How Race Affects Simply Having versus Actually Choosing: Cross-Race Political Discussion Partners

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of book: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Full access

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Authors:
Series
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Volume
35
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

How Race Affects Simply Having versus Actually Choosing: Cross-Race Political Discussion Partners

Authors:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. References Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  2. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  3. Amsalem, E., Merkley, E., and Loewen, P. J. (2022). Does talking to the other side reduce inter-party hostility? Evidence from three studies. Political Communication, 39, 61-78. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  4. Appiah, O. (2018). Cultural voyeurism: A new framework for understanding race, ethnicity, and mediated intergroup interaction. Journal of Communication, 68, 233-242. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  5. Appiah, O., Eveland, W., Jr., Bullock, O. M., and Coduto, K. D. (2022). Why we can’t talk openly about race: The impact of race and partisanship on respondents’ perceptions of intergroup conversations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 25, 434-452. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  6. Appiah, O., Knobloch-Westerwick, S., and Alter, S. (2013). Ingroup favoritism and outgroup derogation: Effects of news valence, character race, and recipient race on selective news reading. Journal of Communication, 63, 517-534. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  7. Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosocial theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 26-54. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  8. Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60, 680-700. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  9. Carlson, T. N., Abrajano, M., and Bedolla, L. G. (2020). Talking politics: Political discussion networks & the new American electorate. New York: Oxford University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  10. Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167-207. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  11. Cohn, N., and Quealy, K. (2020, June 10). How public opinion has moved on Black Lives Matter. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/06/10/upshot/black-lives-matter-attitudes.html Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  12. Comas-Díaz, L., and Jacobsen, F. M. (2001). Ethnocultural allodynia. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 10, 246-252. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  13. Dys-Steenbergen, O., Wright, S. C., and Aron, A. (2016). Self-expansion motivation improves cross-group interactions and enhances self-growth. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 60-71. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  14. Echols, L., and Graham, S. (2013). Birds of a different feather: How do cross-ethnic friends flock together? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 59, 461-488. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  15. Eddo-Lodge, R. (2020). Why I’m no longer talking to white people about race. Bloomsbury Publishing. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  16. Enos, R. D. (2017). The space between us: Social geography and politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  17. Eveland, W. P., Jr., and Appiah, O. (2021). A national conversation about race? Political discussion across lines of racial and partisan difference. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 6, 187-213. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  18. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Appiah, O., and Beck, P. A. (2018). Americans are more exposed to difference than we think: Capturing hidden exposure to political and racial difference. Social Networks, 52, 192-200. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  19. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Coduto, K. D., Appiah, O., and Bullock, O. M. (2020). Listening during political conversations: Traits and situations. Political Communication, 37, 656-677. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  20. Eveland, W. P., Jr., and Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  21. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Song, H., Hutchens, M. J., and Levitan, L. C. (2019). Not being accurate is not quite the same as being inaccurate: Variations in reported (in)accuracy of perceptions of political views of network members due to uncertainty. Communication Methods and Measures, 13, 305-311. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  22. Gil de Zúñiga, H., and Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397-421. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  23. Gilberstadt, H. (2020, June 5). A month before George Floyd’s death, black and white Americans differed sharply in confidence in the police. Pew Research Center. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/06/05/a-month-before-george-floyds-death-black-and-white-americans-differed-sharply-in-confidence-in-the-police/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  24. Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., and Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? Using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography, 46, 103-125. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  25. Heatherly, K. A., Lu, Y., and Lee, J. K. (2017). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19, 1271-1289. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  26. Hofstra, B., Corten, R., van Tubergan, F., and Ellison, N. (2017). Sources of segregation in social networks: A novel approach using Facebook. American Sociological Review, 82, 625-656. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  27. Hutchens, M. J., Hmielowski, J. D., and Beam, M. A. (2019). Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization. Communication Monographs, 86, 357-376. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  28. Huber, G. A., and Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79, 269-283. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  29. Huckfeldt, R., and Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  30. Huckfeldt, R. R., Johnson, P. E., and Sprague, J. D. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  31. Hutchens, M. J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Morey, A. C., and Sokhey, A. (2018). Evaluating summary measures of heterogeneous political discussion: The critical roles of excluded cases and discussion with people holding extreme views. Communication Methods and Measures, 12, 276-294. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  32. Iyengar, S., and Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59, 19-39. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  33. Kim, Y., Hsu, S-H., and Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63, 498-516. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  34. Kleinman, S. B., and Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2015, November). Communicating politics without talking: How people infer political preferences using limited visual information. Presented to the Communication and Social Cognition division of the National Communication Association, Las Vegas. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  35. Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, E. A., and McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120-134. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  36. Kossinets, G., and Watts, D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 405-450. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  37. Kreuter, F., Presser, S., and Tourangeau, R. (2008). Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and Web surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 847-865. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  38. Kubin, E., and von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45, 188-206. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  39. McGuire, W. J., McGuire, C. V., Child, P., and Fujioka, T. (1978). Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one’s ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 511-520. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  40. Mendelberg, T., and Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication, 17, 169-191. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  41. Merolla, J. L., Sellers, A. H., and Fowler, D. J. (2013). Descriptive representation, political efficacy, and African Americans in the 2008 presidential election. Political Psychology, 34, 863-875. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  42. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  43. Pew Research Center. (2016). On views of race and inequality, Blacks and Whites are worlds apart. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/06/ST_2016.06.27_Race-Inequality-Final.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  44. Pew Research Center. (2018, March). Wide gender gap, growing educational divide in voters’ party identification. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/03-20-18-Party-Identification-CORRECTED.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  45. Pew Research Center. (2019, April). Race in America 2019. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2019/04/09/race-in-america-2019/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  46. Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  47. Quillian, L., and Campbell, M. E. (2003). Beyond black and white: The present and future of multiracial friendship segregation. American Sociological Review, 68, 540-566. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  48. Rogers, E. M., and Bhowmik, D. K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523-538. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  49. Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy vs. understanding: How orientations toward political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452-480. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  50. Rule, N. O., and Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS ONE, 5, e8733. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  51. Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., and Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315-338. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  52. Schmitt-Beck, R., and Lup, O. (2013). Seeking the soul of democracy: A review of recent research into citizens’ political talk culture. Swiss Political Science Review, 19, 513-538. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  53. Schmitt-Beck, R., and Schnaudt, C. (2023, online first). Everyday political talk with strangers: Evidence on a neglected arena of the deliberative system. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  54. Scott, E. (2020, June 10). What’s different about this moment? Primarily the number of Americans supporting protests over racial justice. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/10/whats-different-about-this-moment-primarily-number-americans-supporting-protests-over-racial-injustice/ Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  55. Shafranek, R. M. (2021). Political considerations in nonpolitical decisions: A conjoint analysis of roommate choice. Political Behavior, 43, 271-300. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  56. Smith, J. A., McPherson, M., and Smith-Lovin, L. (2014). Social distance in the United States: Sex, race, religion, age, and education homophily among confidants, 1985-2004. American Sociological Review, 79, 432-456. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  57. Song, H., and Boomgaarden, H. (2017). Dynamic spirals put to test: An agent-based model of reinforcing spirals between selective exposure, interpersonal networks, and attitude polarization. Journal of Communication, 67, 256-281. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  58. Trawalter, S., and Richeson, J. A. (2008). Let’s talk about race, Baby! When Whites’ and Blacks’ interracial contact experiences diverge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1214-1217. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  59. Walsh, K. C. (2007). Talking about race: Community dialogues and the politics of difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  60. Wimmer, A., and Lewis, K. (2010). Beyond and below racial homophily: ERG models of a friendship network documented on Facebook. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 583-642. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  61. Online Appendix Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  62. https://www.nomos-shop.de/shopfiles/anhang_978-3-7560-0800-1_mat_online_anhang.pdf Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137
  63. hit Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-137

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Download complete (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media