Cover des Buchs: European Security Put to the Test
Im Shop erwerben
, um zu prüfen, ob Sie einen Vollzugriff auf diese Publikation haben.
Sammelband Kein Zugriff

European Security Put to the Test

Perspectives and Challenges for the Next Decade
Herausgeber:innen:
Verlag:
 2021

Zusammenfassung

Die Pandemie und die jüngsten Cyber-Attacken haben die Verwundbarkeit und mangelnde Widerstandsfähigkeit der EU schonungslos offengelegt. Auf die heikle Position der Union in einer multipolaren Welt, in der sie für Multilateralismus eintritt und gleichzeitig Gefahr läuft, zwischen den USA, Russland und China zerrieben zu werden, muss mit einer umfassenden Strategie reagiert werden. Dieses Buch ist ein Beitrag zur Diskussion über die zukünftigen Prioritäten der EU in Außen-, Sicherheits- und Verteidigungsfragen.Mit Beiträgen vonKlaus Anderle, Prof. Dr. Klemens Fischer, Christina Kokkinakis, Elisabeth Kornfeind, Franz Leitgeb, Isabella Lindner, Jochen Rehrl, Stefani Weiss und Ursula Werther-Pietsch.

Schlagworte

Publikation durchsuchen

Bibliographische Angaben

Auflage
1/2021
Copyrightjahr
2021
ISBN-Print
978-3-8487-8558-2
ISBN-Online
978-3-7489-2979-6
Verlag
Nomos, Baden-Baden
Reihe
AIES-Beiträge zur Europa- und Sicherheitspolitik
Band
6
Sprache
Englisch
Seiten
222
Produkttyp
Sammelband

Inhaltsverzeichnis

KapitelSeiten
  1. Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Kein Zugriff 1 - 16
  2. Autor:innen:
    1. Quo Vadis, geopolitical commission? Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    2. European Integration – the Covid-19 legacy and ambitious future plans Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    3. Regional Stability in Europe Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    4. The EU’s historic Recovery Plan Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    5. Common Security and Defence Policy 2021 Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    6. EU Space Policy Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    7. Austria’s contribution to European security and defence Kein Zugriff
      Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. The Risk and Threat Landscape Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. The Politico- and Military-Strategic Framework Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. Where does European defence stand and what does it need for 2030? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. Improved European Capability Planning needed Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. Technology related challenges for European defence 2030 Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      6. Cooperation for best defending Europe in 2030 Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. Autor:innen:
      1. Review of previous attempts to foster European Defence Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. Autor:innen:
        1. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence (IPSD) Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. Coordinated Annual Review on Defence (CARD) Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        4. Military Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC) Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        5. European Union Battlegroups (EUBGs) Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        6. European Peace Facility (EPF) Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        7. EU-NATO Cooperation Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        8. Brief stocktaking on defence matters since 2016 Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        9. Moving on: the New Strategic Agenda and the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      3. Autor:innen:
        1. Crisis Management Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. Resilience Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. Capabilities Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        4. Cooperation with partners Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      4. Thoughts on the future Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. 1. Introduction Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. 2. Some thoughts about self-defence Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. 3. The development of the EU self-defense clause Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. Autor:innen:
        1. a. Trigger Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. Excursus: different language versions Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. b. Area of responsibility Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        4. c. All means in power Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        5. d. Legal obligation or political declaration Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        6. e. Art. 42 (7) TEU vs Article 5 NATO Treaty Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      5. Autor:innen:
        1. a. Terrorism, a case for Article 51 of the UN Charter Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. b. Legitimation of the measures Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. c. Implementation Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      6. 6. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      7. Annex 1: Mutual Assistance Clauses in various treaties Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      8. Annex 2: Armed aggression vs armed attack in 23 official EU languages Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. NATO 2030 Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. The future direction Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. NATOs approach to partners Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. Austria and NATO Partnership for Peace Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. Autor:innen:
      1. What is multilateralism? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. …and what does it mean for Austria? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. The Alliance for Multilateralism Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. The crisis of the global multilateral system Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. The EU and the UN: natural partners Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      6. Human rights and how to counter attacks against universality Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      7. You need two for a tango Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    3. Autor:innen:
      1. Autor:innen:
        1. I.1 Beyond Westlessness Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. I.2 On the resilience of international rules Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. I.3 A visionary counter-proposal Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      2. Autor:innen:
        1. II.1 What is new compared to 1945 Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        2. II.2 The EU’s stance: Politics of equidistance Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
        3. II.3 Establishing a twin-track model Kein Zugriff
          Autor:innen:
      3. III. Conclusion Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    1. Autor:innen:
      1. “Great Powers have Great Currencies.” Robert Mundell Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. Developments in the use of the euro, the US dollar and the renminbi Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. Digital Payment Systems – the underestimated private currency competition? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. The EU´s Open Strategic Autonomy and the International Role of the Euro Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. Decoupling and “Hegemonic” Currency US dollar Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      6. China´s dual circulation and the internationalization of the renminbi Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      7. Conclusions Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    2. Autor:innen:
      1. Multilateralism – Just a dream of the EU? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      2. Democracy withdrawing Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      3. The EU, weakened by crises at home, loses soft power Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      4. “No doings with dealings” Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      5. The EU an economic giant – but for how much longer? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      6. Dilemma no. 1: The EU is not a state and the member states can do as they please in foreign policy Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      7. Dilemma no. 2: The EU is a peace project – can a peace project condone the use of force as a means of politics? Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
      8. No, the EU cannot deliver in foreign and security policy Kein Zugriff
        Autor:innen:
    3. Lost in Implementation – The Political Dilemma of Enforcing the Rule of Law and its Impact on Foreign and Security Policy Kein Zugriff 195 - 220
      Autor:innen:
  6. About the Authors Kein Zugriff 221 - 222

Literaturverzeichnis (285)

  1. Sources and Literature Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  2. Biscop, The Future of the Transatlantic Alliance: Not Without the European Union, in: Egmont Institute, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Fall 2020; <https://www.egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2020/09/Biscop-nato-alliance.pdf?type=pdf> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  3. Council of the European Union, European Security Strategy, 08 December 2003; https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-15895-2003-INIT/en/pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  4. Dalsjö/Jonsson, Autonomy, Cacophony, or Coherence? The future of European Defense, in: War on the Rocks, 07 May 2021; https://warontherocks.com/2021/05/autonomy-cacophony-or-coherence-the-future-of-european-defense/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  5. European Council, Infographic - EU Global Strategy: implementation plan on security and defence; 25 November 2020, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/eu-global-strategy/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  6. European Defence Agency, 2020 CARD Report Executive Summary; https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/reports/card-2020-executive-summary-report.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  7. European Defence Agency, Defence Data 2018-2019 - Key findings and Analysis, 2021; https://eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/brochures/2019-eda-defence-data-report.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  8. European External Action Service, EU Global Strategy 2016, June 2016; https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  9. EUR-Lex, Treaty of the European Union; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12008M042 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  10. NATO ACT/ACO, Framework for Future Alliance Operations 2018, March 2018; https://www.act.nato.int/images/stories/media/doclibrary/180514_ffao18-txt.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  11. NATO, The Secretary General’s Annual Report 2020, 16 Mar 2021; https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2021/3/pdf/sgar20-en.pdf#page=12 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  12. NATO, NATO 2030: United for a New Era, Analysis and Recommendations of the Reflection Group Appointed by the NATO Secretary General, 25 November 2020; https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/12/pdf/201201-Reflection-Group-Final-Report-Uni.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  13. Nielson, Increasing Complexity and Uncertainty: Future Challenges to NATO and the West, 2018; http://www.ethikundmilitaer.de/en/full-issues/20181-strategic-foresight/nielson-increasing-complexity-and-uncertainty-future-challenges-to-nato-and-the-west/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  14. Rehrl (ed.), Handbook on CSDP - The Common Security and Defence Policy of The European Union, Volume I, 4th edition, May 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  15. Robertson et al, in: King’s College London, The future strategic direction of NATO, July 2020; https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/the-future-strategic-direction-of-nato.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  16. Ross, The Biggest Companies in the World in 2021, in: Visual Capitalist, 10 June 2021; https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-biggest-companies-in-the-world-in-2021/ Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  17. Watling/MacFarland, The Future of the NATO Corps, in: RUSI Occasional Paper, January 2021; https://rusi.org/sites/default/files/237_op_future_nato_corps_web_version.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  18. UK MoD, Defence in a competitive age, March 2021; https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/974661/CP411_-Defence_Command_Plan.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  19. US Army, TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1, 06 December 2018, https://adminpubs.tradoc.army.mil/pamphlets/TP525-3-1.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-33
  20. Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  21. Academic literature Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  22. Guy Verhofstadt, “The United States of Europe - Manifesto for a New Europe”, 2006 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  23. Howorth, Jolyon, “Security and Defence Policy in the European Union Research Service”, 2014, Palgrave Macmillan Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  24. Guy Verhofstadt, “Europe’s Last Chance - Why the European States Must Form a More Perfect Union”, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  25. Vivien A. Schmidt, “L’invention d’un nouvel avenir pour l’Europa” Cités 2017/3 (N0 71) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  26. Joris Larik, “The EU’s Global Strategy in the age of BREXIT and America First”, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Working Paper no. 193, December 2017, Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  27. Raphael Bossong, “Intelligence Support for EU Security Policy: Options for Enhancing the Flow of Information and Political Oversight”, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP Comment, no. 51, December 2018, Berlin Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  28. Tardy, Thierry & Lindstrom, Gustav, “The scope of EU - NATO cooperation”, The EU and NATO - The essential partners, Paris, March 2019, EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) - online version ISBN: 978-92-9198-836-5 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  29. Barbara Lippert & Nicolai von Ondarza & Perthes Volker, “European Strategic Autonomy - Actors, Issues, Conflicts and Interests”, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP, Research Paper, no. 4, March, 2019, Berlin Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  30. Pedro Serrano, “Truth and dare”, The CSDP in 2020 - The EU’s legacy and ambition in security and defence, Paris, March 2020, EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) - online version ISBN: 978-92-9198-860-0 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  31. Sven Biscop, “European Defence and PESCO: Don’t Waste the Chance”, EUIDEA Policy Papers, no. 1, May 5, 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  32. Florence Gaub & Lotje Boswinkel, “How Covid-19 changed the Future - Geopolitical Implications for Europe”, EUIIS Chaillot Papers, 162, December 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  33. Ian Bond, “Trump sounds the retreat: Can European defence advance?”, June 26, 2020, Centre for European Reform, https://www.cer.eu/insights/trump-sounds-retreat-can-eur-opean-defence-advance. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  34. Fareed Zakaria, “Ten Lessons for a Post-Pandemic World”, 2020, New York Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  35. Dr. Jana Puglierin, “Resilience“, DGAP Report: The EU’s Strategic Compass and Its four Baskets - Recommendations to make the most of it, no. 13, November 2020, Deut-sche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik (DGAP), p. 8. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  36. Marc Pierini, “How Far Can Turkey Challenge NATO and the EU in 2020?”, Carnegie Europe, January 29, 2020, Brussels Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  37. Raluca Csernatoni, “EU Security and Defence Challenges: Toward a European Defense Winter?”, Carnegie Europe, June 11, 2020, Brussels Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  38. pagebreak Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  39. Political and technical reference documentation Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  40. Treaty of Lisbon Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  41. European Council Conclusions on Common Security and Defence Policy, 25-26 November 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  42. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe: A Global Strategy for the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy, June 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  43. Council conclusions on implementing the EU global strategy in the area of Security and Defence, 14 November 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  44. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, 14 November 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  45. European Defence Action Plan, 30 November 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  46. The European Council and Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) - Orientation and implementation in the field of crisis management since the Lisbon Treaty, EPRS-Study, September 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  47. From a Shared Vision to Common Action: Implementing the EU Global Strategy Year 1, 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  48. Council of the EU, “Council Conclusions on Security and Defence in the context of the EU Global Strategy”, 13978/18, November 19, 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  49. Council of the EU, “Council Conclusions on Security and Defence in the context of the EU Global Strategy”, 10048/19, June 17, 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  50. A New Strategic Agenda 2019-2024, 20 June 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  51. Federal Ministry of Defence, “European Union Force Crisis Response Operation Core - Implementation Study”, Berlin, January 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  52. A New Strategic Agenda 2019-2024, 20 June 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  53. Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), “A world at risk - Annual Report on global preparedness for health emergencies”, Geneva: World Health Organization, September 2019, License: CCBY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  54. Sylvia-Carolina Sperandio, „Sicherheitsrisiko Pandemie“ in: Bundesministerium für Landesverteidigung “Sicherheitspolitische Jahresvorschau 2020 - Sicher. Und Morgen? “, 2019, Wien Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  55. Council of the EU, “Council Conclusions on Security and Defence”, 8910/20, June 17, 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  56. Council of the EU, “Council Conclusions on the PESCO strategic Review”, 12659/20, November 20, 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  57. 2020 CARD Report: Executive Summary, https.//eda.europa.eu/news/2020/11/20/min-isters-presented-with-new-opportunities-for-joint-military-capabili-ties-to-overcome frag-mented-European-defence-landscape Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  58. Fries, Charles, “Concrete solutions for concrete challenges”, European Defence Matters, no. 20, 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  59. Nikolas Nováky, „The Strategic Compass: Charting a New Course for the EU’s Security and Defence Policy”, Wilfried Martens Centre for European Studies, Policy Brief, December 19, 2020, Brussels Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  60. EUISS, “Finding direction with a Strategic Compass? Reflections on the future of EU security and defence”, EUISS Event Report, February 19, 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  61. Statement of the Members of the European, SN 2/21, February 26, 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  62. Council of the EU, “Council Conclusions on Security and Defence”, 8396/21, May 10, 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  63. https://pesco.europa.eu/binding-commitements Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  64. <https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/33557/EU> Battlegroups Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  65. <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/security/20190612STO54310/eu-ar-my-myth-what-is-europe-really-doing-to-boost-defence>. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-51
  66. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  67. 16th Petersberger Gespräche zur Sicherheit, Thomas de Maizière, Johannes Varwick et al, Weiterentwicklung der NATO, Webinar, 13 March 2021 < https://youtu.be/Z28V25HqYoM > accessed 24 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  68. Austrian Ministry of Defence, Sicher. Und morgen? Sicherheitspolitische Jahresvorschau 2020 (2019) < https://www.bundesheer.at/wissen-forschung/publikationen/publikation.php?id=991 > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  69. Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed), Europe’s Coherence Gap in External Crisis and Conflict Management. Political Rhetoric and Institutional Practices in the EU and Its Member States (Bertelsmann 2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  70. Biscop Sven, ‚PESCO, Strategic Autonomy, and Ambition’ Security and Peace (4/2018) 191-195, Video conference of foreign affairs ministers (defence), 6 April 2020 < consilium.europa.eu > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  71. Bothe Michael, ‘Peace-Keeping’ in Bruno Simma, Daniel-Erasmus Khan, Georg Nolte and Andreas Paulus (eds), The Charter of the United Nations (3rd edn, OUP 2012) 1182 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  72. Braml Josef and Schlie Ulrich, ‘The Biden Administration’s Geo-Economics. A Challenge for Europe’ (2021) TDHJ Special Edition #01 21, 6-9 < www.thedefencehorizon.org > accessed 14 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  73. Carnegie Europe (David Whineray), The pros and cons of a European Security Council (23 January 2020) < https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/80869 > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  74. Cassese Antonio, ‚Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving towards International Legitimation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?‘ (2003) EJIL < http://www.ejil.org/journal/Vol10/No1/com.html > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  75. Cassese Antonio, Self-determination of peoples: A legal reappraisal (CUP 1995) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  76. Cede Franz and Sucharipa-Behrmann Lilly (eds), The United Nations, Law and Practice (MANZ 1999) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  77. Collier Paul, Wars, Guns, and Votes: Democracy in Dangerous Places (Harper Collins 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  78. Commission on Human Security (Ogata Sadako et al), Human Security Now (2003) < https://humansecuritynow.org/ > accessed 21 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  79. De Brabandere Eric, ‘The Responsibility for Post-Conflict Reforms: A Critical Assessment of Jus Post Bellum as a Legal Concept’ 43 (2010) VJTL 119-149 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  80. Debiel Tobias and Franke Volker, ‚Auf tönernen Füßen?‘ in Cornelia Ulbert and Sascha Werthes (eds), Menschliche Sicherheit (Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden 2008) vol 21 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  81. Deng Francis M et al, Sovereignty as Responsibility, Conflict Management in Africa (Brookings 1996) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  82. European Commission, A Union that strives for more, Commission Work Programme 2020 (Brussels 29 January 2020) < https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2020-commission-work-programme-key-documents_en > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  83. European Defence Agency < https://eda.europa.eu/what-we-do/EU-defence-initiatives/european-defence-fund-(edf) > accessed 7 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  84. European Union, The Global Strategy (Brussels 2016) < https://eeas.europa.eu/topics/eu-global-strategy_en > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  85. Fawn Rick, ‘The Kosovo - and Montenegro - Effect’ International Affairs 84 (March 2008) 2, 269-294 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  86. Feichtinger Walter, ‚International Crisis Management revisited‘ in Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Global Peace and Security. International Crisis and Conflict Management (MANZ 2017) 83-94 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  87. Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford, The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation (2018) < https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/new-report-malicious-use-ai/ > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  88. Gady Franz-Stefan, Future Warfare, forthcoming Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  89. Galeotti Mark, We need to talk about Putin (Penguin 2019) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  90. Gareis Sven Bernhard and Varwick Johannes, The United Nations. Tasks, instruments and reforms (5th edn UTB 2014) 122 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  91. Gärtner Heinz, ‘The Post-COVID-19 World and Europe’s Role’ in Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 129-135 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  92. German Federal Foreign Office, Africa Policy Guidelines, 27 March 2019 < https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/2203542/6274c1b95ddfe1126f9d466a8d9e10c5/190327-afrika-ll-volltext-data.pdf > accessed 7 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  93. Gu Xuewu, Lecture on Geopolitics at Academic Forum for Foreign Policy, Vienna/Stallburg, 17 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  94. Halbach Uwe, ’"Georgia Crisis" and "Caucasus Conflict": The Regional Dimension (Springer 2009) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  95. Heinemann-Grüder Andreas, Glatz Rainer L. and Rotmann Philipp, commissioned by Beirat der Bundesregierung Zivile Krisenprävention und Friedensförderung, Schutzzonen: Möglichkeiten, Grenzen, Dilemmata, February 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  96. Herdegen Matthias, Der Kampf um die Weltordnung (C H Beck 2019) 52, 219 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  97. Herdegen Matthias, Völkerrecht (C H Beck 2016, 15th edn) 340 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  98. High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Vice President of the European Commission, and Head of the European Defence Agency, Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, Brussels, 14 November 2016, Doc. No. 14392/16 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  99. International Law Commission, Annual Report on the 71st session, UN Doc A/74/10 + Corr.1 (French only) as of 28 August 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  100. Ischinger Wolfgang, Welt in Gefahr (econ 2018) and lecture at the Austrian Society for the United Nations on 19 February 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  101. ISS (ed), Military Aktuell 1-2018 (National Defence Academy) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  102. Johns Hopkins University, coronavirus map < https://www.bing.com/search?q=johns+hopkins+coronavirus+map&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=johns+hopkins+coronavirus+map&sc=8-29&sk=&cvid=C10A0120FDBD4F7EAE45C41047F28380 > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  103. Kettemann Matthias, ‘Making the Internet work for Humanity’ in Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 251-254 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  104. Kissinger Henry A, Über die Vernunft der Nationen (dtb 1996) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  105. Kissinger Henry A, World Order (Penguin 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  106. Koskenniemi Martti, From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument Reissue with a New Epilogue (CUP 2005) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  107. Krause Joachim, ‘The International Order in Crisis’ International Politics (2007) no 7/8, 8-20 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  108. Mälksoo Lauri, Russian Approaches to International Law (OUP 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  109. May Larry, ‘Jus Post Bellum, Grotius, and Meionexia’ in Stahn J, Easterday J S and Iverson J (eds), Just Post Bellum, Towards a law of Transition From Conflict to Peace (Asser 2014) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  110. Munich Security Conference on 14-16 February 2020, < https://securityconference.org/en/ > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  111. Nannt Boris, ‚Decalogue on the World after COVID-19‘ (linkedIn 22 March 2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  112. NATO CCDCOE (ed), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (2nd edn CUP 2017) < https://ccdcoe.org/research/tallinn-manual/ > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  113. Nolte Georg and Krieger Heike, The International Rule of Law - Rise or Decline? (2016) KFG Working Paper no 1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  114. OECD DAC Recommendation on the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus, Paris 2019 < https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-5019 > accessed 6 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  115. OECD DAC, Statebuilding Guidance (OECD 2010) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  116. Paris Roland, ‚The Right to Dominate: How Old Ideas About Sovereignty Pose New Challenges for World Order‘ (2020) International Organisation 6-7 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  117. Peters Anne, ‘Humanity as the A and O of Sovereignty’ 20(3) (2009) 413-544 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  118. Pradetto August, ‘COVID-19 and International Power Structures’ in Ursula Werther-Pietsch (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 24-38 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  119. Reisner Markus, ‘The Indisputable Power of Drones - What current conflicts will tell us about the future’ (2021) TDHJ < www.thedefencehorizon.org > accessed 14 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  120. Ress Georg, ‚Auslegung der Charta‘ in Simma Bruno, Khan Daniel-Erasmus, Nolte Georg and Paulus Andreas (eds), The Charter of the United Nations (OUP 1991) XLV-LXV, XL VIII Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  121. Roth Andrew, ‘Putin appeals to Russians to vote to allow him to stay in office until 2036’ The Guardian International Edition online (Moscow, 30 June 2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  122. Rudolf Bernhardt (ed), Völkerrecht als Rechtsordnung - Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit - Menschenrechte, Festschrift Hermann Mosler (Berlin 1983) contribution 81 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  123. Russian Federation, The Russian Federations's National Security Strategy (2015), http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  124. Dubler SC R and Kalyk M, Crimes against Humanity in the 21st Century - Law, Practice and Threats to International Peace and Security (Brill 2018) 574-597 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  125. Schreiber Dan, ‘A Behavioural-Science Approach: Fit for Fragility - Decision Making in Highly Complex Situations’ (2021) TDHJ Special Edition #02 21, April 2021< www.thedefencehorizon.org > Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  126. Schröfl Josef, ‘Cyber Power as Main Trigger of Hybrid Threats’ in Ursula Werther-Pietsch (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 238-250 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  127. Sergunin Alexander, The United Nations (Routledge 2019) 362 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  128. Seyringer Bernhard, ‘No more ‚hide and bide’: Chinas Grand Strategy’ für die kommende Dekade 2020+’ 02 02(2021) ÖMZ 156-173 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  129. Simma Bruno, ‚Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner‘ (2009) 20(2) EJIL 265-297 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  130. Starlinger Thomas, ‘Creating a Planning and Operating Mechanism - a Stance by a Military’ in Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Global Peace and Security. International Crisis and Conflict Management (MANZ 2017) 176-209 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  131. Steiner Anna, ‘Nagorno-Karabakh and Eastern Partnership - Is There a Role for the EU?’ (2021) TDHJ Special Edition #01 21, 22-25 < www.thedefencehorizon.org > accessed 14 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  132. Stiglitz Joseph E, Globalization and its Discontents Revisited (W & W Norton 2018) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  133. Taylor Owen, ‘Human Security - Conflict, Critique and Consensus: Colloquium Remarks and a Proposal for a Threshold-Based Definition’ 35(3) (2004) Security Dialogue 373-387 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  134. Tchakarova Velina, ‘UNSC Balancing Between USA and Dragonbear’ in Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 136-152 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  135. Thürer Daniel, Völkerrecht als Fortschritt und Chance - Grundidee Gerechtigkeit (Dike 2016) vol 2 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  136. Tocci Natalie, ‚How coronavirus will upturn the global order‘ linkedIn 10 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  137. UN Peacekeeping Ministerial (New York 29 March 2019) < https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/2019-peacekeeping-ministerial-conference-event > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  138. UN Report of the High-Level Panel on Peace Operations (New York 17 June 2015) < http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/95 > accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  139. United Nations‚ In Larger Freedom, UN Doc A/59/2005 as of 21 March 2005 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  140. University of Bremen, Russia analyses no 362 of 16 November 2018 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  141. US Congressional Research Service, Artificial Intelligence and National Security, CRS Report, as of 30 January 2019 < https://crsreports.congress.gov > accessed 9 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  142. Van Oosterom Karel, With an Orange Tie: A year on the Security Council (indep. 2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  143. Van Veen Erwin, ‘Covid-19 and conflict in the Middle East’, CRU Policy Brief, April 2020 < https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/Policy_brief_Covid19_conflict_Middle_East_April_2020_0.pdf > accessed 6 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  144. V-DEM Institute, Autocratisation Surges - Resistance Grows. Democracy Report 2020 < https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/de/39/de39af54-0bc5-4421-89ae-fb20dcc53dba/democracy_report.pdf > accessed 6 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  145. Wank Lukas, ‘Powerhouses Ahead - Bit Tech Governance, the Future of the State and the Global Order’ in Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 255-269 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  146. Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Global Peace and Security (MANZ 2017) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  147. Werther-Pietsch Ursula (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  148. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, ‘At Crossroads and beyond‘ in Ursula Werther-Pietsch (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 64-72 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  149. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, ‘Humanity and Regionalisation - An Intertwined Vision’ in Ursula Werther-Pietsch (ed), Powering Universalism. Future Global Governance (Klein publishing 2021) 153-168 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  150. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, ‘Innovative military high technology - do we need a new warfare ethic?’ 04(2019) ÖMZ 445-447 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  151. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, ‚Brauchen wir einen EU-Sicherheitsrat?‘ Der Standard (Vienna 18 February 2020) 27 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  152. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, ‚Comprehensive Approach 3.0: „Triple Nexus“‘ 02(2019) ÖMZ 155-166 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  153. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, Kollektive Sicherheit 2030. Globale Friedenssicherung im Wandel, Series of the National Defence Academy 3/2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  154. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, Selbstbestimmung, Gewaltverbot und Friedenssicherung heute (nwv 2013) Habilitationsschrift Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  155. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, The Global Peace Mechanism and Its Inherent Failures (Springer) forthcoming Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  156. Werther-Pietsch Ursula, Women as Drivers for Peace. UN Security Council Resolution 1325 + 20 (Blue Helmet Forum 2020) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  157. World Bank and UNDP, Pathways for Peace. Inclusive Approaches to Preventing Conflict (World Bank 2018) < https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/28337> accessed 13 April 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-127
  158. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  159. Aggarwal V. (2020). Digital Currency Wars? US-China Competition and Economic Statecraft. Global Asia Vol. 15, No. 4, December 4. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  160. BIS (2020). Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC): foundational principles and core features. Executive Paper. January, Basle. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp33_summary.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  161. Bloomberg (2021). Yuan’s Popularity for Global Payments Hits Five-Year High Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  162. Campagne B. et al. (2018). The global network of central bank swap lines. Trésor-economics, No. 231, November, Paris.https://www.tresor.economie.gouv.fr/Articles/febfa619-a7e6-464b-a184-9fb906c65982/files/b9fbf57d-c648-4fc6-8ff5-df287b9bbe29 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  163. Chinese Communist Party (2020). China´s 14th Five Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2030. October, Beijing. Translation CSET. December 2020. https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/t0237_5th_Plenum_Proposal_EN-1.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  164. Dow Jones Newswires (2021). El Salvador becomes First Country to Approve Bitcoin as Legal Tender. June 9 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  165. ECB (2020). Report on a Digital Euro. October, Frankfurt. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/Report_on_a_digital_euro~4d7268b458.en.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  166. ECB (2021). International Role of the Euro, June, European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/ire/html/ecb.ire202106~a058f84c61.en.html#toc1 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  167. EC (2018). President Juncker. The Hour of European Sovereignty. State of the Union Address. 2018, December 5. soteu2018-speech_en_0.pdf (europa.eu). Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  168. European Council and the Euro Summit, December, Communication of the European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/communication_-_towards_a_stronger_international_role_of_the_euro.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  169. EC (2018b). Recommendation on the international role of the euro in the field of energy, 5.12.2021. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/recommendation_-_the_international_role_of_the_euro_in_the_field_of_energy.pdf. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  170. EC (2020). Communication from the European Commission on a Retail Payments Strategy for the EU. September 24, Brussels. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  171. EC (2021). The European economic and financial system: fostering openness, strength and resilience. Communication from the European Commission. January 9, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0032&from=EN Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  172. Eichengreen, B., Gros, D. (2020). Post-COVID-19 Global Currency Order: Risks and Opportunities for the Euro. Study requested by the European Parliament. September. Luxemburg. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0110_EN.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  173. FED (2021). Private Money and Central Bank Money as Payments go Digital: an update on CBDCs. Speech Lael Brainard, Consensus by CoinDesk 2021 Conference, May 24, Washington D.C., https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/files/brainard20210524a.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  174. Fraser C. (2021). Money talks: EU strategic autonomy requires a strong euro. European Policy Centre, March, Brussels. https://www.epc.eu/en/publications/Money-talks-EU-strategic-autonomy-requires-a-strong-euro~3b2a7c Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  175. Gopinath, Gita, Emine Boz, Camila Casas, Federico J. Díez, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas and Mikkel Plagborg-Møller (2020), Dominant Currency Paradigm, American Economic Review, Vol. 110, No 3, pp. 677-719 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  176. Handelsblatt (2021). Asia Technomics: Chinas E-Yuan ist innovativ und reaktionär zugleich. 9. Juni Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  177. Handelsblatt (2021a). Kryptowährung: Fed-Vize Quarles hält nichts von digitalem Dollar. 2. Juli Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  178. IMF (2020). Annual Report on Exchange arrangements and Exchange Restrictions 2019. Washington D.C. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  179. IMF (2020a). Peoples´ Republic of China. Staff Report for the 2020 Art- IV Consultation. Box 8. Unpublished, December 17. Washington D.C. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  180. Kärnfelt, M. (2020). China´s Currency Push. The Chinese Yuan expands its footprint in Europe. Mercator Institute for China Studies. January 9, Berlin. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  181. Mundell, R. (1993). EMU and the International Monetary System. A Transatlantic Perspective. Austrian National Bank Working Paper 13, Vienna. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  182. Reininger, Th., Schuberth, H., Wögerer, M. (2019). Ten years after: capital flows and the global monetary order. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Interventions, Vol. 16 No. 2. Pp 208-225. Edward Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  183. SWIFT (2021). RMB Tracker. Monthly reporting and statistics on renminbi progress towards becoming an international currency. June. https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/compliance-and-shared-services/business-intelligence/renminbi/rmb-tracker/rmb-tracker-document-centre Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-153
  184. Bibliography Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  185. Books Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  186. Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect. How the European Union Rules the World, Oxford UP, Oxford, 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  187. Cooper, Robert, The post-modern state and the world order, Demos, London, 1996. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  188. Haass, Richard N., Foreign Policy Begins at Home: The Case for Putting America’s House in Order, Basic Books, New York, 2013. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  189. Nye, Joseph, Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, PublicAffairs, New York, 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  190. Youngs, Richard, The European Union and Global Politics, Bloomsbury Publishing plc, London, 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  191. Articles in books Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  192. Gerber, Thomas, and Weder, Rolf, “David Ricardo’s ‘On Foreign Trade’: The Original Idea”, in: Jones, Ronald W., and Weder, Rolf, 200 Years of Ricardian Trade Theory: Challenges of Globalization, pp. 41-54, Springer, Hamburg, 2017. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  193. Online encyclopedias Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  194. “Common Commercial Policy (EU)”, Wikipedia, 19 April 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  195. Online magazine and newspaper articles Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  196. Fleming, Sam, and Khan, Mehreen, “Merkel and Macron fail in push for EU summit with Putin”, Financial Times, Brussels, 25 June 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  197. Joffe, Josef, “Wozu Krieg, wenn der Panzerlärm reicht?” Tagesspiegel Online, Berlin, 19 April 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  198. Hoffmann, Stanley, “Towards a Common European Foreign and Security Policy?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, June 2000, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 189-198. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  199. Kastner, Jill and Wohlforth, William C., “A Measure Short of War. The Return of Great-Power Subversion”, Foreign Affairs, New York, July/August 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  200. Lau, Stuart, “EU starts work on rival to China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, politico.eu, Brussels, 6 July 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  201. Rettman, Andrew, “Russia humiliates Borrell in Moscow”, euobserver.com, Brussels, 5 February 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  202. “Emmanuel Macron warns Europe: NATO is becoming brain-dead”, The Economist, London, 7 November 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  203. “EU agrees first sanctions on China in more than 30 years”, euronews.com, Brussels, 22 March 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  204. “Germany calls for abolition of EU foreign policy vetos“, dw.com, 7 June 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  205. “Global democracy has a very bad year”, The Economist, London, 2 February 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  206. “Margrethe Vestager scares the tech giants. If we leave the EU, we’ll miss her”, The Guardian, 21 July 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  207. “Suez Canal blocked after huge container ship wedged across it”, BBC News, London, 24 March 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  208. Websites of supranational authorities and organisations Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  209. Giovanetti, Giorgia, “The security-development nexus: how to bridge the gap between foreign/security policies and development policies, Introductory notes”, European Union Institute for Security Studies, paper presented to the EUISS conference “Peacebuilding and the Security-Development Nexus”, New York, 26 April 2010. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  210. “According to Advocate General Rantos, by imposing criminal penalties on organising activities intended to enable persons to initiate the international protection procedure who do not fulfil the national criteria for the grant of that protection, Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law,” Press Release No 27/21, Court of Justice of the European Union, Luxembourg, 25 February 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  211. “A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy”. General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, Brussels, 28 June 2016. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  212. “A secure Europe in a better world - European Security Strategy”. Council of the European Union, Brussels, 12 December 2003. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  213. “European Security Strategy. A secure Europe in a better world”. Council of the European Union, Brussels 2009. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  214. “European Union receives Nobel Peace Prize 2012”, Europa.eu, Brussels, 26 November 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  215. “European Union sanctions”, European External Action Service, Brussels, 17 March 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  216. “Global Trends to 2030: Can the EU meet the challenges ahead?”, European Strategy and Policy Analysis System, Luxemburg, 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  217. “Making the most of globalisation: EU trade policy explained”, European Parliament, Brussels, 3 June 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  218. “Petersberg Declaration” made by the WEU Council of Ministers, Bonn, 19 June 1992. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  219. “Political reflection on the future of the European Union”, Council of the European Union, Brussels, no date. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  220. “Rule of Law: European Commission launches infringement procedure to safeguard the independence of judges in Poland”, Press Release, European Commission, Brussels, 29 April 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  221. “Strengthening multilateralism: Council adopts conclusions”, Press Release, Council of the European Union, Brussels, 17 June 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  222. “The EU strategic autonomy debate”, Briefing What Think Tanks are Thinking, European Parliament, Brussels, 30 March 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  223. World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021, International Monetary Fund, Washington, 2021 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  224. Government websites Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  225. Échange téléphonique avec M. Vladimir POUTINE, Président de la Fédération de Russie, Élysée.fr, 2 July 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  226. Macron, Emmanuel, “For European Renewal“, Élysée.fr, 4 March 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  227. Speech by Federal Chancellor Dr Angela Merkel at the ceremony awarding the International Charlemagne Prize to French President Emmanuel Macron in Aachen on 10 May 2018, The Federal Government, 10 May 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  228. Speech by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier entitled “The World has come loose from its Moorings”, on the occasion of the Deutscher Evangelischer Kirchentag, Stuttgart, 7 June 2015, Auswärtiges Amt, Berlin, 7 June 2015. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  229. Online think tank publications Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  230. Bertelsmann Stiftung, ed., Antagonisms in the EU’s neighbourhood. The EU, Russia, Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia struggle for influence in their common neighbourhood. Guetersloh, August 2018. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  231. Bertelsmann Stiftung, ed., Eich, Frank, Hanelt, Christian-Peter, and Kosmehl, Miriam, Covid-19: A new era of closer cooperation between the EU and its neighbours?, Guetersloh, 4 November 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  232. Bertelsmann Stiftung, ed., Europe’s Coherence Gap in External Crisis and Conflict Management. Political Rhetoric and Institutional Practices in the EU and Its Member States, Guetersloh 2020. <https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/en/publications/publication/did/covid-19-a-new-era-of-closer-cooperation-between-the-eu-and-its-neighbours-en> Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  233. Dawson, Mark, “Juncker’s Political Commission: Did it Work?”, European Policy Analysis, Stockholm, May 2019:8epa. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  234. Dempsey, Judy, “Why the European Union Cannot Do Foreign Policy”, Carnegie Europe, Brussels, 9 February 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  235. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, ed., Kappel, Robert, Redefining Europe-Africa Relations, Berlin, 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  236. IFW Kiel Institute for the World Economy, “Africa benefits from trade with Asia and China”, Kiel, 2 September 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  237. MSC Special Edition 2021 - Munich Security Conference, Munich, 2021. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  238. Schuette, Leonard, “Should the EU make foreign policy decisions by majority voting?” Centre for European Reform, Brussels, May 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  239. Subotić, Strahinja, “A ‘Geopolitical’ Commission - What’s in the Name?”, European Policy Centre, Brussels, 19 September 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  240. Venturi, Bernardo, “Challenges for the development-security nexus in EU foreign policy”, European Think Tanks Group, 17 November 2020. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  241. von Daniels, Laura, Dröge, Susanne, and Bögner, Alexandra, “Ways Out of the WTO’s December Crisis. How to Prevent the Open Global Trade Order from Unravelling”, SWP Comment 2019/C 46, Berlin, 4 December 2019. Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-175
  242. References Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  243. Bingham, Tom: The Rule of Law, London 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  244. Brands, Hal: The Emerging Biden Doctrine - Democracy, Autocracy, and the defining Clash of Our Time, in: Foreign Affairs, June 29, 2021, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-06-29/emerging-biden-doctrine Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  245. Cicero, Marcus Tullius: De Legibus, Essen 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  246. Council of Europe: 'Rule of Law Checklist', https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2016)007-e Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  247. Craig, Paul/ De Búrca, Gráinne: EU Law - Text, Cases, and Materials, 7th Edition, Oxford 2020 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  248. Dalli, Helena: https://twitter.com/helenadalli/status/1289870901370970112 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  249. Deutsche Welle: https://www.dw.com/de/warnsignal-aus-br%C3%BCssel-polnische-st%C3%A4dte-ohne-eu-gelder/a-54382201 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  250. DeWitt, John: Essay II, in: Ketcham, Ralph (ed.): The Anti-Federalist Papers, New York 2003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  251. European Commission: Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: Further Strengthening the Rule of Law in the Union, Current Situation and Possible Next Steps, COM(2019)163, Brussels, 3 April 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  252. European Commission: Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Strengthening the Rule of Law in the Union, A Way Forward, COM(2019)343, Brussels, 17 July 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  253. European Commission: COM(2019)163 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  254. European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 489, https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s2235_91_3_489_eng?locale=en Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  255. European Court of Justice: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=215341&pageIndex=0&doc-lang=DE&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=15095383 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  256. European Court of Justice: http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=227569&pageIndex=0& doclang=DE&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=15137169 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  257. European Parliament: Resolution of 17 May 2017 on the situation in Hungary (2017/2656(RSP)) (P8_TA(2017)0216): https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0216_EN.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  258. Fischer, Klemens H.: Der Vertrag von Nizza, Text und Kommentar, Baden-Baden - Zürich 2001 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  259. Fischer, Klemens H.: Die Entwicklung des europäischen Vertragsrechts, 2nd edition, Baden-Baden-Wien-Bern 2016 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  260. Fischer, Klemens H.: In Defence of the European Myth - Value-based Decisions versus Post-Truth Politics, in: Ziegerhofer, Anita et al. (Hrsg): Zukunft Europa? Festschrift für Johannes W. Pichler, Wien 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  261. Fukuyama, Francis: The Origins of Political Order, New York 2011 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  262. Habermas, Jürgen: Faktizität und Geltung - Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats, 7th edition, Frankfurt 2019 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  263. Hamilton, Alexander: Federalist N° 84, in: Rossiter, Clinton. (ed.): The Federalist Papers, New York 2003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  264. Harrington, James, The Commonwealth of Oceana, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2801/2801-h/2801-h.htm Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  265. Hayek, August Friedrich von: Law, Legislation and Liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy, Volume I, Oxon 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  266. Heinegg, Heintschel von: Kommentar zu Artikel 2 EUV, N° 10, in: Vedder, Christoph/ Heinegg, Heintschel von (Hrsg.): Europäisches Unionsrecht - EUV, AEUV, Grundrechte-Charta, Baden-Baden 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  267. Heinegg, Heintschel von: Kommentar zu Artikel 7 EUV, RN 29, in: Vedder, Christoph/ Heinegg, Heintschel von (Hrsg.): Europäisches Unionsrecht - EUV, AEUV, Grundrechte-Charta, Baden-Baden 2012 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  268. Hobsbawm, Eric: Globalisation, Democracy and Terrorism, London 2008 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  269. Karlhofer, Ferdinand/ Sickinger, Hubert: Der Anlassfall, in: Karlhofer, Ferdinand/ Melchior, Josef/ Sickinger, Hubert (Hrsg.): Anlassfall Österreich - Die Europäische Union auf dem Weg zu einer Wertegemeinschaft, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Sonderband, Baden-Baden 2001 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  270. Kelsen, Hans: Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd Edition 1960, reprint 2000, Vienna Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  271. Kirchner, Thomas: Orbáns erfolgreiches Taktieren, Süddeutsche Zeitung, https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/verstoesse-gegen-eu-prinzipien-orbans-erfolgreiches-taktieren-1.4974141 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  272. Kirste, Stephan; Die Rule of Law in der deutschen Rechtsstaatstheorie des 19. Jahrhunderts, in: Hruschka, Joachim/ Byrd, Sharon B./ Joerden, Jan C. (Hrsg.) Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/ Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Vol. 21, 2013 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  273. Kley, Andreas: Verfassungsgeschichte der Neuzeit Online, http://www.rwi.uzh.ch/elt-lst-kley/verfg/schweiz/de/html/chapter_1_12.html Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  274. Luce, Edward: The Retreat of Western Liberalism, London 2017 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  275. Machiavelli, Niccolò: Discorso sopra il riforma lo stato di Firenze fatto ad istanza di Papa Leone X., in Oliva, Ernesto (Hrsg.): Opere Complete di Niccolò Macchiavelli, Milano 1850 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  276. Machiavelli, Niccolò: The Prince, London 2015 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  277. Madison, James: Federalist N° 10, in: Rossiter, Clinton. (ed.): The Federalist Papers, New York 2003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  278. Madison, James: Federalist N° 51, in: Rossiter, Clinton. (ed.): The Federalist Papers, New York 2003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  279. Madison, James: Federalist N° 62, in: Rossiter, Clinton. (ed.): The Federalist Papers, New York 2003 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  280. Mills, John Stuart: On Liberty, London 2010 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  281. Monnet, Jean: Erinnerungen eines Europäers, Baden-Baden 1988 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  282. Neisser, Heinrich: Anlassfall Österreich - die europäische Perspektive, in: Karlhofer (et al.) Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  283. Pöschl: https://staatsrecht.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/i_staatsrecht/Poeschl/Publikationen/Die_Verfassung_und_Ihre_Funktionen_-_onlinedatei.pdf Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  284. The Economist: Charlemagne: Euro crisis (with guns), in: The Economist, 1. August 2020, p 21 Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195
  285. Tiroler Tageszeitung: https://www.tt.com/artikel/30744134/lgbt-freie-zonen-in-polen-eu-kommission-verweigert-foerderung Google Scholar öffnen doi.org/10.5771/9783748929796-195

Ähnliche Veröffentlichungen

aus der Reihe "AIES-Beiträge zur Europa- und Sicherheitspolitik"
Cover des Buchs: European Security Put to the Test
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Klemens H. Fischer
European Security Put to the Test
Cover des Buchs: European Security
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Klemens H. Fischer
European Security
Cover des Buchs: Peacebuilding at Home
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Arnold H. Kammel, Benjamin Zyla
Peacebuilding at Home
Cover des Buchs: Good Governance Based on a Common Bedrock of Values - Providing Stability in Times of Crisis?
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Alexander Balthasar, Klemens H. Fischer
Good Governance Based on a Common Bedrock of Values - Providing Stability in Times of Crisis?
Cover des Buchs: Integrationsprojekt Sicherheit
Sammelband Kein Zugriff
Franco Algieri, Arnold H. Kammel, Jochen Rehrl
Integrationsprojekt Sicherheit

Hinweis

Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und darf nur nach den Vorgaben der Nutzungs- und Lizenzvereinbarung genutzt werden. Jede darüber hinaus gehende Nutzung des Werkes ist ausdrücklich untersagt und wird verfolgt.

Feedback geben

Wir freuen uns über Ihr Feedback zu Inhalten und Funktionen. Ihre Nachricht hilft uns, unseren Service stetig zu verbessern.

Bewertung
Bild anhängen
oder hier ablegen
PNG oder JPG (max. 3 MB)

Anmelden

Passwort vergessen?
Login über Ihre Institution (SSO, Shibboleth, OpenAthens)
Noch kein Benutzerkonto?
Jetzt registrieren

Publikation zitieren

Download: RIS BibTex