, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Ausgabe Teilzugriff

Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2

UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Autor:innen:
Zeitschrift:
UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Verlag:
 2020

Über die Zeitschrift

Die UFITA wurde 1928 als „Archiv für Urheber-, Film- und Theaterrecht“ gegründet und gehört seitdem zu den führenden Zeitschriften zum Recht des Geistigen Eigentums. Ab dem Jahr 2018 erscheint sie als interdisziplinäre Zeitschrift für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft. Als forschungsorientierte Archivzeitschrift mit wissenschaftlich höchstem Anspruch bietet die UFITA ein Forum für grundlagenorientierte Abhandlungen zum privaten und öffentlichen Urheber- und Medienrecht mit seinen interdisziplinären Bezügen sowie zur sozialwissenschaftlich orientierten Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft. In Aufsätzen und Gutachten namhafter Autoren werden grundlegende Fragestellungen und aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Urheber- und Medienrechtswissenschaft mit ihren rechtsphilosophischen, rechtshistorischen, methodologischen sowie ökonomischen Grundlagen adressiert. Gleichzeitig ist die UFITA künftig auch ein Forum, das interdisziplinäre Diskussionen sowie Publikationen auf dem Gebiet der Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft ermöglichen soll. Die Verbindungen zu internationaler Forschung sowie ein spezieller, auch rechtsvergleichender Fokus auf das europäische Recht und das Völkerrecht sind daher ebenso wichtig wie die Präsenz von WissenschaftlerInnen verschiedener disziplinärer Herkunft. Die UFITA hat einen Jahresumfang von ca. 300 Seiten, erscheint halbjährlich und enthält neben umfangreichen wissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen vertiefte Rezensionen zu ausgewählten Veröffentlichungen, die thematisch geordnet in Sammelrezensionen diskutiert werden. Des Weiteren findet sich in jeder Ausgabe eine deutsche und internationale Literaturübersicht, eine Zeitschriftenlese sowie ein Überblick aktueller Entscheidungen. Angestrebt wird eine Erweiterung um englischsprachige Beiträge. Die UFITA ist daher eine ideale Basis für sämtliche juristischen Berufszweige und all jene aus Wissenschaft und Praxis, die sich vertieft mit aktuellen Fragen der Medienentwicklung und -steuerung befassen.

Publikation durchsuchen


Bibliographische Angaben

ISSN-Print
2568-9185
ISSN-Online
2942-3511
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Sprache
Deutsch
Produkttyp
Ausgabe

Artikel

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 353 - 354
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Vollzugriff

Seite 355 - 357
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 358 - 389
Die Urheberrechts-Richtlinie 2001/29/EG verstößt gegen die Medienfreiheit gemäß Art. 11 Abs. 2 EUGRCh und Art. 10 EMRK. Die Ausnahmen und Beschränkungen der Urheberrechts-Richtlinie können einen angemessenen Ausgleich zwischen den Rechten des...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 390 - 429
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 430 - 494
Gemeinschaftsproduktionen gehören zu den prägenden Elementen des Filmgeschäfts. Die nationale und internationale Kooperation von Filmherstellern bündelt Ressourcen, diversifiziert Risiken und schafft einen kulturellen Mehrwert, den das Recht der...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Vollzugriff

Seite 495 - 528
Die Corona-Pandemie hat wie in einem Brennglas zweierlei für den Mediensektor gezeigt: einerseits die Wichtigkeit der Medien für die Information der Bürger (was an deutlich gestiegenen Nutzungszahlen von Qualitätsmedien ablesbar ist) und...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 529 - 542
Das Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz (i.F. NetzDG) war von Beginn an ein umstrittenes Gesetzesvorhaben, in- und außerhalb Deutschlands, und löste einen „Tsunami der politischen und wissenschaftlichen Empörung“1 aus. Dieses Gesetz steht für das...
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020
Autor:innen:

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 543 - 562
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020

Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 84 (2020), Heft 2
Artikel
Kein Zugriff

Seite 563 - 579
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, Baden-Baden 2020

Literaturverzeichnis (194 Einträge)

  1. Alba (2019) = Davey Alba: Facebook Discovers Fakes That Show Evolution of Disinformation, The New York Times, December 20, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/20/busin ess/facebook-ai-generated-profiles.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  2. Alexander / Gómez-Arestegui (2016) = Isabella Alexander / H. Tomás Gómez-Arestegui (Eds.): Research Handbook on the History of Copyright Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  3. Alpeyev (2018) = Pavel Alpeyev: SoftBank's Next Robot After Pepper Skips Chit Chat, Mops Floors, Bloomberg, November 19, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018- 11-19/softbank-s-next-robot-after-pepper-skips-chit-chat-mops-floors Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  4. American Artificial Intelligence Initiative (2020) = The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy: American Artificial Intelligence Initiative: Year One Annual Report, February 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/American-AI-Initiative-O ne-Year-Annual-Report.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  5. Anderson (2001) = Mark K. Anderson: 'Aaron': Art From the Machine, WIRED, May 12, 2001. Retrieved from: https://www.wired.com/2001/05/aaron-art-from-the-machine/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  6. Artificial Intelligence for Europe, COM(2018) 237 final = Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Artificial Intelligence for Europe, Brussels, COM(2018) 237 final, April 25, 2018. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/re p/1/2018/EN/COM-2018-237-F1-EN-MAIN-PART-1.PDF Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  7. Atabekov / Yastrebov (2018) = Atabek Atabekov / Oleg Yastrebov: Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence Across Countries: Legislation on the Move, European Research Studies Journal, Issue 4/2018, p. 774-782. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  8. Bahr (2020) = Sarah Bahr: The Star of This $70 Million Sci-Fi Film Is a Robot, The New York Times, July 24, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/24/movies/humanoid-robot-acto r.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  9. Bailey (2020) = Jason Bailey: Can Machine Learning Predict the Price of Art at Auction?, Harvard Data Science Review, April 30, 2020. Retrieved from: https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/1vdc2z91/ release/1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  10. Ball (2012) = Philip Ball: Iamus, classical music's computer composer, live from Malaga, The Guardian, July 1, 2012. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/music/2012/jul/01/iamus-compute r-composes-classical-music Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  11. Ballardini / He / Roos (2019) = Rosa Maria Ballardini / Kan He / Teemu Roos: AI-Generated Content: Authorship and Inventorship in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. In: Taina Pihlajarinne / Juha Vesala / Olli Honkkila: Online Distribution of Content in the EU, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2019, p. 117-135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  12. Bandy / Diakopoulos (2020) = Jack Bandy / Nicholas Diakopoulos: Auditing News Curation Systems: A Case Study Examining Algorithmic and Editorial Logic in Apple News, Proceedings of the Fourteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2020), 2020, p. 36-47. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  13. Barletta (2001) = Barbara A. Barletta: The Origins of the Greek Architectural Orders, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  14. Beckett (2015) = Stephen Beckett: Robo-journalism: How a Computer Describes a Sports Match, BBC, September 12, 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34204052 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  15. Beneke / Mackenrodt (2019) = Francisco Beneke / Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt: Artificial Intelligence and Collusion, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 1/2019, p. 109-134. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  16. Bennett / Daly (2020) = Belinda Bennett / Angela Daly: Recognising Rights for Robots: Can We? Will We? Should We?, Law, Innovation and Technology, Issue 1/2020, p. 60-80. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  17. Bently / Sherman (2009) = Lionel Bently / Brad Sherman: Intellectual Property Law, Third Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  18. Binctin (2019) = Nicolas Binctin: TDM: A Challenge for Artificial Intelligence, R.I.D.A. – Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur, October 2019, p. 5-32. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  19. Bonadio / McDonagh (2020) = Enrico Bonadio / Luke McDonagh: Artificial Intelligence as Producer and Consumer of Copyright Works: Evaluating the Consequences of Algorithmic Creativity, Intellectual Property Quarterly, Issue 2/2020, p. 112-137. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  20. Bonadio / McDonagh / Arvidsson (2018) = Enrico Bonadio / Luke McDonagh / Christopher Arvidsson: Intellectual Property Aspects of Robotics, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Issue 4/2018, p. 655-676. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  21. Bond (2019) = Toby Bond: AIPPI Congress Report 4: Copyright in AI Generated Works, The IPKat, September 27, 2019. Retrieved from: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2019/09/aippi-congress-report-4 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  22. -copyright-in-ai.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  23. Bond / Blair (2019) = Toby Bond / Sarah Blair: Artificial Intelligence & copyright: Section 9(3) or authorship without an author, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 6/2019, p. 423. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  24. Boxall (2019) = Andy Boxall: Huawei’s A.I. has finished Schubert’s Unfinished Symphony, and we’ve heard it, Digital Trends, February 6, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/ huawei-ai-unfinished-symphony/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  25. Boyden (2016) = Bruce E. Boyden: Emergent Works, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Issue 3/2016, p. 377-394. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  26. Bracha (2016) = Oren Bracha: United States Copyright, 1672-1909. In: Alexander / Gómez-Arestegui (2016), p. 335-371. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  27. Bridy (2012) = Annemarie Bridy: Coding Creativity: Copyright and the Artificially Intelligent Author, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  28. Stanford Technology Law Review, 2012, p. 1-28. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  29. Bringsjord / Ferrucci (2000) = Selmer Bringsjord / David Ferrucci: Artificial Intelligence and Literary Creativity: Inside the Mind of BRUTUS, a Storytelling Machine, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 2000. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  30. Broad (2020) = William J. Broad: A.I. Versus the Coronavirus, The New York Times, March 26, 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  31. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/26/science/ai-versus-the-coronavirus.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  32. Buccafusco (2016) = Christopher Buccafusco: A Theory of Copyright Authorship, Virginia Law Review, 2016, p. 1229-1295. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  33. CAHAI Third Meeting (2020) = Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI), Third Meeting, 27 March 2020, CAHAI-BU(2020)REP2, Strasbourg, April 7, 2020. Retrieved from: https://rm.co e.int/cahai-bu-2020-rep2-eng-07042020-final-/16809e2b4f Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  34. Carey (2020) = Benedict Carey: Can an Algorithm Predict the Pandemic’s Next Moves?, The New York Times, July 2, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/02/health/santillana-coron avirus-model-forecast.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  35. Castets-Renard (2020) = Céline Castets-Renard: The Intersection Between AI and IP: Conflict or Complementarity?, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 2/2020, p. 141-143. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  36. Chiou (2020) = Theodoros Chiou: Copyright Lessons on Machine Learning: What Impact on Algorithmic Art?, JIPITEC – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law, Issue 3/2019, p. 398-411. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  37. Cohn (2018) = Gabe Cohn: AI Art at Christie’s Sells for $432,500, The New York Times, October 25, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/arts/design/ai-art-sold-christies.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  38. Corrales / Fenwick / Forgó (2018) = Marcelo Corrales / Mark Fenwick / Nikolaus Forgó (Eds.): Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, Springer, Singapore, 2018. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  39. Craig / Kerr (2019) = Carys Craig / Ian Kerr: The Death of the AI Author, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper, March 25, 2019, p. 1-42. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3374951 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  40. Cropley (2019) = David H. Cropley: Homo Problematis Solvendis – Problem-solving Man, A History of Human Creativity, Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  41. Cross (2020) = Tim Cross: An Understanding of AI’s Limitations Is Starting to Sink In, The Economist, June 11, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.economist.com/technology-quarterly/2020/06/11 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  42. /an-understanding-of-ais-limitations-is-starting-to-sink-in Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  43. De Rouck (2019) = Florian De Rouck: Moral rights & AI environments: the unique bond between intelligent agents and their creations, GRUR International, Issue 4/2019, p. 432-436. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  44. Del Mar / Twining (2015) = Maksymilian Del Mar / William Twining (Eds.): Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice, Springer, Cham, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  45. Deltorn / Macrez (2018) = Jean-Marc Deltorn / Franck Macrez: Authorship in the Age of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No. 2018-10, August 1, 2018, p. 1-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  46. Denicola (2016) = Robert C. Denicola: Ex Machina: Copyright Protection for Computer-Generated Works, Rutgers University Law Review, 2016, p. 251-287. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  47. Desantes Real (2020) = Manuel Desantes Real: The Disruptive Nature of the So Called Fourth Industrial Revolution for Intellectual Property: Moving Societal Changes from Linear to Exponential. In: Christopher Heath / Anselm Kamperman Sanders / Anke Moerland (Eds.): Intellectual Property Law and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2020, p. 3-27. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  48. Dettling / Krüger (2019) = Heinz-Uwe Dettling / Stefan Krüger: Erste Schritte im Recht der Künstlichen Intelligenz – Entwurf der „Ethik-Leitlinien für eine vertrauenswürdige KI”, Multimedia und Recht, Issue 4/2019, p. 211-217. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  49. Devarapalli (2018) = Pratap Devarapalli: Machine Learning to Machine Owning: Redefining the Copyright Ownership from the Perspective of Australian, US, UK and EU Law, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 11/2018, p. 722-728. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  50. Dickenson / Morgan / Clark (2017) = Julia Dickenson / Alex Morgan / Birgit Clark: Creative Machines: Ownership of Copyright in Content Created by Artificial Intelligence Applications, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 8/2017, p. 457-460. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  51. Dornis (2019) = Tim W. Dornis: Der Schutz künstlicher Kreativität im Immaterialgüterrecht, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Issue 12/2019, p. 1252-1264. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  52. Dreyfuss (2020) = Rochelle C. Dreyfuss: The Challenges Facing IP Systems: Researching for the Future. In: Peter Drahos / Gustavo Ghidini / Hanns Ullrich (Eds.): Kritika: Essays on Intellectual Property – Volume 4, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, p. 1-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  53. Elkin-Koren (2017) = Niva Elkin-Koren: Fair Use by Design, UCLA Law Review, 2017, p. 1082-1100. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  54. Featherstone (2017) = Emma Featherstone: Introducing the Next Generation of Music Makers, The Guardian, August 29, 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/small-business-networ k/2017/aug/29/computer-write-music-jukedeck-artificial-intelligence Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  55. Fenwick / Vermeulen / Corrales (2018) = Mark Fenwick / Erik P. M. Vermeulen / Marcelo Corrales: Business and Regulatory Responses to Artificial Intelligence: Dynamic Regulation, Innovation Ecosystems and the Strategic Management of Disruptive Technology. In: Corrales / Fenwick / Forgó (2018), p. 81-103. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  56. Fildes (2020) = Nic Fildes: When AI Takes on Eurovision: Can a Computer Write a Hit Song?, Ars-Technica, May 11, 2020. Retrieved from: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/05/when-ai-takes-o n-eurovision-can-a-computer-write-a-hit-song/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  57. Fisher (2001) = William Fisher: Theories of Intellectual Property. In: Stephen Munzer (Ed.): New Essays in the Legal and Political Theory of Property, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001, p. 168-199. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  58. Flynn / Geiger / Quintais / Margoni / Sag / Guibault / Carroll (2020) = Sean Flynn / Christophe Geiger / João Pedro Quintais / Thomas Margoni / Matthew Sag / Lucie Guibault / Michael Carroll: Implementing User Rights for Research in the Field of Artificial Intelligence: A Call for International Action, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 7/2020, p. 393-398. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  59. Foucault (1984) = Michel Foucault: What Is an Author? In: Paul Rabinow (Ed.): The Foucault Reader, Pantheon Books, New York, 1984, p. 101-120. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  60. Fuller (1967) = Lon L. Fuller: Legal Fictions, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1967. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  61. Gadd (2016) = Ian Gadd: The Stationers’ Company in England Before 1710. In: Alexander / Gómez- Arestegui (2016), p. 81-95. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  62. Garde (2018) = Tanuja Garde: Artificial Intelligence and Induced Infringement, GRUR International, Issue 12/2018, p. 1132-1138. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  63. Gervais (1991) = Daniel J. Gervais: The Protection Under International Copyright Law of Works Created with or by Computers, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 5/1991, p. 628-654. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  64. Gervais (2002) = Daniel J. Gervais: Feist Goes Global: A Comparative Analysis of the Notion of Originality in Copyright Law, Journal of the Copyright Society U.S.A., Summer 2002, p. 949-981. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  65. Gervais (2020a) = Daniel J. Gervais: Is Intellectual Property Law Ready for Artificial Intelligence?, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  66. GRUR International, Issue 2/2020, p. 117-118. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  67. Gervais (2020b) = Daniel J. Gervais: The Machine as Author, Iowa Law Review, 2020, p. 2053-2106. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  68. Ginsburg (1990) = Jane C. Ginsburg: A Tale of Two Copyrights: Literary Property in Revolutionary France and America, Tulane Law Review, Issue 5/1990, p. 991-1031. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  69. Ginsburg (1992) = Jane C. Ginsburg: No “Sweat”? Copyright and Other Protection of Works of Information after Feist v. Rural Telephone, Columbia Law Review, 1992, p. 338-388. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  70. Ginsburg (2016) = Jane C. Ginsburg: Proto-Property in Literary and Artistic Works: Sixteenth-Century Papal Printing Privileges. In: Alexander / Gómez-Arestegui (2016), p. 237-267. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  71. Ginsburg (2018) = Jane C. Ginsburg: People Not Machines: Authorship and What It Means in the Berne Convention, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 2/2018, p. 131-135. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  72. Ginsburg / Budiardjo (2019) = Jane C. Ginsburg / Luke Ali Budiardjo: Authors and Machines, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 2019, p. 343-456. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  73. Gleick (2011) = James Gleick: The Information – A History, a Theory, a Flood, Vintage Books, New York, 2011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  74. Goldstein / Hugenholtz (2010) = Paul Goldstein / Bernt Hugenholtz: International Copyright – Principles, Law, and Practice, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  75. Grady (2019) = Denise Grady: A.I. Comes to the Operating Room, The New York Times, December 13, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/06/health/artificial-intelligence-brain-ca ncer.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  76. Grimmelmann (2016) = James Grimmelmann: There’s No Such Thing as a Computer-Authored Work Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  77. – And It’s a Good Thing, Too, Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts, Issue 3/2016, p. 403-416. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  78. Grosse Ruse-Khan (2020) = Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan: Automated Copyright Enforcement Online: From Blocking to Monetization of User-Generated Content, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper no. 8/2020, p. 1-18. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.c om/abstract=3565071 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  79. Grossman (2011) = Lev Grossman: 2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal, Time Magazine, February 10, 2011. Retrieved from: http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2048299,00.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  80. Grubow (2018) = Jared Vasconcellos Grubow: O.K. Computer: The Devolution of Human Creativity and Granting Musical Copyrights to Artificially Intelligent Joint Authors, Cardozo Law Review, 2018, p. 387-423. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  81. Guadamuz (2016) = Andres Guadamuz: The Monkey Selfie: Copyright Lessons for Originality in Photographs and Internet Jurisdiction, Internet Policy Review, Issue 1/2016, p. 1-12. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  82. Guadamuz (2017) = Andres Guadamuz: Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of Originality in Artificial Intelligence Generated Works, Intellectual Property Quarterly, Issue 2/2017, p. 169-186. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  83. Haigney (2019) = Sophie Haigney: Wondering Who Did That Painting? There’s an App (or Two) for That, The New York Times, September 11, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/0 9/11/arts/design/smartphone-art-app.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  84. Hao (2019) = Karen Hao: OpenAI has released the largest version yet of its fake-news-spewing AI, MIT Technology Review, August 29, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/ 614237/openai-released-its-fake-news-ai-gpt-2/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  85. He (2019) = Tianxiang He: The Sentimental Fools and the Fictitious Authors: Rethinking the Copyright Issues of AI-generated Contents in China, Asia Pacific Law Review, Issue 2/2019, p. 218-238. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  86. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019) = High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence: A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines, April 8, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.kowi.de/Portaldata/2/Resources/fp/Artificial-Intelligence-Definition.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  87. Hill (2020) = Kashmir Hill: Wrongfully Accused by an Algorithm, The New York Times, June 24, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/technology/facial-recognition-arrest. html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  88. Horseman (2020) = Jeff Horseman: World premiere in November: Computer completes Beethoven’s 10th Symphony, The News Mansion, March 30, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.archyde.com/ world-premiere-in-november-computer-completes-beethovens-10th-symphony/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  89. Hristov (2017) = Kalin Hristov: Artificial Intelligence and the Copyright Dilemma, IDEA, Issue 3/2017, p. 431-454. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  90. Hristov (2020) = Kalin Hristov: Artificial Intelligence and the Copyright Survey, Journal of Science Policy & Governance, Issue 1/2020, p. 1-18. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  91. Hugenholtz (2019) = P. Bernt Hugenholtz: Neighbouring Rights Are Obsolete, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 8/2019, p. 1006-1011. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  92. Huggler (2019) = Justin Huggler: Computer is set to complete Beethoven's unfinished symphony, The Telegraph, December 13, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/12/13/co mputer-set-complete-beethovens-unfinished-symphony/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  93. Ihalainen (2018) = Jani Ihalainen: Computer Creativity: Artificial Intelligence and Copyright, Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, Issue 9/2018, p. 724-728. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  94. Johnson (1997) = George Johnson: Undiscovered Bach? No, a Computer Wrote It, The New York Times, November 11, 1997. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/11/science/undiscov ered-bach-no-a-computer-wrote-it.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  95. Johnson (2015) = Julia Johnson: Database Protection a Reality? How the Professional and Fantasy Sporting World Could Benefit from a Sui Generis Intellectual Property Right, Intellectual Property Journal, 2015, p. 237-256. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  96. Judge / Gervais (2009) = Elizabeth F. Judge / Daniel J. Gervais: Of Silos and Constellations: Comparing Notions of Originality in Copyright Law, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 2009, p. 375-408. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  97. Keegan (2020) = Rebecca Keegan: A.I. Robot Cast in Lead Role of $70M Sci-Fi Film, The Hollywood Reporter, June 24, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/ai-robot-cast-l ead-role-70m-sci-fi-film-1300068 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  98. Keh (2019) = Andrew Keh: Gymnastics’ Latest Twist? Robot Judges That See Everything, The New York Times, October 10, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/10/sports/olymp ics/gymnastics-robot-judges.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  99. Kelly (2020) = Éanna Kelly: EU Struggles to Go from Talk to Action on Artificial Intelligence, Science|Business, July 16, 2020. Retrieved from: https://sciencebusiness.net/news/eu-struggles-go- talk-action-artificial-intelligence Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  100. Kessel (2019) = Jonah M. Kessel: Killer Robots Aren’t Regulated. Yet, The New York Times, December 13, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/13/technology/autonomous-weapons Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  101. -video.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  102. Keßler (2017) = Oliver Keßler: Intelligente Roboter – neue Technologien im Einsatz – Voraussetzungen und Rechtsfolgen des Handelns informationstechnischer Systeme, Multimedia und Recht, Issue 9/2017, p. 589-594. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  103. Konar (1999) = Amit Konar: Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing – Behavioral and Cognitive Modeling of the Human Brain, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1999. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  104. Kop (2020a) = Mauritz Kop: AI & Intellectual Property: Towards an Articulated Public Domain, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2020, p. 297-342. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  105. Kop (2020b) = Mauritz Kop: Machine Learning & EU Data Sharing Practices, TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments – Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Issue 1/2020, p. 7-22. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  106. Kur (2020) = Annette Kur: Unité de l'art is Here to Stay – Cofemel and its Consequences, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 4/2020, p. 290-300. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  107. Lambert (2017) = Paul Lambert: Computer-generated Works and Copyright: Selfies, Traps, Robots, AI and Machine Learning, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2017, p. 12-20. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  108. Lang (2020) = Fabienne Lang: MIT Researchers Turn COVID-19 into a Classical Melody Using AI, Interesting Engineering, April 7, 2020. Retrieved from: https://interestingengineering.com/mit-res earchers-turn-covid-19-into-a-classical-melody-using-ai Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  109. Larsson (2017) = Stefan Larsson: Conceptions in the Code – How Metaphors Explain Legal Challenges in Digital Times, Oxford University Press, New York, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  110. Larsson (2020) = Stefan Larsson: On the Governance of Artificial Intelligence through Ethics Guidelines, Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2020, p. 1-15. (in press) Retrieved from: https://doi.org/1 0.1017/als.2020.19 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  111. Larsson / Heintz (2019) = Stefan Larsson / Fredrik Heintz: Transparency in Artificial Intelligence, Internet Policy Review, Issue 2/2019, p. 1-16. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  112. Latournerie (2001) = Anne Latournerie: Petite histoire des batailles du droit d’auteur, Multitudes, Issue 2/2001, p. 43-46. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  113. Lauber-Rönsberg / Hetmank (2019) = Anne Lauber-Rönsberg / Sven Hetmank: The Concept of Authorship and Inventorship Under Pressure: Does Artificial Intelligence Shift Paradigms?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 7/2019, p. 570-579. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  114. Leistner (2015) = Matthias Leistner: Copyright at the Interface Between EU Law and National Law: Definition of “Work” and “Right of Communication to the Public”, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Issue 8/2015, p. 626-637. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  115. Lemley / Casey (2020) = Mark A. Lemley / Bryan Casey: Fair Learning, 2020, p. 1-64. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3528447 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  116. Leonard (2013) = Michael Leonard: Meet Compressorhead – The World’s Most Metal Band, Gibson.com, April 9, 2013. Retrieved from: http://www2.gibson.com/News-Lifestyle/Features/en-us/ Meet-Compressorhead-The-Worlds-Most-Metal-Band.aspx Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  117. Lim (2018) = Milton Lim: History of AI Winters, Actuaries Digital, September 5, 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.actuaries.digital/2018/09/05/history-of-ai-winters/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  118. Linke / Petrlík (2020) = David Linke / David Petrlík: “Copyright Work and Its Definition With Regard to Originality and AI” – Conference Report on the 4th Binational Seminar of the TU Dresden and the Charles University in Prague, June 27, 2019, GRUR International, Issue 1/2020, p. 39-45. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  119. Litman (2006) = Jessica Litman: Digital Copyright, Prometheus Books, Amherst, 2006. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  120. Liu (2018) = Deming Liu: Forget the Monkey Copyright Nonsense for Goodness Sake, Dude!, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 1/2018, p. 61-65. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  121. Lohsse / Schulze / Staudenmayer (2019) = Sebastian Lohsse / Reiner Schulze / Dirk Staudenmayer (Eds.): Liability for Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things, Nomos-Hart, Baden-Baden, 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  122. Maggiore (2018) = Massimo Maggiore: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Generated Works and Copyright. In: Enrico Bonadio / Nicola Lucchi: Non-Conventional Copyright – Do New and Atypical Works Deserve Protection?, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2018, p. 382-399. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  123. Magrani (2019) = Eduardo Magrani: New Perspectives on Ethics and the Laws of Artificial Intelligence, Internet Policy Review, Issue 3/2019, p. 1-19. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  124. Margoni (2018) = Thomas Margoni: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and EU Copyright Law: Who Owns AI?, CREATe Working Paper 2018/12, December 2018, p. 1-21. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  125. Matthews (1890) = Brander Matthews: The Evolution of Copyright, Political Science Quarterly, 1890, p. 583-602. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  126. McCutcheon (2013a) = Jani McCutcheon: The Vanishing Author in Computer-Generated Works: A Critical Analysis of Recent Australian Case Law, Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 36, 2013, p. 915-969. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  127. McCutcheon (2013b) = Jani McCutcheon: Curing the Authorless Void: Protecting Computer-Generated Works Following ICETV and Phone Directories, Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 37, 2013, p. 46-102. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  128. McLeod Blythe (2020) = Stephen McLeod Blythe: Copyright Filters and AI Fails: Lessons from Banning Porn, European Intellectual Property Review, Issue 2/2020, p. 119-125. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  129. Metz (2019) = Cade Metz: Google Claims a Quantum Breakthrough That Could Change Computing, The New York Times, October 23, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/23/tec hnology/quantum-computing-google.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  130. Meys (2020) = Romain Meys: Data Mining Under the Directive on Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Single Market: Are European Database Protection Rules Still Threatening the Development of Artificial Intelligence?, GRUR International, Issue 5/2020, p. 457-473. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  131. Mezei (2014) = Péter Mezei: The Role of Technology and Consumers’ Needs in the Evolution of Copyright Law – From Gutenberg to the Filesharers. In: Éva Jakab (Ed.): Geistiges Eigentum und Urheberrecht aus der historischen Perspektive, Lectiones Iuridicae 10, Pólay Elemér Alapítvány, Szeged, 2014, p. 71-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  132. Mezei (2020) = Péter Mezei: Intervention to WIPO’s AI and IP Conversation, Copy21 Blog, June 23, 2020. Retrieved from: http://copy21.com/2020/06/intervention-to-wipos-ai-and-ip-conversation/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  133. Munro (2016) = Cait Munro: Meet Berenson, the Robot Art Critic, Artnet News, February 29, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  134. Retrieved from: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/robot-art-critic-berenson-436739 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  135. Nägele / Apel (2020) = Thomas Nägele / Simon Apel: KI und Urheberrecht. In: Markus Kaulartz / Tom Braegelmann: Rechtshandbuch Artificial Intelligence und Machine Learning, C.H. Beck-Vahlen, 2020, p. 289-309. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  136. Nahmias / Perel (2020) = Yifat Nahmias / Maayan Perel: The Oversight of Content Moderation by AI: Impact Assessments and Their Limitations, Harvard Journal of Legislation, 2020, p. 1-54. (forthcoming) Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3565025 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  137. Naudé (2019) = Wim Naudé: AI’s Current Hype and Hysteria Could Set the Technology Back by Decades, The Conversation, July 24, 2019. Retrieved from: http://theconversation.com/ais-current- hype-and-hysteria-could-set-the-technology-back-by-decades-120514 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  138. Netanel (1996) = Neil Weinstock Netanel: Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society, Yale Law Journal, 1996, p. 283-387. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  139. Nevejans (2016) = Nathalie Nevejans: European Civil Law Rules in Robotics, European Union, 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/571379/IPOL_STU( 2016)571379_EN.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  140. Ng Boyte (2014) = Alina Ng Boyte: The Conceits of our Legal Imagination: Legal Fiction and the Concept of Deemed Authorship, Legislation and Public Policy, 2014, p. 707-762. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  141. Nilsson (2010) = Nils J. Nilsson: The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  142. Nordemann / Vinck / Hertin / Meyer (1990) = Wilhelm Nordemann / Kai Vinck / Paul W. Hertin / Gerald Meyer: International Copyright and Neighboring Rights Law: Commentary with Special Emphasis on the European Community, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1990. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  143. Noto La Diega (2018) = Guido Noto La Diega: Artificial Intelligence and Databases in the Age of Big Machine, AIDA, 2018, p. 93-149. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  144. O’Neill (2020) = Rory O’Neill: AI-written articles are copyright-protected, rules Chinese court, World IP Review, January 10, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.worldipreview.com/news/ai-written-art icles-are-copyright-protected-rules-chinese-court-19102 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  145. Opitz (2020) = Paul Opitz: European Commission Working on Ethical Standards for Artificial Intelligence (AI), TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments – Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, Issue 2/2018, p. 28-30. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  146. Oremus (2014) = Will Oremus: The First News Report on the L.A. Earthquake Was Written by a Robot, Slate, March 17, 2014. Retrieved from: https://slate.com/technology/2014/03/quakebot-los- angeles-times-robot-journalist-writes-article-on-la-earthquake.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  147. Osha (2019) = Jonathan P. Osha: Summary Report – Copyright in artificially generated works, AIPPI, July 1, 2019. Retrieved from: https://aippi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/SummaryReport_COP YRIGHT-DATA_London2019_final_160719.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  148. Oster (2018) = Jan Oster: Haftung für Persönlichkeitsrechtsverletzungen durch Künstliche Intelligenz, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  149. UFITA – Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft, Issue 1/2018, p. 14-52. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  150. Pagallo / Corrales / Fenwick / Forgó (2018) = Ugo Pagallo / Marcelo Corrales / Mark Fenwick / Nikolaus Forgó: The Rise of Robotics & AI: Technological Advances & Normative Dilemmas. In: Corrales / Fenwick / Forgó (2018), p. 1-13. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  151. Palace (2019) = Victor M. Palace: What if Artificial Intelligence Wrote This? Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law, Florida Law Review, 2019, p. 217-242. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  152. Palazzetti (2020) = Laura Palazzetti: Artificial Intelligence and the Challenges of the Fashion Industries, Ius in itinere, June 25, 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.iusinitinere.it/artificial-intelligence Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  153. -and-the-challenges-of-the-fashion-industries-29023 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  154. Patterson / Birch / Joyce (2009) = L. Ray Patterson / Stanley F. Birch / Craig Joyce: A Unified Theory of Copyright – Chapter 2: The Copyright Clause and Copyright History, Houston Law Review, 2009, p. 244-256. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  155. Pila / Torremans (2016) = Justine Pila / Paul L. C. Torremans: European Intellectual Property Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  156. Price / Pollack (1992) = Monroe Price / Malla Pollack: The Author in Copyright: Notes for the Literary Critic, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 1992, p. 703-720. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  157. Prosser (2020) = Marc Prosser: How AI Helped Predict the Coronavirus Outbreak Before It Happened, SingularityHub, February 5, 2020. Retrieved from: https://singularityhub.com/2020/02/05/how-ai- helped-predict-the-coronavirus-outbreak-before-it-happened/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  158. Rahmatian (2019) = Andreas Rahmatian: Originality in UK Copyright Law: The Old “Skill and Labour” Doctrine Under Pressure, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Issue 8/2019, p. 4-34. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  159. Ralston (2005) = William T. Ralston: Copyright in Computer-Composed Music: HAL meets Handel, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  160. Journal of the Copyright Society U.S.A., 2005, p. 281-307. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  161. Ramalho (2017) = Ana Ramalho: Will Robots Rule the (Artistic) World?: A Proposed Model for the Legal Status of Creations by Artificial Intelligence Systems, Journal of Internet Law, Issue 1/2017, p. 1 and 12-25. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  162. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1998) = Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: A Silicon Hemingway – Artificial Author Brutus.1 Generates Betrayal By Bits, ScienceDaily, March 12, 1998. Retrieved from: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/03/980312075430.htm Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  163. Revolidis / Dahi (2018) = Ioannis Revolidis / Alan Dahi: The Peculiar Case of the Mushroom Picking Robot: Extra-contractual Liability in Robotics. In: Corrales / Fenwick / Forgó (2018), p. 57-79. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  164. Ricketson / Ginsburg (2005) = Sam Ricketson / Jane C. Ginsburg: International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond – Volume One, Second Edition, Oxford University Press, 2005. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  165. Ricketson (1991) = Sam Ricketson: The 1992 Horace S. Manges Lecture – People or Machines: The Berne Convention and the Changing Concept of Authorship, Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts, Issue 1/1991, p. 1-37. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  166. Rideau (2016) = Frédéric Rideau: Aspects of French Literary Property Developments in the Eighteenth (and Nineteenth) Centuries. In: Alexander / Gómez-Arestegui (2016), p. 391-422. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  167. Rohner (2019) = Tim Rohner: Der Schutz von KI-Schöpfungen im schweizerischen Urheberrecht, Zeitschrift für geistiges Eigentum / Intellectual Property Journal, Issue 1/2019, p. 33-85. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  168. Rosati (2013) = Eleonora Rosati: Originality in EU Copyright – Full Harmonization through Case Law, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  169. Rosati (2019) = Eleonora Rosati: Copyright as an Obstacle or an Enabler? A European Perspective on Text and Data Mining and its Role in the Development of AI Creativity, Asia Pacific Law Review, Issue 2/2019, p. 198-217. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  170. Rose (2010) = Mark Rose: The Public Sphere and the Emergence of Copyright: Areopagitica, the Stationers Company, and the Statute of Anne. In: Ronan Deazley / Martin Kretschmer / Lionel Bently: Privilege and Property – Essays on the History of Copyright, Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, 2010, p. 67-88. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  171. Samuelson (1986) = Pamela Samuelson: Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  172. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 1985-1986, p. 1185-1228. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  173. Schiller (2016) = Ben Schiller: This Japanese Novel Authored By A Computer Is Scarily Well-Written, Fast Company, March 28, 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.fastcompany.com/3058300/this-japa nese-novel-authored-by-a-computer-is-scarily-well-written Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  174. Schönberger (2018) = Daniel Schönberger: Deep Copyright: Up- and Downstream Questions Related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML). In: Jacques De Werra (Ed.): Droit d’auteur 4.0 / Copyright 4.0, Schulte Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-390
  175. Bamman/O’Connor/Smith, Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media, First Monday 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  176. Eifert/von Landenberg-Roberg/Theß/Wienfort, Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz in der Bewährung, 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  177. Gersdorf, Hate Speech in sozialen Netzwerken, MMR 2017, 439 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  178. Gorwa/Binns/Katzenbach, Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance, Big Data & Society 2020, 1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  179. Guggenberger, Das Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz – schön gedacht, schlecht gemacht, ZRP 2017, 98 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  180. Heldt, Terror-Propaganda online: Die Schranken der Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland und den USA, NJOZ 2017, 1458 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  181. Heldt, Reading between the lines and the numbers: an analysis of the first NetzDG reports, Internet Policy Review 2019, 1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  182. Heldt, Pflicht zu weltweiter Löschung: konsequente oder ausufernde Auslegung? – Anmerkung zum Urteil des EuGH v. 3.10.2019, Rs. EUGH Aktenzeichen C1818 C-18/18 (Glawischnig-Piesczek), EuR 2020, 238 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  183. Holznagel, Overblocking durch User Generated Content (UGC) – Plattformen: Ansprüche der Nutzer auf Wiederherstellung oder Schadensersatz?, CR 2018, 369 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  184. Klonick, The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech, Harv. L. Rev 2018, 1598 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  185. Klonick, The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent Institution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression, Yale L. J. 2020, 2232 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  186. Löber/Roßnagel, Das Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz in der Umsetzung, MMR 2019, 71 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  187. Loo, Federal Rules of Platform Procedure, U. Chi. L. Rev. 2020, 1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  188. Lüdemann, in: Eifert/Gostomzyk, Netzwerkrecht, 2018, 153 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  189. Rauchegger/Kuczerawy, Court of Justice Injunctions to remove illegal online content under the eCommerce Directive: Glawischnig-Piesczek, CML Review 2020, 1495 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  190. Riesewieck, Digitale Drecksarbeit, Originalausgabe 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  191. Roberts, Behind the Screen, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  192. Schiff, Meinungsfreiheit in mediatisierten digitalen Räumen, MMR 2018, 366 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  193. Wagner, Haftung von Plattformen für Rechtsverletzungen (Teil 2), GRUR 2020, 447 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529
  194. Wimmers/Heymann, Zum Referentenentwurf eines Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetzes (NetzDG) – eine kritische Stellungnahme, AfP 2017, 93 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/2568-9185-2020-2-529

Neuesten Ausgaben

UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Alle Ausgaben anzeigen
Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 89 (2025), Heft 1
Ausgabe Teilzugriff
Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Jahrgang 89 (2025), Heft 1
Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 88 (2024), Heft 2
Ausgabe Teilzugriff
Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Jahrgang 88 (2024), Heft 2
Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 88 (2024), Heft 1
Ausgabe Teilzugriff
Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Jahrgang 88 (2024), Heft 1
Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 87 (2023), Heft 2
Ausgabe Teilzugriff
Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Jahrgang 87 (2023), Heft 2
Cover der Ausgabe: UFITA Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft Jahrgang 87 (2023), Heft 1
Ausgabe Teilzugriff
Archiv für Medienrecht und Medienwissenschaft
Jahrgang 87 (2023), Heft 1