Electoral integrity and voting: The interplay of individual perceptions and contextual conditions

Table of contents

Bibliographic information

Cover of book: Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie
Open Access Full access

Informationsflüsse, Wahlen und Demokratie

Festschrift für Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Authors:
Series
Studien zur Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung
Volume
35
Publisher
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Copyright year
2023
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3

Chapter information

Open Access Full access

Electoral integrity and voting: The interplay of individual perceptions and contextual conditions

Authors:
ISBN-Print
978-3-7560-0800-1
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-1555-3
Preview:

Bibliography

  1. References Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  2. Alvarez, R.M., Hall, T.E., Llewellyn, M.H., 2008. Are Americans Confident Their Ballots Are Counted? The Journal of Politics 70, 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080730 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  3. Arzheimer, K., Evans, J., Lewis-Beck, M.S. (Eds.), 2017. The Sage Handbook of Electoral Behaviour. Sage, Los Angeles. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  4. Berlinski, N., Doyle, M., Guess, A.M., Levy, G., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J.M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., 2023. The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections. Journal of Experimental Political Science 10, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2021.18 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  5. Birch, S., 2008. Electoral Institutions and Popular Confidence in Electoral Processes: A Cross-national Analysis. Electoral Studies 27, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.005 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  6. Birch, S., 2010. Perceptions of Electoral Fairness and Voter Turnout. Comparative Political Studies 43, 1601–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010374021 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  7. Birch, S., 2011. Electoral Malpractice. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  8. Bowler, S., Brunell, T., Donovan, T., Gronke, P., 2015. Election Administration and Perceptions of Fair Elections. Electoral Studies 38, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.01.004 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  9. Bratton, M., 2008. Vote Buying and Violence in Nigerian Election Campaigns. Electoral Studies 27, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.04.013 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  10. Carreras, M., İrepoğlu, Y., 2013. Trust in Elections, Vote Buying, and Turnout in Latin America. Electoral Studies, Special Symposium: The New Research Agenda on Electoral Integrity 32, 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.012 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  11. Clark, A., 2017. Identifying the Determinants of Electoral Integrity and Administration in Advanced Democracies: the Case of Britain. European Political Science Review 9, 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773916000060 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  12. Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C.H., Lindberg, S.I., Teorell, J., Alizada, N., Altman, D., Bernhard, M., Cornell, A., Fish, M.S., Gastaldi, L., Gjerløw, H., Glynn, A., Grahn, S., Hicken, A., Hindle, G., Ilchenko, N., Kinzelbach, K., Krusell, J., Marquardt, K.L., McMann, K., Mechkova, V., Medzihorsky, J., Paxton, P., Pemstein, D., Pernes, J., Ryd´en, O., von Römer, J., Seim, B., Sigman, R., Skaaning, S.-E., Staton, J., Sundström, A., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Wig, T., Wilson, S., Ziblatt, D., 2022. V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v12. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  13. EVS/WVS, 2022. Joint EVS/WVS 2017-2022 Dataset. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.14023. ZA7505 Data file version 3.0.0. GESIS, Cologne. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  14. Fisher, J., Sällberg, Y., 2020. Electoral Integrity – The Winner Takes it All? Evidence from Three British General Elections. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22, 404–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120912668 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  15. Flesken, A., Hartl, J., 2018. Party Support, Values, and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity. Political Psychology 39, 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12431 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  16. Fortin-Rittberger, J., Harfst, P., Dingler, S.C., 2017. The Costs of Electoral Fraud: Establishing the Link between Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 27, 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  17. Garnett, H.A., 2019. On the Front Lines of Democracy: Perceptions of Electoral Officials and Democratic Elections. Democratization 26, 1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1641797 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  18. Garnett, H.A., James, T.S., 2021. Measuring Electoral Integrity: Using Practitioner Knowledge to Assess Elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 31, 348–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2020.1824186 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  19. Garnett, H.A., James, T.S., MacGregor, M., 2022. Year in Elections Global Report: 2019-2021. The Electoral Integrity Project. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  20. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., Puranen, B., 2022. World Values Survey Trend File (1981-2022) Cross-National Data-Set. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.23. Data File Version 2.0.0. Madrid & Vienna: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  21. Heisig, J.P., Schaeffer, M., 2019. Why You Should Always Include a Random Slope for the Lower-Level Variable Involved in a Cross-Level Interaction. European Sociological Review 35, 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  22. Jost, J.T., 2019. A Quarter Century of System Justification Theory: Questions, Answers, Criticisms, and Societal Applications. British Journal of Social Psychology 58, 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  23. Karp, J.A., Nai, A., Norris, P., 2018. Dial ‘F’ for Fraud: Explaining Citizens’ Suspicions about Elections. Electoral Studies 53, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.01.010 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  24. Martínez i Coma, F., van Ham, C., 2015. Can Experts Judge Elections? Testing the Validity of Expert Judgments for Measuring Election Integrity. European Journal of Political Research 54, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12084 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  25. McCann, J.A., Domı́nguez, J.I., 1998. Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior. Electoral Studies 17, 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00026-2 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  26. Nohlen, D., 2014. Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem, 7th ed. Budrich, Opladen. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  27. Norris, P., 2019. Do Perceptions of Electoral Malpractice Undermine Democratic Satisfaction? The US in Comparative Perspective. International Political Science Review 40, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118806783 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  28. Norris, P., 2018. Electoral integrity, in: Fisher, J., Fieldhouse, E., Franklin, M.N., Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M., Wlezien, C. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge, Abingdon, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315712390.ch18 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  29. Norris, P., 2014. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge University Press. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  30. Norris, P., 2013. The New Research Agenda Studying Electoral Integrity. Electoral Studies, Special Symposium: The New Research Agenda on Electoral Integrity 32, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.015 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  31. Norris, P., Frank, R.W., Martínez i Coma, F., 2014. Measuring Electoral Integrity around the World: A New Dataset. PS: Political Science & Politics 47, 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514001061 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  32. Norris, P., Grömping, M., 2019a. Electoral Integrity Worldwide. University of Sydney, Sydney. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  33. Norris, P., Grömping, M., 2019b. Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Data, version PEI-7.0. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PDYRWL Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  34. Norris, P., Martinez i Coma, F., Grömping, M., 2015. Perceptions of Electoral Integrity Data, version PEI-3.0. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/29114 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  35. Schmitt-Beck, R., Faas, T., 2021. Wie frei und fair war die Bundestagswahl 2017? Elektorale Integrität aus Sicht der Bürgerinnen und Bürger, in: Weßels, B., Schoen, H. (Eds.), Wahlen und Wähler: Analysen aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2017. Springer, Wiesbaden, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33582-3_8 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  36. Schnaudt, C., 2023a. Exit or Voice? Behavioral Implications of Electoral-Integrity Beliefs in Germany. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 64, 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00403-9 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  37. Schnaudt, C., 2023b. Sowing the Seeds of Skepticism? Electoral-integrity Beliefs among Political Elites. Electoral Studies 84, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102654 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  38. Schnaudt, C., 2023c. Mind the Gap(s): Winning, Losing, and Perceptions of Electoral Integrity in Mixed-member Proportional Systems. Electoral Studies 83, 102611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102611 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  39. Schnaudt, C., Hahn, C., Heppner, E., 2021. Distributive and Procedural Justice and Political Trust in Europe. Frontiers in Political Science 3, 24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642232 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  40. Segatti, P., Schmitt, H., van der Eijk, C., 2021. Comparing Individual Behaviour across Contexts: The Core Research Question, in: Schmitt, H., Segatti, P., Eijk, C. van der (Eds.), Consequences of Context: How the Social, Political, and Economic Environment Affects Voting. ECPR Press, London; Lanham, 1–20. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  41. Simpser, A., 2012. Does Electoral Manipulation Discourage Voter Turnout? Evidence from Mexico. The Journal of Politics 74, 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000333 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  42. Smets, K., van Ham, C., 2013. The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-analysis of Individual-level Research on Voter Turnout. Electoral Studies 32, 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  43. van Deth, J.W., 2018. Voting and the Expanding Repertoire of Participation, in: Fisher, J., Fieldhouse, E., Franklin, M.N., Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M., Wlezien, C. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Elections, Voting Behavior and Public Opinion. Routledge, Abingdon, 96–107. Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485
  44. van Ham, C., 2015. Getting Elections right? Measuring Electoral Integrity. Democratization 22, 714–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.877447 Open Google Scholar doi.org/10.5771/9783748915553-485

Citation

Download RIS Download BibTex

Downloads

Download chapter (PDF) Download complete (PDF)

Notice

This work is protected by copyright and may only be used in accordance with the provisions of the Terms of Use and License Agreement. Any use of the work beyond this is expressly prohibited and will be prosecuted.

Share via email

Media