inflation als Act of God/Force Majeure/Höhere Gewalt?, Neue Juristische Online Zeitung, 2022, Heft 48, S. 1473–1478 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  9. GAO, HENRY S., A Rule-based Solution to the Appellate Body Crisis, and Why the MPIA Would Not Work, 2021, verfügbar auf: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3767926 (27.9.2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  10. HAYWOOD, KIRK, The Treatment of State Enterprises in the WTO & Plurilateral Trade Agreements, Emerging Issues Briefing Note (3), The Commonwealth Secretariat, März 2016, verfügbar unter: https://production-new-commonwealth-files.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/migrated/inline/StateOwned%20EnterprisesTPP1008.pdf (27.9.2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  11. MARAVILLA, CHRISTOPHER S., The Ability of a State-Owned Enterprise to Declare Force Majeure Based Upon Actions of the State, The Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago-Kent, 2022, Jg. 2, S. 82–90, verfügbar auch auf SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2924185 (27.9.2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  12. MATSUSHITA, MITSUO, Interplay of Competition Law and Free Trade Agreements in Regulating State-Owned Enterprises, German Law Journal, 2023, Jg. 24, Heft 1, S. 243–268, verfügbar unter: doi:10.1017/glj.2023.8 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  13. NAKAGAWA, JUNJI, Regulatory Harmonization Through FTAs and BITs: Regulation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), July 10, 2012, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), 3rd Biennial Global Conference, verfügbar auf SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2103237 (27.9.2023) Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  14. SU, XUEJI, From Effect to Behaviour: Regulating State-Owned Enterprises as Competitors in Trade Agreements, Journal of World Trade, 2023, Jg. 57, Heft 3, S. 531–554 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  15. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN, Investment Law and Sovereign Wealth Funds, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Griebel, Jörn; Hobe, Stephan; Reinisch, August (eds.), International Investment Law, Baden-Baden/München/Oxford 2015, S. 1802–1816 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  16. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN, Transnationales Wirtschaftsrecht aus öffentlich-rechtlicher Perspektive, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft – Archiv für Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, 2022, Jg. 101, Heft 4, S. 404–420 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  17. TIETJE, CHRISTIAN/SACHER, VINCENT, The New Anti-Dumping Methodology of the European Union: A Breach of WTO Law?, in: Bungenberg, Marc; Hahn, Michael; Herrmann, Christoph; Müller-Ibold, Till (Hrsg.) The Future of Trade Defence Instruments. European Yearbook of International Economic Law, Berlin u.a., 2018, S. 89–105 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  18. VIDIGAL, GERALDO, Attribution in the WTO: the Limits of “Sufficient Government Involvement”, Journal of International Trade and Arbitration Law, Special Issue, 2017, Jg. 6, S. 133–160 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  19. WILLEMYNS, INES, Disciplines on State-Owned Enterprises in International Economic Law: Are We Moving in the Right Direction?, Journal of International Economic Law, 2016, Jg. 19, Heft 3, S. 657–680 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654
  20. ZHOU, WEIHUAN, Rethinking the (CP)TPP as a Model for Regulation of Chinese State-Owned Enterprises, Journal of International Economic Law, 2021, Jg. 24, Heft 3, S. 572–590 Open Google Scholar DOI: 10.5771/1435-439X-2023-4-654

Citation


Download RIS Download BibTex